Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cetirizine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Inhibitory effects of orally or sublingually administered cetirizine on histamine-induced weals and flares and their correlation with cetirizine plasma concentrations.

In an open, randomized crossover study, the inhibition of histamine-induced weals and flares after one dose of 10 mg cetirizine administered orally or sublingually to seven healthy volunteers was compared. Formation of both weals and flares was significantly inhibited by cetirizine administered by either route; weals were inhibited as early as 20 min after oral intake but not clearly inhibited until 90 min after sublingual intake. There was no clinically relevant difference between the effects of the two routes of administration on flare area. Cetirizine was not well tolerated when given sublingually: two patients reported a burning sensation in the tongue and one reported a local anaesthetic effect. Plasma cetirizine concentrations showed no clear difference between the two routes of administration.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Absorption and disposition of levocetirizine, the eutomer of cetirizine, administered alone or as cetirizine to healthy volunteers.

The primary objective of the present study was to compare the absorption and disposition of levocetirizine, the eutomer of cetirizine, when administered alone (10 mg) or in presence of the distomer. An additional objective was also to investigate the configurational stability of levocetirizine in vivo in humans. The study was performed in a randomized, two-way cross-over, single-dose design with a wash-out phase of 7 days between the two periods. A total of 12 healthy male and 12 healthy female volunteers were included in the study. Bioequivalence can be concluded from the analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameters of levocetirizine when administered alone or as the racemate cetirizine. No chiral inversion occurs in humans when levocetirizine is administered, i.e. there is no formation of the distomer. When comparing the pharmacokinetic characteristics of levocetirizine and the distomer, the apparent volume of distribution of the eutomer is significantly smaller than that of the distomer (0.41 and 0.60 L/kg, respectively). For an H1-antagonist a small distribution volume can be considered as a positive aspect, both in terms of efficacy and safety. Moreover the non-renal clearance of levocetirizine is also significantly lower than that of the distomer (9.70 and 28.70 mL/min, respectively), which constitutes an additional positive aspect particularly as far as metabolism-based drug interactions are concerned. The information collected in the present study on the pharmacokinetics of levocetirizine and the distomer provide additional reasons for eliminating the distomer and developing levocetirizine as an improvement on cetirizine.

Absorption↗
PubMed2004

Randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing fluticasone aqueous nasal spray in mono-therapy, fluticasone plus cetirizine, fluticasone plus montelukast and cetirizine plus montelukast for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are considered to be particularly effective in reducing nasal congestion and are therefore recommended as first-line treatment in allergic rhinitis patients with moderate to severe and/or persistent symptoms. OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) 200 microg given once daily, administered in mono-therapy or combined therapy with a H1 receptor antagonist (cetirizine, CTZ) or with a leukotriene antagonist (montelukast, MSK), and the combined therapy of CTZ plus MSK in the treatment of patients affected by allergic rhinitis to Parietaria during natural pollen exposure. In addition, we examined the effect of the treatment on eosinophil counts and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in nasal lavage performed at beginning of season, during season and at the end of the season. METHODS: One hundred patients aged 12-50 years (mean+/-SD 31.8+/-9.6) with a history of moderate to severe Parietaria pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis were selected. A randomized, double-blind, double dummy, placebo (PLA)-controlled, parallel-group study design was used. Patients were treated FPANS 200 microg once daily (n=20) or with FPANS 200 microg once daily, plus CTZ (10 mg) in the morning (n=20), or with FPANS 200 microg once daily, plus MSK (10 mg) in the evening (n=20) or with CTZ (10 mg) in the morning plus MSK in the evening (n=20) or matched PLA (n=20). Assessment of efficacy was based on scores of daily nasal symptoms and on eosinophil counts and ECP in nasal lavage. RESULTS: All treatments showed significant differences (P<0.001) compared with PLA in terms of total symptom, rhinorrhea, sneezing and nasal itching scores. Concerning nasal congestion on waking and daily only the groups treated with FPANS in mono-therapy or in combined therapy showed significant differences compared with PLA. Comparing the group treated with FPANS alone and the groups treated with FPANS plus CTZ, we found significant differences for total symptom score (P=0.04) and for nasal itching (P=0.003). The comparison between FPANS plus CTZ and FPANS plus MSK showed significant difference for nasal itching (P=0.003). Finally, there were significant differences between the group treated with FPANS and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK for total symptom score (P=0.009), for nasal congestion on waking (P<0.001) and nasal congestion daily (P<0.001). Also the comparisons between the group treated with FPANS plus CTZ and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK demonstrated significant differences (P<0.001) for total symptom, for nasal congestion on waking and for nasal congestion on daily, for rhinorrhea (P=0.04) and for nasal itching (P=0.003) scores. Concerning the comparison between the group treated with FPANS plus MSK and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK we found significant differences for total symptom score (P=0.005), for nasal congestion on waking (P<0.001) and for nasal congestion on daily (P<0.001). No other differences were observed between the groups. Concerning blood eosinophil counts, significant differences were found between the treatments with FPANS in mono-therapy or in combined therapy with PLA group during and at the end of the season (P=0.0003 and P<0.0001, respectively). Concerning eosinophils and ECP in nasal lavage, all treatments showed significant differences (P<0.001) compared with PLA. Besides, there were significant differences (P<0.001) between the groups treated with FPANS alone or in combined therapy and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK. CONCLUSION: The results of this comparative study demonstrate that FPANS is highly effective for treating patients affected by allergic rhinitis, with efficacy exceeding that of CTZ plus MSK in combined therapy. In addition, the regular combined therapy of FPANS plus CTZ or plus MSK would not seem to offer substantial advantage with respect to FPANS in mono-therapy in patients affected by seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Acetates↗
PubMed1989

Cetirizine: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group 5-week study, cetirizine, 5 mg or 10 mg daily, was ingested by 10 and nine children, respectively. Cetirizine was rapidly absorbed with mean peak cetirizine concentrations of 427.6 +/- SD, 144.2 ng/ml, 1.4 +/- 1.1 hours after the 5 mg dose, and 978.4 +/- 340.6 ng/ml, 0.8 +/- 0.4 hours after the 10 mg dose. The dose-independent serum-elimination half-life of cetirizine was 7.1 +/- 1.6 hours after cetirizine, 5 mg, and 6.9 +/- 1.6 hours after cetirizine, 10 mg. Urinary excretion of unchanged cetirizine during 24 hours after the initial dose of cetirizine, 5 mg, was 40 +/- 15%, and after cetirizine, 10 mg, it was 39 +/- 14%. The mean histamine-induced wheal-and-flare areas were significantly suppressed from 1 to 24 hours after the first dose of cetirizine, 5 mg, and from 1/2 to 24 hours after the first dose of cetirizine, 10 mg, compared to the mean predose wheal-and-flare areas (p less than 0.01). During daily dosing with cetirizine, 5 mg or 10 mg at bedtime for 35 days, serum cetirizine concentrations and suppression of histamine-induced wheals and flares were monitored every 7 days, 12 hours after the cetirizine dose. The mean serum cetirizine concentrations remained relatively stable during this time, and the mean wheal-and-flare areas remained significantly suppressed (p less than 0.01) compared to baseline wheal-and-flare areas measured before the first dose of cetirizine. The symptoms and signs of allergic rhinitis were suppressed throughout the study by cetirizine, 5 mg and 10 mg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cetirizine↗
PubMed1995

Comparison of the bronchodilatory effects of cetirizine, albuterol, and both together versus placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

BACKGROUND: Many potential users of the H1 antihistamine cetirizine are asthmatic and may be using inhaled albuterol. This study was conducted to assess the possible bronchodilatory effect of cetirizine in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma and to determine whether cetirizine interacts with albuterol. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, the effects on pulmonary function of 5, 10, and 20 mg oral doses of cetirizine with and without inhaled albuterol (180 micrograms) were determined in 12 patients at 11 time points over 8 hours. The primary measure of efficacy was forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). RESULTS: Cetirizine with or without albuterol significantly increased FEV1, peak expiratory flow rate, and forced expiratory flow rate between 25% and 75% of vital capacity relative to baseline and placebo but did not have a significant effect on forced vital capacity. The effect of 20 mg of cetirizine on FEV1 was generally greater than that of 10 or 5 mg, but the difference was statistically significant only at the 30-minute time point (p < 0.05). All three cetirizine doses produced significantly greater increases than placebo in FEV1 and forced expiratory flow rate between 25% and 75% of vital capacity for 8 hours and in peak expiratory flow rate for 7 hours (p < 0.02). Albuterol alone had a significant effect on the four pulmonary function variables from 1 to 5 hours after baseline (p < 0.05), which is consistent with albuterol's recommended dosing frequency of every 4 to 6 hours. Albuterol alone increased FEV1 significantly more than 5 mg of cetirizine alone but not 10 mg or 20 mg of cetirizine alone at 60, 90, and 120 minutes after baseline, but all three doses of cetirizine increased FEV1 significantly more than albuterol 7 and 8 hours after baseline (p < 0.05), indicating that the bronchodilatory action of cetirizine lasts longer than that of albuterol. Cetirizine neither potentiated nor inhibited the bronchodilatory action of albuterol, but the two drugs appeared to have an additive bronchodilatory effect. None of the cetirizine treatments caused a worsening of pulmonary function, and all were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Cetirizine has a significant bronchodilatory effect in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma and can be used to treat concomitant conditions (e.g., allergic rhinitis) without concern that it will interfere with the bronchodilatory effect of albuterol or cause worsening of asthma by itself.

Albuterol↗
PubMed2004

Cetirizine: a review of its use in allergic disorders.

UNLABELLED: Cetirizine is a selective, second-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist, with a rapid onset, a long duration of activity and low potential for interaction with drugs metabolised by the hepatic cytochrome P450 system. Cetirizine was generally more effective than other H1 receptor antagonists at inhibiting histamine-induced wheal and flare responses. Cetirizine is an effective and well tolerated agent for the treatment of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) in adult, adolescent and paediatric patients. In adults with these allergic disorders, cetirizine was as effective as conventional dosages of ebastine (SAR, PAR, CIU), fexofenadine (SAR), loratadine (SAR, CIU) or mizolastine (SAR). This agent was significantly more effective, and with a more rapid onset of action, than loratadine in 2-day studies in environmental exposure units (SAR). In paediatric patients, cetirizine was as at least as effective as chlorphenamine (chlorpheniramine) [SAR], loratadine (SAR, PAR) and oxatomide (CIU) in the short term, and more effective than oxatomide and ketotifen (PAR) in the long term. Cetirizine was effective in reducing symptoms of allergic asthma in adults and reduced the relative risk of developing asthma in infants with atopic dermatitis sensitised to grass pollen or house dust mite allergens. It had a corticosteroid-sparing effect in infants with severe atopic dermatitis and was effective in ameliorating reactions to mosquito bites in adults. Cetirizine was well tolerated in adults, adolescents and paediatric patients with allergic disorders. In adult, adolescent and paediatric patients aged 2-11 years, the incidence of somnolence with cetirizine was dose related and was generally similar to that with other second-generation H1 receptor antagonists. Although, its sedative effect was greater than that of fexofenadine in some clinical trials and that of loratadine or fexofenadine in a postmarketing surveillance study. In infants aged 6-24 months, the tolerability profile of cetirizine was similar to that of placebo. Cetirizine did not have any adverse effects on cognitive function in adults, or cognitive function, behaviour or achievement of psychomotor milestones in paediatric patients. Cetirizine was not associated with cardiotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Cetirizine is well established in the treatment of symptoms of SAR, PAR or CIU. It demonstrated a corticosteroid-sparing effect and reduced the relative risk of developing asthma in sensitised infants with atopic dermatitis. Cetirizine was effective in the treatment of allergic cough and mosquito bites; however, its precise role in these indications has yet to be clearly established. On the basis of its favourable efficacy and tolerability profile and rapid onset of action, cetirizine provides an important option for the treatment of a wide range of allergic disorders.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Measurement of interstitial cetirizine concentrations in human skin: correlation of drug levels with inhibition of histamine-induced skin responses.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to measure the concentrations of cetirizine in the extracellular water compartment in intact human skin and assess simultaneously inhibition of histamine-induced wheal and flare reactions. METHODS: Skin cetirizine levels were collected by the microdialysis technique and analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry detection. Skin levels in 20 subjects were compared to plasma levels for 4 h after a single oral dose of 10 or 20 mg of cetirizine. Skin prick tests were performed with histamine 100 mg/ml. RESULTS: Plasma cetirizine levels increased within 30 min to reach peak values of 315+/-10 and 786+/-45 ng/ml 90-120 min after administration of 10 and 20 mg of cetirizine. This was followed by a slow decline. In the skin, dialysate cetirizine levels (non-protein-bound fraction only) peaked at 1.6+/-0.1 and 2.4+/-0.3 ng/ml at 120-180 min. In vivo recovery of cetirizine was 14.4+/-4.3%. It was estimated that the non-protein-bound concentration of cetirizine in the skin was 50-70% of corresponding plasma values. Both 10- and 20-mg doses of cetirizine inhibited wheal and flare reactions over 240 min. The time vs concentration profile of cetirizine in skin dialysate paralleled the inhibition of skin reactions, but no significant correlations were found between individual cetirizine levels in skin or plasma with wheal and flare reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Cetirizine concentrations in the skin could be monitored by the microdialysis technique. The results indicate no simple linear correlation between cetirizine skin levels and inhibition of skin reactions.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A randomized, double-blind, crossover comparison among cetirizine, levocetirizine, and ucb 28557 on histamine-induced cutaneous responses in healthy adult volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Cetirizine is a highly efficacious and long-acting second-generation H1-receptor antagonist for the treatment of allergic diseases, such as allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria, in adults and children. Pharmacologic studies have demonstrated that cetirizine, a racemate mixture composed of equal amounts of two enantiomers, does not undergo hepatic metabolism to any significant level. The enantiomers are excreted mainly unchanged, predominantly in the urine and to a lesser extent in the faeces. METHODS: The pharmacologic activity and potency of the two enantiomers of cetirizine in the management of allergic skin conditions were investigated by studying the effect of treatment with 5.0 mg cetirizine; 2.5 mg levocetirizine, the (R)-enantiomer; and 2.5 mg ucb 28557, the (S)-enantiomer, on histamine-induced wheal and flare response in 18 healthy volunteers. Each treatment was administered as a single oral dose in randomized, double-blind, and crossover manner, and the efficacy of treatment was assessed over a period of 32 h, as per cent inhibition of the histamine-induced wheal and flare areas before treatment. Blood and urine samples were collected in a time-dependent manner and analyzed for the total amounts of each study drug, to elucidate their pharmacokinetic profiles. RESULTS: Both cetirizine and levocetirizine caused a marked inhibition of histamine-induced wheal and flare, whereas ucb 28557 was inactive in this model. Inhibition of the wheal response observed for cetirizine and levocetirizine was apparent by 1 h after dosage and lasted for mean durations of 24.4 and 28.4 h, respectively. In addition, the response for cetirizine and levocetirizine became maximal by 6 h after treatment, rising to 79.5% and 83.8%. Similarly, cetirizine and levocetirizine also markedly inhibited the histamine-induced flare response. This effect was evident for both drugs by 1 h after dosage and lasted over a mean period of 28.4 and 26.0 h, respectively, for cetirizine and levocetirizine. The inhibitory effect of these compounds on histamine-induced flare response was also maximal by approximately 6 h after dosage, peaking at 88.5%) and 83.6%, respectively. Statistical evaluation showed that cetirizine and levocetirizine were equivalent for maximum inhibition of histamine-induced wheal and flare. However, levocetirizine was found to be superior to cetirizine when area under the curve was compared. In contrast, ucb 28557 was not found to inhibit histamine-induced wheal and flare responses at any time during the study period. Plasma concentrations of levocetirizine were found to be approximately double those of ucb 28557 at 4 and 8 h after dosing, and 50-60% of the drugs were excreted unchanged in urine over a period of 32 h. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that, in this model, levocetirizine 2.5 mg has comparable antihistaminic activity to cetirizine 5 mg, whereas its other enantiomer ucb 28557 has no pharmacodynamic effect, suggests that the antihistaminic properties of cetirizine observed in the management of allergic skin conditions are likely to be attributable to levocetirizine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Cetirizine, an H1-receptor antagonist, suppresses the expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor: its potential anti-inflammatory action.

BACKGROUND: H1-receptor antagonists are often effective in the treatment of allergic disorders such as atopic dermatitis. Cetirizine, a putative H1-receptor antagonist, has recently been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties through the inhibition of leucocyte recruitment and activation, and by the reduction of ICAM-1 expression on keratinocytes. OBJECTIVE: To further elucidate the anti-inflammatory properties of cetirizine, we first examined its effects on antigen-induced eosinophilia and neutrophila in vivo. We then examined the anti-inflammatory effects of cetirizine on a human keratinocyte A431cell line. METHODS: Mice were sensitized subcutaneously with ragweed pollen and were challenged intraperitoneally with the allergen. Cetirizine diluted in sterile water (0-20 mg/kg) or only sterile water was administered orally. Peritoneal cells were obtained at 8 and 24 h after challenge. The eosinophilia and neutrophilia induced by ragweed pollen extract were quantitated. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP-2) and eotaxin contents of peritoneal fluid were also measured by mouse ELISA. The effects of cetirizine on MIF-induced IL-8 production in A431 cells were examined by ELISA. The effects of cetirizine on MIF expression and production in A431 cells were examined by human MIF ELISA and Northern blot analysis. RESULTS: Eosinophilia and neutrophilia induced by ragweed pollen extract were found to be significantly reduced in cetirizine-treated mice (20 mg/kg). MIF, a pleuripotent cytokine, was significantly decreased at 8 and 24 h in the peritoneal fluid by cetirizine treatment. MIP-2 and eotaxin were also decreased 8 and 24 h, respectively, after challenge in the peritoneal fluid with cetirizine treatment. MIF stimulates IL-8 production in A431 cells. We found that MIF production in A431 cells was inhibited by 10 microm cetirizine. Consistent with this, cetirizine significantly inhibited MIF-induced IL-8 production. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that cetirizine exerts its anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting MIF as well as IL-8 production, such as those involved in inflammatory allergic skin disease, suggesting a broad spectrum of action beyond its mere H1-receptor-antagonistic function.

Allergens↗
PubMed1991

Cetirizine vs placebo in chronic idiopathic urticaria--a double blind randomised cross-over study.

The efficacy of cetirizine dihydrochloride, a new H1-antagonist claimed to have minimal sedative property was evaluated in 28 patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Cetirizine 10 mg and placebo were compared in a double-blind cross-over trial. Response was measured by patients with daily charts on itch and wheals. Response was also assessed by patients and investigators while on cetirizine and placebo on an analogue scale. The mean analogue score by the investigator while on cetirizine (64.6 mm) was better than while on placebo (47.0 mm) (p = 0.008). Reduction of itch with cetirizine was significantly greater than with placebo. The mean itch scores for placebo and cetirizine were 21.2 and 14.5 respectively (p = 0.01) showing a significant improvement of itch by cetirizine. The mean score for wheal response for placebo and cetirizine were 21.0 and 16.16 respectively (p = 0.07 NS) showing a reduction of wheal from cetirizine was greater than placebo but the difference was not statistically significant. The patients' mean visual analogue score for placebo was 38.4 and for cetirizine was 57.5 (p = 0.006). Cetirizine was significantly better in controlling symptoms of chronic urticaria than placebo. Five of the 28 (17.9%) patients reported mild drowsiness while taking cetirizine. Two patients reported drowsiness while on placebo. Tolerance was reported as good in 85%, moderate in 10% and bad in 5% according to patients' assessment, while tolerance was excellent and good in 80%, moderate in 15% of patients according to investigator's assessment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Cetirizine from topical phosphatidylcholine liposomes: evaluation of peripheral antihistaminic activity and systemic absorption in a rabbit model.

This study was performed to assess the peripheral H(1)-antihistaminic activity and extent of systemic absorption of cetirizine from liposomes applied to the skin. Cetirizine was incorporated into small unilamellar vesicles (SUV) and multilamellar vesicles (MLV) prepared using L-alpha-phosphatidylcholine, and into Glaxal Base (GB), used as the control. In a randomized, cross-over study, each formulation, containing 10 mg of cetirizine, was applied to depilated areas on the backs of six rabbits (3.08+/-0.05 kg). Histamine-induced wheal tests and blood sampling were performed before cetirizine application and at designated times for up to 24 h. Compared with the baseline, histamine-induced wheal formation was suppressed by cetirizine in SUV and MLV from 0.5-24 h and by cetirizine in GB from 0.5-8 h, p</=0.05. Maximum wheal suppression by cetirizine in SUV and MLV ranged from 90.6%+/-4.9% to 89.0%+/-3.8% and 98.0%+/-1.3% to 94.0%+/-2.3%, respectively, from 6 to 8 h. The plasma cetirizine AUC of 201+/-24.2 ng.h/ml from SUV was lower than from PC-MLV, 334.6+/-65.1 ng.h/ml and from GB, 248.3+/-34.6 ng.h/ml. After 24 h, the percent of the cetirizine dose remaining on the backs of the rabbits from SUV was lower than from both MLV and GB, p</=0.05. In this model, cetirizine from both SUV and MLV had excellent topical H(1)-antihistaminic effects, while systemic exposure to cetirizine from SUV was reduced.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1990

Effects of oral cetirizine, a selective H1 antagonist, on allergen- and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in subjects with asthma.

The protective efficacy of oral cetirizine, a selective and potent H1-receptor antagonist, against the immediate bronchoconstrictive response to allergen inhalation and exercise challenge was evaluated in 16 subjects with stable, predominantly mild asthma. The subjects underwent double-blind, crossover pretreatments in randomized order in two separate protocols with (1) three daily oral doses of 20 mg of cetirizine and placebo, followed by allergen inhalation, and (2) single oral doses of cetirizine (5, 10, and 20 mg), albuterol (4 mg), and placebo, followed by exercise with cold-air inhalation. Cetirizine failed to decrease bronchial sensitivity to inhaled allergen in eight of 10 subjects. Neither cetirizine nor albuterol uniformly inhibited exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Serum concentrations of cetirizine were consistent with systemic H1-blocking activity. Modest bronchodilation occurred after administration of cetirizine and albuterol before exercise but not after the third dose of cetirizine in the allergen protocol. One subject developed moderate drowsiness during multiple dosing with cetirizine. Thus, cetirizine, in the doses studied, is not uniformly effective in preventing allergen- or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Histamine is one of many mediators participating in immediate asthmatic responses, and selective H1 antagonists do not completely block these airway events. However, cetirizine may still clinically benefit some patients with asthma, such as patients with allergic rhinitis or urticaria.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Cetirizine and hydrocortisone differentially regulate ICAM-1 expression and chemokine release in cultured human keratinocytes.

BACKGROUND: Cetirizine is a H1 histamine antagonist which possesses anti-inflammatory properties through inhibition of leucocyte recruitment and activation, and reduction of ICAM-1 expression on mucosal epithelial cells. No studies have addressed the potential anti-inflammatory activities of cetirizine on skin keratinocytes. OBJECTIVES: Cetirizine and hydrocortisone were compared in their capacity to counteract human keratinocytes activation by IFNgamma. In particular, expression of immuno-modulatory membrane molecules and chemokine release have been examined. METHODS: Keratinocyte cultures established from normal skin of healthy donors were activated by IFNgamma (100-500 U/mL) in the absence or presence of cetirizine (10(-3)-10(3) microM) or hydrocortisone (10(-3)-10(2) microM), and tested for expression of ICAM-1, HLA-DR, MHC class I and CD40 as well as for release of RANTES, IL-8, macrophage chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). RESULTS: Cetirizine at high concentrations (10(2)-10(3) microM) markedly inhibited IFNgamma-induced expression of membrane ICAM-1, HLA-DR and up-regulation of MHC class I, but had no effect on CD40 expression. In contrast, hydrocortisone (10(2) microM) enhanced IFNgamma-induced membrane ICAM-1, reduced expression of HLA-DR and did not alter expression of MHC class I and CD40. Consistently, high doses of cetirizine decreased, whereas hydrocortisone increased, soluble ICAM-1 levels in the supernatants of IFNgamma-treated keratinocytes. The inhibiting and stimulating effects of cetirizine and hydrocortisone, respectively, on ICAM-1 expression were confirmed at the mRNA level by Northern blot analysis. Finally, cetirizine, but not hydrocortisone, inhibited the release of MCP-1 and RANTES from IFNgamma-stimulated keratinocytes. In contrast, hydrocortisone, but not cetirizine, reduced GM-CSF and IL-8 release. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that cetirizine has the capacity to block the IFNgamma-induced activation of keratinocytes, and thus can exert important regulatory effects on TH1 cell-mediated immune responses in the skin. The high doses required for evidencing these activities suggest the potential benefits of a topical use of cetirizine.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed2004

Cetirizine from topical phosphatidylcholine-hydrogenated liposomes: evaluation of peripheral antihistaminic activity and systemic absorption in a rabbit model.

Cetirizine, an effective, minimally sedating, second-generation H1-antihistamine is widely used orally to treat allergic skin disorders. This study was performed to assess the peripheral H1-antihistaminic activity and extent of systemic absorption of cetirizine from liposomes applied to the skin. Cetirizine was incorporated into small unilamellar vesicles (SUV) and multilamellar vesicles (MLV) prepared using L-alpha-phosphatidylcholine hydrogenated (HPC), and into Glaxal Base (GB) as the control. In a randomized, crossover study, each formulation, containing 10 mg of cetirizine, was applied to the depilated backs of 6 rabbits (3.08 +/- 0.05 kg). Histamine-induced wheal tests and blood sampling were performed before cetirizine application and at designated times for up to 24 hours afterwards. Compared with baseline, histamine-induced wheal formation was suppressed by cetirizine in SUV only at 24 hours, in MLV from 0.5 to 24 hours, and in GB from 0.5 to 8 hours (P < or = .05). Wheal suppression by cetirizine in SUV at 24 hours (91.7% +/- 5.2%) and in MLV from 1 to 24 hours (93.8% +/- 2.2% to 76.2% +/- 6.5%) was greater than in GB (36.5% +/- 7.4% to 60.6% +/- 14.2%) from 1 to 24 hours (P < or = .05). Faster onset, as well as greater and more persistent suppression was obtained from cetirizine in MLV. Plasma cetirizine concentrations from MLV (area under the curve [AUC] of 221.2 +/- 42.3 ng x hr/mL) were lower than from GB (AUC of 248.3 +/- 34.6 ng.hr/mL). In this model, cetirizine from MLV had excellent topical H(1)-antihistamine activity, while systemic exposure was reduced, compared with cetirizine from GB.

Absorption↗
PubMed2000

Enantioselective determination of cetirizine in human urine by HPLC.

In order to study the simultaneous determination of (+)- and (-)-cetirizine in human urine we have developed a chiral separation method by HPLC. A chiral stationary phase of alpha1-acidglycoprotein, the AGP-CSP, was used to separate the enantiomers. The pH of the phosphate buffer, as well as the content of the organic modifier in the mobile phase, markedly affected the chromatographic separation of (+)- and (-)-cetirizine. A mobile phase of 10 mmol/l phosphate buffer (pH 7.0)-acetonitrile (95: 5, v/v) was used for the urine assays. Ultraviolet absorption was monitored at 230 nm and roxatidine was employed as the internal standard for quantification. (+)-Cetirizine, (-)-cetirizine and the internal standard were eluted at retention times of 12, 16, and 32 mins, respectively. The detection limit for cetirizine enantiomers was 400 ng/ml of urine. A pharmacokinetic study was conducted with the help of 5 healthy female volunteers who were administered with a single oral dose of racemic cetirizine (20 mg). The peak area ratios provided by the cetirizine enantiomers were linear (r>0.997) over a concentration range of 2.5-200 microg/ml. The peak of the excreted cetirizine enantiomers appeared in the urine sample during the period of 1-2 hrs following the administration of the oral dose. The excreted level of (+)-cetirizine was slightly higher than (-)-cetirizine but the difference was not statistically significant. However, this method appears to have applications for enantioselective pharmacokinetic studies of racemic drugs.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Long-term treatment with cetirizine of infants with atopic dermatitis: a multi-country, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (the ETAC trial) over 18 months.

H1-receptor antagonists are considered central to the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD)-associated pruritus and are widely used in the treatment of AD despite a lack of double-blind, randomized clinical trials. In this study we analyzed the effects of the long-term use of cetirizine on the severity, natural history, and treatment of AD. In the prospective, multi-country, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Early Treatment of the Atopic Child (ETAC) study, 817 infants (12-24 months of age) who suffered from AD at study entry and with a history of atopic disease in a parent or sibling were treated for 18 months with either cetirizine (0.25 mg/kg) or placebo twice daily. All concomitant medications for the treatment of AD were allowed but had to be recorded by the investigator in the case report form; the concomitant use of H1-antihistamines was discouraged. The primary end-point for efficacy was the onset of asthma. Secondary parameters of efficacy, however, were the consumption of concomitant medications for AD (topical and systemic treatment) and the severity of symptoms related to AD, which was rated with the AD scale, SCORAD. The severity of AD, as measured by SCORAD, decreased significantly (p < 0.001) over the study period (18 months) in both groups. Other oral H1-antihistamines were significantly more often used in the placebo group than in the cetirizine group (24.9% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.03). The number of infants who developed urticaria during the study period was significantly lower with cetirizine treatment (placebo group: 16.2%; cetirizine group: 5.8%; p < 0.001). For the treatment of AD, mild topical corticosteroids (class I, e.g. hydrocortisone) were used in 41.6% of the patients (placebo group 41.6%, cetirizine group 41.7%) and moderate-to-potent topical corticosteroids (class II, III, IV) in 55.0% (respectively 56.4% and 53.5%). The duration of the use of topical moderate-to-potent corticosteroids differed between the cetirizine group and the placebo group (mean percentage of days: placebo 25.2, median 2.4; cetirizine mean 18.8, median 0.95 p = 0.067, Mann-Whitney test, not statistically significant). In sub-groups of infants with a SCORAD of >or= 25, this cortico-sparing effect was statistically significant (placebo 35.1 vs. 25.8 in the cetirizine group; p = 0.014, Mann-Whitney test). In conclusion, in view of the proven safety of cetirizine, the use of this drug might help to reduce the duration and the amount of moderate-to-strong topical corticosteroids used in the treatment of infants and children with AD. However, further studies designed with the primary end-point of AD are clearly indicated to confirm the benefits of the use of H1-antihistamines in the management of AD.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Review of cetirizine hydrochloride for the treatment of allergic disorders.

Cetirizine hydrochloride is an orally-active and selective histamine (H(1))-receptor antagonist. It is a second-generation antihistamine and a human metabolite of hydroxyzine. Therefore, its principal effects are mediated via selective inhibition of peripheral H(1) receptors. The antihistaminic activity of cetirizine has been documented in a variety of animal and human models. In vivo and ex vivo animal models have shown negligible anticholinergic and antiserotonergic activity. In clinical studies, however, dry mouth has been seen more commonly with cetirizine than with placebo. In vitro receptor binding studies have shown no measurable affinity for receptors other than H(1) receptors. Auto-radiographical studies with radiolabelled cetirizine in the rat have shown negligible penetration into the brain. Ex vivo experiments in the mouse have shown that systemically administered cetirizine does not significantly occupy cerebral H(1) receptors. Impairment of CNS function is comparable to other low-sedating antihistamines at the recommended dose of 10 mg/day for adults. It has anti-inflammatory properties that may play a role in asthma management. It does not interact with concomitantly administered medications, it has no cardiac adverse effects, and it does not appear to be associated with teratogenicity. Cetirizine is predominantly eliminated by the kidneys with a mean elimination half-life is 8.3 h. It is rapidly absorbed, and significant clinical inhibition of a wheal and flare response occurs in infants, children and adults within 20 min of a single oral dose and persists for 24 h. No tolerance to the wheal and flare response occurs even after 1 month of daily treatment. The clinical efficacy of cetirizine for allergic respiratory diseases has been established in numerous trials. There is evidence that cetirizine improves symptoms of urticaria. Concomitant use of cetirizine also decreases the duration and amount of topical anti-inflammatory preparations needed for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Interestingly, several clinical studies suggest that cetirizine may be useful in the treatment and prevention of mild asthma.

Anti-Allergic Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cetirizine decreases interleukin-4, interleukin-5, and interferon-gamma gene expressions in nasal-associated lymphoid tissue of sensitized mice.

Although the action of cetirizine dihydrochloride (cetirizine), a potent histamine H1 receptor antagonist, has been well known, its effect on the cytokine profiles in the nasal immune inductive site has not been elucidated yet. We studied the effect of cetirizine on the cytokine profiles in the nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT), which is a principal mucosal lymphoid tissue of the respiratory tract in rodents. Two different doses of cetirizine were given intraorally for 5 days before the nasal challenge of ovalbumin in sensitized mice. The sensitized group was given normal saline instead of cetirizine, and the nonsensitized group had no sensitization or medication. The cytokine gene expressions in the NALT taken from the mice were investigated with real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. The effect of cetirizine on the allergic symptom score, histamine threshold, and the eosinophil count in the nasal septal mucosa were examined also. Compared with the normal mice, the sensitized mice showed significantly increased levels of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5 gene expression although the increase of interferon (INF)-gamma gene expression was not significant. In the cetirizine groups, the levels of expression of IL-4, IL-5, and INF-gamma in the NALT were significantly decreased compared with the sensitized group. The cetirizine groups also showed decreased allergic symptom score, histamine threshold, and eosinophil count in the nasal septal mucosa compared with the sensitized group. In conclusion, cetirizine reduced the levels of expression of IL-4, IL-5, and INF-gamma in the NALT of ovalbumin-sensitized mice. Cetirizine also reduced the acute allergic symptom, histamine sensitivity, and eosinophil count in the nasal septal mucosa.

Airway Resistance↗