Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Chromosome Banding”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1981

Counterstain-enhanced chromosome banding.

Chromosome staining, in which at least one member of a pair or triplet of DNA binding dyes is fluorescent whereas the others act as counterstain, is reviewed. Appropriately chosen combinations of fluorescent dyes and counterstains can be employed to enhance general chromosome banding patterns, or to induce specific regional banding patterns. Some pairs of dyes which exhibit complementary DNA binding specificity, A-T/G-C or G-C/A-T, provide enhanced definition of positive or reverse banding patterns. Dye combinations of the type A-T/A-T, that include two DNA stains with similar specificity but non-identical binding modes, produce a specific pattern of brightly fluorescent heterochromatic regions (DA-DAPI bands). In man, the method highlights the C bands of chromosomes 1, 9, 15, 16, and the Y. Certain dye triplets of the type G-C/A-T/A-T, which include two spectroscopically separated fluorescent stains with reciprocal DNA base pair binding specificities and a non-fluorescent A-T binding counterstain, can be used to highlight selectively, in the appropriate wavelength ranges, either R bands or DA-DAPI bands. Applications of these techniques in human cytogenetics are described. The potential of the new methodology for detecting and analysing specific chromosome bands is demonstrated. The mechanisms responsible for contrast enhancement and pattern induction are reviewed and their implications for chromosome structure are discussed as they relate to the banding phenomenon and to the DNA composition of chromosomes.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Chromosome-band-specific painting: chromosome in situ suppression hybridization using PCR products from a microdissected chromosome band as a probe pool.

We describe a chromosome-band-specific painting method that involves (1) microdissection of the chromosome, chromosomal region or band, (2) amplification of a variety of chromosome/region/band-specific DNA fragments with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and (3) chromosome in situ suppression hybridization (CISS) with the direct use of the PCR products as a probe pool. With this method, it was possible 1) to paint an entire X or Y chromosome, a distal one-fourth of 2q, and only a band at 8q24.1, 2) to identify the origin of a minute marker chromosome in a mentally retarded patient, 3) to detect an X;Y translocation in another patient, and 4) to identify one human chromosome 2 in a human-mouse hybrid cell line. This method allows us to identify not only structural chromosome abnormalities at the band level, but also the origin of cytogenetically unidentifiable marker chromosomes. It will also be useful in studies of evolutionary cytogenetics.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Constrained Markov networks for automated analysis of G-banded chromosomes.

Automated analysis of chromosome band patterns using probabilistic Markov networks has been reported in previous work. Band patterns are represented as strings of symbols. Inferred from a set of learning strings, a Markov network is a model of intraband and interband relations in these strings. The inference is entirely data-driven and is accomplished using dynamic programming. This paper presents a new model of chromosome band patterns, the constrained Markov network, which is a special case of its predecessor. Substantial experimental evidence of the superiority of the new model over the old is given in terms of equal results in centromere finding and improved results in classification for the 22 autosomes. Furthermore, a method for simplification of constrained Markov networks is shown to be of considerable importance with respect to computational complexity.

Centromere↗
PubMed1975

Mechanisms of chromosome banding. VII. Interaction of methylene blue with DNA and chromatin.

The binding of methylene blue to DNA and chromatin treated in various ways was examined by equilibrium dialysis. The maximum r value (moles of bound dye/mole of nucleotide) was 1.0 for DNA, 0.6 for unfixed chromatin, and 0.83 for chromatin fixed in methanol-acetic acid. When fixed chromatin was treated with saline-citrate at 60 degrees C for 3 hours, as used for G-banding chromosomes, the r value decreased from 0.83 to 0.55. When unfixed chromatin was treated as for R-banding the r values also dropped. Equilibrium dialysis indicated there was no disproportionate increase of dye binding as the concentration of DNA increased. -- These results, and others, suggest that some of the Giemsa negative regions of G- and R-banded chromosomes are due to the denaturation of non-histone proteins so that they more effectively cover the DNA and prevent side binding of the thiazin dyes.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Human AQP2 and MIP genes, two members of the MIP family, map within chromosome band 12q13 on the basis of two-color FISH.

The human AQP2 (collecting duct water channel, aquaporin 2) gene encodes a 271 amino acid protein and is a member of the MIP (major intrinsic protein of lens fiber) gene family. Using two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization on high-resolution R-banded chromosomes and human genomic DNA clones for AQP2 and MIP as probes, we found that both genes mapped closely within the human chromosome region 12q13.

Animals↗
PubMed1983

A simple and reliable method of chromosome banding for prenatal cytogenetics using a bromodeoxyuridine pulse.

An extremely simple, fully defined and reliable technique for banding chromosomes in situ is described. The method uses a pulse of bromodeoxyuridine to produce replication pattern banding complete with G- and C-type banding in the same karyotype. This enables immediate resolution of problems otherwise requiring extra subculturing and the application of conventional banding techniques. The value of routine chromosome banding in prenatal cytogenetics using such an economical technique is discussed.

Amniotic Fluid↗
PubMed1992

Detection of small, single-copy genes on protein-G-banded chromosomes by electron microscopy.

A method for the detection by electron microscopy of chromosome banding after in situ hybridization of small, nonradioactive DNA sequences is described. Typical high-resolution G-banding is produced by adding 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) during the last part of the S-phase and by applying a monoclonal antibody against the BrdU-substituted chromosome segments, followed by the addition of protein G, but no further treatment. A protocol for in situ hybridization of small, single-copy biotinylated DNA sequences and their detection by immunogold tagging on banded chromosomes is also described. This combined approach permits high-resolution mapping of small DNA sequences and should be useful in discriminating between neighboring DNA fragments.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed1991

Evident diversity of codon usage patterns of human genes with respect to chromosome banding patterns and chromosome numbers; relation between nucleotide sequence data and cytogenetic data.

The sequences of the human genome compiled in DNA databases are now about 10 megabase pairs (Mb), and thus the size of the sequences is several times the average size of chromosome bands at high resolution. By surveying this large quantity of data, it may be possible to clarify the global characteristics of the human genome, that is, correlation of gene sequence data (kb-level) to cytogenetic data (Mb-level). By extensively searching the GenBank database, we calculated codon usages in about 2000 human sequences. The highest G + C percentage at the third codon position was 97%, and that of about 250 sequences was 80% or more. The lowest G + C% was 27%, and that in about 150 sequences was 40% or less. A major portion of the GC-rich genes was found to be on special subsets of R-bands (T-bands and/or terminal R-bands). AT-rich genes, however, were mainly on G-bands or non-T-type internal R-bands. Average G + C% at the third position for individual chromosomes differed among chromosomes, and were related to T-band density, quinacrine dullness, and mitotic chiasmata density in the respective chromosomes.

Base Composition↗
PubMed1989

High resolution chromosome banding in the Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus.

High resolution banded chromosomes were prepared from a synchronized culture of rat fibroblasts. A maximum of 457 bands per haploid chromosome set were observed. This represents a two-fold increase when compared to the number of bands visualized in mid-metaphases using standard procedures. By reference to both G- and Q-banded karyotypes, we constructed improved idiograms of rat chromosomes at 300- and 400-band stages, respectively.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Balanced translocation in a neuroblastoma patient disrupts a cluster of small nuclear RNA U1 and tRNA genes in chromosomal band 1p36.

Chromosomal band 1p36 probably harbours several neuroblastoma suppressor genes. A neuroblastoma patient has been described with a constitutional balanced translocation, t(1;17)(p36;q12-21). Cytogenetically, no loss of chromosomal material was visible. The 1p36 translocation breakpoint could therefore have inactivated one allele of a tumour suppressor gene, thus predisposing the patient to develop neuroblastoma. We localized this breakpoint by pulsed field gel electrophoresis, analysis of yeast artificial chromosomes, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Here we report that the breakpoint is within a large cluster of small nuclear RNA U1 (RNU1) and some tRNA genes (TRE, TRN) on chromosomal band 1p36. The size of this cluster is over two megabases and it contains many other locally repeated sequences. Polyadenylated transcripts were identified for some of these sequences. In addition, the cluster is the target for integration of an adenovirus 5/SV40 hybrid virus. The translocation breakpoint maps distal of this viral integration site and proximal of marker PND.

Animals↗
PubMed1980

The interrelationship of chromosome banding patterns in the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca), hybrid bear (Ursus middendorfi X Thalarctos maritimus), and other carnivores.

The banded chromosomes of the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) and a hybrid bear (Ursus middendorfi X Thalarctos maritimus) have been studied and compared to those of other carnivores. The giant panda shares only a few apparently homologous chromosome arms with the bear (Ursidae) and equally few with the lesser panda, Ailurus fulgens (Procyonidae). Chromosomal evidence suggests appropriate placement of the giant panda in a family separate from the Uridae and the Procyonidae.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Human gp130 transducer chain gene (IL6ST) is localized to chromosome band 5q11 and possesses a pseudogene on chromosome band 17p11.

Human gp130 (IL6ST) is one of the most widely used chains of the cytokine receptor family. Indeed, it is involved in signal transduction of interleukin-6, interleukin-11, leukemia inhibitory factor, oncostatin M, and ciliary neurotrophic factor. In a previous report, IL6ST was assigned to chromosomes 5 and 17. Here we specify the chromosomal sublocalization of IL6ST and show that the sequence detected on 17p11 corresponds, in fact, to a nontranscribed pseudogene, whereas the active gene is located at chromosome band 5q11.

Antigens, CD↗
PubMed1975

Chromosome banding pattern conservatism in birds and nonhomology of chromosome banding patterns between birds, turtles, snakes and amphibians.

The G-banded karyotypes of 4 species of birds representing the orders Galliformes, Columbiformes and Musophagiformes were compared. Banding pattern homology between orders was limited t 5o 5 major chromosome arms and the Z chromosome. Even in these major chromosome arms pericentric and paracentric inversions produced alteration of the banding pattern sequences. Addition of constitutive heterochromatin was responsible for changes in banding patterns in the Z chromosome. The chromosome banding patterns of an emydid turtle, Terrepene carolina, 5 species of boid snakes of the genera Liasis, Acrantophis, and Sanzinia and the African clawed-frog. Xenopus muelleri, were also compared to the bird chromosome banding patterns. No homology was observed between any of these major groups: bird, snake, turtle, amphibian. However, intergroup homology was apparent. - The data obtained do not support reports of broad interordinal direct homology of the macrochromosomes of birds and refutes the idea of a primitive bird karyotype with 3 pairs of "Agroup' chromosomes and 3 pairs of "B group' chromosomes. - The major mechanisms responsible for chromosome evolution in birds appear to be centric and tandem fusions, paracentric and pericentric inversions, and addition or deletion of heterochromatin.

Animals↗