SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Dose escalation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

243 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

De-escalation of radiotherapy in HPV-negative non-nasopharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Definitive and postoperative radiotherapy are central components of treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) but are associated with significant toxicities that can impair long-term function and quality of life. De-escalation strategies, aiming to reduce treatment-related morbidity while maintaining tumor control, have attracted increasing interest. However, most research has focused on HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. Systematic evidence for HPV-negative disease remains limited. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for prospective studies investigating radio(chemo)therapy de-escalation in HPV-negative, HPV-unspecified, or mixed non-nasopharyngeal HNSCC populations. CLINICALTRIALS: gov was searched for ongoing prospective trials. Data extraction and verification were performed independently by three investigators. RESULTS: Screening of 3156 records identified 14 published prospective studies, 10 in the definitive and four in the postoperative setting. Strategies included reduction or omission of elective nodal volumes, dose reduction, and combined approaches. Additionally, 23 ongoing prospective trials were identified. Across studies, elective nodal failure rates were consistently low (0-4.6%), with most recurrences occurring within high-dose volumes rather than de-escalated elective regions. Randomized evidence for elective nodal dose reduction is mixed: two trials maintained regional control and reduced acute toxicity, whereas another was stopped for futility. CONCLUSION: Available evidence on de-escalation in HPV-negative HNSCC is limited, derived primarily from small, heterogeneous phase II studies with mixed HPV populations. Although data are promising in selected settings, notably for elective nodal control, the randomized evidence for elective nodal dose reduction is conflicting, and further adequately designed prospective randomized trials are required.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Evidence Gap in Managing Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review of Radiation Boost Strategies.

PURPOSE: Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) involvement is a significant predictor of local recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). While lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) is routinely used in some countries to manage suspicious nodes, it is associated with increased morbidity and is not widely adopted in Western practice. Radiation boost (dose escalation) to involved LPLNs during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) has emerged as a potential non-surgical alternative. Despite increasing adoption of radiation boost to clinically involved LPLNs, there remains limited evidence defining its safety, oncologic benefit, and role relative to LPLND. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they reported outcomes of radiation dose escalation specifically targeting radiologically suspicious LPLNs in the context of nCRT. RESULTS: Ten retrospective cohort studies encompassing 482 radiation boosted patients were included. Boost doses ranged from 35.0 to 60.2 Gy. Rates of Grade 2-3 toxicity ranged from 28.0% to 39.3% across individual studies, with only one study reporting a single Grade 4 adverse event. Across individual studies, reported nodal response rates ranged from 62.3% to 100%. Comparative studies suggest that radiation boost may improve local control and reduce LPLN recurrence. CONCLUSION: Current retrospective evidence suggests that radiation dose escalation to involved LPLNs is a promising treatment strategy; however, the available data are limited by retrospective study designs and substantial clinical heterogeneity. Given the absence of prospective evidence and lack of consensus in current guidelines, an important evidence gap remains. Well-designed prospective trials are warranted to define the role of LPLN boost relative to LPLND.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

High-dose radiotherapy in patients with high-risk prostate cancers treated with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (GETUG AFU 18): a randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with high-risk prostate cancer, the role of dose-escalated radiotherapy in combination with long-term androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) is controversial, without any demonstrated benefit on cancer-specific or overall survival. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a 10 Gy dose increase, from 70 Gy to 80 Gy, on progression-free survival in men with high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with high-risk prostate cancer, defined as prostate-specific antigen of 20 ng/mL or more, Gleason score of at least 8, or clinical stage T3-T4, from 25 centres in France. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by minimisation, stratified by centre and previous pelvic lymph node dissection, to receive prostate-targeted dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (80 Gy; 2 Gy per fraction for 8 weeks) or standard-dose external beam radiotherapy (70 Gy; 2 Gy per fraction for 7 weeks), combined with long-term ADT. Neither the participants nor the investigators were masked to the allocated treatment. The primary endpoint was 5-year progression-free survival defined as the time from randomisation to first biochemical (defined as prostate-specific antigen >nadir plus 2 ng/mL) or clinical (ie, local, regional, or metastatic) disease progression, analysed in the intention-to-treat population, with 197 events required. 5-year progression-free survival was the prespecified endpoint, and 10-year progression-free survival was additionally reported (post hoc) in view of the low number of events at 5 years. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00967863, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between April 6, 2009, and Jan 24, 2013, 505 patients with high-risk prostate cancer were enrolled; 250 were assigned to receive dose-escalated radiotherapy (80 Gy) and 255 to receive standard dose radiotherapy (70 Gy). All participants were male and ethnicity data were not collected. At a median follow-up of 9·5 years (IQR 8·5-10·3), 5-year progression-free survival was 91·4% (95% CI 87·0-94·4) in the dose-escalation group versus 88·1% (83·2-91·6) in the control group, and 10-year progression-free survival was 83·6% (77·8-88·0) versus 72·2% (65·3-78·0; stratified HR 0·56, 95% CI 0·40-0·78, p<0·0001). Grade 3 or worse adverse events assessed at 6 months (acute toxicity) were observed in 60 (24%) of patients in the dose-escalation group and 62 (25%) in the control group. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were sexual disorders (28 [11%] in the dose-escalation group vs 20 [8%] in the control group) and bladder or urethra disorders (12 [5%] vs 19 [8%]). Adverse events assessed at 5 years (late toxicity) occurred in 118 (70%) of 168 in the dose-escalation group and 122 (73%) of 168 in the control group; grade 3 or worse late toxicities occurred in 19 (8%) participants in the dose-escalated radiotherapy group versus 17 (7%) participants in the control group. The most common late grade 3 adverse event was bladder or urethra disorders (seven [4%] vs three [2%], respectively). Serious adverse events occurred in nine (4%) patients in the dose escalation group and nine (4%) in the control group; none were considered to be treatment related. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: For patients with high-risk prostate cancer, radiotherapy at a total dose of 80 Gy, in combination with long-term ADT, improved progression-free survival and could be a potential option in this situation. However, given the low number of events, further research is needed to consolidate and confirm the benefit in dose-escalation in prostate cancer-specific survival and overall survival. FUNDING: French National Cancer Institute and AstraZeneca.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Reduced Length of ADT and ARTA With XRT in High-Risk Prostate Cancer (RELAX): A Randomised Controlled Trial.

AIM: To assess the efficacy of a short, intensified regimen of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) with curative-intent external beam radiotherapy (XRT) for high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) staged with prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RELAX (Reduced Length of ADT and ARTA with XRT in high-risk prostate cancer) trial is a multicentre, phase II randomised non-inferiority trial comparing 9 months of ADT and 6 months of ARTA against the standard 24-month ADT, with definitive dose-escalated hypofractionated pelvic radiotherapy for PSMA-staged non-metastatic HRPCa. The primary endpoint is 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), defined from randomisation to first biochemical or clinico-radiological recurrence or any-cause death. Secondary endpoints include biochemical failure-free survival, metastasis-free survival, overall survival, testosterone recovery, treatment-related adverse effects, and patient-reported outcomes. Participants are monitored with serial serum PSA and testosterone levels, CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE assessments, and PSMA-PETCT at recurrence. The non-inferiority margin is set at 10% absolute difference from an expected 5-year DFS of 85% in the standard arm, with intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is ethics board approved and funded by institutional intramural grant, and registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06818682). RESULTS: The planned accrual of 206 participants commenced in February 2025, with nearly a third of enrolment completed till date. CONCLUSION: The RELAX trial incorporates contemporary standards of PSMA-based staging, dose-escalated hypofractionated radiotherapy, and ARTA for HRPCa. The results are expected to inform the efficacy of a shorter, intensified androgen suppression strategy against the prevailing standard of long-term ADT for these patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Safety and Tolerability of Single and Multiple Daily Oral Doses of Dried Kratom Leaf Powder in a Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Kratom use is rising, increasing the need for safety and tolerability studies of high-quality and well-characterized kratom products in humans. Kratom's risk-benefit ratio, recommended dose, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), abuse potential, and withdrawal require evaluation. Thus, the safety and tolerability of 4 escalating single and 15 daily dried kratom leaf powder doses in human volunteers were evaluated over 47 days in the largest controlled kratom-administration study to date. METHODS: A randomized, between-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of MitraLeaf kratom powder after single doses (SD), during 15 daily doses (multiple doses; MD), and a 23-day follow-up was conducted in 116 volunteers (49 MitraLeaf and 67 placebo). Twelve participants each received a SD of either 6.65, 13.3, 26.6, or 53.2 mg (n = 13) mitragynine in 500, 1000, 2000, or 4000 mg of MitraLeaf, respectively, with a 10-day follow-up. The same participants received 15 daily doses at the same concentration of SD mitragynine received, with a 27-day follow-up period. Inclusion criteria were nonsmoking healthy males and females who never used kratom or had not used kratom for ≥12 months, 18-55 years old, and BMI ≥18.5 and ≤29.9 kg/m 2 . Participants were excluded if they had known CYP3A4, CYP2D6, or CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms. RESULTS: No serious adverse events or deaths were reported. TEAEs after SD or MD generally increased as the dose increased. Dizziness, nausea, and feeling of relaxation were the most commonly reported TEAEs after SD, and headache, feeling hot, increased alanine aminotransferase level, and nausea were most common after MD. CONCLUSIONS: This SD and first MD controlled study shows that Mitragyna speciosa -derived MitraLeaf kratom powder was safe and well tolerated at the dose ranges tested, with no evidence of meaningful abuse potential or withdrawal.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Response-adapted surgical de-escalation following neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable mucosal HNSCC A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Recent encouraging outcomes with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have generated interest in surgical de-escalation. However, the oncologic safety of response-adapted surgery (RAS) and its ability to achieve survival outcomes comparable to baseline-planned surgery (BPS) remain uncertain. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the Clinical Trials Registry for studies of neoadjuvant ICIs, with or without chemotherapy, in resectable mucosal HNSCC, that explicitly report surgical extent, between 2020-2025 was performed. Two independent reviewers extracted data following PRISMA guidelines. Main outcomes included major pathologic response (MPR), pathologic complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). Study-level proportions were pooled by random effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 statistic. RESULTS: The comparative analysis consisted of 4 RAS studies (involving 202 patients) and 11 BPS studies (403 patients). The pooled overall EFS was 83.3% (76.9-88.2) for the former and 82% (75.2-87.2) for the latter (P=.751), and the respective pooled OS was 92.3% (87.5-95.3) and 91.4% (80.3-96.5) (P=.839). The pooled pCR rate was 41.7% (95% CI 5.4-48.4; I2=.0) for RAS and 19.8% (95%CI 13.3-29.6; I2=.62) for BPS (P=.001), while the MPR was not significantly different (59.6%, versus 48.5%, P=.245). RAS was associated with greater organ preservation and reduced need for mandibulectomy and free-flap reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: RAS following neoadjuvant ICIs in mucosal HNSCC may enable surgical de-escalation with preserved oncologic outcomes and improved function in selected patients. Larger prospective studies are warranted.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Continuous Intravenous Lidocaine for Refractory Cancer Pain in Palliative Care: A Multicenter Feasibility Study.

ObjectivesTo assess the feasibility and tolerability of continuous low-dose intravenous lidocaine infusion in patients with opioid-refractory cancer pain receiving palliative care, and to explore its potential impact on pain outcomes in real-world clinical conditions.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled feasibility study in palliative care units to evaluate continuous intravenous lidocaine infusion in patients with opioid-refractory cancer pain. Patients were randomized to receive lidocaine (5 mg/kg/day, increased to 8 mg/kg/day if pain reduction was <30% after 24 h) or placebo for 48 h. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale, with a clinically meaningful response defined as a ≥30% reduction from baseline at 40 min. Secondary outcomes included pain evolution over time, neuropathic pain, symptom burden, and tolerability.ResultsThirty-five patients were included in the final analysis (18 lidocaine, 17 placebo). No significant difference was observed between lidocaine and placebo for the primary endpoint or for secondary pain outcomes. Reductions in pain intensity were observed in both groups. In the lidocaine group, 61% of patients required dose escalation to 8 mg/kg/day. Continuous intravenous lidocaine infusion was generally well tolerated, with mostly mild adverse events and no unexpected toxicity.ConclusionIn this multicenter feasibility study, continuous low-dose intravenous lidocaine did not demonstrate a clinically meaningful analgesic benefit over placebo. As the planned sample size was not reached, the study was underpowered. These findings highlight the challenges of randomized trials in palliative care and may inform future feasibility-oriented designs.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Workplace Safety Champions: Strengthening safety culture through nurse engagement.

Workplace violence is a growing concern in health care, disproportionately affecting frontline nurses and nursing assistants. Despite high prevalence, underreporting remains a barrier to effective prevention and response. This article describes the development, implementation, and outcomes of a Workplace Safety Champion program designed to increase reporting of violent incidents and strengthen a culture of safety. A multidisciplinary task force developed an evidence-based Workplace Safety Champion course that emphasizes de-escalation strategies, reporting processes, and staff support. Champions were appointed across inpatient and emergency units and integrated into a hospital-wide Workplace Safety Champion Council. Program evaluation used course completion data and posttraining surveys. The organizational goal of having at least one trained champion in 90% of inpatient and emergency units was exceeded, with 98% of units represented (N = 93 champions). More than 85% of learners reported intent to change their response to workplace violence, and 90% endorsed improved knowledge of resources and de-escalation strategies. The Workplace Safety Champion program successfully improved staff awareness, reporting, and engagement in workplace violence prevention. Embedding champions across units can serve as a sustainable strategy to strengthen safety culture and support frontline health care workers.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Validation of the newly introduced Deauville score 5a for patients treated for advanced-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma.

The Lugano Imaging Committee recently refined the Deauville score (DS), subdividing DS5 into DS5a (>2× liver uptake without new lesions) and DS5b (new lesions). We investigated whether this improves prognostic discrimination at interim positron emission tomography (PET) after 2 cycles (PET-2) in patients with advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (AS-cHL) treated in recent German Hodgkin Study Group randomized phase 3 trials. The primary analysis cohort was HD18 postamendment standard arms (uniform treatment with 6 cycles of escalated doses of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone [eBEACOPP]); sensitivity cohorts were HD18 intention-to-treat and HD21 eBEACOPP and brentuximab vedotin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, and dexamethasone arms. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed by landmark Cox models starting at PET-2. DS5a was infrequent (4%-6% across cohorts; 39/639, 67/1745, 33/568, and 29/560). In the primary cohort, DS5 was associated with inferior PFS vs DS1 to DS3 (hazard ratio [HR], 3.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-7.23) and vs DS1 to DS4 (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.01-5.50). Across sensitivity cohorts, DS5a remained adverse compared with DS1 to DS4 (HR range, 2.57-5.47), whereas DS4 according to the new definition did not consistently separate from DS1 to DS3, which is likely a result of PET-adapted treatment. Overall survival trends were concordant, but interpretation is limited by few events. To our knowledge, this is the first prognostic validation of the refined DS in prospectively randomized trial populations. The newly introduced DS5a isolates a small high-risk AS-cHL, which further supports risk assessment and adaptation using quantitative biomarkers from PET. The HD18 and HD21 trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00515554 and NCT02661503, respectively.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A Phase II Feasibility Study Combining Pembrolizumab and Metformin in Patients with Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer.

PURPOSE: Survival for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) remains low with <20% immunotherapy response. Metformin increases tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T and natural killer (NK) cells, which harbor PD-1. In this phase II clinical trial (NCT04414540), we combined metformin and pembrolizumab to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) in R/M HNSCC and assess NK-cell activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 into two arms: (i) metformin extended-release (ER) dose escalation to 2,000 mg over 14 days followed by combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks or (ii) pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks followed by combination with metformin ER 2,000 mg daily. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST 1.1. Nineteen evaluable patients were planned to estimate the proportion of approximately 32% ORR. Safety was evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. The distribution, activation, and cytotoxic function of NK cells were analyzed via flow cytometry. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled; 76% were male, 52% were smokers, and the median age was 64 years. Ten patients had oropharyngeal tumors, of which nine were p16+. Eighteen patients were evaluable for response, including four complete and five partial responses for an ORR of 50% [95% confidence interval (29-71)]. Combination therapy was well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events (AE). Five grade 3 AEs occurred: nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, and weight loss. Metformin led to increased peripheral NK-cell maturation and cytotoxic ability. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of metformin and pembrolizumab was well tolerated with mild gastrointestinal AEs and promising activity, warranting further investigation in a randomized trial.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of a Single-Pill Triple Combination of Valsartan, Amlodipine, and Chlorthalidone in Patients With Essential Hypertension Inadequately Controlled on Dual Therapy With Valsartan and Amlodipine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial.

Many hypertensive patients require three or more antihypertensive agents to achieve target blood pressure. This randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 trial conducted in South Korea evaluated the efficacy and safety of a single-pill triple combination therapy with valsartan (Val), amlodipine (Aml), and chlorthalidone (CTD) in patients whose blood pressure remained inadequately controlled on Val/Aml dual therapy. Patients uncontrolled after 4 weeks of Val/Aml 80/5 mg were randomized 1:1 to either Val/Aml/CTD 80/5/12.5 mg or Val/Aml 80/5 mg using a double-dummy design. After 2 weeks, doses were escalated to Val/Aml/CTD 160/5/25 mg or Val/Aml 160/5 mg, respectively, for a total treatment duration of 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to week 8. Of 193 randomized patients, 178 completed the study. The least squares mean ± SE change in MSSBP was -19.70 ± 1.31 mmHg in the Val/Aml/CTD group versus -8.71 ± 1.26 mmHg in the control group, yielding a statistically significant between-group difference of -10.99 ± 1.81 mmHg (95% CI, -14.56 to -7.41; p < 0.0001). No serious adverse events occurred in the Val/Aml/CTD group, compared with an incidence of 1.98% in the control group (p = 0.4985). Triple combination therapy with Val/Aml/CTD demonstrated superior blood pressure reduction and a favorable safety profile in patients with essential hypertension inadequately controlled on Val/Aml dual therapy, supporting its use as an effective treatment option in this population. Trial Registration: This trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT06416865).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Phentermine/Topiramate in Obese, Diabetic Uric Acid Stone Formers: An Open-Label Randomized Feasibility Trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether medical treatment of obesity, diabetes, and low urine pH with combination phentermine/topiramate affects uric acid (UA) kidney stone burden. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants with obesity, diabetes mellitus, normal renal function, urine pH < 5.8, and stone analysis ≥ 80% UA were block randomized (2:1 ratio) to phentermine 18.75 mg/topiramate 100 mg vs pragmatic controls for an 18-month, prospective, open-label feasibility study with dose escalation. The primary outcome was change in CT stone volume. Secondary outcomes included medication adherence; patient safety; and change in anthropometrics, laboratory studies, and body composition. RESULTS: Nineteen participants (age 62.1 ± 9.8 years; 68% male; mean BMI = 36.3 ± 2.9 kg/m2) were randomized, and 15 completed the study with 73% pill adherence and no serious adverse events. Stone volume by intention-to-treat analysis fell by 52% in the intervention group and rose by 8.6% in the control group (P = .10), with per-protocol analysis demonstrating statistically significant stone volume reduction (P = .02). At study end and compared with means of controls, the intervention group had greater weight loss (-10.2 vs +2.9 kg), reduction in hemoglobin A1c levels (-0.2 vs +0.5), lower 24-hour urine citrate (309 ± 81 vs 951 ± 782 mg), and lower UA supersaturation (0.7 ± 1.1 vs 1.8 ± 1.0), along with higher 24-hour urine pH (6.2 ± 0.5 vs 5.5 ± 0.4) and calcium phosphate supersaturation (0.9 ± 0.8 vs 0.2 ± 0.1; all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Among obese participants with diabetes mellitus and UA nephrolithiasis, phentermine/topiramate was well tolerated and demonstrated significant stone burden reductions by per-protocol analysis. The intervention group also had greater weight loss, higher urinary pH, and lower hemoglobin A1c and urinary citrate levels. These data provide a framework to study the impact of this novel alternative UA therapy on a wider range of patients with obesity and diabetes.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

The glucagon and GLP-1 receptor dual agonist DD01 for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and steatohepatitis (DD01-DN-02): 12-week results from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a major public health problem arising in the context of metabolic syndrome and obesity. DD01 is a liver-targeted GLP-1 receptor and glucagon dual agonist being investigated for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and MASH. The DD01-DN-02 trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DD01 in adults with MASLD or MASH; this initial analysis reports prespecified 12-week outcomes to assess early hepatic effects. METHODS: DD01-DN-02 is an ongoing, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial conducted at 12 outpatient clinical sites in the USA. Adults aged 18-70 years with obesity or who were overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) were included in the study. Patients with MASLD or MASH underwent liver biopsy and MRI-proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and were eligible if liver fat content was 10% or higher with metabolic risk factors, or if the biopsy confirmed MASH with a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score of at least 4. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous DD01 40 mg or matched placebo over 48 weeks, dose-escalated over 2 weeks, using a centrally administered interactive response technology system. The randomisation sequence was computer-generated by an independent statistician. Participants, investigators, study staff, outcome assessors, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants having at least a 30% relative reduction in liver fat by MRI-PDFF at week 12, which was analysed in all randomly assigned participants receiving at least one dose of study drug or placebo. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Missing primary endpoint data were handled using multiple imputation under a missing-at-random assumption. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06410924) and is ongoing but closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between June 13, 2024, and Jan 30, 2025, 67 eligible participants were enrolled, of whom 33 were randomly assigned to DD01 and 34 to placebo. The mean age of participants was 48·4 years (SD 10·6), 42 (63%) were female, 25 (37%) were male, 57 (85%) were White, and 52 (78%) participants had biopsy-confirmed MASH. At week 12, 25 (76%) of 33 participants receiving DD01 had a 30% or higher reduction in liver fat versus four (12%) of 34 participants receiving placebo (adjusted common odds ratio 28·8 [95% CI 7·2-115·2]; adjusted relative risk 6·3 [95% CI 2·5-15·9]; p<0·0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 28 (85%) of 33 participants receiving DD01 and 23 (68%) of 34 participants receiving placebo. The most common adverse events were nausea (18 [55%] of 33 participants assigned DD01; six [18%] of 34 participants assigned placebo), diarrhoea (nine [27%] of 33; six [18%] of 34), and vomiting (ten [30%] of 33; four [12%] of 34). Treatment-emergent adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in four (12%) of 33 participants in the DD01 group and one (3%) of 34 participants in the placebo group. Two (6%) treatment-emergent serious adverse events occurred in the DD01 group (abdominal pain and acute cholecystitis) and zero in the placebo group. No deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: In this prespecified 12-week primary analysis, DD01 produced rapid reductions in liver fat compared with placebo, supporting further evaluation in long-term studies. FUNDING: D&D Pharmatech, Neuraly.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Safety and efficacy of recombinant botulinum toxin type A (Eveotox®) in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity: Results from a Phase Ib/II clinical trial.

Upper limb spasticity is a common and disabling complication of stroke. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is widely used for focal spasticity treatment, but naturally derived products may present limitations related to immunogenicity and manufacturing variability. Recombinant botulinum toxin type A, produced by genetic engineering without complexing proteins, may provide improved product consistency. This Ib/II study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of recombinant botulinum toxin type A in adults with post-stroke upper limb spasticity. This multicenter, seamless Ib/II clinical study included an open-label dose-escalation Ib phase and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled II phase. Adult patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity received a single intramuscular injection of recombinant botulinum toxin type A or placebo. The primary endpoint in Phase II was the change from baseline in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of the primary target muscle group at Week 4. Secondary endpoints included MAS and Tardieu scale changes in individual muscle groups, Disability Assessment Scale (DAS), Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), and immunogenicity. The Ib phase showed improvements in MAS, DAS, and PGA, indicating an early efficacy signal. In Phase II, recombinant botulinum toxin type A produced a significant reduction in MAS score of the primary target muscle group at Week 4 compared with placebo, with effects sustained through Week 12. At Week 4, the PGA score in the Eveotox® group showed a statistically significant improvement compared with the placebo group. While MAS and PGA scores showed significant improvement, DAS functional scores did not differ statistically from the placebo group at week 4. The treatment was generally well tolerated, and low incidence of antibodies were observed. Recombinant botulinum toxin type A was safe and effective in reducing post-stroke upper limb spasticity after a single administration. These results support further Phase III clinical evaluation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

From population to individual: advocating personalised digital tools for heat-health early warning in a changing climate.

Escalating heat extremes under climate change are imposing substantial health burdens, with 2023 and 2024 consecutively breaking global temperature records. Mounting evidence suggests that heatwaves elevate the risks of hospitalisation and mortality across multiple disease categories, including ischaemic heart disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and acute kidney injury. Nonetheless, most existing heat-health warning systems remain primarily reliant on population-level predictions, and considering individual differences and disease-specific considerations when defining warning levels would benefit the effectiveness of early prevention for high-risk groups. In this Viewpoint, which is based on the framework of precision public health-delivering the right intervention to the right population at the right time-we propose a framework for personalised digital heat-health early warning tools comprising three dimensions: individualised, risk-stratified prediction models that generate tiered early warnings; personalised health prompts coupled with theory-informed behavioural interventions; and adaptive, equity-oriented alert delivery mechanisms tailored to diverse populations. Such tools have the potential to bridge precision disease prevention and climate adaptation, thereby helping to mitigate heat exposure risks and disease burdens, particularly among high-risk populations. Future implementation research will be essential to address substantial challenges related to feasibility, validation, and equity.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Immunogenicity of Two Versus Three Doses of Hepatitis B Vaccine When Administered to Children Aged 2-18 Months: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: A 2-dose hepatitis B vaccination schedule is highly immunogenic in children aged ≥1 year, but data for infants are scarce. Our goal was to compare the immunogenicity of 2- and 3-dose hepatitis B vaccination schedules in this population. METHODS: Children in the experimental group were recruited at 2 months of age and randomized to receive a homologous (Infanrix-hexa/Infanrix-hexa) or heterologous (Infanrix-hexa/Twinrix) 2-dose schedule at 2 and 12 months. Children in the control group were recruited at 18 months and had received a homologous 3-dose schedule (Infanrix-hexa/Infanrix-hexa/Infanrix-hexa) at 2, 4, and 18 months. All groups received a challenge dose (Twinrix) 3 years later. RESULTS: One month after the primary series, seroprotection rates (anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL) were high and similar among the 3 groups (heterologous 2-dose, 91.7%; homologous 2-dose, 90.9%; 3-dose, 94.2%). Geometric mean titers (GMTs) were lower in the 2-dose groups than in the 3-dose group. Post-challenge dose, the majority exhibited an anamnestic response, similar across all 3 groups (heterologous 2-dose, 97.2%; homologous 2-dose, 95.5%; 3-dose, 92.7%). GMTs were numerically higher in the heterologous 2-dose group (9380.5 mIU/mL) than in the 3-dose group (6900.6 mIU/mL) (P = .4). The proportion exhibiting local reactions was significantly lower after the heterologous 2-dose schedule than after the homologous 2-dose schedule. CONCLUSIONS: The anamnestic response 3 years after 2-dose (2 and 12 months) and 3-dose (2, 4, and 18 months) hepatitis B vaccination schedules was similar. The heterologous 2-dose schedule was more immunogenic and less reactogenic than the homologous 2-dose schedule.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Optimal dose and exercise modality to improve HbA1c in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses.

We aimed to compare exercise modalities and evaluate dose-response relationships with glycemic control including continuous aerobic exercise (CAE), resistance training (RT), combined exercise (CE), mind-body exercise (MBE), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Three databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of exercise interventions in older adults with T2DM reporting glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Pairwise, Bayesian network, and dose-response meta-analyses were conducted. Compared with control, HIIT demonstrated the largest estimated reduction (MD = -0.95%; 95% CrI -1.45, -0.49), followed by CE (MD = -0.59%; 95% CrI -0.93, -0.25), CAE (MD = -0.46%; 95% CrI -0.69, -0.24), MBE (MD = -0.42%; 95% CrI -0.76, -0.10), and RT (MD = -0.29%; 95% CrI -0.51, -0.08). Dose-response network meta-analyses suggested a non-linear association between overall exercise dose and HbA1c reduction, with maximal estimated benefits at approximately 704 METs-min/week with the 95% CrI excluding zero between 241 and 920 METs-min/week. HIIT demonstrated the steepest estimated dose-response relationship, but with wider credible intervals. Other exercise modalities showed more gradual dose-response patterns across their estimated effective ranges. Our findings suggest that exercise prescription for older adults with T2DM should be individualized according to exercise modality, dose, and health status.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 2.0 mg as an Add-On to Dose-Reduced Insulin Glargine versus Dose-Titrated Insulin Glargine in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Overweight (SUSTAIN OPTIMIZE).

AIMS: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) management with basal insulin can lead to hypoglycaemia and weight gain. SUSTAIN OPTIMIZE compared once-weekly semaglutide 2.0 mg as add-on to dose-reduced insulin glargine (Sema+IGlarreduced) versus dose-titrated IGlar (IGlartitrated) on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight (BW), daily insulin dose, and participant satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SUSTAIN OPTIMIZE was a 40-week, phase 3b, open-label, randomised study. Adults with T2D, overweight (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2), and treatment with basal insulin ≤ 40 units/day were randomised 1:1 into Sema+IGlarreduced or IGlartitrated. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c using a non-inferiority approach. Secondary endpoints assessed superiority of Sema+IGlarreduced versus IGlartitrated in reducing HbA1c, BW, daily insulin dose, and improving Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version (DTSQc) scores. RESULTS: Overall, 573 participants were randomised. Sema+IGlarreduced achieved both non-inferiority and superiority versus IGlartitrated in HbA1c reduction (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: -0.74%; 95% confidence interval [CI95]: -0.90, -0.59) and superiority in BW change (ETD: -8.5 kg; CI95: -9.5, -7.4), relative daily insulin dose change (ETD: -121.9%; CI95: -143.1, -100.6), and DTSQc scores (ETD: 2.6; CI95: 1.6, 3.5) (p < 0.0001 for all endpoints). No new safety concerns were identified. Severe hypoglycaemia was reduced (rate ratio: 0.45; CI95: 0.23, 0.87; p = 0.02), while gastrointestinal events were higher for Sema+IGlarreduced (310 vs. 32 events). CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.0 mg as add-on to dose-reduced IGlar achieved superior reductions in HbA1c, BW, and daily insulin dose in people with T2D and overweight, while reducing their risk for severe hypoglycaemia compared to dose-titrated IGlar alone.

Adult↗