Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Condom--side effects”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1980

Contraception in the teenager. A comparison of four methods of contraception in adolescent girls.

The continuation rates, side effects and use-effectiveness of four types of contraceptive were studied during a two-year follow-up period in a group of 160 teenage girls of high socioeconomic standing who hd requested contraception advice. The method of contraception was selected by the girls after a discussion of the alternatives. Results showed good rates of continuation among girls selecting oral contraceptives, the intrauterine device (IUD) and condoms. Side effects and complications preclude the widespread use of oral contraceptives and the IUD in adoescents. There were no serious complications with the use of condoms or vaginal foam, but their use-effectiveness was lower than that of the pill or IUD. The condom is a reasonable alternative for motivated girls. The continuation rate was low in the group selecting the foam method and this form of contraception was quickly abandoned.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Use of condoms as contraceptive and disease preventive measures among residents of Jos, northern Nigeria.

The effectiveness, acceptability and protective aspects of condoms as both contraceptive and disease control measures was evaluated in 168 male residents of Jos in Nigeria. They were aged between 15 and 40 years and were attending the Family Planning Clinic of the Jos University Teaching Hospital. The results showed that the majority (87.5%) of our patients were in the 21 to 30 years age group and most of the clients had used condoms for between 1 to 5 years. A good number of our clients (40.5%) used condom because it protects them against venereal disease while others felt it was safe and effective. The Family Planning Clinic was the main source of knowledge of the condom among our clients (42.9%), and the condom was rated as good or excellent by 137 (81.5%) clients. The only side effect of condom usage which featured prominently among our clients was reduced sexual excitement. The results were compared with studies carried out elsewhere. It was concluded that the condom could be an acceptable and effective form of contraception in this population. The users must, however, be highly motivated so as to use it during every act of coitus for optimal efficacy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Choosing condoms.

Condoms for men are currently the most effective of the nonprescription contraceptive methods. They are readily available, simple to use, and relatively inexpensive, and they are not associated with major adverse effects. If used both properly and consistently, condoms can significantly reduce the risk of transmission of HIV and other STDs. The protection offered by the latex condom may be increased by the concurrent use of a vaginal foam or cream containing nonoxynol 9. The practicing pharmacist should know about the variety of condoms available, be able to explain their correct use to maximize effectiveness, and compare condom use with other types of contraceptives. The practitioner should be available to answer patrons' questions and provide counseling on contraceptives and "safe sex" practices.

Choice Behavior↗
PubMed1989

Condoms as a source of latex allergen and cause of contact urticaria.

To examine the occurrence of latex allergen in condoms and to study the symptoms caused by contact with condoms, 46 patients with latex-glove contact urticaria (LGCU) were investigated. 7 (24%) of the 29 patients with a history of condom use had experienced local swelling and/or pruritus during intercourse, confirming that condoms can cause local symptoms in latex allergic subjects. Prick tests performed on 16 different condom brands showed that 4 brands caused positive reactions in 52-67% of patients. The remaining 12 brands were not as allergenic and 1 brand was totally negative on prick testing. 1 highly allergenic condom brand was examined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), which showed similar protein profiles to those detectable in latex gloves and natural rubber. These results show that, in addition to rubber gloves and balloons, condoms should also be considered as possible sources of latex, and that patients with LGCU should be advised to avoid condoms.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Update: immediate and delayed hypersensitivity to natural rubber latex.

Hypersensitivity to natural rubber latex, an ingredient of many medical devices and consumer products, appears to be increasing. Chemical additives induce T-cell mediated type IV delayed reactions while proteins that occur naturally in latex elicit antibody-mediated type I immediate reactions. The latter can be fatal. The clinical manifestations of these reactions, the risk factors for developing latex hypersensitivity, and diagnostic options are reviewed. The only reliable management strategy is allergen avoidance. Therefore, factors that can affect the levels of both type I and type II allergens in products are discussed.

Condoms↗
PubMed1977

Contraception.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Contraception↗