Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Digestive System Surgical Procedures”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The economic impact of incorporating flexible endoscopy into a community general surgery practice.

BACKGROUND: Flexible endoscopy is a vital component of gastrointestinal surgery. It has and will replace many of the surgical procedures now commonly performed. Flexible endoscopy, unfortunately, is not an integral part of surgical residency training based on resident operative experience as reported by the Residency Review Committee. Moreover, general surgeons have deferred the practice of flexible endoscopy to the gastroenterologists because of concerns over turf battles and referral patterns. The purpose of this study was to assess the overall case load and the economic impact of flexible endoscopy on the practice of general surgery in a community hospital setting. METHODS: This retrospective review was performed over a 6-month period. The total cases and the total billings of inpatient and outpatient procedures for a group practice of five general surgeons in a community hospital were evaluated. The billings were the actual charges based on current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for these procedures using the Medicare fee schedule. RESULTS: Of the 2,159 procedures performed, 1,154 involved flexible endoscopy cases accounting for 54% of all cases (1,154 of 2,159) performed from February 1, 2003 to July 31, 2003. Flexible endocopy accounted for 43% of the total charges. A. total of 46 surgical procedures and 216 future endoscopies were generated from the flexible endoscopic procedures. Future endoscopic cases were for surveillance of colonic neoplasia and Barrett's esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible endoscopy contributed to a major portion of the caseload and revenue generated by the general surgery group studied. The overall impact of flexible endoscopy is even greater than reported because of the future endoscopic surveillance cases or surgical interventions generated on the basis of endoscopic findings.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

The ZEUS robotic system: experimental and clinical applications.

Laparoscopic procedures provide shorter hospitalization, less pain, better cosmetic results, and faster returns to normal than traditional surgery. Surgeons performing them, however, are hampered by lack of tridimensional view and haptic sense, and by remoteness; but this physical gap also allows robotic and computer interfaces. The computer digitizes surgical movements and images and modifies this information to filter out nonfinalized movements such as tremor, increasing dexterity and precision. Digitized information can also be transmitted to remote locations, allowing surgical care in remote or underserved areas, and enhancing surgical education. There are several robotic surgical systems available; this article reviews the experimental and clinical use of the ZEUS robotic system and discusses its possible role in the future operating room.

Animals↗

Antibacterial prophylaxis in surgery: 1--Gastrointestinal and biliary surgery.

Two years ago, we reviewed systemic antibacterial prophylaxis for preventing infection after orthopaedic surgery. In this article, the first in a new series, we review the general principles governing antibacterial prophylaxis for preventing surgical-site infection (i.e. involving the wound, organs or spaces), and discuss prophylaxis for surgery on the gut and biliary system. Future articles will consider prophylaxis for obstetric, gynaecological and urogenital operations, and vascular surgery.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

[Endoscopic surgery of the digestive system: state of the art. Opinion of an endoscopic surgeon].

The Authors review the possible applications of surgical endoscopy in oesophageal, gastric, biliary, pancreatic and colic diseases. This critical assessment, performed under the abdominal endoscopic surgeon's point of view, is based on the overall experience of about 20 years of surgery, with particular regard to the sclerosis of oesophageal varices, neoplastic obstructions of oesophagus, biliary tract, colon and localized Laser treatment of neoplasms. Based on the results achieved, thanks to selective indications and monitoring by conventional surgical experience, the Authors conclude by staging a better reliability of the surgeon who performs surgical endoscopy to obtain good results after an accurate selection of those cases which can really benefit from endoscopic management.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Rehabilitation problems of head and neck cancer patients.

Head and neck cancer and its treatment result in varying degrees of disability affecting various organ systems. Ideal treatment of such patients requires a unit capable of managing problems in the areas of: Reconstructive surgery, maxillofacial prosthodontia, dentistry, deglutition disorders, and psychological, social, and vocational rehabilitation. Provision of such facilities in an integrated manner will give the patient the optimal chance for rehabilitation from the complex disabilities occurring in head and neck cancer.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

[Outpatient operations and inpatient care changes according to section sign 115 b SGB V].

The German self-governing bodies have concluded an agreement about ambulant operations and procedures which replaces the inpatient health care situation. It came into force on January 1, 2004. The published catalogue contains specific treatment procedures which define more clearly some problems that occur between the provision of outpatient and inpatient services in the German health care system. Clinical physicians and practising specialists now have equal rights to provide and to charge for the ambulant services that are included in this agreement. These conditions will play a role in the daily routine of hospitals and will influence treatment patterns. A comprehensive knowledge of the basic principles is essential. In the present article, the compulsory agreement and some resulting consequences are elucidated with special relevance to gastroenterology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

Risks of synchronous gastrointestinal or biliary surgery with splenectomy for hematologic disease.

BACKGROUND: The addition of splenectomy to a gastrointestinal (GI) operation may have an adverse effect on mortality, morbidity, and even survival. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risks of the converse: synchronous GI surgery appended to splenectomy for hematologic diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Multiple hospitals comprising an affiliated surgical training program. PATIENTS: Consecutive sample of 207 adults (mean age, 49 years) with splenectomies for hematologic diseases. INTERVENTION: Splenectomy and concomitant GI or biliary surgery (group 1, n=19) and splenectomy alone (group 2, n=188). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of hospital or intensive care unit stay, later operations, postoperative infections, postoperative abdominal abscess, major complications, and death. RESULTS: Preoperative and intraoperative factors were similar in both groups. Operative mortality was 3 of 19 in group 1 and 8 of 188 in group 2 (p=.07). The mean number of major complications tended to be higher in group 1 (1.5 vs 0.5, P=07). Despite no difference between the incidences of overall postoperative infections, patients in group 1 were much more likely to develop an abdominal abscess (4 of 19 vs 3 of 188, P=.002). Logistic regression established that patients undergoing splenectomy and synchronous GI or biliary surgery were 25 times more likely to develop an intra-abdominal abscess than were patients with splenectomy alone, even controlling for confounding factors (odds ratio, 24.7; 95% confidence interval, 3.1 to 196; P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: Synchronous GI or biliary surgery with splenectomy for hematologic disease increases the risk of intra-abdominal abscess and should be avoided. Complication and mortality rates may also be increased.

Abdominal Abscess↗

Prospective randomised clinical trial of single versus double purse-string stapled mucosectomy in the treatment of prolapsed haemorrhoids.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite the excellent results published on circular stapled mucosectomy (CSM), there is still some concern about the application of PPH-33 in the advanced haemorrhoidal disease, where a major prolapse may lead to insufficient resection and ensuing early recurrence. This study is aimed at comparing the outcomes after single purse-string CSM versus double purse-string CSM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomised clinical trial of single versus double purse-string CSM for grade III-IV symptomatic haemorrhoids was used. One hundred consecutive patients were randomised to single (group 1, N=50) versus double purse-string CSM (group 2, N=50). RESULTS: The mean age was 50.7 years, with a predominance of males (63 vs. 37). Haemorrhoids were classified as grade III in 59% and grade IV in 41% of the patients. Mean follow-up was 26 months. Demographic and clinical features showed no differences between the two groups. The size of the resected doughnut was greater in group 2 (4.95 vs. 3.55 cm; p<0.05), as was the distance of the suture from the dentate line (3.56 vs. 3.16 cm; p<0.05). Early postoperative pain was significantly less in group 2 (linear analogue scale from 0 to 10), 2.08 vs. 3.56 (p<0.001). Postoperative haemorrhage was absent or minimal in 79% of patients. Three patients from group 1 reported persistent pain that was resolved within the first few postoperative months. There were two recurrences in group 1. CONCLUSION: Double purse-string CSM resects a greater doughnut, increases the distance of the staple suture from the dentate line and reduces early postoperative pain in comparison to single purse-string CSM. Larger series are necessary to assert whether recurrence is lower.

Adult↗

A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit. A randomized prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hernia repair has often been criticized for its high costs. METHODS: To compare the costs of laparoscopic and open hernia repair, 40 patients were randomized for either transabdominal laparoscopic or Lichtenstein mesh repair (under local anesthesia) in a day-case surgery unit. RESULTS: Median operative times for the laparoscopic and open groups were 62 and 65 min, respectively. Postoperative pain was comparable for the two groups. The period before return to normal life was 14 days in the laparoscopic group and 21 days in the open group. The hospital costs were 2051 FIM ($1 US = 4.6 FIM) higher in the laparoscopic group, but the total costs for employed patients (including expenses due to lost work days) were lower. CONCLUSION: Although the Lichtenstein operation is cheaper for the hospital, the total costs for working patients are lower with the laparoscopic technique, when the cost of lost work days is factored into overall expense.

Adult↗

Randomized controlled trials on hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery.

The randomized controlled trial (RCT) plays an important role not only in the performance of evidence-based medicine but also in the establishment of therapeutic guidelines. In this review, I analyzed RCTs on hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, particularly on malignant diseases. The number of RCTs on hepato-biliary-pancreatic cancers is smaller than that on other types of cancers. This might be related to their low resectability. In liver surgery, a recent increase in RCTs of operative techniques has almost established a standard transection method. In biliary tract and pancreatic cancers, only a few RCTs have been performed concerning operative strategy. Therefore, many issues should be solved by an adequate RCT observing statements of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.

Biliary Tract Neoplasms↗

Achalasia presenting after operative and nonoperative trauma.

Achalasia has been described following fundoplication and is attributed to vagal nerve damage during surgery. Similarly, other traumatic events to the distal esophagus may be linked to the development of achalasia. Operative and nonoperative trauma as a possible factor in the development of achalasia was studied. A retrospective analysis of patients with achalasia (n = 64) at our institution was performed. Collected data included age, gender, symptoms, and history of operative and nonoperative traumatic events. Comparisons were made to a group of patients with similar symptoms but normal esophageal manometry (n = 73). Achalasia was diagnosed by manometry in 125 patients over a 6-year period. All patients with complete medical records (n = 64) were studied. A history of operative or nonoperative trauma to the upper gastrointestinal tract prior to the development of symptomatic achalasia was present in 16 of 64 (25%). Significantly fewer patients (9.5%) with symptoms of dysphagia, but normal manometry and upper endoscopy, had precedent trauma to the upper gastrointestinal tract (P < 0.05). All cases of nonoperative trauma occurred in motor vehicle accidents. Cases of operative trauma included coronary artery bypass surgery (n = 4), bariatric surgery (n = 2), fundoplication (n = 3), heart/lung transplantation (n = 1), and others (n = 5). Patients with proven achalasia and a history of trauma were more likely to have chest pain (RR, 4.5; P = 0.012) but less likely to have regurgitation (RR, 0.51; P = 0.01) or nausea/vomiting (RR, 0.0; P = 0.27) than those without a history of antecedent trauma. In this series, significantly more patients with achalasia had a history of preceding trauma than did patients with similar symptoms and normal esophageal manometry. Following trauma, patients may be at increased risk for developing achalasia, possibly from neuropathic dysfunction due to vagal nerve damage. Patients with posttraumatic achalasia may have symptoms which differ from those of other achalasia patients.

Accidents, Traffic↗

[Evidence-based analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage].

Abdominal prophylactic drainage in digestive surgery was considered until recently as a dogma. But randomised controlled trials have questioned the routine use of abdominal drain in elective surgery. The aim of this review was to assess the usefulness of abdominal prophylactic drainage according to the concept of evidence-based medicine by analysing published randomised trials and meta-analyses. Levels of evidence vary greatly according to the type of surgery. One can conclude: with a good level of evidence that abdominal drainage has no place following elective cholecystectomy, appendicectomy and colectomy with intraperitoneal anastomosis; that it is perhaps unwarranted (lower level of evidence) following gastroduodenal surgery, pancreatectomy, splenectomy, and rectal surgery; and finally that could be indicated following oesophagectomy and common bile duct surgery (very low level of evidence). Nevertheless, when interpreting these data and evidence-based guidelines we should be consider the limitations of published studies (series coming from very expert teams, selected patients, short series, and elective surgery).

Abdomen↗

[Digestive surgery and varicose vein surgery].

The thromboembolic risk related to surgery may be considered as low for varicose vein surgery and non major digestive surgery. It could be defined as moderate in case of large dissection, long duration of procedures and emergency cases. The risk may be considered as high for major abdominal surgery involving cancer surgery or not and bariatric surgery. The absence of prophylaxis can be proposed for low risk surgery (grade B). However, elastic compression stocking are effective for all cases of digestive surgery and suggested to be used (grade A). There are no data concerning the moderate risk situation. Therefore, experts recommend the use of elastic compression stockings or low doses of LMWH (grade D). High-risk surgery requires the use of high doses of LMWH recommended for reasons of efficacy, tolerance, and easiness to use (grade A). Associated elastic stockings is efficious (grade B). The duration of prophylaxis lasts generally 7-10 days. Extension to 1 month is recommended for major abdominal cancer surgery (grade A).

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

Surgical management and outcomes of total colonic aganglionosis in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: Total colonic aganglionosis (TCA) is a rare form of Hirschsprung disease, and there is no consensus regarding its optimal surgical management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate different surgical approaches and outcomes in children with TCA. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase was performed for studies published between January 2000 and December 2025. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251078401). Eligible studies included patients aged &#x2264;18 years with TCA who underwent conventional pull-through procedures (CPT; Duhamel, Soave, Swenson, Rehbein, and Ikeda-Soper) or non-conventional techniques (NCPT; STATE procedure, J-pouch, right- or left-sided colonic patch pull-through, and ileocecal patch). A subgroup analysis comparing Duhamel and ileoanal pull-through procedures (IAPT) was also performed. Outcomes included fecal incontinence, Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC), requirement for additional interventions, postoperative intestinal obstruction, and mortality. Meta-analysis was performed using jamovi software, version 2.3.28, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Seven studies including 134 patients compared CPT (n = 85) with NCPT (n = 49), and ten studies including 274 patients compared Duhamel (n = 143) with IAPT (n = 131). Across both comparisons, pooled odds ratios (ORs) showed no statistically significant differences in fecal incontinence, HAEC, requirement for additional interventions, postoperative intestinal obstruction (Duhamel vs IAPT only), or mortality. For CPT versus NCPT, the pooled ORs were 1.1 for fecal incontinence (95% CI, 0.44-2.73; p = 0.837), 1.1 for HAEC (95% CI, 0.49-2.71; p = 0.743), 4.3 for requirement for additional interventions (95% CI, 0.86-22.1; p = 0.074), and 3.4 for mortality (95% CI, 0.52-21.5; p = 0.198). For Duhamel versus IAPT, the pooled ORs were 1.4 for fecal incontinence (95% CI, 0.60-3.36; p = 0.423), 0.6 for HAEC (95% CI, 0.22-2.06; p = 0.503), 1.8 for requirement for additional interventions (95% CI, 0.62-5.50; p = 0.262), 1.1 for postoperative intestinal obstruction (95% CI, 0.21-6.01; p = 0.875), and 1.03 for mortality (95% CI, 0.25-4.20; p = 0.965). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences were identified between CPT and NCPT or between Duhamel and IAPT for the evaluated outcomes in children with TCA. However, the absence of statistically significant differences should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalence, particularly given the small sample sizes, wide confidence intervals, and clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the studies included. The choice of surgical approach should be individualized according to disease extent, patient-specific factors, institutional experience, and surgical expertise. TYPE OF STUDY: Meta-analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Humans↗

Gastric emptying time, not enterogastric reflux, is related to symptoms after upper gastrointestinal/biliary surgery.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that symptoms from bile reflux gastritis are related to the frequency and degree of enterogastric reflux (EGR). METHODS: Patients with history of upper gastrointestinal surgery or cholecystectomy as well as control patients were studied. Presence of EGR, degree of EGR, and gastric bile emptying time were assessed and quantified via 99mTC scintillation imaging and then compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: Patients with vagotomy and pyloroplasty, Billroth I, Billroth II, and cholecystectomy demonstrated statistically higher degrees of EGR compared with controls. Although asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with a history of upper gastrointestinal or biliary surgery demonstrated no statistically significant differences between incidence of EGR and degree of EGR, there was a statistically significant difference in gastric emptying time. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed gastric emptying time, not frequency or extent of EGR, was associated with the symptoms of bile reflux in patients who had previous upper gastrointestinal or biliary operations.

Adult↗

Laparoscopic surgical procedures.

Therapeutic laparoscopic surgical procedures have rapidly become well established. Two commonly stated advantages are decreased postoperative pain and shortened hospitalization and recovery times in comparison with an open surgical procedure. Currently, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the procedure of choice for most patients with symptomatic gallstones, and many stones in the common bile duct can be retrieved by laparoscopic techniques. Laparoscopic appendectomy is a reasonable alternative with improved diagnostic capabilities in comparison with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic antireflux procedures, bowel resections, and repair of inguinal hernias are being performed in ever-increasing numbers; however, long-term results for these procedures are needed and are unavailable at the present time. Various diagnostic and palliative procedures can be done with use of laparoscopic techniques; they provide effective management with minimal perioperative morbidity. Solid organ resections can be safely undertaken laparoscopically in selected patients in whom the target organ is not massively enlarged. Currently, the indications for laparoscopic operations continue to broaden; however, long-term evaluation of laparoscopic surgical results and further improvements in technique and instrumentation are necessary before the appropriate and complete spectrum of laparoscopic surgical procedures will be realized.

Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures↗