Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Clozapine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Relation of blood counts during clozapine treatment to serum concentrations of clozapine and nor-clozapine.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between serum clozapine and nor-clozapine levels and blood cell counts during clozapine treatment. METHOD: We undertook a prospective longitudinal study of 37 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia treated with clozapine. We obtained informed consent and then determined serum concentrations of clozapine and nor-clozapine weekly. Clozapine was administered daily in divided doses given every 12 hours and adjusted according to clinical guidelines for its use. Samples for serum concentrations were taken at steady state, immediately before the next morning's dose, for 4 to 8 weeks. Complete blood counts (CBC), weight, and vital signs (that is, blood pressure, pulse, and temperature) were also monitored weekly before the morning's dose of clozapine was administered. RESULTS: Analyses of variance showed no significant changes over the 8-week treatment course in the observed mean white blood count (WBC), red blood count (RBC), neutrophils, and lymphocytes counts, or in the hemoglobin and hematocrit. Only a few weak correlations (r < 0.21) were found between these hematological parameters and the measures of serum clozapine and nor-clozapine. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of clozapine-induced hematotoxicity at the therapeutic dosage range is probably not by direct toxicity of clozapine or nor-clozapine to the blood cells or their precursors. The formation of the cytotoxic nitrenium compound from clozapine by neutrophils may be necessary.

Adolescent↗

Discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine in rats trained to discriminate 1.25 mg/kg clozapine vs. 5.0 mg/kg clozapine vs. vehicle.

Clozapine, the prototype for atypical antipsychotic drugs, is used in the drug discrimination paradigm as a model for screening atypical from typical antipsychotic drugs. Previous drug discrimination studies in rats have shown that a 1.25 mg/kg clozapine training dose provides full stimulus generalization (i.e.) >or=80% condition-appropriate responding) to most atypical antipsychotic drugs, although a 5.0 mg/kg clozapine training dose appears necessary to provide stimulus generalization to other atypical antipsychotic drugs. The present study sought to characterize the pharmacological mechanisms that mediate these clozapine training doses. In rats trained to discriminate 1.25 vs. 5.0 mg/kg clozapine vs. vehicle in a three-choice drug discrimination task, various receptor-selective compounds were tested for stimulus generalization. The antidepressant mianserin was also tested. Full stimulus generalization from the 1.25 mg/kg clozapine training dose occurred only to mianserin (98.8%). Partial substitution (i.e. >or=60% and <80% condition-appropriate responding) to the 5.0 mg/kg clozapine training dose occurred for the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine. The combined total percentage of responding on the 1.25 and 5.0 mg/kg clozapine levers, however, was well above the full substitution criteria at the 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg scopolamine doses. The M1 agonist N-desmethylclozapine, the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine, the D1 antagonist SCH 23390, the D4 antagonist LU 38-012, the 5-HT1A agonist (+)-8-OH-DPAT, the 5-HT1A antagonist WAY 100 635, the 5-HT2A/2B/2C antagonist ritanserin, the 5-HT6 antagonist RO4368554, the alpha1 antagonist prazosin, the alpha2 antagonist yohimbine, and the histamine H1 antagonist pyrilamine all failed to substitute for either the 1.25 or the 5.0 mg/kg clozapine training doses. These results are consistent with previous evidence that antidepressant drugs have a tendency to substitute for clozapine and that muscarinic receptor antagonism may mediate the discriminative stimulus properties of 5.0 mg/kg clozapine. The lack of stimulus generalization from either clozapine training dose to other receptor-selective compounds, however, fails to explain how this model screens atypical from typical antipsychotic drugs and suggests that the discriminative stimulus properties of clozapine consist of a compound cue.

Animals↗

Rapid formation of clozapine in guinea-pigs and man following clozapine-N-oxide administration.

Clozapine and its metabolite clozapine-N-oxide (0.5 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally to guinea-pigs. Significant amounts of clozapine were detected in plasma, liver, frontal cortex and caudate after clozapine-N-oxide administration. The amount of clozapine detected in plasma two hours post-administration of N-oxide was approximately 40% of the amount of clozapine after clozapine injection. Tissue concentrations of clozapine in liver, frontal cortex and caudate were greater than plasma concentrations. Clozapine concentrations were almost equivalent in the liver. Clozapine concentrations after N-oxide injection were approximately 40-50% lower compared to clozapine concentrations after clozapine administration in the frontal cortex and caudate. A single dose of clozapine-N-oxide was given to a schizophrenic patient. Clozapine plasma concentrations were detected after N-oxide administration. This study shows that clozapine is formed from its N-oxide metabolite and that a reversible metabolic pathway exists for clozapine and clozapine-N-oxide.

Animals↗

Determination of clozapine, and its metabolites, N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine N-oxide in dog plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography.

Clozapine and its two major metabolites, N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine N-oxide were quantified using a high-performance liquid chromatographic method with UV detection in dog plasma following a single dose of clozapine. The analysis was performed on a 5-micrometer Hypersil CN (CPS-1; 250x4.6 mm) column. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile-water-1 M ammonium acetate (50:49:1, v/v/v), which was adjusted to pH 5.0 with acetic acid. The detection wavelength was 254 nm. A liquid-liquid extraction technique was used to extract clozapine and its metabolites from dog plasma. The recovery rates for clozapine, N-desmethylclozapine, and the internal standard (I.S.) were close to 100% using this method. The recovery rate for clozapine N-oxide (62-66%) was lower as expected because it is more polar. The quantitation limits for clozapine, clozapine N-oxide, and N-desmethylclozapine were 0.11, 0.05 and 0.05 microM, respectively. Intra-day reproducibility for concentrations of 0.1, 1.0 and 5.0 microM were 10.0, 4.4 and 4.2%, respectively, for N-oxide; 11.2, 4.3 and 4.9%, respectively, for N-desmethylclozapine; and 10.8, 2.2 and 4.9%, respectively, for clozapine. Inter-day reproducibility was <15% for clozapine N-oxide, <8% for N-desmethylclozapine and <19% for clozapine. This simple method was applied to determine the plasma concentration profiles of clozapine, N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine N-oxide in dog following administration of a 10 mg/kg oral dose of clozapine.

Animals↗

Synthesis of clozapine analogues and their affinity for clozapine and spiroperidol binding sites in rat brain.

Analogues of clozapine, some prepared by a novel, shorter synthesis than those described previously, were evaluated as potential antipsychotic agents using clozapine binding sites in rat forebrain that are nonmuscarinic and nondopaminergic in nature and from which [3H]clozapine is displaced by known antipsychotic agents. The binding of clozapine to muscarinic sites is inhibited in the presence of atropine. Displacement of [3H]clozapine by an analogue of clozapine in the presence of atropine represents nonmuscarinic binding, while displacement in the absence of atropine represents muscarinic (cholinergic) plus nonmuscarinic binding. The relative affinity of the analogues for dopamine binding sites was determined by their ability to displace [3H]spiroperidol from binding sites in rat caudate nuclei. To the extent which binding affinity for nonmuscarinic clozapine sites in rat forebrain reflects the antipsychotic potential of a particular drug, dibenzo-5H-cycloheptene analogues of clozapine are as effective as clozapine itself. Strong binding to nonmuscarinic clozapine sites is not dependent on the presence of a chlorine atom on th tricyclic system. One or both of the nitrogen atoms in the dibenzo-5H-[1,4]diazepine ring of clozapine appear to be necessary for the strong inhibition of clozapine binding to spiroperidol sites in rat caudate nuclei. Anticholinergic activity is substantially higher for clozapine and its dibenz[1,4]oxazepine analogue than for its benzo-5H-cycloheptene analogue.

Animals↗

Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine treatment. Therapeutic threshold value for serum clozapine concentrations.

It has been suggested that the minimum effective serum clozapine concentration for an acceptable clinical response (threshold value) is about 400 micrograms/L. This article argues against the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as a tool to obtain clozapine concentrations of > or = 400 micrograms/L in the individual patient from the start of clozapine treatment. The following arguments are presented: (i) because of a great interindividual variability of the clozapine concentration to dose ratio (C/D) it can be calculated that extremely high daily doses (900 to 1800 mg/day) would be necessary in 15% of patients to obtain a clozapine concentration of 400 micrograms/L; (ii) doses of 200 to 300 mg/day are commonly used in Central Europe. although about 80% of the patients can be expected to have clozapine concentration < 400 micrograms/L; (iii) in a double-blind study, no difference in clinical response was found between patients treated with clozapine in the concentration range of 200 to 300 micrograms/L, and a group with higher clozapine concentrations; (iv) positron emission topography (PET) studies indicate that maximum receptor occupancy is obtained at clozapine concentrations of about 200 micrograms/L and no further receptor occupancy is obtained by increasing clozapine concentrations to > or = 400 micrograms/L; (v) the frequency of both severe clozapine-induced adverse effects (seizure and confusion) and more common adverse effects increases with increasing doses/clozapine concentrations. It is concluded that the antipsychotic effects and adverse effects of clozapine occur over a very broad range of serum concentrations. In most countries the majority of patients are treated with clozapine concentrations well below the 400 micrograms/L suggested as threshold concentration for optimum response. Therefore clinical judgement should always be primarily used for dose adjustments. TDM is useful to follow compliance and to adjust for extreme serum concentrations and revealing drug interactions.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

Clozapine-induced fevers and 1-year clozapine discontinuation rate.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine-induced fever is a known side effect that can occur during clozapine initiation. This study aims to characterize patients who experience clozapine-induced fever, the nature of the fevers, and rates of clozapine continuation at 1 year in patients who develop fever versus those who do not. METHOD: A retrospective chart review of 93 consecutive clozapine initiations (1991-1999) was conducted. Fever was defined as any 1 temperature at or above 38.0 degrees C (100.4 degrees F). Demographic information, presence or absence of clozapine-induced fevers, and continuation of clozapine treatment at 1 year were extracted from the charts. These variables were analyzed for significance, and subsample analysis was conducted for those with more severe fevers (at or above 38.5 degrees C [101.3 degrees F]). RESULTS: Of the 93 patients, 20.4% (N = 19) developed clozapine-induced fevers. At 1 year, there was no significant difference in clozapine discontinuation rate between those patients who experienced fever and those who did not. Patients who experienced higher fevers (> or = 38.5 degrees C [101.3 degrees F]) tended to be significantly older than those who did not (p < .027). The mean fever duration was 3.8 days (range, 1-9 days), with a mean temperature of 39.1 degrees C (102.4 degrees F) (range, 38.0-41.0 degrees C [100.4-105.8 degrees F]). At 1 year, the patients who experienced fever showed no increased risk of severe reactions such as agranulocytosis. All patients with fevers continued clozapine treatment with good 1-year continuation rate on treatment with this medication. CONCLUSION: Clozapine-induced fever is not an indication for discontinuing this effective medication. It is a benign, self-limited phenomenon not predictive of drug discontinuation at 1 year. Older age at time of treatment may be a risk factor for developing clozapine-induced fever.

Adolescent↗

Effect of coadministration of clozapine and fluvoxamine versus clozapine monotherapy on blood cell counts, plasma levels of cytokines and body weight.

RATIONALE: Clozapine treatment is associated with side-effects such as blood cell dyscrasias and weight gain. Increased plasma levels of the cytokines and soluble cytokine receptors leptin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), soluble TNF receptors p55 and p75, as well as toxic metabolites of clozapine, have been suggested as the basis for these side-effects, OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether the coadministration of the selective serotonine reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine, which interferes with clozapine's hepatic metabolism, affects the immunomodulation by clozapine and some of its side-effects. METHODS: The following parameters were measured: circulating levels of the cytokines and soluble receptors, plasma concentrations of clozapine and its metabolite N-desmethylclozapine, body weight and blood cell counts in 11 and 12 schizophrenic inpatients on combined and monotherapy, respectively, before and during the first 6 weeks of medication. RESULTS: On the basis of comparable plasma levels of clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine, the coadministration of fluvoxamine 1) attenuated and delayed the clozapine-induced increase in TNF-alpha plasma levels, 2) enhanced and accelerated the clozapine-induced increase in leptin plasma levels without significant effect on clozapine-induced weight gain, and 3) decreased granulocyte counts. CONCLUSIONS: As clozapine, its metabolite N-desmethylclozapine and fluvoxamine are unlikely to make these differences, other metabolites might be responsible. The coadministration of clozapine and fluvoxamine offers the opportunity to investigate further the putative associations between certain metabolites, immunomodulation and these side-effects.

Adolescent↗

The cytotoxicity of clozapine metabolites: implications for predicting clozapine-induced agranulocytosis.

BACKGROUND: Therapy of schizophrenia with clozapine is associated with the unpredictable development of severe neutropenia and agranulocytosis in 1% to 2% of patients. The mechanism of this effect is unknown but may involve reactive products of clozapine generated by either hepatic metabolism or oxidation by the peroxidase-peroxide system of activated neutrophils. METHODS: Involvement of reactive metabolites was tested with in vitro cytotoxicity assays with use of peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from 3 groups of subjects: normal control subjects, patients with schizophrenia who tolerated clozapine therapy (control patients), and patients with schizophrenia in whom agranulocytosis developed while taking clozapine (patients with agranulocytosis). Cell viability was determined after incubations with clozapine and rat liver microsomes or clozapine and horseradish peroxidase-peroxide (HRP-H2O2). RESULTS: In microsomal incubations, clozapine significantly increased the cell death in all groups: control subjects (8.8%+/-1.6%), control patients (7.4%+/-0.4%), and patients with agranulocytosis (9.1%+/-1.5%). However, differences between mean values were not statistically significant. In similar incubations with HRP-H2O2, clozapine significantly increased toxicity (P < .05) in cells from patients with agranulocytosis (22%+/-4.6%) compared with those from normal control subjects (7.7%+/-4.1%) or control patients (6.5%+/-4.4%). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that both generating systems metabolized clozapine to toxic products. Some products may play a role in clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. Of diagnostic relevance is the observation the HRP-H2O2 produces significantly greater toxicity in cells from patients with agranulocytosis than in cells from control patients. Although the exact mechanism(s) of drug activation in vivo remains unclear, the bioactivation of clozapine by HRP-H2O2 may be a useful in vitro tool for predicting which patients are at risk for agranulocytosis before initiation of therapy.

Agranulocytosis↗

Effects of clozapine on in vitro immune parameters: a longitudinal study in clozapine-treated schizophrenic patients.

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic agent with immunomodulatory properties. We hypothesized that in vitro immune parameters of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) are affected in the course of clozapine treatment and that clozapine per se, added in vitro to PBMC cultures of clozapine-treated patients, exerts differential effects in the timecourse of treatment in vivo. We measured proliferation and cytokine secretion of PBMC, serum autoantibodies, and immunoglobulin levels in 17 patients before and during the first 6 weeks of clozapine treatment. Independent of clozapine dosage and rectal temperature, clozapine treatment in vivo suppressed proliferation and shedding of sIL-2r by PBMC, and the addition of clozapine in vitro induced, relative to unstimulated conditions, PBMC proliferation and secretion of IL-6 and sIL-2r. Serum IgG levels were increased; whereas, autoantibody pattern was unaffected. Thus, clozapine treatment and the addition of clozapine in vitro exert differential effects on various in vitro immune parameters independent of clozapine dosage and rectal temperature in the course of treatment.

Adult↗

Influence of dose, cigarette smoking, age, sex, and metabolic activity on plasma clozapine concentrations: a predictive model and nomograms to aid clozapine dose adjustment and to assess compliance in individual patients.

The measurement of plasma clozapine concentrations is useful in assessing compliance, optimizing therapy, and minimizing toxicity. We measured plasma clozapine and norclozapine (N-desmethylclozapine) concentrations in samples from 3782 patients (2648 male, 1127 female). No clozapine was detected in 291 samples (227 patients, median prescribed dose 300 mg/d). In 4963 (50.2 %) samples (2222 patients); plasma clozapine concentration ranged from 10 to 350 ng/mL.Step-wise backward multiple regression analysis (37 % of the total samples) of log10 plasma clozapine concentration against log10 clozapine dose (mg/d), age (year), sex (male = 0, female = 1), cigarette smoking habit (nonsmokers = 0; smokers = 1), body weight (kg), and plasma clozapine/norclozapine ratio (clozapine metabolic ratio, MR) showed that these covariates explained 48% of the observed variation in plasma clozapine concentration (C = ng/mL x 10-3) (P < 0.001) according to the following equation: log 10 (C) = 0.811 log 10 (dose) + 0.332 (MR) + 69.42 X 10 (-3) (sex) + 2.263 x 10 (-3) (age) + 1.976 x 10(-3) (weight) - 0.171 (smoking habit) - 3.180. This model and its associated confidence intervals were used to develop nomograms of plasma clozapine concentration versus dose for male and female smokers and nonsmokers. Predicted plasma clozapine changes by +48% in nonsmokers, +17% in females, +/-8 % for every 0.1 change in MR (reference 1.32), +/-4% for every 5 years (reference 40 years), and +/-5 % for every 10 kg body weight (reference 80 kg). The nomograms can be used (i) to individualize dosage to achieve a given target plasma clozapine concentration, and (ii) for quantitative evaluation of adherence by estimating the likelihood of an observed concentration being achieved by a given dosage regimen. The model has been validated against published data.

Adult↗

The time has come for revising the rules of clozapine blood monitoring in Europe. A joint expert statement from the European Clozapine Task Force.

The European Clozapine Task Force is a group of psychiatrists and pharmacologists practicing in 18 countries under European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulation, who are deeply concerned about the underuse of clozapine in European countries. Although clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, a large proportion of them do not have access to this treatment. Concerns about clozapine-induced agranulocytosis and stringent blood monitoring rules are major barriers to clozapine prescribing and use. There is a growing body of evidence that the incidence of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis is very low after the first year of treatment. Maintaining lifelong monthly blood monitoring after this period contributes to unjustified discontinuation of clozapine. We leverage recent and replicated evidence on the long-term safety of clozapine to call for the revision and updating of the EMA's blood monitoring rules, thus aiming to overcome this major barrier to clozapine prescribing and use. We believe the time has come for relaxing the rules without increasing the risks for people using clozapine in Europe.

Clozapine↗

Decomposition of clozapine N-oxide in the qualitative and quantitative analysis of clozapine and its metabolites.

Pooled plasma from healthy volunteers was spiked with pure, synthetic clozapine or clozapine N-oxide and then made alkaline with either sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate. The alkalized samples were allowed to stand at room temperature for various time intervals before extraction with organic solvent and then analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. It was found that clozapine N-oxide was reduced to clozapine in plasma made alkaline with sodium hydroxide, but such reduction was negligible in the plasma made alkaline with sodium carbonate. The amount of clozapine produced from clozapine N-oxide depended upon both the strength of the alkali added to the plasma and the duration of exposure of the plasma proteins plus clozapine N-oxide to the alkali. The reduction appears to take place through reducing equivalents generated by the action of strong alkali on plasma proteins. The thermal lability of clozapine N-oxide during gas chromatography-mass spectrometric analysis was also investigated. It was found that clozapine N-oxide was quantitatively decomposed to clozapine during gas chromatography-mass spectrometric analysis.

Chemistry Techniques, Analytical↗

Comparison of the effects of clozapine and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on progressive ratio schedule performance: evidence against the involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in the behavioural effects of clozapine.

RATIONALE: Performance on progressive ratio schedules has been proposed as a means of assessing the effects of drugs on the efficacy of reinforcers. A mathematical model (Killeen PR (1994) Mathematical principles of reinforcement. Behav Brain Sci 17:105-172) affords a basis for quantifying the effects of drugs on progressive ratio schedule performance. The model postulates a bitonic function relating response rate and ratio size. One parameter of the function, a, expresses the motivational effect of the reinforcer, whereas another parameter, delta, expresses the minimum time needed to execute a response, and is regarded as an index of 'motor capacity'. Previously we found that the atypical antipsychotic clozapine increased a, indicating an increase in reinforcer efficacy; a similar effect was observed with the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A) receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT). It has been suggested that some of clozapine's behavioural effects are mediated by agonistic action at 5-HT(1A) receptors. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the effects of clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT on progressive ratio schedule performance. METHODS: Rats were trained under a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule (50-min sessions). In experiment 1, they received acute doses of clozapine (4 mg kg(-1)) and 8-OH-DPAT (100 microg kg(-1)), alone and in combination with the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist N-[2-(4-[2-methoxyphenyl]-1-piperazinyl)ethyl]-N-2-yridinylcyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY-100635; 30 microg kg(-1)). In experiment 2, the effects of clozapine (2, 4 and 8 mg kg(-1)) and 8-OH-DPAT (25, 50 and 100 microg kg(-1)) were compared between intact rats and rats whose 5-HTergic pathways had been ablated by 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT). RESULTS: In both experiments, clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT increased a and delta. In experiment 1, WAY-100635 abolished the effect of 8-OH-DPAT on a and delta, but did not alter clozapine's effects on these parameters. In experiment 2, the effects of clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT did not differ between sham-lesioned and 5,7-DHT-lesioned rats. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm previous findings on the effects of clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT on progressive ratio schedule performance. 8-OH-DPAT's effects are probably mediated by post-synaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors; clozapine's effects are mediated by a different mechanism, which does not appear to involve 5-HT(1A) receptors and which does not depend upon an intact 5-HTergic pathway.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗

Reversible metabolism of clozapine and clozapine N-oxide in schizophrenic patients.

1. To characterize the interconversion process between clozapine and its metabolite clozapine N-oxide (CNO), eight healthy male schizophrenics were administered a single dose of clozapine or CNO in a randomized crossover manner. 2. Using a general pharmacokinetic model for the interconversion process, the mean total clearances of clozapine and CNO were 28.45 L/hr and 45.30 L/hr, respectively. These values were similar to the values obtained by the usual model-independent method of pharmacokinetic analysis. 3. When administered clozapine, mean CNO plasma concentrations of 17.7 +/- 16.4 ng/ml were slightly lower than the other clozapine metabolite-desmethylclozapine (DCLOZ) plasma levels of 24.4 +/- 8.6 ng/ml at the 12 hour time point. When CNO was administered, plasma concentrations at the 12 hour time point of clozapine were twice the amount of CNO (28.1 +/- 8.9 ng/ml vs 14.4 +/- 8.8 ng/ml). 4. DCLOZ plasma concentrations were detected in all patients upon clozapine administration. Upon CNO administration, only one patient had detectable plasma DCLOZ levels. 5. The interconversion process of clozapine and CNO could partially account for the wide interpatient variability reported for clozapine plasma concentrations in schizophrenic patients.

Adult↗

A comparison of clozapine and haloperidol in hospitalized patients with refractory schizophrenia. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Clozapine in Refractory Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine, a relatively expensive antipsychotic drug, is widely used to treat patients with refractory schizophrenia. It has a low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects but may cause agranulocytosis. There have been no long-term assessments of its effect on symptoms, social functioning, and the use and cost of health care. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, one-year, double-blind comparative study of clozapine (in 205 patients) and haloperidol (in 218 patients) at 15 Veterans Affairs medical centers. All participants had refractory schizophrenia and had been hospitalized for the disease for 30 to 364 days in the previous year. All patients received case-management and social-rehabilitation services, as clinically indicated. RESULTS: In the clozapine group, 117 patients (57 percent) continued their assigned treatment for the entire year, as compared with 61 (28 percent) of the patients in the haloperidol group (P<0.001). As judged according to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale of Schizophrenia, patients in the clozapine group had 5.4 percent lower symptom levels than those in the haloperidol group at all follow-up evaluations (mean score, 79.1 vs. 83.6; P=0.02). The differences on a quality-of-life scale were not significant in the intention-to-treat analysis, but they were significant among patients who did not cross over to the other treatment (P=0.003). Over a one-year period, patients assigned to clozapine had fewer mean days of hospitalization for psychiatric reasons than patients assigned to haloperidol (143.8 vs. 168.1 days, P=0.03) and used more outpatient services (133.6 vs. 97.9 units of service, P=0.03). The total per capita costs to society were high -- $58,151 in the clozapine group and $60,885 in the haloperidol group (P=0.41). The per capita costs of antipsychotic drugs were $3,199 in the clozapine group and $367 in the haloperidol group (P<0.001). Patients assigned to clozapine had less tardive dyskinesia and fewer extrapyramidal side effects. Agranulocytosis developed in three patients in the clozapine group; all recovered fully. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with refractory schizophrenia and high levels of hospital use, clozapine was somewhat more effective than haloperidol and had fewer side effects and similar overall costs.

Adult↗

Metabolism of clozapine by human neutrophils: evidence for a specific oxidation of clozapine by the myeloperoxidase system with inhibition of enzymatic chlorination cycle.

The use of clozapine, an unique antipsychotic drug, raises the real problem of drug-induced polymorphonuclear neutrophil cytotoxicity. Clozapine prescription has been restricted due to a 1-2% incidence of drug-induced agranulocytosis. The exact mechanism of this adverse effect is not yet known. The myeloperoxidase-hydrogen peroxide system could play a key role in the initiation of agranulocytosis. Therefore, we have investigated the clozapine effects on hydrogen peroxide and hypochlorous acid, evaluated the peroxidase-mediated metabolism of clozapine by mass spectrometry analysis because myeloperoxidase uses hydrogen peroxide and chloride producing hypochlorous acid in its chlorination cycle, and thus could oxidise clozapine in its peroxidation cycle. First, evidence for inhibition of hypochlorous acid production and scavenging of hydrogen peroxide by clozapine were demonstrated in vitro, in different cell-free and cellular systems. Results are consistent with an inhibition of the myeloperoxidase chlorination cycle when clozapine is oxidised in the peroxidation cycle. Secondly, ion-spray mass spectrometry analysis allowed us to confirm clozapine oxidation by the myeloperoxidase system. Actually, clozapine N-oxide with a m/z at 343 was formed. It could be the final step of the metabolisation of clozapine via two successive univalent oxidations mediated by peroxidase. We suggest that generation of a free cation radical, CLZ(o+), was the initial step. CLZ(o+) is a very reactive species and may play an important role in the onset of agranulocytosis either by direct toxicity or via an immunological mechanism. However, this assumption does not exclude the possible role of other metabolic ways involving, in particular, N-desmethylclozapine.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

Chronic clozapine, but not haloperidol, alters the response of mesoprefrontal dopamine neurons to stress and clozapine challenges in rats.

Previously, we demonstrated that serotonin-lesioned rats had an enhanced mesoprefrontal dopaminergic response to restraint stress. This study attempted to extend our knowledge regarding this serotonin/dopamine interaction by seeing if suppression of serotonin metabolism by chronic administration of the atypical antipsychotic, clozapine, would have similar effects. Both typical and atypical neuroleptics require chronic administration in humans before antipsychotic activity is seen. Rats treated for 21 days with clozapine or haloperidol, a typical antipsychotic without significant binding affinity for serotonergic receptors, showed lowered basal dopamine metabolism in the medial prefrontal cortex, the nucleus accumbens, and the striatum, as expected. Basal serotonin metabolism in the prefrontal cortex was also lowered by clozapine treatment, but not haloperidol. One of two challenges were given to chronically treated rats: 30 min of restraint stress or an acute challenge of clozapine. When corrected for baseline differences, both challenges significantly elevated dopamine metabolism in the prefrontal cortex of the clozapine group more than the saline or haloperidol groups. No hyperresponsiveness was seen with serotonin metabolism in the prefrontal cortex or either dopamine or serotonin metabolism in the nucleus accumbens in clozapine-treated, challenged rats. Additionally, this augmentation of the dopaminergic stress response was not seen with a single, acute administration of clozapine. The significance of the clozapine-induced hyperresponsiveness of the mesoprefrontal dopamine system is discussed with regard to clinical efficacy of clozapine.

Animals↗