Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Dexmedetomidine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Evaluation of the sedative and cardiorespiratory effects of dexmedetomidine, dexmedetomidine-butorphanol, and dexmedetomidine-ketamine in cats.

OBJECTIVE: To determine sedative and cardiorespiratory effects of dexmedetomidine alone and in combination with butorphanol or ketamine in cats. DESIGN: Randomized crossover study. ANIMALS: 6 healthy adult cats. PROCEDURES: Cats were given dexmedetomidine alone (10 microg/kg [4.5 mg/lb], IM), a combination of dexmedetomidine (10 microg/kg, IM) and butorphanol (0.2 mg/kg [0.09 mg/lb], IM), or a combination of dexmedetomidine (10 microg/kg, IM) and ketamine (5 mg/kg [2.3 mg/lb], IM). Treatments were administered in random order, with > or = 1 week between treatments. Physiologic variables were assessed before and after drug administration. Time to lateral recumbency, duration of lateral recumbency, time to sternal recumbency, time to recovery from sedation, and subjective evaluation of sedation, muscle relaxation, and auditory response were assessed. RESULTS: Each treatment resulted in adequate sedation; time to lateral recumbency, duration of lateral recumbency, and time to recovery from sedation were similar among treatments. Time to sternal recumbency was significantly greater after administration of dexmedetomidine-ketamine. Heart rate decreased significantly after each treatment; however, the decrease was more pronounced after administration of dexmedetomidine-butorphanol, compared with that following the other treatments. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements decreased significantly from baseline with all treatments; 50 minutes after drug administration, mean blood pressure differed significantly from baseline only when cats received dexmedetomidine and butorphanol. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggested that in cats, administration of dexmedetomidine combined with butorphanol or ketamine resulted in more adequate sedation, without clinically important cardiovascular effects, than was achieved with dexmedetomidine alone.

Anesthetics, Dissociative↗
PubMed2004

Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: part I: crossover comparison of the respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist used for short-term sedation of mechanically ventilated patients, has minimal effect on ventilation. METHODS: This study compared the respiratory effect of dexmedetomidine to that of remifentanil. The authors measured and compared respiratory responses of six healthy male volunteers during (1) a stepwise target-controlled infusion of remifentanil, (2) a stepwise target-controlled infusion of dexmedetomidine, and (3) a pseudonatural sleep session. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, remifentanil infusions resulted in respiratory depression as evidenced by a decrease in respiratory rate and minute ventilation, respiratory acidosis, and apnea episodes resulting in desaturations. Remifentanil disturbed the natural pattern of breathing and flattened the distribution of ventilatory timing (inspiratory time/ventilatory cycle time). The respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine markedly contrasted with those of remifentanil. When compared with baseline, during dexmedetomidine infusions, the respiratory rate significantly increased, and the overall apnea/hypopnea index significantly decreased. The distribution of inspiratory time/ventilatory cycle time showed an increased peak. In addition, dexmedetomidine seemed to mimic some aspect of natural sleep. While the subjects were breathing a 5% CO2 mixture, hypercapnic arousal phenomena (documented by the Bispectral Index, the electroencephalogram, and sudden increase in the minute ventilation) were observed during dexmedetomidine infusions. Similar phenomena during natural sleep have been reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with remifentanil, dexmedetomidine infusions (1) did not result in clinically significant respiratory depression, (2) decreased rather than increased the apnea/hypopnea index, and (3) exhibited some similarity with natural sleep.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam sedation and antagonism of dexmedetomidine with atipamezole.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 agonist, as an intravenous sedative drug and the effects of atipamezole, an alpha-2 antagonist, on recovery. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind study with three parallel groups. An open dose-finding study preceded it to optimize the atipamezole dose. SETTING: Outpatient operating room at the gynecologic and obstetric university hospital in Helsinki, Finland. PATIENTS: Seventy-two healthy women scheduled for legal termination of pregnancy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned to one of three groups of 24 patients each to receive either dexmedetomidine 2 micrograms/kg and atipamezole 50 micrograms/kg; dexmetomidine 2 micrograms/kg and saline; or midazolam 0.15 mg/kg and saline. In addition to paracervical block, each patient received two different study drugs: study drug 1 was a sedative agent (either dexmedetomidine or midazolam), administered before the procedure. If the sedation was not deep enough and the patient reacted to the procedure, a low dose of propofol was administered. Study drug 2 was a reversing agent or a placebo, administered following the procedure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean time to regain consciousness was shorter in the dexmedetomidine-atipamezole and the dexmedetomidine-saline groups compared with the midazolam group. Postoperative sedation, tested both by subjective and objective assessments, decreased more quickly in the dexmedetomidine-atipamezole group compared with the dexmedetomidine-saline and the midazolam groups. CONCLUSION: Atipamezole is an effective antagonist for reversing psychomotor impairment following dexmedetomidine sedation.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2004

Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: Part II: Crossover comparison of the analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist used for short-term sedation of mechanically ventilated patients. The analgesic profile of dexmedetomidine has not been fully characterized in humans. METHODS: This study was designed to compare the analgesic responses of six healthy male volunteers during stepwise target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine. A computer-controlled thermode was used to deliver painful heat stimuli to the volar side of the forearms of the subjects. Six sequential 5-s stimuli (ranging from 41 degrees to 50 degrees C) were delivered in random order. The recorded visual analog scale was used to fit an Emax model. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, remifentanil infusions resulted in a right shift of the sigmoid curve (increased T50, the temperature producing a visual analog scale score of 50% of the maximal effect, from 46.1 degrees C at baseline to 48.4 degrees and 49.1 degrees C during remifentanil infusions) without a change of the steepness of the curve (identical Hill coefficients gamma during baseline and remifentanil). Compared to baseline, dexmedetomidine infusions resulted in both a right shift of the sigmoid curve (increased T50 to 47.2 degrees C) and a decrease in the steepness of the curve (decreased gamma from 3.24 during baseline and remifentanil infusions to 2.45 during dexmedetomidine infusions). There was no difference in the pain responses between baseline and after recovery from remifentanil infusions (identical T50 and gamma). CONCLUSION: As expected, dexmedetomidine is not as effective an analgesic as the opioid remifentanil. The difference in the quality of the analgesia with remifentanil may be a reflection of a different mechanism of action or a consequence of the sedative effect of dexmedetomidine.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Dexmedetomidine as intramuscular premedication for day-case cataract surgery. A comparative study of dexmedetomidine, midazolam and placebo.

The effects of dexmedetomidine 1.0 microgram.kg-1, midazolam 20 micrograms.kg-1 and saline placebo were assessed in a double-blind, randomised study in 90 patients undergoing day-case cataract surgery under regional anaesthesia. The trial drug was injected into the deltoid muscle 45 min before the peri-ocular block. Dexmedetomidine 1.0 microgram.kg-1 decreased intra-ocular pressure before, during and after surgery. The maximum reduction in mean (SD) intra-ocular pressure occurred in the dexmedetomine group just before discharge from hospital (17.7 (2.8) mmHg to 11.5 (2.9) mmHg) (p < 0.001 compared with midazolam and placebo). In contrast, midazolam did not differ from saline placebo. Dexmedetomidine and midazolam produced a similar sedative effect of short duration. Dexmedetomidine induced a moderate decrease in blood pressure (p < 0.001 compared with placebo) and a slight but statistically significant decrease in heart rate throughout the study period (p < 0.001 compared with placebo). Dexmedetomidine 1.0 microgram.kg-1 intramuscularly, effectively reduced intra-ocular pressure and produced short-acting sedation with marginal cardiovascular effects; it may be a useful premedicant drug for elderly patients undergoing day-case cataract surgery under regional anaesthesia.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed2005

Dexmedetomidine decreases the convulsive potency of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in rats: involvement of alpha2-adrenoceptor for controlling convulsions.

Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, is used in combination with local anesthetics for sedation and analgesia. We tested the hypothesis that dexmedetomidine used for sedation alters the convulsive potency of racemic bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in awake, spontaneously breathing rats. In the first experiments, male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into six groups: bupivacaine with no dexmedetomidine (bupivacaine control; BC), bupivacaine with small-dose dexmedetomidine (BS), bupivacaine with large-dose dexmedetomidine (BL), levobupivacaine with no dexmedetomidine (levobupivacaine control; LC), levobupivacaine with small-dose dexmedetomidine (LS), and levobupivacaine with large-dose dexmedetomidine (LL) (n = 10 for each group). Continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine (Groups BC and LC, 0 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1); Groups BS and LS, 3.6 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1); and Groups BL and LL, 10.8 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) was started after bolus injection (Groups BC and LC, 0 microg/kg; Groups BS and LS, 0.5 microg/kg; and Groups BL and LL, 1.5 microg/kg). Fifteen minutes after the start of the dexmedetomidine infusion, continuous infusion of bupivacaine (Groups BC, BS, and BL) or levobupivacaine (Groups LC, LS, and LL) at 1 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) was started and continued until tonic/clonic convulsions occurred. Dexmedetomidine achieved significantly different sedation levels both in Groups BC, BS, and BL and in Groups LC, LS, and LL (P < 0.05). Convulsive doses of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine were significantly larger in Groups BL and LL than in Groups BC and LC, respectively (P < 0.01 for both). Concentrations of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in plasma and in brain at the onset of convulsions were also larger in Groups BL and LL than in Groups BC and LC (P < 0.01 for both). In the second experiment, yohimbine (1 mg/kg) administered 10 min before and 5 min after the start of dexmedetomidine infusion completely reversed the sedative effect of dexmedetomidine (bolus 1.5 microg/kg, followed by 10.8 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1)). Convulsive doses and plasma and brain concentrations of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine at the onset of convulsions in rats receiving yohimbine and dexmedetomidine were significantly smaller than in those receiving only dexmedetomidine (P < 0.05 for all) and were similar to those without dexmedetomidine or yohimbine. We conclude that dexmedetomidine used for sedation decreases the convulsive potency of both bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in rats. Alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonism may be involved in this anticonvulsant potency.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Dexmedetomidine enhances analgesic action of nitrous oxide: mechanisms of action.

BACKGROUND: Nitrous oxide and dexmedetomidine are thought to mediate analgesia (antinociception in a noncommunicative organism) via alpha 2B- and alpha 2A-adrenergic receptor subtypes within the spinal cord, respectively. Nitrous oxide and dexmedetomidine exert diametrically opposite effects on neuronal activity within the locus ceruleus, a pivotal site for modulation of analgesia. Because of these differences, the authors explored whether the two analgesics in combination would provide satisfactory analgesia. METHODS: The analgesic effects of nitrous oxide and dexmedetomidine given both intraperitoneally and intrathecally were evaluated using the tail-flick latency test in rats. For investigation of the interaction, rats were pretreated with dexmedetomidine, either intraperitoneally or intrathecally, immediately before nitrous oxide exposure such that peak antinociceptive effects of each drug coincided. For assessment of the effect on tolerance, dexmedetomidine was administered as tolerance to nitrous oxide developed. Expression of c-Fos was used to assess neuronal activity in the locus ceruleus. RESULTS: Nitrous oxide and dexmedetomidine increased tail-flick latency with an ED50 (mean +/- SEM) of 55.0 +/- 2.2% atm for nitrous oxide, 27.6 +/- 5.1 for microg/kg intraperitoneal dexmedetomidine, and 2.9 +/- 0.1 microg for intrathecal dexmedetomidine. Combinations of systemically administered dexmedetomidine and nitrous oxide produced an additive analgesic interaction; however, neuraxially administered dexmedetomidine interacted synergistically with nitrous oxide. Tolerance to nitrous oxide was reversed by coadministration of dexmedetomidine. Prazosin, the alpha 1-/alpha 2B-adrenoceptor antagonist, attenuated the analgesic effect of nitrous oxide and prevented dexmedetomidine-induced reversal of tolerance to nitrous oxide. Nitrous oxide-induced increase of neuronal activity in the locus ceruleus was reversed by dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSION: The synergistic analgesic interaction between nitrous oxide and dexmedetomidine within the spinal cord is obscured by a supraspinal antagonism when dexmedetomidine is administered systemically in the pretolerant state. After tolerance to nitrous oxide develops, supraspinal functional antagonism no longer obtains exposing the synergistic action at the level of the spinal cord, which expresses itself as a reversal of the tolerant state. The authors speculate that the addition of dexmedetomidine to nitrous oxide is likely to provide enhanced and more durable analgesia in settings in which nitrous oxide is currently used alone (e.g., labor and dental surgery).

Analgesics↗
PubMed1994

Oral dexmedetomidine preserves baroreceptor function and decreases anesthetic requirements of halothane-anesthetized dogs.

BACKGROUND: The alpha 2-adrenergic agonist, dexmedetomidine, alters hemodynamics by diminishing sympathetic and/or augmenting parasympathetic neurogenic tone to the heart and peripheral vasculature. However, the specific actions of dexmedetomidine on baroreceptor function are unknown. The purpose of the current investigation was to determine baroreceptor function during an anesthetic state produced by halothane and a similar anesthetic state produced by halothane after dexmedetomidine pretreatment. METHODS: Dogs were instrumented for measurement of arterial and left ventricular pressures, coronary blood flow velocity, segment shortening and cardiac output. Five experimental conditions were studied in the same dogs (n = 8). Measurements of baroreceptor sensitivity (via abrupt decreases and increases in arterial pressure resulting in changes in the cardiac cycle) and hemodynamics were made in the conscious state in dogs in conditions 1 and 2 before and after 25 and 50 micrograms.kg-1 of oral dexmedetomidine, respectively. Dogs in conditions 3 and 4 received the same doses of dexmedetomidine and were then anesthetized with halothane. Baroreceptor sensitivity was determined after 60 min of halothane anesthesia. For comparison, dogs in condition 5 had baroreceptor sensitivity measured after 60 min of halothane anesthesia in the absence of dexmedetomidine. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine decreased heart rate, rate-pressure product, rate of increase of left ventricular pressure at 50 mmHg, cardiac output and percent segment shortening. Diastolic coronary vascular resistance and systemic vascular resistance were increased with both oral doses. In addition, diastolic coronary blood flow velocity and stroke volume were significantly reduced by the high dose of dexmedetomidine. Anesthesia with halothane increased heart rate and decreased mean arterial pressure, left ventricular systolic pressure, rate of increase of left ventricular pressure at 50 mmHg, stroke volume and segment shortening. Administration of dexmedetomidine before halothane anesthesia in dogs pretreated with dexmedetomidine resulted in small increases in heart rate and decreases mean arterial pressure and left ventricular systolic pressure. Both doses of dexmedetomidine demonstrated anesthetic-sparing effects. The end-tidal concentration of halothane to maintain dogs unconscious and unresponsive was reduced by 30% and 40% (1.03 +/- 0.08% to 0.67 +/- 0.09% and to 0.58 +/- 0.06% end-tidal, respectively) at 25 and 50 micrograms.kg-1, respectively. Baroreceptor sensitivity was profoundly depressed by halothane alone. Dexmedetomidine did not significantly change the slope of the baroreflex response when compared with conscious control measurements. After pretreatment with dexmedetomidine, the reduction in halothane concentration required for a comparable level of anesthesia resulted in significant preservation of baroreceptor sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that dexmedetomidine alone does not alter baroreflex sensitivity. In addition, possibly through an anesthetic-sparing action, dexmedetomidine preserves baroreflex responses during halothane anesthesia. Such a preservation of the baroreceptor reflex by dexmedetomidine might provide an important mechanism for maintenance of cardiovascular stability by retaining buffer reflexes during general anesthesia.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Sympatholytic and minimum anesthetic concentration-sparing responses are preserved in rats rendered tolerant to the hypnotic and analgesic action of dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist.

BACKGROUND: The development of tolerance to the sympatholytic and anesthetic-reducing effects of alpha(2) agonists after prolonged administration of dexmedetomidine and how the number of available alpha(2) adrenoceptors affects these dexmedetomidine-induced responses was studied. METHODS: The sympatholytic action of acute and chronic (3 and 10 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 for 7 days) dexmedetomidine, was assessed by the decrease in norepinephrine turnover in the locus coeruleus and hippocampus. The anesthetic-reducing effect of chronic (7 days) dexmedetomidine (5 and 10 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) was studied by determining the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) for halothane that prevented rats from responding to a supramaximal noxious stimulus of dexmedetomidine (10 or 30 micrograms.kg-1), doses in the steep part of the dose-response curve. The receptor reserve for the norepinephrine turnover and anesthetic-sparing responses to dexmedetomidine was delineated with 0.3-1.0 mg.kg-1 N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline, an irreversible alkylating agent. RESULTS: After chronic administration of dexmedetomidine at both doses, acute dexmedetomidine significantly decreased norepinephrine turnover in the hippocampus and locus coeruleus. The baseline minimum anesthetic concentration (MAC) and the MAC-sparing effect to acutely administered dexmedetomidine were preserved after chronic dexmedetomidine treatment. In the N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline experiments, the dexmedetomidine-induced norepinephrine turnover effect required less than 20% and greater than 4% alpha(2) adrenoceptor availability in the locus coeruleus and the dexmedetomidine induced MAC-sparing effect required less than 40% and greater than 20% alpha(2) adrenoceptor availability in the locus coeruleus. CONCLUSION: Tolerance does not develop for either the sympatholytic or MAC-sparing actions of dexmedetomidine, although it is present for the hypnotic response. The durable quality of the sympatholytic and MAC-sparing responses to dexmedetomidine after chronic treatment is explained by a comparatively larger receptor reserve than is needed for the hypnotic and analgesic responses, which are blunted by the same drug treatment regimen.

Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2004

Dexmedetomidine overdose in the perioperative setting.

OBJECTIVE: To report 3 cases of accidental dexmedetomidine overdose in the perioperative setting and review the pathophysiology of alpha2-agonist overdose. case summaries: Three patients accidentally received overdoses of dexmedetomidine, one intraoperatively (192 microg over 20 min) and 2 postoperatively (4 and 2 rather than 0.4 and 0.2 microg/kg/h; 0.5 microg/kg/min rather than 0.5 microg/kg/h). Hemodynamic parameters remained stable for all 3 patients. The most notable sign was oversedation diagnosed either clinically or using a bispectral index monitor; Naranjo criteria suggest possible or probable association of the reactions with dexmedetomidine. In all 3 cases, oversedation resolved within one hour of drug discontinuation. There were no other sequelae, and the remainder of each patient's hospital course was unremarkable. DISCUSSION: As of this writing, dexmedetomidine dosing in excess of the label recommendation has been reported, but accidental dexmedetomidine overdose in clinical practice has not been described. Excessive levels of sedation were the only significant finding in all 3 patients. Dexmedetomidine's short redistribution half-life of 6 minutes should lead to rapid resolution of oversedation induced by overdoses if the overall duration of infusion is short (< or =8 h). While the patients reported here were hemodynamically stable, dexmedetomidine may engender significant hemodynamic changes either because of sympatholysis at normal doses or vasoconstriction at higher than recommended doses. The absence of a significant hypertensive response to high dexmedetomidine concentrations suggests that dexmedetomidine-induced hypertension may be multifactorial, not simply related to plasma drug concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners presented with dexmedetomidine overdose should be prepared to manage oversedation. While hemodynamic alterations may be seen with dexmedetomidine use, hypertension from high dexmedetomidine plasma concentrations is not a consistent response. Practitioners using dexmedetomidine should carefully note that dosing for this agent is described by the manufacturer in microg/kg/h, not microg/kg/min.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed1997

Postoperative pharmacokinetics and sympatholytic effects of dexmedetomidine.

UNLABELLED: Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist with centrally mediated sympatholytic, sedative, and analgesic effects. This study evaluated: 1) pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in surgical patients; 2) precision of a computer-controlled infusion protocol (CCIP) for dexmedetomidine during the immediate postoperative period; and 3) dexmedetomidine's sympatholytic effects during that period. Dexmedetomidine was infused postoperatively by CCIP for 60 min to eight women, targeting a plasma concentration (Cp) of 600 pg/mL. Before, during, and after infusion, blood was sampled to determine plasma concentrations of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dexmedetomidine, and CSF was sampled to determine dexmedetomidine concentrations (C[CSF]). Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were measured continuously from 5 min before until 3 h after the end of infusion. During the infusion, Cp values generally exceeded the target value: median percent error averaged 21% and ranged from -2% to 74%; median absolute percent error averaged 23% and ranged from 4% to 74%. After infusion, C(CSF) was 4% +/- 1% of Cp. Because C(CSF) barely exceeded the assay's limit of quantitation, CSF pharmacokinetics were not determined. During the infusion, norepinephrine decreased from 2.1 +/- 0.8 to 0.7 +/- 0.3 nmol/L; epinephrine decreased from 0.7 +/- 0.5 to 0.2 +/- 0.2 nmol/L; heart rate decreased from 76 +/- 15 to 64 +/- 11 bpm; and systolic blood pressure decreased from 158 +/- 23 to 140 +/- 23 mm Hg. We conclude that infusion of dexmedetomidine by CCIP using published pharmacokinetic parameters overshoots target dexmedetomidine concentrations during the early postoperative period. Hemodynamic and catecholamine results suggest that dexmedetomidine attenuates sympathetic activity during the immediate postoperative period. IMPLICATIONS: We studied the pharmacokinetic and sympatholytic effects of dexmedetomidine during the immediate postoperative period and found that during this period, the published pharmacokinetic data slightly overshoot target plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations. We also found that heart rate, blood pressure, and plasma catecholamine concentrations decrease during dexmedetomidine infusion.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed1999

The effects of dexmedetomidine on neuromuscular blockade in human volunteers.

UNLABELLED: The neuromuscular effects of dexmedetomidine in humans are unknown. We evaluated the effect of dexmedetomidine on neuromuscular block and hemodynamics during propofol/alfentanil anesthesia. During propofol/alfentanil anesthesia, the rocuronium infusion rate was adjusted in 10 volunteers to maintain a stable first response (T1) in the train-of-four sequence at 50% +/- 3% of the pre-rocuronium value. Dexmedetomidine was then administered by computer-controlled infusion, targeting a plasma dexmedetomidine concentration of 0.6 ng/mL for 45 min. The evoked mechanical responses of the adductor pollicis responses (T1 response and T4/T1 ratio), systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), and transmitted light through a fingertip were measured during the dexmedetomidine infusion and compared with predexmedetomidine values using repeated-measures analysis of variance and Dunnett's test. Plasma dexmedetomidine levels ranged from 0.68 to 1.24 ng/mL. T1 values decreased during the infusion, from 51% +/- 2% to 44% +/- 9% (P < 0.0001). T4/T1 values did not change during the infusion. Plasma rocuronium concentrations increased during the infusion (P = 0.02). Dexmedetomidine increased SBP (P < 0.001) and decreased HR (P < 0.001) (5-min median values) during the infusion compared with values before the infusion. Dexmedetomidine increased the transmitted light through the fingertip by up to 41% +/- 8% during the dexmedetomidine infusion (P < 0.001).We demonstrated that dexmedetomidine (0.98 +/- 0.01 microg/kg) increased the plasma rocuronium concentration, decreased T1, increased SBP, and decreased finger blood flow during propofol/alfentanil anesthesia. We conclude that dexmedetomidine-induced vasoconstriction may alter the pharmacokinetics of rocuronium. IMPLICATIONS: We studied the effect of an alpha2-agonist (dexmedetomidine) on rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block during propofol/alfentanil anesthesia. We found that the rocuronium concentration increased and the T1 response decreased during the dexmedetomidine administration. Although these effects were statistically significant, it is unlikely that they are of clinical significance.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed1993

Dexmedetomidine alters the hemodynamic effects of desflurane and isoflurane in chronically instrumented dogs.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that desflurane and isoflurane produce similar hemodynamic actions. This investigation examined the cardiovascular effects of desflurane and isoflurane in the presence or absence of dexmedetomidine, a highly selective alpha 2-adrenergic agonist that may be clinically useful as a premedicant or anesthetic adjuvant. METHODS: Four groups, comprising 40 experiments, were performed using ten dogs that were chronically instrumented for measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressure, the maximum rate of increase of left ventricular pressure (dP/dtmax), diastolic coronary blood flow velocity, cardiac output, and subendocardial segment length. On separate experimental days, systemic and coronary hemodynamics were recorded, and plasma concentrations of catecholamines were measured with or without oral dexmedetomidine pretreatment (30 micrograms/kg) in the conscious state and after 15 min of equilibration at 1.0, 1.3, and 1.6 end-tidal MAC desflurane or isoflurane in a random fashion. RESULTS: In conscious dogs, dexmedetomidine significantly decreased heart rate, cardiac output, percent segment shortening (%SS), left ventricular dp/dtmax, myocardial oxygen consumption (as estimated by the pressure-work index), and plasma norepinephrine concentration. Concomitant increases in systemic and diastolic coronary vascular resistance were observed. Pretreatment with dexmedetomidine decreased peak increases in heart rate during desflurane and isoflurane anesthesia. Mean arterial pressure was reduced less by desflurane than by isoflurane in the absence of dexmedetomidine. This difference was abolished in dogs pretreated with dexmedetomidine. Desflurane, but not isoflurane, decreased cardiac output in dexmedetomidine-pretreated dogs when compared with untreated dogs. Concomitantly, systemic vascular resistance was greater in desflurane- versus isoflurane-anesthetized dogs pretreated with dexmedetomidine. No differences in myocardial contractility, as assessed by left ventricular dP/dtmax and %SS, were observed between desflurane and isoflurane groups in the absence or presence of dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the cardiovascular actions of desflurane or isoflurane are similar in the absence or presence of dexmedetomidine; however, some differences between anesthetic groups were noted. In the presence of dexmedetomidine, systemic vascular resistance during desflurane anesthesia was higher when compared with that during isoflurane anesthesia, indicating that desflurane produces less pronounced direct effects on peripheral vascular tone. The concomitant greater reductions in cardiac output are consistent with greater impedance to left ventricular outflow in desflurane-anesthetized dogs pretreated with dexmedetomidine, because no differences in contractile function were observed between volatile anesthetics. In contrast, cardiac output during isoflurane anesthesia after pretreatment with oral dexmedetomidine is better maintained secondary to the peripheral vasodilator actions of this agent.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed1996

Dexmedetomidine injection into the locus ceruleus produces antinociception.

BACKGROUND: Alpha(2)-Adrenergic agonists such as clonidine and dexmedetomidine are known to produce sedation and analgesia in humans. The sedative effect of these agents is thought to occur through supraspinal pathways, involving the locus ceruleus (LC) and its projections in rats. While the antinociceptive response to alpha(2) agonists, given intrathecally, is mediated predominantly in the spinal cord, other sites of action have not been systematically studied. The authors examined whether alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors in the LC mediate an antinociceptive effect. METHODS: For administration of different drugs into the LC, guide cannulas were placed with their tips in the LC in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Dexmedetomidine (3.5 micrograms/0.2 microliter) was microinjected into the LC through the cannula, or given systemically by intraperitoneal injecton (50 micrograms/kg). The antinociceptive effect of dexmedetomidine was measured using the tail-flick latency response. To determine the sites through which dexmedetomidine injection into the LC produces antinociception, the authors examined whether this response could be perturbed by the specific alpha(2)-adrenergic antagonists atipamezole and L659,066 and pertussis toxin administered either into the LC or intrathecally before injection of dexmedetomidine systemically or directly into the LC. To eliminate the possibility that drug administered in one site (LC or intrathecal) could reach the other site, the dispositional characteristics of radiolabeled dexmedetomidine (LC) or atipamezole (intrathecal) were studied. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine placed into the LC produces a dose-dependent increase in the tail-flick latency. This antinociceptive effect was blocked by pertussis toxin and by the alpha(2) antagonists atipamezole and L659,066 placed in the LC. Intrathecal administration of atipamezole and pertussis toxin also blocked the antinociceptive effect of dexmedetomidine placed in the LC. (3)H-dexmedetomidine introduced into the LC did not reach the spinal cord in pharmacologically active concentrations; also, intrathecally administered (3)H-atipamezole did not reach the LC in appreciable amounts. The systemic administration of dexmedetomidine produced an increase in tail-flick latency, and this effect was attenuated by the injection of atipamezole and L659,066 into the LC. CONCLUSIONS: Part of the mechanism by which dexmedetomidine produces an antinociceptive effect is by an action directly on the LC, demonstrated by these studies in which antinociception produced by injection of this drug into the LC can be blocked by specific alpha(2) antagonists injected into the LC. Furthermore, the action of dexmedetomidine in the LC in turn may result in an increase in activation of alpha(2) adrenoceptors in the spinal cord, because the antinociceptive effect of LC dexmedetomidine injection also can be blocked by intrathecal injection of antipamezole and pertussis toxin.

Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2001

Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in the intensive care unit: patient and clinician perceptions.

The alpha2 agonist dexmedetomidine is a new sedative and analgesic agent which is licensed in the USA for post-operative intensive care sedation. We compared dexmedetomidine with propofol in patients requiring sedation in intensive care. Twenty adult patients expected to require a minimum of 8 h artificial ventilation after surgery were randomized to receive sedation with either dexmedetomidine or propofol infusions. Additional analgesia, if required, was provided by an alfentanil infusion. Depth of sedation was monitored using both the Ramsay sedation score (RSS) and the bispectral index (BIS). Cardiovascular, respiratory, biochemical and haematological data were obtained. Patients' perceptions of their intensive care stay were assessed using the Hewitt questionnaire. Sedation was equivalent in the two groups [median (interquartile range): RSS, propofol group 5 (4-5), dexmedetomidine group 5 (4-6) (P=0.68); BIS, propofol group 53 (41-64), dexmedetomidine group 46 (36-58); P=0.32], but the propofol group received three times more alfentanil compared with patients sedated with dexmedetomidine [2.5 (2.2-2.9) mg h(-1) versus 0.8 (0.65-1.2) mg h(-1) (P=0.004)]. No differences were found in arterial pressures between the groups, but heart rate was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group [mean (SD) 75 (6) vs 90 (4) beats min(-1)]. Extubation times were similar and rapid with the use of both sedative agents [median (range) 28 (20-50) and 29 (15-50) min (P=0.63) respectively for the propofol and dexmedetomidine groups]. No adverse events related to the sedative infusions occurred in either group. Despite ventilation and intubation, patients sedated with dexmedetomidine could be easily roused to cooperate with procedures (e.g. physiotherapy, radiology) without showing irritation. From the clinician's and patient's perspectives, dexmedetomidine is a safe and acceptable sedative agent for those requiring intensive care. The rate pressure product is reduced in patients receiving dexmedetomidine, which may protect against myocardial ischaemia. Dexmedetomidine reduces the requirement for opioid analgesia.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed1995

Mechanisms of dexmedetomidine-induced cerebrovascular effects in canine in vivo experiments.

Dexmedetomidine decreases cerebral blood flow without significantly affecting cerebral oxygen consumption in anesthetized dogs. To assess the direct cerebrovascular effects of dexmedetomidine, we investigated the responses of vasomotor tone to topical application of dexmedetomidine to pial vessels in vivo, using a parietal cranial window. Forty-one dogs were anesthetized with pentobarbital. In 20 dogs, we topically applied six concentrations of dexmedetomidine solution (10(-8), 10(-7), 10(-6), 10(-5), 10(-4), 10(-3) M) and directly measured pial arterial and venous diameters. In 10 dogs, the inhibitory effects of pretreatment of pial vessels with 10(-5) M yohimbine were examined after the application of 10(-5) dexmedetomidine. In the remaining 11 dogs, the effects of 10(-3) M dexmedetomidine were evaluated in the presence of N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), glibenclamide, or propranolol. Dexmedetomidine significantly constricted pial arteries and veins in a concentration-dependent manner (10(-7) M to 10(-4) M; P < 0.05). Yohimbine blocked dexmedetomidine-induced constriction of pial vessels (both large and small arteries and large veins P < 0.0001; small veins P < 0.005). However, when the highest concentration of dexmedetomidine (10(-3) M) was administered under the window, pial vessel diameter was not significantly altered. In the presence of glibenclamide, 10(-7) and 10(-3) M dexmedetomidine induced a significant decrease in pial arterial diameter compared with 10(-7) and 10(-3) M dexmedetomidine solution alone, respectively (P < 0.05). L-NAME or propranolol did not affect the dexmedetomidine-induced constriction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1990

Dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha 2-agonist, does not potentiate the cardiorespiratory depression of alfentanil in the rat.

The authors examined the cardiovascular and respiratory effects of the highly selective alpha 2-adrenergic agonist dexmedetomidine, both alone and in combination with the synthetic opiate alfentanil. Spontaneously ventilating rats (n = 28) were pretreated with dexmedetomidine, 10 or 30 micrograms/kg; dexmedetomidine, 30 micrograms/kg in combination with the central-acting alpha 2-antagonist idazoxan, 10 mg/kg; or vehicle. Fifteen minutes later all rats received alfentanil, 500 micrograms/kg. Pretreatment with dexmedetomidine reduced heart rate in a dose-related fashion. Administration of alfentanil also caused a significant reduction in heart rate. However, following alfentanil, the dexmedetomidine-treated animals did not have significantly greater bradycardia than control animals. An increase in blood pressure was observed in those animals receiving the larger dose of dexmedetomidine, but this difference disappeared following injection of alfentanil. The addition of idazoxan to the pretreatment regimen prevented the changes seen with dexmedetomidine. Pretreatment with dexmedetomidine produced no significant changes in arterial pH or PCO2. In all groups, administration of alfentanil resulted in a decrease in arterial pH that ultimately became a mixed respiratory and metabolic acidosis. The acidosis promptly resolved following injection of naloxone (1 mg/kg). It appears that dexmedetomidine, at the doses given, has little or no effect on respiration. Dexmedetomidine decreases heart rate but does not add to bradycardia following alfentanil. There is a hypertensive effect seen at the higher dose of dexmedetomidine, but this effect disappears when the drug is given in conjunction with alfentanil. These data show that addition of the alpha 2-agonist dexmedetomidine will not worsen the cardiovascular and respiratory depression associated with high-dose opiates in the spontaneously ventilating rat.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗