Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Clozapine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect of atenolol versus ivabradine on heart rate variability in patients of schizophrenia with clozapine-induced tachycardia: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A third of schizophrenia cases are resistant to antipsychotics, where clozapine is the only FDA-approved medication. Clozapine use is often limited by intolerable adverse effects. Persistent tachycardia occurs in approximately 25-54% patients receiving clozapine. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a non-invasive, clinically relevant marker of autonomic nervous system functioning. Atenolol and Ivabradine are usually prescribed for clozapine-induced tachycardia (CIT), although evidence guiding their optimal use remains limited. AIM: This study aimed to compare the effects of atenolol versus ivabradine on HRV in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) receiving clozapine. METHODS: This open-label randomised clinical trial, conducted at a tertiary-care center over 20 months, involved TRS patients on clozapine for more than three months and having persistent tachycardia. Twenty patients received atenolol 25mg once-daily, while twenty received ivabradine 5mg twice-daily for two months. The primary outcome was the change in the frequency domain of HRV, while the secondary outcomes were time-domains, central and peripheral blood pressure, pulse rate and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). RESULTS: While both drugs significantly reduced pulse-rates (atenolol: -20.56&#xb1;13.00, p<0.001; ivabradine: -21.855&#xb1;12.873, p<0.001). Within-group analysis showed that, the atenolol group had significant improvements in high-frequency [HF] power (p=0.048) and LF/HF ratio (p=0.044), along with a non-significant trend towards increased total power (p=0.053); no significant within-group changes were observed in the ivabradine group. CONCLUSION: No significant between-group differences in HRV parameters were established between atenolol and ivabradine. Ivabradine could be a viable option in patients where atenolol is either contraindicated or not tolerated. Future larger multicentric studies are needed for greater generalisability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06505668.

Humans

Cardiovascular risks in psychiatric disorders and psychiatric risks in cardiovascular disorders: implications for prevention and clinical management - a large-scale umbrella review encompassing 76 meta-analyses.

OBJECTIVE: Psychiatric and cardiovascular disorders often co-occur, complicating their assessment and management. No umbrella review(UR) has summarized the meta-analytic evidence on the co-occurrence of psychiatric and cardiovascular disorders and assessed its credibility. METHODS: Meta-analytic systematic reviews of observational studies documenting the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with the co-occurrence of cardiovascular and psychiatric disorders, indexed from inception through March.16.2026, and meeting established diagnostic criteria, were included. Meta-analytic association and prevalence estimates were recalculated and graded based on established or adapted criteria. The AMSTAR-2 assessed the quality of the meta-analyses, while several subgroup analyses and meta-regressions aimed to explain the heterogeneity. RESULTS: We included 76 meta-analyses yielding 131 meta-analytic estimates. Based on pre-existing meta-analytic evidence, 22/24 prevalence estimates (91.7%) met moderate/strong credibility criteria. Strong credibility emerged for: orthostatic hypotension in Lewy body(58%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;50-66%) and Alzheimer's dementias(28.0%&#xa0;=&#xa0;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;17.0-40.0%); pericardial effusion in anorexia nervosa(25.0%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;17.0-34.0%); in heart failure(HF): major depressive disorder(MDD)(41.9%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;36.7-47.1%), mild cognitive impairment(MCI)(41.4%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;38.3-45.6%), anxiety(32.0%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;26.5-37.6%), MDD&#xa0;+&#xa0;anxiety(24.7%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;17.9-34.3%), and dementia(19.8%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;12.9-27.8%); in atrial fibrillation(AF): MCI(26.0%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;21.0-30.0%), anxiety in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation(PVI)(25.0%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;12.0-46.0%), MDD in PVI patients (20.0%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;13.0-29.0%); in coronary artery disease: MDD&#xa0;+&#xa0;anxiety(19.8%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;16.0-24.6%): in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: clozapine-associated-cardiomyopathy(0.6%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.2-2.3%); clozapine-associated-cardiomyopathy absolute death rates (0.0003;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0001-0.0012); clozapine-associated-cardiomyopathy case fatality rate (0.078;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.018-0.285). Several additional disorders were multimorbid in>5% of people, yet with a lower credibility rating. No re-pooled risk factors/outcomes reached strong credibility criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides an atlas of cardiovascular and psychiatric multimorbidity across varying levels of credibility, reinforcing the need for an integrated, multidisciplinary approach to patient care and for more research on actionable risk/protective factors and outcomes.

Humans