Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Chromosome Fragile Sites”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1987

Protective effect of S-adenosylmethionine against the induction of chromosome fragile sites.

Chromosome fragile sites were induced in the peripheral lymphocytes of 7 donors by treatment of the cells in culture with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine and caffeine. The appearance of these fragile sites was inhibited to a large extent and in a dose-dependent manner by S-adenosylmethionine. It is possible that this methyl donor exerted its protective action through restoration of the correct level of methylation of the DNA.

Caffeine↗
PubMed1998

Instability at chromosomal fragile sites.

Chromosomal fragile sites are loci that are especially prone to forming gaps or breaks on metaphase chromosomes when cells are cultured under conditions that inhibit DNA replication or repair. The relationship of "rare" folate sensitive fragile sites with (CCG)n expansion and, in some cases, genetic disease is well established. Although they comprise the vast majority of fragile sites, much less is known at the molecular level about the "common" fragile sites. These fragile sites may be seen on all chromosomes as a constant feature. In addition to forming fragile sites on metaphase chromosomes, they have been shown to display a number of characteristics of unstable and highly recombinogenic DNA in vitro, including chromosome rearrangements, sister chromatid exchanges and, more recently, intrachromosomal gene amplification. Only one such fragile site, FRA3B at 3p14.2, has been extensively investigated at the molecular level. It extends over a broad region of possibly 500 kb, and no trinucleotide or other simple repeat motifs have been identified in the region. FRA3B has recently been shown to lie within the FHIT gene locus. This region and the FHIT gene are unstable in a number of tumors and tumor cell lines. It thus appears that common fragile sites are also associated with unstable regions of DNA in vivo, at least in some tumor cells, and may cause this instability. Current challenges include determining the mechanism of fragile site expression and instability, and both the environmental and genetic factors that influence this process. Candidate factors include those genes involved in DNA repair and cell cycle and common carcinogens such as those in cigarette smoke.

Acid Anhydride Hydrolases↗
PubMed2005

Components of DNA damage checkpoint pathway regulate UV exposure-dependent alterations of gene expression of FHIT and WWOX at chromosome fragile sites.

Common chromosome fragile sites are highly recombinogenic and susceptible to deletions during the development of environmental carcinogen-induced epithelial tumors. Previous studies showed that not only genetic but also epigenetic alterations in cancerous cells are involved in inactivation of the genes FHIT and WWOX at chromosome fragile sites, reported to be potential tumor suppressor genes. Here we investigated the effect of UV light on the gene expression. After exposure to UV, the mRNA and protein of the two genes in murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) were unstable, apparently at the G1-S phase of the cell cycle, which was consistent with nuclear run-on assay. A study of MEFs synchronized via a double thymidine block indicated that, after the exposure, the expression of Fhit and Wwox was reduced in E2f-1-deficient cells and markedly in wild-type cells, whereas the reduction was partially inhibited in Trp53-deficient cells; cells at the S phase seemed to be sensitive to exogenous FHIT, suggesting a role of the checkpoint at the G1-S phase in the stability of gene expression and a possible involvement of FHIT function at the S phase. The transfection experiment showed that the UV-induced decrease in expression was partially inhibited by transfection of kinase-dead Atr (ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3 related), which is a sensor of UV-induced damage. Taken together, the present study showed that UV-induced alterations of the fragile site gene expression are involved at least partially in the checkpoint function, suggesting the role in the process of carcinogenesis after exposure to UV.

Acid Anhydride Hydrolases↗
PubMed1992

Population cytogenetics of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites.

Chromosome fragile sites are inducible by aphidicolin in cultured human lymphocytes. To assess the frequency and distribution of these common fragile sites in the general population, a cytogenetic survey was performed on 126 subjects, 59 males and 67 females, whose age ranged from 1 day to 72 years. Common fragile sites, induced by aphidicolin, were widespread and showed a remarkably different sensitivity among individuals; age influenced the overall frequency of fragile sites. Moreover, both age and sex seemed to modulate the expression of specific fragile sites. In our population, the most common fragile sites were: 3p14, 16q23, Xp22, 6q26, 1p31, 4q31, 1p22, 7q22, 2q33, 3q27, 2q31, 7q32, 14q24, 10q22, 5q31, 2q37, 6p21.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

Chromosome breakage and recombination at fragile sites.

Chromosomal fragile sites are points on chromosomes that usually appear as nonstaining chromosome or chromatid gaps. It has frequently been suggested that fragile sites may be involved in chromosome breakage and recombination events. We and others have previously shown that fragile sites predispose to intrachromosomal recombination as measured by sister-chromatid exchanges. These findings suggested that fragile site expression often, if not always, is accompanied by DNA strand breakage. In the present report, fragile sites are shown to predispose to deletions and interchromosomal recombination. By use of somatic cell hybrids containing either human chromosome 3 or the fragile X chromosome, deletions and translocations were induced by FUdR or aphidicolin with breakpoints at the fragile sites Xq27 or 3p14.2 (FRA3B) or at points so close to the fragile sites as to be cytogenetically indistinguishable. Southern blot analysis of DNA from a panel of chromosome 3 deletion and translocation hybrids was then utilized to detect loss or retention of markers flanking FRA3B and to corroborate the cytogenetic evidence that the breakpoints were at this fragile site. One cell line with a reciprocal translocation between human chromosome 3 (with breakpoint at 3p14.2) and a hamster chromosome showed cytogenetically that the fragile site was expressed on both derivative chromosomes, supporting the hypothesis that the fragile site represents a repeated sequence. The approach described provides a means of generating specific rearrangements in somatic cell hybrids with a breakpoint at a fragile site.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aphidicolin↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The determination of chromosome fragile sites in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with colorectal cancer taking into account the cancer pathology predisposition in the familial anamnesis].

Results of comparative study of spontaneous and 5-bromdeoxyuridine-induced fragility of peripheral blood lymphocytes chromosomes in 9 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma were presented. It was shown the increase of average spontaneous level of chromosomal fragility in patients with tumor aggregation in family as well as without it to 4.5 +/- 1.0 and 5.3 +/- 1.1 per 100 tested cells, accordingly. The increase of average level of damaged chromosomes in spectrum of rare sites to 12.5 +/- 2.6 in the patients with tumor aggregation in pedigree comparing to the patients without oncopathology in family 8.0 +/- 1.7 was observed. The most number of rare fragile sites was observed in 1q21 site of the chromosome 1. Possible connection between fragile sites of chromosomes in normal cells and malignant processes in the patients with colorectal cancer is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

How common are common fragile sites: variation of aphidicolin-induced chromosomal fragile sites in a population of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus).

Aphidicolin (APC)-induced chromosomal gaps and breaks were analyzed for ten deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) from a natural population. The FSM statistical methodology was used to identify fragile sites as chromosomal loci exhibiting significantly non-random numbers of gaps/breaks in each individual and enabled an assessment of variation in fragile sites among the individuals. The individual deer mice exhibited as few as 7 to as many as 19 of the populational total of 34 sites. Two sites were fragile in all individuals and 13 sites were fragile in single individuals only. Defined by populational frequencies of greater than 50%, high-frequency fragile sites constituted 26% of the populational total. Approximately 35% of the total fragile sites were fragile in 20-40% of the population (low-frequency fragile sites) and about 38% were fragile in single individuals only. Analysis of the data pooled over all individuals identified significantly non-random breakage at 80 sites, 47 of which were not identified as fragile in any single individual. It appears, therefore, that fragile site identifications from pooled data have fostered an inflated estimate of the numbers and frequencies of common fragile sites. Comparison of the fragile site and spontaneous breakage (control) data suggest that APC-induced fragile sites represent regions of chromosomes that experience elevated levels of somatic mutation. Additionally, the occurrence of APC-induced fragile sites at or near the interstitial breakpoints of two pericentric-inversion polymorphisms in this population supports the hypothesis that fragile sites experience an increased rate of meiotic chromosomal mutation and are predisposed to undergo phylogenetic rearrangement.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Evidence of chromosomal fragile sites in schizophrenic patients.

Chromosomal fragility and other chromosomal abnormalities were frequently observed in subjects with neuropsychiatric disorders, such as fragile X syndrome, autism or schizophrenia, but only for the first one the fragility is accepted to be associated to a specific pathology, so that it is used as a diagnostic marker. In this study the authors analyzed 50 schizophrenic males, searching for the rare fragile sites or other aberrations with the method suitable for fra(X) detection. Chromosomes from schizophrenic patients resulted more fragile than those from normal controls, especially chromosome 9. The authors discuss the implications of a possible association of these data with the aetiopathogenesis of schizophrenic syndrome.

Chromosome Fragile Sites↗
PubMed1997

Minimum sample sizes for identifying chromosomal fragile sites from individuals: Monte Carlo estimation.

A Monte Carlo simulation procedure was used to estimate the exact level of the standardized X2 test statistic (Xs2) for randomness in the FSM methodology for the identification of fragile sites from chromosomal breakage data for single individuals. A random-number generator was used to simulate 10,000 chromosomal breakage data sets, each corresponding to the null hypothesis of no fragile sites for numbers of chromosomal breaks (n) from 1 to 2000 and at three levels of chromosomal band resolution (k). The reliability of the test was assessed by comparisons of the empirical and nominal alpha levels for each of the corresponding values of n and k. These analyses indicate that the sparse and discrete nature of chromosomal breakage data results in large and unpredictable discrepancies between the empirical and nominal alpha levels when fragile site identifications are based on small numbers of breaks (n < 0.5 k). With n > or = 0.5 k, the distribution of Xs2 appears to be stable and non-significant differences in the empirical and nominal alpha levels are generally obtained. These results are inherent to the nature of the data and are, therefore, relevant to any statistical model for the identification of fragile sites from chromosomal breakage data. For FSM identification of fragile sites at alpha = 0.05, we suggest that n > or = 0.5 k is the minimum reliable number of mapped chromosomal breaks per individual.

Chromosome Fragile Sites↗
PubMed1989

[DNA repair capacity, chromosome aberration rate and chromosome fragile sites among members of 7 cancer families].

A nucleoid sedimentation technique was developed and used for analysis of DNA repair capacity in 40 members from 7 cancer families. Chromosome aberration rate (CAR) and chromosome fragile sites (CFS) were assayed simultaneously for comparison. It was shown that 32 members (80%) had a decreased DNA repair capacity and 34 (85%) had increased CAR as well as an apparent increase of CFS. 28 members (70%) showed both decreases of DNA repair capacity and increases of CAR. The importance of these criteria in heritable susceptibility to cancer is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A confirmation analysis method for identification of chromosomal fragile sites.

Fragile sites are chromosome bands that do not manifest a presumed breakage pattern. Identification of fragile sites is a way to investigate the mechanism of carcinogenesis because the fragility at a specific chromosome position may be the causation of an associated cancer. A problem in the identification of fragile sites is the high false positive rate arising from simultaneously carrying out a large number of significance tests. To control it, we propose to find a reference study to confirm the identification result of an objective study. We utilize the Bayesian concept for linking two studies. Basically, our method demonstrates a conservative way to take account of the prior information of a binomial parameter. The derived estimate of breakage probability can be interpreted as a resampling weighted sample-pooling method. It is applied to confirm the identification of fragile sites for a data set of neuroblastoma patients.

Chromosome Banding↗
PubMed1998

FRA10B structure reveals common elements in repeat expansion and chromosomal fragile site genesis.

A common mechanism for chromosomal fragile site genesis is not yet apparent. Folate-sensitive fragile sites are expanded p(CCG)n repeats that arise from longer normal alleles. Distamycin A or bromodeoxyuridine-inducible fragile site FRA16B is an expanded AT-rich approximately 33 bp repeat; however, the relationship between normal and fragile site alleles is not known. Here, we report that bromodeoxyuridine-inducible, distamycin A-insensitive fragile site FRA10B is composed of expanded approximately 42 bp repeats. Differences in repeat motif length or composition between different FRA10B families indicate multiple independent expansion events. Some FRA10B alleles comprise a mixture of different expanded repeat motifs. FRA10B fragile site and long normal alleles share flanking polymorphisms. Somatic and intergenerational FRA10B repeat instability analogous to that found in expanded trinucleotide repeats supports dynamic mutation as a common mechanism for repeat expansion.

Alleles↗
PubMed2005

FRA16D common chromosomal fragile site oxido-reductase (FOR/WWOX) protects against the effects of ionizing radiation in Drosophila.

Fragile sites are chromosomal structures that have been proposed to have a determining role in cancer-associated DNA instability. The human WWOX gene spans the FRA16D chromosomal fragile site, the common minimal region of homozygous deletion found in adenocarcinomas and three out of five translocation breakpoints in multiple myeloma. Transcripts from the alternatively spliced WWOX gene encode proteins with common N-terminal WW domains and variable homology to the oxidoreductase family of proteins. In this study, the Drosophila orthologue of the WWOX gene was identified and subjected to mutagenesis via homologous recombination. The resultant DmWWOX1 mutants were viable but exhibited an increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation. This radiation sensitivity was rescued by reintroduction and expression of either the wild-type Drosophila or human WWOX genes. Thus, the protective function of DmWWOX in response to irradiation in Drosophila is conserved with human WWOX (hWWOX). This is consistent with a protective role for hWWOX where aberrant expression, as a result of breakage at the associated fragile site, could contribute directly to cancer progression.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Fragile sites, chromosome evolution, and human neoplasia.

In a study of the possible relationship between human fragile sites, chromosomal rearrangements related to neoplasia, and chromosome regions involved in evolutionary changes, we have found that 17 fragile sites related to cancer, 15 fragile sites not related to cancer, and 17 non-fragile regions also related to human malignancy correspond or are close to bands involved in rearrangements that have taken place during chromosomal evolution in primates.

Animals↗