Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DRAINAGE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

[Wound drainage with a continuous high vacuum drainage system and a drainage system with variable vacuum].

A study of 120 total hip replacements showed the advantages of the variable vacuum drainage system over the continuous high vacuum drainage system. Better wound healing, less severe hematomas and less occlusion of drains confirmed the higher effectiveness of secretion draining. With regard to hygienic aspects, and especially to wound infection, the continuous closed drainage system is an improvement of the intermittent closed drainage system.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Alternatives to percussion and postural drainage. A review of mucus clearance therapies: percussion and postural drainage, autogenic drainage, positive expiratory pressure, flutter valve, intrapulmonary percussive ventilation, and high-frequency chest compression with the ThAIRapy Vest.

The purpose of this article is to review published studies on the efficacy of old and new mucus clearance techniques and to develop recommendations for different groups of patients. Mucus clearance is a problem in cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, and many other pulmonary conditions. Percussion and postural drainage (P & PD) was the traditional method of facilitating mucus clearance, but the many hazards and contraindications along with the onerous nature and resultant poor patient compliance of this procedure have led to the development of alternative therapies. Research studies with cystic fibrosis patients support the efficacy of P & PD in patients who can tolerate it. However, equivalent sputum production can be accomplished with autogenic drainage, positive expiratory pressure, and Flutter valve therapy without the assistance of another caregiver, as long as the patient has the motivation, breath control, and neuromuscular function to perform these modalities. The Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation device and high-frequency chest compression with the ThAIRapy vest involve more elaborate and expensive equipment, yet these devices provide mucus clearance assistance to patients who lack the ability to perform the simpler techniques. Both mechanized modalities promote independence and self-care in the patient, and the effectiveness of both has been supported by the limited research published to date. Which alternative to recommend depends on the ability, motivation, preference, needs, and resources of each patient.

Cystic Fibrosis↗
PubMed2001

[A prospective randomized study of wound drainage versus non-drainage in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Drainage of the operative wound following total hip or knee replacement (THR, TKR) is usually performed to avoid hematoma formation. A certain amount of blood is lost through the drain. The necessity of wound drainage has been questioned, with a view towards blood saving, although most surgeons have not abandoned drainage for fear of local complications. A prospective randomized study was undertaken to compare drainage and non-drainage following THR/TKR in terms of blood-saving and local complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 256 patients undergoing primary THR (152) or TKR (104) were randomly allocated to undergo either suction drainage or no drainage of the wound: there were 76 drained and 76 non-drained THR's, 52 drained and 52 non-drained TKR's. Blood loss was calculated in each patient from the postoperative drop in hematocrit values; the amounts of blood lost intra-operatively and in the drain were also recorded, as was the number of blood units transfused in each patient. Swelling, hip or knee range of motion and wound healing were monitored over the first 6 weeks after operation, and any local or systemic complication was recorded. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted between drained and non-drained THR's/TKR's regarding swelling, recovery of hip or knee motion, wound healing, other local or systemic complications. Following THR, no significant difference was noted between calculated blood losses or transfusion requirements in drained versus non-drained patients. Patients with drains lost on average 1 942 ml of blood versus 1 766 ml for non-drained patients; they received on average 1.18 units of transfused blood versus 1.32 units for patients without drains. The differences are not significant. Following TKR, total blood loss was significantly higher in non-drained than in drained patients (1 983 ml versus 1 590 ml) and the amount of blood transfused was also significantly higher in non-drained patients (0.98 unit versus 0.54 unit). CONCLUSION: Following primary hip or knee arthroplasty, the use of wound drainage did not lead to increased blood loss, and non-drainage did not lead to significant wound healing problems but did not reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements. It was even associated, following TKR, with greater blood loss and transfusion. Such data may therefore be used to support drainage as well as non-drainage following THR or TKR. Avoiding drainage may be interesting in terms of cost, but the benefit is marginal; it also eliminates one possible source of retrograde wound infection. Systematic wound drainage following THR or TKR is essentially a tradition. This study shows that it can safely be dispensed with in a number of cases.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Preoperative internal biliary drainage is superior to external biliary drainage in liver regeneration and function after hepatectomy in obstructive jaundiced rats.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the differences in regeneration rates and functions of the liver at the time of and after hepatectomy in obstructive jaundiced rats with preoperative external and internal biliary drainage. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The significance of biliary drainage before surgery is controversial in patients with obstructive jaundice. METHODS: After biliary obstruction for 7 days, rats were randomly divided into three groups: obstructive jaundice and hepatectomy (OJ-Hx), external biliary drainage and hepatectomy (ED-Hx), and internal biliary drainage and hepatectomy (ID-Hx). The OJ-Hx group underwent hepatectomy without biliary drainage; the other two groups underwent hepatectomy after biliary drainage for 7 days. At the time of hepatectomy, all rats were provided with internal biliary drainage. On days 0, 1, 2, 3, and 7 after hepatectomy, the DNA synthesis rate and the concentrations of adenine nucleotides and malondialdehyde in the liver were determined as markers of the hepatic regeneration rate, energy status, and lipoperoxide concentration, respectively. Portal endotoxin concentrations were measured and serum hyaluronic acid concentrations were determined as an indicator of hepatic endothelial function. RESULTS: The relative liver weight was significantly higher in the ID-Hx group than in the OJ-Hx group on days 1, 3, and 7 after hepatectomy and than in the ED-Hx group on days 1 and 2. The rate of hepatic DNA synthesis was significantly higher in the ID-Hx group than in the OJ-Hx and ED-Hx groups on day 1. The rate was similar in the ED-Hx and ID-Hx groups on day 2 but was significantly higher than in the OJ-Hx group. The hepatic malondialdehyde concentration was significantly higher on day 1 in the ED-Hx group than in the other two groups. It was lowest in the ID-Hx group throughout the study. Both biliary drainage procedures lowered the portal endotoxin concentration and serum hyaluronic acid concentration at the time of hepatectomy. The serum hyaluronic acid concentration was lowest in the ID Hx group. Hepatic adenine triphosphate concentrations and energy charge levels were similar among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Although both external and internal biliary drainage before hepatectomy improved serum liver function tests, portal endotoxin concentration, and serum hyaluronic acid concentration at the time of surgery, preoperative internal biliary drainage was superior to external drainage, as evidenced by the better liver regeneration and function after hepatectomy.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A gastric conduit is usually used to reconstruct the foregut after esophagectomy for cancer. The gastric emptying may be impaired after this operation, so some esophageal surgeons routinely add a pyloric drainage procedure (pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the effect of pyloric drainage on patient outcomes. METHODS: Medline and manual searches were done (completed independently and in duplicate) to identify all published RCTs that addressed the issue of pyloric drainage procedures during gastric conduit reconstruction of the esophagus. The selection process was inclusive; no trials were excluded. Trial validity assessment was done, and a trial quality score was assigned. Early outcomes assessed by meta-analysis included operative mortality, esophagogastric anastomotic leaks, pulmonary morbidity, pyloric drainage complications, fatal pulmonary aspiration, and gastric outlet obstruction. A random-effects model was used, and the relative risk was the principal measure of effect. Systematic semiquantitative review was used for late outcomes such as gastric emptying, bile reflux, nutritional status, and obstructive foregut symptoms. RESULTS: Nine RCTs, that included a total of 553 patients, were selected, with quality scores ranging from 1 to 4 (5-point Jadad scale). Selection and validity agreement was strong. The relative risk (95% CI; p value), expressed as pyloric drainage versus no drainage (treatment vs. control), was 0.92 (0.34, 2.44; p = 0.86) for operative mortality, 0.90 (0.47, 1.76; p = 0.77) for esophagogastric anastomotic leaks, 0.69 (0.42, 1.14; p = 0.15) for pulmonary morbidity, 2.55 (0.34, 18.98; p = 0.36) for pyloric drainage complications, 0.25 (0.04, 1.60; p = 0.14) for fatal pulmonary aspiration, and 0.18 (0.03, 0.97; p = 0.046) for gastric outlet obstruction. Systematic semiquantitative review showed a nonsignificant trend favoring pyloric drainage for the late outcomes of gastric emptying, nutritional status, and obstructive foregut symptoms. For the late outcome of bile reflux, there was a nonsignificant trend favoring the no-drainage group. The scintographic gastric emptying time, expressed as a ratio (pyloric drainage/no drainage), was 0.53. CONCLUSIONS: Data synthesized from existing RCTs show that pyloric drainage procedures reduce the occurrence of early postoperative gastric outlet obstruction after esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction, but they have little effect on other early and late patient outcomes.

Drainage↗
PubMed2001

Superiority of portal venous drainage over systemic venous drainage in pancreas transplantation: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare portal and systemic venous drainage of pancreas transplants and demonstrate an immunologic and survival superiority of portal venous drainage. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Traditionally, solitary pancreas transplants have been performed using systemic venous and bladder drainage, but more recently, the advantages of enteric drainage have been well documented. Although physiologic benefits for portal venous drainage have been described, the impact of portal venous drainage, especially with solitary pancreas transplants, has yet to be determined. METHODS: Since August 1995, 280 pancreas transplants with enteric duct drainage were analyzed. One hundred and seventeen were simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK), 63 with systemic venous drainage (SV) and 54 with portal venous drainage (PV). The remainder were solitary transplants; 97 pancreas after kidney (PAK; 42 SV and 55 PV) and 66 transplants alone (PTA; 26 SV and 40 PV). Immunosuppressive therapy was equivalent for both groups. RESULTS: The groups were similar with respect to recipient characteristics and HLA matching. Thirty-six month graft survival for all transplants was 79% for PV and 65% for SV (P =.008). By category, SPK graft survival was 74% for PV and 76% for SV, PAK graft survival was 70% for PV and 56% for SV, and PTA graft survival was 84% for PV and 50% for SV. The rate of at least one rejection episode was also significantly higher in the SV group. At 36 months, for all pancreas transplants, the rejection rate was 21% for PV and 52% for SV (P <.0001). For SPK, rejection rates were 9% for PV and 45% for SV. For PAK, rejection rates were 16% for PV and 65% for SV, and for PTA 36% for PV and 51% for SV. The rejection rates for kidneys following SPK were also lower in the PV group (26% versus 43% for SV). Furthermore, the grades of rejection were milder in PV for all transplants (P =.017). By multivariate analysis, portal venous drainage was the only parameter that significantly affected rejection. CONCLUSION: Graft survival and rejection is superior for PV. These clinical findings are consistent with published reports of experimentally induced portal tolerance and strongly argue that PV drainage should be the procedure of choice for pancreas transplantation.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of open subxiphoid pericardial drainage with percutaneous catheter drainage for symptomatic pericardial effusion.

BACKGROUND: The optimal therapy for symptomatic pericardial effusions remains controversial. This paper compares outcomes after the two most commonly used techniques, percutaneous catheter drainage and operative subxiphoid pericardial drainage. METHODS: We performed a 5-year retrospective, single-institution study to analyze outcomes after either percutaneous catheter drainage or subxiphoid open pericardial drainage for symptomatic pericardial effusions. RESULTS: Symptomatic pericardial effusions in 246 patients were treated by open pericardiotomy and tube drainage (n = 150) or percutaneous catheter drainage (n = 96). Drainage duration, total drainage volume, and duration of follow-up (2.6 years) were similar in both groups. Effusions were classified malignant in 79 (32%) patients and benign in 167 (68%) patients. No direct procedural mortality occurred, but the hospital mortality was 16 patients (10.7%) in the open group and 22 (22.9%) in the percutaneous group (p = 0.01) The 5-year survival rate was 51% in the open group versus 45% in the percutaneous group, despite a greater percentage of the open group having a preoperative malignant diagnosis (35% versus 28%). Symptomatic effusions recurred in 16.5% of the percutaneous group compared with 4.6% in the open group (p = 0.002), and sclerosis did not appear to reduce recurrence rates (10.7% with sclerosis versus 15.6% without; p > 0.05). The diagnosis of malignancy was confirmed in 16 of 27 (59%) percutaneous procedures performed on patients with known malignancy. In the open group, cytologic and pathologic evaluation of the pericardial specimen revealed malignancy in 32 of 52 (62%) patients with known malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Subxiphoid and percutaneous pericardial drainage of symptomatic pericardial effusions can be performed safely; however, death occurs from underlying disease. Open subxiphoid pericardial drainage with pericardial biopsy appears to decrease recurrence but does not improve diagnostic accuracy of malignancy over cytology alone.

Catheterization↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of pancreas transplantation with portal venous and enteric exocrine drainage to the standard technique utilizing bladder drainage of exocrine secretions.

Although bladder drainage of pancreatic exocrine secretions has been reported to decrease morbidity and improve pancreas allograft survival, significant complications remain associated with this technique. Furthermore, this technique requires systemic venous drainage of pancreas allografts. Evidence suggests that portal venous drainage of pancreas grafts prevents hyperinsulinemia and improves lipoprotein composition. This report documents our initial experience with portal venous and enteric exocrine drainage of pancreas allografts (portal/enteric technique) and compares it with the standard technique of systemic venous and bladder exocrine drainage (systemic/bladder technique). Patient and allograft survival, as well as allograft function, were comparable for the two procedures. There were no significant technical complications in this pilot series. Enteric exocrine drainage was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of acidosis and dehydration when compared with bladder drainage (P<0.005). The portal/enteric technique also avoided reoperation for enteric conversion, as was required by 33% of patients in the systemic/bladder group. The incidence and outcome of allograft rejection were similar for the two techniques. These data suggest that combined pancreas/kidney transplantation with portal venous and enteric exocrine drainage is safe and results in outcomes similar to the standard technique, while eliminating many complications of bladder drainage. These findings should encourage additional studies to determine the consequences of portal venous drainage.

Drainage↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of intra-abdominal drainages on adhesion formation and prevention by phospholipids in a rat model. Drainages and adhesion formation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The study was designed to asses the adhesiogenic capacity of silicone drainages and the protective effect of phospholipids (PL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 75 Wistar rats were randomly assigned to the different groups. In a preliminary trial (pt; n = 15), all rats underwent midline laparotomy. The control group (C(pt); n = 5) received no further treatment. In the other animals, either an 'easy flow' drainage (EF(pt); n = 5) or an 'Aachen' drainage (AC(pt); n = 5) was placed into the abdominal cavity. In the final study (fs; n = 60), rats underwent laparotomy and colonic anastomosis. The control groups (C(fs)) received no drainages. In the other groups either one of the two types of drainages (EF(fs), AC(fs)) were introduced. In 50% of the rats, 75 mg/kg of PL were administered intraperitoneally (C(fs)+PL, EF(fs)+PL, AC(fs)+PL). The other rats received no additional treatment (C(fs)ØPL, EF(fs)ØPL, AC(fs)ØPL). All animals were sacrificed 10 days after surgery. Areas of adhesions and anastomotic bursting pressures were measured (mean +/- SD). RESULTS: In the preliminary trial, analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed no differences between the groups after application of drainages (values are given in mean +/- SD): C(pt) mean 23.3 +/- 29.4 mm(2), EF(pt) 829.7 +/- 679.3 mm(2), AC(pt) 609.9 +/- 219.4 mm(2). In the final study, 2-factorial ANOVA showed a significant effect (p < 0.001) for the use of drainages but not for the application of PL (C(fs)ØPL 140.6 +/- 124.2 mm(2), C(fs)+PL 67.7 +/- 60.4 mm(2), EF(fs)ØPL 1,217.0 +/- 458.3 mm(2), EF(fs)+PL 1,266.8 +/- 368.3 mm(2), AC(fs)ØPL 861.7 +/- 274.8 mm(2), AC(fs)+PL 544.2 +/- 193.8 mm(2)). Post hoc test for pairwise comparisons adjusted to Bonferroni showed significant differences (p < 0.001) between all of the three pairs (C(fs) 104.1 +/- 92.3 mm(2) vs. EF(fs) 1,241.9 mm(2) +/- 413.3 mm(2); C(fs) vs. AC(fs) 702.9 mm +/- 234.3 mm(2); EF(fs) vs. AC(fs)). DISCUSSION: The final study demonstrates the adhesiogenic capacity of silicone drainage tubes in combination with anastomoses. Any protective effect of PL alone or in combination with drainages could not be shown. CONCLUSIONS: Indication for the use of drainages in standard surgical procedures should be reconsidered within the scope of their potential to cause adhesions and subsequent complications.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2001

Protocol of a prospective cohort study of the effect of different methods of drainage of neuropathic bladder on occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, and adverse events related to the urinary drainage system in spinal cord injury patients.

BACKGROUND: To present a protocol of a prospective, cohort study in which four groups of spinal cord injury (SCI) patients will participate. (Patients with indwelling urethral catheter; patients who perform intermittent catheterisation without wearing a penile sheath; patients who perform intermittent catheterisation and wear penile sheath as well; and patients with penile sheath drainage). OBJECTIVES: (1) What is the incidence of symptomatic urinary infection in men with spinal cord injury who use different types of bladder drainage? (2) Which are predisposing factors for the occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection in men with spinal cord injury who practise different methods of bladder drainage? (3) What is the incidence of catheter and urinary drainage system-related adverse events in the four groups of SCI patients? PATIENTS: The criteria for inclusion are as follow: (1) Male patients with neuropathic bladder due to spinal cord injury, who are registered with the Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, England. (2) Age: 18 years or above. (3) Patients who are willing to give informed consent for participation in the study. (4) Patients willing to be contacted every two weeks by a staff of the spinal unit for 36 months. (5) Patients who are willing to maintain an accurate record of adverse events related to urinary catheter and urinary drainage system and predisposing factors for the occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection. (6) Patients, who are stabilised in a particular method of bladder drainage, and therefore, unlikely to make a permanent change in the method of bladder drainage (e.g. from penile sheath drainage to the use of long-term indwelling catheter) during a foreseeable future. METHODS: The participants will be observed for a period of 36 months. A staff of the spinal injuries unit will contact the participants by telephone every two weeks on a mutually agreed day and time. The information obtained during this standardised telephonic interview conducted once in two weeks will be entered in a database. When a participant develops symptom(s) suggestive of urinary infection, he will undergo urine and blood tests, and imaging studies of the urinary tract. CONCLUSION: This study will provide information regarding the occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, predisposing factors for development of urinary infection, and adverse events related to urinary catheter and urinary drainage system in SCI patients using different methods of bladder drainage.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

US-guided needle aspiration and catheter drainage as an alternative to open surgical drainage for uniloculated neck abscesses.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided needle aspiration and catheter drainage as an alternative to open surgical drainage of uniloculated neck abscesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients (11 female, four male; age range from 18 days to 78 years, mean 42.5 y +/- 22.4) diagnosed with deep neck infections associated with uniloculated neck abscesses were treated. The patients were originally scheduled for surgical incision and drainage after a period of unsuccessful treatment with antibiotics. US-guided needle aspiration (in 10 patients) and US-guided catheter drainage (in five patients) were performed under local anesthesia. Open surgical drainage was performed when US-guided drainage procedures failed. RESULTS: Surgical open drainage was avoided in 13 of the 15 patients (87%). An average of 6 mL of pus was obtained in patients in the needle aspiration group and 140 mL of pus was drained by catheter. One patient had a recurrent pyogenic lymphadenitis at the same location and was treated successfully by repeated needle aspiration. No complications occurred in this study. CONCLUSION: In a selected group of patients without imminent airway obstruction, most uniloculated neck abscesses may be managed initially by US-guided needle aspiration and catheter drainage before resorting to open surgical drainage.

Abscess↗
PubMed1998

Drainage systems in thyroid surgery: a randomised trial of passive and suction drainage.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of high-vacuum and passive drainage systems after elective thyroid resection. DESIGN: Prospective randomised clinical study and multicentre postal survey. SETTING: Military hospital, Germany. PATIENTS: 80 patients, treated with passive closed drains (n = 40) or high-vacuum systems (n = 40). INTERVENTIONS: 1. Measuring the amount of blood collected during drainage and the extent of residual haematoma on ultrasonography. 2. Survey in Austria, Germany and Switzerland of annual number of bilateral thyroid resections, type of drainage used, and volume of postoperative drainage. RESULTS: 799 of the 1698 hospitals surveyed replied (47.2%). 785 (98.2%) of the 799 surgeons said that they used drainage systems of whom 766 (97.6%) used high-vacuum systems. In the 40 patients in whom passive closed drainage was used, the median volume drained was 34 ml (range 0-175) compared with 115 ml (40-346) in the high vacuum group (p < 0.01). In the passive drainage group the extent of residual haematoma measured by us was 4.4 ml (range 0-21.7) compared with 5.3 ml (0.6-24.9) in the high vacuum group. CONCLUSIONS: The high-vacuum drainage that is most commonly used in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland results in increased blood loss with no reduction in the extent of residual wound haematoma and offers no additional advantage over passive drainage systems in thyroid surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Does cryotherapy before drainage increase the risk of intraocular haemorrhage and affect outcome? A prospective, randomised, controlled study using a needle drainage technique and sustained ocular compression.

AIMS/BACKGROUND: A prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial was conducted to investigate the effect of performing cryotherapy before drainage of subretinal fluid (SRF) on the incidence of intraocular haemorrhage (IOH) in the management of retinal detachment. METHODS: Eighty eyes of 80 patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment requiring SRF drainage were recruited. Thirty four cases were randomised to receive drainage before cryotherapy (drainage, air injection, cryotherapy, and explant = DACE group) while 46 cases had drainage after cryotherapy (cryotherapy, drainage, air injection, and explant = CDAE group). All cases had trans-scleral drainage of SRF using a 27 gauge hypodermic needle combined with prolonged, intraocular hypertension. RESULTS: There was a low incidence of IOH associated with drainage in both groups with no statistically significant difference between the groups (DACE group = 2.9%; CDAE group = 4.3%; p = 0.43). There was no significant difference between the groups in the rate of anatomical success with a single operation (DACE group = 82.4%; CDAE group = 86.9%; p = 0.38). There was no significant difference between the groups in the visual outcome. An improvement of two Snellen lines or more occurred in 52.9% of the DACE group and in 56.5% of the CDAE group (p = 0.93). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the surgical sequence of applying cryotherapy before drainage of SRF can be safely and effectively performed. The sequences CDAE and CDE, when air injection is not required, along with DACE should all be part of the surgical repertoire for the management of retinal detachments.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Flutter valve drainage bag is a useful device for the pleural drainage.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The purpose of the present study was to compare the use of the flutter valve pleural drainage bag and the conventional underwater seal system for the pleural drainage in the treatment of pneumothorax and pleural effusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Altogether fifty patients who needed the pleural drainage at our hospital between February and October 1999 were randomized to this prospective study either into the flutter valve pleural drainage group or into the conventional underwater seal pleural drainage group, 25 patients in each. RESULTS: In the conventional underwater seal system group, the mean drainage time was 4.1 (SD +/- 4.0) days and in the flutter valve drainage bag group 4.8 (SD +/- 4.9) days (difference -0.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.3 to 1.8). The mean length of hospitalization was 16.3 (SD +/- 20.9) days and 18.7 (SD +/- 27.0) respectively (difference -2.4, 95% CI -16.1 to 11.3). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that flutter valve drainage bag is a safe and feasible system in the most cases when pleural drainage is needed in the treatment of pneumothorax and pleural effusion.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

[Gravity drainage versus suction drainage: an experimental and clinical study].

The importance of wound drainage in casualty and plastic surgery is unquestioned. The most common form is suction drainage. This involves the disadvantage that the drain can become attached to the tissue by suction, stopping the flow and blocking the drain. In addition, the secretion reservoir must be made of rigid material, which means large package sizes are inevitable. Encouraged by our knowledge of silicone drains, we carried out a study comparing silicone drains (without vacuum) and PVC drains (with vacuum suction). Electron-microscope studies of the PVC drains used for suction drainage revealed adhesion of wound secretion and cell detritus to the inner wall and the drainage perforations after less than 24 h. No occlusion and almost no adherence was observed with silicone gravity drains. When compared in clinical use for joint drainage, neither system had any severe complications. Removal of gravity drains was considerably less painful than withdrawal of suction drains. In soft tissue drainage the volume of secretion drained off was more constant and obviously larger with gravity drainage. From these results we conclude that gravity drainage can replace suction drainage to considerable advantage.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1991

[Slit drainage versus Redon drainage in a clinical comparison--initial experiences with a new kind of wound drainage system].

In a prospective, randomised study we compared the clinical properties of the established Redon drain with a new type of drain called "slit drain". Both types of drains were examined regarding the amount of drained fluid, the time elapsing until removal of the drain, the frequency of occlusion of the lumen as well as the patient's pain and the required force at extraction of the drain. The statistical analysis showed both drains to have equal abilities in draining of fluid if they were used under vacuum conditions. If used as nonsuction drains, the new device was able to drain more fluid than the established type of drain (p less than 0.05). Statistically relevant advantages of the slit drain were seen in a lower rate of obstruction of the lumen, a higher amount of drained fluid (as non-suction device) as well as an easier and less painful extraction.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1984

Septic complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Evaluation of a new closed drainage system.

In a consecutive study of 49 patients with obstructive jaundice who underwent preoperative percutaneous transhepatic drainage, the incidence of bacteria in bile at the time of insertion of the drainage catheter was 29 percent. Patients drained with a conventional open drainage system showed an increase to 100 percent positive cultures after 20 days drainage. In this group, there was also a high incidence of episodes of bacteremia preoperatively and postoperatively and a high incidence of positive wound cultures. An antiseptic barrier incorporated into the drainage system reduced the incidence of positive bile cultures during the drainage period although this did not afford a significant reduction in bacteremic episodes and positive wound cultures. Using a new closed drainage system, the acquisition of environmental organisms to the bile was eliminated which allowed a significant reduction in septic complications both preoperatively and postoperatively. This new closed drainage system increased the value of preoperative decompression of the obstructed biliary tree by preventing exogenous bacterial contamination and reducing associated septic episodes.

Bacterial Infections↗