Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Discrimination Learning”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1991

Spatial learning, discrimination learning, paw preference and neocortical ectopias in two autoimmune strains of mice.

NZB and BXSB mice were given a battery of behavioral tests including paw preference, water escape, Lashley III maze, and discrimination learning. Their brains were then evaluated for cortical ectopias. The incidence of ectopias was 40.5% in NZBs and 48.5% in BXSBs. In the NZB strain left-pawed ectopic mice (both male and female) had the fastest swimming time in the water escape test, while right-pawed ectopics were the slowest. The same findings were obtained for left- and right-pawed ectopic BXSB males, but not for the females. However, on discrimination learning the BXSB males had the exact opposite pattern: right-pawed ectopics were the best learners while left-pawed ectopics were the worst. Male BXSBs and both male and female NZBs were manifesting autoimmune disease at the time of testing, while female BXSBs were not, suggesting that autoimmunity is a necessary background condition for the differential expression of ectopias and paw preference upon learning processes. The finding that the left-pawed ectopic BXSB mice, who were the poorest learners in the non-spatial discrimination learning test, learned best in the spatial water escape test is in agreement with the Geschwind hypothesis that pathological events during brain development may, in some instances, produce superiority of function.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Lesions in the central nucleus of the amygdala: discriminative avoidance learning, discriminative approach learning, and cingulothalamic training-induced neuronal activity.

The amygdala is critically involved in discriminative avoidance learning. Large lesions of the amygdala block discriminative avoidance learning and abolish cingulothalamic training-induced neuronal activity. These results indicated that amygdalar processing is critical for cingulothalamic plasticity. The larger lesions did not allow differentiation of the specific functioning of various amygdalar nuclei. Anatomical analysis showed that damage in the central (CE) nucleus of the amygdala was correlated with the severity of the behavioral deficit. The present study was carried out to determine whether smaller lesions, centered in the CE nucleus, would impair discriminative avoidance learning and block cingulothalamic plasticity. In addition, the possible role of the CE nucleus in appetitively motivated discriminative approach learning was examined for the first time. New Zealand White rabbits with CE nuclear lesions were first trained in the discriminative approach task. After attaining asymptotic performance, discriminative avoidance training sessions were alternated with continuing approach training sessions, one session each day. The rabbits with lesions were severely impaired in avoidance learning but showed no impairment of approach learning. Surprisingly, the attenuating effects of the lesions on cingulothalamic training-induced neuronal activity were more prevalent during approach learning than during avoidance learning. These results indicated that avoidance learning can be impaired by lesions centered in the CE nucleus that leave cingulothalamic plasticity largely intact and that the CE nucleus is involved in extra-cingulothalamic learning processes.

Amygdala↗
PubMed2004

Discriminative learning quadratic discriminant function for handwriting recognition.

In character string recognition integrating segmentation and classification, high classification accuracy and resistance to noncharacters are desired to the underlying classifier. In a previous evaluation study, the modified quadratic discriminant function (MQDF) proposed by Kimura et al. was shown to be superior in noncharacter resistance but inferior in classification accuracy to neural networks. This paper proposes a discriminative learning algorithm to optimize the parameters of MQDF with aim to improve the classification accuracy while preserving the superior noncharacter resistance. We refer to the resulting classifier as discriminative learning QDF (DLQDF). The parameters of DLQDF adhere to the structure of MQDF under the Gaussian density assumption and are optimized under the minimum classification error (MCE) criterion. The promise of DLQDF is justified in handwritten digit recognition and numeral string recognition, where the performance of DLQDF is comparable to or superior to that of neural classifiers. The results are also competitive to the best ones reported in the literature.

Discrimination Learning↗
PubMed1998

Reward-produced memories regulate memory-discrimination learning, extinction, and other forms of discrimination learning.

In memory-discrimination learning, reward-produced memories are differentially rewarded such that they are the only stimuli available to support discriminative responding. Memory-discrimination learning was used in this study as follows: Reward-produced memories that were assumed to regulate instrumental performance in previously reported extinction and discrimination learning investigations were isolated and explicitly differentially reinforced (prior to a shift to extinction) in each of 4 runway investigations with rats. Results obtained here in the explicit discrimination learning stage and in the subsequent extinction stage were consistent with the prediction of the memory view and with prior discrimination learning and extinction findings. The memory interpretation was applied to memory-discrimination learning, to extinction, and to 2 other types of discrimination learning. It appears that a theory must use reward-produced memories to explain all 4 types of discrimination learning.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Drug effects on sucessive discrimination learning in young chickens.

Chicks were trained to avoid pecking either a red or a blue bead in a one-trial avoidance task by coating one bead with methy anthranilate. They avoided the aversant bead on retention tests 10 to 180 min or 24 hr after learning, but not the neutral bead. Intracranial administration of ouabain or cycloheximide (CXM) 5 min before learning resulted in decay in retention after 10 and 30 min respectively following learning, discrimination being effective prior to those times. In a second experiment, chicks were trained on three physically distinct beads, two of which were made aversive during the learning period, the training trials separated by an hour. Saline-treated chickens retained memory of both aversive beads on retention trials 180 min later. CXM- and ouabain-treated chickens showed loss of memory for the bead associated with the drug but showed retention of the task which was not associated with the drug.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Postnatal high-peak blood ethanol concentration and external cue-based discrimination learning and reversal in the preweanling rat: comparison with memory-based discrimination learning.

Postnatal exposure to ethanol that produces high-peak blood ethanol concentrations (HP-BEC) in artificially reared infant rats affects hippocampal neuroanatomy and discrimination learning based on memorial cues from a patterned (single) alternation (PA) schedule in preweanling rats (P. L. Greene, J. L. Diaz-Granados, & A. Amsel, 1992). In the present experiments, discrimination by preweanling rats exposed to ethanol in the same way was tested with nonmemorial, external cues. In this external cue-based discrimination and in its reversal, ethanol-exposed rats were not different from normal or artificially reared controls whether the cues were presented in a PA or random manner, although there was some evidence that the memorial cues from the PA schedule contributed to learning a discrimination based on external cues, suggesting that the deficit reported earlier in ethanol-exposed rats is a memorial deficit and not a general discrimination deficit.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Restricted lesions to ventral prefrontal subareas block reversal learning but not visual discrimination learning in rats.

Previous studies have shown that extensive damage to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of rats causes reversal learning deficits. The mPFC of rats, however, consists of several subareas that are different from each other in both cytoarchitecture and neural connectivity, suggesting a functional dissociation among the mPFC subareas. In the present study, selective lesions of the mPFC of rats were made with a specially designed microknife whose intracranial placement could be controlled stereotaxically. Restricted lesions were made to each of the 3 parts of the mPFC: the anterior cingulate area (AC) (including the medial precentral area, PrCm), the prelimbic area (PL), and the infralimbic area (IL). One week after surgery, rats were trained in an aversively motivated visual discrimination task in a novel rotating T-maze. After reaching the acquisition criterion, rats were trained in a reversal task in the same maze. No difference was found in acquisition between control and mPFC lesioned rats. However, lesions of either the PL or the IL produced a marked deficit in the reversal task. This behavioral deficit was not found in rats with lesions of the AC. The results indicate that the mPFC of rats is not essential for discrimination learning, but that each of the 2 ventral subareas of the mPFC, PL, and IL, plays a critical role in reversal learning.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Picture recognition vs. picture discrimination learning in monkeys with medial temporal removals.

Three monkeys with complete ablations of temporal-lobe limbic structures and three unoperated controls were compared in an automated testing apparatus for their ability to remember pictures presented between 1 and 180 seconds previously, as well as to learn picture discriminations in which successive trials with a given pair were separated by either 20 seconds or 24 hours. The operated animals were not impaired in picture discrimination learning under either condition and they were not impaired in picture recognition memory up to about 10 seconds. At 10 seconds and beyond, however, the operated animals showed rapid deterioration of picture memory. The results demonstrate that the limbic system's selective contribution to learning and retention uncovered initially with objects applies equally to pictures, this contribution being essential for recognition memory but not for discrimination habits. The results demonstrate further that, as in humans, temporal-lobe limbic structures are essential for recognition only when the retention test exceeds the immediate memory span of a few seconds.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

Monkeys with combined amygdalo-hippocampal lesions succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hour intertrial intervals.

Monkeys with combined amygdalo-hippocampal removal show severe impairments on visual memory tasks after delays of only a minute or two, yet they learn visual discrimination habits about as quickly as normal animals with intertrial intervals of the same duration. In an attempt to resolve this discrepancy between abnormally rapid forgetting and successful retention, tests were conducted to determine whether discrimination learning would be prevented in animals with limbic lesions if intertrial intervals lasted 24 hr. The results showed that as long as the lesion did not encroach on inferior temporal cortex, the operated animals could acquire concurrent sets of 20 object discrimination habits at the same rate as normal animals, in an average of about 10 trials per set. The findings suggest that learning and retention processes are divisible into a mechanism for memory formation that is dependent on the limbic system and a mechanism for habit formation that is not.

Amygdala↗
PubMed1975

Inhibitory control and errorless discrimination learning.

Pigeons learned to discriminate between a positive stimulus (white key) and a negative stimulus (red or green key, depending on the subject) via Terrace's fading procedure. Generalization tests, conducted with intermittent reinforcement for key pecking at various wavelengths, yielded minima at the value of the negative stimulus in most "errorless" birds. Terrace's contrary finding of flat gradients in errorless subjects probably resulted from a floor-effect (i.e., virtually zero responding) produced by his extinction-test procedure. The present and other findings do not support Terrace's conclusions that the negative stimulus of an errorless discrimination is behaviorally neutral; inhibition apparently develops to the nonreinforced stimulus even during errorless discrimination learning. A negative correlation between stimulus and reinforcer seems the crucial factor in producing an inhibitory stimulus.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

Object discrimination learning and object-pattern discrimination transfer in visually deprived cats.

We used binocularly deprived cats (BD cats), control cats reared in the laboratory with open eyes (C cats) and normal wild cats (N cats). In stage 1, the cats were trained to discriminate a black ping-pong ball and a 3-dimensional cross of the same size and color for food reward. The BD cats learned slower than N cats. The difference between BD cats and C cats was statistically insignificant. A comparison of these data and previous data on discrimination of corresponding 2-dimensional black patterns (disk and cross) show that in discrimination learning the 3-dimensionality of stimuli is helpful for N cats, but not for BD cats. Thus, the objects and their patterns are for BD cats highly similar. In stage 2, the objects were replaced by corresponding 2-dimensional patterns (disk and cross). Pattern discrimination was learned slower by BD cats than by N cats. Thus, the objects and their patterns are for BD cats certainly not identical and BD cats are deficient in discrimination transfer of even highly similar pairs of visual stimuli.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Impaired dimensional selection but intact use of reward feedback during visual discrimination learning in Parkinson's disease.

It has been suggested that Parkinson's disease (PD) impairs the ability to learn on the basis of reward or reinforcing feedback i.e., by trial-and-error. In many learning tasks, particular 'dimensions' of stimulus information are relevant whilst others are irrelevant; therefore, efficient performance depends on identifying the dimensions of these 'compound' stimuli and selecting the relevant dimension for further processing. We investigated the ability of patients with PD, as well as patients with Huntington's disease and patients with frontal or temporal lobe lesions, to learn visual discriminations which required either a number of associations to be learned concurrently (the 'eight-pair' task) or the selection of information from compound stimuli (the 'five-dimension' task), both tasks being learned by trial-and-error. None of the basal ganglia disorder patient groups was impaired on the eight-pair task, militating against a crucial role for these brain structures in trial-and-error learning per se. Patients with mild, medicated PD, but not unmedicated PD patients, were impaired at identifying all five feature dimensions in the five-dimension task, implying dopaminergic 'overdosing' of the ability to analyse compound stimuli in terms of their component dimensions. Temporal lobe lesion patients performed similarly, suggesting that the temporal lobe may be the site of the medication overdose effect. Patients with severe, medicated PD were impaired at compound discrimination learning on the five-dimension task in the absence of an underlying impairment in identifying component stimulus dimensions; this pattern resembled that seen in Huntington's disease and frontal lobe lesion patients, implying that fronto-striatal circuitry is involved in the formation of rules based upon selected stimulus dimensions.

Adult↗