Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DIAGNOSIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Detection and diagnosis of delirium in the elderly: psychiatrist diagnosis, confusion assessment method, or consensus diagnosis?

The clinical diagnosis of delirium has traditionally been based on an assessment by one or more physicians. Because of the transient, ubiquitous, and fluctuating nature of the symptoms of delirium, however, this approach may be flawed. Therefore, we decided to compare diagnosis based on one assessment by a psychiatrist, diagnosis by a nurse clinician (using the Confusion Assessment Method [CAM] and multiple observation points), and diagnosis by consensus. The study subjects were 87 patients aged 65 and over who were admitted consecutively from the emergency department to the medical wards, and who scored 3 or more on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. All subjects were assessed independently by one of three psychiatrists (a chart review and clinical examination) and a nurse clinician (using the CAM and multiple observation points). A consensus conference, attended by the three psychiatrists and the nurse clinician, used all available information to reach a consensus diagnosis. Compared to the consensus diagnosis, the clinical diagnosis by a psychiatrist had a sensitivity of .73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: .61-.85), a specificity of .93 (95% CI: .79-1.0), and an agreement kappa coefficient of .58 (95% CI: .41-.74). The nurse clinician diagnosis had a sensitivity of .89 (95% CI: .81-.97), a specificity of 1.00, and an agreement kappa coefficient of .86 (95% CI: .75-.97). These results suggest that one clinical assessment by a psychiatrist may not be the best method for detecting and diagnosing delirium in the elderly. A consensus diagnosis or diagnosis by a trained rater (using the CAM and multiple observation points) may be more sensitive approaches.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Diagnosis related groups, refined diagnosis related groups and pediatric modified diagnosis related groups in specialist children's hospitals.

The value of Diagnosis Related Groups, Refinement Diagnosis Related Groups and Pediatric Modified Diagnosis Related Groups in measuring the output of specialist children's hospitals was evaluated by the examination of discharge data for 1987-88 from three major Australian children's hospitals and four district hospitals. The study included all patients aged 0-18 years but excluded those with specific neonatal diagnoses. Findings indicated that Refinement Diagnosis Related Groups seem to give a better measure of the output of specialist children's hospitals than Version 5 Diagnosis Related Groups in that they explained a higher proportion of variation of length of stay. Pediatric Modified Diagnosis Related Groups developed in the United States of America for specialist children's hospitals overall did not seem to have major advantages over Refinement Diagnosis Related Groups but there were some specific Pediatric Groups that appeared beneficial. Further modification of the Refinement Diagnosis Related Groups could allow these advantages to be incorporated. Overall it seems preferable for there to be a similar system measuring output of both children's hospitals and general hospitals and this could be achieved by some minor changes to the Refinement Diagnosis Related Groups.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Rapid trisomy diagnosis (21, 18, and 13) using fluorescent PCR and short tandem repeats: applications for prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Prenatal diagnosis of fetal trisomies is usually performed by cytogenetic analysis from amniotic fluid. This requires lengthy laboratory procedures and high costs and is unsuitable for large-scale screening of pregnant women. An alternative method, which is rapid and inexpensive and may potentially be suitable for diagnosing trisomies even from single fetal cells, is the fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (F-PCR) using polymorphic small tandem repeats (STRs). RESULTS: In this paper we present data demonstrating that fluorescent PCR amplification of STRs can be used for rapid diagnosis of trisomy 21, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13 and can be successfully applied to both prenatal diagnosis and diagnosis of single cells. This study also reports significant numbers of prenatal diagnoses using quantitative fluorescent PCR. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that further studies of greater numbers of samples will determine the absolute reliability of this technique. These results also provide a model for trisomy diagnosis from single cells using multiple STR markers for either preimplantation genetic diagnosis or, potentially, diagnosis from fetal cells isolated from maternal blood.

Chromosomes, Human↗
PubMed1992

Diagnosis of dementia in a heterogeneous population. A comparison of paradigm-based diagnosis and physician's diagnosis.

Each of 430 subjects received a diagnosis using two independent methods: a test-based quantitative paradigm and a semistructured neurological examination by a physician. The paradigm diagnosis was based on a battery of tests that assessed short- and long-term verbal memory and short-term nonverbal memory, orientation, construction, abstract reasoning, and language. The subjects came from a community in Manhattan County, in New York City, and were characterized by diversity with respect to both ethnicity (29.1% black, 33.4% Hispanic) and educational level (23.5% with 6 or fewer years of education, 25.6% college educated). Based on the paradigm, 10.5% of subjects received diagnoses of dementia, 29.1% of cognitive impairment, and 60.5% of normal. Based on the physician's diagnosis, 9.8% were demented, 21.6% cognitively impaired, and 68.6% normal. There was agreement between the two diagnostic methods for 71.8% of subjects. Diagnostic disagreement (n = 121) was in most cases between normal and cognitively impaired (71.0%) or between cognitively impaired and demented (21.5%). There were only nine cases (7.5%) in which a subject was judged demented by one method and normal by the other. The reliability of each method with respect to the other was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient, .62), while the reliability of a composite diagnosis based on both methods was much higher (.77). The paradigm was more likely than the physician to give the diagnosis of dementia to patients with low educational levels. The physician's diagnosis was strongly influenced by measures of functioning and by the mental status test administered in the semistructured neurological examination. Race and diagnosis were not related when the effect of education was controlled.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Prenatal diagnosis of non-ketotic hyperglycinaemia: enzymatic diagnosis in 28 families and DNA diagnosis detecting prevalent Finnish and Israeli-Arab mutations.

Prenatal diagnosis for non-ketotic hyperglycinaemia (NKH) was performed by enzymatic analysis of chorionic villus samples in 28 families and by DNA analysis in two families. In 26 families, enzymatic analysis of the glycine cleavage multi-enzyme system (GCS) yielded an unambiguous diagnosis; inconclusive results in two families were due to borderline GCS activity. We analysed a second chorionic sample in these two families. In one case, GCS activity was normal in the second specimen, and the baby did not have NKH. In the other case, we again found extremely low GCS activity in the second specimen, but a healthy baby was born. The cause of this false-positive result is unknown. Molecular analysis of NKH has identified two prevalent mutations to date; the S564I mutation in a gene encoding the P-protein, a component of the GCS, in a Finnish population, and the H42R mutation in a gene encoding the T-protein in the Israeli-Arab population. These prevalent mutations allow us to obtain unambiguous prenatal diagnoses in both Finnish and Israeli-Arab families. GCS activity in samples from a Finnish family demonstrated a good agreement with DNA analysis, but the fetus of the Israeli-Arab family had an upper limit activity of the affected range, suggesting an advantages for DNA analysis.

Amino Acid Oxidoreductases↗
PubMed1994

FRAXA locus in fragile X diagnosis: family studies, prenatal diagnosis, and diagnosis of sporadic cases of mental retardation.

Three hundred eighty-seven individuals from 32 Finnish fragile X families were studied, using the probe StB12.3 [Oberlé et al., 1991: Science 252:1097-1102] for the FRAXA locus, to reveal length variations in the FMR-1 gene. As expected, the affected individuals (with few exceptions) showed a full mutation; a few affected individuals with a premutation only were found. Seventy percent of the females with a full mutation were affected. The size of the mutation remained unchanged in 6, increased in 73, and decreased in 6 female meioses. In male meioses the size was unchanged in 15 cases, increased in 2 cases, and decreased in 1 case. Prenatal diagnosis was performed in 20 cases. In 7 of these the mutation was inherited by the fetus. Four hundred sixty-four mentally retarded patients were referred to us for FRAXA analysis. In 5% of these the fragile X mutation was found. In addition to the clear cut negative or positive results there were 6 cases in which an increase of 50-80 bp was detected. These findings may represent either large normal alleles or small premutations suggesting a possible tissue mosaicism which could explain the retardation of the patients.

Amniocentesis↗
PubMed1980

[Diagnosis and differential diagnosis in psychiatry and the question of situation referred prognostic diagnosis].

To diagnose--in its true meaning--is a search for etiology. The different sides of psychiatric diagnoses in this century do reflect the various attempts of this search. Examples are: Kraepelin's concept of etiological unity (morbus) of a disease, Bonhoeffer's attempt of separating exogenous from endogenous psychoses, K. Schneider's definition of psychiatric illness in terms of medical disease, Kretschmer's and Rümke's multidimensional diagnoses and Essen-Möller's principle of separating (postponing) etiology from psychopathological syndromes. The situationa prognostic diagnosis plays its main role in everyday diagnosing. It presupposes that one can recognize, distinguish and differentiate between different symptoms and diseases. The decision for a specific treatment reveals which etiology one thinks to be the main one. It presupposes that one has constantly to consider the kind, the severity and the course of psychiatric disease, Nosological thinking is necessary. The term etiology has a twofold meaning in Greek. 1. cause = causa and 2. accusation, guilt = culpa. In diagnosing psychiatric illnesses this double aspect plays an important role, though unconsciously and unwillingly. Though somatogenic (metabolic) as well as psychogenic (reactive) etiologies are etiologies in the sense of causa there is a fundamental difference between them. They have a common causa materialis but a different causa efficiens. In the first instance it is the non-personal side (related to pure matter), in the second instance the personal side which makes the difference. Only a person can be responsible. Where responsibility does play a role, there also accusation and guilt play a role.

Diagnosis, Differential↗
PubMed1988

ERCP diagnosis of tumors in the region of the head of the pancreas. Analysis of criteria and computer-aided diagnosis.

During the period 1974-1983, 320 patients with pancreas carcinoma, papilla of Vater carcinoma, bile duct bifurcation carcinoma, or duodenal carcinoma were examined by ERCP. Using 30 ERCP criteria, a radiological diagnosis was made. A valid pathological diagnosis was available in 200 patients (62.5%). In 183 of the 200 patients (91.5%), the ERCP diagnosis and the pathological diagnosis were identical. We then performed an analysis using 52 ERCP criteria. In 192 of the 200 patients (96.0%), the ERCP diagnosis based on this reanalysis and the pathological diagnosis were identical. By discriminant analysis, 13 ERCP criteria with a maximal discriminatory value were selected in patients in whom all diagnostic structures (bile ducts, pancreatic duct, and duodenum) were visible. Using these 13 criteria selected by discriminant analysis, the diagnostic score was 98.9%. A computer program based on these 13 ERCP criteria was designed for use in practice. The diagnostic accuracy of this computer program was 98.4%. Finally we tested this computer program on 171 new patients who were seen in the period 1983-1986. In 143 of the 171 patients, a valid pathological diagnosis was available (83.6%). Comparing the ERCP diagnosis in all patients (even if not all structures were visible) with a valid pathological diagnosis, the prospective score of the computer program was 91.6%. Using this program it was possible to evaluate examinations in which not all structures were visible. When the ERCP diagnosis was uncertain, the doubt could be quantified.

Ampulla of Vater↗
PubMed1987

Prospective pricing system by diagnosis-related groups: comparison of federal diagnosis-related groups with high-risk obstetric care groups.

Of 468 diagnosis-related groups identified by the federal government for Medicaid reimbursement, 15 are related to obstetric hospital care. Each diagnosis-related group is considered a distinct group in which cases are homogeneous with respect to resource consumption. Because the diagnosis-related group system is based primarily on data from community and secondary care hospitals, it does not differentiate sufficiently among high-risk obstetric patients seen at tertiary care institutions, such as Florida's Regional Perinatal Intensive Care Centers. We developed an alternative scheme for diagnosis-related groups, called obstetric care groups, using the federal diagnosis-related groups as the model from which to depart. Data collected for 4192 women during a 2 1/2-year period indicate that obstetric care groups provide more homogeneous groups than diagnosis-related groups for our population of high-risk patients. The obstetric care groups differentiate between no complications, one complication, and two or more complications, while the diagnosis-related groups differentiate only between no complications and one or more complications. Also, complications for obstetric care groups are based on only 19 diagnoses that contribute significantly to resource consumption, while the list of possible complications exceeds 200 for diagnosis-related groups. Although the obstetric care group classification system is simpler than that for diagnosis-related groups, it results in a more accurate reimbursement of hospitalization charges for high-risk obstetric care.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗
PubMed1995

Diagnosis-related group refinement with diagnosis- and procedure-specific comorbidities and complications.

Diagnosis-related groups have been revised through more refined uses of secondary diagnoses. Under the refined diagnosis-related groups, patients are distinguished with respect to classes of secondary diagnoses that are disease- and procedure-specific. Each class represents a different level of utilization for a given principal diagnosis or surgical procedure. The refined system was evaluated with national data from the Medicare program. Estimates of hospital costs and utilization based on refined diagnosis-related groups were more precise than those based on unrefined diagnosis-related groups. This approach to diagnosis-related group refinement does not represent a radical departure from the current diagnosis-related group framework and does not require new data collection efforts. Moreover, a payment system based on the refined model is less affected by the ordering of the diagnoses than under the existing diagnosis-related group system. How the refined diagnosis-related group framework can accommodate future refinements at all levels of the classification scheme is also discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Psychiatric diagnosis in Japan. 2. Reliability of conventional diagnosis and discrepancies with Research Diagnostic Criteria diagnosis.

Twenty Japanese psychiatrists were asked for their conventional diagnoses for each of 29 case vignettes already diagnosed according to Research Diagnostic Criteria. The reliability coefficients of Japanese conventional diagnoses were low; only two categories exceeded the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.7. However, the low reliability was found to be due not to random variations but to the difference of individual psychiatrists in setting boundaries of diagnostic entities though sharing the common prototype for each diagnostic category.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The validity of the diagnosis of depression in general practice: is using criteria for diagnosis as a routine the answer?

BACKGROUND: In general practice, making a diagnosis does not follow the same lines as in secondary care because every new diagnosis is made against 'foreknowledge' and could be coloured by it. This could explain low accordance and differences in diagnoses between primary and secondary care, in particular when mental illness such as depression is concerned. When criteria are used for diagnosis there should be no differences. AIM: To establish the accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria of major depressive disorder when the diagnosis of depression has been made by general practitioners (GPs) for whom coding and using criteria for diagnosis is a daily routine (ICHPPC-2 criteria). METHOD: Ninety-nine general practice patients from four general practices belonging to the Continuous Morbidity Registry (CMR) of the University of Nijmegen in The Netherlands were interviewed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (auto) 12-month version (DSM-IV criteria). Thirty-three patients had a code for depression; 33 patients a code for chronic nervous functional complaints (CNFC); and 33 had no code for mental illness (the depression and CNFC codes were given in the 12 months prior to the interview). Specificity and accordance with the DSM-IV criteria of major depressive disorder (MDD) were calculated with the results from the interviews. RESULTS: Of the 33 general practice depression cases (all matching ICHPPC-2 criteria), 28 matched DSM-IV criteria: 26 for MDD and 2 for dysthymia. No cases of DSM-IV MDD were found in the control group without a code for a mental disorder, and seven out of 33 were found in the control group with the code for CNFC. CONCLUSION: The specificity of diagnosis of depression made by GPs in a continuous morbidity registry and the accordance with DSM-IV criteria are high. Using criteria for diagnosis, which is a trend, could be one of the solutions towards a better diagnosis. As far as the sensitivity is concerned, GPs should not be distracted from using criteria for the diagnosis of depression when a large variety of complaints is presented.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

[Asthma classification by score calculated from clinical findings and examinations. Comparison between clinical diagnosis and score diagnosis].

Asthma classification by clinical symptoms and signs (clinical diagnosis) was compared with the classification by score calculated from clinical findings and examinations (score diagnosis) in 25 patients with bronchial asthma. 1. Ten subjects classified as Ia (simple bronchoconstriction type) by clinical diagnosis were divided into 6 cases with expectoration of less than 49 ml a day and 4 cases with expectoration of between 50 and 99 ml. The level of serum IgE and number of eosinophils in BALF were significantly higher in the latter cases than in the former cases. The cases whose expectoration was from 50 to 99 ml a day were classified as Ib (bronchoconstriction with hypersecretion type) by score diagnosis. 2. The six subjects who were classified as type Ib by clinical diagnosis were also evaluated as type Ib by score diagnosis. 3. Nine of the 10 subjects classified as type II by clinical diagnosis were evaluated as type II by score diagnosis. One case, whose score was under 12 points, was evaluated as questionable type II by score diagnosis.

Adult↗