Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Census”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

New method to census primate groups: estimating group density of Japanese macaques by point census.

We devised a new method to estimate the density of primate groups in habitats that preclude the use of a line-transect census because the ground is too steep. We combined point census and group follows. From the number of groups counted at a fixed point for an hour, n, group density D was calculated: D = lambda n / pi. Lambda, the detectability constant, was a constant when distance-dependent detectability g(y) was regressed on a half-normal model: g(y) = e (-lambda y(2)) and can be estimated by combining the information of group follow and point census. Using this method, we estimated the group density of Japanese macaques in Yakushima. A census area of 7 km(2) was divided into 28 grid squares (500 m x 500 m). One observer was positioned at a point in each grid square, and those points were censused simultaneously for 4-6 days from 0600-0700 to 1500-1600 hr. Four troops were followed for 144 hr during the point census. Distance-dependent detectability closely correlated with the half-normal model. The detectability constant varied with the time of day, but it was not influenced by troop identity or topography. Group density was calculated to be 1.48 +/- 0.61 and 0.701 +/- 0.432 groups/km(2) in the disturbed and undisturbed areas, respectively (95% confidence limit). "True" group density estimated by home range data was within the confidence limit calculated by a point census in the home range of the troops for two troops, suggesting that this method was valid. This method is applicable to other species as long as at least one group can be followed, because it satisfies the fundamental assumptions of point census, and the detectability does not seem to be biased by troop or topography.

Animals↗

The Census Coverage Survey--the key element of a one number census.

The key measure of census quality is the level of response achieved. In recent censuses worldwide this level has been in the high nineties per cent. This was also true of censuses in Britain in 1991 (98 per cent). However, what was particularly noticeable about the census in Britain in 1991 was the differential response rate and the difficulty in effectively measuring this. The One Number Census programme was set up in the UK to research and develop a more effective methodology to measure and account for underenumeration in the 2001 Census. The key element in this process is the Census Coverage Survey--a significantly larger and redesigned post-enumeration survey. This article describes the planning and design of the survey with particular emphasis on the implementation of the proposed field methodology in practice. It also provides a high-level overview of the success of the survey.

Censuses↗

Evaluating census data quality using intensive reinterviews: a comparison of U.S. Census Bureau methods and Rasch methods.

"In this paper, we consider Rasch measurement methodology as an alternative to conventional U.S. Census Bureau methodology for evaluating the quality of data obtained using different measurements of the same characteristic. Rather than assuming, like the Census approach, that respondents have true states corresponding to the categories of a questionnaire item, the Rasch approach assumes that measuring instruments and survey respondents vary continuously on one or more common dimensions called latent traits. Unlike the Census approach, the Rasch approach requires that the properties of measuring instruments be invariant across different subclasses of respondents, generating parameter estimates that are sufficient statistics for elementary discrete sampling models. The different conclusions that can be drawn from the Census and Rasch approaches are illustrated by an evaluation of questionnaire items designed to measure the limitation or prevention of work because of physical or mental disability."

Americas↗

Choice and conflict about census data: adjusting the American census count.

In this paper "reasons for inevitable defects in the census count are listed in the first section; the second section reports efforts by the U.S. Census Bureau to identify sources of error in census coverage, and make estimates of the size of the errors.... The paper describes the conflict between statistical practices, laws and public policy about census adjustment in the United States, and concludes by considering the extent to which causes [of error] in America are likely to be found in other countries."

Americas↗

Sudan in the light of its national censuses, with special reference to the 1983 census.

"The aim of this paper is to examine Sudan's development conditions, using its national censuses as indicators of the status of the country, with special reference to the 1983 census, the last census in Sudan." The importance of taking migration into account when examining the prospects for development is stressed. The author also describes available demographic data sources for the Sudan, including the censuses of 1955-1956 and 1973. Sections are included on population size and growth, sex and age distribution, spatial distribution, population density, mortality, migration, illiteracy, and the labor force.

Africa↗

A controversial census topic: race and ethnicity in the British census.

"This paper examines attempts to collect data on a politically controversial topic, race and ethnicity, in the British Census of Population in the post-war period. It discusses an indirect, proxy method of inferring race or ethnicity by asking for the country of birth of the respondent and of his parents, and a direct question where the respondent is asked to identify his racial or ethnic group. Different versions of the direct question are examined, as is the 1979 Census test, which resulted in considerable public resistance to the question. Following the exclusion of the direct question from the 1981 Census, the subject was reviewed by the Parliamentary Home Affairs Committee, the results of whose report--including practical suggestions as to question wording--are discussed."

Censuses↗