Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Diclofenac”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1990

[Reduced diclofenac administration by B vitamins: results of a randomized double-blind study with reduced daily doses of diclofenac (75 mg diclofenac versus 75 mg diclofenac plus B vitamins) in acute lumbar vertebral syndromes].

Pain syndromes of the lumbar spine are one of the main problems in orthopedic practice. The therapeutic effect of NSAIDs is not subject to doubt in this connection. But considering that the application of NSAIDs is frequently associated with side effects, a reduction of dosage would be to the patient's benefit. Clinical studies have shown that concomitant treatment with vitamins B1, B6, B12 and diclofenac leads to a more efficient pain relief than treatment using diclofenac alone and thus provides the possibility of saving NSAIDs. This clinical trial was carried out in order to determine whether these results can also be achieved when a reduced dosage of diclofenac (75 mg daily) is used. 123 patients with acute pain syndromes of the lumbar spine were treated with either B-vitamins and diclofenac or diclofenac alone for a maximum of 7 days. There was the option to terminate therapy in the trial after 3-4 days in the case of total pain relief. 45 patients could stop the treatment due to remission of symptoms. 30 patients belonged to the combination therapy group, the other 15 took diclofenac alone; this difference is statistically significant (p less than 0.05). All parameters concerning pain relief and movement of the vertebral column showed statistically significant differences in favour of the B-vitamin-diclofenac-combination, too. The results document the positive influence of B-vitamins on painful vertebral syndromes and indicate that B-vitamins contribute to saving of NSAIDs by shortening the treatment time and reducing daily NSAID-dosage.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Double-blind evaluation of short-term analgesic efficacy of orally administered diclofenac, diclofenac plus codeine, and diclofenac plus imipramine in chronic cancer pain.

A prospective double-blind randomized trial was conducted on 184 cancer patients with moderate to severe chronic pain to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of diclofenac alone (50 mg q.i.d.) or in combination with a weak opioid (codeine 40 mg q.i.d.), or with an anti-depressant (imipramine, 10 or 25 mg t.i.d.). All demographic and clinical characteristics including cancer type, presence of bone metastases, baseline pain severity, neuropathic and nociceptive pain, and depressive state, were well balanced between the three treatment groups. The main analysis of the study was on the VAS scores at visit 2 (day 4). The mean VAS values for both associations imipramine plus diclofenac and codeine plus diclofenac were similar to the association placebo plus diclofenac. Patients on imipramine plus diclofenac and on placebo plus diclofenac were withdrawn mainly for inadequate efficacy, while patients on codeine plus diclofenac discontinued equally for inadequate efficacy or adverse events. In conclusion, in a short-term evaluation the addition of a tricyclic anti-depressant or a weak opioid to diclofenac did not provide further analgesia with respect to diclofenac administration alone.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Shortening diclofenac therapy by B vitamins. Results of a randomized double-blind study, diclofenac 50 mg versus diclofenac 50 mg plus B vitamins, in painful spinal diseases with degenerative changes].

The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) such as diclofenac for treatment of degenerative rheumatic disorders of the lumbar spine is of great significance in orthopedic practice. Clinical studies have shown that concomitant treatment with vitamins B1, B6, B12 and diclofenac provides more efficient pain relief than treatment using diclofenac alone. This study was undertaken in order to determine whether the duration of treatment with diclofenac for lower back pain can be shortened by adding B-vitamins to the therapeutic regimen. From September through December of 1986, 256 patients participated in a multicenter, controlled, randomized double-blind trial which compared the clinical efficacy of diclofenac (50 mg) with a combined therapy of diclofenac (50 mg) and vitamins B1, B6, and B12 (thiamine nitrate, pyridoxine hydrochloride, and cyanocobalamine, resp.; in dosages of 50 mg, 50 mg, and 0.25 mg, resp.). Patients were treated with 3 X 1 capsule daily for a maximum of two weeks, having the option to terminate participation in the trial after 1 week in the event of total pain relief. The data of 238 patients were able to be included in the evaluation. 29 patients opted to discontinue therapy due to remission on symptoms. Nineteen (65.6%) of these patients belonged to the combined therapy group, the other 10 (34.4%) having taken diclofenac alone; this difference is statistically significant (p less than 0.05). An important aspect in the evaluation of therapy was the patient response regarding the improvement of painful symptoms which, in addition to their subjective feedback, was reflected in the test results of the "Hoppe Pain Questionnaire (HPQ)." All parameters used as a measure of pain relief indicated superior results with the B-vitamin supplemented therapy when compared with results obtained with diclofenac alone. Moreover, after 3 days of therapy the "sensory" pain factor "sharpness" improved significantly. Undesirable side-effects were documented with 39 patients, 14 of them having discontinued therapy for this reason. No statistically significant difference could be determined within this group with regard to therapy. The study results document the positive influence of B-vitamins on painful symptoms and indicate that less NSAID is needed for pain relief when combined with B-vitamins.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1990

Interaction of myeloperoxidase with diclofenac. Inhibition of the chlorinating activity of myeloperoxidase by diclofenac and oxidation of diclofenac to dihydroxyazobenzene by myeloperoxidase.

The chlorinating activity of myeloperoxidase, isolated from human polymorphonuclear neutrophils, was inhibited by the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac (Voltaren). The concentration of diclofenac needed for 50% inhibition was 20 microM, a value comparable with IC50 values found for other drugs. Diclofenac did not react with HOCl nor with H2O2 but was oxidized in the presence of myeloperoxidase and H2O2 to an orange-coloured unstable product. The rate of oxidation was proportional to the enzyme concentration and to the concentration of diclofenac. but independent of the H2O2 concentration. Presumably both Compound I and Compound II, two intermediates formed during the reaction cycle of myeloperoxidase with H2O2 are able to oxidize diclofenac. In these redox reactions, the active short-living Compound I is reduced to Compound II, thereby inhibiting the chlorinating activity of the enzyme. Analysis by Fast Atom Bombardment mass spectrometry showed that in the presence of H2O2 myeloperoxidase oxidizes diclofenac to dihydroxyazobenzene.

Azo Compounds↗
PubMed2004

Diclofenac systemic exposure is not increased when topical diclofenac is applied to ultraviolet-induced erythema.

OBJECTIVES: Diclofenac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug used for a variety of painful and inflammatory conditions. A new low-dose, topical-gel form of diclofenac sodium (diclofenac-Na) has been developed for pain relief and redness reduction after sunburn. The objective was to compare exposure to oral diclofenac-Na with the systemic exposure to diclofenac after application of the new topical diclofenac-Na 0.1% Emulgel gel (diclofenac-Na gel) to normal skin and to that with ultraviolet-induced erythema relative. METHODS: This study was an open, single-centre, three-period, non-randomised trial in 18 healthy Caucasian subjects. During the first period, 12.5 g gel (12.5 mg diclofenac-Na) was applied twice on a single day to normal skin. During the second period, a 25-mg diclofenac-Na, enteric-coated tablet was given orally three times in a single day. During the third period, the diclofenac-Na gel was applied, as in the first period, but during the early phase of an erythema induced by three times the ultraviolet minimal erythema dose, i.e. a first-degree sunburn associated with pain. During each period, venous blood samples were collected over 24 h and urine was collected over 72 h after first administration for the determination of diclofenac in plasma and urine and of 4'-OH-diclofenac in urine. RESULTS: The systemic exposure after topical application of 25 mg diclofenac-Na on sunburned skin was less than 3% that of 75 mg oral diclofenac-Na and was not increased to that measured on normal skin. CONCLUSION: The diclofenac-Na 0.1% Emulgel gel can be applied safely to sunburned skin (superficial sunburn, i.e. first degree) as well as to normal skin.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1999

Interaction of diclofenac and quinidine in monkeys: stimulation of diclofenac metabolism.

The cytochrome P-450 (CYP)3A4-mediated metabolism of diclofenac is stimulated in vitro by quinidine. A similar effect is observed in incubations with monkey liver microsomes. We describe an in vivo interaction of diclofenac and quinidine that leads to enhanced clearance of diclofenac in monkeys. After a dose of diclofenac via portal vein infusion at 0.055 mg/kg/h, steady-state systemic plasma drug concentrations in three male rhesus monkeys were 87, 104, and 32 ng/ml, respectively (control). When diclofenac was coadministered with quinidine (0.25 mg/kg/h) via the same route, the corresponding plasma diclofenac concentrations were 50, 59, and 18 ng/ml, representing 57, 56, and 56% of control values, respectively. In contrast, steady-state systemic diclofenac concentrations in the same three monkeys were elevated 1.4 to 2.5 times when the monkeys were pretreated with L-754,394 (10 mg/kg i.v.), an inhibitor of CYP3A. Further investigation indicated that the plasma protein binding (>99%) and blood/plasma ratio (0.7) of diclofenac remained unchanged in the presence of quinidine. Therefore, the decreases in plasma concentrations of diclofenac after a combined dose of diclofenac and quinidine are taken to reflect increased hepatic clearance of the drug, presumably resulting from the stimulation of CYP3A-catalyzed oxidative metabolism. Consistent with this proposed mechanism, a 2-fold increase in the formation of 5-hydroxydiclofenac derivatives was observed in monkey hepatocyte suspensions containing diclofenac and quinidine. Stimulation of diclofenac metabolism by quinidine was diminished when monkey liver microsomes were pretreated with antibodies against CYP3A. Subsequent kinetic studies indicated that the K(m) value for the CYP-mediated conversion of diclofenac to its 5-hydroxy derivatives was little changed (75 versus 59 microM), whereas V(max) increased 2.5-fold in the presence of quinidine. These data suggest that the catalytic capacity of monkey hepatic CYP3A toward diclofenac metabolism is enhanced by quinidine.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of gastrointestinal permeability induced by diclofenac-phospholipid complex with diclofenac acid and its sodium salt.

PURPOSE: Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) diclofenac may be reduced if it is administered as a complex with phospholipid. The upper and lower GI permeability induced by a diclofenac-dipalmitoyl phosphatidyl choline (DPPC) complex were compared with those of diclofenac acid and its sodium salt in rats. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out to assess bioavailability of diclofenac preparations. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were dosed orally (equivalent to 15 mg/kg diclofenac sodium) as the acid or its sodium salt as well as diclofenac-DPPC complex. Upper and lower GI permeability, as surrogate markers of toxicity were determined using sucrose and 51Cr-EDTA, respectively. RESULTS: At 1 h post-dose only diclofenac sodium induced a significant increased upper GI permeability. Three h post-dose all formulations significantly increased upper GI permeability although the diclofenac acid had the least effect. In the lower GI tract, the induced increase in permeability was significant at 1 and 3 h post-dose for all formulations with no significant differences between them. CONCLUSION: The induced upper and lower GI toxicity of diclofenac was formulation and time dependent. The lack of effect of diclofenac acid was due to the decreased availability of the drug. In the upper GI tract, up to 1 h post-dose, the diclofenac-DPPC complex demonstrated reduced upper gastroduodenal permeability as measured by sucrose. However, the protective effect of DPPC did not last and was not extended to the lower GI tract due to the systemic effect, contribution from the enterohepatic recirculation and/or dissociation of the complex. In assessing diclofenac GI toxicity, the effect of the different formulations on the entire GI tract at various times after drug administration must be considered.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Corneal penetration of diclofenac from a fixed combination of diclofenac-gentamicin eyedrops.

PURPOSE: To establish the corneal penetration of diclofenac in the presence of gentamicin in patients having cataract surgery. SETTING: Kantonsspital Augenklinik, Aarau, and Hôpital Jules Gonin, Lausanne, Switzerland. METHODS: Eligible patients having cataract surgery (39 women, 30 men) were treated with 4 drops of diclofenac 0.1%-gentamicin 0.3% (Voltamicin) instilled at 20 minute intervals. Paracentesis was performed 15, 30, or 60 minutes after the last instillation, and a sample of aqueous humor was collected for analysis of diclofenac by high-performance liquid chromatography. Blood samples of some patients were obtained before surgery for analysis. RESULTS: Mean diclofenac levels (+/- SD) in the aqueous humor 15, 30, and 60 minutes after the last instillation were 72 +/- 84, 108 +/- 87, and 201 +/- 116 ng/mL (= 682 nMol/L), respectively. Diclofenac remained below the limit of detection (5 ng/mL) in all samples of blood serum. In general, local tolerance was good; no side effects were reported. Comparison of the data with published results of topically instilled diclofenac 0.1% suggests that the concentration of diclofenac in the aqueous humor achieved with 4 instillations of the combination product is similar to that achieved with 8 instillations of diclofenac 0.1% (Voltaren Ophtha) alone. CONCLUSIONS: Drug levels of diclofenac in the aqueous humor well above IC-50 for cyclo-oxygenase were achieved with the regimen applied. No inhibitory effect by the gentamicin or vehicle was observed. Comparison of these data with published results of Voltaren Ophtha implies a 2-fold better penetration of diclofenac with the diclofenac-gentamicin combination.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Acute treatment of migraine attacks: efficacy and safety of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, diclofenac-potassium, in comparison to oral sumatriptan and placebo. The Diclofenac-K/Sumatriptan Migraine Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Migraine attacks are often treated with simple analgesics or with ergotamine-containing preparations alone or in combination with anti-emetics. Although also sometimes used to treat migraine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have not been systematically evaluated in controlled clinical trials, particularly in comparison with the newer drug sumatriptan. Sumatriptan is a specific migraine treatment which has recently become among the most widely prescribed acute migraine therapies. However, while effective, it has low oral bioavailability and some problematic adverse effects. Diclofenac-potassium is a potent NSAID available as a fast-acting oral tablet, which has been shown to be safe and effective in several other acute pain indications. In the clinical trial reported here, the efficacy and safety of diclofenac-potassium in the acute treatment of migraine attacks has been tested in comparison with oral sumatriptan and placebo. METHODS: Single oral doses of 50 mg and 100 mg diclofenac-potassium were compared to a single oral dose of 100 mg sumatriptan and placebo in a double-blind randomized crossover trial in 156 adult patients suffering from migraine attacks, with or without aura, selected according to the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria. The primary efficacy criterion was migraine headache pain recorded on a visual analog scale at 2 h after dosing. Secondary endpoints included pain at other time points up to 8 h and the presence of accompanying symptoms (nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia). FINDINGS: Diclofenac-potassium was more effective than placebo in reducing migraine headache pain at 2 h after dosing, which was the primary endpoint. Secondary analyses showed that diclofenac-potassium provided significant pain relief from 60 min after dosing and for all remaining endpoints in the 8-h observation period. Both 50 and 100 mg doses of diclofenac-potassium were similarly effective. A similar effect was shown with sumatriptan; however, significant superiority to placebo was seen only from the 90-min time point. Diclofenac-potassium was generally superior to placebo or sumatriptan in reducing accompanying symptoms, particularly nausea. Diclofenac-potassium seemed to be as well tolerated as placebo, with fewer adverse events reported than after sumatriptan treatment and with more patients assessing the overall tolerability of diclofenac-potassium better than that of sumatriptan. INTERPRETATION: Compared with placebo and the reference therapy sumatriptan, diclofenac-potassium is an effective, fast-acting, and well-tolerated acute oral therapy for migraine attacks, with advantages over oral sumatriptan in terms of onset of analgesic effect, reduction of accompanying symptoms, and tolerability profile. It may therefore be useful as an alternative oral therapy for migraine attacks.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1991

A multi-centre comparative study of diclofenac sodium and a dipyrone/spasmolytic combination, and a single-centre comparative study of diclofenac sodium and pethidine in renal colic patients in India.

A single-blind, randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare the analgesic effectiveness in patients with renal colic of single intramuscular doses of diclofenac sodium (75 mg) versus a dipyrone (1 g)/spasmolytics combination, and diclofenac sodium (75 mg) versus pethidine (75 mg). The first study involved three centres, the second study one centre. In total, 107 patients were treated with diclofenac sodium, 85 with dipyrone/spasmolytics, and 25 with pethidine. Assessments were made during the first hour after drug administration of the degree of pain relief, the severity of pain using a visual analogue scale, and the duration of analgesia. A global assessment of treatment efficacy was made by the participating physicians at the end of the study period. Patients treated with diclofenac sodium showed an earlier onset of analgesia and a higher incidence of total pain relief compared to those treated with dipyrone/spasmolytics or pethidine. Although the mean duration of analgesia was only slightly greater in the diclofenac sodium group than in the dipyrone/spasmolytics group, a significantly longer effect was seen when diclofenac sodium was compared with pethidine (p less than 0.01). Pain severity assessments revealed that diclofenac sodium caused a significantly greater improvement in pain after 60 minutes compared to dipyrone/spasmolytics (p less than 0.05) and after 30 minutes compared to pethidine (p less than 0.05). Global efficacy assessments by the physician rated diclofenac sodium as significantly superior to dipyrone/spasmolytics (p less than 0.01) and pethidine (p less than 0.001). Moreover, diclofenac sodium was better tolerated than either of the comparative treatments. The results indicate that intramuscular diclofenac sodium is a useful alternative to the drugs commonly used in India in the treatment of renal colic.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Equivalence study of a topical diclofenac solution (pennsaid) compared with oral diclofenac in symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: . To compare the safety and efficacy of a topical diclofenac solution versus oral diclofenac in relieving the symptoms of primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy equivalence trial. METHODS: A total of 622 men and women with radiological evidence of primary knee OA and mild to severe symptoms were randomly assigned to treatment with a topical diclofenac solution plus placebo oral capsules, or placebo topical solution plus oral diclofenac (50 mg) capsules. Patients applied 50 drops of study solution and took 1 study capsule 3 times daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy variables were pain and physical function, measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) VA 3.1 OA Index, and patient global assessment (PGA). Equivalence in the per-protocol group was based on previously defined ranges of clinically significant difference. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory data. RESULTS: The difference in mean (95% CI) change scores (final minus baseline) between treatments was 13.3 mm (-8.6 to 35.2) for pain (total scale 500 mm), 71.0 mm (-2.4 to 144.5) for physical function (total scale 1700 mm), and 4.3 mm (-1.2 to 9.8) for PGA (total scale 100 mm). The CI for each efficacy variable fell within the predefined equivalence ranges (pain, +/- 75 mm; physical function, +/- 255 mm; PGA, +/- 20 mm), indicating that no clinically relevant difference was found between the 2 treatment arms. Safety analyses of patients applying topical diclofenac solution revealed some minor skin irritation at the application site--mostly skin dryness in 83/311 (27%) patients--but a significantly reduced incidence, relative to oral diclofenac, of total and severe gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events, including dyspepsia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and nausea. The number of patients developing abnormal liver function tests (including clinically significant elevation), hemoglobin, and creatinine clearance was significantly higher in the oral diclofenac group. CONCLUSION: Application of this topical diclofenac solution to the knee of patients with OA produced relief of symptoms equivalent to oral diclofenac, with minor local skin irritation, but significantly reduced incidence of diclofenac-related GI complaints and abnormal laboratory values.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Mechanistic studies on the bioactivation of diclofenac: identification of diclofenac-S-acyl-glutathione in vitro in incubations with rat and human hepatocytes.

Diclofenac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, is metabolized to diclofenac-1-O-acyl glucuronide (D-1-O-G), a chemically reactive conjugate that has been implicated as playing a role in the idiosyncratic hepatoxicity associated with its use. The present studies investigated the ability of diclofenac to be metabolized to diclofenac-S-acyl-glutathione thioester (D-SG) in vitro in incubations with rat and human hepatocytes and whether its formation is dependent on a transacylation-type reaction between D-1-O-G and glutathione. When diclofenac (100 microM) was incubated with hepatocytes, D-SG was detected in both rat and human incubation extracts by a sensitive LC-MS/MS technique. The initial formation rate of D-SG in rat and human hepatocyte incubations was rapid and reached maximum concentrations of 1 and 0.8 nM, respectively, after 4 min of incubation. By contrast, during incubations with rat hepatocytes, the formation of D-1-O-G increased over 30 min of incubation, reaching a maximum concentration of 14.6 microM. Co-incubation of diclofenac (50 microM) with (-)-borneol (400 microM), an inhibitor of glucuronidation, led to a 94% decrease in D-1-O-G formation, although no significant decrease in D-SG production was observed. Together, these results indicate that diclofenac becomes metabolically activated in vitro in rat and human hepatocytes to reactive acylating derivatives that transacylate glutathione forming D-SG, but which is not solely dependent on transacylation by the D-1-O-G metabolite. From these results, it is proposed that reactive acylating metabolites of diclofenac, besides D-1-O-G, may be significant in the protein acylation that occurs in vivo and therefore also be important with regard to the mechanism(s) of diclofenac-mediated idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity.

Acylation↗
PubMed1991

In vitro percutaneous transport of sodium diclofenac and diclofenac from oleaginous vehicle.

The penetration enhancement of sodium diclofenac and diclofenac by alcohols with various alkyl chains (C8 to C14) was evaluated by the steady state flux of diclofenac through rat abdominal skin. Decanol showed the greatest effect in this series. A more remarkable enhancing effect of the alcohols was observed in sodium diclofenac than in diclofenac. Diclofenac can penetrate through the ethylene-vinyl acetate membrane as a lipoid model membrane, but sodium diclofenac can not. Decanol enhanced the penetration of phenol red being dependent on its concentration in the vehicle. Therefore, decanol may interact with lipoid components of the skin and increase the aqueous pathway in the skin. These results indicate that sodium diclofenac and diclofenac may be penetrated through partially different pathways.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

[Results of a double-blind study of diclofenac + vitamin B1, B6, B12 versus diclofenac in patients with acute pain of the lumbar vertebrae. A multicenter study].

Several clinical trials have shown that the duration of treatment of painful vertebral syndromes can be shortened by using a combination of vitamins B1, B6, B12 and diclofenac instead of diclofenac. In addition, a more efficient pain relief could be achieved by the combination therapy. In order to confirm these results, we compared the clinical efficacy of diclofenac (25 mg) and a combination preparation with diclofenac (25 mg) plus vitamins B1 (thiamine nitrate 50 mg), B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride 50 mg) and B12 (cyanocobalamin 0.25 mg) in a multicentric randomized double-blind study including 418 patients. All patients received 3 x 2 capsules daily for a maximum of 2 weeks. In case of total pain relief, therapy should be discontinued after one week. Data of 376 patients could be evaluated. 53 out of 184 patients receiving the combination and 48 out of 192 patients treated with diclofenac alone could stop therapy due to sufficient pain relief after one week. The evaluation of the "Hoppe Pain Questionnaire" and the data concerning pain intensity also revealed better results for the combination preparation. The differences in favour of the B-vitamin-diclofenac-combination were statistically significant in patients with severe pain at the beginning of therapy. Considering undesirable side-effects (symptoms in 70 out of 418 patients) there were no significant differences between the two medications. This clinical trial provides further evidence that the combination therapy with diclofenac plus B-vitamins is more effective than diclofenac alone for the treatment of painful vertebral syndromes.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Cardiovascular outcomes with etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in the Multinational Etoricoxib and Diclofenac Arthritis Long-term (MEDAL) programme: a randomised comparison.

BACKGROUND: Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitors have been associated with an increased risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events in placebo-controlled trials, but no clinical trial has been reported with the primary aim of assessing relative cardiovascular risk of these drugs compared with traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The MEDAL programme was designed to provide a precise estimate of thrombotic cardiovascular events with the COX-2 selective inhibitor etoricoxib versus the traditional NSAID diclofenac. METHODS: We designed a prespecified pooled analysis of data from three trials in which patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned to etoricoxib (60 mg or 90 mg daily) or diclofenac (150 mg daily). The primary hypothesis stated that etoricoxib is not inferior to diclofenac, defined as an upper boundary of less than 1.30 for the 95% CI of the hazard ratio for thrombotic cardiovascular events in the per-protocol analysis. Intention-to-treat analyses were also done to assess consistency of results. These trials are registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov with the numbers NCT00092703, NCT00092742, and NCT00250445. FINDINGS: 34 701 patients (24 913 with osteoarthritis and 9 787 with rheumatoid arthritis) were enrolled. Average treatment duration was 18 months (SD 11.8). 320 patients in the etoricoxib group and 323 in the diclofenac group had thrombotic cardiovascular events, yielding event rates of 1.24 and 1.30 per 100 patient-years and a hazard ratio of 0.95 (95% CI 0.81-1.11) for etoricoxib compared with diclofenac. Rates of upper gastrointestinal clinical events (perforation, bleeding, obstruction, ulcer) were lower with etoricoxib than with diclofenac (0.67 vs 0.97 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio 0.69 [0.57-0.83]), but the rates of complicated upper gastrointestinal events were similar for etoricoxib (0.30) and diclofenac (0.32). INTERPRETATION: Rates of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with arthritis on etoricoxib are similar to those in patients on diclofenac with long-term use of these drugs.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Analysis of diclofenac and its metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography: relevance of CYP2C9 genotypes in diclofenac urinary metabolic ratios.

In humans, diclofenac is metabolised to 4'-hydroxy (OH), 3'-OH and 5-OH metabolites. The polymorphic CYP2C9 is involved in the metabolism of diclofenac to 4'-OH diclofenac and 3'-OH diclofenac. The aim of the present study was to develop a high-performance liquid chromatographic method to simultaneously measure diclofenac and its metabolites in urine, suitable for metabolic studies. After liquid-liquid extraction the compounds were separated in a reversed-phase column and measured by ultraviolet absorption at 282 nm. For all compounds intra-day and inter-day variations were less than 7%, and the limits of quantitation were 0.25 mg/l. No analytical interference with endogenous compounds was found. The relationship between diclofenac metabolic ratios among different CYP2C9 genotypes is reported. The CYP2C9*3/*3 subject had the highest diclofenac/4'-OH ratios. However no difference was found between CYP2C9*2/*2 and *1/*1 genotypes. The chromatographic method developed was sensitive and reliable for the measurement of diclofenac and its metabolites simultaneously in human urine, and is suitable for use in diclofenac metabolism studies.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed1995

Salsalate, a nonacetylated salicylate, is as efficacious as diclofenac in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Salsalate-Diclofenac Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of salsalate, a nonacetylated salicylate, in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Three hundred and one patients meeting the ACR criteria for RA were drawn from 16 centers. After withdrawal of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) and subsequent flare, patients were randomized to receive either salsalate or diclofenac for 8 weeks, according to a double blind, double dummy protocol. Initial doses of salsalate 3.0 g/day and diclofenac 75 mg/day were titrated for the first 5 weeks. The primary outcome measure was a multivariate analysis at 8 weeks of tender joint count, pain, visual analog scale score, and physician's global assessment. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The mean stabilized dose of salsalate was 3.55 g/day, and that of diclofenac 112 mg/day. Discontinuations were due to lack of efficacy (17 salsalate vs 15 diclofenac); adverse events [19 salsalate (mainly tinnitus and hearing loss; p = 0.0001 and p = 0.04, respectively) vs 9 diclofenac]; laboratory abnormalities (3 salsalate vs 1 diclofenac); and other reasons, including protocol violations, intercurrent illness, and personal factors (24 salsalate vs 23 diclofenac). Both treatments produced significant improvement from flare (p < 0.0001). Post hoc power analysis showed that the study had sufficient power (0.60 to 0.90) to detect clinically important differences between the 2 drugs in the primary outcome measures; however, no statistically significant (p = 0.29) or clinically important treatment differences were recorded. Other than a difference in erythrocyte sedimentation rate that favored salsalate, there were no significant differences in secondary outcome measures between the 2 groups. All outcomes showed a tendency for more improvement with salsalate. CONCLUSION: Salsalate is as efficacious as diclofenac. Salsalate may be considered an alternative to other NSAID in the first line treatment of patients with RA.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Local absorption kinetics into the portal system using the portal-venous concentration difference after an oral dose of diclofenac in the awakening rat. Accelerative effect of bile on intestinal absorption of diclofenac.

The local absorption kinetics from the intestinal tract into the portal system was evaluated using the portal-venous concentration difference (P-V difference) after oral administration of diclofenac in conscious rats. The local absorption ratio (Fa), mean local absorption time (ta), and relative variance (sigma 2/ta2) from the intestinal tract into the portal system were estimated by simultaneously measuring the portal and venous concentrations, using diclofenac as a model drug. The effect of bile on diclofenac intestinal absorption was also investigated. The awakening rats simultaneously cannulated into the jugular and portal veins were divided into group A with intact enterohepatic circulation (EHC) and into another group with bile-duct cannulation to block EHC. The rats in the latter group were further divided into group B without the bile supply to the intestinal tract and into group C with the bile supply from the other rat. After oral administration of diclofenac to rats in groups A, B, and C, the portal and venous concentrations of diclofenac in each rat were simultaneously monitored by HPLC method at proper time intervals. The absorption time profile of diclofenac into the portal system was directly predicted from P-V difference. Plasma concentrations of diclofenac in the portal vein were constantly higher than those in the jugular vein after the oral administration. It was demonstrated that P-V difference was caused by absorption from the intestinal tract into the portal system. Fa in groups A, B, and C were estimated to be 91.5% for 8 hr, 33.8% for 3 hr, and 57.8% for 3 hr, respectively. ta in groups A, B, and C were estimated to be 2.26 hr, 0.65 hr, and 0.96 hr, respectively. sigma 2/ta2 in groups A, B, and C were 1.31, 0.48, and 0.55, respectively. Fa and ta of diclofenac extensively increased in the presence of the bile in the intestinal tract, whereas sigma 2/ta2 was unaffected by the bile. The mean absorption time (MAT) almost agreed with ta, which demonstrates that the mean transit time through the liver (tH) is negligible in MAT(= ta+tH).

Administration, Oral↗