Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Counseling--standards”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1989

Sexual counseling standards for the spinal cord-injured.

Spinal cord injury is one of the most prevalent disabilities in the United States today. The disability invariably affects sexual functioning challenging the usual ways one thinks about sexuality. Rehabilitation and development of standards of care for sexual counseling in this population are essential. Outlined in this article are proposed standards of care for sexual counseling of the spinal cord-injured (SCI) client. Theoretical approaches, provision of counseling and nurse-client objectives which support development of these standards are identified. Also included is a discussion of the preparation and role of the nurse in providing sexual counseling.

Persons with Disabilities↗
PubMed1990

A hospital quit-smoking consult service: clinical report and intervention guidelines.

A minimal-contact quit-smoking consult service was established to treat hospital inpatients and outpatients referred for behavioral smoking cessation treatment. Sixty-two consecutively referred patients were evaluated and triaged to one of three standardized quitting protocols: motivational counseling; standard behavioral abstinence counseling; or abstinence counseling plus nicotine fading. Consultations included personalized self-quit materials and planned telephone follow-up to enhance compliance. Triage differentiated patients with different levels of quitting readiness and nicotine dependence. Six months after treatment, 27% of patients had quit smoking (informant-verified). Predictors of quit attempts were shorter smoking history and lower nicotine dependence. Variables predicting cessation or substantial reductions in estimated daily nicotine intake included higher educational level, stronger beliefs in smoking health harms, higher trait anxiety, a greater desire to quit and quitting self-efficacy, and the recall of direct quitting advice from the referring physician. Results compare favorably with those of more intensive treatments with similar patient groups. Recommendations are presented for controlled follow-up research to explore promising findings in this clinical report.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Surveillance, social risk, and symbolism: framing the analysis for research and policy.

Name-based surveillance for HIV, considered alone, is a useful public health measure; its benefits outweigh its direct costs. There is little evidence that name-based surveillance directly deters individuals at risk of HIV from being tested, or exposes them to significant social risks. Yet such surveillance is chronically controversial. Understood in a broader context of the social risks and symbolic politics of HIV, as subjectively experienced by people at risk, this opposition is both rational and instructive. Although often discussed, the social risks of HIV infection are poorly understood. To the extent these risks have been addressed by privacy and antidiscrimination laws, the solution has been less complete than many public health professionals appear to believe: developments in law and policy, including the increasing prevalence of criminal HIV transmission laws and proposed changes in HIV testing and counseling standards, are contextual factors that help explain the opposition to name-based surveillance. Rather than focusing piecemeal on specific "barriers" to testing and care, an appreciation of the surveillance debate in context suggests a positive undertaking in public health policy to provide the conditions of opportunity, information, motivation and confidence that people with HIV need to accept an effective program of early intervention.

Confidentiality↗
PubMed1994

Medicaid program; drug use review program and electronic claims management system for outpatient drug claims--HCFA. Final rule.

This final rule revises some of the regulatory requirements for the drug use review (DUR) program for covered outpatient drugs furnished to recipients under the Medicaid program. The regulatory requirements became effective on January 2, 1993, as a result of an interim final rule with comment period that we published on November 2, 1992. Specifically, these revisions-- Clarify the definitions of overutilization, underutilization, consensus process, peer-reviewed literature, adverse medical result, adverse drug-drug interaction, appropriate and medically necessary, and individual medical history; Change the requirements for licensure of DUR board members, and telephone counseling arrangements for mail order pharmacies; Include non-prescription drugs in the consideration of alteration of therapeutic effect; Require hospitals to give assurances that they have met the requirements of the statute before claiming the hospital exemption from DUR; Specify the issues that State agencies must address when formulating counseling standards; Clarify the bases for DUR board recommendations; Clarify the distinction between DUR and surveillance and utilization review (SUR); and Make certain technical and editorial corrections. The November 1992 interim final rule with comment period incorporated and interpreted certain provisions of section 4401 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗