Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “E2F4 Transcription Factor”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

[Differences in human and rat FSH receptors promote activity as a result of the transcriptional factors: E2F1, E2F4 and E2F5 overexpression].

UNLABELLED: FSH-R expression in granulosa cells varies during the course of ovarian ontogenesis, as well as, during each menstrual cycle. Expression of follicle-stimulating hormone receptors (FSH-R) on Sertoli cells of the testis and ovarian granulosa cells depend on many paracrine and autocrine factors. The modulation of FSH-R synthesis is accomplished via a number of mechanisms including regulation of the promoter activity. Little is known about factors involved in control of FSH-R transcription in different species. The aim of the present study was to investigate differences in the regulation of human and rat FSH-R promoter activity by E2F transcriptional factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The 5'-flanking regions of human and rat FSH receptor gene subcloned in the pGL3 plasmid were transiently transfected into cultured CHO cells and rat granulosa cells. Rat granulosa cells were obtained by puncturing ovaries from DES primed immature Sprague-Dawley rats. Promoter activity was determined by measuring firefly luciferase luminescence of the cell lysate. Transfection efficiency was normalized by the renilla luciferase activity generated by co-transfected pRL-CMV vector. In order to determine the influence of E2F1, E2F4 and E2F5, on FSH-R promoter activity, cells were transfected either with promoter construct alone or with its mixture with selected expression vector. RESULTS: Rat FSH-R promoter construct (-1033/+6 bp) and human FSH-R promoter construct (-1485/-1 bp) were both active in transfected cells. Overexpression of E2F1 protein decreased both, human and rat wild type FSH-R promoter activity. Overexpression of E2F4 did not affect neither rat nor human FSH-R gene transcription. Expression vector for E2F5 increased both, human and rat, FSH-R promoter activity. Folds of increase were markedly higher in case of rat FSH-R construct transfection, comparing to human FSH-R promoter. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest, that the E2F1 and E2F5 factors might play an opposite role in the regulation of FSH-R promoter activity. More pronounced stimulatory effect of E2F5 on the rat FSH-R can be explained by the presence of E2F site in the promoter. Since there is no E2F sensitive element in the human FSH-R promoter sequence, E2F1 and E2F5 can also indirectly influence FSH-R promoter activity.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Expression of MCM10 and TopBP1 is regulated by cell proliferation and UV irradiation via the E2F transcription factor.

MCM10 and TopBP1 function in the initiation of DNA replication, by regulating the chromatin binding of the DNA polymerase alpha loading factor, CDC45. TopBP1 is also known as a DNA damage response protein. In this study, we showed that the transcription of human MCM10 and TopBP1 is activated by transcription factors E2F1-3, but not by factors E2F4-7. Analysis of various MCM10 and TopBP1 promoter constructs showed that an E2F-responsive sequence in the vicinity of the transcription initiation site is necessary for the E2F1-induced activation of MCM10 and TopBP1 gene transcription, which is further suppressed by pRb. The promoter activities of human MCM10 and TopBP1 were demonstrated to be growth dependent via the E2F-responsive sequence. Although E2F1 was stabilized by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, the mRNA expression level of TopBP1 was suppressed in HCT116 human diploid colon cancer cells. We showed, by performing chromatin immunoprecipitation that, in response to UV irradiation but not doxorubicin treatment, E2F4 accumulated on the MCM10 and TopBP1 promoters. Our data suggest a model in which UV irradiation-induced DNA damage depends, at least in part, on the accumulation of the E2F4 transcription factor on the MCM10 and TopBP1 promoters, which results in suppression of DNA replication.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2002

E2F integrates cell cycle progression with DNA repair, replication, and G(2)/M checkpoints.

The E2F transcription factor family is known to play a key role in the timely expression of genes required for cell cycle progression and proliferation, but only a few E2F target genes have been identified. We explored the possibility that E2F regulators play a broader role by identifying additional genes bound by E2F in living human cells. A protocol was developed to identify genomic binding sites for DNA-binding factors in mammalian cells that combines immunoprecipitation of cross-linked protein-DNA complexes with DNA microarray analysis. Among approximately 1200 genes expressed during cell cycle entry, we found that the promoters of 127 were bound by the E2F4 transcription factor in primary fibroblasts. A subset of these targets was also bound by E2F1. Most previously identified target genes known to have roles in DNA replication and cell cycle control and represented on the microarray were confirmed by this analysis. We also identified a remarkable cadre of genes with no previous connection to E2F regulation, including genes that encode components of the DNA damage checkpoint and repair pathways, as well as factors involved in chromatin assembly/condensation, chromosome segregation, and the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Our data indicate that E2F directly links cell cycle progression with the coordinate regulation of genes essential for both the synthesis of DNA as well as its surveillance.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2003

S Phase-specific transcription of the mouse ribonucleotide reductase R2 gene requires both a proximal repressive E2F-binding site and an upstream promoter activating region.

Ribonucleotide reductase is essential for supplying a balanced pool of the four deoxyribonucleotides required for DNA synthesis and repair. The active enzyme consists of two non-identical subunits called proteins R1 and R2. There are multiple levels of regulation of ribonucleotide reductase activity, which is highest during the S and G(2) phases of an unperturbed cell cycle in mammalian cells. Previous reports in the literature have indicated that the S phase-specific transcription of the mammalian R2 gene is regulated by a transcriptional block, is dependent on the transcription factor E2F1, or is simply regulated by proteins that bind to promoter CCAAT boxes plus the TATA box. Here, we demonstrate that the S phase-specific transcription of the mouse R2 gene is dependent on an upstream promoter activating region (located at nucleotides (nt) -672 to -527 from the transcription start site) and one proximal promoter repressive element (located at nt -112 to -107) that binds E2F4. Binding to the E2F site is modulated by binding of nuclear factor-Y to an adjacent CCAAT element (nt -79 to -75). The upstream activating region is crucial for overall R2 promoter activity. Mutation of the E2F-binding site leads to premature promoter activation in G(1) and increases overall promoter activity but only when the upstream activating region is present and intact. Therefore, E2F-dependent repression is essential for cell cycle-specific R2 transcription.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Repression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene expression by E2F4 in skeletal muscle cells.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene expression is positively and negatively regulated during muscle differentiation. We recently reported that FGFR1 gene expression was up-regulated by Sp transcription factors in proliferating myoblasts. However, the mechanism of down-regulation of this gene during differentiation is unknown. We have identified the transcription factor E2F4 as a negative regulator of FGFR1 gene expression. Immunodetection studies revealed that endogenous E2F1 and E2F2 proteins were cytoplasmic in myoblasts and myotubes, whereas E2F4 was abundant in the nuclei of both. Upon overexpression, E2F4 repressed FGFR1 promoter activity in a dose-dependent manner in myoblasts and Drosophila SL2 cells, and mutation of the E2F4 binding site increased FGFR1 promoter activity and reduced E2F4-mediated repression. Gel shift assays detected E2F4 binding to a synthetic FGFR1 E2F4 binding site and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays detected E2F4 binding to the endogenous FGFR1 promoter in proliferating myoblasts and myotubes. The results indicate that FGFR1 promoter activity in skeletal muscle cells is repressed by E2F4.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Atypical transcriptional regulators and cofactors of PPARgamma.

Regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) activity is the result of several events. The first control level is the regulation of the expression of PPARgamma. Examples of this regulation, during adipogenesis, is the transactivation of the PPARgamma promoter by transcription factors of the classical pathway, such as C/EBPs or ADD1/SREBP1, but also newly identified factors, such as E2Fs. When preadipocytes re-enter the cell cycle, PPARgamma expression is induced coincident with an increase in DNA synthesis, suggesting the involvement of the E2F family of cell cycle regulators. E2F1 induces PPARgamma transcription during clonal expansion, whereas E2F4 represses PPARgamma expression during terminal adipocyte differentiation. Hence, E2Fs represent the link between proliferative signaling pathways, triggering clonal expansion, and terminal adipocyte differentiation through regulation of PPARgamma expression. A second regulatory level of PPARgamma action is interaction with cofactors. We will focus our attention on the atypical PPARgamma modulators. We have described an interaction between PPARgamma and the retinoblastoma protein, RB, which is both dependent upon ligand binding by PPARgamma and upon the phosphorylation status of RB. The interaction between PPARgamma and RB decreases the transcriptional activity of PPARgamma through recruitment of the histone deacetylase HDAC3. Inhibition of HDAC activity consequently results in a strong activation of PPARgamma.

Adipocytes↗
PubMed2006

JPO1/CDCA7, a novel transcription factor E2F1-induced protein, possesses intrinsic transcriptional regulator activity.

JPO1/CDCA7 was originally identified as a c-Myc-responsive gene that participates in neoplastic transformation. Here, we report the identification of JPO1/CDCA7 as a direct transcriptional target of transcription factor E2F1. We demonstrated that overexpression of E2F1 by adenoviral-mediated gene transfer upregulated JPO1/CDCA7 mRNA expression in human cells. Analysis of human and mouse JPO1/CDCA7 promoter constructs showed that an E2F-responsive sequence was necessary for E2F1-induced activation of the JPO1/CDCA7 gene transcription. Among the members of the E2F family, E2F1 to E2F4, but not E2F5 or E2F6, activated the JPO1/CDCA7 reporter construct. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis demonstrated that E2F1, E2F2, and E2F4 specifically bound to an E2F-responsive sequence of the human JPO1/CDCA7 gene. Like JPO2/R1, which has a homologous transcriptional regulator domain, the C-terminal cysteine-rich region of JPO1/CDCA7 protein induced transcriptional activity in a mammalian one-hybrid assay. Taken together, our results suggest that JPO1/CDCA7 is a unique transcription regulator whose expression is activated by E2F1 as well as c-Myc.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Cloning and characterization of mouse E2F8, a novel mammalian E2F family member capable of blocking cellular proliferation.

The E2F transcription factor family plays a crucial and well established role in cell cycle progression. Deregulation of E2F activities in vivo leads to developmental defects and cancer. Based on current evidence in the field, mammalian E2Fs can be functionally categorized into either transcriptional activators (E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3a) or repressors (E2F3b, E2F4, E2F5, E2F6, and E2F7). We have identified a novel E2F family member, E2F8, which is conserved in mice and humans and has its counterpart in Arabidopsis thaliana (E2Ls). Interestingly, E2F7 and E2F8 share unique structural features that distinguish them from other mammalian E2F repressor members, including the presence of two distinct DNA-binding domains and the absence of DP-dimerization, retinoblastoma-binding, and transcriptional activation domains. Similar to E2F7, overexpression of E2F8 significantly slows down the proliferation of primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts. These observations, together with the fact that E2F7 and E2F8 can homodimerize and are expressed in the same adult tissues, suggest that they may have overlapping and perhaps synergistic roles in the control of cellular proliferation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1998

Differential activities of E2F family members: unique functions in regulating transcription.

Several regulators of E2F transcriptional activity, including the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (Rb) protein, p16Ink4a, cyclin D1, and cyclin-dependent kinase 4, have been shown to be targets for genetic alterations that underlie the development of human cancers. Deregulation of E2F transcription factors as a result of these genetic alterations is believed to contribute to tumor development. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that at least some members of the E2F gene family can contribute to oncogenic transformation when overexpressed. Each E2F family member can dimerize with DP proteins, bind consensus E2F sites, and activate transcription. Several pieces of evidence suggest, however, that the various E2F species have unique functions in regulating transcription. We compared the abilities of E2F1, E2F4, and E2F5 to activate transcription from a variety of gene promoters and found that in all cases E2F1 was the most potent activator, followed by E2F4 and then by E2F5. Construction of chimeric proteins between E2F1 and E2F4 demonstrated that either the carboxy terminus or the amino terminus of E2F1 could make E2F4 a more potent activator. In contrast, neither the carboxy terminus nor the amino terminus of E2F1 could significantly increase the activity of E2F5. We found that, consistent with a role for E2F5 in transcriptional repression, E2F5's binding partner p130, like Rb, could also actively repress transcription when directly bound to a target promoter.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2003

A viral mechanism for remodeling chromatin structure in G0 cells.

Small DNA viruses force quiescent cells to reenter the cell cycle in order to replicate their DNA. We report here that the adenovirus E1A protein creates an S phase environment in quiescent cells by overcoming the nucleosomal repression of E2F-targeted genes. These genes are surrounded by Lys-9-methylated H3 histones, and their promoters are occupied by the pRb-related protein p130 and the inhibitory transcription factor E2F4. Kinetic analysis indicates that E1A binds to E2F promoters where it eliminates p130 and E2F4, resulting in the dramatic elimination of H3 Lys-9 methylation. Thereafter, H3 Lys-9 acetylation occurs along with the recruitment of activating E2F family members, and this is followed by the transcriptional activity of E2F-targeted genes. These results indicate that E1A has a role in reconfiguring chromatin structure and that this activity is necessary to overcome the repressive mechanisms that maintain cells in a quiescent state.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed1999

Transcriptional repression of the E2F-1 gene by interferon-alpha is mediated through induction of E2F-4/pRB and E2F-4/p130 complexes.

E2F is a heterodimeric transcription factor composed of one of five E2F subunits (E2F-1 to E2F-5) and a DP subunit. E2F regulates the expression of several growth-promoting genes, and thus, can be a target of antiproliferative action of interferons (IFNs). In this study, we investigated the mechanisms whereby IFN-alpha suppresses transcription of the E2F-1 gene. Transfection studies revealed that E2F-1 promoter was functionally divided into two parts: upstream activation sequences (UAS) and a downstream negative-regulatory element (E2F-binding sites). When cells were proliferating, transcription of the E2F-1 gene was primarily driven by the UAS, while E2F sites were not involved in activation. IFN-alpha markedly reduced E2F-1 promoter activity, but introduction of non-binding mutation at the E2F sites completely abrogated the inhibition. Free E2F4 was found to be the predominant species bound to the E2F sites in proliferating cells. IFN-alpha induced upregulation of E2F-4 along with dephosphorylation of pRB and p130, which resulted in the formation of E2F-4/pRB and E2F-4/p130 complexes on the E2F-1 promoter. These complexes function as transcriptional repressors to inhibit E2F-1 mRNA expression. Our findings indicate that E2F-4 is a critical regulator of E2F-1, which offer an excellent paradigm for understanding functional diversity within the E2F family.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed2002

An E2F-binding site mediates the activation of the proliferative isoform of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase.

In the present study, we demonstrate that E2F is implicated in the regulation of the glycolytic enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (6PF2K/Fru-2,6-BPase) during cell division. The expression of this enzyme is induced during the G(1)/S transition of the cell cycle. We identified and monitored the E2F-pocket protein complexes that bind to the E2F site of the F-type promoter during cell-cycle entry, and we analysed their contribution to the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase)-mediated regulation of the promoter. We found that the predominant E2F complex bound to the F-type promoter in unstimulated/quiescent cells contains E2F4, DP1 and p130 proteins. In serum-stimulated (S-phase) cells, the composition of the complex switched to E2F1/4, DP1 and p107, together with cyclin A and cyclin-dependent kinase 2. Treatment with the PI 3-kinase specific inhibitor LY 294002 prevented the formation of the S-phase complex, suggesting that activation of the PI 3-kinase pathway is essential for the formation of this complex. Further supporting this idea, we obtained results showing that treatment of cycling NIH 3T3 cells with either wortmannin or LY 294002 induces the accumulation of the transcriptionally repressive p130-E2F4-DP1 complex. Using the Rat-1 ER-E2F1 cell line where E2F1 activity can be conditionally induced, we demonstrated that E2F activity is involved in the in vivo transcriptional regulation of the F-type 6PF2K/Fru-2, 6-BPase gene. Taken together, our results show that the F-type 6PF2K/Fru-2, 6-BPase is a genuine E2F-regulated gene, and that its regulation by the PI 3-kinase pathway is at least partially mediated through the E2F transcription factor.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2004

Mapping DNA-protein interactions in large genomes by sequence tag analysis of genomic enrichment.

Identifying the chromosomal targets of transcription factors is important for reconstructing the transcriptional regulatory networks underlying global gene expression programs. We have developed an unbiased genomic method called sequence tag analysis of genomic enrichment (STAGE) to identify the direct binding targets of transcription factors in vivo. STAGE is based on high-throughput sequencing of concatemerized tags derived from target DNA enriched by chromatin immunoprecipitation. We first used STAGE in yeast to confirm that RNA polymerase III genes are the most prominent targets of the TATA-box binding protein. We optimized the STAGE protocol and developed analysis methods to allow the identification of transcription factor targets in human cells. We used STAGE to identify several previously unknown binding targets of human transcription factor E2F4 that we independently validated by promoter-specific PCR and microarray hybridization. STAGE provides a means of identifying the chromosomal targets of DNA-associated proteins in any sequenced genome.

Cells, Cultured↗
PubMed1999

Modulation of E2F complexes during G0 to S phase transition in human primary B-lymphocytes.

The pocket protein-E2F complexes are convergence points for cell cycle signaling. In the present report, we identified and monitored the pocket protein-E2F complexes in human primary B-lymphocytes after activation by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. Consistent with previous data from human and mouse fibroblasts and T-lymphocytes, E2F4 and DP1 form the predominant E2F heterodimers both in G0 and G1 phases of the human B-lymphocyte cell cycle, whereas E2F1 and -3 are first detected in late G1, and their expression levels increase towards S phase. Intriguingly, the major E2F complex that we detected in quiescent human B-lymphocytes is consisted of pRB, E2F4, and DP1. Though the levels of DP1 and -2 increase when cells progress from G0 to S, the proportion of DP1 to DP2 remains relatively constant during the cell cycle. We also observed an increase in electrophoretic mobility of the predominant E2F components, DP1 and E2F4, as B-lymphocytes progressed from G0 into early G1. This increase in mobility was attributable to dephosphorylation, as lambda phosphatase treatment could convert the slower migrating forms into the corresponding faster mobility forms. We further demonstrated that this change in phosphorylation status correlates with a decrease in DNA binding activity. This modulation of DNA binding activity mediated through the dephosphorylation of DP1 and E2F4 could help to explain the lack of in vivo DNA footprinting in late G1 and S phases of gene promoters negatively regulated through E2F sites and suggests a novel mechanism for controlling E2F transcriptional activity during the transition from quiescence to proliferation.

B-Lymphocytes↗
PubMed2000

E2F-Rb complexes assemble and inhibit cdc25A transcription in cervical carcinoma cells following repression of human papillomavirus oncogene expression.

Expression of the bovine papillomavirus E2 protein in cervical carcinoma cells represses expression of integrated human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 oncogenes, followed by repression of the cdc25A gene and other cellular genes required for cell cycle progression, resulting in dramatic growth arrest. To explore the mechanism of repression of cell cycle genes in cervical carcinoma cells following E6/E7 repression, we analyzed regulation of the cdc25A promoter, which contains two consensus E2F binding sites and a consensus E2 binding site. The wild-type E2 protein inhibited expression of a luciferase gene linked to the cdc25A promoter in HT-3 cervical carcinoma cells. Mutation of the distal E2F binding site in the cdc25A promoter abolished E2-induced repression, whereas mutation of the proximal E2F site or the E2 site had no effect. None of these mutations affected the activity of the promoter in the absence of E2 expression. Expression of the E2 protein also led to posttranscriptional increase in the level of E2F4, p105(Rb), and p130 and induced the formation of nuclear E2F4-p130 and E2F4-p105(Rb) complexes. This resulted in marked rearrangement of the protein complexes that formed at the distal E2F site in the cdc25A promoter, including the replacement of free E2F complexes with E2F4-p105(Rb) complexes. These experiments indicated that repression of E2F-responsive promoters following HPV E6/E7 repression was mediated by activation of the Rb tumor suppressor pathway and the assembly of repressing E2F4-Rb DNA binding complexes. Importantly, these experiments revealed that HPV-induced alterations in E2F transcription complexes that occur during cervical carcinogenesis are reversed by repression of HPV E6/E7 expression.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed1997

Position-dependent transcriptional regulation of the murine dihydrofolate reductase promoter by the E2F transactivation domain.

Activity of the dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) promoter increases at the G1-S-phase boundary of the cell cycle. Mutations that abolish protein binding to an E2F element in the dhfr promoter also abolish the G1-S-phase increase in dhfr transcription, indicating that transcriptional regulation is mediated by the E2F family of proteins. To investigate the mechanism by which E2F regulates dhfr transcription, we moved the E2F element upstream and downstream of its natural position in the promoter. We found that the E2F element confers growth regulation to the dhfr promoter only when it is proximal to the transcription start site. Using a heterologous E2F element, we showed that position-dependent regulation is a property that is promoter specific, not E2F element specific. We demonstrated that E2F-mediated growth regulation of dhfr transcription requires activation of the dhfr promoter in S phase and that the C-terminal activation domains of E2F1, E2F4, and E2F5, when fused to the Gal4 DNA binding domain, are sufficient to specify position-dependent activation. To further investigate the role of activation in dhfr regulation, we tested other transactivation domains for their ability to activate the dhfr promoter. We found that the N-terminal transactivation domain of VP16 cannot activate the dhfr promoter. We propose that, unlike other E2F-regulated promoters, robust transcription from the dhfr promoter requires an E2F transactivation domain close to the transcription start site.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2001

RBP1 recruits the mSIN3-histone deacetylase complex to the pocket of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor family proteins found in limited discrete regions of the nucleus at growth arrest.

Retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor family pocket proteins induce cell cycle arrest by repressing transcription of E2F-regulated genes through both histone deacetylase (HDAC)-dependent and -independent mechanisms. In this study we have identified a stable complex that accounts for the recruitment of both repression activities to the pocket. One component of this complex is RBP1, a known pocket-binding protein that exhibits both HDAC-dependent and -independent repression functions. RB family proteins were shown to associate via the pocket with previously identified mSIN3-SAP30-HDAC complexes containing exclusively class I HDACs. Such enzymes do not interact directly with RB family proteins but rather utilize RBP1 to target the pocket. This mechanism was shown to account for the majority of RB-associated HDAC activity. We also show that in quiescent normal human cells this entire RBP1-mSIN3-SAP30-HDAC complex colocalizes with both RB family members and E2F4 in a limited number of discrete regions of the nucleus that in other studies have been shown to represent the initial origins of DNA replication following growth stimulation. These results suggest that RB family members, at least in part, drive exit from the cell cycle by recruitment of this HDAC complex via RBP1 to repress transcription from E2F-dependent promoters and possibly to alter chromatin structure at DNA origins.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed2004

E2F-dependent histone acetylation and recruitment of the Tip60 acetyltransferase complex to chromatin in late G1.

E2F proteins can either activate or repress transcription. Following mitogenic stimulation, repressive E2F4-p130-histone deacetylase complexes dissociate from, while activating species (E2F1, -2, and -3) associate with, target promoters. Histones H3 and H4 simultaneously become hyperacetylated, but it remains unclear whether this is a prerequisite or a consequence of E2F binding. Here, we show that activating E2F species are required for hyperacetylation of target chromatin in human cells. Overexpression of a dominant-negative (DN) E2F1 mutant in serum-stimulated T98G cells blocked all E2F binding, H4 acetylation, and, albeit partially, H3 acetylation. Target gene activation and S-phase entry were also blocked by DN E2F1. Conversely, ectopic activation of E2F1 rapidly induced H3 and H4 acetylation, demonstrating a direct role for E2F in these events. E2F1 was previously shown to bind the histone acetyltransferases (HATs) p300/CBP and PCAF/GCN5. In our hands, ectopically expressed E2F1 also bound the unrelated HAT Tip60 and induced recruitment of five subunits of the Tip60 complex (Tip60, TRRAP, p400, Tip48, and Tip49) to target promoters in vivo. Moreover, E2F-dependent recruitment of Tip60 to chromatin occurred in late G(1) following serum stimulation. We speculate that the activities of multiple HAT complexes account for E2F-dependent acetylation, transcription, and S-phase entry.

Acetylation↗