Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[Pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and cyclophosphamide metabolites in the mouse and their influence on the therapeutic effect of "activated" cyclophosphamide (4-hydroxycyclophosphamide) (author's transl)].

Therapy tests with 2- [bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]tetrahydro (2H)-1,3,2-oxazaphosphorinane-2-oxide (cyclophosphamide (CP)) and its metabolites 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (4-OH-CP) and phosphoramide mustard (NLDP) were carried out on heterotransplanted human breast cancer in nude mice. The results are: 1. Only 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide can imitate the therapeutic effect of cyclophosphamide. 2. The therapeutic effect is not proportional to the product of concentration and time (cXt) in blood as tumor growth was more inhibited with lower cXt when high concentrations were present over a short time than with higher cXt and adjustment of low concentrations over a long time. Pharmacokinetic measurements in mice demonstrated that this behaviour is due to the elimination of "activated" cyclophosphamide by Michaelis-Menten kinetics (Km = 146 nmol X ml-1, Vmax = 18 nmol X ml-1 X min-1) and to the fact that increasing blood concentration of "activated" cyclophosphamide is accompanied by its increased distribution towards the peripheral compartment as may be seen from the volumes of distribution of the peripheral and central compartments. From blood concentration curves of cyclophosphamide and cyclophosphamide metabolites we calculated that 91% of the cyclophosphamide administered is activated. 81% of the "activated" cyclophosphamide is detoxified to 4-keto-CP and carboxyphosphamide (Carboxyph). Since the detoxifying enzymatic system is more active against aldophosphamide than against 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide the non-detoxified rest of "activated" cyclophosphamide is composed of 80% of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide and 20% of aldophosphamide.

Animals↗

Etoposide combined with cyclophosphamide plus vincristine compared with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide plus vincristine and with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus vincristine in the treatment of small-cell carcinoma of the lung: a randomized trial of the Bristol Lung Cancer Study Group.

A total of 353 patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were accrued in this multicenter trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following three regimens: cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV day 1, and etoposide 50 mg/m2 IV day 1, followed by etoposide 100 mg/m2/day orally days 2 through 5 (CEV); cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m2 IV day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV day 1, and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV day 1 (CAV); cyclophosphamide 2,000 mg/m2 day 1 and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV day 1 (CV). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Treatment groups were comparable with respect to extent of disease, age, sex, performance status, and metastatic sites. No significant differences in response rates, response duration, or survival could be detected in limited disease, although there appeared to be a trend favoring CEV. Among extensive-disease patients, response duration on the CEV regimen was longer than on the CV regimen or the CAV program (P less than .001). The superiority of the CEV regimen was also demonstrated in the survival analysis in which differences attained statistical significance (P = .01). In this group the median survival was increased from 29 weeks on CV to 31 weeks on CAV and 39 weeks on CEV. Myelosuppression was the most frequent toxicity. It was more severe with CV than CEV or CAV. Most nonhematologic side effects were comparable among the three treatment groups. However, the high doses of cyclophosphamide in the CV regimen produced a higher incidence of hemorrhagic cystitis than in the CEV or CAV programs (P less than .001). Cardiotoxicity only occurred in the CAV group (P = .05). The addition of etoposide to the CV regimen resulted in significantly longer response duration and survival without increased toxicity. Similarly, the substitution of etoposide for the doxorubicin in the CAV regimen was associated with prolonged survival and reduced cardiotoxicity.

Adult↗

Investigation on cyclophosphamide treatment during the preimplantation period. II. In vitro studies on the effects of cyclophosphamide and its metabolites 4-OH-cyclophosphamide, phosphoramide mustard, and acrolein on blastulation of four-cell and eight-cell mouse embryos and on their subsequent development during implantation.

Preimplantation mouse embryos were cultured for 48 hours from the four-cell and eight-cell stage to the blastocyst stage in the presence of cyclophosphamide (CPA) or one of its metabolites-4-hydroperoxy-CPA (4-HP-CPA), phosphoramide mustard (PAM), and acrolein (Acr)--to identify the metabolite which is embryotoxic after CPA treatment of pregnant mice during the preimplantation period. The dose-response relations for the inhibition of blastulation revealed identical inhibition curves for PAM and 4-HP-CPA (in solution 4-HP-CPA immediately decomposes to 4-hydroxy-CPA (4-OH-CPA)). These two metabolites are inhibiting blastulation in vitro at concentrations that are 10,000 times lower than CPA and 100 times lower than acrolein. When blastocysts which had developed in the presence of CPA and its metabolites in vitro were subsequently cultured in inhibitor-free medium NCTC-109, the same dose-response relationship pattern was obtained. Since 4-OH-CPA decomposes into acrolein and PAM in vivo and in vitro and since PAM and 4-OH-CPA exhibit identical embryotoxicity towards preimplantation embryos in vitro, PAM probably also is an active embryotoxic CPA metabolite in vivo before implantation. This result is discussed in relation to the importance of alkylating CPA metabolites in cancer treatment and in teratological studies during organogenesis.

Acrolein↗

Cyclophosphamide for rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the short-term effects of cyclophosphamide for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group's Register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline and Embase up to and including July 1997. We also carried out a handsearch of the reference lists of the trials retrieved from the electronic search. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing oral cyclophosphamide against placebo (or an active drug at a dosage considered to be ineffective) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data abstraction was carried out independently by two reviewers. The same two reviewers using Jadad's scale (Jadad 1995) assessed the methodological quality of the RCTs and CCTs. Rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures were extracted from the publications for baseline and end-of-study. The pooled analysis was performed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) for joint counts. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) were used for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Toxicity was evaluated with pooled odds ratios for withdrawals. A chi-square test was used to assess heterogeneity among trials. Fixed effects models were used throughout. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included in the pooled analysis of two trials, 31 receiving cyclophosphamide. A statistically significant benefit was observed for cyclophosphamide when compared to placebo for tender and swollen joint scores: SMDs were -0.57 and -0.59 respectively. The difference in ESR also favoured the active drug but did not reach statistical significance (-12 mm, 95%CI: -26 to 2.5). One trial reported the number of patients developing new or worse erosions: the OR for cyclophosphamide compared to placebo was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.57). Patients receiving placebo were six times more likely to discontinue treatment because of lack of efficacy than patients receiving cyclophosphamide. Withdrawals from adverse reactions were higher in the cyclophosphamide group (Odds ratio=2.9), although this difference was not statistically significant. Side effects from cyclophosphamide included hemorrhagic cystitis, nausea, vomiting, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, alopecia, amenorrhea and herpes zoster infections. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Cyclophosphamide appears to have a clinically and statistically significant benefit on the disease activity of patients with RA, similar to some disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as antimalarials or sulfasalazine, but lower than methotrexate. Toxicity however is severe, limiting its use given the low benefit-risk ratio compared to other antirheumatic agents.

Antirheumatic Agents↗

[In vitro assay for cyclophosphamide-sensitivity of human tumours: the effect of 4-hydro-peroxy-cyclophosphamide on the incorporation of 3H-uridine into the nucleic acids of human tumour cells (author's transl)].

The utility of 4-hydro-peroxy-cyclophosphamide for testing the selectivity of human tumours cells against cyclophosphamide in vitro was studied. 4-hydro-peroxy-cyclophosphamide in aqueous solution spontaneously decomposes to 4-hydroxy-cyclophosphamide, the primary product of metabolic activation of cyclophosphamide thus representing a new form of "activated" cyclophosphamide. From 31 human tumours including 21 mammarian-, 4 ovarial-, 2 uterine-carcinomas, 2 seminomas, 1 hypernephroma and 1 rectum-carcinoma cell suspensions were made and the effect on the 3H-Uridine- and the 3H-Thymidine-incorporation into the nucleic acids after short time incubation with the effect of 4-hydro-peroxy-cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxy-cyclophosphamide. 7 malignomas showed high sensitivity both against 4-hydro-peroxy-cyclophosphamide and against 4-hydroxy-cyclophosphamide. No additional inhibitory effect of the peroxyde function besides of that of the alkylating moiety of the molecule was found. Accordingly 4-hydro-peroxy-cyclophosphamide because of its better availibility and stability may be used as "activated" cyclophosphamide in screening tests for cyclophosphamide-sensivity of human tumours in vitro.

Adult↗

Phase I trial of carboplatin-cyclophosphamide and iproplatin-cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

The Southwest Oncology Group has carried out a phase I clinical trial of carboplatin plus cyclophosphamide and iproplatin plus cyclophosphamide in 20 patients with stages III and IV ovarian cancer prior to initiating a phase III trial to compare these platinum analog-cyclophosphamide combinations with standard cisplatin-cyclophosphamide therapy. Myelosuppression proved the dose-limiting toxicity of both the carboplatin (300 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and iproplatin (180 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) regimens. Evaluating up to six courses of therapy (repeated at 4-week intervals), the median nadir WBC and platelet counts associated with carboplatin-cyclophosphamide therapy were 1800 (range, 900-4000) and 69 000 per microliter, respectively, and those associated with iproplatin-cyclophosphamide therapy were 1400 (1100-1600) and 140 000 per microliter, respectively. Although the starting doses of carboplatin and iproplatin required a median decrease of 25%, the median doses of each administered through six courses of therapy were 300 and 180 mg/m2, respectively. Neither nephrotoxicity nor neuropathy were experienced by the patients, but mild to moderate nausea and vomiting occurred in more than 75% of those treated with either drug combination. Alopecia of mild to severe degree was observed in 40% of patients. Although the results of this phase I trial are still preliminary, we can recommend for future phase III trials 300 mg/m2 carboplatin and 180 mg/m2 iproplatin when combined with 600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide repeated a 4-week intervals for six treatment courses.

Adult↗

Effects of chlordiazepoxide, diazepam and oxazepam on the antitumor activity, the lethality and the blood level of active metabolites of cyclophosphamide and cyclophosphamide oxidase activity in mice.

Effects of chlordiazepoxide, diazepam and oxazepam on the antitumor activity and acute toxicity of cyclophosphamide and the level of its active metabolites in the plasma were investigated in mice. Cyclophosphamide was administered 24 h after the final injection of chlordiazepoxide, diazepam or oxazepam (100 mg/kg/d for 3 d, i.p.). Pretreatment with these drugs increased the acute toxicity of cyclophosphamide (300 or 450 mg/kg, i.p.), whereas drugs had no effect on the antitumor activity of cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg, i.p.) against Ehrlich solid carcinoma. A high level of active metabolites of cyclophosphamide in the plasma after the administration of cyclophosphamide (300 or 450 mg/kg, i.p.) was observed in chlordiazepoxide-, diazepam- or oxazepam-treated mice. On the other hand, chlordiazepoxide, diazepam or oxazepam enhanced significantly the activity of cyclophosphamide oxidase in hepatic microsomes. It is concluded that potentiation of the acute toxicity at a high dose of cyclophosphamide by chlordiazepoxide, diazepam and oxazepam is due to an induction of microsomal drug-metabolizing enzyme which are responsible for the in vivo activation of cyclophosphamide.

Animals↗

Cyclophosphamide (NSC 26271) versus the combination of adriamycin (NSC 123127), 5-fluorouracil (NSC 19893), and cyclophosphamide in the treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer: a randomized trial.

Twenty-seven patients with a diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated in a randomized, prospective trial with either Cyclophosphamide or a combination of Adriamycin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Cyclophosphamide. Doses were either Cyclophosphamide alone (800-1200 mg/m2 iv q 3 weeks) or Cyclophosphamide (150-200 mg/m2 po Day 3-6) plus 5-FU (400-500 mg/m2 iv Day 1, 8) plus Adriamycin (30-50 mg/m2 iv Day 1) given as a 4 week treatment cycle. Patients with compromised bone marrow reserve initially received the lower dose level. Objectively stable disease as defined by a modification of the National Prostatic Cancer Project criteria was seen in 53% of the 15 Cyclophosphamide treated patients and in 50% of the 12 combination treated patients. Survival was not significantly different in the two arms. However, the survival of patients responding to Cyclophosphamide was significantly longer than that of patients responding to the combination (median 18.6 months versus 8.1 months, p less than 0.05). Gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity was moderate with both regimens. Therefore, in the present study, Cyclophosphamide alone was as effective as the combination of Cyclophosphamide, 5-FU and Adriamycin for patients with disseminated prostatic carcinoma. The moderate hematologic toxicity noted with both regimens suggests further evaluation of drug combinations utilizing higher dosages of active agents in this disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Induction of specific-locus and dominant-lethal mutations by cyclophosphamide and combined cyclophosphamide-radiation treatment in male mice.

Cyclophosphamide is the most widely used antineoplastic agent. It is also used to condition patients for bone-marrow transplantations. Because of the general interest of this compound we initiated a systematic study of the induction of dominant-lethal and specific-locus mutations in male mice. In addition, we investigated the induction of specific-locus mutations by the combined treatment of cyclophosphamide and ionizing radiation. A dose of 40 mg/kg bw of cyclophosphamide caused dominant-lethal mutations in male mice only in the 1st and 2nd week after treatment. A dose of 120 mg/kg induced dominant-lethal mutations in the mating intervals 1-21 days posttreatment. No dominant lethal mutations were observed after the 3rd week. The same differential spermatogenic response was observed for the induction of specific-locus mutations. Cyclophosphamide induced recessive mutations exclusively in spermatozoa and spermatids. No mutations were recovered from treated spermatocytes and spermatogonia. In contrast to cyclophosphamide, radiation induces specific-locus mutations in all germ-cell stages. The pretreatment with cyclophosphamide 24 h before radiation enhanced the frequency of specific-locus mutations in spermatogonia. The distribution of the observed mutations among the 7 loci and their viability supports the hypothesis that these mutations were induced by radiation rather than by cyclophosphamide. The compound causes an immediate inhibition of DNA and RNA synthesis in spermatogonia. The inhibition very likely interferes with the repair process. The disturbance of the repair process is probably the cause of the synergistic effect for the induction of specific-locus mutations in spermatogonia of mice after pretreatment with cyclophosphamide 24 h before irradiation.

Animals↗

Increased intensification and total dose of cyclophosphamide in a doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen for the treatment of primary breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-22.

PURPOSE: The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) initiated a randomized trial (B-22) to determine if intensifying but maintaining the total dose of cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology, Princeton, NJ) in a doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Pharmacia, Kalamazoo, MI)-cyclophosphamide combination (AC), or if intensifying and increasing the total dose of cyclophosphamide improves the outcome of women with primary breast cancer and positive axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 2,305) were randomized to receive either four courses of standard AC therapy (group 1); intensified therapy, in which the same total dose of cyclophosphamide was administered in two courses (group 2); or intensified and increased therapy, in which the total dose of cyclophosphamide was doubled (group 3). The dose and intensity of doxorubicin were similar in all groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were determined using life-table estimates. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in DFS (P = .30) or overall survival (P = .95) among the groups through 5 years. At 5 years, the DFS of women in group 1 was similar to that of women in group 2 (62% v 60%, respectively; P = .43) and to that of women in group 3 (62% v 64%, respectively; P = .59). The 5-year survival of women in group 1 was similar to that of women in group 2 (78% v 77%, respectively; P = .86) and to that of women in group 3 (78% v 77%, respectively; P = .82). Grade 4 toxicity increased in groups 2 and 3. Failure to note a difference in outcome among the groups was unrelated to either differences in amount and intensity of cyclophosphamide or to dose delays and intervals between courses of therapy. CONCLUSION: Intensifying or intensifying and increasing the total dose of cyclophosphamide failed to significantly improve either DFS or overall survival in any group. It was concluded that, outside of a clinical trial, dose-intensification of cyclophosphamide in an AC combination represents inappropriate therapy for women with primary breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Meta-analysis of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy of ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival with cisplatin, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cyclophosphamide versus that of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, to evaluate the effect of dose intensity, and to evaluate meta-analysis methodology. METHODS: Meta-analysis was done on 30 studies of 2060 women with stages III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer. All had 3-year survival data, adequate follow-up, no other chemotherapy, no radiation therapy, and had information for various prognostic variables (age, stage, grade, and residual disease). We used four different methods of meta-analysis: pooled published data and modified effect-size analyses of the entire group (30 studies), and pooled published data and effect-size analyses of the subset of five prospective randomized studies. RESULTS: Three-year survival for the entire group was 43% for cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus 36% for cisplatin and cyclophosphamide; for the five prospective randomized studies, the rates were 46 and 35%, respectively. The survival advantage of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide was statistically significant when analyzed by the pooled published data and modified effect-size meta-analysis of the entire group and the pooled published data meta-analysis of the five prospective randomized studies. The effect-size meta-analysis of the five prospective studies did not reach statistical significance. Total dose intensity and doxorubicin dose intensity were not significantly associated with survival advantage in cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide use. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be a survival advantage to treatment with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus treatment with cisplatin and cyclophosphamide. We believe this to be due to the properties of multiagent chemotherapy (the addition of doxorubicin) rather than to increased dose intensity. In addition, we believe that physicians need to familiarize themselves with meta-analysis methodology.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

The metabolism of cyclophosphamide. Dose dependency and the effect of long-term treatment with cyclophosphamide.

Studies on the metabolism of cyclophosphamide-14C were performed in 10 subjects at different single dose levels within the range of 0.02-10 mg/kg body-weight and in five subjects before and following an average 22 days treatment with cyclophosphamide in daily doses of 2 mg/kg. The parameters of cyclophosphamide metabolism--serum half-life of unchanged cyclophosphamide, serum concentration of metabolites, and rates of excretion of cyclophosphamide and metabolites in the urine--were all independent of dose. No change of the metabolism was demonstrated after treatment with cyclophosphamide for 22 days.

Cyclophosphamide↗

A comparison of adriamycin versus vincristine and adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide versus vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide for advanced sarcoma.

This randomized study, conducted by the Eastern cooperative Oncology Group, compared Adriamycin (doxorubicin) (70 mg/m2) versus vincristine (1.4 mg/m2) and Adriamycin (50 mg/m2); and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) versus vincristine (1.4 mg/m2), actinomycin-D (0.4 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) for treatment of metastatic mesenchymal malignancies. The respective response rate seen in 200 evaluable patients to the treatments were, 27, 19, and 11%. The response rate to Adriamycin was significant better than the response to vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide (P = 0.03, two-sided). The respective median survivals on the three treatments were 37, 34, and 41 weeks and were not significantly different. Moderate or severe vomiting occurred in 60% of patients receiving vincristine-cyclophosphamide-adriamycin, a greater frequency than in Adriamycin alone (P = .09 two-sided) Severe or life-threatening hematologic toxicity (leukocytes less than 2000, platelets less than 50,000) occurred in 30% of patients receiving the Adriamycin combination, a markedly increased frequency when compared to the other two regimens (P equals 0.07, P = 0.02, two-sided). This trial establishes that Adriamycin has a better response rate than the combination of vincristine-actinomycin-D-cyclophosphamide in advanced sarcomas. The combination of vincristine, Adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide increased toxicity and did not add to the therapeutic effect achieved with Adriamycin alone.

Adult↗

Mouse lymphosarcomas sensitive and resistant to cyclophosphamide therapy: activity of cathepsins B, L, and D during various schemes of treatment with cyclophosphamide and SE-glycan.

We measured activities of cysteine (cathepsins B and L) and aspartyl proteinases (cathepsin D) in tumor tissue of mice with sensitive and resistant lymphosarcomas. In cyclophosphamide-resistant lymphosarcoma tissue activities of cathepsins B, L, and D were lower than in cyclophosphamide-sensitive lymphosarcoma. After treatment with cyclophosphamide in high doses enzyme activities in mice with cyclophosphamide-resistant lymphosarcoma increased more significantly than in animals with cyclophosphamide-sensitive lymphosarcoma. Sulfoethylated beta-1,3-D-glycan potentiated the effect of cyclophosphamide in mice with both forms of lymphosarcoma. This drug in the lowest dose (10 mg/kg) was most effective.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Improved therapeutic index of carboplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide: final report by the Southwest Oncology Group of a phase III randomized trial in stages III and IV ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare cisplatin-cyclophosphamide versus carboplatin-cyclophosphamide as primary chemotherapy for stage III (suboptimal) and stage IV ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred forty-two patients were randomly assigned to treatment with six courses of intravenous (i.v.) cisplatin 100 mg/m2 plus i.v. cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, or i.v. carboplatin 300 mg/m2 plus i.v. cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. RESULTS: The estimated median survivals were 17.4 and 20.0 months for the cisplatin and carboplatin study arms, respectively. The null hypothesis of a 30% survival superiority with the cisplatin arm was rejected at the P = .02 level. Clinical response rates were 52% for the cisplatin arm and 61% for the carboplatin arm. Pathologic complete response rates were similar for both study arms. There was less thrombocytopenia on the cisplatin arm (P less than .001); however, there was less nausea and emesis (P less than or equal to .001 for courses 1 to 5), renal toxicity (P less than .001), anemia (P = .01), hearing loss (P less than .001), tinnitus (P = .01), neuromuscular toxicities (P = .001), and alopecia (P less than .001) on the carboplatin arm. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin-cyclophosphamide proved to have a significantly better therapeutic index than cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in patients with stage III (suboptimal) and stage IV ovarian cancer.

Adult↗

Phase III trial comparing two dose levels of epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare a full-dose epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (HEC) regimen with classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) therapy and with a moderate-dose epirubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen (EC) in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Node-positive breast cancer patients who were aged 70 years or younger were randomly allocated to one of the following treatments: CMF for six cycles (oral cyclophosphamide); EC for eight cycles (epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2); day 1 every 3 weeks); and HEC for eight cycles (epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 830 mg/m(2); day 1 every 3 weeks). RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-five, 267, and 255 eligible patients were treated with CMF, EC, and HEC, respectively. Patient characteristics were well balanced among the three arms. One and three cases of congestive heart failure were reported in the EC and HEC arms, respectively. Three cases of acute myeloid leukemia were reported in the HEC arm. After 4 years of median follow-up, no statistically significant differences were observed between HEC and CMF (event-free survival [EFS]: hazards ratio [HR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.31, P =.80; distant-EFS: HR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.34, P =.87; overall survival [OS]: HR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.44, P =.87). HEC is more effective than EC (EFS: HR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.99, P =.04; distant-EFS: HR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02, P =.06; OS HR = 0.69, 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.00, P =.05). CONCLUSION: This three-arm study does not show an advantage in favor of an adequately dosed epirubicin-based regimen over classical CMF in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive pre- and postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Moreover, this study confirms that there is a dose-response curve for epirubicin in breast cancer adjuvant therapy.

Adult↗

Interactions between cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin metabolism in rats. II. Effect of cyclophosphamide on the aldoketoreductase system.

Under anaerobic conditions, in comparison to liver microsomes obtained from normal controls, liver microsomes obtained from rats pretreated with cyclophosphamide formed significantly less 7-deoxydoxorubicinol aglycone (P less than or equal to .05), whereas the disappearance of doxorubicin and the formation of 7-deoxydoxorubicin aglycone were unaffected. When directly investigated, the reduction of 7-deoxydoxorubicin aglycone to 7-deoxydoxorubicinol aglycone by microsomes was inhibited by cyclophosphamide pretreatment. Liver cytosols from controls and cyclophosphamide-treated rats reduced daunorubicin to daunorubicinol and 7-deoxydoxorubicin aglycone to 7-deoxydoxorubicinol aglycone at the same rate, which indicates the lack of effect of cyclophosphamide pretreatment on the cytosolic aldoketoreductase. The results suggest the existence of a microsomal carbonyl reduction system for anthracycline antibiotics and indicate that cyclophosphamide does affect the metabolism of doxorubicin; in rats, this interaction results only in an alteration of the relative concentrations of presumably inactive metabolites, the 7-deoxyaglycones. The importance of these findings for the pharmacological interaction between doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in humans remains to be investigated.

Alcohol Oxidoreductases↗

Cyclophosphamide (NSC-26271) maintenance therapy after a second remission of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: comparative clinical trial (standard dose versus intermittent high dose versus cyclophosphamide plus cytosine arabinoside (NSC-63878)).

Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who had experienced only one relapse were reinduced into remission using a 6-week induction course of prednisone and vincristine. One hundred fifty-one children who achieved a second complete marrow remission were randomly assigned to one of three cyclophosphamide treatment groups for maintanence. Forty-one children received standard-dose cyclophosphamide (3 mg/kg/day), 55 received intermittent high-dose cyclophosphamide (10 mg/kg/day for 4 days out of 14), and 55 received a combination of oral cyclophosphamide (3 mg/kg/day) plus cytosine arabinoside (3 mg/kg/week im). The standard-dose cyclophosphamide regimen resulted in a remission maintenance time of 109 days and was the least toxic of the three maintenance regimens. Giving cyclophosphamide on an intermittent high-dose schedule or combining it with cytosine arabinoside did not increase the remission maintanence time (105 days).

Bone Marrow↗