Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DISSECTION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

[Acute non-opacified dissection of the ascending thoracic aorta--significance of retrograde dissection and re-dissection].

Thirteen cases of acute aortic dissection with non-opacified false lumen of the ascending aorta were examined by CT and other imaging modalities. On the basis of the initial CT findings, these cases were classified into two types; one was pure non-opacified dissection not associated with opacified false lumen (Type N, n = 7), the other was non-opacified dissection of the ascending aorta associated with opacified false lumen of the following aorta (Type N+O, n = 6). On examining the relation between the entry site and the false lumen in Type N+O, the dissection of the ascending aorta was considered to be retrograde. Retrograde dissection seemed to be an important factor in the development of the non-opacified dissection of the ascending aorta. During the follow-up period, re-dissection in the ascending aorta occurred in four of the 13 cases (Type N = 3, Type N+O = 1). The re-dissection occurred within the first four weeks in all of them, and the diagnosis of re-dissection was possible at its early stage. In one case, ulcerlike projection (ULP) was detected by aortography. In another case, ULP was identified by cine-MR imaging. Contrast CT also revealed enlargement and small opacification of the false lumen. In two other cases, similar CT findings were observed. Three of the four patients recovered by surgical treatment. One died the day after the diagnosis of re-dissection. Early diagnosis and earliest possible surgical intervention for re-dissection were considered necessary to save the patients with re-dissected false lumen in the ascending aorta. Close observations with several imaging modalities, mainly CT examination, should be paid in the patients with non-opacified dissection of the ascending aorta for at least four weeks after the onset of dissection.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Coronary stenting for acute coronary dissection after coronary angioplasty: implications of residual dissection.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the implications of residual coronary dissections after stenting. BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting is currently used in selected patients with coronary dissection after angioplasty. However, in some patients the total length of the dissection may not be completely covered with the device. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients (mean [+/- SD] age 58 +/- 11 years; 39 men, 3 women) undergoing stenting for a major coronary dissection after angioplasty were studied. RESULTS: Thirty (67%) coronary dissections were small (< or = 15 mm), and 29 (64%) were occlusive (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade < or = 2). In 3 patients, coronary stenting was unable to open large occlusive dissections, but a good angiographic result was obtained in 39 patients (93%). After stenting, 22 of these patients (56%) had no visible residual dissections, and 13 (33%) had small and 4 (10%) had large residual dissections. These residual dissections were stable and did not compromise coronary flow. In a repeat angiogram (24 h later) the stent was patent in all 39 patients. However, two patients experienced a subacute stent occlusion. Of the remaining 37 patients, 36 (97%) had a late angiogram after stenting. Quantitative angiography revealed a reduction in minimal lumen diameter at the stent site (2.6 +/- 0.4 vs. 2 +/- 0.7 mm, p < 0.05) and a trend toward improvement in vessel diameter at the site of the previous residual dissection (1.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.9 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.1). The angiographic image of residual dissection disappeared in all patients. These factors provided a rather smooth angiographic appearance at follow-up. The four patients with large residual dissections after stenting did not have restenosis and were asymptomatic at last visit. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary stenting is effective in the management of acute coronary dissections after angioplasty. In this setting, small residual dissections are frequently seen but have a good outcome and disappear at follow-up. Large residual dissections may have a good outcome if coronary flow is not impaired and no residual stenosis is visualized.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

Lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Two- and 3-field lymph node dissection.

Patients' records were analyzed to evaluate the effect of lymph node dissection on the survival of patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Patients who underwent incomplete resection of the tumor were excluded from this study. A conventional lower mediastinal and abdominal lymph node dissection (conventional 2-field dissection) had been performed in 410 patients. A complete dissection of the upper mediastinal nodes was performed in addition in 121 patients (extended 2-field dissection). Sixty-four patients underwent a further dissection of the cervical periesophageal lymph nodes through the thoracic cavity (super-extended 2-field dissection). A cervical, mediastinal, and abdominal lymph node dissection was carried out in another 100 patients (3-field dissection). Background factors in the latter three groups were similar. Mean numbers of dissected lymph nodes in extended 2-field, super extended 2-field, and 3-field dissections were 32, 57, and 77, respectively. Operative mortality rates were 11%, 9%, and 3%, respectively. The five-year survival rates for patients who underwent extended 2-field or 3-field dissection were 43% and 61%; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.000113). The four-year survival rate for super-extended 2-field dissection was 53%. Among those patients who underwent 3-field dissection, 58 (58%) had histologically positive lymph nodes. Their five-year survival rate was 47%. The patients' survival has been improved by increasing the field of lymph node dissection without deterioration of operative mortality.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

[Retrograde type A dissection after endovascular stent grafting of type B dissection].

Acute aortic dissection is a disease with high mortality. Whereas acute dissection of the ascending aorta (Standford type A) is treated surgically, acute dissection of Stanford type B (descending aorta) is principally treated conservatively, but surgically in case of complications. Recently, another therapeutical option for the treatment of type B dissection has been developed using endovascular stent-grafts. We report on a 64-year-old woman with typical signs of acute aortic dissection. Computer tomography and transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated Stanford type B dissection. The patient was treated with an endovascular stent-graft, because of malperfusion of the right leg and chest pain. After successful closure of the entry by the stent, the patient developed acute right-sided hemiplegia one day after the intervention due to retrograde dissection into the aortic arch and ascending aorta. Upon immediate operation, the origin of the initially type B dissection was still sufficiently occluded by the endovascular stent-graft; however, there was another entry between the innominate artery and the left carotic artery near one proximal end of the stent's strut. Using deep hypothermia and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, the ascending aorta and proximal arch were replaced with a 28 mm Dacron-Velour tube and the aortic root was remodelled with a tongue-shaped Dacron graft preserving the valve cusps according to a modified Yacoub procedure. After the operation, neurological symptoms diminished and the patient could walk on the ward on day eleven. This case demonstrates retrograde type A dissection as a complication after interventional treatment of type B dissection using an endovascular stent-graft. The reason for this delayed complication is speculative. Aortic wall damage during stent inserting could be a possible cause. It is also likely that the patient initially had type B dissection with retrograde dissection of the distal part of the aortic arch. Therefore, one of the straight struts of the proximal end of the stent may have caused additional damage to the vulnerable dissected aortic wall in the arch, leading to retrograde type A dissection. Careful patient selection, detailed diagnosis of the aortic arch, improved stent designs and materials, especially regarding the stent's ends and careful insertion of the stent into the aortic arch, could contribute to prevention of the described problems.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Cervical artery dissections: evidence for redissection in previously dissected arteries: report of three cases.

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Among patients with spontaneous internal carotid artery (ICA) or vertebral artery dissections, there is a small but significant risk of development of dissection in an uninvolved ICA or vertebral artery at some time in the future. Recurrence of dissection in a previously dissected and healed ICA or vertebral artery is very rare. We retrospectively reviewed more than 400 cases of cervical artery dissections in our cerebrovascular records for 1970 through 2000. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: Three patients with recurrence of dissection in previously dissected and presumably healed ICAs were identified. All three patients were women. Their ages at the time of the initial dissection were 42, 38, and 31 years. Initial ICA dissections were bilateral in all cases, occurring simultaneously in one case and 1 year apart in the other two cases. All dissections were spontaneous. Redissection of a previously dissected and healed ICA in these three patents occurred 11, 6, and 12 years later, respectively. Two patients had fibromuscular dysplasia. CONCLUSION: Our experience with these three cases, from among more than 400 cases of cervical artery dissections treated at our institution, and the very limited number of reported cases in the literature indicate the rarity of recurrence of dissection in previously dissected and healed cervical arteries. An underlying arteriopathy may be suspected in many of these cases. Management requires medical and sometimes surgical approaches.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Post-operative morbidity following paediatric tonsillectomy; a comparison of bipolar diathermy dissection and blunt dissection.

In a prospective study of 76 children aged between 18 months and 13 years, 40 children underwent tonsillectomy using the traditional blunt dissection technique with bipolar diathermy to establish haemostasis while 36 children underwent tonsillectomy where bipolar diathermy alone was used to dissect out the tonsils. Blood loss was significantly reduced in the diathermy dissection group (10.5 ml +/- 2.05, diathermy dissection, 33.56 ml +/- 1.95, blunt dissection, P < 0.05). More analgesia was required in the diathermy dissection group prior to hospital discharge (P = 0.01). The diathermy dissection group took a significantly longer period of time to re-establish a normal diet (7.07 days +/- 0.44, diathermy dissection, 5.15 days +/- 0.36, blunt dissection, P = 0.001). Fifteen percent of children in the blunt dissection group and 31% in the diathermy dissection group were taken to the general practitioner between days 3-10 because of sore throat, poor oral intake or otalgia. Twenty two point four percent of children overall were prescribed antibiotics. This recently described technique of bipolar diathermy dissection could be a useful technique in selected cases such as the very small or those with a bleeding diathesis but is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and requires good postoperative analgesia.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed1997

Aortic dissection decades following internal carotid artery dissection--report of two cases.

Recurrent dissections involving carotid, vertebral, or renal arteries have been described in patients with spontaneous cervical artery dissections, with a maximal interval between dissections of fourteen years. The authors describe 2 patients in whom aortic dissections developed twenty-five and forty years, respectively, following carotid artery dissections. These 2 patients constituted 8% of the total number of patients from Rochester, Minnesota, who were diagnosed with aortic dissection between 1987 and 1992. The first patient, a forty-five-year-old woman, presented in 1948 with right neck pain and headache, associated with several episodes of transient numbness of the right face and numbness and clumsiness of the left upper and lower extremities. Examination showed right miosis. Angiography showed a stenosis of the extracranial right internal carotid artery beginning several centimeters from the bifurcation. She died at age eighty-five from an aortic dissection. The second patient, a thirty-eight-year-old man, noted left orbital and frontotemporal headaches and drooping of the left eyelid in 1962. Examination showed left oculosympathetic palsy. Angiography showed stenosis and an aneurysm in the midportion of the extracranial left internal carotid artery. He died at age sixty-three from an aortic dissection. These cases suggest that following a carotid artery dissection the risk of a recurrent arterial dissection may remain elevated for a prolonged period of time and the recurrent dissection may involve the aorta.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Endovascular stent-graft exclusion on aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm].

OBJECTIVE: To study the techniques and therapeutic effects of endovascular stent-graft exclusion in aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm. METHODS: The clinical data of 20 cases with aortic dissection and(or) dissecting aneurysm were analysed. Stanford A dissection was found in 2 cases, in which one had a tear entry on ascending aorta. Stanford B dissection was found in 18 cases. Five patients had two or more tear entries in different sites. Endovascular polyester-covered stent-graft exclusion was performed in all cases, of which, one case was also given fenestration and graft replacement and one subjected to Y graft bypass from ascending aorta to the left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery before endovascular stent-graft exclusion. RESULTS: No one died in operation. One patient died of heart infarction on the third day after operation. During the followup of 1 - 20 months, 19 patients were alive well (95%). The aortic dissections and(or) dissecting aneurysms of all the patients disappeared without endoleaks and organ or limb ischemia. CONCLUSION: Endovascular stent-graft exclusion with high successful rate, low mortality and high survival rate, is simple, safe and effective in treating aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Does information from axillary dissection change treatment in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer? An algorithm for assessment of impact of axillary dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The authors assessed the impact of axillary dissection on adjuvant systemic therapy recommendations in patients with breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: With increasing use of systemic therapy in node-negative women and the desire to reduce treatment morbidity and cost, the need for axillary dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer has been challenged. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-two women with clinically negative axillae were analyzed using a model treatment algorithm. Systemic therapy was assigned with and without data from axillary dissection. Treatment shifts based on axillary dissection data were scored. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of clinically node-negative women had pathologically positive nodes. Eight percent of T1a and 10% of T1b tumors had positive nodes and would have been undertreated without axillary dissection. Seven percent of premenopausal women with tumors < 1 cm and 13% with tumors > or = 1 cm had treatment changed by axillary dissection. For women 50 to 60 years of age, 10% with tumors < 1 cm, 17% with tumors 1 to 2 cm with positive prognostic features, and 4% with poor prognostic features had significant treatment shifts after axillary dissection. For clinically node-negative women older than 60 years of age not eligible for chemotherapy, only 3% of those with tumors < 1 cm and none of those with tumors > or = 1 cm had their treatment changed by findings at axillary dissection. Treatment shifts based on axillary dissection were larger if the treatment algorithm allowed for more varied or more aggressive treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained from axillary dissection will alter adjuvant systemic therapy regimen in a significant number of clinically node-negative women younger than 60 years of age and for older women eligible to receive chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection.

BACKGROUND: Extracranial internal carotid artery dissection can lead to occlusion of the artery and hence cause an ischemic stroke. It is the underlying stroke mechanism in approximately 2.5% of all strokes, and the second leading cause of stroke in patients younger than 45 years of age. Antithrombotic agents (heparin, oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs) may prevent arterial thrombosis in eICAD, but these benefits may be offset by increased bleeding. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether antithrombotic drugs (antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulation) are effective and safe in treatment of patients with extracranial internal carotid artery dissection, and which is the better treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group specialised Trials Register for relevant randomised trials and controlled clinical trials. In addition, we performed comprehensive searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE and checked reference lists of all relevant papers for additional eligible studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials assessing the efficacy of antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants in the treatment of extracranial carotid artery dissection. For non-randomised trials, case series (studies), that reported on antithrombotic treatment with at least 4 patients, were eligible. All trials and studies were assessed for eligibility. Data from all eligible studies were extracted independently by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on the primary outcome measures were extracted systematically. These were: all deaths, vascular deaths, and disability. Secondary outcomes were: first stroke occurrence, stroke recurrence, any stroke during reported follow-up, extracranial haemorrhage, and intracranial haemorrhage. The first choice treatment was taken for analyses. MAIN RESULTS: No randomised trials and 49 case series (including 683 treated patients) were identified. No reliable comparisons of antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants with control were available. 24 eligible studies including 286 patients (who either received antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants) were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in odds of death comparing antiplatelet drugs with anticoagulants, odds ratio (OR) 2.41, 95% CI 0.27-21.80). There was also no significant difference in the odds of being alive but disabled (OR 1.65, 95% CI 0.50-5.42). Few major haemorrhages were reported. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There were no randomised trials comparing either anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs with control. There is, therefore, no evidence to support their routine use for the treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery dissection. There were also no randomised trials, that directly compared anticoagulants with antiplatelet drugs, and the reported non-randomised studies did not show any evidence of a significant difference between the two. We suggest that a randomised trial including at least 1000 patients in each treatment arm with this condition is clearly needed.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2002

Importance of dissection in learning anatomy: personal dissection versus peer teaching.

Two studies or approaches to time savings in teaching gross anatomy were implemented and tested. Personal dissection vs. peer teaching of the upper and lower extremities revealed subtle effects of dissection on examination performance. Although peer teaching was generally successful, students preferred to dissect for themselves, lacking confidence in being taught by other students. ANOVA and multiple range tests carried out on the examination means indicated no difference between each student's scores on upper and lower extremity questions. However, subtle effects were reflected in significant differences (P < 0.05) in both ratio (upper%/lower%) and difference (upper%-lower%) between each student's percent scores on upper extremity and lower extremity questions, indicating enhanced performance on the extremity dissected. Students dissecting both extremities were intermediate in both ratio and difference, and not significantly different from either the "upper" or "lower" extremity groups. A questionnaire indicated that students who dissected only one extremity would have preferred to have dissected both extremities, and, contrary to overall examination performance, disagreed that they had learned both extremities at a satisfactory level. Although documenting adequate learning with time savings, the results are consistent with the contention that hands-on dissection enhances learning and confidence in the subject matter, because examination performance as well as personal satisfaction was enhanced on the extremity that was dissected.

Anatomy↗
PubMed1996

Mini-laparotomy pelvic lymph node dissection minimizes morbidity, hospitalization and cost of pelvic lymph node dissection.

PURPOSE: We compared efficacy, morbidity and cost of mini-laparotomy pelvic lymph node dissection and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients underwent mini-laparatomy, laparoscopic or standard pelvic lymph node dissection during a 24-month period. Nodal yield, complications, hospitalization and postoperative analgesic requirements were retrospectively evaluated. Operative expenses and the cost of postoperative hospitalization were standardized to a base cost for comparison. RESULTS: Mini-laparotomy pelvic lymph node dissection has an operative time (90 minutes) and nodal yield (9) similar to those of standard pelvic lymph node dissection, and morbidity and postoperative hospitalization (1.3 days) are comparable to those of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. The expense of the mini-laparotomy procedure is approximately 50% that of the laparoscopic procedure due primarily to the prolonged operative time (190 minutes) and disposable instrument costs ($665) of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-laparotomy pelvic lymph node dissection competes successfully with laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in terms of efficacy and morbidity at significant cost savings.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Persistent dissection of carotid artery in patients operated on for type A acute aortic dissection--carotid ultrasound follow-up.

Over a period of 5 years, 124 patients were operated on at the National Institute of Cardiology in Warsaw for acute aortic dissection, 27 of whom died. The 97 patients discharged from the hospital were included in the present analysis. The age of the patients ranged from 25 to 73 years with a mean of 50+/-10 years. Ultrasound examination of carotid arteries was performed with the patient lying on his back using a Toshiba 340A color Doppler system with a linear array probe of 7.5 MHz. Of the 97 patients examined, 15 (15%) had a dissection of at least one of the common carotid arteries (CCA). Two had Marfan syndrome. In 11 patients the dissection involved the right common carotid artery and in four it involved both the left and right common carotid arteries. The flow in the true lumen of CCA and ICA was preserved in all patients and the degree of narrowing ranged from 30 to -70%. Only one of the 15 patients with CCA dissection had an ipsilateral neurological deficit which was already present before the aortic aneurysm operation. Ultrasound follow-up was performed in all patients with the CCA dissection found on first examination. The mean duration of follow-up was 21 months. In 14 patients the degree and extent of the dissection as well as the narrowing of the true lumen was comparable, and in one patient the false channel closed spontaneously. During follow-up there were no new major neurological events despite the persistence of the CCA dissection with different degrees of narrowing of the true lumen. Doppler ultrasound examination of the carotid arteries can supply additional information about the extent of the dissection, and help to assess the flow in the persisting 'double channel' common carotid artery during the follow-up of patients.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

Coagulopathy associated with residual dissection after surgical treatment of type A aortic dissection.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the effects of a residual dissection on coagulation, fibrinolysis, and platelet function after surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Between 1987 and 1995, 48 consecutive patients underwent emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Thirty-five of 41 survivors were followed-up for periods ranging from 6 to 112 months (median, 30.3 months). These survivors were classified into three groups by computed tomographic scanning and angiography. Fifteen patients had no residual dissection (group I). Of the 20 patients who had residual dissection, nine had an enlarged aorta greater than 45 mm in maximal diameter (group II), and 11 had an aorta less than 45 mm in maximal diameter (group III). For all patients, blood samples were collected for coagulation, fibrinolysis, and platelet function studies on the same day that the computed tomographic scanning had been performed. RESULTS: beta-thromboglobulin, thrombin-antithrombin III complex, D-dimer, and alpha 2 plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex concentrations were significantly higher in group II than in the other two groups. Strong correlations between the maximal diameter of the dissected aorta and beta-thromboglobulin, thrombin-antithrombin III complex, D-dimer, and plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex concentrations were evident. In contrast, correlations between the length of the dissected aorta and coagulation/fibrinolysis measurements were weak. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the coagulopathy worsened in proportion to the degree of dilatation of the dissected aorta.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Endovascular treatment of ruptured dissecting aneurysms aimed at occlusion of the dissected site by using Guglielmi detachable coils.

OBJECT: Surgical or endovascular occlusion of the parent artery proximal to an aneurysm has been recommended for treatment of dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial posterior circulation. However, dissecting aneurysms may rupture even after proximal occlusion because distal progression of thrombus is necessary to occlude the dissecting aneurysm completely, and this may be delayed by the presence of retrograde flow. In this article the authors present their experience in treating six patients with ruptured dissecting aneurysms. METHODS: The authors report on six patients with a ruptured dissecting aneurysm in the posterior fossa who were successfully treated by endovascular occlusion of the aneurysm by using Guglielmi detachable coils. The procedure was particularly aimed at occluding the dissected site. CONCLUSIONS: At the present time, endovascular occlusion of the dissected site is a safe, minimally invasive, and reliable treatment for dissecting aneurysms when a test occlusion is tolerated and adequate collateral circulation is present.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Three-field dissection or two-field dissection?--A proposal of new algorithm for lymphadenectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There are no systematic criteria for cervical lymphadenectomy in esophageal carcinoma. We provide a new algorithm for deciding whether to use three-field dissection or two-field dissection. METHODOLOGY: Ninety-eight patients underwent curative esophagectomies with three-field lymph node dissections for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. We examined the outcomes and predictors for survival of these patients. Therefore, we devised a new decision tree for deciding whether to use three-field dissection or two-field dissection. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate for the 98 patients was 41.3%. The number of positive nodes was the only significant predictor for survival in the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. The outcomes of patients with positive supraclavicular/internal jugular nodes were poor. On the other hand, positive cervical paraesophageal nodes do not worsen prognosis. We provided a new algorithm for selecting procedure of lymphadenectomy based on the presence of lymph node metastases. This algorithm is decided by the number of positive nodes, the presence of cervical node metastasis and recurrent nerve node metastasis. According to this decision tree, there were a few patients who needed absolutely three-field dissections. CONCLUSIONS: The new algorithm may be helpful for deciding three-field dissection or two-field dissection for thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

[CT diagnosis of acute aortic dissection; clinical importance of acute aortic dissection with non-opacified false lumen].

Sixteen (47.5%) of 35 patients with acute aortic dissection showed a non-opacified crescent in the aorta on an initial contrast CT. Seven of these 16 patients underwent cineangiography soon after the initial CT, and in all 7 patients, neither an intimal tear nor an intimal flap was obtained. All but one of above 16 patients were followed by CT. Mean duration of follow-up was 9.6 months. In 10 of 15 patients with non-opacified false lumen, the false lumen remained non-opacified until the last examination. Moreover, in 6 of these 10 patients, the false lumen shrunk, and in the other 3, it disappeared completely on follow-up CT. On the other hand, in remaining 5 of these 15 patients who were initially diagnosed to have non-opacified false lumen, the false lumen became opacified and enlarged in size on follow-up CT performed in the first 14 weeks. Moreover, in 4 of these 5 patients, the false lumen became opacified in the only first 6 weeks. No matter how intensive care should be paid at least for the first 6 weeks, it seems that patients with aortic dissection which have non-opacified false lumen had good prognosis in comparison to patients with ordinary aortic dissections which have opacified false lumen. We believe aortic dissection with non-opacified false lumen may consist of two type of aortic dissection, one has no intimal tear, the other has some intimal tears and a thrombosed false lumen. In conclusion, CT is the most useful modality in diagnosing acute aortic dissection. The reasons are the incidence of acute aortic dissection with non-opacified false lumen was high, patients with non-opacified false lumen had good prognosis, and it was difficult to diagnose aortic dissection with non-opacified false lumen by conventional cineangiography and/or DSA.

Acute Disease↗