Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Domperidone”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

On the pharmacokinetics of domperidone in animals and man. I. Plasma levels of domperidone in rats and dogs. Age related absorption and passage through the blood brain barrier in rats.

Domperidone, a novel gastrokinetic and antinauseant lacking central side-effects, was administered intravenously to male Wistar rats and orally to fasted rats of either sex and to 1- and 6-day old neonates at doses of 2.5 mg 14C-labelled drug/kg. The biphasic absorption of domperidone in fasted rats was extremely rapid suggesting a partial absorption from the stomach. The metabolism of domperidone was sex- and age-related: it was slower in the female rat and in the neonates. The elimination system for the metabolites was still immature in the 1-day old pups. The distribution of domperidone (and related metabolites) to the rat brain was limited, brain concentrations being lower than corresponding plasma levels in all cases. In 1-day old neonates, the blood-brain barrier was less obstructive to the passage of domperidone than in older rats. In Beagle dogs, domperidone pharmacokinetics were described by a two-compartment model with half-lives of distribution and elimination of 6 minutes and 2.45 hours respectively. The time-courses of the drug plasma levels were similar for single and repeated (once daily for 11 months) doses of 2.5, 10 and 40 mg/kg, indicating that chronic administration of domperidone, even at high dose levels, did not alter its pharmacokinetics. AUC-values increased proportionally with the dose pointing to linear pharmacokinetics over a wide dose range.

Age Factors

On the pharmacokinetics of domperidone in animals and man III. Comparative study on the excretion and metabolism of domperidone in rats, dogs and man.

The excretion and metabolism of the novel gastrokinetic and antinauseant drug domperidone were studied after oral administration of the 14C-labelled compound to rats, dogs and man, and after intravenous administration to rats and dogs. Excretion of the radioactivity was almost complete within four days. In the three species, the radioactivity was excreted for the greater part with the faeces. Biliary excretion of the radioactivity amounted to 65% of the dose 24 hours after intravenous administration in rats. Unchanged domperidone as determined by radioimmunoassay, accounted in urine for 0.3% in dogs, 0.4% in man, and in faeces for 9% in dogs and 7% in man. The main metabolic pathways of domperidone in the three species were the aromatic hydroxylation at the benzimidazolone moiety, resulting in hydroxy-domperidone -the main faecal metabolite-, and the oxidative N-dealkylation at the piperidine nitrogen, resulting in 2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1H-benzamidazole-1-propanoic acid the major radioactive urinary metabolite- and 5-chloro-4-piperidinyl-1,3-dihydro-benzimidazol-2-one. In urine the two first metabolites were present partly as conjugates. A mass balance for the major metabolites in urine, faeces, bile and plasma samples was made up after radio-HPLC (reverse-phase HPLC with on-line radioactivity detection) of various extracts. Only minor species differences were detected.

Adult

On the pharmacokinetics of domperidone in animals and man. IV. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous domperidone and its bioavailability in man following intramuscular, oral and rectal administration.

The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of domperidone, a novel gastrokinetic, were studied in healthy male subjects by comparing plasma concentrations and urinary excretion following intravenous, intramuscular, oral and rectal administration. Two oral dosage forms were studied: 10-mg tablets and a 10-mg/ml oral solution. The influence of a meal on the oral bioavailability and the dose-proportionality were also investigated. Plasma levels of intravenous domperidone could be described by a three-compartment model with a rapid distribution of 40% of the dose to a "shallow" peripheral compartment. The final elimination half-life was 7.5 hours. Peak plasma levels were reached within 30 minutes following intramuscular and oral administration and at 1-4 hours following rectal administration. Since domperidone showed an extensive first-pass elimination, AUC-values -a measure for the bioavailability- were considerably lower after oral than after parenteral administration. Equal oral and rectal doses gave a similar bioavailability. AUC-values increased proportionally with the dose over a 10-60 mg range. Cumulative urinary excretion of unchanged domperidone was proportional to corresponding AUC-values. The bioavailability was discussed in the light of the therapeutic results.

Administration, Oral

On the pharmacokinetics of domperidone in animals and man II. Tissue distribution, placental and milk transfer of domperidone in the Wistar rat.

Tissue distribution, placental transfer and transition into milk of the gastrokinetic drug domperidone were studied in the Wistar rat after i.v. or p.o. administration of the labelled compound at 2.5 mg/kg. Whole-body autoradiography and liquid scintillation counting were used to investigate the tissue localization of domperidone in pregnant and non-pregnant rats. In fasted rats, tissue levels were maximal within 15 minutes after either route. In non-fasted animals peak time occurred 30 minutes after oral treatment. Large amounts of radioactivity were present in the stomach, and in the bilious contents of the intestine. High activity was further detected in the liver, kidney, lung and some glandular tissues. After a rapid initial decrease radioactivity was eliminated with a half-life of 8-10 hours. Except for brain and testes, plasma levels were markedly lower than corresponding tissue levels. At 1 hour placental levels were 2-2.7 times higher and foetal concentrations 2.1-2.5 times lower than maternal plasma levels. The placentae and foetuses predominantly contained unchanged domperidone. At peak time only 0.2 (i.v.) and 0.08% (p.o.) of the dose crossed the placenta. Blood levels were always lower than milk concentrations. Preferentially metabolites were excreted with the milk. After a 20-hour suckling period of orally dosed dams, 0.2% of the dose was recovered in the combined tissues of 6 suckling pups.

Administration, Oral

Comparison of ranitidine, domperidone maleate and ranitidine + domperidone maleate in the short-term treatment of reflux oesophagitis.

In the treatment of reflux oesophagitis, either drugs preventing regurgitation of gastric juice in the lower oesophagus or pharmacological agents increasing the pH of the refluxing material are employed. In the present study 45 outpatients with reflux oesophagitis were randomly treated with either ranitidine (150 mg b.i.d.) or domperidone maleate (20 mg t.i.d.) or both drugs for six weeks. Before and after treatment the severity of dyspeptic symptoms and the grade of endoscopic and histological changes were assessed. The three therapeutic regimens were significantly and equally effective in inducing symptomatic relief and promoting endoscopic and histological disappearance or improvement of oesophagitis. The combined use of ranitidine and domperidone maleate failed to show any additional benefit compared with treatment with either drug alone.

Clinical Trials as Topic

Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting by domperidone: A double-blind randomized study using domperidone, metoclopramide and a placebo.

One hundred and ninety-five female patients of child-bearing age were assessed for postoperative vomiting in a double-blind trial using domperidone, metoclopramide and placebo. Compared with placebo, both drugs were found to reduce vomiting in approximately half the patients who had undergone caesarean section. However, in the group of non-obstetric patients, no statistically significant difference as regards vomiting was shown.

Adult

[Effects of domperidone on gastrointestinal and gallbladder motility and gastric emptying (author's transl)].

Effects of domperidone on gastric emptying and gastric, duodenal and gallbladder motility were investigated. Intravenous injection of domperidone 2 mg/kg produced an acceleration of gastric motility without increase in the tone while a marked increase in the amplitude of peristaltic waves with a slight decrease in frequency was observed. Domperidone also produced an acceleration of duodenal and gallbladder motility. Domperidone produced an acceleration of transit of stomach contents in some cases, while in others gastric emptying was inhibited. This difference of the effect may be due to the previous tone of the pylorus. The excitatory action of domperidone on gastrointestinal motility was suppressed to some degree after cervical vagotomy or vagus cooling and markedly inhibited by atropine. Tetrodotoxin reduced the excitatory effect of domperidone but did not abolish. Therefore, it is presumed that domperidone stimulates, at least in part, the gastrointestinal muscle itself as well as cholinergic neurons in the gastrointestinal wall or cholinergic receptors of the gastrointestinal muscle and that domperidone may also have a central nervous system stimulant action. On the other hand, domperidone appears to act directly on the gallbladder muscle.

Action Potentials

Effect of domperidone on the release of insulin after intravenous glucose load in man.

To determine whether the blockade of the dopaminergic system is capable of modifying glucose-induced insulin release in man, the responses of insulin to an iv glucose load were measured at various domperidone infusion rates. The infusion of 5 micrograms/kg/min of domperidone increased significantly plasma insulin levels during the acute phase of glucose-induced insulin release and lowered plasma glucose values at 50 and 60 min; the k of glucose disappearance improved significantly. At lower domperidone infusion rates the acute increment of insulin after glucose load was indistinguishable from the response observed at 5 micrograms/kg/min until 0.5 microgram/kg/min, while similar responses in control and experimental tests were observed at 0.25 microgram/kg/min. A group of subjects was submitted to an arginine load in order to establish whether the effect observed with domperidone was specific for the glucose-induced insulin release; but, this time, we did not observe any significant effect during the domperidone-induced dopaminergic blockade. Furthermore, we also measured the plasma prolactin levels, to see whether the specific and well known effect of domperidone on prolactin release matches with the effect on beta-cell function. As far as prolactin is concerned, we observed a dose response effect of domperidone infusion, with a detectable elevation of prolactin at infusion rate of 0.25 microgram/kg/min. Since domperidone is a specific antagonist of dopamine D2-receptors, we propose that dopamine might exert a specific inhibiting effect on glucose-induced insulin release through this class of dopamine receptors.

Adult

Selective depletion of dopamine in the goldfish pituitary caused by domperidone.

The effects of the dopamine type-2 receptor (D-2) antagonist domperidone on pituitary and brain amine concentrations and serum gonadotropin levels in the goldfish were investigated. Domperidone caused a long-lasting, dose-dependent depletion of dopamine in the goldfish pituitary. Pituitary concentrations of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT) were unaffected by domperidone treatment. Concentrations of noradenaline, dopamine, and 5HT in the hypothalamus and telencephalon were also unaffected by domperidone treatment. In contrast to the goldfish, dopamine levels in both mouse pituitary and hypothalamus were unaffected by domperidone treatment. The depletion of dopamine was observed in both sexually regressed and recrudescent, male and female fish, but elevation of serum gonadotropin levels in response to domperidone treatment occurred only in sexually recrudescent fish. Treatment of sexually recrudescent fish with the D-2 antagonists pimozide, (-)-sulpiride and eticlopride and the dopamine type-1 (D-1) antagonists SKF 83566 and SCH 23390 failed to elicit a depletion of pituitary dopamine or elevation of serum gonadotropin. Treatment of sexually recrudescent fish with domperidone, alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine or carbidopa elicited comparable depletions of pituitary dopamine and elevations of serum gonadotropin. The results suggest that in addition to D-2 receptor antagonist activity, domperidone has some other neuropharmacological action on dopaminergic neurones in the goldfish pituitary.

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-ben

[Prophylactic antiemetic treatment for cancer chemotherapy--comparison of domperidone and chlorpromazine].

The antiemetic effect of domperidone against nausea, vomiting, and anorexia induced by antineoplastic agents was compared with that of chlorpromazine. Twenty patients with malignant neoplasms given 2 cycles of a combination chemotherapy including cisplatinum and adriamycin received domperidone in one cycle and chlorpromazine in another cycle. Antiemetics 10-20 mg were given 30 minutes before chemotherapy and every 4-6 hours afterwards by div, iv, or po. No significant differences in severity of nausea and vomiting and duration of anorexia were noted between domperidone and chlorpromazine. Side effects were observed in 11 patients who received chlorpromazine, while none was observed in domperidone. It was concluded that domperidone was as effective as chlorpromazine as antiemetics and more useful because of its lower incidence of side effects. The antiemetic effect of domperidone, however, was not great enough for some patients, especially when they received cisplatinum. A higher dose of domperidone or domperidone with concomitant use of glucocorticoids should be considered as promising antiemetics for these patients.

Adult

Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of domperidone in healthy volunteers.

Domperidone is a potent gastrokinetic agent and antinauseant currently undergoing clinical trials in the United States. The bioequivalence of 20 mg of domperidone given as free-base tablets and maleate salt tablets, and the bioavailability of base and maleate tablets relative to a solution, were studied in 21 fasting men using a crossover design. Plasma samples collected for up to 48 hours were analyzed for domperidone levels, using a sensitive and specific radioimmunoassay (RIA). The absorption of domperidone was very rapid, with mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) values of 18.8, 15.0, and 20.7 ng/mL attained at 0.9, 1.2, and 0.6 hours after the administration of base tablet, maleate tablet, and solution, respectively. The mean elimination half-life (t1/2) ranged from 12.6 to 16.0 hours. The mean oral clearance (CL/F) after the solution dose was 4,735 +/- 2,017 mL/min and the mean apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) was 6,272 +/- 5,100 L, indicating an extensive distribution of domperidone in the body. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) data demonstrated bioequivalence of base and maleate tablets. The relative bioavailability for base tablet and maleate tablet was 107 +/- 50% and 116 +/- 47%, respectively, of that of the solution. Dose proportionality of domperidone was also studied in 12 subjects at solution doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg. Linear correlations between the dose and Cmax and AUC values were observed. Mean CL/F remained relatively constant after doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg (5,255 +/- 3,159, 4,842 +/- 1,774, and 4,380 +/- 1,289 mL/min, respectively), indicating linear pharmacokinetics of domperidone over the dose range studied.

Adult

Selective labelling of dopamine (D2) receptors in rat striatum by [3H]domperidone but not by [3H]spiperone.

Specific binding of [3H]spiperone and [3H]domperidone, displaceable by 1 microM d-butaclamol, was examined in rat striatal membranes. Initial saturation and displacement experiments indicated that [3H]spiperone bound to more sites than [3H]domperidone and that, whilst all displacing drugs were more potent against [3H]domperidone, this difference in potency was greatest for dopamine agonists and specific antagonists and least for 5HT-related drugs. Sulpiride displaced [3H]spiperone biphasically, and was used at a concentration of 50 microM to examine two classes of [3H]spiperone binding: site 1 displaceable by sulpiride, and site 2 displaceable by butaclamol but not by sulpiride. Site 1 had twice the capacity of site 2 and ten times the affinity for [3H]spiperone. Dopaminergic drugs displaced preferentially from site 1, whilst 5HT-related drugs were more potent against site 2. GTP reduced the potency of dopamine, noradrenaline and, to a lesser extent, 5HT at site 1, but had no effect at site 2. [3H]Domperidone sites had the same capacity as [3H]spiperone site 1, and dopamine, noradrenaline and 5HT, in the absence or presence of GTP, and sulpiride had essentially identical affinities for [3H]domperidone sites and [3H]spiperone site 1. It is concluded that [3H]domperidone and [3H]spiperone label an identical population of dopamine (D2) receptors, whilst [3H]spiperone also labels a substantial number of non-dopamine sites, at least some of which are 5HT-related. [3H]spiperone also labels a substantial number of non-dopamine sites, at least some of which are 5HT-related. [3H]Domperidone is the better radioligand for dopamine receptors.

Animals

A comparison of domperidone and haloperidol effects on different dopaminergic neurons in the rat brain.

Domperidone, a dopamine (DA) receptor antagonist with reportedly preferential actions outside of the blood-brain barrier, and haloperidol, a centrally active DA antagonist, were compared with respect to their abilities to increase the activity of dopaminergic neurons in the rat brain. The activity of nigrostriatal, mesolimbic, tuberohypophyseal and tuberoinfundibular dopamine nerves was estimated by measuring the in vivo rate of DA synthesis (dihydroxyphenylalanine accumulation following administration of an inhibitor of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) in the striatum, olfactory tubercle, posterior pituitary and median eminence, respectively. In an initial study, the rates of DA synthesis in striatum, olfactory tubercle, and posterior pituitary were determined at 2, 8, and 16 h after subcutaneous administration of 0.25, 2.5, or 25 mg/kg domperidone. At the lowest dose of domperidone, DA synthesis was increased only in the posterior pituitary at 8 and 16 h; at the intermediate dose, DA synthesis increased in the posterior pituitary at 8 and 16 h and in the olfactory tubercle at 8 h. Only at 8 h after the highest dose of domperidone was DA synthesis increased in the striatum. When 2.5 mg/kg of domperidone or haloperidol were administered, DA synthesis in posterior pituitary and median eminence was increased in a similar fashion (in the latter region only at 16 h). In contrast, domperidone promoted only modest and delayed increases in DA synthesis in the olfactory tubercle and had no effect in the striatum. These results indicate that systemically administered domperidone preferentially increases DA synthesis in neurons terminating outside the blood-brain barrier, but after a pronounced delay, high doses of the drug can also activate DA neurons which project to the forebrain.

Animals

Domperidone, a DA2-specific dopamine antagonist, has no effect on the renal or haemodynamic response to atrial natriuretic peptide in man.

1. Animal experiments have suggested that the renal effects of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) are dependent on dopaminergic activation, predominantly of the DA1-receptor. In man, there is evidence of dependence on the DA2-receptor for the natriuresis produced by central blood volume expansion. 2. Six normal volunteers underwent infusions of alpha-human ANP preceded by domperidone (a DA2-antagonist) or placebo. Eight volunteers underwent a 3 h period of 10 degrees head-down tilt also preceded by domperidone or placebo. 3. Both the ANP infusion and head-down tilt produced a significant diuresis and natriuresis, neither of which was antagonized by the presence of domperidone. 4. The ANP infusion significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure and produced significant increases in the Doppler-measured aortic blood velocity variables of peak velocity and maximal acceleration. Domperidone had an independent effect of increasing blood pressure but did not appear to have a specific interaction with the haemodynamic effects of ANP. 5. Head-down tilt reduced mean arterial pressure and heart rate and increased maximal acceleration. Again, an independent effect of domperidone was seen on blood pressure. Heart rate and maximal acceleration showed similar changes in the presence of domperidone. 6. Domperidone does not antagonize the renal or haemodynamic effects of ANP and if dopaminergic activation is necessary for the renal action of ANP it is unlikely to be mediated by the DA2-receptor.

Atrial Natriuretic Factor

TSH and PRL responses to domperidone and TRH in men with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus of different duration.

The effect of domperidone, a specific blocker of dopamine receptors, on serum TSH and PRL levels was evaluated in 16 euthyroid men affected by insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) of different duration and in 7 age-matched normal controls. Diabetics were divided into 2 groups of 8 men according to the duration of their disease (group I: 1-9 years; group II: 11-18 years). Both groups had normal basal levels of TSH and PRL. Responses of these hormones to domperidone were similar in normal controls and in group I diabetics, whereas they were significantly reduced in patients of group II. When all 16 diabetics were studied together, a significant negative correlation was found between mean maximal peaks of TSH and PRL responses to domperidone and duration of diabetes. In order to evaluate whether the reduced effect of domperidone in diabetics was due to alterations of the dopaminergic control of TSH and PRL secretion, the domperidone test was repeated in 6 normal controls and in 6 diabetics of group II after infusion of dopamine (4 micrograms/kg/min for 2 h). Dopamine infusion induced parallel decreases in TSH and PRL concentrations, without modifying hormonal secretory patterns in response to domperidone. These data suggested that the reduced TSH and PRL responses to domperidone in diabetics were not due to alterations of the dopaminergic control of pituitary function but to a defect at the pituitary level. To test this hypothesis, TSH and PRL responses to TRH were evaluated in group I and group II diabetics and in normal controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult

Neuropharmacological comparison between domperidone and metoclopramide.

Domperidone, a new gastrokinetic with potent antiemetic properties is devoid of central effects, up to high dose levels. To assess the CNS activity of domperidone and metoclopramide, the inhibition of intracranial self-stimulation (ICS) in two different situations, and the influence on EEG in dogs were studied. The dissociation between the antiemetic and central effects of both compounds were evaluated in dogs given a stereotypogenic dose of apomorphine. A significant and dose-related inhibition of ICS (conditioned situation) was obtained with 0.8 and 1.6 mg/kg i.v. domperidone and with 0.125, 0.25 and 0.50 mg/kg i.v. metoclopramide. The ED50 values were 0.79 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg respectively. The effect was most pronounced 4 hr after administration with domperidone and 15 min after administration with metoclopramide. In the EEG studies, no specific structure-related effects were found but the total potency was increased with domperidone 0.8 and 1.6 mg/kg i.v. and with metoclopramide 0.063, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.50 mg/kg i.v. This increase was due to a decrease in fast frequencies, an increase of slower frequencies and a slight increase of the amplitude. Sleep-like patterns were not observed with either compound. In the apomorphine-test in dogs, the ratio between the i.v. ED50 values for antagonism of stereotypy and of emesis was 180 (1.8/0.01) for domperidone and 2.67 (0.64/0.24) for metoclopramide. Thus, central effects and antiemetic effects are concomitant with metoclopramide, whereas with domperidone, extremely large doses are required to obtain central effects.

Animals

Domperidone. A review of its pharmacological activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the symptomatic treatment of chronic dyspepsia and as an antiemetic.

Domperidone is a dopamine antagonist that does not readily enter the central nervous system. Given parenterally or orally it increases gastric emptying of liquids and increases lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in healthy subjects. The antiemetic and pharmacodynamic profile of domperidone is similar to that of metoclopramide, although domperidone has a lower propensity to cause extrapyramidal side effects. Domperidone effectively alleviates symptoms of chronic postprandial dyspepsia and nausea and vomiting due to a wide variety of underlying causes and in some studies has been superior to metoclopramide. Vomiting associated with the administration of moderately emetic cytotoxic drugs is controlled in the majority of patients. Alleviation of the dose-limiting peripheral side effects (nausea and vomiting) of the anti-Parkinsonian drugs bromocriptine and levodopa, enables a higher optimum dose, with consequent improvement in Parkinsonian symptoms. Domperidone does not aggravate the extrapyramidal side effects of neuroleptic drugs. Control of cytotoxic-induced, and postprandial nausea and vomiting in children has been achieved with domperidone without evidence of extrapyramidal side effects. Indeed, side effects have seldom occurred with therapeutic doses of domperidone.

Antiemetics

[3H]domperidone binding to the kidney inner medullary collecting duct dopamine-2K (DA2K) receptor.

Previous studies by our laboratory have indicated that inner medullary collecting ducts (IMCDs) express a novel dopamine (DA) receptor, designated DA2K, that is linked to stimulation of prostaglandin E2 production. This receptor has a distinct pharmacological profile and is similar in size, but not homologous to, the brain D2 receptor. Because the DA2-selective antagonist domperidone blocks DA-mediated stimulation of prostaglandin E2 production in IMCD cells, we utilized [3H]domperidone to study the binding characteristics of the DA2K receptor in IMCD cells. [3H]Domperidone binding was saturable and best fit to a single high density site (KD, 57.6 +/- 10.5 nM; Bmax, 14.9 +/- 2.7 pmol/mg protein). The specificity of [3H]domperidone binding in IMCD cells was verified by competition analysis with a variety of dopaminergic and nondopaminergic agents. Dopaminergic drugs were less potent competitors for [3H]domperidone binding in IMCD cells than previously reported for brain DA receptors, but the rank order was consistent with the labeling of a DA receptor [antagonists: domperidone greater than spiperone greater than haloperidol greater than Sch 23390 much greater than (-)-sulpiride; agonists: norapomorphine greater than fenoldopam much greater than dopamine = quinpirole], and was better correlated with the pharmacological profile for the brain D2 receptor than the brain D3 receptor. In addition, quinpirole, the most D3-selective ligand currently available, did not compete for [3H]domperidone binding in IMCD cells. These results add further support to the existence of a novel high density DA receptor, DA2K, expressed in IMCD cells.

Animals