Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Directive Counseling”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

A review of the literature on debriefing or non-directive counselling to prevent postpartum emotional distress.

BACKGROUND: childbirth generates powerful emotions and may lead to the development of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and trauma in some women. Debriefing and non-directive counselling have been used as early interventions to reduce the prevalence of depression and post-traumatic stress. METHODS: a review of the literature was conducted to describe the current state of knowledge on the effectiveness of a single debriefing session or non-directive counselling session to reduce depression and trauma symptoms in women following birth. FINDINGS: a total of three studies reported in four papers examined the use of debriefing or non-directive counselling to prevent or reduce psychological morbidity following birth. The two largest RCTs indicate that a single debriefing session with the woman whilst in the postnatal ward is of no statistically significant value in reducing psychological morbidity and may even be harmful. In contrast, women reported that an opportunity to talk with someone about the birth was helpful in facilitating recovery. CONCLUSION: there is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of debriefing following childbirth, primarily because it is unclear if a standardised debriefing intervention was used. Future research should clearly describe the intervention and test alternative interventions; measure a broader range of outcomes including trauma symptoms; use inclusion criteria that acknowledge the complex contributing factors to depression and trauma; and examine the value of including the woman's partner (or significant other) in the debriefing or counselling session(s). Future studies should investigate the timing or place of the intervention, the provision of more than one opportunity to discuss the birth, and target the intervention to women who are more likely to develop trauma symptoms or post-traumatic stress disorder.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1989

The role of beneficence in clinical genetics: non-directive counseling reconsidered.

The popular view of non-directive genetic counseling limits the counselor's role to providing information to clients and assisting families in making decisions in a morally neutral fashion. This view of non-directive genetic counseling is shown to be incomplete. A fuller understanding of what it means to respect autonomy shows that merely respecting client choices does not exhaust the duty. Moreover, the genetic counselor/client relationship should also be governed by the counselor's commitment to the principle of beneficence. When non-directive counseling is reexamined in light of both these principles, it becomes clear that there are cases in which counselors should attempt to persuade clients to reconsider their decisions. Such attempts are consistent with non-directive counseling because, while respecting the clients' decision-making authority, they insure that clients act with full knowledge of the moral consequences of their decisions.

Beneficence↗
PubMed2000

Randomised controlled trial of non-directive counselling, cognitive-behaviour therapy and usual general practitioner care in the management of depression as well as mixed anxiety and depression in primary care.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine both the clinical and cost-effectiveness of usual general practitioner (GP) care compared with two types of brief psychological therapy (non-directive counselling and cognitive-behaviour therapy) in the management of depression as well as mixed anxiety and depression in the primary care setting. DESIGN: The design was principally a pragmatic randomised controlled trial, but was accompanied by two additional allocation methods allowing patient preference: the option of a specific choice of treatment (preference allocation) and the option to be randomised between the psychological therapies only. Of the 464 patients allocated to the three treatments, 197 were randomised between the three treatments, 137 chose a specific treatment, and 130 were randomised between the psychological therapies only. The patients underwent follow-up assessments at 4 and 12 months. SETTING: The study was conducted in 24 general practices in Greater Manchester and London. SUBJECTS: A total of 464 eligible patients, aged 18 years and over, were referred by 73 GPs and allocated to one of the psychological therapies or usual GP care for depressive symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: The interventions consisted of brief psychological therapy (12 sessions maximum) or usual GP care. Non-directive counselling was provided by counsellors who were qualified for accreditation by the British Association for Counselling. Cognitive-behaviour therapy was provided by clinical psychologists who were qualified for accreditation by the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies. Usual GP care included discussions with patients and the prescription of medication, but GPs were asked to refrain from referring patients for psychological intervention for at least 4 months. Most therapy sessions took place on a weekly basis in the general practices. By the 12-month follow-up, GP care in some cases did include referral to mental healthcare specialists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The clinical outcomes included depressive symptoms, general psychiatric symptoms, social function and patient satisfaction. The economic outcomes included direct and indirect costs and quality of life. Assessments were carried out at baseline during face-to-face interviews as well as at 4 and 12 months in person or by post. RESULTS: At 4 months, both psychological therapies had reduced depressive symptoms to a significantly greater extent than usual GP care. Patients in the psychological therapy groups exhibited mean scores on the Beck Depression Inventory that were 4-5 points lower than the mean score of patients in the usual GP care group, a difference that was also clinically significant. These differences did not generalize to other measures of outcome. There was no significant difference in outcome between the two psychological therapies when they were compared directly using all 260 patients randomised to a psychological therapy by either randomised allocation method. At 12 months, the patients in all three groups had improved to the same extent. The lack of a significant difference between the treatment groups at this point resulted from greater improvement of the patients in the GP care group between the 4- and 12-month follow-ups. At 4 months, patients in both psychological therapy groups were more satisfied with their treatment than those in the usual GP care group. However, by 12 months, patients who had received non-directive counselling were more satisfied than those in either of the other two groups. There were few differences in the baseline characteristics of patients who were randomised or expressed a treatment preference, and no differences in outcome between these patients. Similar outcomes were found for patients who chose either psychological therapy. Again, there were no significant differences between the two groups at 4 or 12 months. Patients who chose counselling were more satisfied with treatment than those who chose c

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Randomised controlled trial of non-directive counselling, cognitive-behaviour therapy, and usual general practitioner care for patients with depression. I: clinical effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of general practitioner care and two general practice based psychological therapies for depressed patients. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled trial with randomised and patient preference allocation arms. SETTING: General practices in London and greater Manchester. PARTICIPANTS: 464 of 627 patients presenting with depression or mixed anxiety and depression were suitable for inclusion. INTERVENTIONS: Usual general practitioner care or up to 12 sessions of non-directive counselling or cognitive-behaviour therapy provided by therapists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Beck depression inventory scores, other psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, and satisfaction with treatment measured at baseline and at 4 and 12 months. RESULTS: 197 patients were randomly assigned to treatment, 137 chose their treatment, and 130 were randomised only between the two psychological therapies. All groups improved significantly over time. At four months, patients randomised to non-directive counselling or cognitive-behaviour therapy improved more in terms of the Beck depression inventory (mean (SD) scores 12.9 (9.3) and 14.3 (10.8) respectively) than those randomised to usual general practitioner care (18.3 (12.4)). However, there was no significant difference between the two therapies. There were no significant differences between the three treatment groups at 12 months (Beck depression scores 11.8 (9.6), 11.4 (10.8), and 12.1 (10.3) for non-directive counselling, cognitive-behaviour therapy, and general practitioner care). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological therapy was a more effective treatment for depression than usual general practitioner care in the short term, but after one year there was no difference in outcome.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

[Some aspects of pharmacotherapy of tinnitus. Compound therapy with Xylocaine and directive counseling--long-term results].

29 out of 49 patients, who were treated in 1996-1998 with Xylocaine and directive counselling for their tinitus, were reevaluated. Non of the patients used any other pharmacological treatment of the tinnitus or underwent full tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) since 10-days treatment with Xylocaine had been completed. Initially 65.3% of patients declared improvement in their tinnitus. After over 5 years of observation success rate decreased to only 41.3%. Since the positive effect of 10-days treatment with Xylocaine and directive counselling was not stable we concluded that tinnitus patients should receive full TRT.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2000

Randomised controlled trial of non-directive counselling, cognitive-behaviour therapy, and usual general practitioner care for patients with depression. II: cost effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost effectiveness of general practitioner care and two general practice based psychological therapies for depressed patients. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled trial with randomised and patient preference allocation arms. SETTING: General practices in London and greater Manchester. PARTICIPANTS: 464 of 627 patients presenting with depression or mixed anxiety and depression were suitable for inclusion. INTERVENTIONS: Usual general practitioner care or up to 12 sessions of non-directive counselling or cognitive-behaviour therapy provided by therapists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Beck depression inventory scores, EuroQol measure of health related quality of life, direct treatment and non-treatment costs, and cost of lost production. RESULTS: 197 patients were randomly assigned to treatment, 137 chose their treatment, and 130 were randomised only between the two psychological therapies. At four months, both non-directive counselling and cognitive-behaviour therapy reduced depressive symptoms to a significantly greater extent than usual general practitioner care. There was no significant difference in outcome between treatments at 12 months. There were no significant differences in direct costs, production losses, or societal costs between the three treatments at either four or 12 months. Sensitivity analyses did not suggest that the results depended on particular assumptions in the statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Within the constraints of available power, the data suggest that both brief psychological therapies may be significantly more cost effective than usual care in the short term, as benefit was gained with no significant difference in cost. There are no significant differences between treatments in either outcomes or costs at 12 months.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Framing, truth telling and the problem with non-directive counselling.

In this paper several reasons as to why framing issues should be of greater interest to both medical ethicists and healthcare professionals are suggested: firstly, framing can help in explaining health behaviours that can, from the medical perspective, appear perverse; secondly, framing provides a way of describing the internal structure of ethical arguments; and thirdly, an understanding of framing issues can help in identifying clinical practices, such as non-directive counselling, which may, inadvertently, be failing to meet their own stated ethical aims. The effect of framing on how individuals interpret information and how healthcare choices are influenced by framing are described. Next, the role of framing in ethical discourse is discussed with specific reference to Judith Jarvis Thomson's philosophical mind experiment about abortion and the violinist. Finally, the implications of this analysis are examined for the practice of non-directive counselling, which aims at communicating information in a neutral, value-free way and thereby protecting patient autonomy.

Communication↗
PubMed1996

Directive counseling on long-acting contraception.

National rates of unintended births are a major public health concern. The availability of highly effective long-acting contraceptives has prompted some public officials to promote the coercive use of these methods to reduce such problems as intergenerational poverty and child abuse. Broad-brush public policies that require long-term contraceptive use are unethical. However, persuasion to use these methods can be appropriate. One place for exerting ethically justified influence is in family planning counseling. The dominant nondirective counseling model, which excludes the possibility of vigorous persuasion, is overly rigid. Family planning professionals should develop practice protocols that permit and guide the exercise of directive counseling to use long-acting contraception.

Child↗
PubMed1998

A critical analysis of directive counselling as a component of tinnitus retraining therapy.

Tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) has been presented as a new approach to tinnitus management. In this paper a number of theoretical and practical problems with TRT are identified. These problems relate to the distinction between directive counselling and cognitive therapy, the adequacy of the cognitive therapy components, the nature of the outcome data which have been presented to date, the theoretical basis for the treatment, and the conceptual clarity of terms such as perception, attention and coping. The stated goal of removal of the perception of tinnitus may lead to confusion about the likely outcome of TRT for most patients. Methodological limitations in the research which has been published to date preclude any claims about the efficacy of TRT at the present time. It is suggested that randomized, controlled studies which include no-treatment and placebo conditions need to be undertaken. Studies are required in which the efficacy of the counselling and white noise components can be clearly isolated. Suggestions are made about the role of psychologists and non-psychologists in the provision of counselling and cognitive therapy services to tinnitus patients.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed2000

Should genetic health care providers attempt to influence reproductive outcome using directive counseling techniques? A public health prospective.

Many areas of agreement exist among genetic health care (GHC) professionals (i.e., MD and PhD clinical geneticists, master's level genetic counselors, and others) and public health (PH) professionals. However, there are in our opinion at least two areas or tenets where a distinct difference of opinion exists. Two tenets widely expressed by prenatal GHC professionals are: (1) they should never attempt to influence the outcome of a pregnancy, and (2) they should only use non-directive genetic counseling techniques. From a PH perspective, these tenets could be viewed in some instances as counterproductive and contrary to a major goal of PH (i.e., to improve the health and well-being of all residents, including newborns). For example, PH's message regarding fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) prevention is clear: If you are pregnant, don't drink; and if you drink, don't get pregnant. PH's message regarding neural tube defect (NTD) prevention is equally clear: all women of childbearing age who are capable of becoming pregnant should consume 0.4 mg of folic acid daily to reduce the risk of NTDs. In the past, issues such as eugenics, abortion of affected fetuses, and a lack of methods for the primary prevention of birth defects and genetic disorders have caused GHC providers to perform genetic counseling according to the two tenets mentioned above. Clearly, there are no moral or ethical reasons why children who are at risk for FAS, NTDs, fetal rubella syndrome, or many other conditions should not have the opportunity to be born healthy. Also, we know of no laws that prohibit providers from telling a woman to do something to improve her baby's chance of being born healthy. In our opinion, it is time for prenatal GHC professionals to re-examine the two tenets noted above on a case-by-case basis to determine when it is appropriate to use directive counseling techniques to improve reproductive outcomes in accordance with the goals of PH. A framework is provided here that could serve as: (1) a guide for future discussions dealing with these issues, and (2) a method to ensure that prenatal GHC policy and practice regarding these issues conform with one another.

Ethics, Medical↗
PubMed1992

Advance care directives: counseling the patient and family in the primary care setting.

NPs are in an excellent position to provide primary care patients with the appropriate counseling for the development of required advanced care directives before the onset of serious illness and hospitalization. Discussion of how and whom to counsel assists the NP in undertaking this important responsibility encountered by primary care providers.

Advance Directives↗