Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Active compression-decompression. A new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Working Group.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in humans a new form of CPR that involves both active compression and active decompression of the chest. DESIGN: Patients in cardiac arrest in whom standard advanced cardiac life support failed were randomized to receive 2 minutes of either standard or active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR using a custom, hand-held suction device, followed by 2 minutes of the alternate technique. The ACD device was applied midsternum and used to perform CPR according to the guidelines of the American Heart Association: 80 compressions per minute, compression depth of 3.8 to 5 cm, 50% duty cycle, and constant-volume ventilation. Mechanical Thumper CPR was also compared in five patients. End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) concentrations and hemodynamic variables were measured. Transesophageal Doppler echocardiography was used to assess contractility, the velocity time integral (an analogue of cardiac output), and diastolic myocardial filling times. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled. The mean +/- SD ETCO2 was 4.3 +/- 3.8 mm Hg with standard CPR and 9.0 +/- 3.9 mm Hg with ACD CPR (P less than .0001). Systolic arterial pressure with standard CPR was 52.5 +/- 14.0 mm Hg and with ACD CPR, 88.9 +/- 24.7 mm Hg (P less than .003). The velocity time integral increased from 7.3 +/- 2.6 cm with standard CPR to 17.5 +/- 5.6 cm with ACD CPR (P less than .0001), and diastolic filling times increased from 0.23 +/- .09 seconds with standard CPR to 0.37 +/- .12 seconds with ACD CPR (P less than .004). Mechanical Thumper CPR consistently underperformed both standard and ACD CPR. Minute ventilation obtained in four patients during ACD CPR without endotracheal ventilation was 6.6 +/- 0.9 L/min. After 1 hour of standard CPR failed, three of 10 patients randomized to ACD CPR rapidly converted to a hemodynamically stable rhythm following 2 minutes of ACD CPR. CONCLUSION: ACD CPR is a simple manual technique that improved cardiopulmonary circulation in 10 patients during cardiac arrest. Although ACD CPR may have produced a return of spontaneous circulation in three patients refractory to standard measures, its impact on survival when used early in cardiac arrest remains to be determined.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A comparison of standard and a modified method of two resuscitator adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation: description of a new system for research into advanced life support skills.

The study compares two methods of Advanced Life Support by a pair of resuscitators using a bag-valve-mask (BVM) technique. Standard two resuscitator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was compared with a modified method of two resuscitator CPR. During the modified CPR one resuscitator held the face mask while the other resuscitator alternates between squeezing the self inflating bag and performing simulated cardiac compressions. Standard CPR was performed at a ventilation:compression ratio of 1:5 while modified CPR was performed at a ventilation:compression ratio of 2:15. Comparisons were made during induction of anaesthesia in 30 ASA I and II patients. Modified CPR produced a greater tidal volume (TV) (P < 0.001), a slower respiratory rate (RR) (P < 0.001) and a faster compression rate (CR) (P < 0.01) (means with (S.D.): modified CPR: TV 990 (220) ml, RR 6 (1) min(-1), CR 82 (8) min(-1); standard CPR: TV 570 (190) ml, RR 10 (2) min(-1), CR 65 (11) min(-1)). A new method for the simultaneous computerised recording of simulated cardiac compressions together with mask pressure and expired gas composition in anaesthetised patients is described.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

[Cardiopulmonary resuscitation].

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation has been used for over 25 years. Recent developments related to a better understanding of the physiology of external massage and to the effect of drugs such as calcium and bicarbonate during cardiac arrest have improved the results of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗
PubMed1997

Splenic rupture following cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation has improved outcome from cardiac arrest. However complications may occur secondary to the resuscitation efforts. We present a case of intraabdominal haemorrhage, due to traumatic rupture of the spleen and discuss the problems of diagnosing intraabdominal haemorrhage in the post cardiac arrest patient, whose hypotension may be ascribed to myocardial dysfunction.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a technique used in both human and veterinary medicine. Although a number of innovative adaptations to CPR have been researched, the mainstay of CPR remains intubation, adequate ventilation, chest compressions, and basic drug therapy. The purpose of this article is to review the techniques and drugs commonly used in both closed chest and open chest CPR.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Thrombolytic therapy in patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is often considered a contraindication to thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Of 708 patients involved in the first 3 Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trials of lytic therapy for acute infarction, 59 patients required less than 10 minutes of CPR before receiving lytic therapy (CPR greater than 10 minutes was an exclusion of the trials) or required CPR within 6 hours of treatment. The patients receiving CPR were similar to the remainder of the group with respect to baseline demographics. The indication for CPR was usually ventricular fibrillation (73%) or ventricular tachycardia (24%). The median duration of CPR was 1 minute, with twenty-fifth and seventy-fifth percentiles of 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. The median number of cardioversions/defibrillations performed was 2 (twenty-fifth and seventy-fifth percentiles of 1 and 3 minutes, respectively). Patients receiving CPR were more likely to have anterior infarctions (66 vs 39%), the left anterior descending artery as the infarct-related artery (63 vs 38%) and lower ejection fractions on the initial ventriculogram (46 +/- 11 vs 52 +/- 12%) than those not receiving CPR. In-hospital mortality was 12 vs 6% with most deaths due to pump failure (57%) or arrhythmia (29%) in the CPR group and pump failure (38%) or reinfarction (25%) in the non-CPR group. At 7 day follow-up the CPR group had a significant increase in ejection fraction (+5 +/- 9%) compared with no change in non-CPR group. There were no bleeding complications directly attributed to CPR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Selected controversies in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed frequently by paramedics, emergency department personnel, and inpatient physicians. Unfortunately, after more than 40 years of practice and study, there are still many controversies and unresolved treatment issues. This article focuses on four current controversies in CPR: (1) the role of end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) detection, (2) the use of bicarbonate, (3) whether epinephrine is the optimal alpha agonist, and (4) whether amiodarone should replace lidocaine as the initial antiarrhythmic of choice in the treatment of ventricular fibrillation.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

Alternative Mechanical Methods of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has become the standard of care for providing circulatory support to victims of cardiac arrest. However, despite its widespread acceptance, few victims ever survive to hospital admission and even fewer to hospital discharge. In hopes of improving survival rates of those suffering cardiac arrest, investigators have suggested and tested several modifications to standard CPR to optimize its hemodynamic effects. In this review, we discuss the important chest compression techniques that have been used over the past 3.5 decades which have mirrored our evolving understanding of the mechanisms underlying CPR.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1991

Potential for injury: trauma after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a technique that saves lives and is a measure that critical care practitioners use without hesitation. Potential complications from CPR, however, include injury. The reported incidence of such injuries ranges from 21% to more than 65%. Unfortunately, even properly executed CPR can lead to injury. The incidence of most common injuries, such as injury to the skin, bony thorax, and upper airway, may be limited by performance of proper basic and advanced life support. Limiting these injuries is important. Discovering them in successfully resuscitated victims, however, is critical to long-term recovery and rehabilitation. As future techniques for CPR evolve, further research needs to focus on those techniques that limit the potential for injury.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1993

A comparison of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrests occurring in the hospital.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated improved cardiopulmonary circulation during cardiac arrest with the use of a hand-held suction device (Ambu CardioPump) to perform active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The purpose of this study was to compare active compression-decompression with standard CPR during cardiac arrests in hospitalized patients. METHODS: All patients over the age of 18 years who had a witnessed cardiac arrest while hospitalized at our center were enrolled in this trial; they were randomly assigned according to their medical-record numbers to receive either active compression-decompression or standard CPR. The study end points were the rates of initial resuscitation, survival at 24 hours, hospital discharge, and neurologic outcome. Compressions were performed according to the recommendations of the American Heart Association (80 to 100 compressions per minute; depth of compression, 3.8 to 5.1 cm [1.5 to 2 in.]; and 50 percent of the cycle spent in compression). RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (45 men and 17 women) with a mean age (+/- SE) of 68 +/- 2 years were entered into the trial. Sixty-two percent of the patients who underwent active compression-decompression were initially resuscitated, as compared with 30 percent of the patients who received standard CPR (P < 0.03); 45 percent of the patients who underwent active compression-decompression survived for at least 24 hours, as compared with 9 percent of patients who underwent standard CPR (P < 0.004). Two of the 62 study patients survived to hospital discharge; both were randomly assigned to receive active compression-decompression. Neurologic outcome, as measured by the Glasgow coma score, was better with active compression-decompression (8.0 +/- 1.3) than with standard CPR (3.5 +/- 0.3; P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, we found that, as compared with standard CPR, active compression-decompression CPR improved the rate of initial resuscitation, survival at 24 hours, and neurologic outcome after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Larger trials will be required to assess the potential benefit in terms of long-term survival.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[New recommendations in European cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines (Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2000: an International Consensus on Science].

The article presents most important changes in international guidelines for adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In this article guideline changes in basic and advanced life support published in Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care--a Consensus on Science are discussed. Major changes in guidelines presented in this article include: pulse check, ventilation technique for rescue breathing, compression technique, abdominal thrust recommendations, precordial thump, universal algorithm changes.

Cardiology↗
PubMed2001

Simultaneous sternothoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

No existing device for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is designed to exploit both the "cardiac pump" and the "thoracic pump" effect simultaneously. The purpose of this study was to measure the haemodynamic effect of a new simultaneous sternothoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (SST-CPR) device that could compress the sternum and constrict the thoracic cavity simultaneously in a canine cardiac arrest model. After 4 min of ventricular fibrillation, 24 mongrel dogs were randomized to receive standard CPR (n=12) or SST-CPR (n=12). SST-CPR generated a new pattern of the aortic pressure curve presumed to be the result of both sternal compression and thoracic constriction. SST-CPR resulted in significantly higher mean arterial pressure than standard CPR (68.9+/-16.1 vs. 30.5+/-10.0 mmHg, P<0.01). SST-CPR generated higher coronary perfusion pressure than standard CPR (47.0+/-11.4 vs. 17.3+/-8.9 mmHg, P<0.01). End tidal CO(2) tension was also higher during SST-CPR than standard CPR (11.6+/-6.1 vs. 2.17+/-3.3 mmHg, P<0.01). In this preliminary animal model study, simultaneous sternothoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation generated better haemodynamic effects than standard, closed chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

A comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with cardiopulmonary bypass after prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs. Reperfusion pressures and neurologic recovery.

Resuscitability and outcome after prolonged cardiac arrest were compared in dogs with standard external cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) vs. closed-chest emergency cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was with no blood flow from VF 0 min to VF 10 min. Subsequent CPR basic life support (BLS) was from 10 min to VF 15 min. Then, group I (n = 13) received CPR advanced life support (ALS) from VF 15 min until restoration of spontaneous circulation to occur not later than VF 40 min. Group II (n = 14) received CPR-ALS from VF 15 min to VF 20 min without defibrillation, and then total CPB to defibrillation attempts started at VF 20 min, followed by assisted CPB to 2 h. Total ischemia time (no-flow time plus CPR time of MAP less than 50 mmHg) was unexpectedly shorter in group I (14.3 +/- 2.5 min) than in group II (18.6 +/- 2.3 min) (P less than 0.01). During CPR-BLS, coronary perfusion pressures were 25 +/- 9 mmHg in group I and 18 +/- 8 mmHg in group II (NS). Epinephrine during CPR-ALS, before countershock, raised coronary perfusion pressure to 40 +/- 10 mmHg in group I and 27 +/- 10 mmHg in group II (NS). In group II, coronary perfusion pressure increased during total CPB to 58 +/- 16 mmHg (P less than 0.01 vs. group I). Spontaneous normotension was restored in 11/13 dogs of group I and all 14 dogs of group II (NS). Ten dogs in each group followed protocol and survived to 96 h. Five of ten in group I and six of ten in group II were neurologically normal (NS). We conclude that: (1) Reperfusion with CPB yields higher coronary perfusion pressures than reperfusion with CPR-ALS; and (2) even after no blood flow for 10 min, optimized CPR can result in cardiovascular resuscitability and neurologic recovery, similar to those achieved by CPB.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: discrepancy between the actual cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the documentation in the medical record]

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of the patients not resuscitated in a university affiliated pediatric hospital. To characterize the data registered in the chart regarding the resuscitation and evaluate ethical and legal aspects of CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). METHODS: Retrospective study of 176 deaths that occurred in a one year time period. The chart was reviewed and compared to information received directly from the physician that participated in the patientacute;s resuscitation. Ethical and legal aspects involved in resuscitation efforts were discussed. RESULTS: During the study period 176 deaths occurred. 47 (26.7%) patients did not receive CPR as reported directly by the physician in charge of the patient when the dead occurred. Two patients were excluded, because the chart could not be found. Prior to their death, 64.4% (29/45) received mechanical ventilatory support and 48.5% (33/45) received inotropic support. 60% (27/45) of the deaths occurred in the intensive care unit. The most common diagnoses at admission were sepsis in 28% (13/45) and pneumonia with respiratory failure in 27% (12/45). The most common underlying medical conditions were malignancies in 28.8% (13/45). Of these 45 patients, the medical record about CPR was available in 40 charts. It was documented that 11/40 (27.5%) were declared dead without resuscitation efforts and in 29/40 (72.5%) the medical record stated that CPR was performed without improvement in vital signs. CONCLUSION: There was a discrepancy between the actual cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts and the documentation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the medical record. This behavior may be due to fear of possible legal consequences of not performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, in patients with very poor prognosis it may be ethically justified to withhold CPR.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2001

Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD CPR) uses a hand-held suction device, applied mid sternum, to compress the chest then actively decompress the chest after each compression. Randomised controlled trials on use of active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation have results which are discordant. OBJECTIVES: To determine clinical effects and safety of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with standard manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (STR). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Heart Group Specialised register (April 2001), the Cochrane library, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We checked the reference list of retrieved articles and contacted enterprises manufacturing the active decompression devices. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized or quasi-randomized studies comparing active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with standard manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with a cardiac arrest who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation by a trained medical or paramedical team. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were independently extracted. All data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The authors of the primary studies were contacted for more information when needed. Studies were cumulated, if appropriate, and pooled relative risk (RR) estimated. Subgroup analysis according to setting (out of hospital or in hospital) and attending team composition (with physician or paramedic only) were predefined. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve trials were included: 10 were in out-of-hospital settings, one set in-hospital only and one had both in-hospital and out-of-hospital components. Allocation concealment was adequate in 4 trials. The two in-hospital studies were very different in quality (A and C) and size (773 and 53 patients). Both found no differences between ACD CPR and STR in any outcome. Trials conducted in out-of-hospital settings cumulated 4162 patients. There were no differences between ACD CPR and STR for mortality either immediately (RR 0.98 [95% CI 0.94 - 1.03]) or at hospital discharge (RR 0.99 [95% CI 0.98 - 1.01]). The pooled RR of neurological impairment, any severity, was 1.71 [95% CI 0.90 - 3.25], with a non-significant trend to more frequent severe neurological damage in survivors of ACD CPR (RR 3.11 [95% CI 0.98 - 9.83]). However, assessment of neurological outcome was limited and there were few patients with neurological damage. There was no difference between ACD CPR and STR with regard complications such as rib or sternal fractures, pneumothorax or hemothorax (RR 1.09 [95% CI 0.86 - 1.38]). Skin trauma and ecchymosis were more frequent with ACD CPR. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Active chest compression-decompression in patients with cardiac arrest is not associated with clear benefit.

Adult↗