SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
The sensitivity, on basic disinfectants, of 30 strains of bacteria isolated from disinfecting fluid used in hospitals were estimated. The sensitivity of isolated strains were compared with that of laboratory test strains.
BACKGROUND: The benefit of alcohol-based disinfectant used on normal skin has been debated. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of repeated exposure to an alcohol-based disinfectant, a detergent and an alcohol-based disinfectant/detergent alternately for 10 days, including noninvasive measurements in the evaluation. Skin reactivity in irritated skin after a 4-week interval was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Detergent, disinfectant and alternate disinfectant and detergent were applied twice daily every 10 min for 1 h to the ventral upper arms and forearms of 17 healthy volunteers. A control area was included. After 4 weeks an SLS patch was applied to each area. Irritant reactions were quantified with a visual score recording and measurements of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin colour were performed on days 1, 5, 11, 38 and 40. RESULTS: On day 5 the detergent caused a higher visual score than either disinfectant applied alone or alternate disinfectant and detergent, P < 0.05. On day 11 detergent and alternate disinfectant and detergent caused a higher score than disinfectant, P < 0.05. An increased irritant response for detergent compared with disinfectant alone and alternate disinfectant and detergent was confirmed by TEWL evaluations on days 5 and 11, P < 0.001, while no significant difference was found by colour measurement. After 4 weeks, when evaluated by colour measurement, significantly less response to the SLS patch was found on the disinfectant-treated area compared with the control area and detergent area, and a similar trend was found for TEWL, although it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Alcohol-based disinfectant caused less visible skin irritation and less skin barrier disruption than the use of detergent. The alternate use of detergent and disinfectant caused less irritation than the use of detergent, and a possible interaction between the two irritants was not indicated. After 4 weeks there was a tendency for decreased skin reactivity in the skin areas which had 4 weeks previously been exposed to disinfectant.
A full continuous disinfection programme, consisting of disinfection during cleanout of poultry houses prior to placement of chickens, disinfection of the drinking water and spray disinfection of the birds during production was evaluated in broilers under experimental condition as well as under field conditions. Under controlled conditions, the experimental design consisted of three groups, two of which were control groups. Each group comprised 300 chickens. In one of the control groups, no disinfection of the pens was undertaken prior to the placement of the chickens. In the other control group, disinfection of the pens prior to placement of the birds was carried out using a glutaraldehyde-based product. In the test group, disinfection prior to placement was done. The drinking water of these birds was treated continuously and the birds were sprayed with a non-toxic disinfectant during production. Production parameters, such as growth rate, feed conversion ratio and feed consumption, of the birds in the three groups were monitored. In addition, all mortalities in the different groups were recorded and classified into diseases of an infectious nature, non-infectious nature and unknown category. Bacterial counts were also done on a weekly basis from the different pens. In this experiment, it was shown that the full continuous disinfection programme resulted in a lower number of mortalities caused by infectious agents as well as a reduction in the bacterial counts in the pens treated with the full continual disinfection programme. The full continuous disinfection programme was also tested on a commercial poultry farm in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa. Two production houses of 3,500 birds were randomly selected as test houses for the full continuous disinfection programme. Another similar house, which received day-old chicks from the same batch as the other two houses, was selected as the control house; it received the routine disinfection procedure prior to placement of the chicks. During the course of this experiment, a severe outbreak of Newcastle disease was experienced on this farm. It was demonstrated that, in the face of this severe challenge, the full continuous disinfection programme controlled the spread of the disease in both the houses where it had been applied at a stage when in every other house (including the control house) on the farm birds were suffering very high mortalities.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A new safe chlorination disinfection process, the sequential disinfection process with short-term free chlorine plus chloramines was investigated its efficiency on control of indices of microorganism, disinfection by-products and bio-stability. This disinfection process may take the advantage of free chlorine's quick inactivation of microorganism and chloramines' low DBP yield and long-term residual. Thus, both control of microorganisms and DBPs can be achieved effectively and economically. The pilot test results show that safe chlorination disinfection process has a little better efficiency on total bacteria count, HPC and total coliform count than free chlorination disinfection, which indicate that free chlorine and chloramines might have the synergetic disinfection effect for their different attacking targets. It also had the same inactivation efficiency on polio virus and coliphage f2 as free chlorination in 120 minutes contact time. Sequential chlorination disinfection process could reduce 35.8% - 77.0% yield of trihalomethane and 36.6% - 54.8% yield of haloacetic acids. The poorer quality the water had, the more advantage the safe-chlorination disinfection had than free chlorination disinfection one. Moreover, sequential chlorination had better efficiency on bio-stability control than free chlorination.
The antimicrobial activities of three non-peroxide soft contact lens chemical disinfection systems--ReNu Multi-Purpose Solution (0.00005% polyaminopropyl biguanide), Opti-Soft Disinfecting Solution (0.001% polyquaternium-1), and Opti-Free Rinsing, Disinfecting & Storage Solution (0.001% polyquaternium-1)--were compared to Soft Mate Disinfecting Solution (0.005% chlorhexidine digluconate). Each product was separately inoculated with each of five microorganisms at approximately 10(6) microorganisms per mL. All of the solutions demonstrated excellent disinfecting activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis, with complete disinfection occurring within 4 hours. Only Soft Mate disinfected Serratia marcescens within 4 hours. ReNu reduced the microorganisms to 10-100 cells/mL and Opti-Soft and Opti-Free reduced the number to 10(2)-10(3) cells/mL. For the fungal species, Soft Mate showed excellent activity against Candida albicans (disinfection in 4 hours) and reduced Aspergillus fumigatus to 10(3) spores/mL in 4 hours. After 4 hours ReNu, Opti-Soft, and Opti-Free had reduced C. albicans only slightly, to 10(5) cells/mL and displayed virtually no disinfecting activity against A. fumigatus. For these newer chemical disinfection systems, diligent cleaning and rinsing of the soft contact lenses are the most important steps in the patient care regimen.
UNLABELLED: Gastrointestinal endoscopy can lead to infectious complications, and endoscopes must be disinfected to prevent them. AIM: to evaluate three methods of disinfection: 1) usual cleaning technique and immersion in glutaraldehyde phenolate (GP); 2) meticulous cleaning and immersion in GP, and 3) meticulous cleaning and immersion in hydrogen peroxide. METHOD: thirty endoscopes (15 gastroscopes and 15 colonoscopes) were disinfected with each method. Samples were taken following endoscopic exploration, after cleaning and after disinfection, and were cultured. The number of positive culture (cfu/ml > 1) was counted. RESULTS: the rate of contamination of endoscopes did not decrease significantly after cleaning with method 1 (66 vs 60%), but did decrease with method 2 (38 vs 16%) and method 3 (53 vs 17%). The contamination rate after cleaning was significantly lower with methods 2 and 3 (p < 0.005). This rate was also lower after disinfection (p < 0.025). Method 3 achieved 0% contamination following disinfection. CONCLUSIONS: the greatest decrease in contamination rate was achieved with conscientious cleaning followed by disinfection. Both disinfectants yielded similar results, although hydrogen peroxide produced a higher level of disinfection.
Robert Kochs studies on disinfection are distinguished by well defined, clear experimental arrangement and commitment to practice. He investigated the effectiveness of disinfection by following recultivation tests in vitro and in animal experiments. He examined chemical substances of different origin, the action of hot air and superheated steam with a spectrum of microorganisms, including bacterial spores. Priorities of the recent development in disinfection are among other things the application of steam disinfectors and of chemical disinfectants in the gas-phase e.g. for disinfection of tubes, the use of combinations of tensides with disinfectants, of disinfectants effective against spores of clostridium and against hepatitis viruses, of disinfectants with low corrosiveness and low toxicity against men and domestic animals. Disinfection is a component of a system of measures in antimicrobial regimes and in protective systems.
The effect of steam on sandpit disinfection was investigated by supplying steam into sandpits covered with a sheet cover. To evaluate the effect, total number of viable bacteria, number of aerobic sporeforming bacteria, coliforms and fecal coliforms were measured four weeks before, just before, immediately after, two and four weeks after the disinfection. Disinfection of coliforms and fecal coliforms was accomplished when temperature of sand reached more than 60 degrees C. Total number of viable bacteria and number of aerobic sporeforming bacteria also reduced by disinfection with steam. However, after 2 and 4 weeks of disinfection, number of coliforms and fecal coliforms recovered to the same level before disinfection, and total viable count also restored its number. In addition, a significant increase in the number of aerobic sporeforming bacteria was noted both after 2 and 4 weeks of disinfection. These results indicate that the effect of steam disinfection in transient and can not be used for the routine method of disinfection in sandpit.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Since 1965, besides the use of scrubbing disinfectants, a number of alcoholic handrub methods are employed in the surgical skin disinfection of the hands. These contain, in addition to the alcohols, substances such as phenols and among others, cation-active substances. The efficacy of the substances is examined by means of in vitro-tests and through investigations conducted under conditions approximating those in the practice in accordance with the guidelines set down by the German Society of Hygiene and Microbiology. The comparison between the alcohol-containing handrub disinfectants and the scrubbing methods indicates clearly that the latter achieve only a low germ-reduction effect. The investigation on 4 alcoholic handrub disinfectants showed an initial potent germ-reducing and a good long-term effect. When mechanical scrubbing of the hands is carried out in a timely relationship to the application of the handrub -method, it is found to be able to produce extensive dermal damages. The reduction in the transient microbial flora by means of the mechanical hand scrubbing is minimal. The study on the germ-reduction after surgical disinfection of the hands using alcoholic handrub disinfectants in combination with and without initial soap-scrubbing demonstrated no differences, neither in the number of sterile hands nor in the averages of germ-reduction. The investigations conducted confirmed the excellent efficacy of the alcoholic handrub disinfectants and pointed out that it is unnecessary to combine mechanical hand scrubbing and the employment of alcoholic disinfectants in the same process.
The disinfectant solutions Dettox (based on a quaternary ammonium compound) and Gigasept (based on succine dialdehyde) were evaluated during disinfection procedures with a new disinfecting apparatus for gastrointestinal fibrescopes. Thorough disinfection was achieved after 2 minutes using Dettox 8% or Gigasept 10%; persistent fibrescope contamination with Gram-negative organisms was found after disinfection with Dettox 4% or Gigasep 5%. No adverse effects in endoscopy staff or damage to fibrescopes were seen. Adequate disinfection of endoscopic equipment prevents endoscopy-related infection and can be readily achieved by trained endoscopy staff using rapidly bactericidal disinfectants.
The aims of this research were to study the influence of peracetic acid (PAA) on the formation of mutagens in surface waters used for human consumption and to assess its potential application for the disinfection of drinking water. The results obtained using PAA were compared to those found with sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) and chlorine dioxide (ClO2). The Ames test, root anaphase aberration assay, and root/micronuclei assay in Allium cepa and Tradescantia/micronuclei test were used to evaluate the mutagenicity of disinfected samples. Microbiological tests were also performed, and disinfection by-products (DBPs) were identified using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). A slight bacterial mutagenicity was found in raw lake and river water, and similar activity was detected in disinfected samples. A plant test revealed genotoxicity in raw river water, and microbiological analysis showed that PAA has bactericidal activity but lower than that of the other disinfectants. The DBPs produced by PAA were mainly carboxylic acids, which are not recognized as mutagenic, whereas the waters treated with the other disinfectants showed the presence of mutagenic/carcinogenic halogenated DBPs. However, additional experiments should be performed with higher concentrations of PAA and using water with higher organic carbon content to better evaluate this disinfectant.
The intention of investigations was to clear central problems of disinfecting testing in carrier model. Ways of practical and standardized evaluation should be found out. Concrete investigations were made to guarantee a highly and regularly initial bacterial count, practical germ carriers and organic matter as also detecting damaged bacteria. Investigations for resistance level of test organisms were made in suspension test with formaldehyde as reference disinfectant. It was obviously that test organisms used in disinfecting testing were after 8 weeks more sensitive against disinfectants. Therefore results of disinfecting testing are often no representative because those test organisms are not qualified for representative declaration of disinfectant efficiency. Animal passage in distance of 8 weeks is a possibility for guaranteeing highly and regularly resistance of microorganisms We recommend to use soft wood from the same origin, addition of 10% horse serum and 1% carboxymethylcellulose as organic matter for a model relating to practice. Buffered peptone water and nutrient agar are guarantee for detecting damaged bacteria after disinfecting.
Following a former suggestion (4) always to evaluate, the efficacy of procedures for Hygienic disinfection of hands in comparison with the results of a certain standard disinfection method, Ethanol, iso- and n-Propanol were tested in various concentrations and for various times of action on their usability in such a standard method. The disinfecting power was dependent upon (i) the alcohol (Ethanol less than iso-Propanol less than n-Propanol), (ii) the concentration (Ethanol: 60 less than 70 less than 80% ml/ml, iso-Propanol: 50 less than 60 less than 70, n-Propanol: 40 less than 50 less than 60 = 70) and (iii) the time of action (0,5 less than 1 less than 2 min). n-Propanol proved to be the fastest acting disinfectant. However, as standard disinfection method iso-Propanol (60% ml/ml) being used for 1 min has been proposed. Furthermore, the following results that have been obtained also in former investigations (8) could be confirmed: (i) there is no systematic difference between the release of test-bacteria from the fingertips of right and left hands of test-persons (ii). The efficacy of procedures for Hygienic disinfection of hands is besides other factors influenced by the testpersons. This factor may be eliminated by using the same testpersons for both, the disinfection procedure under investigation and the standard method. The results of both may, then, be related to each other and the efficacy of the former may be evaluated in comparison to the latter.