Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cefoxitin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Inhibitory and bactericidal activity of selected beta-lactam agents alone and in combination with beta-lactamase inhibitors compared with that of cefoxitin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

The inhibitory activity of five beta-lactam agents, alone and in combination with a beta-lactamase inhibitor, was compared with that of cefoxitin and metronidazole against 300 beta-lactamase producing Bacteroides fragilis group isolates. Each of the beta-lactamase inhibitors significantly potentiated the activity of the respective beta-lactam. In the presence of clavulanate, the MIC90 (minimum inhibitory concentration) values of amoxicillin and ticarcillin were reduced 64-fold and 32-fold, respectively. Similarly, sulbactam enhanced the activity of ampicillin and cefoperazone 16-fold and 8-fold, respectively, whereas tazobactam potentiated the activity of piperacillin 16-fold. Few strains were resistant to the beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and were comprised of strains of B. fragilis, B. thetaiotamicron, and B. distasonis. Of the strains, 7% were resistant to cefoxitin, and none to metronidazole. Using time-kill kinetic studies, the bactericidal activity of the various beta-lactam agents, with and without beta-lactamase inhibitors, was determined and compared with that of cefoxitin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the B. fragilis group. Overall, metronidazole was the most bactericidal agent with all isolates being killed with less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml at 24 hr. Ampicillin-sulbactam was the next most bactericidal agent with all isolates being killed with less than or equal to 16/8 micrograms/ml of ampicillin-sulbactam at 24 hr. Amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefoperazone-sulbactam had bactericidal activity similar to that of ampicillin-sulbactam. Piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanate were bactericidal at higher concentrations with all isolates killed with 64 micrograms/ml of piperacillin and 128 micrograms/ml of ticarcillin combined with their respective beta-lactamase inhibitors. None of the beta-lactam agents alone was able to kill more than 19 of the 26 isolates. We conclude that beta-lactam agents combined with beta-lactamase inhibitors have both inhibitory and bactericidal activity against cefoxitin-resistant members of the B. fragilis group provided that the concentrations achieved for these combinations are at the upper limits for maximum recommended dosing. Although isolates of the B. fragilis group have been reported to produce unusual beta-lactamases that are refractory to beta-lactamase inhibitors, none of the cefoxitin-resistant isolates tested in this study were resistant to the beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1983

Amdinocillin plus cefoxitin versus cefoxitin alone in therapy of mixed soft tissue infections (including diabetic foot infections).

In a randomized comparative trial, 45 patients were treated with amdinocillin plus cefoxitin or cefoxitin alone for bacterial soft tissue infections. Most patients were diabetic and had polymicrobial foot infections. The combination of amdinocillin plus cefoxitin was active in vitro against 71 percent of the isolates obtained before therapy as compared with 65 percent for cefoxitin alone. The combination demonstrated synergy for 29 percent of the isolates tested. A satisfactory clinical response occurred in 90 percent and 71 percent of patients treated with the combination regimen and cefoxitin, respectively, (p greater than 0.1). An increase in serum creatinine thought to be due to interstitial nephritis occurred in one patient treated with the combination regimen. The combination of amdinocillin and cefoxitin was effective in mixed soft tissue infections including diabetic foot infections.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of the bactericidal activity of clindamycin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Time-kill kinetic methodology was used to evaluate the bactericidal activity of cefoxitin, cefotetan, clindamycin, and metronidizole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group. Overall, metronidazole was the most bactericidal agent, with all isolates being killed with less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml at 24 hr. Clindamycin was the next most bactericidal agent, with 20 of 26 isolates being killed with less than 16 micrograms/ml. Six isolates with clindamycin MICs greater than or equal to 64 micrograms/ml were not killed at 24 hr, with concentrations as high as 256 micrograms/ml. Cefoxitin and cefotetan were the least bactericidal agents tested. Seven isolates with MICs of greater than or equal to 64 micrograms/ml to each agent demonstrated a lack of killing at 24 hr, with concentrations of the respective agent as high as 256 micrograms/ml. At concentrations with either agent of 32 micrograms/ml, the remaining 19 isolates were killed at 24 hr. Of the six B. fragilis isolates resistant to clindamycin, four were also resistant to both cefoxitin and cefotetan. We conclude that in hospitals with cefoxitin-resistant B. fragilis group isolates, metronidazole would provide appropriate therapy.

Bacteroides↗
PubMed1984

Comparison of intravenous cefoxitin prophylaxis with intraoperative cefoxitin irrigation for the prevention of post-cesarean-section endometritis.

The effectiveness of intraoperative irrigation with cefoxitin was compared prospectively with that of a short course of intravenous cefoxitin as prophylaxis against endometritis. One hundred three patients who underwent primary cesarean at University Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida, were randomized into two study groups. The first group received intraoperative cefoxitin irrigation. The second group received a short course of intravenous cefoxitin prophylaxis and intraoperative saline irrigation. The resulting incidence of endometritis was 3.8% and 4%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the use of the cefoxitin solution and the short course of intravenous cefoxitin.

Cefoxitin↗
PubMed1995

Single-dose cefotetan or cefoxitin versus multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in patients undergoing appendectomy for acute nonperforated appendicitis.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective, double-blind study was performed to examine the effects of prophylactic cefotetan and cefoxitin in postoperative wound infection for patients with nonperforated acute appendicitis. METHODS: One hundred thirty-six of 179 patients with a clinical diagnosis of appendicitis were evaluated and divided into three groups: group 1 received 2 g cefotetan preoperatively, group 2 received 2 g cefoxitin preoperatively, and group 3 received 2 g cefoxitin preoperatively followed by three postoperative doses. RESULTS: The overall wound infection rate was 4.6 percent. Group 2 (single-dose cefoxitin) had a significantly higher wound infection rate (11.1 percent) than group 1 (single-dose cefotetan) (zero percent) or group 3 (multiple-dose cefoxitin) (1.9 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose cefotetan and multiple-dose cefoxitin are equally effective. However, because of the greater convenience and markedly decreased cost, single-dose cefotetan is the prophylaxis of choice in appendectomy for nonperforated appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1993

Cross-resistance to beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and clindamycin among cefoxitin-resistant and cefoxitin-susceptible strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

In the present study the cross-resistance rates of cefoxitin-resistant and cefoxitin-susceptible strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group were compared with regard to beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and clindamycin. Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most active agent tested with an overall resistance rate of 0.2% and no resistance among cefoxitin-resistant strains. Ticarcillin-clavulanate was the least active combination with an overall resistance rate of 1.6% but a resistance rate of 13.1% among cefoxitin-resistant strains. For ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and clindamycin resistance, rates of cefoxitin-resistant versus cefoxitin-susceptible strains were 9.1% and 0.4%, 8.3% and 0.9%, and 28% and 12.9%, respectively.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1983

A comparative study of netilmicin-cefoxitin and gentamicin-cefoxitin in surgical patients with serious systemic infection.

A double-blind, randomized study of gentamicin and netilmicin, each in combination with cefoxitin, was done to compare their respective efficacy and toxicity in patients with serious systemic infection. Thirty-seven surgical patients were evaluated for efficacy and 46 patients were evaluated for toxicity. The most frequently cultured organisms were Escherichia coli (15), Klebsiella sp (9), Proteus sp (6), and Bacteroides sp (4). For 23 patients treated with gentamicin-cefoxitin (G-C), the clinical response was favorable in 20/21 (95.2%) evaluable cases, and elimination or marked reduction of 33/34 (97.1%) organisms was achieved. For 14 patients treated with netilmicin-cefoxitin (N-C), the clinical response was favorable in 13/13 (100%) evaluable cases, and 19/20 (95%) organisms were eliminated or markedly reduced. Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine to greater than 25% over baseline with an absolute rise of at least 0.5 mg/100 ml to a value greater than or equal to 1.3 mg/100 ml. Based on these criteria, nephrotoxicity was seen in 2/27 (7.4%) patients treated with G-C and in 3/19 (15.8%) patients treated with N-C. Ototoxicity was defined as a greater than 20 dB loss at any frequency. Based on these criteria, ototoxicity was seen in 5/27 (18.5%) patients treated with G-C and 2/19 (10.5%) patients treated with N-C. The data show no significant difference in toxicity and suggest that netilmicin and gentamicin are both highly effective in combination with cefoxitin in patients who have serious infections after surgery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Evaluation of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth for recovery of Clostridium difficile from environmental sites.

Cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth (CCFB) containing either 500 or 250 micrograms of cycloserine per ml were compared for efficacy in the isolation of Clostridium difficile from hospital ward environmental sites. A RODAC imprint technique was used to inoculate prereduced CCFA. Moistened swabs were used to inoculate prereduced CCFB from environmental sites immediately adjacent to the RODAC sample sites. CCFA (6% positive) was significantly more sensitive than CCFB (3% positive; P less than 0.005), regardless of the cycloserine concentration. When the CCFA cycloserine concentration was decreased from 500 to 250 micrograms/ml, the overall rate of positive cultures rose from 4 to 17%. Medium containing 500 micrograms of cycloserine per ml may be too inhibitory to isolate many moderately sensitive strains of C. difficile from environmental sites. Regardless of the cycloserine concentration, the CCFA RODAC imprint technique is superior to the CCFB method.

Agar↗
PubMed1978

Enzymatic studies on the mechanism of action of cefoxitin. Correlation between the affinities of cefoxitin to penicillin-binding proteins and its rates of inhibition of the respective penicillin-sensitive reactions in E. coli.

The affinities of cefoxitin, a cephamycin antibiotic, to penicillin-binding proteins of Escherichia coli were reexamined using a recently developed method for separating penicillin-binding proteins. The inhibitions by this antibiotic of four measurable penicillin-sensitive enzymatic reactions, the reactions of D-alanine carboxypeptidases IA and IB, cross-bridge formation and concomitant release of D-alanine, were also measured. An approximate correlation was found between the affinities of cefoxitin to the penicillin-binding proteins responsible for these reactions and its rates of inhibition of the respective penicillin-sensitive reactions.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2003

Liposomal entrapment of cefoxitin to improve cellular viability and function in human saphenous veins.

Liposomal cefoxitin was prepared and applied to the pretreatment of human saphenous vein (HSV) for implantation. The possible use of liposomal cefoxitin to improve cellular viability and function and to maintain its potential sterilization effect was investigated. Entrapment efficiency and size distribution of liposomal cefoxitin were 75.7% and 652 +/- 75.7 nm, respectively. The weight ratio between cefoxitin and liposome was calculated at 1 : 40.6. When cefoxitin was entrapped with liposome, the released amount of cefoxitin was not affected by temperature conditions (37 degrees C, 25 degrees C, and 4 degrees C). The amount of free cefoxitin present in HSV reached 59% at 0.5 h and gradually decreased with time, while liposomal cefoxitin showed a maximum amount (63%) at 1.5 h, indicating that liposomal cefoxitin seemed to control the initial amount of cefoxitin present in HSV. Liposomal cefoxitin showed better viabilities of whole cells and endothelial cells dissociated from HSV than free cefoxitin and remarkably superior function of endothelial cells, as determined by Griffonia simplicifolia agglutinins-fluorescein isothiocyanate/propidium iodide double-staining methods combined with flow cytometry and endothelial nitric oxide synthase assay, respectively. In terms of sterilization effect, there was no significant difference between liposomal cefoxitin and free cefoxitin. These results suggest that liposomal entrapment of cefoxitin could improve cellular viability and functions and maintain the original sterilization effect.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1981

[Clinical findings of cefoxitin in the treatment of serious infections and the prevention of postoperative infections (author's transl)].

UNLABELLED: This clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and patient tolerance of cefoxitin in 23 patients who were admitted to the hospital from March 1980 to November 1980. The daily dose of cefoxitin for 21 adult patients (ages ranged from 26 to 74 years old) were 6 g for the treatment of infections, and 2 to 6 g for the prevention of infections by either direct or intermittent intravenous infusions. Two children were given 100 mg/kg of cefoxitin either by direct or intermittent intravenous infusions 2 to 3 times a day in divided doses. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: I. Treatment of intracranial infections 1. A 60-year-old man with a brain abscess was admitted to the hospital after the unsuccessful treatment with a cephalothin for 9 days. After, the initiation of therapy with cefoxitin, given 6 g a day for 3 days, the abscess was surgically removed. On the second day of treatment with cefoxitin following the operation, his highest temperature was 37.0 degrees C and was normal on the third day of treatment. He was discharged after 12 days after the surgical procedure. 2. A 56-year-old woman with cerebrospinal rhinorrhea and meningitis after the transsphenoidal removal of pituitary microadenoma responded satisfactorily to therapy with cefoxitin, given 6 g a day for 14 days after the unsuccessful treatment with a cephalothin. II. The prevention of infections following surgical operation of the central nervous system 1. Seventeen patients undergoing surgical procedures were treated with cefoxitin for the prevention of postoperative infections. None of the 17 patients developed postoperative infections. 2. A 53-year-old man undergoing repair of cerebrospinal rhinorrhea in the possibly contaminated area was successfully treated with cefoxitin, given intravenous 2 g every 8 hours for 10 days without meningitis having developed. III. The treatment and prevention of complications 1. A 74-year-old comatose male with a brain stem concussion, who was expectorating insufficiently and had difficulty swallowing and developed into pneumonia as a complication. He was successfully treated with cefoxitin, given intravenous 6 g a day for 2 weeks. 2. A 26-year-old male with a brain stem concussion complicated by pneumonia and a urinary tract infection was successfully treated with the same dose regimen of cefoxitin as the previous patient. 3. The prevention of complications A 58-year-old male with pontine glioma undergoing a tracheotomy was administered cefoxitin for the prevention of pulmonary complication. He died of pontine glioma after the three-month treatment. IV. Side effects Results of skin sensitivity tests given prior to the administration of cefoxitin were negative in all of the 23 patients. Neither anaphylaxis nor other allergic reactions or thrombophlebitis occurred with the intravenous administration of cefoxitin. No abnormalities in blood, hepatic function or renal function were observed. Anorexia occurred in 1 patient who was given cefoxitin, 6 g a day.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Antimicrobial evaluation of cefoxitin: a new semisynthetic cephamycin. Comparative studies with cefazolin and cefalotin.

Antimicrobial activity of 3-carbamoyloxymethyl-7-alpha-methoxy-7-[2-(2-thienyl)-acetamido]-3-cephem-4-carboxylic acid (cefoxitin), a new semisynthetic cephamycin antibiotic, was studied in comparison with that of cefazolin and cefalotin. Cefoxitin exhibited antibacterial activity against both gramnegative and gram-positive bacteria, and its action was bactericidal. Against gram-negative bacteria, cefoxitin was highly active as well as cefazolin, and more active than cefalotin. Especially, cefoxitin was highly active not only against strains of clinical isolates of indole-positive Proteus and S. marcescens but also against those of E. coli and P. mirabilis which were resistant to cefazolin and/or cefalotin, respectively. In addition, cefoxitin was effective against the strains resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics including cefazolin and cefalotin. Cefoxitin was hardly active against the strains of E. cloacae and P. aeruginosa, similar to cefazolin and cefalotin. Against gram-postive bacteria, cefoxitin was less active than cefazolin and cefalotin. In protection tests in mice, cefoxitin and cefazolin were more effective against infection with E. coli than cefalotin. Furthermore, cefoxitin was more active against infections with S. marcescens and P. morgani than the other antibiotics. Cefoxitin, like cefalotin, was less effective against infection with S. aureus than cefazolin. Cefoxitin was highly resistant to hydrolysis by beta-lactamases derived from the organisms insusceptible to the antibiotic. This fact revealed that the resistance of the organisms to cefoxitin may be in part due to factors other than beta-lactamase inactivation.

Animals↗
PubMed1981

[Laboratory and clinical evaluation of cefoxitin in children (author's transl)].

Pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin, a new injectable semisynthetic-cephamycin, was studied in 12 healthy children and also was studied cerebrospinal fluid levels in 1 patient with bacterial meningitis received 44.5 mg/kg of cefoxitin and thoracic fluid levels in 2 patients were measured. Cefoxitin was administered intravenously to 50 patients with various types of infections an average dose of 130 mg/kg/day for an average of 9 days. The results were as follows: 1. Favorable plasma levels were obtained comparing with those off conventional injectable cephalosporins after 15 mg/kg and 25 mg/kg of cefoxitin for one shot intravenous injection. The half lives of cefoxitin in the plasma were about 15.9 minutes up to 1 hour and 25.5 minutes up to 2 hours after an intravenous administration of cefoxitin at a dose of 15 mg/kg, and while, those were 15.9 minutes and 27.5 minutes after an intravenous administration of cefoxitin at a dose of 25 mg/kg, respectively. 2. Cefoxitin was excreted with high concentration up to 2 hours after the administration and thereafter, urinary concentration of cefoxitin declined rapidly with the lapse of time. The time course urinary concentration reflected those of plasma levels. Approximately 94.7% and 90.6% of dosed cefoxitin were recovered in the urine for 6 hours after the administration at the dose of 15 mg/kg and 25 mg/kg, respectively. 3. The cerebrospinal fluid levels of cefoxitin were only determined in a patient of bacterial meningitis. Therefore, further study should be performed. 4. The thoracic fluid levels with 2 patients were higher than cerebrospinal fluid levels. 5. Among the 50 patients with various infections, cefoxitin was clinically effective in 84% and bacterial response in 87%. 6. As adverse reactions, in total 79 patients included exclusive 29 patients, diarrhea occurred in 1 patient, sweating and cough in 1 patient, rash with fever in 4 patients, vascular pain in 2 patients, and leukopenia was observed in 1 patient, eosinophilia in 1 patient, and increase of GOT and LDH were observed in each 2 patients. The other adverse reactions were not experienced.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1980

Effect of orally administered probenecid on the pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin.

To characterize the effect of orally administered probenecid on the pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin in healthy male volunteers, we administered to one group of six subjects 2 g of cefoxitin by intravenous (i.v.) bolus either alone, with 1 g of probenecid concomitantly, or when 1 g of probenecid was administered 1 h previously by using a crossover design. Likewise, we administered to a second group of six subjects 2 g of cefoxitin intramuscularly (i.m.) together with 1 and 2 g of probenecid. Probenecid increased the mean terminal half-life and the area under the serum cefoxitin concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) and decreased renal clearance, but did not alter the volume of the central compartment or the total urinary recovery of i.v.-administered cefoxitin; pretreatment with probenecid produced a greater increase in cefoxitin AUC0-24 and a constant decrease in renal clearance compared to concomitant probenecid. The AUC0-24 after i.m.-administered cefoxitin was greater after 2 g than 1 g of probenecid; the AUC0-24 after i.v.-and i.m.-administered cefoxitin was similar after 1 g of probenecid was given concomitantly. Cefoxitin AUC0-24 was increased further when 1 g of probenecid was given before i.v.-administered cefoxitin or when 2 g of probenecid was given with i.m.-administered cefoxitin. The effect of probenecid was related to both timing and dose.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1993

Comparison of cefoxitin and ceftizoxime in a hospital therapeutic interchange program.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether (a) ceftizoxime can replace cefoxitin in the prevention and treatment of various infections in a major teaching hospital, (b) a previously applied two-stage intervention program is an effective method of instituting a therapeutic interchange of ceftizoxime for cefoxitin and (c) the replacement of cefoxitin with ceftizoxime results in a more cost-effective therapy. DESIGN: Two-phase, open, sequential study. SETTING: Tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred patients who received cefoxitin during the 6 months immediately before the start of the interchange program (phase 1) and 100 who received ceftizoxime during the 6 months immediately after the start of the program (phase 2) were randomly selected. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of the two patient groups were similar except for sex (p < 0.05). The cefoxitin doses were usually given every 6 hours (in 33% of the cases) or every 8 hours (in 61%), whereas the ceftizoxime doses were usually given every 12 hours (in 98%). Prescriber distribution was stable throughout the study period, the Department of General Surgery being responsible for about 70% of the orders. Prophylactic indications accounted for over 60% of the treatment courses. The proportion of prophylactic treatment courses that resulted in a successful clinical outcome did not differ between the two groups (cefoxitin 92% and ceftizoxime 91%). Of the empiric or directed treatment courses clinical success or improvement was observed in 89% of the cefoxitin and 91% of the ceftizoxime recipients. Microbiologic eradication was seen in 65% of the cefoxitin and 90% of the ceftizoxime directed treatment courses. Pathogens isolated during therapy were similar in the two treatment groups. Diarrhea was the most common adverse effect, occurring in 8% of the cefoxitin and 10% of the ceftizoxime recipients; no Clostridium difficile or C.-difficile-producing toxin was identified in these patients. The ceftizoxime therapy was 36% less expensive than the cefoxitin therapy on average, and the annual savings was estimated to be $83,123. An estimated 5615 drug doses were avoided annually, for an additional savings of $24,875 in drug administration. Therefore, the total estimated annual cost savings resulting from this two-stage interchange program was $107,998. Given the cost of $4856 to implement and maintain the program, the estimated net savings for the first year was $103,142. CONCLUSION: Ceftizoxime can replace cefoxitin in the prevention and treatment of various infections. The form of evaluation described herein is valuable when any formulary modification is being considered in a hospital.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The characterization and biodistribution of cefoxitin-loaded liposomes.

To conquer the clinical restriction of relative short half-life and poor tissue retaining activities, liposomes containing cefoxitin were prepared using three methods in this study. The physicochemical properties including cefoxitin encapsulation percentage, vesicle size, stability, as well as the in vivo biodistribution were studied. The highest entrapment percentage was observed by using reverse phase evaporation method, and the molar ratio of cefoxitin to phospholipids was 1:3, DMPC to cholesterol was 2:1, respectively. From the result of stability, the freeze-drying powder and then stored in the frozen condition of cefoxitin-loaded liposome was an ideal storage state. Accordingly, the formulation by reverse-phase evaporation method was selected to investigate the biodistribution of cefoxitin-loaded liposome and compared to free cefoxitin in rats. It was observed that the cefoxitin levels and the duration retained in the liver, spleen, and pancreas of liposome-injected animals were higher and longer than that of free cefoxitin-injected animals. The drug concentrations of bile after post-injection of liposomal cefoxitin at 0.5, 1 and 2 h were all approximately 2.7 times higher than that of free cefoxitin injection group.

Animals↗