Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Choledocholithiasis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Association of periampullary diverticula with primary choledocholithiasis but not with secondary choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Several endoscopic studies have reported an association between periampullary diverticula and biliary calculi, but the results are inconsistent when the anatomic site of the stones is considered. The aims of our study are to evaluate the association between periampullary diverticula and gallstones according to their site and to clarify the origin of the common bile duct stones by analyzing their composition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a period of 10 months, 611 of 632 consecutive patients having endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were prospectively enrolled. The data about periampullary diverticula and gallstones were analyzed according to the site of the stones. The stones were initially grouped on the basis of their gross morphology and cross-sectional appearance, and finally analyzed by quantitative infrared spectroscopy. RESULTS: Diverticula were found in 165 of 611 cases (27%) and the incidence increased with age (p<0.01). The incidence of gallbladder or common bile duct stones was higher in patients with periampullary diverticula (73/165,44%) than without (130/446,29%) (p<0.01). Considering the site of the gallstones, this significance was found only in patients with common bile duct stones not associated with gallbladder stones (p<0.001). Of the 40 who had gallstones only in the common bile duct, 32 gave a history of cholecystectomy more than two years previously and had been free of symptoms postoperatively, and on analysis most of the stones (30/36,83%) were brown pigment stones. These therefore were assumed to be primary common bile duct stones. The common bile duct stones with associated gallbladder stones were identical to their paired gallbladder stones in gross and cross-sectional appearance and chemical composition. They were assumed to be secondary common bile duct stones and the difference in the incidence of calculi according to the presence of diverticula was not significant. CONCLUSION: The incidence of gallstones was significantly higher in periampullary diverticula, and when the site and the origin of the gallstones was considered the association between diverticula and gallstones was significant in patients with primary common bile duct stones but not with the secondary ones.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective single-center study on the short-term and long-term treatment results in 483 patients.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is the method of choice for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of various prognostic factors on the short-term and long-term results of EST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 483 EST procedures carried out due to choledocholithiasis without concomitant neoplasms or hepatic cirrhosis, and without subsequent bile duct surgery, were analyzed prospectively. The 324 patients (67%) who agreed to take part in the follow-up examinations and fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the study were divided into four groups, depending on the presence of the gallbladder or cholecystolithiasis prior to EST and on the time of diagnosis, and were prospectively followed up by physical examination laboratory tests, abdominal ultrasound, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography examinations to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: EST was successful in 95.7% of cases. Early complications were noted in 6.8% of cases. No early complications were seen in the group after cholecystectomy with a T-tube present, whereas this rate was highest in the group with concurrent choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis (six of 48, 12.5%). Recurrent choledocholithiasis was observed in 5.6% of the cases overall. This rate was at its lowest in patients with choledocholithiasis alone, and was highest in the group with concurrent choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis. Among the latter patients, the highest rates of papillary stenosis, chronic pancreatitis, and cholangitis were also observed, the latter complication being noted only in cases of recurrent common bile duct stones. CONCLUSIONS: EST is a relatively safe and effective procedure in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. The best prognostic factor is the presence of choledocholithiasis alone. Concurrent choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis carry a more adverse prognosis, and in these cases cholecystectomy should be considered after EST.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The efficacy of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the detection and clearance of choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography has been reported to have a high success rate in the detection and treatment of choledocholithiasis. Although there is growing enthusiasm for laparoscopic common bile duct clearance, many patients who present with gallbladder disease and suspected choledocholithiasis have endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography performed with choledocholithiasis cleared if detected. These patients are then referred for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis and clearance of bile duct stones at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients at this institution who underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy from January 1997 through July 1998. RESULTS: Common bile duct stones were detected endoscopically in 12 of 17 (71%) patients. We found serum bilirubin level to be the best predictor of choledocholithiasis. In 12 of 12 procedures, the endoscopist performed an endoscopic sphincterotomy with stone extraction and reported a fully cleared common bile duct. Intraoperative cholangiogram performed during subsequent cholecystectomy revealed choledocholithiasis in 4 of these 12 patients. Laparoscopic techniques successfully cleared the choledocholithiasis in 3 of these patients with open techniques necessary in the fourth. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that even after presumed successful endoscopic clearance of the bile duct stones, many patients (33% in our series) still have choledocholithiasis present at the time of cholecystectomy. We recommend intraoperative cholangiography at the time of cholecystectomy even after presumed successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with further intervention, preferably laparoscopic, to clear the choledocholithiasis as deemed necessary.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Predicting the presence of choledocholithiasis in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis.

OBJECTIVES: Accurate preoperative prediction of choledocholithiasis is essential in order to minimize patient risk and curtail health care expenditures. This study was designed to identify independent risk factors for choledocholithiasis in patients who had undergone cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis and to develop a predictive model based on those factors. METHODS: The charts of 1264 consecutive patients who had undergone cholecystectomy at one of three North Carolina hospitals between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 1991 were reviewed; 465 of these patients had confirmed presence or absence of choledocholithiasis by cholangiography and/or common bile duct exploration and were eligible for analysis. Candidate predictor variables included age and maximum preoperative values for each of the following: temperature, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, AST, amylase, white blood cell count, and common bile duct diameter. Model development and validation were conducted using standard data-splitting (60% "training," 40% "test") and logistic regression techniques. RESULTS: Choledocholithiasis was confirmed in 115 (25%) of the 465 eligible patients. Univariate analysis identified bilirubin, common bile duct diameter, AST, temperature, alkaline phosphatase, and age as predictors. Multivariable analysis subsequently identified bilirubin, common bile duct diameter, AST, alkaline phosphatase, and age as independent predictors of choledocholithiasis. A final model containing these variables (except age, whose contribution to the model was small) accurately predicted choledocholithiasis (c-index = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate estimates of choledocholithiasis risk can be made using maximum preoperative bilirubin, common bile duct diameter, AST, and alkaline phosphatase values. Use of the model may help physicians select those patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis who would most likely benefit from further investigation to exclude choledocholithiasis.

Case-Control Studies↗
PubMed1997

Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparative study with ultrasonography and computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the diagnostic usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for choledocholithiasis. METHODS: A prospective series of 155 patients with suspected choledocholithiasis all underwent EUS, conventional ultrasonography, CT, and ERCP. In 142 patients with a clear cholangiogram on ERCP, we analyzed the capability of EUS to image the extrahepatic bile duct and to identify choledocholithiasis, compared with ultrasonography and CT. RESULTS: No complications were encountered in performing EUS. In 51 patients, ERCP demonstrated bile duct stones, which were confirmed at endoscopic sphincterotomy or surgery. The extrahepatic bile duct was wholly displayed in 96% by EUS, in 60% by ultrasonography, and in 80% by CT. EUS (96%) was more sensitive than ultrasonography (63%) and CT (71%) for detecting choledocholithiasis (p < 0.001). Although ultrasonography and CT were poorly diagnostic for choledocholithiasis in patients with small stones or those with a nondilated common bile duct, EUS was able to accurately detect choledocholithiasis regardless of the size of stones or the diameter of the bile duct. The specificity of EUS (100%) was higher than those of ultrasonography (95%) and CT (97%). CONCLUSIONS: EUS, a safe imaging procedure, is more accurate than ultrasonography and CT and may be as accurate as ERCP for diagnosing choledocholithiasis.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

[The value of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the expedient diagnosis of choledocholithiasis].

INTRODUCTION: Management of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis is vitally influenced by dilated biliary tract and choledocholithiasis. The objectives of this prospective pilot study were to evaluate the diagnostic value of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) compared to diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and to establish an efficient algorithm for diagnostics and treatment of choledocholithiasis. METHODS: All consecutive patients with cholecystolithiasis and dilated biliary tract proven by sonography as well as elevated liver function tests were enrolled within 12 months. Patients without evidence of bile duct calculi underwent preoperative MRC, whereas patients with choledocholithiasis immediate ERC. RESULTS: 58 patients (30 male, 28 female) with a median age of 59.4 years underwent preoperative MRC. In 18 patients (10 male, 8 female; median age 63.5 years) with evidence of choledocholithiasis we subsequently performed ERC and papillotomy. Bile duct stones were detected and removed after papillotomy in 10 patients, whereas calculi could not be found anymore in 8 patients. The remaining 40 patients without calculi evident on MRC were transferred to magnetic resonance tomography and ERC in case of suspected malignancy or to cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), which could definitely exclude choledocholithiasis. In comparison to ERC respectively IOC, MRC was able to detect bile duct stones with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 83.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive MRC seems to replace diagnostic ERC concerning the presence of choledocholithiasis in case of cholecystolithiasis and dilated biliary tract with a high sensitivity. The preoperative ERC with stone extraction is still the therapy of choice in case of radiologically confirmed choledocholithiasis.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to examine the long-term prognosis of after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis, including the recurrence of lithiasis, and to thereby determine the best treatment modality for choledocholithiasis based on its pathological entity. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Choledocholithiasis can be caused by either primary bile duct stones that originate in the bile duct or by secondary bile duct stones that have fallen out of the gallbladder. The recurrence rates vary depending on the type of choledocholithiasis. METHODS: Two-hundred thirteen outpatients who were treated for choledocholithiasis from 1982 to 1996 were selected as subjects and monitored for a period ranging from 5 to 19 years (mean, 9.6 years). The 213 patients were divided into 3 groups: 87 patients who had undergone choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage (including the use of the laparoscopic method), 44 patients who had undergone choledochoduodenostomy, and 82 patients whose stones were removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). Recurrence of lithiasis was examined for each type of treatment modality. RESULTS: Choledochoduodenostomy was performed in 44 cases for the purpose of preventing any recurrence. The recurrent rate was analyzed in 169 cases. Choledocholithiasis recurred in 17 of the 169 cases (10.1%). The remaining 152 patients that showed no recurrence of lithiasis were examined and compared. The diameter of the common bile duct measured during the initial treatment was more dilated in patients with recurrent lithiasis (16.6 +/- 5.9 mm) than in patients without any recurrence (9.8 +/- 4.9 mm; P < 0.05). Peripapillary diverticula were observed in 10 of the 17 patients with recurrent lithiasis (58.8%), and in 34 of the 152 nonrecurrent patients (22.3%), showing that diverticula were more common in recurrent cases (P < 0.05). Furthermore, while primary bile duct stones were found in 11 of the 17 cases with recurrent lithiasis (64.7%), primary stones were found in only 37 of the 152 nonrecurrent patients (24.3%), showing primary bile duct stones were also more common in recurrent patients (P < 0.05). The recurrent patients were examined by surgical procedure. Nine patients with choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage had a recurrence (10.3%), and 8 patients in the EST group had a recurrence (9.8%). The recurrence rates for these procedures were higher than for cases with choledochoduodenostomy (recurrence rate: 0%, P < 0.05). In particular, lithiasis recurred in 5 of the 12 patients with T-tube drainage for primary bile duct stones (41.7%). CONCLUSION: Although choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage, including open and laparoscopic surgery, is presently a common procedure for choledocholithiasis, this procedure will not necessarily prevent a recurrence of the disease. For older patients with primary bile duct stones, choledochoduodenostomy or EST is recommended.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in choledocholithiasis and to determine whether use of MRCP may eliminate the need for purely diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 116 patients with suspected biliopancreatic pathology were studied prospectively between November 1996 and February 1998. Choledocholithiasis was initially suspected in 61 patients and rated before ERCP and MRCP as being of low, intermediate, or high probability based on clinical, laboratory, and/or imaging findings (Cotton criteria). RESULTS: The sensitivity of choledocholithiasis diagnosis was 91%, with a global efficacy of 90%. The level of duct stone obstruction was visualized in all patients. Suprastenotic dilatation also showed a good correlation to ERCP. Choledocholithiasis was found in 32 patients (65%) and 3 patients (33%) in the high- and intermediate-probability groups, respectively. None of the low-probability patients had choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed for only a diagnostic (not therapeutic) purpose in 3 patients (6%) and 2 patients (22%) of the high- and intermediate-probability cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography seems to be effective in diagnosing choledocholithiasis. It plays a fundamental role in patients with a low or intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis, contributing to the avoidance of purely diagnostic ERCP.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Ultrasound in choledocholithiasis.

Twenty-five patients of obstructive jaundice due to choledocholithiasis, were prospectively evaluated by ultrasonography and cholangiography. Ultrasound could demonstrate choledocholithiasis in 10 patients (40%). Choledocholithiasis in non-dilated ducts could be demonstrated only in one patient. All cases were diagnosed by cholangiography. Ultrasound, though an accepted modality of choice for diagnosing cholelithiasis, has a limited role in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Ultrasonography (USG) is the screening modality of choice to distinguish obstructive from non-obstructive jaundice. It is highly accurate in the diagnosis of cholelithiasis but its role in detection of choledocholithiasis is less clear. Choledocholithiasis complicates 10% of all cases of cholecystitis and occurs in 2-4% of postcholecystectomy patients. The present study deals with the diagnostic value of USG in cases of choledocholithiasis subjected to USG prior to cholangiography and surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Management of choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

The development of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rekindled the issue of management of choledocholithiasis. A number of options exist including pre or postoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP-ES), laparoscopic common duct exploration or open common duct exploration. We present here our experience with the management of choledocholithiasis in patients treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. From January 1991 to January 1995, 900 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 71 ERCP were carried out in 71 patients with suspicion or evidence of choledocholithiasis. Common duct stones were detected in 44 patients. Preoperative ERCP was done in 56 patients, with suspicion of choledocholithiasis, based on clinical, laboratory or ultrasonographic findings. 29 of these patients (51.7%) had common duct stones, that were successfully removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy. One patient suffered mild pancreatitis and a second one had transient hyperamylasemia. Postoperative ERCP was performed in 15 patients. Indications for ERCP were the evidence of common duct stones in intraoperative cholangiography in 7 cases, and clinical or laboratory suspicion of choledocholithiasis, 3 months to 3 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Stones were detected in 100% of the patients. In 11 patients (73.3%), the stones were extracted by endoscopic sphincterotomy and 4 patients underwent open common duct exploration. Two patients had transient hyperamylasemia. ERCP is a safe and effective method for detection and treatment of common duct stones. ERCP prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients suspected of having choledocholithiasis, is safe and offers with good results. Rutinary intraoperative cholangiography is recommended, for the detection of unsuspected choledocholithiasis and as an effective treatment (postoperative-ERCP, open or laparoscopic common duct exploration) can be chosen depending on surgeon's skills and patient's characteristics.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis: a prospective evaluation in 247 consecutive unselected patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evaluation of the feasibility and results of the one-stage treatment combining routine intraoperative cholangiography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicentric (5 centers-9 surgeons) prospective study in 247 consecutive patients (mean age 68 years; range 21-92) during a 50-month period (November 1991-December 1995). Laparoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis was attempted irrespective of the circumstances leading to the diagnosis of biliary lithiasis or the preoperative suspicion of choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: One out of four patients (n = 61) had unsuspected choledocholithiasis disclosed by routine intraoperative cholangiography. A laparoscopic complete clearance of choledocholithiasis was achieved in 208 of 236 attempted cases (88%), with either transcystic duct extraction (n = 116) or choledochotomy (n = 92). Open surgery was required in 20 patients for failure of laparoscopic treatment and in 3 patients despite successful extraction. Twenty-one of 25 patients (84%) referred for failure of retrograde endoscopic stone extraction had successful laparoscopic choledocholithiasis clearance. The mean duration for the laparoscopic transcystic approach and choledochotomy were 108 min (range 50-300) and 173 min (range 70-480), respectively. Eleven patients had retained stones (4.4%). Minor and major complications were recorded in 9 and 22 patients respectively. The operative mortality was 0.4% (95% confidence interval: 0-1.2%). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration when required should be considered as the simplest and most efficient treatment for choledocholithiasis. The multicenter character of this study including consecutive patients from public and private practices, strengthens our conclusions and is consistent with a wide diffusion of this diagnostic and therapeutic strategy.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.

AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis in a large group of patients with bile duct stones confirmed at direct cholangiography. Also, to compare bile duct stones confirmed at direct cholangiography. Also, to compare bile duct stone characteristics using the three different investigations, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), MRCP and US. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 191 patients (M:F, 76:115; mean age, 66 years; range, 24-92 years) were investigated by direct cholangiography, MRCP and US. Their final diagnosis as determined at direct cholangiography were choledocholithiasis (n = 34), strictures (n = 47) and normal ducts (n = 110). The direct cholangiographic methods used for diagnosis of choledocholithiasis were ERCP (n = 29), intraoperative cholangiography (n = 3) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (n = 2). The bile duct stone characteristics were compared using ERCP, MRCP and US in the 29 patients in whom stones were exclusively diagnosed by ERCP. RESULTS: Compared with the final diagnosis, MRCP had a sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 91%, 98% and 97%, respectively, in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. MRCP resulted in three false-negative and three false-positive findings, four of which occurred due to confusion with lesions at the ampulla. US had a sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 38%, 100% and 89%, respectively, in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. ERCP diagnosed more stones and the stones were more proximally distributed within the bile duct at ERCP when compared with MRCP. CONCLUSION: MRCP has a high diagnostic accuracy (97%), similar to that at direct cholangiography, in the diagnosis of choloedocholithiasis. It has the potential to replace diagnostic ERCP and select patients with choledocholithiasis for therapeutic ERCP.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Long-term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis with cholecystolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Although endoscopic papillotomy is now considered established treatment for choledocholithiasis, therapeutic results of endoscopic papillotomy alone without subsequent cholecystectomy in patients with cholecystolithiasis have not been well evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy for these patients. METHODS: Patients admitted with choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis from 1976 to 1993 were studied retrospectively. Of 385 patients in whom the bile duct was cleared by endoscopic papillotomy and endoscopic stone extraction, 371 patients (195 men and 176 women; mean age 65.4 years) were followed. Predisposing risk factors for late complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 7.7 years. Cholecystitis and recurrence of choledocholithiasis as late complications occurred in 22 cases (5.9%) and 36 cases (9.7%), respectively. Cholecystitis, including 1 severe case, resolved with conservative treatment. Recurrent choledocholithiasis was successfully treated endoscopically except in 1 case. No significant risk factors were identified for cholecystitis. The presence of pneumobilia (p = 0.0016) and the need for lithotripsy (p = 0.0342) were found to be significant risk factors for the recurrence of choledocholithiasis. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy in patients with choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis was found to be relatively favorable. Cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillotomy is not always necessary in the management of cholecystolithiasis.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Sequential endoscopic/laparoscopic management of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis in children who have sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis are common complications of sickle cell disease (SCD). With the recent advances in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), which has been used successfully for the management of cholelithiasis in children who have SCD, exclusion of choledocholithiasis before LC is of great importance. METHODS: Eighteen children who had SCD, cholelithiasis, and choledocholithiasis were treated at our hospital. Seven were treated with open cholecystectomy (OC) and common bile duct (CBD) exploration, and two were treated with transduodenal sphincteroplasty. The remaining 11 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), sphincterotomy, and stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). RESULTS: A dilated CBD noted on ultrasound, elevated alkaline phosphatase, elevated total bilirubin of more than 5 mg/dL, history of pancreatitis, either singly or in combination, should raise suspicion of choledocholithiasis, and these patients together with those who have choledocholithiasis detected on ultrasound should undergo ERCP to confirm and extract the stones before LC. CONCLUSION: This sequential approach of endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction followed by LC is a safe and effective approach for the management of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis in children who have SCD.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: To reduce the rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy, and to avoid retained bile duct stones, it is essential to detect choledocholithiasis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness and safety of performing endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-two patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were evaluated prospectively using standard abdominal ultrasonography (US), US plus EUS, and US plus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) for the detection of choledocholithiasis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (21.2%) had choledocholithiasis, and six patients with common bile duct stones had normal-sized ducts on US. The common bile duct was successfully examined in all patients using EUS, but only in 65.9% of patients when US was used and 94.7% of patients when ERC was used. US plus EUS detected choledocholithiasis in 25 of 28 patients (89.3%), US in 19 of 28 patients (67.9%), and US plus ERC in 26 of 28 patients (92.9%). While no complications as a result of EUS were encountered, complications resulting from ERC occurred in seven patients (5.3%), including cholecystitis in two patients, cholangitis in three patients, and pancreatitis in two patients. In view of the complication and failure rates, EUS appears to offer significant advantages over ERC. These results suggest that EUS is more sensitive than standard abdominal ultrasonography, and as sensitive as ERC. CONCLUSIONS: EUS appears to be as sensitive as, and safer than, ERC in the detection of choledocholithiasis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗
PubMed2001

Detection of choledocholithiasis by EUS in acute pancreatitis: a prospective evaluation in 100 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: ERCP is the standard for detection of choledocholithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis, and, if performed early, ERCP decreases morbidity. However, there are procedure-related complications. The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the ability of EUS to detect choledocholithiasis in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis. METHODS: The study group comprised 100 consecutive patients who presented with acute pancreatitis. EUS, and immediately thereafter, ERCP were performed by separate blinded examiners within 24 hours of admission. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS in identifying gallbladder stones was compared with that of transcutaneous US. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS in detecting choledocholithiasis was then compared with that of US and ERCP based on the results of endoscopic instrumentation of the bile duct after sphincterotomy. RESULTS: EUS was more sensitive than US in detecting gallbladder stones (100% vs. 84%, p < 0.005). The sensitivities of ERCP and EUS for choledocholithiasis were both 97%, and the overall accuracies were 96% and 98%, respectively, with no significant difference. EUS detected the absence of choledocholithiasis in 65 of 66 patients (specificity = 98%). Endosonographic examination was successful in all patients, whereas ERCP was unsuccessful in 5 patients (p > 0.05). Post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding developed in 4 patients; there was no EUS-related morbidity (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: EUS is more sensitive than US in detecting biliary stones in patients with acute pancreatitis. It is as accurate as ERCP in detecting choledocholithiasis. EUS can be used to select patients with acute pancreatitis who require therapeutic ERCP, thus avoiding diagnostic ERCP and its associated potential for complications in the majority of patients.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Magnetic resonance cholangiography using half-Fourier acquisition for diagnosing choledocholithiasis.

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC), using a half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) sequence, noninvasively provides very rapid (1-2 s) and high-quality images of the biliary tract. We assessed the diagnostic usefulness of HASTE-MRC for choledocholithiasis. METHODS: A total of 101 patients with suspected choledocholithiasis underwent MRC, ultrasonography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In 97 patients in whom ERCP fully depicted the common bile duct, we retrospectively analyzed the capability of MRC to image the common bile duct and to diagnose choledocholithiasis, in comparison with that of ultrasonography. RESULTS: In 34 patients, ERCP demonstrated bile duct stones, which were confirmed at endoscopic or surgical treatment. The common bile duct was fully delineated in 98% by MRC and in 70% by ultrasonography. MRC (91%) was more sensitive than ultrasonography (71%) for detecting choledocholithiasis (p < 0.05). MRC demonstrated bile duct stones in all patients with stones > or =11 mm but missed calculi in the 29% of patients with small (3-5 mm) stones. MRC was capable of detecting choledocholithiasis regardless of bile duct caliber. The specificity of MRC (100%) was higher than that of ultrasonography (95%). CONCLUSION: HASTE-MRC, a fast and noninvasive procedure, can accurately diagnose choledocholithiasis although the detectability for small stones is limited.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗
PubMed1992

[Long-term results of endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of residual/recurrent choledocholithiasis].

Endoscopic sphincterotomy is widely accepted as the technique of choice in the treatment of residual or recidivant choledocholithiasis since the results obtained with this technique are favorable when compared to biliary surgery in most series. However, the experience of long term follow up of patients with choledocholithiasis in whom this technique would have been applied as the only treatment is still scarce up to date. We have studied 40 patients (mean age 65.6 +/- 11.1 years) with residual or recidivant choledocholithiasis who had undergone endoscopic treatment successfully before the 30th of June 1985, who could be contacted by a mailed questionnaire or by phone by August 1990. The follow up time 70.7 +/- 19.4 months (mean +/- typical deviation). Out of them, 36 (90%) had been asymptomatic up to the contact date (30 cases) or up to death due to causes not related to biliary pathology (6 patients). Out of the 4 remaining patients, 2 presented mild dyspepsia and another patient has probably developed recidivant choledocholithiasis (according to I.V. cholangiography). The fourth patient presented a severe episode of cholangitis and acute pancreatitis, related to a new episode of choledocholithiasis and died 5 and a half years after the endoscopic sphincterectomy. This represents a 2.5% mortality. These long term results of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with residual or recidivant choledocholithiasis are an other point in favour of using this technique as the single treatment of choice in patients above 60 years old.

Adult↗