Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Dexmethylphenidate Hydrochloride”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride and d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride (d-MPH, Focalin) for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and to test an a priori hypothesis that d-MPH would have a longer duration of action than d,l-threo-methylphenidate (d,l-MPH). METHOD: This was a randomized, double-blind study conducted at 12 U.S. centers. One hundred thirty-two subjects received d-MPH (n=44), d,l-MPH (n=46), or placebo (n=42) twice daily for 4 weeks, with titration of the dose based on weekly clinic visits. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline to last study visit on teacher-completed Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale (Teacher SNAP). Secondary efficacy measures included the change on parent-completed SNAP (Parent SNAP), Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) score, and Math Test performance. Assessments at home in late afternoon were included to test the hypothesis that d-MPH would have a longer duration of efficacy than d,l-MPH. Safety was assessed through monitoring occurrence and severity of adverse events and discontinuations related to them. RESULTS: Treatment with either d-MPH (p=.0004) or d,l-MPH (p=.0042) significantly improved Teacher SNAP ratings compared with placebo. The d-MPH group showed significant improvements compared with placebo on the afternoon Parent SNAP ratings (p=.0003) and scores on the Math Test (p=.0236) obtained late in the afternoon at 6:00 p.m. Sixty-seven percent of patients showed improvement on d-MPH and 49% on d,l-MPH based on CGI-I scores. Both d-MPH and d,l-MPH were well tolerated, no patient in the d-MPH group and only two patients each in the d,l-MPH and placebo groups discontinued the study. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of ADHD, an average titrated dose of 18.25 mg/day of d-MPH is as efficacious and safe as an average titrated dose of 32.14 mg/day of d,l-MPH. Both active treatments have large effect sizes. Thus, d-MPH and d,l-MPH appear to provide similar efficacy, and d-MPH may have longer duration of action after twice-daily dosing, but additional studies are needed to determine the statistical and clinical significance of this possibility.

Administration, Oral↗

A double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVES: d,l-threo-methylphenidate HCl (D,L-MPH) is the most common treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A previous report showed placebo-controlled efficacy for the purified d-isomer (dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride, d-MPH, Focalin) with a 2:1 potency compared to dl, and suggested a 6-hour duration of action. This study complements that report by studying the effect of placebo-controlled discontinuation and retesting the duration of action. METHODS: A 6-week, open-label titration of d-MPH (2.5-10 mg twice-a-day) was followed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-week withdrawal study of responders. RESULTS: In the open titration, 82% of the 89 enrolled patients achieved a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) rating of much or very much improved. Only 5 patients discontinued for adverse events. Seventy-five patients continued into the placebo-controlled discontinuation. For the randomly assigned d-MPH (n=35) and placebo (n=40) groups, mean ages, respectively, were 10.1 +/- 2.9 and 9.9 +/- 2.7 years, 86% and 78% were male, and 70.6% and 80.0% took the ceiling dose of 10 mg twice-daily, respectively. Each group had 80% combined type ADHD and 20% inattentive type. By the end of the 2-week, placebo-masked withdrawal, significantly more placebo patients (24 of 39) than d-MPH continuers (6 of 35) relapsed (61.5% versus 17.1%, p=0.001). Compared to d-MPH continuers, placebo patients deteriorated significantly more in the 2-week period on teacher ratings of the 18 ADHD symptoms rated 0-3 (p=0.028), the 3 p.m. and 6 p.m. parent ADHD symptom ratings (p=0.0026 and p=0.0381, respectively), and clinic (2-3 p.m.) and home (6 p.m.) Math Tests (p=0.024 and p<0.0001, respectively). The 6 p.m. scores replicated the significant effect at 6 hours reported in the previous study. CONCLUSIONS: d-MPH is safe, tolerable, and effective, with a 6-hour duration of effect suggested by the significant difference from placebo at 6 hours on a double-blind discontinuation.

Adolescent↗

Open-label study of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

BACKGROUND: This pilot study examined the efficacy and duration of the effect of dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH) given once-daily in subjects with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: Subjects aged 6-18 years (inclusive) with ADHD were enrolled in this 8-week, openlabel study. Outcome measures included the Conners'Teacher and Parent Rating Scales, the Attention Deficit Disorder Rating Scale (ADDRS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale, and teacher and parent visual analog scales to estimate the duration of efficacy. d-MPH was initiated at a dose of 2.5 mg/day. The dose was flexible, based on response and tolerability, and could be increased in increments of 2.5 mg/day to a maximum daily dose of 30 mg/day. RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects (mean age, 8.7 +/- 0.4 years) were treated. Significant improvements (p <0.0001) from baseline occurred in the Conners' Teacher and Parent Rating Scales after 8 weeks. Of the evaluated subjects, 85.7% (18 of 21) showed at least a 30% improvement from baseline on the Conners' Teacher Rating Scale, and 86.4% (19 of 22) of subjects showed at least a 30% improvement from baseline on the Conners' Parent Rating Scale. Most subjects demonstrated an improvement on the ADDRS and the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Median duration of effect was estimated at 6.2 hours (teachers) and at 7.5 hours (parents). On average, patients gained 2.4 pounds over the course of the study. CONCLUSIONS: A single daily dose of d-MPH was effective in controlling ADHD in children and was well tolerated. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and to evaluate chronic dosing with d-MPH.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗

Dexmethylphenidate--Novartis/Celgene. Focalin, D-MPH, D-methylphenidate hydrochloride, D-methylphenidate, dexmethylphenidate, dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride.

Celgene has developed a chirally pure form of methylphenidate (Ritalin), called dexmethylphenidate [d-methylphenidate, d-methylphenidate hydrochloride, d-MPH; Focalin]. The drug has been launched in the USA and is undergoing registration in Canada for the treatment of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Dexmethylphenidate is the single isomer version of racemic methylphenidate (Ritalin), which contains the active d isomer of Ritalin. Dexmethylphenidate acts via the inhibition of reuptake of norepinephrine and dopamine. Research is ongoing to further clarify the mode of therapeutic action in ADHD. Dexmethylphenidate was developed with the aim of reducing drug load, adverse events and drug interactions. Dexmethylphenidate provides effective management of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder at half the dose of Ritalin. In April 2000, worldwide rights (excluding Canada) to dexmethylphenidate were granted to Novartis. Celgene has also granted Novartis rights to all related intellectual properties and patents. Novartis will fund all remaining development and marketing expenses required for regulatory approval and commercialisation of dexmethylphenidate. Crystaal Corporation, the marketing division of Biovail Corporation International, has exclusive Canadian marketing rights for all formulations of dexmethylphenidate. Novartis launched dexmethylphenidate (Focalin) in the USA during Q1 2002. It is available as a D-shaped tablet (2.5, 5 and 10 mg doses). Novartis had planned to use the tradename Ritadex, however the FDA recommended an alternative name due to potential prescribing errors with Ritalin. The finalized tradename to be used is Focalin. In July 2001, a new drug submission was filed with Canada's Therapeutic Products Programme for dexmethylphenidate in the treatment of attention-deficit disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Novartis is also developing an extended-release version of chirally pure dexmethylphenidate. Dexmethylphenidate has been found to be effective and well tolerated in clinical trials, involving a total of 684 children with ADHD and in 15 healthy adult volunteers. Dexmethylphenidate is a schedule II drug.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗

Gateways to clinical trials.

Gateways to Clinical Trials is a guide to the most recent clinical trials in current literature and congresses. The data in the following tables has been retrieved from the Clinical Studies Knowledge Area of Prous Science Integrity(R), the drug discovery and development portal, http://integrity.prous.com. This issue focuses on the following selection of drugs: ABI-007, adalimumab, adefovir dipivoxil, alefacept, alemtuzumab, 3-AP, AP-12009, APC-8015, L-Arginine hydrochloride, aripiprazole, arundic acid, avasimibe; Bevacizumab, bivatuzumab, BMS-181176, BMS-184476, BMS-188797, bortezomib, bosentan, botulinum toxin type B, BQ-123, BRL-55730, bryostatin 1; CEP-1347, cetuximab, cinacalcet hydrochloride, CP-461, CpG-7909; D-003, dabuzalgron hydrochloride, darbepoetin alfa, desloratadine, desoxyepothilone B, dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride, DHA-paclitaxel, diflomotecan, DN-101, DP-b99, drotrecogin alfa (activated), duloxetine hydrochloride, duramycin; Eculizumab, Efalizumab, EKB-569, elcometrine, enfuvirtide, eplerenone, erlotinib hydrochloride, ertapenem sodium, eszopiclone, everolimus, exatecan mesilate, ezetimibe; Fenretinide, fosamprenavir calcium, frovatriptan; GD2L-KLH conjugate vaccine, gefitinib, glufosfamide, GTI-2040; Hexyl insulin M2, human insulin, hydroquinone, gamma-Hydroxybutyrate sodium; IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL, imatinib mesylate, indisulam, inhaled insulin, ixabepilone; KRN-5500; LY-544344; MDX-210, melatonin, mepolizumab, motexafin gadolinium; Natalizumab, NSC-330507, NSC-683864; 1-Octanol, omalizumab, ortataxel; Pagoclone, peginterferon alfa-2a, peginterferon alfa-2b, pemetrexed disodium, phenoxodiol, pimecrolimus, plevitrexed, polyphenon E, pramlintide acetate, prasterone, pregabalin, PX-12; QS-21; Ragaglitazar, ranelic acid distrontium salt, RDP-58, recombinant glucagon-like peptide-1 (7-36) amide, repinotan hydrochloride, rhEndostatin, rh-Lactoferrin, (R)-roscovitine; S-8184, semaxanib, sitafloxacin hydrate, sitaxsentan sodium, sorafenib, synthadotin; Tadalafil, tesmilifene hydrochloride, theratope, tipifarnib, tirapazamine, topixantrone hydrochloride, trabectedin, traxoprodil, Tri-Luma; Valdecoxib, valganciclovir hydrochloride, vinflunine; Ximelagatran; Ziconotide.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Gateways to clinical trials.

Gateways to Clinical Trials is a guide to the most recent clinical trials in current literature and congresses. The data in the following tables has been retrieved from the Clinical Studies knowledge area of Prous Science Integrity, the drug discovery and development portal, http://integrity.prous.com. This issue focuses on the following selection of drugs: Abacavir sulfate, abarelix, adalimumab, adefovir dipivoxil, AdGVVEGF121.10, anastrozole, anecortave acetate, aripiprazole, asulacrine isethionate, atazanavir, ATL-962, 16-Aza-epothilone B; Bevacizumab, bicalutamide, blonanserin, BMS-188667, bosentan; Celecoxib, celmoleukin, cetuximab, cilomilast, cinacalcet hydrochloride, CNTF(Ax15), colesevelam hydrochloride; Daclizumab, delavirdine mesilate, desogestrel, desoxyepothilone B, dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride, duloxetine hydrochloride; Ecogramostim, emtricitabine, epalrestat, escitalopram oxalate, examorelin, exendin-4, ezetimibe; Fidarestat, frovatriptan; HIV-1 Immunogen; Iloperidone, insulin detemir, insulin lispro, irinotecan hydrochloride; Keratinocyte growth factor; Lasofoxifene tartrate, levetiracetam, levormeloxifene, levosimendan, lumiracoxib, LY-307161 SR; Memantine hydrochloride, MEN-10755, metformin hydrochloride, metreleptin, motexafin gadolinium; Naratriptan hydrochloride, natalizumab, nesiritide, nicotine, NN-2211, NN-414; Olanzapine, omalizumab; Pegaptanib sodium, peginterferon alfa-2a, peginterferon alfa-2b, pegvisomant, pimecrolimus, pirfenidone, pramlintide acetate prasterone, pregabalin; Quetiapine fumarate; Rabeprazole sodium, raloxifene hydrochloride, raltitrexed, rDNA insulin, rFGF-2, risedronate sodium, rofecoxib, roflumilast, rosiglitazone maleate; SN-22995; Tacrolimus, tadalafil, tegaserod maleate, tiotropium bromide, tomoxetine hydrochloride, trastuzumab, trimegestone; Voglibose, Voriconazole; Ziprasidone hydrochloride.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

A single-dose, two-way crossover, bioequivalence study of dexmethylphenidate HCl with and without food in healthy subjects.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children is effectively treated by racemic oral methylphenidate (dl-MPH). The d-isomer (d-MPH) has been developed as an improved treatment for ADHD since only half the racemic dose is used. This study, performed in healthy subjects, assessed the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride (d-MPH HCl) in a single dose (2 x 10-mg tablets), two-way crossover with d-MPH administered to subjects in both a fasting state or after a high-fat breakfast. There were no serious or unexpected adverse events during the course of this study, with most events reported in comparable numbers of fed and fasted subjects. The bioequivalence of d-MPH was similar with or without food, with 90% confidence intervals of 88.2% to 104.6% and 105.9% to 118.2% for ln(C(max)) and ln[(AUC(0-infinity))], respectively. There was a marginal but statistically significant 1-hour increase in t(max) in the fed versus fasted state, reflecting an absorption delay. The rate of formation of the major metabolite, d-ritalinic acid (d-RA), was marginally decreased ( approximately 14%) after food. The extent of exposure to d-RA was similar (within 1.2%) between both treatments. There was a marginal but statistically significant difference in mean t(max) for d-RA between fed and fasted conditions, with peak concentration occurring 1.5 hours later after d-MPH administration with food. There was no measurable in vivo chiral inversion of d-MPH to l-MPH in plasma. In addition, the metabolism of d-MPH was stereospecific as d-MPH only produced d-RA. In summary, food had no substantial effect on the bioavailability of d-MPH, with an equivalent rate and extent of exposure obtained. Therefore, d-MPH can be administered without regard to food intake.

Adult↗

Gateways to clinical trials.

Gateways to Clinical Trials is a guide to the most recent clinical trials in current literature and congresses. The data in the following tables has been retrieved from the Clinical Studies knowledge area of Prous Science Integrity, the drug discovery and development portal, http://integrity.prous.com. This issue focuses on the following selection of drugs: 81C6; Adefovir dipivoxil, Agalsidase alfa, AGM-1470, albumin interferon alfa, alefacept, alosetron hydrochloride, anakinra, anti-CTLA-4 Mab, aprepitant, aripiprazole, atazanavir; BAY-43-9006, BBR-3438, beta-L-Fd4C, bimatoprost, bortezomib, bosentanBR96-doxorubicin; Caspofungin acetate, ciclesonide, cilengitide, cilomilast, COL-1621, COL-3, CpG-7909, cyclosporine; DCVax-Brain, dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride, dexosome vaccine (melanoma), donepezil hydrochloride, drotrecogin alfa (activated), DTI-015, [99Tc]-DTPA-mannosyldextran, duloxetine hydrochloride; Emivirine, emtricitabine, entecavir, epothilone B, estradiol-MNP, etonogestrel/etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol, etoricoxib; Febuxostat, fondaparinux sodium, fosamprenavir calcium; Gefitinib, GVS-111; Heparinase I, HspE7, human alpha-glucosidase, human insulin; Imatinib mesylate, INGN-241, interferon alfa B/D hybrid, interferon alfa Biphasix, ISIS-14803; Lanicemine hydrochloride, 1311-lipiodol, liposome-encapsulated mitoxantrone, lixivaptan, lumiracoxib, lupus-AHP, LY-466700; Marimastat, MEN-10755, micafungin sodium; Nitronaproxen, NSC-683864 Omalizumab, oral insulin; Palonosetron hydrochloride, peginterferon alfa-2a, pimecrolimus, pralnacasan, pramlintide acetate, pregabalin, pyrazoloacridine; R-165335, ranolazine, risperidone, RPR-109881;, RSD-1235, Satraplatin, seocalcitol, sertindole, SMART anti-interferon gamma antibody, sulfasalazine; T-138067, TAK-013, tegaserod maleate, telithromycin, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, teriparatide, tiotropium bromide, tipifarnib, TP-38; Valdecoxib, vatalanib succinate, voriconazole; ZD-9331.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

A post hoc analysis of d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (focalin) versus d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (ritalin).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical measures of the benefit/risk ratio in a post hoc analysis of a clinical trial of d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (d-MPH) and d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (d,l-MPH). METHOD: Data from a phase III clinical trial was used to compare equimolar doses of d-MPH and d,l-MPH treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on clinician ratings of improvement/deterioration, teacher ratings of remission, and duration of action. RESULTS: d-MPH was clinically and statistically significantly superior to d,l-MPH on clinician's dimensional ratings of global improvement, teacher ratings of remission of ADHD symptoms and parent 6:00 p.m. ADHD symptom ratings. No treatment differences were observed for symptom ratings at 3:00 p.m. and for 6:00 p.m. math test performance. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the two drugs may have distinct profiles on the measures analyzed. Because d-MPH may have be more than twice the potency of d,l-MPH, the differences reported here are only applicable to the doses of the study drugs involved in the clinical trial. The results are limited by the exploratory nature of our analysis, small samples, and multiple analyses. The findings are suggestive that further study is warranted to look at these differences prospectively but cannot be used to draw clinical conclusions at this time.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗

D-methylphenidate and D,L-methylphenidate are not developmental toxicants in rats and rabbits.

BACKGROUND: D,L-threo-Methylphenidate (D,L-MPH) is marketed currently for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children. D-threo-methylphenidate (dexmethylphenidate; D-MPH) is a refined formulation of D,L-methylphenidate containing only the active enantiomer and was recently approved in the U.S. for the same condition. D-Methylphenidate has been shown to be efficacious in patients at half the dose of D,L-MPH with a potentially improved therapeutic profile. The developmental toxicity of both compounds was determined and compared in rats and rabbits according to current International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines. METHODS: Groups of pregnant rats were orally dosed twice daily 6 hr apart from Days 7 to 17 of presumed gestation (DG 7-17) for total daily doses of 2, 6 and 20 mg/kg D-MPH and 40 mg/kg D,L-MPH. Groups of presumed pregnant rabbits were similarly dosed from DG 6 to 18 for total daily doses of 4, 20 and 100 mg/kg D-MPH and 200 mg/kg D,L-MPH. Control groups for both studies were given water vehicle. Comprehensive clinical and developmental measurements were made. Satellite groups of animals were included in the main rat and rabbit studies for toxicokinetic assessment. RESULTS: No drug-related mortality was seen in the F0 rats and rabbits. The number of rats with repetitive pawing, dilated pupil and aggression was significantly greater for the 40 mg/kg D,L-MPH compared to the 20 mg/kg D-MPH dosed rats. Maternal body weight and body weight gain were significantly reduced for both D-MPH and D,L-MPH groups compared to control. Maternal reproductive and litter parameters were unaffected by both drugs. No gross external, soft tissue, or skeletal alterations related to both compounds were seen in the fetuses. In rabbits, head-bobbing and hyperpnea were significantly greater for the 200 mg/kg D,L-MPH compared to 100 mg/kg D-MPH. No other maternal or fetal effects related to both compounds were seen. Exposure to D-MPH (as assessed by AUC) showed no teratogenic effects at exposures of up to 5.6 and 1.7 times for the rat and rabbit respectively compared to children taking the maximum therapeutic dose of 20 mg/day (10 mg twice a day). No teratogenic effects were seen for D,L-MPH in rat and rabbit at exposures of up to 3.7 to 11.7 times that of the maximum therapeutic pediatric dose of 60 mg/ day. CONCLUSIONS: Rats and rabbits dosed with D,L-MPH exhibited significantly greater incidence of maternal clinical observations at twice the dose of D-MPH. Both D-MPH and D,L-MPH were not teratogenic in rats and rabbits at higher exposure levels compared to humans.

Administration, Oral↗

Differential effects of amphetamine isomers on dopamine release in the rat striatum and nucleus accumbens core.

RATIONALE: Current medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) include some single isomer compounds [dextroamphetamine (D: -amphetamine, dexedrine) and dexmethylphenidate (Focalin)] and some racemic compounds [methylphenidate and mixed-salts amphetamine (Adderall)]. Adderall, which contains approximately 25% L: -amphetamine, has been successfully marketed as a first-line medication for ADHD. Although different clinical effects have been observed for D: -amphetamine, Adderall, and benzedrine; potential psychopharmacological differences on the level of neurotransmission between D: -amphetamine and L: -amphetamine have not been well characterized. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate potential differences in the isomers, we used the technique of high-speed chronoamperometry with Nafion-coated single carbon-fiber microelectrodes to measure amphetamine-induced release of dopamine (DA) in the striatum and nucleus accumbens core of anesthetized male Fischer 344 rats. Amphetamine solutions were locally applied by pressure ejection using micropipettes. RESULTS: The presence of L: -amphetamine in the D: ,L: -amphetamine solutions did not cause increased release of DA but did change DA release kinetics. The D: ,L: -amphetamine-evoked signals exhibited significantly faster rise times and shorter signal decay times. This difference was also observed in the nucleus accumbens core. When L: -amphetamine was locally applied, DA release was not significantly different in amplitude, and it exhibited the same rapid kinetics of D: ,L: -amphetamine. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that amphetamine isomers have different effects on release of DA from nerve endings. It is possible that L: -amphetamine may have unique actions on the DA transporter, which is required for the effects of amphetamine on DA release from nerve terminals.

Amphetamines↗

Comparative Bioavailability of Trimodal (CTx-1301) Versus Bimodal Dexmethylphenidate Modified-Release Formulations in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized, Single-Dose, Crossover Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a chronic neurodevelopmental disorder that often requires sustained symptom control throughout the day. Although bimodal extended-release dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH XR) formulations provide initial and intermediate drug release, they may not consistently maintain therapeutic exposure into the late afternoon and evening. Trimodal formulations with an additional delayed release component may extend drug exposure later in the day, although this remains to be established. To explore differences in pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles between trimodal (CTx-1301) and bimodal delivery of d-MPH XR, a comparative bioavailability study was conducted at the highest and lowest doses for both formulations. METHODS: In this randomized, 4-period, crossover study, adults with ADHD received single doses of CTx-1301 (50 mg and 6.25 mg) and d-MPH XR (40 mg and 5 mg). Comparative bioavailability was assessed through adjusted geometric mean ratios for exposure parameters (maximum observed plasma concentration [Cmax], area under plasma concentration-time curve to last measurable concentration [AUClast] and extrapolated to infinity [AUC0-inf]), with a prespecified bioequivalence range of 0.80 to 1.25. Secondary endpoints included partial AUCs and safety assessments. RESULTS: The study population (N&#xa0;=&#xa0;45) was predominantly male (88.9%) and White (55.6%), with mean age of 29.6&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;8.01 years. Adjusted geometric mean ratios comparing the primary exposure parameters (Cmax, AUClast, and AUC0-inf) for CTx-1301 versus d-MPH XR were within the bioequivalence range (0.80-1.25) at both the high and low doses. The CTx-1301-to-d-MPH XR partial AUC ratios were within the bioequivalence range from 0 to 9 hours post-dose. At later intervals (AUC9-12 and AUC12-16), adjusted geometric mean ratios exceeded the upper bioequivalence threshold, consistent with the expected contribution of the third medication release component. Dose proportionality was observed between the two CTx-1301 doses and two d-MPH XR formulations. CTx-1301 was generally well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse events included tachycardia, insomnia, headache, nausea, and euphoric mood. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was numerically lower with CTx-1301 than with d-MPH XR; however, no statistical analysis was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Key exposure parameters including Cmax, AUClast, and AUC0-inf for trimodal CTx-1301 were statistically bioequivalent to bimodal d-MPH XR. Interval&#x2011;specific PK analyses demonstrated higher exposure with CTx&#x2011;1301 during later post-dose intervals (9-16 h), consistent with the formulation's third release component. However, the clinical relevance of these PK differences requires further evaluation. CTx-1301 demonstrated dose proportionality and was well tolerated at high and low doses. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04138498; 19 September 2019.

Humans↗

Efficacy and safety of dexmethylphenidate extended-release capsules in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, randomized, fixed-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated efficacy of extended-release dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH-ER) in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: Randomized adults with ADHD (n=221) received once-daily d-MPH-ER 20 mg, 30 mg, or 40 mg or placebo for 5 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline to final visit in DSM-IV ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) total score. Secondary efficacy parameters included the proportion of patients with improvement>or=30% in ADHD-RS total score and final scores on Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. RESULTS: Of 218 evaluable patients, 184 completed the study. All d-MPH-ER doses were significantly superior to placebo in improving ADHD-RS total scores. Placebo scores improved by 7.9; d-MPH-ER, 20 mg, improved by 13.7 (p=.006); d-MPH-ER, 30 mg, improved by 13.4 (p=.012); and d-MPH-ER, 40 mg, improved by 16.9 (p<.001). Overall distribution of CGI-I ratings at final visit was significantly better with each d-MPH-ER dosage than with placebo. There were no unexpected safety or tolerability concerns, based on experience with racemic methylphenidate (MPH) in adults and dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH) in children. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily d-MPH-ER at 20 mg, 30 mg, or 40 mg is a safe and effective treatment for adults with ADHD.

Adult↗

Neurobehavioral effects of racemic threo-methylphenidate and its D and L enantiomers in rats.

D,L-methylphenidate (Ritalin) is used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children. The therapeutic effect is predominantly due to the d enantiomer. Dexmethylphenidate (D-MPH; Focalin) was therefore developed for its better therapeutic index. The present study determined and compared the acute behavioral toxicity of D,L-MPH, D-MPH and L-MPH in rats after oral dosing. Comprehensive functional observational battery (FOB) evaluations and rota-rod tests were performed 30, 60 and 120 min after dosing. Ten rats/sex/dose were administered a single dose of vehicle, 2, 20, 100 mg/kg D,L-MPH and 1, 10, 50 mg/kg D-MPH or 1, 100, 500 mg/kg L-MPH. There was no mortality. Certain FOB evaluations were statistically significant from vehicle control at any of the time points with most occurring at 60 and 120 min in the high D,L-MPH dose. These included increases in rearing, difficulty in removal from box, arousal, click, tail-pinch and decreases in hind-limb splay distance, hind-limb grip strength and handling reactivity. Behavioral responses were also present at the mid-dose D,L-MPH and high dose D- and L-MPH. Responses in female were significantly different from males in D,L- and L-MPH groups suggesting a sex difference in sensitivity. In the rota-rod test, mean latency to remain on the rod was significantly less for males compared to control given high dose D-MPH and D,L-MPH. In females, latency times were significantly less for high doses of all three compounds. In summary, fewer significant FOBs were seen with D- and L-MPH compared to equimolar doses of D,L-MPH. L-MPH was the least potent in producing FOBs. These results were supported by rota-rod studies.

Animals↗

D-Methylphenidate is non-genotoxic in in vitro and in vivo assays.

D-Methylphenidate (dexmethylphenidate; D-MPH) and its racemate D,L-methylphenidate (D,L-MPH) are currently prescribed for the chronic treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children. Studies have shown that D-MPH is the pharmacologically active enantiomer for ADHD and is therefore the preferred drug for the treatment of ADHD symptoms. Although studies on the mutagenicity of D,L-MPH have been conducted, similar data for D-MPH are lacking. Therefore, D-MPH was evaluated in the bacterial reverse mutation and mouse lymphoma assays with and without S9 and in a bone marrow micronucleus test in male and female CD-1 mice. As a comparison, the L-enantiomer and racemate were also included in the assessments. While MPH-associated toxicity was observed in the mammalian tests, none of the three compounds tested induced mutagenic or clastogenic effects. Our present results along with published epidemiological data from patient populations are consistent with the conclusion that D-MPH and D,L-MPH do not present a carcinogenic risk to humans.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗

Efficacy and duration of effect of extended-release dexmethylphenidate versus placebo in schoolchildren with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess changes in symptomatology of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with extended-release dexmethylphenidate (d-MPHER) versus placebo in a laboratory classroom setting. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study randomized 54 children 6-12 years of age, stabilized on methylphenidate 20-40 mg/day. Patients participated in a practice day, then received 5 days of treatment with d-MPH-ER 20 mg/day or placebo. After a 1-day wash-out, they returned to the classroom and received 1 dose of their assigned treatment. Evaluations occurred predose and at postdose hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12. Children were then crossed over to the alternate treatment, using identical protocol. Primary efficacy variable was the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham rating scale (SKAMP)-Combined scores, and primary analysis time point was 1 hour postdose; secondary efficacy variables over 12 hours included SKAMP-Attention and -Deportment scores and written math test results. Safety was assessed by adverse event (AE) recording following each period. Vital signs were recorded at each visit; laboratory tests were conducted at screening and final visit. RESULTS: D-MPH-ER 20 mg/day showed a significant advantage over placebo as early as 1 hour postdose on SKAMP-Combined scores (p < 0.001). When analyzing the entire sample of 54 children, d-MPH-ER maintained significant superiority over placebo from hours 1 through 12 (p-values ranged from < 0.001 to 0.046). D-MPH-ER was well tolerated, with no severe AEs reported. CONCLUSIONS: D-MPH-ER is safe and effective and improves classroom attention, deportment, and performance in children with ADHD.

Aptitude Tests↗

A comprehensive in vitro screening of d-, l-, and dl-threo-methylphenidate: an exploratory study.

dl-Methylphenidate (MPH) has been widely used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) for the last half century. It had been exclusively available in the racemic form, i.e., a 50:50 mixture of d- and l-isomers. However, a single enantiomer formulation, d-MPH (dexmethylphenidate), became available for general clinical use in 2002. For this reason, the intrinsic pharmacological differences in the effects of d- and l-MPH have recently come under intense investigation. The primary therapeutic effects of MPH are generally recognized to reside in the d-isomer. The present investigation provides quantitative values for a broad range of receptor-level interactions of the individual MPH isomers to better characterize the distinction between dl-MPH versus d-MPH versus l-MPH as it relates to binding affinity at sites associated with relevant central nervous system (CNS) pharmacology, as well as peripheral physiology. Overall, there were few differences in binding affinities between d-MPH and the racemate whereas there were more apparent differences between d-MPH and l-MPH. d-MPH exhibited prominent affinity at the norepinephrine transporter (NET) site, even exceeding such affinity at the dopamine transporter (DAT). These results further demonstrate that affinity for catecholaminergic sites largely resides in the d-MPH isomer. Although binding affinity was not demonstrable at the serotonin (5-HT) transporter site (SERT), novel findings of the study included affinity for the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2B receptor sites for both d- and l-MPH, with d-MPH exerting by far the most predominant effects at these sites. Thus, the emerging data of favorable therapeutic effects of ADHD treatment with d-MPH (and dl-MPH) may be underpinned by affinity and potential pharmacologic effects at NET and DAT sites, as well as sites relevant to serotonergic neurotransmission that may modulate mood, cognition, and motor behavior. However, the present exploratory studies reflect receptor binding affinities only. The specific pharmacological activities (i.e., agonism vs. antagonism) of these compounds await further exploration.

Animals↗

Efficacy and safety of dexmethylphenidate extended-release capsules in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of dexmethylphenidate extended release (d-MPH-ER) was compared to placebo in pediatric patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, two-phase study included 97 patients (ages 6-17 years) with DSM-IV-defined ADHD. The study was carried out between 2001 and 2003. After a 2-week evaluation phase, patients were randomized to d-MPH-ER or placebo for 7 weeks. Flexible d-MPH-ER dosing (30 mg/day) was permitted for 5 weeks, then patients remained on their optimal dose during the last 2 study weeks. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to final rating in Conners ADHD/DSM-IV Scale-Teacher version (CADS-T) total subscale score. Secondary efficacy variables included changes from baseline to final visit in CADS-T Inattentive and Hyperactive-Impulsive subscale scores, CADS-P DSM-IV total subscale score and Inattentive and Hyperactive-Impulsive subscale scores, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) and CGI-Severity (CGI-S) scale scores, and Child Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 scores. RESULTS: d-MPH-ER improved CADS-T total scores significantly compared with placebo (p <.001), and 67.3% of d-MPH-ER patients were rated much improved or very much improved on CGI-I at final visit versus 13.3% of placebo patients (p <.001). More patients taking d-MPH-ER (49.1%) than placebo (25.5%) spontaneously reported adverse events suspected as drug related. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily d-MPH-ER was more effective than placebo in the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents.

Adolescent↗