Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cranial Sutures”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1993

Tissue interactions with underlying dura mater inhibit osseous obliteration of developing cranial sutures.

Cranial sutures play a critical role in calvarial morphogenesis, serving as growth centers during skull development. Both biomechanical tensile forces originating in the cranial base and biochemical factors present in dura mater have been postulated as determinants of suture morphogenesis and patency. A rat transplant model free of the putative biomechanical influence of the dura and cranial base was used to investigate the role of the dura mater in both the initial morphogenesis and maintenance of sutures during skull growth. Day 19 fetal presumptive (F19) and day 1 neonatal differentiated (N1) coronal sutures, including associated frontal and parietal bones, were transplanted with or without underlying dura mater to the center of adult parietal bones. After 1, 2, and 3 weeks, transplanted tissues were examined histologically and histomorphometrically to determine whether sutures formed and whether they were obliterated by ossification in the absence of dura mater. Both F19 and N1 sutures remained patent for 2 weeks either in the presence or the absence of transplant dura mater. However, at 3 weeks, in the absence of transplant dura mater, sutures were obliterated by bone, while in the presence of dura mater sutures resisted ossification, demonstrating an essential requirement for interactions with the transplant dura mater in maintaining functional sutures. Both F19 and N1 transplants showed comparable bone growth (cross-sectional surface area), regardless of the presence of transplant dura mater. These experiments suggest that tissue interactions of a biochemical nature, rather than biomechanical forces generated through the cranial base, are required to maintain the suture as a non-ossified growth center. Furthermore, while the presence of dura mater was essential for maintenance of suture patency, fetal dura mater was not required for initial suture formation.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Sox9 neural crest determinant gene controls patterning and closure of the posterior frontal cranial suture.

Cranial suture development involves a complex interaction of genes and tissues derived from neural crest cells (NCC) and paraxial mesoderm. In mice, the posterior frontal (PF) suture closes during the first month of life while other sutures remain patent throughout the life of the animal. Given the unique NCC origin of PF suture complex (analogous to metopic suture in humans), we performed quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry to study the expression pattern of the NCC determinant gene Sox9 and select markers of extracellular matrix. Our results indicated a unique up-regulated expression of Sox9, a regulator of chondrogenesis, during initiation of PF suture closure, along with the expression of specific cartilage markers (Type II Collagen and Type X Collagen), as well as cartilage tissue formation in the PF suture. This process was followed by expression of bone markers (Type I Collagen and Osteocalcin), suggesting endochondral ossification. Moreover, we studied the effect of haploinsufficiency of the NCC determinant gene Sox9 in the NCC derived PF suture complex. A decrease in dosage of Sox9 by haploinsufficiency in NCC-derived tissues resulted in delayed PF suture closure. These results demonstrate a unique development of the PF suture complex and the role of Sox9 as an important contributor to timely and proper closure of the PF suture through endochondral ossification.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Studies in cranial suture biology: in vitro cranial suture fusion.

The biology underlying craniosynostosis remains unknown. Previous studies have shown that the underlying dura mater, not the suture itself, signals a suture to fuse. The purpose of this study was to develop an in vitro model for cranial-suture fusion that would still allow for suture-dura interaction, but without the influence of tensional forces transmitted from the cranial base. This was accomplished by demonstrating that the posterior frontal mouse cranial suture, known to be the only cranial suture that fuses in vivo, fuses when plated with its dura in an organ-culture system. In such an organ-culture system, the sutures are free from both the influence of dural forces transmitted from the cranial base and from hormonal influences only available in a perfused system. For the cranial-suture fusion in vitro model study, the sagittal sutures (controls that remain patent in vivo) and posterior frontal sutures (that fuse in vivo) with the underlying dura were excised from 24-day-old euthanized mice, cut into 5 x 4 x 2-mm specimens, and cultured in a chemically defined, serum-free media. One hundred sutures were harvested at the day of sacrifice, then every 2 days thereafter until 30 days in culture, stained with H & E, and analyzed. A subsequent cranial-suture without dura in vitro study was performed in a similar fashion to the first study, but only the calvariae with the posterior frontal or sagittal sutures (without the underlying dura) were cultured. Results from the cranial-suture fusion in vitro model study showed that all sagittal sutures placed in organ culture with the underlying dura remained patent. More importantly, the posterior frontal sutures with the underlying dura, which were plated-down as patent at 24 days of age, demonstrated fusion after various growth periods in organ culture. In vitro posterior frontal mouse-suture fusion occurred in an anterior-to-posterior direction but in a delayed fashion, 4 to 7 days later than in vivo posterior frontal mouse-suture fusion. In contrast, the subsequent cranial-suture without dura in vitro study showed patency of all sutures, including the posterior frontal suture. These data from in vitro experiments indicate that: (1) mouse calvariae, sutures, and the underlying dura survive and grow in organ-culture systems for 30 days; (2) the local dura, free from external influences transmitted from the cranial base and hormones from distant sites, influences the cells of its overlying suture to cause fusion; and (3) without dura influence, all in vitro cranial sutures remained patent. By first identifying the factors involved in dural-suture signaling and then regulating these factors and their receptors, the biologic basis of suture fusion and craniosynostosis may be unraveled and used in the future to manipulate pathologic (premature) suture fusion.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Studies in cranial suture biology: IV. Temporal sequence of posterior frontal cranial suture fusion in the mouse.

The biology underlying normal and premature cranial suture fusion remains unknown. To develop a model for normal cranial suture fusion, the temporal sequence of the posterior frontal cranial suture fusion in the mouse was determined. To do this, all the cranial sutures of three distinct strains of mice (CD-1, CF-1, and C57bl-6) were studied histologically for fusion at sequential time points. Two studies were set up using group A mice (n = 72, all sutures studied) and group B mice (n = 78, only the posterior frontal suture studied, but more precisely along its anatomic length). In the group A cranial suture study, mice were sacrificed starting at newborn age and then every 5 days until age 50 days. In addition, two mature mice (250 days old) from each strain were sacrificed. In all three mouse strains, histologic examinations showed that the anterior frontal, sagittal, coronal, lambdoid, and occipitointerparietal sutures remained patent at up to 50 days of age and were patent in the 250-day mature mice. However, examination of the midpoint of the posterior frontal suture showed patency at 30 days, partial fusion at 35 days, and complete fusion by 40 days. These data prompted the posterior frontal suture fusion study. In the group B posterior frontal suture fusion study, mice were sacrificed at age 23 days and then every 2 days until 47 days of age. The anterior, midpoint, and posterior aspects of the posterior frontal suture were examined: The anterior aspect fused between 25 and 29 days; the midpoint fused between 31 and 37 days; and the posterior aspect fused between 39 and 45 days. These data indicate that fusion of the posterior frontal cranial suture in the mouse proceeds in a defined temporal sequence from an anterior to posterior direction in three distinct strains of mice, while in the same mice all other cranial sutures remain patent. By describing and understanding the fusion of the normal posterior frontal suture, a biologic basis of normal suture development and fusion can be established and used as a comparison for murine cranial sutures altered surgically, biochemically (with growth factors), or genetically (with craniosynostotic phenotypes).

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Studies in cranial suture biology: part II. Role of the dura in cranial suture fusion.

The biology underlying normal and premature cranial suture fusion remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of the dura mater in cranial suture fusion. In the Sprague Dawley rat model, the posterior frontal cranial suture fuses between 10 and 20 days of postnatal life. The effect of separating the posterior frontal cranial suture from its underlying dura mater with an intervening silastic sheet was studied. Sixty rat pups, age 8 days, were divided into four groups of 15. Group A served as unoperated controls. Group B, the experimental group, underwent craniotomy, dural elevation, and insertion of a silicone sheet between the posterior frontal cranial suture and the underlying dura. Two operative sham groups were included. Group C underwent craniotomy and dural deflection only. Group D underwent craniotomy alone without dural deflection. The rats were sacrificed at 15, 22, and 30 days of age. The results showed that the unoperated animals (group A) demonstrated normal initiation of suture fusion at 15 days and complete fusion by 22 days. Group B animals, with silicone sheet barriers placed, showed persistent patency of sutures at 22 days. Initiation of suture fusion was delayed until 30 days. Sham group C, animals with craniotomy and dural deflection, showed that initiation of fusion was delayed until 22 days with complete fusion by 30 days of age. Sham group D, craniotomy alone, had the same normal temporal sequence of suture fusion as the unoperated control group A. These data indicate that normal cranial suture fusion is delayed when the suture-dural interaction is interrupted by a surgically place barrier or by simple dural deflection. Furthermore, interaction between the dura and the overlying suture appears to direct suture fusion.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Studies in cranial suture biology: regional dura mater determines in vitro cranial suture fusion.

Craniosynostosis results in alterations in craniofacial growth that create cosmetic abnormalities and functional deficits, yet the biology underlying cranial suture fusion remains unknown. The purpose of the present study was to show that regional dura mater can induce suture fusion while in an organ culture system in cranial sutures programmed to remain patient. To accomplish this, we studied mouse cranial sutures, since in this model the posterior frontal suture (analogous to the human metopic suture) fuses in both in vivo and in vitro environments while all other sutures remain patent. We demonstrated that when mouse sagittal sutures (programmed to remain patent) were rotated or translocated to overlie the posterior frontal dura then grown in organ culture systems, suture fusion occurred. Twenty-four-day-old CD-1 mice (time when the posterior frontal suture was patent) were divided into three groups of 50 (n = 165: three groups of 50 cultured and three groups of 5 uncultured controls). Group A (unrotated control group) was characterized by a strip of posterior frontal and sagittal suture with underlying dural tissue grown in organ culture systems for up to 30 days and resulted in persistent patency of the sagittal suture and fusion of the posterior frontal suture in an anterior-to-posterior direction. Group B (rotated experimental group) was characterized by 180-degree suture rotation while in vitro and resulted in patency of the posterior frontal suture over the sagittal dura and fusion of the sagittal suture over the posterior frontal dura in a posterior-to-anterior suture direction. Group C (translocated experimental group) was characterized by translocation or shifting of sutures while in vitro and resulted in patency of the posterior frontal suture over the sagittal dura and fusion of the sagittal suture over the posterior frontal dura in an anterior-to-posterior suture direction. These data from the in vitro rotation and translocation experiments indicate that the "regional" posterior frontal dura determined in vitro cranial suture fusion. Molecular mechanisms behind this process are thought to involve inductive tissue interactions of the dural cells with the suture cells by means of growth factor-mediated signal pathways.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Erk pathway and activator protein 1 play crucial roles in FGF2-stimulated premature cranial suture closure.

Cranial sutures are an important growth center of the cranial bones, and the suture space must be maintained to permit the cranial adjustments needed to accommodate brain growth. Craniosynostosis, characterized by premature suture closure, mainly results from mutations that generate constitutively active fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors. FGF signaling, thus, is responsible for the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis. Even though FGF activates many different signaling pathways, the one involved in premature suture closure has not been defined. We observed that placing FGF2-soaked bead on the osteogenic fronts of cultured mouse calvaria accelerates cranial suture closure and strongly induces the expression of osteopontin, an early marker of differentiated osteoblasts. FGF2 treatment also induced fos and jun mRNAs and later increased the nuclear levels of activator protein 1 (AP1). FGF2 stimulates the expression of osteopontin by inducing expression of AP1, which then binds to its response element in the osteopontin promoter. Blocking of the Erk pathway by PD98059 suppressed the AP1 and osteopontin expression stimulated by FGF2. Coincidently, blocking of the Erk pathway also significantly retarded FGF2-accelerated cranial suture closure. Thus, the Erk pathway mediates FGF/FGF receptor-stimulated cranial suture closure, probably by stimulating synthesis of AP1 that then stimulates the differentiation of osteoblasts.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed1997

Studies in cranial suture biology: Part I. Increased immunoreactivity for TGF-beta isoforms (beta 1, beta 2, and beta 3) during rat cranial suture fusion.

The mechanisms involved in normal cranial suture development and fusion as well as the pathophysiology of craniosynostosis, a premature fusion of the cranial sutures, are not well understood. Transforming growth factor-beta isoforms (TGF-beta 1, beta 2, and beta 3) are abundant in bone and stimulate calvarial bone formation when injected locally in vivo. To gain insight into the role of these factors in normal growth and development of cranial sutures and the possible etiology of premature cranial suture fusion, we examined the temporal and spatial expression of TGF-beta isoforms during normal cranial suture development in the rat. In the Sprague-Dawley rat, only the posterior frontal cranial suture undergoes fusion between 12 and 22 days of age, while all other cranial sutures remain patent. Therefore, immunohistochemical analysis of the fusing posterior frontal suture was compared with the patent sagittal suture at multiple time points from the fetus through adult. Whereas the intensity of immunostaining was the same in the posterior frontal and sagittal sutures in the fetal rat, there was increased immunoreactivity for TGF-beta isoforms in the actively fusing posterior frontal suture compared with the patent sagittal suture starting 2 days after birth and continuing until approximately 20 days. There were intensely immunoreactive osteoblasts present during fusion of the posterior frontal suture. In contrast, the patent sagittal suture was only slightly immunoreactive. A differential immunostaining pattern was observed among the TGF-beta isoforms; TGF-beta 2 was the most immunoreactive isoform and was also most strongly associated with osteoblasts adjacent to the dura and the margin of the fusing suture. Since the increased expression of TGF-beta 2 during suture fusion suggested a possible regulatory role, recombinant TGF-beta 2 was added directly to the posterior frontal and sagittal sutures in vivo to determine if suture fusion could be initiated. Exogenously added TGF-beta 2 stimulated fusion of the ectocranial surface of the posterior frontal suture. These data provide evidence for a regulatory role for these growth factors in cranial suture development and fusion. Additionally, the intense immunostaining for TGF-beta 2 in the dura mater underlying the fusing suture supports a role for the dura mater in suture fusion. It is possible that premature or excessive expression of these factors may be involved in the etiopathogenesis of craniosynostosis and that modulation of the growth factor profile at the suture site may have potential therapeutic value.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Studies in cranial suture biology: up-regulation of transforming growth factor-beta1 and basic fibroblast growth factor mRNA correlates with posterior frontal cranial suture fusion in the rat.

The mechanisms involved in normal cranial suture development and fusion as well as in the pathophysiology of craniosyostosis are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the expression of several cytokines--transforming growth factor-beta-1 (TGF-beta1), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and interleukin-6 (IL-6)--during cranial suture fusion. TGF-beta exists in three mammalian isoforms that are abundant in bone and stimulate calvarial bone formation when delivered locally. Other bone growth factors including basic fibroblast growth factor and the interleukins regulate bone growth and are mitogenic for bone marrow cells and osteoblasts. The involvement of growth factors in the pathophysiology of craniosynostosis is supported by recent genetics data linking fibroblast growth factor receptor mutations to syndromal craniosynostoses. In this experimental study, in situ hybridization was used to localize and quantify the gene expression of TGF-beta1, bFGF, and IL-6 during cranial suture fusion. In the Sprague-Dawley rat, the posterior frontal cranial suture normally undergoes fusion between 12 and 22 days of age, whereas all other cranial sutures remain patent. All in situ analyses of fusing posterior frontal sutures were compared with the patent, control, sagittal sutures. Posterior frontal and sagittal sutures, together with underlying dura, were harvested from rats at 8, 12, 16, and 35 days of postnatal life to analyze posterior frontal suture activity before, during, and after fusion. In situ hybridization was performed on frozen sections of these specimens using DNA probes specific for TGF-beta1, bFGF, and IL-6 mRNA. A negative control probe to IL-6 in the sense orientation was also used to validate the procedure. Cells expressing cytokine-specific mRNA were quantified (in cells positive per 10(-1) mm2) and analyzed using the unpaired Student's t test. Areas encompassing the fibrous suture and the surrounding bone plates were analyzed for cellular mRNA activity. IL-6 mRNA expression showed a minimal rise in the posterior frontal suture at days 12 and 16, with an average count of 10 and 6 cells per 10(-1) mm2, respectively. The sagittal suture remained negative for IL-6 mRNA at all time points. TGF-beta1 and bFGF analyses were most interesting, showing marked increases specifically in the posterior frontal suture during the time of active suture fusion. On postnatal day 8, a 1.5-fold increase in posterior frontal suture TGF-beta1 mRNA was found compared with sagittal sutures (p = 0.1890, unpaired Student's t test). This difference was increased 26-fold on day 12 in posterior frontal suture TGF-beta1 expression (p = 0.0005). By day 35, posterior frontal suture TGF-beta1 mRNA had nearly returned to prefusion levels, whereas TGF-beta1 mRNA levels in the sagittal suture remained low. A similar upregulation of bFGF mRNA, peaking at day 12, was observed in posterior frontal but not sagittal sutures (p = 0.0003). Furthermore, both TGF-beta1 and bFGF mRNA samples with intact dura showed an intense dural mRNA expression in the time preceding and during active posterior frontal suture fusion but not in sagittal tissues. Our data demonstrate that TGF-beta1 and bFGF mRNA are up-regulated in cranial suture fusion, possibly signaling in a paracrine fashion from dura to suture. TGF-beta1 and bFGF gene expression were dramatically increased both in and surrounding the actively fusing suture and followed the direction of fusion from endocranial to epicranial. These experimental data on bone growth factors support the recent human genetics data linking growth factor/fibroblast growth factor receptor deletions to syndromal craniosynostoses. The ultimate aim of these studies is to understand the underlying mechanisms regulating suture growth, development, and fusion so surgeons may one day manipulate the biology of premature cranial suture fusion.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Increased IGF-I and IGF-II mRNA and IGF-I peptide in fusing rat cranial sutures suggest evidence for a paracrine role of insulin-like growth factors in suture fusion.

Premature cranial suture fusion, or craniosynostosis, can result in gross aberrations of craniofacial growth. The biology underlying cranial suture fusion remains poorly understood. Previous studies of the Sprague-Dawley rat posterior frontal suture, which fuses at between 12 and 20 days, have suggested that the regional dura mater beneath the cranial suture directs the overlying suture's fusion. To address the dura-suture paracrine signaling that results in osteogenic differentiation and suture fusion, the authors investigated the possible role of insulin-like growth factors (IGF) I and II. The authors studied the temporal and spatial patterns of the expression of IGF-I and IGF-II mRNA and IGF-I peptide and osteocalcin (bone morphogenetic protein-4) protein in fusing posterior frontal rat sutures, and they compared them with patent coronal (control) sutures. Ten Sprague-Dawley rats were studied at the following time points: 16, 18, and 20 days of gestation and 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 50, and 80 days after birth (n = 110). Posterior frontal and coronal (patent, control) sutures were analyzed for IGF-I and IGF-II mRNA expression by in situ hybridization by using 35S-labeled IGF-I and IGF-II antisense riboprobes. Levels of IGF-I and IGF-II mRNA were quantified by counting the number of autoradiograph signals per cell. IGF-I and osteocalcin immunoreactivity were identified by avidin-biotin peroxidase immunohistochemistry. IGF-I and IGF-II mRNA were expressed in dural cells beneath fusing sutures, and the relative mRNA abundance increased between 2 and 10 days before initiation of fusion. Subsequently, IGF-I and IGF-II mRNA were detected in the suture connective tissue cells at 15 and 20 days during the time of active fusion. In contrast, within large osteoblasts of the osteogenic front, the expression of IGF-I and IGF-II mRNA was minimal. However, IGF-I peptide and osteocalcin protein were intensely immunoreactive within these osteoblasts at 15 days (during the period of suture fusion). These data suggest that the dura-suture interaction may be signaled in a paracrine fashion by dura-derived growth factors, such as IGF-I and IGF-II. These peptides, in turn, stimulate nearby osteoblasts to produce bone-promoting growth factors, such as osteocalcin.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Regulation of cranial suture morphogenesis.

The cranial sutures are the primary sites of bone formation during skull growth. Morphogenesis and phenotypic maintenance of the cranial sutures are regulated by tissue interactions, especially those with the underlying dura mater. Removal of the dura mater in fetuses causes abnormal suture development and premature suture obliteration. The dura mater interacts with overlying tissues of the cranial vault by providing: (1) intercellular signals, (2) mechanical signals and (3) cells, which undergo transformation and migrate to the suture. The intercellular signaling governing suture development employs the fibroblast growth factors (FGFs). In rats during formation of the sutures in the fetus, FGF-1 is localized mainly in the dura mater, while other FGFs are expressed in the overlying tissues. By birth, FGF-2 largely replaces FGF-1 in the dura mater. FGFs present in the calvaria bind either the IIIb or IIIc mRNA splice variants of the FGF receptors (FGFRs) 1, 2, or 3. Monoclonal antibodies to the b variant of FGFR2 were used to determine the distribution of FGFR2IIIb during suture development and its extracellular localization. FGFR2IIIb is present in association with mature osteoblasts and osteogenic precursor cells of the suture in the fetus. Ectodomains of FGFR2IIIb, the products of proteolytic cleavage of the receptors, were present throughout the extracellular matrix of sutures resisting obliteration (coronal and sagittal), but absent from the core of sutures undergoing normal fusion (posterior intrafrontal). This observation is consistent with a possible mechanism, in which truncated receptors bind FGFs, thus regulating free FGF available to nearby cells. Mechanical signaling in the calvaria results from tensional forces in the dura mater generated during rapid expansion of the neurocranium. Posterior intrafrontal sutures of rats, which fuse between days 16 and 24, were subjected to cyclical tensional forces in vitro. Significant delay in the timing of suture fusion and increases in the expression domains of FGFR1 and 2 were observed, demonstrating the sensitivity of suture patency to mechanical signals and a possible role of the FGF system in mediating such stimuli. Finally, cells of the dura mater beneath the intrafrontal and sagittal sutures were observed to undergo a morphological transformation to a dendritic morphology and migrate into the suture mesenchyme between days 10 and 16 of development. This process may participate in suture and bone morphogenesis and influence the patency of the sutures along the anterior-posterior axis.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Nanostructural and nanomechanical properties of synostosed postnatal human cranial sutures.

Craniosynostosis represents a heterogeneous cluster of congenital disorders and manifests as premature ossification of one or more cranial sutures. Cranial sutures serve to enable calvarial growth and function as joints between skull bones. The mechanical properties of synostosed cranial sutures are of vital importance to their function and yet are poorly understood. The present study was designed to characterize the nanostructural and nanomechanical properties of synostosed postnatal sagittal and metopic sutures. Synostosed postnatal sagittal sutures (n = 5) and metopic sutures (n = 5) were obtained from craniosynostosis patients (aged 9.1 +/- 2.8 months). The synostosed sutural samples were prepared for imaging and indentation on both the endocranial and ectocranial surfaces with the cantilever probe of an atomic force microscopy. Analysis of the nanotopographic images indicated robust variations in sutural surface characteristics with localized peaks and valleys. In 5 x 5 mum scan sizes, the surface roughness of the synostosed metopic suture was significantly greater (223.6 +/- 93.3 nm) than the synostosed sagittal suture (142.9 +/- 80.3 nm) (P < 0.01). The Young's modulus of the synostosed sagittal suture at 0.7 +/- 0.2 MPa was significantly higher than the synostosed metopic suture at 0.5 +/- 0.1 MPa (P < 0.01). These data suggest that various synostosed cranial sutures may have different structural and mechanical characteristics.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed2002

Immunolocalization of urokinase and its receptor in prematurely fused cranial sutures of infants.

In cranial sutural samples derived from five children with premature cranial suture fusion we have performed immunostaining for the urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and urokinase receptor (uPAR). We have found a strong reactivity for cell- or matrix-bound uPA and uPAR in the sutural connective tissue and associated with the osteoblasts and osteocytes lining the calvarial bone. The sutural tissue itself showed a banding with different intensity of urokinase and uPAR staining concerning connective tissue. It is proposed that the components of the plasminogen activating system are involved in tissue turnover of sutural tissue and in sutural growth.

Connective Tissue↗
PubMed2004

In vitro murine posterior frontal suture fate is age-dependent: implications for cranial suture biology.

In CD-1 mice, the posterior frontal suture (analogous to the human metopic suture) fuses while all other cranial sutures remain patent. In an in vitro organ culture model, the authors previously demonstrated that posterior frontal sutures explanted immediately before the onset of suture fusion (at 25 days old) mimic in vivo physiologic fusion. In the first portion of this study, the authors defined how early in development the posterior frontal suture fuses in their tension-free, serum-free organ culture system by serially analyzing posterior frontal suture fusion from calvariae explanted at different stages of postnatal development. Their results revealed a divergence of suture fate leading to abnormal patency or physiologic fusion between the first and second weeks of life, respectively, despite viability and continued growth of the calvarial explants in vitro. From these data, the authors postulated that the gene expression patterns present in the suture complex at the time of explant may determine whether the posterior frontal suture fuses or remains patent in organ culture. Therefore, to elucidate potentially important differences in gene expression within this "window of opportunity," they performed a cDNA microarray analysis on 5-day-old and 15-day-old posterior frontal and sagittal whole suture complexes corresponding to the age ranges for unsuccessful (1 to 7 days old) and successful (14 to 21 days old) in vitro posterior frontal suture fusion. Overall, their microarray results reveal interesting differential expression patterns of candidate genes in different categories, including angiogenic cytokines and mechanosensitive genes potentially important in cranial suture biology.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2004

TGF-beta1, FGF-2, and receptor mRNA expression in suture mesenchyme and dura versus underlying brain in fusing and nonfusing mouse cranial sutures.

Recent studies have supported a functional role for the transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-beta1) and fibro-blast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) signaling cascades in the process of mouse cranial suture fusion. TGF-beta1 and FGF-2 protein expression have been shown to be elevated in the fusing posterior frontal suture versus the nonfusing sagittal suture. The authors evaluated simultaneous mRNA expression of TGF-beta1 and its R1 receptor and FGF-2 and its R2 receptor during mouse cranial suture fusion. They evaluated the suture mesenchyme-dura complex separately from the underlying brain to determine whether there is tissue-specific biologic activity (i.e., brain versus suture mesenchyme-dura) for each cytokine and receptor. Data were collected from 150 male CD-1 mice studied over five time periods from postnatal days 22 to 45. They utilized reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction as a means to detect TGF-beta1, TGF-beta receptor 1 (TGF-betaR1), FGF-2, and FGF receptor 2 (FGFR2) mRNA expression in mouse cranial tissues, beginning with the period of initiation of posterior frontal cranial suture fusion (postnatal day 22) and extending through completion of posterior frontal suture fusion (postnatal day 45). Expression of FGF-2 was significantly greater in posterior frontal suture mesenchyme and dura compared with sagittal suture mesenchyme and dura during the period of initiation of posterior frontal suture fusion, localizing this cytokine's expression to posterior frontal suture mesenchyme and dura during the process of cranial suture fusion. TGF-beta1 and FGFR2 mRNA expression was found to be up-regulated in posterior frontal suture mesenchyme and dura relative to the underlying brain tissue throughout the study period, whereas TGF-betaR1 and FGF-2 mRNA expression was significantly elevated relative to the underlying brain only at time points corresponding to the initiation of posterior frontal suture fusion (between postnatal days 22 and 31). These results indicate that there is tissue-specific mRNA expression of TGF-beta1, FGF-2, and their receptors between suture mesenchyme and dura and the underlying brain, which correlates with the period of posterior frontal suture fusion in the mouse model. Differences in gene expression between suture mesenchyme and dura relative to the underlying brain may be an important regulator of cranial suture biology. Understanding these differences may eventually help to identify possible targets and time windows by which to most effectively modulate cranial suture fusion.

Actins↗
PubMed2000

The load-displacement characteristics of neonatal rat cranial sutures.

OBJECTIVE: Recently several centers have attempted to distract the craniofacial skeleton in infants with craniosynostosis. To effectively achieve this goal, we must first understand the normal sutural response to tensile forces. The objective of this study was to determine the load-displacement characteristics of neonatal rat sutures. METHODS: Thirty cranial sutures were harvested from 1-week-old Wistar rats (10 each coronal, posterior frontal, and sagittal). The width of the harvested bone-suture-bone construct was standardized to 4 mm. The specimens, kept moist, were mounted fresh and distracted at 10 microm/sec until rupture using a Vitrodyne V1000 universal tester. Standard load-displacement curves were constructed. The stiffness, defined as tensile force/change in suture length, and the ultimate stress, defined as tensile force at suture rupture/cross sectional area, were calculated. RESULTS: These sutures demonstrated classical viscoelastic behavior. During the elastic phase, they elongated approximately 1 microm for every 1 g of force (10(4) N/m). The ultimate tensile stress was approximately 4 MN/m2. The estimated mean elastic modulus was 10 megapascals. The posterior frontal sutures were significantly less stiff than the other two sutures (Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance, p = .0023). The difference in the ultimate stress was also significant (p = .0201). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides data regarding the basic mechanical behavior of neonatal cranial sutures in a mammalian system.

Analysis of Variance↗