Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cyclophosphamide”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Early Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel Versus an Anthracycline-Free Regimen With Docetaxel, Cyclophosphamide-Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains an important side effect despite new antiemetic drugs. This study tried to understand the occurrence of CINV in patients receiving two different chemotherapy regimens. As part of the randomized controlled clinical trial SUCCESS C (NCT00847444), 1582 of the 3463 patients completed CINV diaries. Patients were randomized to receive either chemotherapy with FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) or TC (docetaxel, cyclophosphamide). CINV was evaluated hourly using a specially designed questionnaire. Endpoints of the study were complete response (no emesis) and total control (no nausea and no emesis) and were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses over three chemotherapy cycles. Eight hundred fourteen patients received FEC and 768 received TC; patients and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. Patients receiving FEC had significantly more nausea and vomiting, with the main difference in the first 12 h. In the first cycle, the 0-12-h nausea/emesis-free rates were 70%/41% for FEC and 91/76% for TC. By 24 h after chemotherapy, the rates were 65%/33% (FEC) and 85%/60% (TC). The differences were similar in cycles 2 and 3. The detailed analysis of CINV in the study is unique and paves the way for modern CINV analysis of new therapeutics such as antibody-drug conjugates.

Adult

From human papillomavirus (HPV) infection to HPV-associated cancers in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The current cervix-focused screening paradigm in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may underestimate extra-cervical anogenital cancer risk. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and HPV-associated cancers in SLE patients. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed (2010), Embase (2010), and Cochrane Library (2010) to August 8, 2025. Odds Ratios (ORs) and Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIRs) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were calculated. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251122192). RESULTS: SLE was associated with significantly increased odds of HPV infection (OR = 4.12, 95% CI 2.03, 8.32). We further assessed the risk of HPV-associated malignancies in SLE patients. SLE patients exhibited substantially elevated risks across multiple HPV-associated cancers (SIR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.51, 2.38). The risk of cervical cancer was more than doubled (SIR = 2.25, 95% CI 1.75, 2.89). Notably, even higher risks were observed for extra-cervical anogenital cancers, namely vulvar/vaginal cancers (SIR = 5.60, 95% CI 3.71, 8.43). CONCLUSIONS: SLE is associated with elevated risks of HPV infection and a broad spectrum of HPV-associated cancers. Subgroup analyses suggested that cyclophosphamide use, multiple sexual partners, and Asian populations may constitute higher-risk subgroups. These findings highlight the need for additional prospective evidence to better characterize HPV-associated cancer risks in SLE patients.

Humans

Cerebrovascular involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease: a case report and systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial perivascular/vascular infiltrations and stenoses related to Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), often associated with ischemic events, are rarely documented. This study aims to characterize intracranial perivascular/vascular infiltrations and stenoses. METHODS: We first report a new case of strokes revealing ECD with intracranial arterial involvement. We then searched all English- and French-language publications from database inception to November 2025 across 12 different search interfaces, including grey literature sources. Vascular involvement was defined by the presence of intracranial perivascular/vascular infiltrations and stenosis on imaging and/or histopathological evidence of small-vessel involvement. Cases with intracranial nodules or masses abutting vessels but without clear longitudinal perivascular infiltration were excluded. RESULTS: We present a case of recurrent strokes with intracranial vertebral and basilar artery wall stenosis, and aortitis. Initially diagnosed as giant cell arteritis, the patient was treated with corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide followed by methotrexate, but relapsed. The identification of tibial osteosclerosis led to the diagnosis of ECD, with a favorable response to anakinra. Twelve relevant articles were retrieved, in addition to our own case. Most patients exhibited focal cerebrovascular signs (11/13) and associated parenchymal involvement (11/13). Intracranial perivascular/vascular infiltrations and stenoses involved the carotid arteries (7/13), the vertebrobasilar arteries (1/13), or both territories (4/13). Aorta was involved in 8/12 cases. Among the nine patients with available follow-up data, five had poor overall or neurovascular outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial perivascular/vascular infiltrations and stenoses, which leads to recurrent focal ischemic events, represents a likely underdiagnosed CNS pattern in ECD, referred to as "cerebrovascular ECD", which worsens overall prognosis. Vascular imaging should be included in brain MRI protocols for patients with ECD, given the overlap with parenchymal involvement.

Humans

A novel neoadjuvant immunotherapy confers improved overall survival in oral cancer patients with low tumor PD-L1 expression The IT-MATTERS Clinical trial - Prognostic role of tumor PD-L1 expression.

OBJECTIVE: Five-year overall survival (OS) remains&#xa0;<&#xa0;50% for patients with resectable, locally advanced (LA) primary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and soft palate, receiving current standard of care (SOC). The aim of our study was to examine neoadjuvant Leukocyte Interleukin Injection (LI) with CIZ (intravenous low dose cyclophosphamide, indomethacin and zinc multivitamins) effect on OS, in low-risk (LR) OSCC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a randomized, controlled Phase 3 trial, treatment-na&#xef;ve locally advanced patients, with stage III/IVa OSCC and soft-palate cancer, had surgical tumor samples assessed for pre-defined thresholds of PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS). OS was analyzed using proportional hazard models for LI&#xa0;+&#xa0;CIZ&#xa0;+&#xa0;SOC vs SOC, in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. RESULTS: OS was superior in low risk (LR) patients receiving LI&#xa0;+&#xa0;CIZ&#xa0;+&#xa0;SOC compared to SOC; OS advantage hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0569 (without selecting for N0, PD-L1 TPS&#xa0;<&#xa0;10%), and the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) lifetable achieved significance (log rank p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0340) favoring LI&#xa0;+&#xa0;CIZ&#xa0;+&#xa0;SOC vs SOC. Applying the selection criteria (cN0 and TPS&#xa0;<&#xa0;10%) to ITT, OS reached HR 0.34p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0012, Kaplan-Meier log rank p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0015. The ITT LR cohort (cN0 and TPS&#xa0;<&#xa0;10%) achieved a HR 0.26 (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0023), Kaplan-Meier log rank p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0013, supported by progression free survival (PFS) HR 0.43, p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0178, Kaplan-Meier log rank p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0431, with 32% absolute survival advantage over control at 60&#xa0;months. CONCLUSIONS: Significant OS prolongation was observed in ITT population for LI&#xa0;+&#xa0;CIZ&#xa0;+&#xa0;SOC vs SOC, in LR and in ITT LR cN0, PD-L1TPS&#xa0;<&#xa0;10% cohort having locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma tumors in oral cavity/soft-palate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01265849; EudraCT (Identifier: 2010-019952-35).

Humans