SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Dentists' perceptions and management of the pain experienced by children during treatment were examined in surveys of 198 American and 230 Finnish dentists. Two pain management areas were studied: communication and the use of anaesthetics and sedation. Neither group of dentists routinely questioned children about pain, but encouraging the child to report pain during treatment was more common; the USA dentists asked about pain more often than the Finnish dentists, whereas the Finnish dentists more often encouraged children to report pain. Finnish dentists were much less likely to use local anaesthetics during restorative treatment of either primary or permanent teeth than USA dentists. Neither group of dentists routinely prescribed nitrous oxide sedation, or premedication, or post-operative pain medications. Regarding the dentists' perceptions of pain experienced by children during dental treatment, neither group rated dental treatment procedures as particularly painful or unpleasant. Most dentists found the pain reports of children credible, yet a sizeable minority (up to 67% of the USA dentists and 21% of the Finnish dentists) did not find them strongly credible. There was little relationship between the dentists' pain management behaviour and their perceptions of the pain experienced by their patients.
A survey which included brief case histories and intraoral photos of four transitional dentitions, including examples of ectopic and delayed eruption, as well as carious lesions, was mailed to a random sample of 2000 general dentists and 1000 pediatric dentists. Radiographic options were listed, from which each dentist was to indicate all films needed for each child's examination. Surveys were returned by 1273 (43%) dentists, including 713 (36%) general dentists and 560 (56%) pediatric dentists. The pediatric dentists took significantly more diagnostic radiographs than did the general dentists for each of the four transitional dentition cases. Pediatric dentists were more likely than the general dentists to take panoramic films and combinations which included panoramic films, bite-wing radiographs and periapical films. The most frequently ordered combinations were bite-wing radiographs plus panoramic films and bite-wing radiographs plus anterior periapical films. General dentists recommended bite-wing radiographs films only more frequently than did pediatric dentists. In view of the results of this study and the USDHHS guidelines for radiographic examinations, (1987) education must be provided for both general dentists and pediatric dentists regarding appropriate radiographic examinations for transitional dentition patients.
The aim was to study whether subgroups of lay people and dentists differ in their opinions about the ideal dentist and the ideal patient. This was done by analyzing further a data set containing responses on single statements regarding different aspects of dentist-patient relationship that have been reported previously. A questionnaire containing 124 five-class Likert scale statements and questions about the background of the respondents was sent in November 1988 to a representative sample of lay people and to all dentists in Kuopio and North Karelia Provinces in Finland. To extract areas of interdependence for both dentists and patients, factor analyses were applied to the data and factor scores were calculated for further analyses. Differences in the opinions were studied between dentists and patients as well as among subgroups of patients and dentists. The power of the selected factors in discriminating between dentists and patients, and different subgroups of dentists and patients was evaluated by means of logistic regression analyses. The expectations of dentists and patients were similar about the ideal patient. About the ideal dentist, dentists and patients agreed only on one of the five factors, i.e. communicativeness and informativeness. Differences, especially in the opinions about the ideal patient, were found between following subgroups of patients: non-regular and regular attenders, males and females, old and young, patients with low and high education and different occupational status; and between private practitioners and community dentists.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess which variables are associated with Iowa general dentists' referral of children younger than age 3 to pediatric dentists. METHODS: A survey was mailed to all Iowa general dentists (N=1,089). Respondents were asked how likely (never, sometimes, often, always) they were to refer children younger than age 3 to pediatric dentists in the past 12 months. Associations between referral patterns with practice, dentists,' and patients' characteristics were determined. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 65%. Nearly 50% of all dentists reported often or always referring children younger than age 3. Dentists who referred were more likely to be males and to have been in practice longer. Dentists who perceived that they had not received adequate exposure to preschool children younger than age 3 in dental school were more likely to refer. Dentists with smaller percentages of children within their practices were more likely to refer. Dentists most often referred children who were uncooperative, had severe decay, or had special needs. CONCLUSIONS: About one half of Iowa's general dentists refer children younger than age 3 to a pediatric dentist. Initiatives need to be undertaken to address dentists' reluctance to care for young children.
The aims of the study were to determine what according to lay people and dentists in the Kuopio and North Karelia provinces of Finland characterizes the ideal dentist and the ideal patient and to develop a proper questionnaire for further studies in dentist-patient relationship. A questionnaire containing 124, five-class Likert scale statements and questions about background variables was sent in November 1988 to a representative sample of lay people and to all dentists in these regions. To extract areas of preferences for both dentists and patients, and to select questions for further studies on dentist-patient relationship, factor analysis was applied to the data. Similarities and differences in the opinions of dentists and patients were also evaluated by single statements. According to factor analyses, the perceptions of dentists and patients were in general similar, communicativeness and informativeness being the most important traits of dentists and activeness, compliance and motivation being the most important traits of patients. However, differences were also found which should be taken into consideration when teaching dentists about the dentist-patient relationship. Based on the current results we also propose a compact questionnaire to be used in further studies.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about general dentists' referral patterns. The authors explored the practice, dentist and patient characteristics associated with general dentists' likelihood of referring children aged 3 to 5 years to pediatric dentists. METHODS: The authors sent all Iowa general dentists (N = 1,089) a 25-item questionnaire regarding the referral of children in their practices. The authors merged the resulting information with an existing database (Iowa Dentist Tracking System) to create the dataset. A total of 65.4 percent of the dentists (712) participated. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that an increase in the percentage of children in the practice decreased the likelihood of the dentist's referring the children (odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.90 to 0.96). Practices with more than 5 percent of patients with public insurance were more likely to refer children (OR = 1.96, 95 percent CI = 1.26 to 3.06), as were dentists with additional training beyond dental school (OR = 1.69, 95 percent CI = 1.06 to 2.69). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that both practice and dentist characteristics are associated with the likelihood of making referals; however, there needs to be further study on general dentists' referral decisions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: As the characteristics of the dental work force evolve, there is a need to study referral patterns and the influence they have on work force policy, patient accessibility and educational curriculum.
Female unpromoted general practice dentists (GPDs) in the Public Dental Health Service (PDHS) constitute about one fourth of all working dentists in Sweden. Unpromoted means that the position is without managerial functions. According to many reports, they have a problematic psychosocial work situation. THIS THESIS AIMED TO: Describe the perceived health for these GPDs, in comparison with others with a similar work situation. Analyse their sense of support in comparison with others. Describe how they perceived "good work", i.e. both the healthy and socially responsible work, and whether there was a difference between their ideal and their reality. Analyse patterns in two aspects - the moral and the career aspects - of "good work" for dentists. In zooo, questionnaires were sent to all female unpromoted GPDs in the PDHS in a region of Sweden. The response rate was 94%. RESULTS: The dentists felt unwell, worse than other compared groups. There was little support from the management. There was little inter-colleague contact. There was no cross-sectional assciation between collegial neworks and support, but the qualitative investigation showed that collegial networks were perceived as positive. There was a great difference between ideal and reality concerning good work. The dentists felt a lack of influence, and this was the greatest difference of all. Three components of good work - "moral values and skill discretion", "career development" and "work environment" were found. The dentists emphasized the moral basis of their work, confirming the character of dentistry as primarily human service work. IN CONCLUSION: There were serious work environmental problems among these dentists. The dentists felt unwell and felt a great lack of influence on important decisions. There was little inter-colleague contact, but collegial networks were perceived as positive. There was little support from the management, indicating a clear weakness in the relations between employers and female unpromoted GPDs in the PDHS. Three components of good work were found, where the moral component was the most important but it also showed the greatest difference between ideal and reality. Thus, the dentists emphasized the moral basis of their work, confirming the character of dentistry as primarily human service work and not industrial work. The dentists with the highest level of commitment perceived the largest differences. The PDHS organization has therefore failed to convince or engage those whom it ought to engage, i.e. those with the greatest commitment. The way to improve the female unpromoted GPDs' work situation would be through increased influence and support, bridging the gap between ideal and reality.
A survey which included brief case histories and intraoral photos of four primary dentitions ranging from healthy to severely carious was mailed to a random sample of 2000 general dentists and 1000 pediatric dentists. Radiographic options were listed, from which the dentist was to indicate all films needed for each child's examination. Surveys were received from 1273 (43%) dentists, including 713 (36%) general dentists and 560 (56%) pediatric dentists. The pediatric dentists recommended significantly more diagnostic radiographs than did the general dentists across all four primary dentition cases. This trend was apparent in the absence of clinically visible caries. When radiographs were recommended, bite-wing radiographs were the most frequently ordered films. The most frequently ordered combination among all respondents was bite-wing radiographs plus anterior periapical films. The results suggest that, frequently, neither general dentists nor pediatric dentists prescribe radiographs for the primary dentition patient that conform to the USDHHS guidelines for radiographic examination (1987).
A survey which included a series of demographic questions, a brief clinical history, and pictures of eight radiographs was mailed to 2000 general dentists and 1000 pediatric dentists. Usable responses were received from 1369 (45%) dentists--765 (38%) general dentists, and 604 (60%) pediatric dentists. The dentists were asked to select the optimal treatment for a specified tooth in each radiograph. The results of this survey indicate that there were differences in the treatment recommendations of general and pediatric dentists. Whether or not pulp therapy was recommended, general dentists frequently recommended restoring teeth with amalgam. Pediatric dentists more frequently recommended restoring primary teeth with stainless steel crowns. There were differences in treatment recommendations within each group of practitioners, as well as between the two groups.
This study relates perceived dentist behaviors to anxiety in patients during treatment and to satisfaction during the dental visit. The sample consisted of 231 adult patients, 107 men and 124 women, at a public hospital dental clinic. Immediately after treatment, patients were asked to respond to a list of 21 dentist behaviors thought to be associated with positive dentist-patient interaction. Criterion measures obtained were ratings of anxiety by patients during treatment and measures from the DVSS. None of the dentist behaviors was related to anxiety in patients in a way that would suggest that dentist behavior either reduced or increased anxiety. DAS scores obtained before treatment were the best predictor of anxiety in patients during treatment. Most of the dentist behaviors were significantly related to satisfaction in patients. Stepwise multiple regression analyses using DVSS scores as criterion variables indicated that those variables contributing most to satisfaction in patients were indicative of dentist communication that was accepting and caring. Anxiety in patients during treatment also was an important negative predictor of satisfaction. The results indicate that the dentist behaviors explored in this study were associated with satisfaction in patients, but were not clearly related to anxiety reduction.
Dentists have a particular risk of acquiring viral hepatitis because of their close contact with blood and saliva during dental manipulations--especially as the majority of dentists do not use gloves during work and often have small cuts and abrasions on their hands. On the other hand personnel in the dentist's office offers several potential modes of parenteral and oral-intestinal transmission of hepatitis. In order to find out the risk of dentists exposing themselves to hepatitis-infection (especially hepatitis B-infection) we performed a questionnaire-study among practicing dentists all over Oberbayern. 858 replies were received after distribution of 1030 questionnaires (participation: 83.3%) and could by analyzed. 116 dentists had had a hepatitis during their professional work (13.5%). The frequency of hepatitis among the younger colleagues--who were practicing from 1 to 14 years--was about 5%. The number of hepatitis-infections increased continually up to 33% after 35--39 years of professional activity. In a second study blood samples were taken from 773 dentists and were tested for HB3Ag by radioimmunoassay. Of these 773 blood samples taken 25 (3.5%) were found to be antigen-positive. Compared to the general population the risk of infection is 6- to 30 times higher in dentists. The challenge of hepatitis-virus-infection can at present be met only-and at least in part-by scrupulous attention to prophylactic measures, such as using disposable gloves, needles and syringes and in autoclaving all non-disposable equipment. Besides dental personnel and patients should be screened at regular intervals for the presence of HBsAG.
A convenience sample of patients (n = 271) from community health centres and private clinics in different parts of Finland were recruited for this study through their dental clinic. Equal numbers of regular and irregular clients were invited to participate. Before the treatment procedure, each patient filled out a questionnaire with forty Likertian statements dealing with their expectations of an ideal dentist, and nine about their own background, i.e., age, sex, regularity of dental visits. basic and professional education, and occupation. After the treatment subjects described their treating dentists' behaviour using similar statements. In the analyses two approaches were applied. First, factor analyses with orthogonal varimax rotation were conducted with the data about the ideal and actual dentist. For the ideal dentist, five factors were extracted: 1) mutual communication, 2) fair support, 3) personal appearance, 4) preferred type of practice, and 5) blaming; and for the actual dentist 5 factors were extracted: 1) mutual communication, 2) pain control, 3) fair support, 4) personal appearance, and 5) preferred type of practice. The factor structures were found to be similar when they were compared with transformation analysis. This justified the second analysis where the differences between the ideal and the actual factor scores were compared. The expectations of the patients were met on all the other dentist characteristics except mutual communication and fair support. There were not many differences between subgroups of patients. In further studies, other background variables, such as previous experiences of the patients, should be considered in order to obtain a more complete explanation of the variation in satisfaction. More attention should be paid to the communication skills of the dentists.
This study relates perceived dentist behaviors to anxiety reduction in patients during treatment, and to satisfaction with the dental visit. The sample consisted of 250 adult patients, 110 men and 140 women, at two outpatient hospital dental clinics. Immediately after treatment, patients were asked to respond to a list of 25 dentist behaviors thought to be associated with positive dentist-patient interaction. Criterion measures obtained by patients were self-ratings of anxiety during treatment and satisfaction measures from the DVSS. Ten behaviors were significantly associated with anxiety reduction. A stepwise multiple regression analysis with anxiety reduction as the dependent variable indicated that to the patient, the dentist's explicit dedication to prevent pain was the most important dentist behavior, with friendliness, working quickly, being calm, and giving moral support, being important auxiliary behaviors. Most of the 25 dentist behaviors studied were associated with patient satisfaction. A stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated that the dentist's empathy and communicativeness were among important correlates of patient satisfaction. An experimental approach to causal analysis of anxiety reducing behaviors needs to be studied.
BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a survey of dentists in Hawaii to assess their knowledge of, perceived readiness for and willingness to respond to bioterrorist (BT) events. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional study design to access a random sample (n = 240) of all licensed dentists residing in the state of Hawaii (N = 1,016), the authors mailed study participants an anonymous survey up to three times during June and July 2004. Knowledge-based questions were taken from accredited Internet-based free continuing medical education offerings. RESULTS: Of 234 deliverable surveys, 133 were returned (response rate of 56.8 percent). Only 2.3 percent of respondents reported having received prior BT preparedness training. A total of 14.5 percent felt able to identify and recognize a BT event, and 9.2 percent indicated they were able to respond effectively to a BT attack. A total of 73.8 percent expressed willingness to provide assistance to the state in the event of a BT attack. Dentists scored a mean of 62 percent correct (5.6 of nine questions) on the objective knowledge-based questions. CONCLUSIONS: A low prevalence of prior training coupled with a high degree of willingness to provide assistance indicates the need for additional BT preparedness training. This should be provided as continuing education offerings to practicing dentists and incorporated into the dental school curriculum. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists have the basic knowledge and experience to perform a number of key roles in a BT event; however, additional training must be provided to develop BT preparedness competencies.
The aim of this questionnaire study was to investigate dentists' assessment of and the decision making process in a clinical situation with unopposed molar teeth. The questionnaire comprised, besides questions about the dentist's background, a presentation of a clinical situation with a 42-year old male patient who just had lost the left mandibular molars (teeth 36 and 37). A series of questions was provided with multiple choice answers regarding what most probably would occur with the unopposed maxillary molars within a 10-year period, what treatment to propose in such a situation, and indications for the proposed treatment. The questionnaire was sent to a randomly selected group of active members of the Göteborg Dental Society. Two hundred completed questionnaires were returned (response rate 72.5%). The great majority (85%) suggested that marked overeruption of the unopposed molars would occur, whereas 13% believed in minor changes. Almost half of the respondents (47%) proposed to wait and see before any treatment was started, whereas the remaining dentists wanted to perform some therapy as soon as possible or within a specified period of time. The most commonly suggested indications for treatment were risk for overeruption (79%), risk for impaired masticatory function (54%), and risk for development of TMD (50%). Differences in answers were found between female and male dentists, between specialists and general practitioners, and with respect to year of graduation. Most dentists believed that overeruption would occur in spite of the limited knowledge of what will happen to unopposed teeth.
The great Amalgam debate is also taking place in Flanders (Belgium). Mercury amalgam has been used for dental fillings since the last century. Over that time, questions have occasionally been raised with regard to its safety (mercury vapour given off by the amalgam fillings and the possible dangers that these could cause to the patient and the dentist) and with regard to the ecological impact of amalgam waste. Some materials used to treat dental patients endanger the environment. The most important polluting materials are the heavy metals, in particular mercury. This study investigated the answers to the following research questions: What is the total volume of amalgam that is used in Flemish dentistry and what part ended up in the household waste? How do Flemish dentists manage (store and dispose of) their dental amalgam waste? Are Flemish dentists using any alternatives (amalgam separators or alternative materials for dental fillings) for amalgam? A randomly selected group of 500 dentists working in the Flemish part of Belgium was invited to answer a mail questionnaire. A total of 373 dentists responded (response rate 74.6%), providing a representative sample. Of the 5000 kg amalgam being used in one year in Flemish dentistry, about 1.200 kg is discharged either into the sewage or into the household waste. Furthermore, a supplementary 1.900 kg amalgam (extracted teeth with amalgam fillings or bored out amalgam fillings) is also being discharged either into the sewage or into the household waste. Although dental amalgam is the restorative material most used in Flanders, composite materials are becoming more widely used. Only 5% of the respondents were using an amalgam separator.