Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Cannabinoid receptor modulation of synapses received by cerebellar Purkinje cells.

The high density of cannabinoid receptors in the cerebellum and the degradation of motor coordination produced by cannabinoid intoxication suggest that synaptic transmission in the cerebellum may be strongly regulated by cannabinoid receptors. Therefore the effects of exogenous cannabinoids on synapses received by Purkinje cells were investigated in rat cerebellar slices. Parallel fiber-evoked (PF) excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) were strongly inhibited by bath application of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55212-2 (5 microM, 12% of baseline EPSC amplitude). This effect was completely blocked by the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716. It is unlikely that this was the result of alterations in axonal excitability because fiber volley velocity and kinetics were unchanged and a cannabinoid-induced decrease in fiber volley amplitude was very minor (93% of baseline). WIN 55212-2 had no effect on the amplitude or frequency of spontaneously occurring miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs), suggesting that the effect of CB1 receptor activation on PF EPSCs was presynaptically expressed, but giving no evidence for modulation of release processes after Ca(2+) influx. EPSCs evoked by climbing fiber (CF) stimulation were less powerfully attenuated by WIN 55212-2 (5 microM, 74% of baseline). Large, action potential-dependent, spontaneously occurring inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) were either severely reduced in amplitude (<25% of baseline) or eliminated. Miniature IPSCs (mIPSCs) were reduced in frequency (52% of baseline) but not in amplitude, demonstrating suppression of presynaptic vesicle release processes after Ca(2+) influx and suggesting an absence of postsynaptic modulation. The decrease in mIPSC frequency was not large enough to account for the decrease in sIPSC amplitude, suggesting that presynaptic voltage-gated channel modulation was also involved. Thus, while CB1 receptor activation reduced neurotransmitter release at all major classes of Purkinje cell synapses, this was not accomplished by a single molecular mechanism. At excitatory synapses, cannabinoid suppression of neurotransmitter release was mediated by modulation of voltage-gated channels in the presynaptic axon terminal. At inhibitory synapses, in addition to modulation of presynaptic voltage-gated channels, suppression of the downstream vesicle release machinery also played a large role.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Role of cyclic AMP dependent protein kinase in cannabinoid receptor modulation of potassium "A-current" in cultured rat hippocampal neurons.

Cannabinoid receptor agonists have been previously shown to enhance a potassium A-current (IA) in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. This effect has been further demonstrated to be dependent on G-protein linkage to adenylyl cyclase and levels of intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP). The present study extends this analysis to the involvement of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) in this cascade. Specific activators and inhibitors of PKA were shown to have differential effects on the voltage dependence of IA. Specific activators of PKA produced a negative shift in voltage dependence of IA, whereas PKA inhibitors produced a positive shift in IA voltage dependence, the latter similar to that effected by the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2. Although the negative shift in IA induced by PKA stimulation could be reversed by PKA inhibitors, the positive shift produced by the PKA inhibitors alone was only 50-60% of the cannabinoid-produced shift in IA voltage dependence. This partial effect of PKA inhibition was confirmed by biochemical assays in the same cultured neurons that showed a similar 50-60% decrement in in vitro protein phosphorylation produced by PKA inhibitors. Results are discussed in terms of a diffusible second messenger linkage of the cannabinoid receptor to the A-current channel via the role of protein phosphorylation in modulation of IA.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Protein kinase-dependent phosphorylation and cannabinoid receptor modulation of potassium A current (IA) in cultured rat hippocampal neurons.

The potent cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 produces positive shifts in steady-state inactivation of the potassium A current (IA) in rat hippocampal neurons via an adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP)-, protein kinase A (PKA)-dependent process. This effect is probably mediated by phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of the IA channel protein. The role of protein phosphorylation in this cascade was tested by testing cannabinoid actions in cultured hippocampal neurons (pyramidal cells) that were exposed also to either the catalytic subunit of PKA (PKAc), a PKA-specific phosphorylation inhibitor (IP-20, Walsh peptide), or a potent protein phosphatase inhibitor (okadaic acid). Cannabinoids such as WIN 55,212-2 produce a positive (rightwards) shift in the steady-state inactivation of IA, thus providing increased current at a given membrane voltage. Cells dialyzed with PKAc showed a negative shift in IA inactivation, opposite to that produced by cannabinoids, and similar to that produced by increased levels of cAMP. In addition, PKAc completely blocked the positive shift produced by WIN 55,212-2. In contrast, dialysis of cells with IP-20 produced a positive shift in steady state inactivation of IA, similar to that produced by WIN, but the effects were not additive with cannabinoid receptor activation. The phosphatase inhibitor, okadaic acid produced a small negative shift in IA steady-state inactivation when administered alone, and blocked the positive shift produced by WIN 55,212-2. Okadaic acid also enhanced the negative shift in IA inactivation when co-administered with forskolin. The effects of okadaic acid and WIN 55,212-2 were not additive, suggesting a common pathway. These results demonstrate that IA is altered by direct manipulations of the phosphorylation status of the channel protein, and that cannabinoid effects on IA are probably mediated by dephosphorylation of the IA channel.

8-Bromo Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate↗
PubMed1996

Rat brain cannabinoid receptor modulates N-type Ca2+ channels in a neuronal expression system.

Modulation of neuronal ion channels by the cloned rat brain CB1 cannabinoid receptor was investigated with the use of a heterologous neuronal expression system. Transient expression of the rat brain CB1 cannabinoid receptor was accomplished through microinjection of in vitro transcribed cRNA into the cytoplasm of enzymatically dissociated adult rat superior cervical ganglion neurons. The cannabimimetic aminoalkylindole WIN 55,212-2 inhibited whole-cell Ca2+ currents in neurons injected 16-25 hr previously with rat brain CB1 cannabinoid receptor cRNA. Inhibition of the Ca2+ current was voltage and concentration dependent, with a maximal inhibition of 73% and an IC50 value of 47 nM. The synthetic cannabinoid analogue CP55,940 also inhibited Ca2+ currents, with a maximal inhibition of 38% and an IC50 value of 7 nM. Ca2+ current inhibition was blocked by inclusion of guanosine-5'-O-(2-thiodiphosphate) in the intracellular patch pipette solution or by pretreatment with pertussis toxin. Pretreatment with the N-type Ca2+ channel antagonist omega-conotoxin GVIA reduced the inhibition by 100 nM WIN 55,212-2 from 44% to 6%, indicating that N-type Ca2+ channels are a target of cannabinoid action. On washout of WIN 55,212-2, the Ca2+ current amplitude "overrecovered" in 47% of the neurons tested. Anandamide, the endogenous cannabimimetic compound, had an inconsistent effect on the voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents in the majority of neurons microinjected with cannabinoid receptor cRNA. Ca2+ channels were a specific effector target of the cannabinoid receptor, as two different K+ currents, the M current and the A current, were not modulated by the cannabimimetic WIN 55,212-2.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Cannabinoid receptors differentially modulate potassium A and D currents in hippocampal neurons in culture.

Cannabinoid (CB(1)) receptor activation produced differential effects on voltage-gated outward potassium currents in whole-cell recordings from cultured (7-15 days) rat hippocampal neurons. Voltage-dependent potassium currents A (I(A)) and D (I(D)) were isolated from a composite tetraethylammonium-insensitive current (I(comp)) by blockade with either 4-aminopyridine (500 microM) or dendrotoxin (2 microM) and subtraction of the residual I(A) from I(comp) to reveal I(D). The time constants of inactivation (tau) of I(A) and I(D) as determined in this manner were found to be quite different. The CB(1) agonist WIN 55,212-2 produced a 15- to 20-mV positive shift in voltage-dependent inactivation of I(A) and a simultaneous voltage-independent reduction in the amplitude of I(D) in the same neurons. The EC(50) value for the effect of WIN 55,212-2 on I(D) amplitude (13.9 nM) was slightly lower than the EC(50) value for its effect on I(A) voltage dependence (20.6 nM). Pretreatment with either the CB(1) antagonist SR141716A or pertussis toxin completely blocked the differential effects of WIN 55,212-2 on I(A) and I(D), whereas cellular dialysis with guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate mimicked the action of cannabinoids but blocked the action of simultaneously administered cannabinoid receptor ligands. Finally, the differential effects of cannabinoids on I(A) and I(D) were both shown to be mediated via the well documented cannabinoid receptor inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and subsequent modulation of cAMP and protein kinase. These actions are considered in terms of cAMP-mediated phosphorylation of separate I(A) and I(D) channels and the contribution of each to composite voltage-gated potassium currents in these cells.

4-Aminopyridine↗
PubMed1990

Cannabinoid receptors and modulation of cyclic AMP accumulation in the rat brain.

The mechanism by which cannabinoid compounds produce their effects in the rat brain was evaluated in this investigation. Cannabinoid receptors, quantitated by [3H]CP-55,940 binding, were found in greatest abundance in the rat cortex, cerebellum, hippocampus, and striatum, with smaller but significant binding also found in the hypothalamus, brainstem, and spinal cord. Using rat brain slice preparations, we evaluated the effect of desacetyllevonantradol on basal and forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in the regions exhibiting the greatest cannabinoid receptor density. Desacetyllevonantradol (10 microM) reduced cyclic AMP levels in the hippocampus, frontal cortex, and striatum. In the cerebellum, however, the response to desacetyllevonantradol was biphasic with cyclic AMP accumulation being decreased at lower and increased at higher concentrations. Desacetyllevonantradol reduced cyclic AMP accumulation in isoproterenol-stimulated slices in the cortex and cerebellum, but not in the hippocampus. Cells that responded to vasoactive intestinal peptide with an increase in cyclic AMP accumulation in the hippocampus and cortex also responded to desacetyllevonantradol. The modulation of cyclic AMP accumulation by desacetyllevonantradol could be attenuated following stereotaxic implantation of pertussis toxin, supporting the involvement of a G protein in the cannabinoid response in the brain. However, other actions of cannabinoid compounds may also affect the cyclic AMP levels in brain slice preparations.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2001

Normal human pituitary gland and pituitary adenomas express cannabinoid receptor type 1 and synthesize endogenous cannabinoids: first evidence for a direct role of cannabinoids on hormone modulation at the human pituitary level.

Little is known about the expression and function of cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) in the human pituitary gland. The aim of this study was to investigate CB1 expression in human normal and tumoral pituitaries by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry using an antibody against CB1. CB1 was found in corticotrophs, mammotrophs, somatotrophs, and folliculostellate cells in the anterior lobe of normal pituitary. After examination of 42 pituitary adenomas, CB1 was detected in acromegaly-associated pituitary adenomas, Cushing's adenomas, and prolactinomas, whereas faint or no expression was found in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Experiments with cultured pituitary adenoma cells showed that the CB1 agonist WIN 55,212--2 inhibited GH secretion in most of acromegaly-associated pituitary adenomas tested and that the CB1 antagonist SR 141716A was generally able to reverse this effect. Moreover, WIN 55,212--2 was able to suppress GHRH-stimulated GH release, and this effect was not blocked by coincubation with SR 141716A, possibly indicating a non-CB1-mediated effect. In contrast, WIN 55,212--2 was ineffective on GH-releasing peptide-stimulated GH release. In four Cushing's adenomas tested, WIN 55,212--2 was not able to modify basal ACTH secretion. However, simultaneous application of CRF and WIN 55,212--2 resulted in a synergistic effect on ACTH secretion, and this effect could be abolished by SR 141716A, demonstrating a CB1-mediated effect. In the single case of prolactinomas tested, WIN 55,212--2 was able to inhibit basal secretion of PRL. Finally, the presence of endocannabinoids (anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol) was investigated in normal and tumoral pituitaries. All tumoral samples had higher contents of anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol compared with the normal hypophysis. Moreover, endocannabinoid content in the different pituitary adenomas correlated with the presence of CB1, being elevated in the tumoral samples positive for CB1 and lower in the samples in which no or low levels of CB1 were found. The results of this study point to a direct role of cannabinoids in the regulation of human pituitary hormone secretion.

Adenoma↗
PubMed1997

Examination of the effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist, CP 55,940, on electrically evoked transmitter release from rat brain slices.

In the present study we examined the effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist, [[1 a,2-(R)-5-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-2-[5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyc lohexyl]-phenol; CP 55,940] on [14C]acetylcholine and [3H]norepinephrine release from hippocampal slices and on [14C]acetylcholine release from striatal slices. CP 55,940 potently inhibited electrically evoked [14C]acetylcholine release from hippocampal slices, with an EC50 of 0.02 microM and a maximal inhibition of 61% at 1 microM. The inhibition of acetylcholine release by CP 55,940 was partially antagonized (60%) by the cannabinoid receptor antagonist, [[N-piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-me thyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride; SR 141716A]. Alone, SR 141716A significantly enhanced stimulated [14C]acetylcholine release. In contrast to the effects of CP 55,940 on [14C]acetylcholine release, electrically evoked [3H]norepinephrine release from hippocampal slices and [14C]acetylcholine release from striatal slices were both unaffected by this compound. Similarly, hippocampal [3H]norepinephrine release and striatal [14C]acetylcholine release were not affected by SR 141716A. In conclusion, the results of this study extend our previous data indicating that cannabinoid receptors modulate acetylcholine release in the hippocampus. The effects of cannabinoid receptor activation on [3H]acetylcholine release in the hippocampus does not appear to extend to [3H]norepinephrine release from this region or to acetylcholine release from the striatum.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed1995

Cannabinoids modulate voltage sensitive potassium A-current in hippocampal neurons via a cAMP-dependent process.

Previous studies have shown that cannabinoid receptor analogs increase voltage-dependent potassium A-current (IA) in cultured hippocampal cells. Because cannabinoid receptors inhibit adenylate cyclase, the present study explored whether cAMP played a role in mediating this effect on IA. The specific issue of whether cannabinoid receptor modulation of voltage-dependent IA acts via a cAMP-dependent process was investigated. The cAMP analog, 8-bromo-cAMP, as well as the adenylate cyclase stimulant forskolin, produced concentration-dependent shifts in IA that were opposite those produced by cannabinoid receptor ligands. Moreover, the phosphodiesterase inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine also produced a marked negative shift in the steady-state voltage dependence of IA and increased the effect of forskolin on IA. As shown in previous studies, the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 increased IA via a decrease in steady-state voltage-dependent inactivation of IA. WIN 55,212-2 also reversed the effects of forskolin on IA. The electrophysiological studies were paralleled by direct assays of cAMP in these cells, where cannabinoids inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP by 50% in a pertussis toxin-sensitive manner. The results confirmed that pertussis toxin-sensitive cannabinoid receptor-mediated changes in IA were probably the result of inhibition of adenylate cyclase. The findings are discussed in terms of modulation of IA conductance properties via cannabinoid receptor-mediated inhibition of cAMP levels within the cell.

1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthine↗
PubMed1999

Cannabis and cannabinoids: pharmacology and rationale for clinical use.

It is now known that there are at least two types of cannabinoid receptors. These are CB1 receptors, present mainly on central and peripheral neurones, and CB2 receptors, present mainly on immune cells. Endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonists ('endocannabinoids') have also been identified. The discovery of this 'endogenous cannabinoid system' has led to the development of selective CB1 and CB2 receptor ligands and fueled renewed interest in the clinical potential of cannabinoids. Two cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists are already used clinically, as antiemetics or as appetite stimulants. These are D 9 - tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and nabilone. Other possible uses for CB1 receptor agonists include the suppression of muscle spasm/spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury, the relief of chronic pain and the management of glaucoma and bronchial asthma. CB1 receptor antagonists may also have clinical applications, e. g. as appetite suppressants and in the management of schizophrenia or disorders of cognition and memory. So too may CB2 receptor ligands and drugs that activate cannabinoid receptors indirectly by augmenting endocannabinoid levels at cannabinoid receptors. When taken orally, THC seems to undergo variable absorption and to have a narrow 'therapeutic window' (dose range in which it is effective without producing significant unwanted effects). This makes it difficult to predict an oral dose that will be both effective and tolerable to a patient and indicates a need for better cannabinoid formulations and modes of administration. For the therapeutic potential of cannabis or CB1 receptor agonists to be fully exploited, it will be important to establish objectively and conclusively (a) whether these agents have efficacy against selected symptoms that is of clinical significance and, if so, whether the benefits outweigh the risks, (b) whether cannabis has therapeutic advantages over individual cannabinoids, (c) whether there is a need for additional drug treatments to manage any of the disorders against which cannabinoids are effective, and (d) whether it will be possible to develop drugs that have reduced psychotropic activity and yet retain the ability to act through CB1 receptors to produce their sought-after effects.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed2000

Natural and synthetic endocannabinoids and their structure-activity relationships.

During the past several years, cannabinoid biology has witnessed marked advances that has propelled it to the forefront of biomedical research. These new developments have also provided an opportunity to examine the physiological and biochemical events underlying the use and abuse of cannabis as well as elucidating the biological role of the endogenous cannabinoid ligands (endocannabinoids). The biological targets for endocannabinoids include the cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2), the enzyme anandamide amidohydrolase (AAH), and the carrier protein referred to as the anandamide transporter (ANT). The identification of arachidonylethanolamide (anandamide, AEA) as an endogenous cannabinoid has been an important development in cannabinoid research which has led to the identification of two proteins associated with cannabinoid physiology in addition to the CB1 and CB2 receptors. These proteins are anandamide amidohydrolase (AAH), an enzyme responsible for the hydrolytic breakdown of anandamide and the anandamide transporter (ANT), a carrier protein involved in the transport of anandamide across the cell membrane. Evidence obtained so far suggests that these two proteins, in combination, are responsible for the termination of the biological actions of anandamide. Also, the discovery of anandamide has revealed a novel class of more selective agents possessing somewhat different pharmacological properties than the cannabinoids. A number of such analogs have now been reported many of which possess markedly improved cannabinoid receptor affinities and metabolic stabilities compared to those of the parent ligand. Generally, anandamide and all known analogs exhibit significant selectivities with high affinities for the CB1 receptor and modest to very low affinity for the CB2 receptor. In a relatively short period of time, pharmacological and biochemical studies have confirmed initial speculations that anandamide is either a neuromodulator or neurotransmitter and has significantly advanced our understanding of cannabinoid biochemistry. This summary seeks to define the pharmacology of endocannabinoids and to focus on the structure-activity relationships (SAR) of anandamide for the CB1 cannabinoid receptor.

Amidohydrolases↗
PubMed2001

Mechanisms of endocannabinoid inactivation: biochemistry and pharmacology.

The endocannabinoids, a family of endogenous lipids that activate cannabinoid receptors, are released from cells in a stimulus-dependent manner by cleavage of membrane lipid precursors. After release, the endocannabinoids are rapidly deactivated by uptake into cells and enzymatic hydrolysis. Endocannabinoid reuptake occurs via a carrier-mediated mechanism, which has not yet been molecularly characterized. Endocannabinoid reuptake has been demonstrated in discrete brain regions and in various tissues and cells throughout the body. Inhibitors of endocannabinoid reuptake include N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-arachidonylamide (AM404), which blocks transport with IC50 (concentration necessary to produce half-maximal inhibition) values in the low micromolar range. AM404 does not directly activate cannabinoid receptors or display cannabimimetic activity in vivo. Nevertheless, AM404 increases circulating anandamide levels and inhibits motor activity, an effect that is prevented by the CB1 cannabinoid antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride (SR141716A). AM404 also reduces behavioral responses to dopamine agonists and normalizes motor activity in a rat model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The endocannabinoids are hydrolyzed by an intracellular membrane-bound enzyme, termed anandamide amidohydrolase (AAH), which has been molecularly cloned. Several fatty acid sulfonyl fluorides inhibit AAH activity irreversibly with IC50 values in the low nanomolar range and protect anandamide from deactivation in vivo. alpha-Keto-oxazolopyridines inhibit AAH activity with high potency (IC50 values in the low picomolar range). A more thorough characterization of the roles of endocannabinoids in health and disease will be necessary to define the significance of endocannabinoid inactivation mechanisms as targets for therapeutic drugs.

Amidohydrolases↗
PubMed2001

The neurobiology and evolution of cannabinoid signalling.

The plant Cannabis sativa has been used by humans for thousands of years because of its psychoactivity. The major psychoactive ingredient of cannabis is Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, which exerts effects in the brain by binding to a G-protein-coupled receptor known as the CB1 cannabinoid receptor. The discovery of this receptor indicated that endogenous cannabinoids may occur in the brain, which act as physiological ligands for CB1. Two putative endocannabinoid ligands, arachidonylethanolamide ('anandamide') and 2-arachidonylglycerol, have been identified, giving rise to the concept of a cannabinoid signalling system. Little is known about how or where these compounds are synthesized in the brain and how this relates to CB1 expression. However, detailed neuroanatomical and electrophysiological analysis of mammalian nervous systems has revealed that the CB1 receptor is targeted to the presynaptic terminals of neurons where it acts to inhibit release of 'classical' neurotransmitters. Moreover, an enzyme that inactivates endocannabinoids, fatty acid amide hydrolase, appears to be preferentially targeted to the somatodendritic compartment of neurons that are postsynaptic to CB1-expressing axon terminals. Based on these findings, we present here a model of cannabinoid signalling in which anandamide is synthesized by postsynaptic cells and acts as a retrograde messenger molecule to modulate neurotransmitter release from presynaptic terminals. Using this model as a framework, we discuss the role of cannabinoid signalling in different regions of the nervous system in relation to the characteristic physiological actions of cannabinoids in mammals, which include effects on movement, memory, pain and smooth muscle contractility. The discovery of the cannabinoid signalling system in mammals has prompted investigation of the occurrence of this pathway in non-mammalian animals. Here we review the evidence for the existence of cannabinoid receptors in non-mammalian vertebrates and invertebrates and discuss the evolution of the cannabinoid signalling system. Genes encoding orthologues of the mammalian CB1 receptor have been identified in a fish, an amphibian and a bird, indicating that CB1 receptors may occur throughout the vertebrates. Pharmacological actions of cannabinoids and specific binding sites for cannabinoids have been reported in several invertebrate species, but the molecular basis for these effects is not known. Importantly, however, the genomes of the protostomian invertebrates Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans do not contain CB1 orthologues, indicating that CB1-like cannabinoid receptors may have evolved after the divergence of deuterostomes (e.g. vertebrates and echinoderms) and protostomes. Phylogenetic analysis of the relationship of vertebrate CB1 receptors with other G-protein-coupled receptors reveals that the paralogues that appear to share the most recent common evolutionary origin with CB1 are lysophospholipid receptors, melanocortin receptors and adenosine receptors. Interestingly, as with CB1, each of these receptor types does not appear to have Drosophila orthologues, indicating that this group of receptors may not occur in protostomian invertebrates. We conclude that the cannabinoid signalling system may be quite restricted in its phylogenetic distribution, probably occurring only in the deuterostomian clade of the animal kingdom and possibly only in vertebrates.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cardiovascular actions of cannabinoids and their generation during shock.

Marijuana is a widely abused recreational drug well known for its psychoactive properties. Cannabinoids, the active ingredients of marijuana, elicit their neurobehavioral effects by interacting with the CB1 cannabinoid receptor subtype, expressed primarily in the brain but also present in some peripheral tissues. A second receptor subtype, the CB2 receptor, is expressed on cells of the immune system and is thought to be responsible for the immunosuppressant effects of cannabinoids. Recently, endogenous lipidlike substances have been identified, including arachidonyl ethanolamide (anandamide) and 2-arachidonyl glyceride, that bind to cannabinoid receptors and mimic many of the neurobehavioral effects of plant-derived cannabinoids. Both plant-derived cannabinoids and the endogenous ligands have been shown to elicit hypotension and bradycardia via activation of peripherally located CB1 receptors. Possible underlying mechanisms include presynaptic CB1 receptor mediated inhibition of norepinephrine release from peripheral sympathetic nerve terminals, and/or direct vasodilation via activation of vascular cannabinoid receptors. The latter may also be the target of endocannabinoids of vascular endothelial origin. Recent studies indicate that a peripheral endogenous cannabinoid system in circulating macrophages and platelets is activated in hemorrhagic and septic shock and may contribute to the hypotension associated with these conditions via activation of vascular cannabinoid receptors. The potential role of this mechanism in human shock conditions is under investigation.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

The endogenous cannabinoid system and brain development.

Cannabinoid receptors and their endogenous ligands constitute a novel modulatory system that is involved in specific brain functions, such as nociception, control of movement, memory and neuroendocrine regulation. Recently, it has also been suggested that this system is involved in brain development. Studies have used a variety of techniques to elucidate the effects of cannabinoids during development, as well as to characterize the presence of elements of the endogenous cannabinoid system (receptors and ligands) in the developing brain. Collectively, they suggest that endocannabinoids participate in brain development through the activation of second-messenger-coupled cannabinoid receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

The role of cannabinoids in neurodegenerative diseases.

An understanding of the actions of Cannabis (Marijuana) has evolved from folklore to science over the previous hundred years. This progression was spurred by the discovery of an endogenous cannabinoid system consisting of two receptors and two endogenous ligands. This system appears to be intricately involved in normal physiology, specifically in the control of movement, formation of memories and appetite control. As we are developing an increased understanding of the physiological role of endocannabinoids it is becoming clear that they may be involved in the pathology of several neurological diseases. Furthermore an array of potential therapeutic targets is being determined--including specific cannabinoid agonists and antagonists as well as compounds that interrupt the synthesis, uptake or metabolism of the endocannabinoids. This article reviews the recent progress in understanding the contribution of endocannabinoids to the pathology and therapy of Huntington's disease. Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia and tremor.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Novel physiologic functions of endocannabinoids as revealed through the use of mutant mice.

The presence in the mammalian brain of specific receptors for marijuana triggered a search for endogenous ligands, several of which have been recently identified. There has been growing interest in the possible physiological functions of endocannabinoids, and mutant mice that lack cannabinoid receptors have become an important tool in the search for such functions. To date, studies using CB1 knockout mice have supported the possible role of endocannabinoids in retrograde synaptic inhibition in the hippocampus, in long-term potentiation and memory, in the development of opiate dependence, and in the control of appetite and food intake. They also suggested the existence of as yet unidentified cannabinoid receptors in the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. The use of CB2 receptor knockout mice suggested a role for this receptor in macrophage-mediated helper T cell activation. Further studies will undoubtedly reveal many additional roles for this novel signaling system.

Animals↗