Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Endovascular Procedures”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Aortic aneurysm morphology for planning endovascular procedures.

Endovascular prosthesis repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms is based upon the development of low-profile devices that can be expediently deployed within the aneurysm, excluding it from intraluminal pressure. Many factors affect the treatment of patients in this manner, including the morphology of the proximal and distal fixation sites, the diameter and disease state of the access vessels, and the ability of the device to conform to the many anatomic variations of aneurysms. In addition, preliminary data suggest there is progressive shrinkage and morphologic change in the configuration of an aneurysm following exclusion, which not only affects the alignment of the device but may also influence its healing and stability. This paper reviews the morphologic parameters of aneurysms relevant to endovascular repair and describes the imaging technologies used to assess these parameters before, during, and after intervention.

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal↗

Training with simulation improves residents' endovascular procedure skills.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular procedure simulators are now commercially available and in use for physician training. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of simulation-based training in vascular surgery residencies. METHODS: Residents from vascular surgery programs in a five-state area were invited to participate in a series of 2-day endovascular training programs that used a high-fidelity endovascular procedure simulator (SimSuite; Medical Simulation Corporation, Denver, Colo), didactic instruction, computer-based training, and tabletop procedure demonstrations. The curriculum covered arteriography and intervention for treatment of aortoiliac, renal, and carotid artery disease. Nine residents participated, with one to three per training session. Each completed an average of 9.5 simulated endovascular cases. Performance on a standardized TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus B iliac angioplasty/stenting case was used to assess endovascular skills and knowledge at the beginning of the training program, and this was repeated at the completion of the training. Performance metrics were measured by the simulator, faculty observed trainees' performance of simulated cases, and trainees provided their evaluations of the usefulness of the simulation experiences. RESULTS: Endovascular procedural skills on the standardized iliac intervention case improved after completion of the training program. Compared with performance early on day 1, performance improved (P < or = .05; paired t test): total procedure time decreased 54%, volume of contrast decreased 44%, and fluoroscopy time decreased 48% (mean change from baseline). Selection of angioplasty balloon catheters and stents was improved, and the average number of catheters used and stents deployed decreased, although this did not reach statistical significance. Faculty observation allowed identification of shortcomings of knowledge and skills, including common problems with selection of catheter, balloon, and stent sizes; correct positioning of the sheath; and intraprocedural monitoring. Postcourse evaluations indicated support for the use of simulation in vascular surgery residents' endovascular training. CONCLUSIONS: Training with a simulator, incorporated into an individual or small group learning session, offers a means to learn and realistically practice endovascular procedures without direct risk to patients, with measurable improvements in key performance metrics. How simulation training affects subsequent clinical performance has yet to be established.

Endoscopy↗

Treatment of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: complementary aspects of microsurgical and endovascular procedures.

OBJECT: Endovascular and surgical treatment must be clearly defined in the management of anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms. In this study the authors report their recent experience in using a combined surgical and endovascular team approach for ACoA aneurysms, and compare these results with those obtained during an earlier period in which surgical treatment was used alone. Morbidity and mortality rates, causes of unfavorable outcomes, and morphological results were also assessed. METHODS: The prospective study included 223 patients who were divided into three groups: Group A (83 microsurgically treated patients, 1990-1995); Group B (103 microsurgically treated patients, 1996-2000); and Group C (37 patients treated with Guglielmi Detachable Coil [GDC] embolization, 1996-2000). Depending on the direction in which the aneurysm fundus projected, the authors attempted to apply microsurgical treatment to Type 1 aneurysms (located in front of the axis formed by the pericallosal arteries). They proposed the most adapted procedure for Type 2 aneurysms (located behind the axis of the pericallosal arteries) after discussion with the neurovascular team, depending on the physiological status of the patient, the treatment risk, and the size of the aneurysm neck. In accordance with the classification of Hunt and Hess, the authors designated those patients with unruptured aneurysms (Grade 0) and some patients with ruptured aneurysms (Grades I-III) as having good preoperative grades. Patients with Grade IV or V hemorrhages were designated as having poor preoperative grades. By performing routine angiography and computerized tomography scanning, the causes of unfavorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] score < 5) and the morphological results (complete or incomplete occlusion) were analyzed. Overall, the clinical outcome was excellent (GOS Score 5) in 65% of patients, good (GOS Score 4) in 9.4%, fair (GOS Score 3) in 11.6%, poor (GOS Score 2) in 3.6%, and fatal in 10.3% (GOS Score 1). Among 166 patients in good preoperative grades, an excellent outcome was observed in 134 patients (80.7%). The combined permanent morbidity and mortality rate accounted for up to 19.3% of patients. The rates of permanent morbidity and death that were related to the initial subarachnoid hemorrhage were 6.2 and 1.5% for Group A, 6.6 and 1.3% for Group B, and 4 and 4% for Group C, respectively. The rates of permanent morbidity and death that were related to the procedure were 15.4 and 1.5% for Group A, 3.9 and 0% for Group B, and 8 and 8% for Group C, respectively. When microsurgical periods were compared, the rate of permanent morbidity or death related to microsurgical complications decreased significantly (Group A, 11 patients [16.9%] and Group B, three patients [3.9%]); Fisher exact test, p = 0.011) from the period of 1990 to 1995 to the period of 1996 to 2000. The combined rate of morbidity and mortality that was related to the endovascular procedure (16%) explained the nonsignificance of the different rates of procedural complications for the two periods, despite the significant decrease in the number of microsurgical complications. Among 57 patients in poor preoperative grade, an excellent outcome was observed in 11 patients (19.3%); however, permanent morbidity (GOS Scores 2-4) or death (GOS Score 1) occurred in 46 patients (80.7%). With regard to the correlation between vessel occlusion (the primary microsurgical complication) and the morphological characteristics of aneurysms, only the direction in which the fundus projected appeared significant as a risk factor for the microsurgically treated groups (Fisher exact test: Group A, p = 0.03; Group B, p = 0.002). The difference between endovascular and microsurgical procedures in the achievement of complete occlusion was considered significant (chi2 = 6.13, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The direction in which the fundus projects was chosen as the morphological criterion between endovascular and surgical methods. The authors propose that microsurgical clip application should be the preferred option in the treatment of ACoA aneurysms with anteriorly directed fundi and that endovascular packing be selected for those lesions with posteriorly directed fundi, depending on morphological criteria.

Albumins↗

Surveillance for recurrent stenosis after endovascular procedures. A prospective study.

Eighty-nine endovascular procedures were performed during a 1-year period. Techniques included balloon angioplasty (n = 50), laser-assisted balloon angioplasty (n = 32), and atherectomy (n = 7). Indications were claudication (65.2%), critical ischemia (30.3%), and failing bypass (4.5%). Preoperative evaluation included a history and physical examination, segmental limb pressures, and color duplex ultrasonography. Postoperative surveillance consisted of a history and physical examination, ankle-arm indexes, and color duplex examinations at 1-week, 1-month, and then 3-month intervals. All levels of aortoiliac and infrainguinal disease were treated. Immediate technical success rate was 89.8%. Recurrence rates by life-table analysis reveal a 9-month patency rate of 45.4%. Early results of this prospective study indicate that endovascular procedures are subject to significant restenosis rates. Restraint is advised concerning general acceptance of endovascular procedures pending critical study.

Aged↗

White blood cell and endothelial cell response to endovascular procedures in the leg.

AIM: The longterm patency of endovascular procedures is partly depending on restenosis by intimal hyperplasia, a process depending on inflammatory mechanisms resembling the mechanisms of normal repair and the process of atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to characterize the inflammatory response of white blood cells (WBC) and endothelial cells following endovascular procedures in the leg. METHODS: Venous blood samples were drawn from a cubital vein before and 2 hours after intervention in 19 patients suffering from peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). Flow cytometry was used to identify and determine the concentrations of WBC and platelets and to measure CD11b/CD18 on WBC and CD41 on platelets. Soluble endothelial markers (sICAM-1, sE-selectin, sP-selectin and sVCAM-1) were measured by ELISA technique. RESULTS: WBC were downregulated following endovascular procedures. The endothelial cell response was limited and only downregulation of sP-selectin reached significant levels. The results were more evident in the group of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) compared to patients with intermittent claudication (IC). CONCLUSION: Endovascular procedures in the leg evoke only a limited response which is depending on the degree of ischemia and the magnitude of the interventional procedure.

Aged↗

A hybrid endovascular procedure to preserve internal iliac artery patency during endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of a hybrid endovascular procedure to preserve blood flow in the internal iliac arteries (IIA) during aortoiliac endografting. TECHNIQUE: When aneurysmal dilatation makes the distal neck in the common iliac artery (CIA) too short for an adequate seal, the CIA bifurcation is exposed via an extraperitoneal approach after endograft deployment. Via an arteriotomy in the CIA, the distal end of the stent-graft is sutured to the CIA bifurcation under direct vision to preserve IIA blood flow. This approach has been successful in preserving IIA blood flow in 5 of 7 endograft procedures; in the other 2, IIA occlusion was a predictable event. CONCLUSIONS: Direct suturing of an aortoiliac stent-graft to the CIA bifurcation via an extraperitoneal approach is a useful method of maintaining IIA perfusion. However, further study is required to identify patients at high risk of pelvic ischemia who would benefit from such intervention.

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal↗

Subclavian artery catheterization: a new approach for endovascular procedures.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous access to the arterial system for endovascular procedures is usually achieved through the femoral arteries. When femoral access is precluded, the axillary or brachial arteries serve as alternatives. Complications associated with the use of the latter arteries have led us to develop subclavian arterial catheterization. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 1978 to 1993, 569 patients underwent angiography via the subclavian artery (> 99% left subclavian artery); 134 were studies of the aortic arch and brachiocephalic vessels; 435 studies involved the descending and abdominal aorta and its branches and runoff. Coronary arteriography was also feasible. Since 1986, 44 patients have undergone endovascular procedures: 33 percutaneous transluminal angioplasties of the visceral, iliac, femoral, and popliteal arteries and 11 thrombolytic procedures of aortofemoral graft limbs (n = 3) and femoral distal bypasses (n = 8) were performed. Complications (1.2%) included partial pneumothorax (n = 2), hemorrhage requiring operative control (n = 2), causalgia (n = 1) and embolization (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Whenever percutaneous femoral catheterization cannot be achieved or an alternate access point is indicated, we select the subclavian approach as an alternative to axillary, brachial or translumbar access. It is safe, expeditious, and versatile for virtually all types of systemic and cardiac catheterization; it is also applicable to thrombolysis and balloon angioplasty.

Adult↗

Migraine with aura after intracranial endovascular procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To describe three cases of migraine (two with aura) after an intracranial endovascular procedure. Method.-Retrospective. RESULTS: One patient had an attack of migraine with prolonged aura after embolization of a dural arteriovenous fistula. Another patient had an attack of migraine with aura (and hemiparesis) after a diagnostic angiogram. The third patient already suffered from migraine with aura and had a migraine attack after embolization of an occipital arteriovenous malformation. A quadrantanopia persisted in this patient. Outcome of the other two patients was good. CONCLUSION: Intracranial endovascular procedures can induce migraine with aura. We could not identify the underlying pathophysiological mechanism, but mechanical, chemical, immunological, or hemodynamic factors could be involved.

Adult↗

Efficacy of femoral vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulant, abciximab or thrombolytics during percutaneous endovascular procedures.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the outcomes of using vascular closure devices following percutaneous transfemoral endovascular procedures in the patients who were treated with heparin, abciximab or thrombolytics (urokinase or t-PA) during the procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 28, 2003 to August 31, 2004, we conducted a prospective and randomized study in which 1,676 cases of 1,180 patients were treated with one of the two different closure devices (the collagen plug device was Angio-Seal; the suture-mediated closure device was The Closer S) at the femoral access site after instituting percutaneous endovascular procedures. Among the 1,676 cases, 108 cases (the drug group) were treated with heparin only (n = 94), thrombolytics only (n = 10), heparin and thrombolytics (n = 3), or abciximab and thrombolytics (n = 1) during the procedures; 1,568 cases (the no-drug group) were treated without any medication. We compared the efficacy and complications between the two groups. Of the drug group, 42 cases underwent arterial closures with the collagen plug devices and 66 cases underwent arterial closures with the suture-mediated closure devices. We also compared the efficacy and complications between these two groups. RESULTS: The immediate hemostasis rates were 92.9% (1,456/1,568) in the no-drug group and 91.7% (99/108) in the drug group. Early complications occurred in four cases of the drug group. These included two episodes of rebleeding with using the Closer S, which required manual compression for at least 10 minutes, and two episodes of minor oozing with using one Angio-Seal and one Closer S, which required two hours of additional bed rest. There was no late complication. So, the total success rates were 90.8% (1,423/1,568) in the no-drug group and 88.0% (95/108) in the drug group. These results were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.34). In the drug group, the difference of the successful hemostasis rate between the collagen plug devices and the suture-mediated devices was also not statistically significant (92.9% vs. 84.8%, respectively; p = 0.21). CONCLUSION: Arterial closure of the femoral access site with using vascular closure devices is both safe and effective, even in the patients who received heparin, abciximab or thrombolytics.

Abciximab↗

Results of peripheral endovascular procedures in the operating room.

PURPOSE: This study presents the results of closed (percutaneous) and open endovascular procedures performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the operating room and compares them with results from combined series from the literature, including primarily closed procedures in radiology or cardiology facilities. METHODS: Retrospective review of 607 consecutive peripheral arterial and venous angioplasties, stents, thrombolytic cases, and inferior vena caval filters in 446 patients was analyzed for immediate success rate, complication rate, and 1-year life table patency rate. RESULTS: The incidence of initial technical success was: aorta, 89%; iliac artery, 91%; superficial femoral artery, 90%; popliteal artery, 91%; tibial arteries, 79%; arm arteries and veins, 86%; renal arteries, 100%; IVC filters, 98%; and iliofemoral veins, 100%. The 1-year primary patency rates, including technical failures, were 70.3% in 113 femoropopliteal procedures and 83.7% in 194 iliac arteries. Advantages to the use of the operating room included: (1) simultaneous angioplasty during a bypass operation for abnormalities proximal or distal to the graft, (2) correction of lesions first discovered during thrombectomy, and (3) optimum patient monitoring and sedation in the operating room. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular procedures performed by vascular surgeons in the operating room lead to results comparable with procedures performed in nonsurgical interventional suites, and the use of the operating room has advantages.

Adult↗

Neuroprotective role of neurophysiological monitoring during endovascular procedures in the spinal cord.

The endovascular treatment of spinal vascular malformations places the spinal cord at risk for ischemia. When these procedures are performed using general anesthesia, the neurophysiological monitoring methods currently available provide the only means by which to assess the functional integrity of sensory and motor pathways. Neurophysiological monitoring allows a warning for the neuroradiologist of impending irreversible neurological damage so that action may be taken for the prompt restoration of adequate spinal cord perfusion. Muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) better reflect spinal cord perfusion in the anterior spinal artery territory than do somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), although their use during spinal endovascular procedures remains anecdotal in the literature. In the study reported here we assessed: (1) the feasibility of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, (2) the role of provocative tests with Amytal and Xylocaine, and (3) the specific but complementary role played by SEPs and mMEPs, during endovascular embolization of spinal vascular malformations and tumors. The results suggest that: (1) neurophysiological monitoring is feasible during most endovascular procedures in the spine and spinal cord under general anesthesia, (2) provocative tests enhance the safety of the procedure, (3) mMEPs are more feasible than SEPs and more sensitive than SEPs to provocative tests. We strongly suggest the use of multimodal neurophysiological monitoring and provocative tests during the endovascular treatment of spinal and spinal cord vascular lesions.

Algorithms↗

Predictors of complications after a prospective evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic endovascular procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate complications after diagnostic and therapeutic endovascular procedures (DTEPs) and determine what factors are predictive. METHODS: From December 2002 to December 2003, all patients undergoing DTEPs performed by university vascular surgeons in a catheterization laboratory were prospectively evaluated. Medical demographics, procedure-related details, and type and severity of complications were recorded at the time of the procedure, during the first 24 hours, and at 2 to 4 weeks. Complications were classified as local vascular (LV), local nonvascular (LNV), systemic remote (SR), and major, minor, and nonsignificant. RESULTS: Three hundred-three DTEPs were performed (54.5% DEPs, 45.5% TEPs). At the time of DTEP, 28 complications occurred in 23 patients: 10 LV (3.3%), 15 LNV (5.0%), and 3 SR (1.0%). At 24 hours, 26 complications occurred in 25 patients: 5 LV (1.7%), 7 LNV (2.3%), and 14 SR (4.7%). At 2 to 4 weeks, 26 complications occurred 25 patients: 5 LV (1.7%), 7 LNV (2.3%), and 14 SR (4.7%). The combined major (7.3%) and minor (4.3%) complication rate attributed to DTEPs was 11.6%. Significant predictors (P < .05) by multivariate analysis included thrombolysis, prior stroke, an additional procedure during the study period, and diabetes mellitus (odds ratios: 9.1, 3.2, 2.7, and 2.4, respectively). CONCLUSION: According to newly applied reporting standards, the prospective evaluation of DTEPs reveals that complications are uniformly distributed by type and follow-up period. Just over 1 in 10 patients will suffer either a major or minor complication. Potential predictors have been identified that may assist in patient selection and treatment plans to lower complications resulting from DTEPs.

Adolescent↗

Endovascular procedures, carotid endarterectomies, and aortic surgery should preferentially be done by a vascular trainee rather than a general surgery resident.

This article is the result of a debate. The motion proposed was that "endovascular procedures, carotid endarterectomies, and aortic surgery should be done preferentially by a vascular trainee rather than a general surgery resident.'' Arguments in favor of the motion were that with the development of endovascular surgery, there are now less open vascular procedures to perform and hence, vascular trainees needed to hone their skills on these limited cases rather than waste that experience on a general surgery resident. This focused training experience would allow vascular fellows to be become more highly skilled vascular surgeons. Additionally, endovascular procedures are an important component of modern vascular surgery, and it is important for the vascular fellow to develop significant experience with and acquire the appropriate numbers of endovascular cases to get the necessary credentials when going into a vascular practice. Arguments against the motion were that exposure to vascular cases will make a better general surgeon, one who will also be well equipped to deal with trauma cases and situations where the control of bleeding might be life saving. Additionally, the issue of exposure of general surgery residents to vascular cases might be a positive recruitment strategy for future vascular fellows. The motion was carried by a small majority vote.

Aorta↗

Endovascular procedures for treating wide-necked aneurysms.

Wide-necked aneurysms remain difficult to treat by either open microneurosurgical or endovascular procedures. Recent advances in the latter technology, including intracranial stents and bioactive coils, now allow an endovascular treatment option for cases in which this was not previously available. In this report the authors describe the new developments in endovascular technologies that make the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms possible. This includes discussion of intracranial stents and bioactive coils designed to promote obliteration of the aneurysm lumen. In addition, methods for coil insertion in wide-necked aneurysms are described, including balloon remodeling and various stent placement procedures. Wide-necked aneurysms previously thought to be untreatable by endovascular means can now be obliterated, thanks to new devices specifically designed for intracranial use.

Balloon Occlusion↗

Safety and cost savings of endovascular procedures: are outpatient interventions feasible when combined with open surgery?

As increasing experience and comfort with endovascular interventions performed in an outpatient setting has occurred, the safety and cost effectiveness of performing these procedures without an overnight stay were analyzed, especially when endovascular procedures were combined with open vascular operations requiring an arteriotomy and surgical closure. Ninety patients underwent endovascular procedures alone or concomitantly with open, minor vascular operations to salvage a failing graft between February 1994 and June 1999. Patients undergoing endovascular interventions during primary lower extremity bypass or other major surgical procedures were not included in this review because they were not candidates for outpatient procedures. Balloon angioplasty alone (79) or angioplasty with stent placement (11) was performed to treat stenoses in 50 failing grafts, 16 iliac, 14 femoral, 5 tibial, and 5 axilla/subclavian arteries. A significant increase in outpatient procedures was accomplished as more experience was garnered with these techniques: 19% (8/42) between 1994 and 1996 vs 57% (28/48) between 1997 and 1999 (p = 0.001). Age and comorbidity did not play a role in determining the need for admission because there were no significant differences in patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, or hyperlipidemia and those admitted or discharged the same day (p > 0.05). Patients admitted for overnight observation tended to have longer mean operative times and more complex revascularizations than outpatients (110 vs 69 min, respectively; p < 0.0001). Twenty-seven patients underwent surgical exposure of the access vessel: 63% (17) were admitted and 37% (10) were discharged the same day. Sixty-three patients underwent a percutaneous procedure: 42% (27) were admitted and 58% (37) were discharged the same day. Outpatients were more likely to receive only local anesthesia (83%; 30/35) compared to patients admitted overnight (67%; 36/53); the remaining patients received spinal or epidural anesthesia. Complications included graft thrombosis within 30 days in 6% (5/90) of patients and arterial graft infection in 2% (2). No patient required surgery for bleeding. The average charges for outpatient interventions were $1980 compared to $10,026 for patients who stayed overnight (p < 0.0001). As vascular surgeons become more experienced and comfortable with outpatient endovascular procedures, especially when performed in combination with open minor vascular surgery, significant cost savings can be realized without sacrificing patient safety. Even when open surgical exposure is planned, patients should be instructed preoperatively to anticipate discharge the day of their procedure to minimize resistance to this strategy.

Aged↗

Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: Part I--Pathophysiological and pharmacological features.

Thromboembolic and ischemic complications frequently occur during and after endovascular procedures, because of associated arterial injury and the thrombogenic characteristics of arterial catheters, contrast agents, and implanted devices such as coils and stents. Platelet adhesion, activation, and aggregation occurring at the site of arterial injury are mediated by local factors, including thromboxane A2 (inhibited by aspirin) and adenosine diphosphate (inhibited by ticlopidine and clopidogrel). Concomitantly, thrombin is formed by serial activation of clotting factors via contact with subendothelial tissue factor. Thrombin cleaves fibrinogen into fibrin. Thrombin activation is indirectly blocked by heparin and its analogs. However, after thrombin is clot-bound (with fibrin), it is relatively protected from heparin and is effectively blocked only by direct thrombin inhibitors (hirudin and its analogs). The final common pathway in clot formation is the binding of fibrinogen to platelets via platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors, which is inhibited by antibodies to platelet IIb/IIIa receptors. New treatment modalities, such as the use of direct thrombin inhibitors and antibodies to platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, seem to be more effective for prophylaxis and treatment than conventional anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗

Early inflammatory response after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a comparison between endovascular procedure and conventional surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the nature of and to compare the inflammatory responses induced by (1) endovascular and (2) conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients undergoing elective infrarenal AAA repair were prospectively studied. Seven patients were selected for endovascular procedures (the EAAA group); five patients underwent open surgery (the OAAA group). Three control patients undergoing carotid thromboendarterectomy were also included. Serial peripheral venous blood samples were collected preoperatively, immediately after declamping or placement of the endograft, and at hours 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72. Acute phase response expression of peripheral T lymphocyte and monocyte activation markers and adhesion molecules (flow cytometry), soluble levels of cell adhesion molecules (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), cytokine (tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8) release (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), and liberation of complement products (nephelometry) were measured. RESULTS: Regarding acute phase response, the EAAA and OAAA groups showed significant increases in C-reactive protein (P <.001 and P =.001), body temperature (P =.035 and P =.048), and leukocyte count (P <.001 and P <.001). Similar time course patterns were observed with respect to body temperature (P =.372). Statistically significant different patterns were demonstrated for C-reactive protein (P =.032) and leukocyte count (P =.002). Regarding leukocyte activation, a significant upregulation of peripheral T lymphocyte CD38 expression was observed in the OAAA group only (P =.001). Analysis of markers such as CD69, CD40L, CD25, and CD54 revealed no perioperative fluctuations in any group. Regarding circulating cell adhesion molecules, the EAAA and OAAA groups displayed significant increases in soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (P =.003 and P =.001); there was no intergroup difference (P =.193). All groups demonstrated high soluble von Willebrand factor levels (P =.018, P =. 007, and P =.027), there being no differences in the patterns (P =. 772). Otherwise, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, soluble E-selectin, and soluble P-selectin did not appear to vary in any group. Regarding cytokine release, although a tendency toward high tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-8 levels was noticed in the EAAA group, global time course effects failed to reach statistical significance (P =.543 and P =.080). In contrast, interleukin-6 showed elevations in all groups (P =.058, P <.001, and P =.004). Time course patterns did not differ between the EAAA and OAAA groups (P =.840). Regarding complement activation, the C3d/C3 ratio disclosed significant postoperative elevations in the EAAA and OAAA groups (P =.013 and P =.009). This complement product release was reduced in the EAAA group (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicated that both endovascular and coventional AAA repair induced significant inflammatory responses. Our findings showed that there were no large differences between the procedures with respect to circulating cell adhesion molecule and cytokine release. Moreover, the endoluminal approach produced a limited response in terms of acute phase reaction, T lymphocyte activation, and complement product liberation. This might support the concept that endovascular AAA repair represents an attractive alternative to open surgery. Given the relatively small sample size, further larger studies are required for confirmation of our observations.

Aged↗

Development of "de novo" aneurysms following endovascular procedures.

Two personal cases of "de novo" aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery (ACoA) occurring 9 and 4 years, respectively, after endovascular carotid occlusion are described. A review of the 30 reported cases (including our own two) of "de novo" aneurysms after occlusion of the major cerebral vessels has shown some features, including a rather long time interval after the endovascular procedure of up to 20-25 years (average 9.6 years), a preferential ACoA (36.3%) and internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery (ICA-PCoA) (33.3%) location of the "de novo" aneurysms, and a 10% rate of multiple aneurysms. These data are compared with those of the group of reported spontaneous "de novo" aneurysms after SAH or previous aneurysm clipping. We agree that the frequency of "de novo" aneurysms after major-vessel occlusion (two among ten procedures in our series, or 20%) is higher than commonly reported (0 to 11%). For this reason, we suggest that patients who have been submitted to endovascular major-vessel occlusion be followed up for up to 20-25 years after the procedure, using non-invasive imaging studies such as MR angiography and high-resolution CT angiography. On the other hand, periodic digital angiography has a questionable risk-benefit ratio; it may be used when a "de novo" aneurysm is detected or suspected on non-invasive studies. The progressive enlargement of the ACoA after carotid occlusion, as described in our case 1, must be considered a radiological finding of risk for "de novo" aneurysm formation.

Adult↗