Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Contraception--beneficial effects”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Oral contraceptive type and functional ovarian cysts.

OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that multiphasic, low-dose monophasic, and high-dose monophasic oral contraceptives share a common protective effect against functional ovarian cysts. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cohort study using the automatic files of Maine Medicaid to assemble a population of 7462 women between the ages of 15 and 44 who were prescribed an oral contraceptive between Jan. 1, 1987, and Dec. 31, 1988. We included as cases 32 women with a principal diagnosis of a functional ovarian cyst confirmed by medical records as being greater than 20 mm in diameter. RESULTS: At comparison with the absence of an oral contraceptive prescription, we observed decreasing rates of functional ovarian cysts among women prescribed multiphasic pills (rate ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.3000 to 2.31), low-dose monophasic pills with less than or equal to 35 micrograms estrogen (rate ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 1.33), and high-dose monophasic pills with greater than 35 micrograms estrogen (rate ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 1.34). CONCLUSIONS: The protective effect of oral contraceptives against functional ovarian cysts reported previously for high-dose monophasic pills may be attenuated with newer pills of lower hormonal potency.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Oral contraceptives and gynecologic cancer: an update for the 1990s.

The most recent statistical evidence confirms a protective effect of oral contraceptive use against ovarian and endometrial cancers. Studies of the association between oral contraceptive use and cervical cancer continue to be hampered by confounding factors; however, results suggest that the overall risk of invasive cervical neoplasia is not increased. Although the association between oral contraceptive use and breast cancer remains controversial, existing data strongly suggest that overall risk of breast cancer is not increased by the use of oral contraceptives. In most candidates for oral contraceptive use, the benefits greatly outweigh the risks.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1992

Selectivity and minimal androgenicity of norgestimate in monophasic and triphasic oral contraceptives.

The contraceptive progestin norgestimate (NGM) has a high affinity for uterine progestin receptors and a lack of affinity for androgen receptors similar to that of natural progesterone. NGM's selectivity results in excellent efficacy, cycle control, and minimal androgenicity when it is combined with ethinyl estradiol (EE). Clinical studies of a monophasic regimen of NGM/EE indicate a positive impact on lipid metabolism, revealing an increase in serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with a concomitant and significant decrease in the low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio. Little impact on carbohydrate metabolism was noted. Serum levels of sex hormone binding globulin, an indicator of androgen-estrogen balance, also increased significantly with NGM/EE in accordance with its low androgenic activity. A significant between-regimen difference in SHBG was seen in a comparison study of NGM/EE and LNG/EE triphasic formulations (a mean rise of 68.6% with NGM/EE vs a decrease of 6.1% with LNG/EE). NGM's lack of estrogenicity was evidenced by unchanged prolactin levels and absence of effect on the coagulation system. In a large study of the monophasic formulation in 59,701 women, some improvement in acne was reported as well as minimal weight gain. An overview of clinical data is provided from United States and European trials as well as some preclinical data relevant to NGM's selectivity.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1992

Reversible contraception for the woman over 35 years of age.

Methods of reversible contraception, oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, and Norplant (systemic progestin-only contraceptive; Wyeth-Ayerst, Radnor, PA), can be used for women over 35 years of age. Oral contraceptive formulations are safe and effective for healthy women up to the age of menopause. Oral contraceptives in women who do not smoke cigarettes do not result in a significant increased risk for cardiovascular disease. The incidence of breast cancer is not increased in women who have used oral contraceptives. A slight increase was found in younger women who had been on oral contraceptives based on a reanalysis of the contraceptive and steroid hormone study of the Centers for Disease Control. A reduction in the incidence of ovarian epithelial neoplasia by 40% was found in three European case-control studies. Two intrauterine devices are currently available on the US market: Paragard (GynoPharma, Somerville, NJ) and Progestasert (Alza Corp., Palo Alto, CA). Both of these provide highly effective contraception. A World Health Organization prospective randomized study found that there was an increase in pelvic inflammatory disease rates in the first 20 days after intrauterine device insertion. The intrauterine device itself did not increase the pelvic inflammatory disease incidence rates. The Norplant system exerts its contraceptive action through ovulation inhibition and alteration of cervical mucus. The major consumer complaint is irregular or prolonged uterine bleeding, which can be controlled by oral estrogen.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Clinical and metabolic considerations of long-term oral contraceptive use.

Newer lower dose formulations are associated with an improved cardiovascular disease risk marker profile, which supports their use for longer periods and among older women. Epidemiologic studies of the newer formulations are limited. Without clinical information, an evaluation of the effects of more recent formulations on metabolic risk markers for cardiovascular disease is useful. In a large cross-sectional study, a reduction in the progestin dose and use of alternative progestins substantially reduced the proportion of oral contraceptive users with values associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. No progression in metabolic changes was found by analyzing the effect of the duration of oral contraceptive use. The user's age interacted positively with the oral contraceptive--induced increase in serum triglyceride levels, but there was no interaction of age with the oral contraceptive's effect on oral glucose tolerance, glucose and insulin responses, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein subfraction 2 cholesterol levels.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1991

Benefits of oral contraception: thirty years' experience.

A brief overview is presented of some benefits derived during 30 years of oral contraceptive use. Many benefits are significant improvements, and those women desiring to use oral contraceptives have benefited indirectly from lowered doses. Benefits include lowered incidence of endometrial and ovarian cancer, reduced cardiovascular risks, and a decreased incidence of rheumatoid arthritis. It is hoped that such an overview may prove useful during counseling of prospective users for whom oral contraceptives are recommended.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

An epidemiologic study of ovarian cancer. Part 11: Oral contraceptive use and menstrual events.

This work was conducted to investigate the potential risk factors which may contribute to the development of ovarian cancer. A retrospective analysis was adopted where 52 ovarian cancer cases and an equal number of a control group were obtained from the Western region of Saudi Arabia. This case-control study confirms that oral contraceptive use protects against the onset of ovarian cancer and that the decrease in the risk of the development of this disease is also directly related to the duration of use. Additionally, the study revealed a positive association between both age at menopause and hot flashes and the relative risk of ovarian cancer. On the contrary, age at menarche and premenstrual tension have been shown in this study to have no role as a risk factor in the development of ovarian cancer.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prevention of hemoperitoneum during ovulation by oral contraceptives in women with type III von Willebrand disease and afibrinogenemia. Case reports.

The follicle ruptures at the time of ovulation and fills with blood, forming a corpus hemorrhagicum. Minor bleeding from the follicle into the abdominal cavity may cause peritoneal irritation and, when it occurs in a patient with a defect of primary hemostasis, hemoperitoneum can occur. Von Willebrand disease and afibrinogenemia are two important bleeding disorders in which both primary hemostasis and coagulation are involved. Bleeding during ovulation is one major clinical complication in women with these disease. We have studied three patients with this hemorrhagic complication. Our data show that oral contraceptives are an effective way to avoid hemoperitoneum.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Risk factors for epithelial ovarian tumours of borderline malignancy.

A case-control study was conducted on 91 cases with histologically-confirmed borderline ovarian tumours and 237 control subjects in hospital for acute non-gynaecological, hormonal or neoplastic disease. Women reporting three or more births, compared to nulliparae, had a relative risk (RR) estimate of 0.6, but this finding was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2-1.4). The risk of borderline tumours increased, although not significantly, with later age at first birth: compared to women reporting first birth at age 24 or before, the RRs were 1.3 and 1.7 in those reporting respectively their first birth at age 25-29 and 30 years or more. No significant relationship emerged between borderline ovarian cancer and age at menarche, menopausal status and lifelong menstrual pattern. Cases tended to report a later age at menopause than controls, but the trend in risk was not statistically significant. Nine cases (9.9%) and 68 controls (24.9%) reported oral contraceptive use: compared with never users the multivariate RR for ever users was 0.3, and the risk dropped with duration of use to 0.2 in users for two years or more (chi 2 (1) trend = 12.70, p less than 0.001). This study provides epidemiological evidence of a pathogenetic continuum between borderline and invasive ovarian tumours.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

The safety of oral contraceptives: epidemiologic insights from the first 30 years.

Because oral contraceptives are used by tens of millions of healthy women, their safety for short-term and long-term use is an important issue that has been examined in a large number of epidemiologic studies. These studies have become more rigorous and have increased in size and analytic sophistication over the years. Although breast cancer remains the most important safety concern, the bulk of recent data suggests that oral contraceptives have no overall impact on a woman's risk of developing this disease. The results are less clear on the risk of cervical cancer and its precursors because of methodologic problems. However, the newer oral contraceptive formulations no longer appear to be associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction or stroke.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed1992

Benefits and risks of oral contraceptive use.

As a general rule, the lowest-dose oral contraceptive should be prescribed that minimizes side effects while maintaining contraceptive protection. A woman who experiences mild side effects should be encouraged to tolerate symptoms for three menstrual cycles before a decision is made to change the prescription. Compliance may also be improved by informing women of the noncontraceptive health benefits of oral contraceptives: less menstrual blood loss and a lower incidence of menorrhagia, irregular bleeding, benign breast disease, endometrial cancer, dysmenorrhea, ovarian cysts or tumors, and salpingitis. Adequate patient education and supportive counseling are key factors in patient satisfaction and hence compliance.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1992

The underrated benefits of oral contraception: consequences of pregnancy and induced abortion in teenagers.

If complications occur within a pregnancy planned and brought to term, they often can be dealt with and accepted. They are even more traumatic when they occur in an unwanted pregnancy that could have been prevented through contraception. Teenagers, because of their physical and psychological immaturity and also because of their social environment, seem to suffer with undue frequency from the complications of induced abortion. Its result, for the teenager, is a handicapped future in comparison to other women. Hence, access to contraception is important for all women, and especially for teenagers, in order to avoid such prejudicial situations. It is important, then, to prescribe oral contraception for its efficacy and its short- and long-term innocuousness. Because of her immaturity, the pregnant teenager is at risk: of spontaneous abortion, pre-eclampsia, anemia, hemorrhage, and prematurity. She is also at risk because of the social difficulties she will be facing. This is particularly true in families from developing countries. From birth, the child is also at risk: of low birth weight for the term, mortality in the first year of life, and all risks linked to abandonment, or education by a third party. In a proportion of 13 to 30% in western countries and in a proportion of 3% in East Asia or in Northwest Africa (Maghreb), induced abortions are a reflection of the following: early sexual activity without contraception even if fertility is still low in very young teenagers, absence of social protection or social independence, refusal of forced marriage, and presence or absence of liberal legislation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Abortion, Induced↗