Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Clindamycin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1985

Effects of clindamycin in combination with rifampicin on clindamycin-susceptible and clindamycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

The effects of the combination of clindamycin and rifampicin against 21 strains of clindamycin-susceptible and 19 strains of clindamycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were studied by the time-kill method. For the clindamycin-susceptible strains, clindamycin prevented the re-growth of Staph. aureus in the presence of rifampicin. For the clindamycin-resistant Staph. aureus strains, indifference was demonstrated against the majority of strains, with only a few strains showing synergism or antagonism.

Clindamycin↗
PubMed1978

High-pressure liquid chromatographic assays for clindamycin, clindamycin phosphate, and clindamycin palmitate.

High-pressure liquid chromatographic procedures are described for clindamycin, clindamycin palmitate, and clindamycin phosphate as bulk drugs and in formulations. All three procedures utilize a C18 reversed-phase chromatographic column with refractive index detection. The mobile phases are hydroalcoholic solutions containing dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate or disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate. Separations of related impurities or degradation products also are discussed. The relative standard deviations of the methods range from 0.8 to 1.8%.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed1986

Occurrence of clindamycin-resistant anaerobic bacteria isolated from cultures taken following clindamycin therapy.

MICs of clindamycin were determined by the agar dilution method against anaerobic organisms isolated from endometrial cultures in women with pelvic soft tissue infections. Cultures were obtained from 100 women both before and after clindamycin therapy, from 107 women before therapy with clindamycin or another antimicrobial agent or after treatment with an antimicrobial agent other than clindamycin, and from 9 women 1 to 9 weeks after they were discharged from the hospital following clindamycin therapy. Only 5 (0.7%) of 685 isolates tested from women who had not received clindamycin therapy were resistant to clindamycin. From the 100 cultures taken immediately after clindamycin therapy, 57 anaerobic bacteria were isolated from 28 cultures. Of the 40 anaerobic organisms for which MICs of clindamycin were determined, 25 (62.5%) were resistant to clindamycin (MIC greater than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml). The most common organisms isolated after therapy were the anaerobic gram-positive cocci (of which 32 isolates were discovered); of 28 coccal isolates tested, 64% were clindamycin resistant. Four of seven (57%) of the Bacteroides isolates tested, one unidentified gram-positive nonsporing rod, one unidentified gram-negative coccus, and one Mobiluncus sp. were also clindamycin resistant. Of 18 anaerobic isolates from the nine cultures taken 1 to 9 weeks after hospital discharge, 55% were resistant to clindamycin. The clinical significance of these findings is unknown since all patients recovered without incident and remained well. However, the data suggest that physicians need to be aware that patients with recent exposure to clindamycin may have clindamycin-resistant anaerobic organisms in a current infection. This may prevent the infection from responding to clindamycin treatment.

Bacteria, Anaerobic↗
PubMed2005

Induction of clindamycin resistance in erythromycin-resistant, clindamycin susceptible and methicillin-resistant clinical Staphylococcal isolates.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the in vitro ability of erythromycin to induce clindamycin in erythromycin resistant and clindamycin susceptible clinical isolates of Staphylococci. METHODS: We studied 291 clinical isolates of erythromycin-resistant (ER-R) clindamycin-susceptible Staphylococci (CL-S) at Almana General Hospitals, Al-Khobar, Dammam, Saudi Arabia during the period from June 2004 to May 2005. The isolates included 70 Staphylococcus aureus, 81 Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and 140 coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS). We examined these isolates for inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR) by erythromycin induction test using double disc susceptibility test (D-test). Strains producing ICR show flattening of the clindamycin disc zone adjacent to the erythromycin disc. RESULTS: Of the 291 ER Staphylococci studied, 82 (28%) demonstrated constitutive clindamycin resistance [2 (2.9%) S. aureus, 43 (53%) MRSA and 37 (26%) CNS]. Inducible clindamycin resistance was demonstrated in 113 (38.8%) of Staphylococcal isolates, including 84 (28.9%) from adult patients and 29 (10%) from pediatric patients. The incidence of ICR was 49 (70%) for S. aureus, 35 (43%) for MRSA and 29 (20.7)% for CNS. Overall, 96 (33%) of the isolates remained susceptible to clindamycin and were negative for clindamycin induction [19 (27%) S. aureus, 3 (3.7%) MRSA and 74 (52.8%) CNS]. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a significant number of ER-R CL-S staphylococcal isolates studied were positive for ICR. These isolates should be reported as clindamycin resistant. Given the high rate of inducible resistance to clindamycin in the staphylococcal isolates, we recommend that microbiology laboratories perform erythromycin induction test on all ER-R CL-S staphylococcal isolates prior to reporting clindamycin susceptibility.

Clindamycin↗
PubMed2002

A randomized, double-blind comparison of a clindamycin phosphate/benzoyl peroxide gel formulation and a matching clindamycin gel with respect to microbiologic activity and clinical efficacy in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: One approach to suppressing the overgrowth of antibiotic-resistant bacteria is to develop combination products composed of active constituents with complementary but distinct mechanisms of antibacterial action. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the antimicrobial and clinical efficacy and tolerability of clindamycin phosphate 1%/benzoyl peroxide 5% gel formulation with matching clindamycin 1% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris. METHODS: This 16-week, single-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study compared the combination gel with clindamycin monotherapy applied BID in patients 13 to 30 years of age with mild to moderate acne and facial Propionibacterium acnes counts > or = 10(4) colony-forming units per square centimeter of skin. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive the combination gel (n = 40) or clindamycin monotherapy (n = 39). Seventy patients (50 males, 20 females; mean age, 18.2 years) were included in the intent-to-treat group. The combination gel treatment produced significantly greater reductions (P < or = 0.046) from baseline in total lesion counts and in numbers of inflammatory lesions and comedones compared with clindamycin monotherapy. Greater reductions in the severity of acne also were observed in the physician's and patient's Clinical Global Improvement scale scores and in other secondary efficacy measurements. Reductions in clindamycin-resistant P acnes counts were observed relative to baseline in the combination gel group; in contrast, P acnes counts increased by >1,600% in the clindamycin monotherapy group at week 16 (P = 0.018 vs combination gel). Reductions in inflammatory (r2 = 0.31; P = 0.016) and total (r2 = 0.28; P = 0.027) lesions were correlated with decreases in clindamycin-resistant bacteria. Also, significant correlations were observed between the percent change from baseline in total lesion counts (r2 = 0.44; P < 0.001) and comedo counts (r2 = 0.50; P < 0.001) and the log10 change from baseline in total P acnes counts. CONCLUSIONS: The total P acnes count (P = 0.002) and the clindamycin-resistant P acnes count (P = 0.018) were significantly reduced after 16 weeks of treatment with combination gel compared with clindamycin monotherapy. These reductions in total P acnes and clindamycin-resistant P acnes counts correlated with reductions in total acne lesions.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1999

Systemic absorption of clindamycin after intravaginal administration of clindamycin phosphate ovule or cream.

The absolute bioavailability of clindamycin phosphate vaginal ovule with comparison to a reference treatment of clindamycin phosphate sterile solution, as well as the relative bioavailability of the ovule compared to clindamycin phosphate vaginal cream, was evaluated in 12 healthy adult female volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either the ovule or cream formulation intravaginally for 3 consecutive days during the two-way crossover portion of the study. During a third treatment period, all subjects received 100 mg of clindamycin as a 4-minute intravenous infusion of clindamycin phosphate sterile solution (10 mg/mL). Clindamycin concentrations in serum were assayed by a high-performance liquid chromatography method with detection by mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic analyses of the serum data indicated low systemic absorption of clindamycin from the vaginal cream (about 4%), consistent with results of previous bioavailability studies. Following intravaginal administration of the clindamycin phosphate ovule, systemic absorption averaged 30%, which was approximately sevenfold greater than after dosing with the vaginal cream. The higher drug absorption for the ovule may be related to differences in formulation effects on the vaginal membrane. Nevertheless, systemic exposure to clindamycin from the ovule is still considerably lower than from a therapeutic oral dose.

Absorption↗
PubMed2005

Artesunate-clindamycin versus quinine-clindamycin in the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Artemisinin-based drug combinations are the mainstay in the fight against drug-resistant malaria in Africa. Currently available antimalarial drug combinations that include artemisinins are pharmacokinetically unmatched and are therefore potentially increasing the risk of selection of resistant mutants in areas in which the rate of transmission of malaria is high. We tested the potential value of artemisinin-based combination therapy with a short elimination half-life for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oral artesunate-clindamycin therapy given twice daily for 3 days (artesunate, 2 mg/kg, and clindamycin, 7 mg/kg, per dose), compared with a standard quinine-clindamycin regimen given twice daily for 3 days (quinine, 15 mg/kg, and clindamycin, 7 mg/kg, per dose), for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in 100 Gabonese children aged 3-12 years. The primary end point of the study was the polymerase chain reaction-corrected cure rate for the per-protocol population. RESULTS: The activity of artesunate-clindamycin was comparable to that of quinine-clindamycin in the per-protocol analysis of cure rates at day 28 of follow-up (87% versus 94%). No serious adverse events were reported, and tolerability was good and was similar in both groups. Times to clearance of fever and clearance of parasites were significantly shorter in the artesunate-clindamycin group. CONCLUSIONS: Artesunate-clindamycin and other matching artemisinin-based combinations with a short plasma half-life merit further attention for use in regions in which the rate of transmission of malaria is high.

Antimalarials↗
PubMed1995

Absorption of clindamycin after intravaginal application of clindamycin phosphate 2% cream.

In recent clinical studies, clindamycin phosphate cream administered intravaginally has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV). In support of the safety profile for this dosage form, a study assessing the systemic absorption of clindamycin was undertaken in five BV patients and six healthy volunteers who were dosed with 5 mL (100 mg) clindamycin phosphate 2% cream intravaginally once daily in the evening for 7 days. Two weeks later, a single 100 mg dose of clindamycin phosphate sterile solution was administered as a 4 min iv infusion. Serial blood samples were collected on days 1, 4, and 7 after dosing with the cream and over a 16 h period after the iv treatment. Clindamycin concentrations in serum samples were assayed by capillary gas chromatography. After treatment with the cream, steady-state serum clindamycin concentrations were reached by 24 h in all but one subject in each group. Mean absolute bioavailability was 2.7%-4.3% in the BV group and 2.7%-4.7% in the healthy group. These results indicate that systemic exposure to clindamycin from intravaginal administration of clindamycin phosphate cream is minimal.

Absorption↗
PubMed1998

Penetration of clindamycin and its metabolite N-demethylclindamycin into cerebrospinal fluid following intravenous infusion of clindamycin phosphate in patients with AIDS.

Clindamycin, which is usually used in combination with pyrimethamine, has been proven effective in the treatment of cerebral toxoplasmosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. However, it is not known if clindamycin achieves inhibitory concentrations at the site of infection. Also, it has been hypothesized that the activity of clindamycin against Toxoplasma gondii may be due, at least in part, to a metabolite. We evaluated the penetration of clindamycin and its major metabolite, N-demethylclindamycin (NDC), into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of AIDS patients undergoing lumbar puncture for diagnostic purposes. A single, 1,200-mg dose of clindamycin was administered as a 45-min intravenous infusion beginning at 1.5 or 2.5 h before CSF sampling. The concentrations of clindamycin in CSF ranged from 0.091 to 0.429 mg/liter at 1.5 h and from 0.120 to 0.283 mg/liter at 2.5 h following the beginning of the infusion. The concentrations of clindamycin in CSF were well above the 50% inhibitory concentration of 0.001 mg/liter and the parasiticidal concentration of 0.006 mg/liter. NDC was undetectable both in plasma and in CSF. Our study provides a pharmacokinetic rationale for the clinical efficacy of clindamycin in the treatment of cerebral toxoplasmosis.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1978

Intraocular penetration of topical clindamycin in rabbits. II. Clindamycin phosphate.

We have obtained comparative data for the intraocular absorption of topically administered clindamycin hydrochloride hydrate and clindamycin phosphate, made feasible with a new gas chromatographic method of analysis. Results indicated that clindamycin phosphate underwent hydrolysis in the eye, liberating the biologically active clindamycin. However, topical clindamycin hydrochloride produced higher levels (two to six times more) of the antibiotic than those achievable with the phosphates ester in the uvea, aqueous humor, and cornea, presumably due to clindamycin hydrochloride's higher lipid solubility. Based on this data, clindamycin hydrochloride appears to be the preferred form of the antibiotic for topical ocular applications.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2005

Clindamycin bioavailability and pharmacokinetics following oral administration of clindamycin hydrochloride capsules in dogs.

Oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetic behaviour of clindamycin in dogs was investigated following intravenous (IV) and oral (capsules) administration of clindamycin hydrochloride, at the dose of 11 mg/kg BW. The absorption after oral administration was fast, with a mean absorption time (MAT) of 0.87+/-0.40 h, and bioavailability was 72.55+/-9.86%. Total clearance (CL) of clindamycin was low, after both IV and oral administration (0.503+/-0.095 vs. 0.458+/-0.087 L/h/kg). Volume of distribution at steady-state (IV) was 2.48+/-0.48 L/kg, indicating a wide distribution of clindamycin in body fluids and tissues. Elimination half-lives were similar for both routes of administration (4.37+/-1.20 h for IV, vs. 4.37+/-0.73 h for oral). Serum clindamycin concentrations following administration of capsules remained above the MICs of very susceptible microorganisms (0.04-0.5 microg/mL) for 12 or 10 h, respectively. Time above the mean inhibitory concentration (MIC) is considered as the index predicting the efficacy of clindamycin (T(>MIC) must be at least 40-50% of the dosing interval), so a once-daily oral administration of 11 mg/kg BW of clindamycin can be considered therapeutically effective. For less susceptible bacteria (with MICs of 0.5-2 microg/mL) the same dose should be given but twice daily.

Absorption↗
PubMed1985

Efficacy and safety of aztreonam-clindamycin versus tobramycin-clindamycin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections caused by aerobic gram-negative bacilli.

A total of 80 patients were randomized to receive either aztreonam or tobramycin for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections caused by gram-negative bacilli; all these patients received clindamycin concomitantly. A total of 53 patients were randomized to receive aztreonam-clindamycin; of these, 46 were clinically evaluable and 39 were bacteriologically evaluable. Of the 46 clinically evaluable patients, 41 were considered cured, 3 failed to be cured, and 2 died during the study period of unrelated causes. Of the 39 bacteriologically evaluable patients, 36 were considered cured, and 3 failed to be cured. There were 26 clinically evaluable patients in the group randomized to receive tobramycin-clindamycin. Of them, 22 patients were considered cured, 3 failed to be cured, and 1 died of unrelated causes during the study period. There were 18 bacteriologically evaluable patients in the tobramycin-clindamycin group; 17 were cured, and 1 failed to be cured. The most common pathogens isolated from the patients were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All of the isolated organisms were susceptible to both tested antibiotics, except for a strain of Pseudomonas cepacia resistant to both tested antimicrobial agents and a strain of Enterobacter aerogenes and one of P. aeruginosa that were resistant to aztreonam. Very few adverse reactions related to the antibiotics were seen. These effects, when present, were transient and comparable in both studied groups, except for renal-function tests, which were altered in 7.7% of the patients randomized to receive tobramycin-clindamycin and in none of the patients randomized to receive aztreonam-clindamycin. Aztreonam-clindamycin is safe and effective for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections caused by aerobic gram-negative bacilli when the organisms are susceptible.

Aged↗
PubMed1985

Prospective, randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of netilmicin-clindamycin and tobramycin-clindamycin in the treatment of serious systemic infections.

Fifty-three patients with documented or suspected mixed flora infections were randomly assigned to receive either netilmicin or tobramycin in combination with clindamycin. Data from 36 patients with 43 documented infections yielding 102 clinical isolates were evaluated for efficacy. In the 18 patients receiving netilmicin-clindamycin, 90% of the infections responded favorably and 96% of the pathogens were eliminated. In the 18 patients receiving tobramycin-clindamycin, 81% of the infections resolved and 88.5% of the pathogens were eliminated. Forty-nine patients were included in the safety analysis. The incidence of nephrotoxicity was similar in both groups (netilmicin, 20%; tobramycin, 21%). Auditory toxicity occurred less frequently in the netilmicin-clindamycin group (4.5%) than in the tobramycin-clindamycin group (21.7%). These results demonstrate that both the netilmicin-clindamycin and the tobramycin-clindamycin combinations are comparable in efficacy and in potential for causing nephrotoxicity. In this study, however, netilmicin was considerably less ototoxic than tobramycin.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Primary suture of anorectal abscess. A randomized study comparing treatment with clindamycin vs. clindamycin and Gentacoll.

UNLABELLED: Gentacoll (Schering-Plough A/S, DK-3520 Farum, Denmark) implant is a biologically absorbable collagen with gentamicin, which enables local use of gentamicin in an abscess cavity. PURPOSE: To increase healing rate in treatment of perianal abscess with primary suture, the effect of intraoperative parenteral clindamycin and Gentacoll was investigated against monotherapy with intraoperative clindamycin in a randomized study. METHODS: One hundred seven patients, 55 in the Gentacoll group and 52 in the control group, were enrolled in the study and followed for three months. RESULTS: Twelve patients (22 percent) in the Gentacoll group developed a new abscess and/or fistula. In the control group nine patients (17 percent) developed a recurrent abscess or a fistula. In both groups 43 patients had an uneventful course. The differences between the two groups were not significant. Of all 107 patients, 19.5 percent had recurrent disease in the follow-up period. Duration of hospitalization and reconvalescence were identical in both groups. One case of superficial thrombophlebitis was seen after clindamycin. No other adverse effects to either Gentacoll or clindamycin were seen. CONCLUSION: The study shows that Gentacoll is a safe preparation but is without value as a supplement to clindamycin in the treatment of acute perianal abscess with primary suture. The study has documented the value of this treatment under cover with a intraoperative dose of clindamycin.

Abscess↗
PubMed2005

A randomized prospective controlled trial of antibiotic prophylaxis in intraoral bone grafting procedures: single-dose clindamycin versus 24-hour clindamycin prophylaxis.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of a single oral dose of clindamycin with a 24-h protocol of clindamycin administration in local buccal onlay grafting procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study in 124 patients was performed. Eligible patients were randomized to receive antibiotic prophylaxis either as a single dose (group I) or over a 24-h period (group II). In both groups prophylaxis started with an oral dose of 600 mg clindamycin 1 h before surgery, followed by either placebo or 300 mg clindamycin every 6 h. The primary endpoint of this study was wound infection at the receptor site within 8 weeks after surgery. Secondary outcome measurements included postoperative infections at the donor site and adverse events as a result of antibiotic administration. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 35.9+/-10.1 years (range 18-59 years). Infections at the receptor site were seen in two patients (3.2%, 95% CI 0-7.6%) of the single-dose group and in three patients (4.8%, 95% CI 0-10.1%) of the 24-h group. Infection at the donor site occurred in four patients (6.4%, 95% CI 0-12.5%) of the single-dose group and in two patients (3.2%, 95% CI 0-7.6%) of the 24-h group. Postoperative infections were predominantly caused by alpha-hemolytic streptococci sensitive to penicillin. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference was found between the prophylactic single dose of clindamycin and the 24-h regimen of clindamycin with regard to postoperative infection in patients undergoing local bone augmentation procedures.

Adolescent↗