Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Endothelin Receptor Antagonists”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Endothelin receptor antagonists.

Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) have been developed to block the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) in a variety of cardiovascular conditions. ET-1 is a powerful vasoconstrictor with mitogenic or co-mitogenic properties, which acts through the stimulation of 2 subtypes of receptors [endothelin receptor subtype A (ETA) and endothelin receptor subtype B (ETB) receptors]. Endogenous ET-1 is involved in a variety of conditions including systemic and pulmonary hypertension (PH), congestive heart failure (CHF), vascular remodeling (restenosis, atherosclerosis), renal failure, cancer, and cerebrovascular disease. The first dual ETA/ETB receptor blocker, bosentan, has already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Trials of endothelin receptor antagonists in heart failure have been completed with mixed results so far. Studies are ongoing on the effects of selective ETA antagonists or dual ETA/ETB antagonists in lung fibrosis, cancer, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. While non-peptidic ET-1 receptor antagonists suitable for oral intake with excellent bioavailability have become available, proven efficacy is limited to pulmonary hypertension, but it is possible that these agents might find a place in the treatment of several cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases in the coming future.

Animals↗

Effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonist and endothelin receptor antagonist on nitroglycerin tolerance in rats.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether angiotensin II receptor antagonist and endothelin receptor antagonist can improve the nitroglycerin (Nit) tolerance in vivo. METHODS: Twenty-four rats were divided into 4 groups (n = 6, each): Control group, Nitroglycerin (Nit) group, Nit + bosentan group and Nit + losartan group. Nitroglycerin tolerance was induced by 2-day treatment of (10 mg x kg(-1) nitroglycerin patch(0.05 mg/h). Angiotensin receptor antagonist losartan(10 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)) and endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan (100 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)) were given by gavage for 2 days respectively. RESULTS: The least hypotensive response to sodium nitroprusside (SNP) was observed in Nit group. The effective percentages of hypotensive response to SNP were increased in both Nit + losartan group and Nit + bosentan group compared with Nit group [(31.95 +/- 4.45) % vs (21.00 +/- 3.69) %, P < 0.01 and (33.18 +/- 6.16) % vs (21.00 +/- 3.69) %, P < 0.01, respectively]. The maximal vessel relaxation induced by SNP was the same in 4 different groups but the highest EC50 (concentration which produces 50% of the maximal response to SNP) was found in tolerant group[(34 +/- 10) nmol/L, P < 0.01]. The ET-1 amounts in plasma and vascular tissue were markedly increased by 54% and 60% in Nit group compared with those in control group( P < 0.01). The ET-1 amounts in plasma and vascular tissue were decreased by 30% and 37% in Nit + losartan group compared with those in Nit group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Endothelin receptor antagonist and angiotensin II receptor antagonist could prevent against the Nit tolerance.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗

Articular nociception induced by endothelin-1, carrageenan and LPS in naive and previously inflamed knee-joints in the rat: inhibition by endothelin receptor antagonists.

Endothelin-1, unlike the selective endothelin ETB receptor agonist sarafotoxin S6c, causes nociception in the rat when injected intraarticularly into the naive knee-joint. By using selective antagonists, the present study further characterizes the receptors underlying the articular nociceptive actions of endothelin-1, as well as the possible contribution of endogenous endothelins towards nociception induced by carrageenan or E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in this tissue. Nociception was evaluated by placing the animal for 1 min each hour on a revolving (3 rpm) cylinder and measuring the increase in time the hindpaw of the limb affected by the intra-articular (i.a.) injection of the nociceptive agent, failed to touch its metallic surface (i.e. paw elevation time, PET). In naive joints, endothelin-1 (120 pmol) increased the area under the PET curve (AUC 0-6 h, in arbitrary units) from 61+/-3 (control) to 156+/-12. This nociceptive effect was reduced by prior intravenous (i.v.) injection of the mixed ET(A)/ET(B)receptor antagonist bosentan (by 54 and 73% with 10 and 30 mg/kg) or i.a. administration of the selective ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123 (cyclo [D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu]; by approximately/= 45% with 10 or 30 nmol), but was unaffected by the selective ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ-788 (N-cis-2,6-dimethyl-piperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methoxycarbonyl- tryptophanil-D-norleucine; 10 nmol). Prior joint challenge with carrageenan (300 microg) 72 h beforehand (i.e. priming) rendered the joint more sensitive to nociception induced by either endothelin-1 or sarafotoxin S6c (15, 30 and 60 pmol). Responses elicited by endothelin (30 pmol) in the primed joint were sensitive to inhibition by either BQ-123 or BQ-788 (each causing approximately/= 80% inhibition at 10 nmol). Priming also enhanced PET responses to carrageenan itself and to LPS (1 microg) markedly and persistently, increasing the area under the curve (AUC 0-12 h, in arbitrary units) from 241+/-19 to 409+/-50 and from 312+/-40 to 466+/-25, respectively (P < 0.05), without changing that measured following vehicle injection (from 121+/-3 to 117+/-4). Bosentan (up to 30 mg/kg, i.v.) failed to modify nociception caused by carrageenan or LPS in naive joints, by carrageenan in the primed joint, or control PET responses. LPS-induced nociception in the primed joint, however, was inhibited by 52 to 56% by bosentan (3 or 10 mg/kg) or 59% by local injection of the selective endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ-788 (10 nmol, i.a.), but was unaffected by the selective endothelin ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123. Thus, nociception induced by endothelin-1 in the naive joint is mediated largely via endothelin ETA receptors, whereas both ET(A)and ET(B) receptors contribute to its action in the carrageenan-primed joint. Furthermore, LPS-induced nociception in the primed joint is mediated to a large extent via endothelin release and activation of ET(B) receptors within the joint itself. These findings may be relevant to the etiology of pain underlying chronic arthritic disease in humans.

Animals↗

Nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonists. IX. Characterization of endothelin receptors in guinea pig bronchus with SB 209670 and other endothelin receptor antagonists.

In this study the endothelin (ET) receptors mediating contractions produced by ET-1, ET-3 and the selective ET(B) ligands sarafotoxin 6c (S6c) and BQ-3020 in guinea pig bronchus were investigated using SB 209670, a nonpeptide, mixed ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist, and the peptide ET receptor antagonists BQ-123 (ET(A) receptor-selective), BQ-788 (ET(B) receptor-selective) and RES-701 (ET(B) receptor-selective). SB 209670 (10 microM) antagonized concentrations induced by ET-1 (pK(B) = 6.1). In contrast, BQ-788 (10 microM) and BQ-123 (10 microM), either alone or in combination, were without significant effect on ET-1 concentration-response curves. SB 209670 (10 microM) and BQ-788 (10 microM) antagonized S6c concentration-response curves with pKB values of 6.6 and 5.5, respectively, whereas RES-701 (10 microM) and BQ-123 (10 microM) were without effect. SB 209670 (10 microM) was about a 10-fold less potent antagonist of contractions produced by ET-3 (pK(B) = 5.4) than of those elicited by S6c. BQ-788 (10 microM), RES-701 (10 microM) and BQ-123 (10 microM) were without effect on ET-3 concentration-response curves. BQ-788 (10 microM) had similar potencies for inhibition of contractions induced by S6c (pK(B) = 5.8) and BQ-3020 (pK(B) = 6.25). These data indicate that contractions induced by ET-1, ET-3, S6c and BQ-3020 in guinea pig bronchus appear to be mediated predominantly via stimulation of ET(B) receptors. However, these receptors are not very sensitive to the standard ET(B) receptor antagonists BQ-788 and RES-701, which suggests that responses produced by these ligands in this tissue involve activation not of the classical ET(B) receptor, but rather of an atypical ET receptor population. The results also provide additional evidence that the potencies of ET receptor antagonists depend upon the specific ET agonist.

Animals↗

[Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: endothelin-receptor antagonists].

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is of significance in the pathophysiology and prognosis of pulmonary hypertension (PHT). Bosentan, an endothelin-receptor antagonist, currently plays a central role in the treatment of PHT, because it improves exercise capacity, hemodynamics, clinical symptoms and right ventricular function, achieving a survival duration of 2- 3 years. Bosentan causes an increase of transaminases in about 10% of patients, but this effect is reversible on dosage reduction or discontinuing the medication. However, transaminases should be measured every 4 weeks while patients are on bosentan. Almost all current guidelines list bosentan as of equal value to sildenafil or prostacyclin analogues in the first-line treatment of patients in NYHA functional class III and also, with narrower indications, of those in class IV.

Algorithms↗

COS-7 cells stably transfected to express the human ETB receptor provide a useful screen for endothelin receptor antagonists.

Endothelin acts via specific membrane-bound receptors through signal transduction pathways that include increases in intracellular free calcium and inositol triphosphate generation. Two endothelin receptors have been cloned. The ETA receptor is ET-1 selective, and the ETB receptor is isopeptide nonselective. Both receptor subtypes are widely distributed throughout the body, although ETA receptors predominate in vascular smooth muscle, whereas ETB receptors predominate in the brain. The presence of mixed receptor subtypes makes functional screening of subtype-specific analogues difficult. A eukaryotic expression vector was constructed by inserting the cloned coding region of the human ETB receptor downstream from the Rous sarcoma promoter. COS-7 cells were transfected with this construct, and cell lines were isolated with stably integrated copies of the relevant gene. One line, 1C7, was shown to specifically bind 125I-ET-1. Scatchard analysis indicated a Kd value of 8.8 pM and a Bmax value of 1.02 pM/mg. ET-1 stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in a dose-dependent manner, as did ET-3, sarafotoxin 6c, and [1,3,13,15Ala]ET-1, whereas BQ123, a selective ETA receptor antagonist, did not inhibit the action of ET-1. The transfected receptor stimulates phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis via a pertussis-sensitive pathway. Pretreatment of the membrane from 1C7 cells with dithio-bis-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) a negatively charged, nonpenetrating agent capable of oxidizing sulfhydryl groups, and N-ethyl-maleimide (NEM), a penetrating agent that causes irreversible alkylation of sulfhydryl groups, significantly reduces Bmax but has no effect on Kd. In whole cells, DTNB pretreatment abolishes the ability of ET-1 to stimulate PI hydrolysis.

Avian Sarcoma Viruses↗

In vitro stability and intestinal absorption characteristics of hexapeptide endothelin receptor antagonists.

Endothelins are potent vasoconstrictor peptides which have a wide range of tissue distribution and three receptor subtypes (ET(A), ET(B) and ET(C)). Among the linear hexapeptide ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists, PD 145065 (Ac-D-Bhg-L-Leu-L-Asp-L-Ile-L-Ile-L-Trp, Bhg = (10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5-yl)-Gly) and PD 156252 (Ac-D-Bhg-L-Leu-L-Asp-L-Ile-(N-methyl)-L-Ile-L-Trp) were selected to evaluate the metabolic stability and intestinal absorption in the absence and/or in the presence of protease inhibitors. In vitro stability of both compounds was investigated in fresh plasma, lumenal perfusate, intestinal and liver homogenates. PD 156252 was more stable than PD 145065 in intestinal tissue homogenate (63.4% vs. 20.5% remaining) and liver homogenate (74.4% vs. 35.5% remaining), while both compounds showed relatively good stability in the fresh plasma (94.5% vs. 86.7% remaining) and lumenal perfusate (85.8% vs. 72.3% remaining). The effect of protease inhibitors on the degradation of PD 145065 and PD 156252 was also investigated. Amastatin, thiorphan, chymostatin and the mixture of these three inhibitors were effective in reducing the degradation of both compounds. The pharmacokinetic parameters of PD 156252, calculated by using a non-compartmental model, were 6.95 min (terminal half-life), 191 mL (Vss), and 25.5 mL/min (Cl(tot)) after intravenous administration in rats. The intestinal absorption of PD 156252 in rats was evaluated in the absence and/or in the presence of protease inhibitors. The results indicate that the major elimination pathway of PD 156252 appears to be the biliary excretion and protease inhibitors increase the intestinal absorption of PD 156252 through increasing metabolic stability.

Animals↗

Endothelin receptor antagonists inhibit endothelin in human skin microcirculation.

Endothelin is a potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by endothelial cells, but its role in physiology and disease is uncertain. We investigated the influence of the endothelin-A-selective receptor antagonist PD 147953 and the nonselective endothelin receptor antagonist PD 145065 on the effects of endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 in the skin microcirculation of healthy volunteers, using laser Doppler flowmetry. A double injection model was developed, allowing simultaneous injection of two substances, ie, agonist and antagonist or saline. The injection of saline led to a well-defined vasodilation at the injection site (maximum increase, from 19 +/- 2 to 97 +/- 15 perfusion units at 6 minutes; P < .001; n = 10). Endothelin-1 (10(-12) mol) decreased blood flow (difference from saline control, -79 +/- 14 perfusion units; P < .001; n = 11) within the injection wheal (diameter, 4 to 5 mm), while endothelin-3 had no effect. In the surrounding area (at 8 mm from the injection site), both endothelin-1 (+116 +/- 32 perfusion units; P < .001; n = 11) and endothelin-3 (+59 +/- 16 perfusion units; P < .001; n = 11) markedly increased blood flow. Both endothelin receptor antagonists slightly increased blood flow (maximum difference from control, +56 +/- 18 [PD 147953] and +31 +/- 10 [PD 145065] perfusion units; P < .05; n = 8) and inhibited endothelin-1-induced (P < .01) vasoconstriction. The vasoconstriction to norepinephrine was not affected by the endothelin antagonist PD 147953. Endothelin-1- and endothelin-3-induced vasodilation in the surrounding area were also inhibited by both endothelin antagonists or by lidocaine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonists. X. Inhibition of endothelin-1- and hypoxia-induced pulmonary pressor responses in the guinea pig by the endothelin receptor antagonist, SB 217242.

This study investigated the effects of the nonpeptide endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist, SB 217242, against ET-1-induced pulmonary pressor responses and in a model of hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension in the guinea pig. In guinea pig isolated pulmonary artery rings, SB 217242 (3-300 nM) produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of ET-1-induced contractions, with a pA2 of 8.1. SB 217242 (1 or 3 mg/kg i.v.) elicited a dose-related inhibition of ET-1-induced increases in pulmonary artery and airway insufflation pressure responses in anesthetized guinea pigs. Chronic exposure to hypoxia (9% O2 for 0-14 days) produced a time-dependent increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure. After a 10-day exposure to hypoxia there was about a 100% elevation in pulmonary artery pressure, and right ventricular mass and plasma irET levels increased 3-fold compared with normoxic animals. SB 217242, administered by continuous intraperitoneal infusion via mini osmotic pump (0.36, 3.6 or 10.8 mg/day), significantly reduced (by about 50%) hypoxia-induced pulmonary artery pressure increases at all three doses used. The hypoxia-induced right ventricular hypertrophy was significantly attenuated by the 3.6 and 10.8 mg/day doses. Based on hematocrit, hemoglobin and red blood cell counts, SB 217242 did not affect the normal physiological erythropoietic response to hypoxia. There were no appreciable differences in the maximum contractile effects of ET-1 or the potency of SB 217242 (pKB values, 8.3 and 8.0, respectively) versus ET-1-induced responses in isolated pulmonary arteries from hypoxic versus normoxic guinea pigs. However, there was a marked reduction in endothelium-dependent relaxation of precontracted pulmonary artery isolated from hypoxic compared with normoxic animals. The results of the present study provide further preclinical evidence for a pathophysiological role of ET-1 and the potential therapeutic utility of ET receptor antagonists, such as SB 217242, in pulmonary hypertension.

Animals↗

Nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonists. VII: Binding characteristics of [3H]SB 209670, a novel nonpeptide antagonist of endothelin receptors.

The data presented in this manuscript describes the binding characteristics of [3H]SB 209670, a potent nonpeptide tritium-labeled endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist. The binding of this antagonist to cloned human ETA and ETB receptors was specific, saturable and of high affinity. The apparent dissociation constants were 0.20 and 1.0 nM for ETA and ETB receptors, respectively. The maximum binding was 4.7 and 22.5 pmol/mg protein for ETA and ETB receptors, respectively. Unlike [125]ET-1, the binding of [3H]SB 209670 was reversible. The half-times (T1/2) for dissociation of this ligand from ETA and ETB receptors were approximately 60 and 10 min, respectively. Competition binding studies using [3H]SB 209670 and unlabeled agonists ET-1, ET-3 and S6c indicated that these agonists displayed similar affinities for human ETB receptors, whereas with ETA receptors, ET-1 was approximately 50-fold and 1500-fold more potent than ET-3 and S6c, respectively. Of the peptide antagonists tested, BQ123 (ETA-selective peptide antagonist), displayed Ki values of 40 and > 2300 nM for ETA and ETB, whereas RES701 (ETB-selective antagonist) displayed Ki values of > 1600 and 81 nM for ETA and ETB receptors, respectively. The nonselective peptide antagonist, PD 142893, was approximately 2-fold more potent for ETA compared with ETB receptors. Similar observations were made with nonselective nonpeptide antagonists, Bosentan, (+/-) SB 209670, SB 209670, and (-) SB 209670. All these compounds were 2 to 10 times more potent for ETA than ETB receptors.

Animals↗

Effects of endothelin receptor antagonists on endothelin-1 and inducible nitric oxide synthase genes in a rat endotoxic shock model.

Levels of the endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor endothelin (ET)-1 and the vasodilator nitric oxide (NO) are markedly increased in endotoxic shock, although the pathophysiological role of ET-1 and its relation to NO under septic conditions remains obscure. To delineate the roles of ET-1 and the ET receptors, and the NO/inducible NO synthase (iNOS) system in endotoxic shock, we examined the gene expression of ET-1, ET receptors A and B (ETA and ETB) and iNOS in the heart and the liver of a rat endotoxic shock model, and we studied the effects of ET receptor antagonists on haemodynamics, survival rate and expression of ET-1, ET receptors and iNOS. Administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) into rats caused a profound hypotension with resultant death. However, these effects were blocked by a non-selective ETA/ETB receptor antagonist (TAK044), but not by an ETA-selective antagonist (BQ123). Injection of LPS caused a marked elevation in the plasma levels of both ET-1 and NO, which were not affected by treatment with either ET receptor antagonist. Administration of LPS caused increases in levels of ET-1, ETB and iNOS mRNA in the heart and the liver, whereas ETA mRNA expression was markedly downregulated in these organs. These results suggest that ET receptor subtype genes are differentially regulated in major organs from endotoxic shock rats, and that non-selective ET receptor antagonists ameliorate endotoxin-induced hypotension and death irrespective of iNOS-derived NO.

Animals↗

Nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonists. VI: Pharmacological characterization of SB 217242, a potent and highly bioavailable endothelin receptor antagonist.

This study describes the pharmacological characterization of SB 217242, a highly potent orally bioavailable nonpeptide antagonist of both endothelin type A (ETA) and endothelin type B (ETB) receptors. In human cloned ETA and ETB receptors, SB 217242 produced concentration-dependent displacement of [125]I-endothelin-1 (ET-1) in both receptor subtypes with Ki values of 1.1 and 111 nM, respectively. SB 217242 produced concentration-dependent, parallel rightward shifts in the ET-1 concentration-response curves in rat isolated aorta and human isolated pulmonary artery (ETA receptor-mediated vascular contraction) with Kb values of 4.4 and 5.0 nM, respectively. SB 217242 was 4-, 62- and 125-fold more potent as an ETA receptor antagonist than the previously reported compounds BQ-123, PD 142893 and Ro 46-2005, respectively. SB 217242 (10 microM) did not produce significant effects against contraction produced by other vasoactive agents. SB 217242 produced concentration-dependent antagonism of responses produced by ETB receptor activation as demonstrated by antagonism of sarafotoxin S6c-mediated contraction in the rabbit isolated pulmonary artery with a Kb value of 352 nM. In vitro cell monolayers of Caco-2 cells had high permeability to SB 217242. In vivo pharmacokinetics in the rat confirmed that SB 217242 was rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract with a bioavailability of 66%. The SB 217242 plasma half-life in rats after intraduodenal administration was 3.3 hr, with a systemic clearance of 27.3 ml/min/kg. Orally administered SB 217242 (0.3-30 mg/kg) produced dose-dependent inhibition of the pressor response to exogenous ET-1 in conscious rats; with a dose of 30 mg/kg p.o., inhibition was observed for at least 5.5 hr. The present study demonstrates that SB 217242 is a highly potent antagonist of both ETA and ETB receptors. In addition, SB 217242 has high in vitro permeability and high oral bioavailability. SB 217242 represents a new orally active pharmacological tool that should assist in the elucidation of the chronic role of endothelin in pathophysiology.

Animals↗

The renoprotective potential of endothelin receptor antagonists.

The endothelin system has been identified as having a substantial role in renal failure, both acute and chronic. Beside its well characterised haemodynamic effects, its mitogenic and pro-fibrotic properties have gained increased interest in the pathophysiology of chronic renal failure. This review outlines the role of endothelin in the pathogenesis of various renal diseases with a special focus on the potential of blocking this system with endothelin receptor antagonists. So far, most data were derived from animal models, but they provide strong evidence that endothelin receptor antagonists may represent a powerful therapeutic strategy in ameliorating the course of acute and chronic renal failure.

Animals↗

An update on the status of endothelin receptor antagonists for hypertension.

Endothelin receptor antagonists (ETRA) are actively developed by the pharmaceutical industry for several cardiovascular indications. In the context of hypertension, preclinical studies are increasingly focused on prevention or regression of end-organ damage and drug combination than on control of arterial pressure in monotherapy, as most experimental models have already been studied. In general, the antihypertensive effect of ETRA is limited but the overwhelming efficacy of this class of drugs to prevent several end-organ damages warrants judicious combination. However, the few studies looking at regression of hypertension-induced cardiovascular alterations proved less successful, suggesting that ETRA should be used early in the treatment of hypertension to obtain full benefit. Judging from the progression of ongoing trials and the development of new trials patients suffering from pulmonary hypertension and heart failure may be the first to benefit from this new class of drugs. However, it is expected that once on the market, responsive subsets of hypertensive patients will be identified and will benefit from end-organ protection.

Animals↗

Receptor binding and antagonist properties of a novel endothelin receptor antagonist, TAK-044 [cyclo[D-alpha-aspartyl-3-[(4-phenylpiperazin-1-yl) carbonyl]-L-alanyl-L-alpha-aspartyl-D-2-(2-thienyl) glycyl-L-leucyl-D-tryptophyl]disodium salt], in human endothelinA and endothelinB receptors.

Receptor binding and antagonist properties of an endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist, TAK-044 ¿cyclo[D-alpha-aspartyl-3-[(4-phenylpiperazin-1-yl) carbonyl]-L-alanyl-L-alpha-aspartylD-2-(2-thienyl) glycyl-L-leucyl-D-tryptophyl]disodium salt¿, were investigated using recombinant human ETA and ETB receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The membranous ETA receptor was shown to be heterogeneous in ET-3 binding affinity (Hill coefficient = 0.54, Kd1 = 390 pM and Kd2 = 8.1 nM). This heterogeneity disappeared upon the addition of guanosine-5'-O-3-thiotriphosphate (Hill coefficient = 0.95, Kd = 7.8 nM). The Kd (from a computer program LIGAND analysis) and Ki (from Dixon plot analysis) values of TAK-044 were 95 and 120 pM for the membranous ETA receptor and 41 and 60 nM for the ETB receptor, respectively. The Kd values of TAK-044 for the ETA receptor was comparable to that of ET-1. The Ki values of TAK-044 for the cellular ETA and ETB receptors were 130 pM and 130 nM at 5,000 cells/well and 1.3 and 590 nM at 50,000 cells/well, respectively. Dixon plot analysis indicated that TAK-044 is a competitive inhibitor of ET-1 binding. TAK-044 inhibited ET-1-induced phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and arachidonic acid release at 50,000 cells/well in a competitive manner with respective pA2 values of 8.5 and 8.7 in the ETA-expressing cells and 7.4 and 6.6 in the ETB-expressing cells. TAK-044 suppressed ET-1-induced transient increase in intracellular Ca+2 concentration in the ETA- and ETB-expressing cells with respective IC50 values of 2.8 and 230 nM. TAK-044 is a potent and competitive ETA receptor antagonist which simultaneously exhibits definite antagonist activity at the ETB receptor.

Animals↗

Effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a calcium antagonist, and an endothelin receptor antagonist on renal afferent arteriolar structure.

Narrowed afferent arteriolar diameter in young, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) may be a contributor to later development of high blood pressure. Thus, treatment that causes dilation of the afferent arterioles in SHR may inhibit the redevelopment of high blood pressure when treatment is withdrawn. We treated SHR with an ACE inhibitor (cilazapril, 5 to 10 mg/kg per day, high; 1 mg/kg per day, low), a calcium antagonist (mibefradil, 20 to 30 mg/kg per day), and an endothelin receptor antagonist (bosentan, 100 mg/kg per day) from age 4 to 20 weeks. Untreated SHR and Wistar-Kyoto rats were also investigated. At 20 weeks, the rats were killed, and morphology of the afferent arterioles was studied. Other SHR (untreated, high cilazapril, low cilazapril, mibefradil) were treated in exactly the same way and then followed to 32 weeks without treatment. The morphometric studies showed that cilazapril increased the lumen diameter in the afferent arterioles and decreased the media-lumen ratio in a dose-dependent manner. On withdrawal of cilazapril treatment, the reduction in blood pressure persisted. Mibefradil tended to increase afferent arteriolar diameter, whereas it did not alter media-lumen ratio. The persistent effect on blood pressure was only moderate after withdrawal of mibefradil. Bosentan had no effect on renal afferent arteriolar structure or blood pressure. In conclusion, cilazapril was more effective than mibefradil in altering afferent arteriolar structure and caused the most persistent effect on blood pressure after treatment withdrawal. The association of increased afferent arteriolar diameter and lower blood pressure level after withdrawal of treatment may suggest a pathogenic role for afferent arteriolar diameter in the development of high blood pressure in SHR.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

Pharmacological characterization of TA-0201, an endothelin receptor antagonist, with recombinant and human prostate endothelin receptors.

The pharmacological profile of N-(6-(2-(5-bromopyrimidine-2-yloxy)ethoxy)-5-(4-methylphenyl)pyrimidin-4-yl)-4-(2-hydroxy-1,1-dimethylethyl) benzensulfonamide sodium salt sesquihydrate (TA-0201), a new antagonist of endothelin receptors, was examined, using human recombinant and prostate endothelin receptors. In binding experiments with [125I]endothelin-1, TA-0201 showed extremely high affinity for recombinant endothelin ET(A) receptors (pK(i)=10.7), as compared with that for recombinant endothelin ET(B) receptors (pK(i)=7.8). Endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors coexisted in human prostate with different proportions (endothelin ET(A) receptor: approximately 70%), which were distinguished by TA-0201 in the same manner as with recombinant receptors. Human prostate strips contracted in response to endothelin-1 and sorafotoxin S6c, but the maximum contraction induced by endothelin-1 was approximately three times greater than that induced by sarafotoxin S6c. The response to endothelin-1, but not to sarafotoxin S6c, was inhibited by TA-0201 and cyclo(D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu-D-Trp) (BQ123) (endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist) but not by BQ788 (endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist). These results suggest that TA-0201 is a highly selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist and will be useful for understanding the physiological and pathological roles of the endothelin ET(A) receptor in human prostate and other tissues.

Animals↗

In vivo pharmacology of Ro 46-2005, the first synthetic nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonist: implications for endothelin physiology.

Ro 46-2005 is a small-molecular-weight nonpeptide antagonist of the endothelin (ET), ETA and ETB receptors, chemically derived from a class of compounds identified by systematic screening of chemicals. In vivo, Ro 46-2005 inhibited the depressor and, only at high doses (100 mg/kg i.v.) the pressor effect of ET-1. However, much lower doses (1 to 10 mg/kg i.v.) were sufficient to inhibit the pressor effect of the precursor big ET-1. As intravenous big ET-1 injection potentially reproduces better than ET-1 injection the physiological pattern of release of ET-1, we propose that intravenous big ET-1 should be used to evaluate the effects of antagonists on the constricting endothelin receptors.

Anesthesia↗