Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CELIAC PLEXUS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms associated with celiac axis stenosis due to compression by median arcuate ligament and celiac plexus.

Celiac axis stenosis is frequently associated with pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms. Although the cause of stenosis was not clear in most of the reported cases, compression of the median arcuate ligament of the diaphragm was found to be responsible for the stenosis in 7 of 42 reported cases of this type of aneurysm. We report a case of aneurysm caused by compression of the median arcuate ligament of the diaphragm and celiac plexus. An asymptomatic 43-year-old Japanese man was admitted with a low echoic lesion in the uncus of pancreas. Computed tomographic scan and angiogram revealed stenosis of the celiac axis and two aneurysms in the inferior posterior pancreaticoduodenal artery. The celiac plexus and median arcuate ligament were divided surgically and normal flow was reestablished in the celiac axis. One of the aneurysms was resected and the afferent artery of the other aneurysm was ligated. In the setting of pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm associated with celiac axis stenosis, management of stenosis should be considered in addition to local treatment of the aneurysm. In this context, division of median arcuate ligament and celiac plexus or aorto-celiac bypass may normalize the flows in the pancreaticoduodenal arcade and could be effective in preventing aneurysm reformation.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided injection: a close look at celiac plexus block and celiac plexus neurolysis.

This article describes the use of interventional endoscopic ultrasonography, namely, endoscopic ultrasound-guided injection therapy for the treatment of pain. With the assistance of endoscopic ultrasonography, it is now possible to safely inject the celiac plexus with pharmacological agents to provide analgesia in painful pancreatic conditions such as cancer and chronic pancreatitis. The indications for celiac plexus injection, the procedure, required accessories, complications, and nursing care are discussed.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided (neurolytic) celiac plexus block.

Celiac plexus neurolysis is an established technique for relieving pain in cancers of the upper abdomen. This article reviews the novel technique of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided neurolytic celiac plexus block. This recently described procedure is a therapeutic extension of curvilinear array endosonographic fine needle aspiration. The indications, patient preparation, and technical aspects of the procedure are described in detail. The potential complications are mentioned and the results of the published studies are reviewed. We believe that where the expertise is available, this procedure can be integrated into the diagnostic EUS of patients with inoperable upper abdominal malignancy. As such, this would be the safest and most cost-effective approach for celiac plexus neurolysis in these patients. The role of EUS-guided celiac plexus block in patients with chronic pancreatitis may be emerging and needs further study.

Celiac Plexus↗
PubMed2000

MRI-guided celiac plexus block.

Celiac plexus block is used as a palliative procedure in cases of severe upper abdominal pain caused by pancreatitis or tumors of the pancreas. It can be guided by bony landmarks, fluoroscopy, ultrasound (US), or computed tomography (CT). To avoid severe complications, methods visualizing soft tissue, like CT and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, are preferable. We describe celiac plexus blocks carried out in an open MR scanner, offering needle guidance with an optical tracking system and near real-time image acquisition. Eight patients with severe chronic abdominal pain were included. In these, 14 celiac blocks were carried out. Good or total pain relief was achieved in 8 of the 14 blocks (57%), a moderate effect in 5 blocks (36%), and no effect in 1 block (7%). The placement of the needle was easily guided with MR in all cases. The MR technique ensures good visualization of soft tissue, direct monitoring of needle movement and avoids exposure to ionizing radiation. Celiac plexus block can safely be carried out in an open MR scanner.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2001

A prospective study of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer pain.

BACKGROUND: Celiac plexus neurolysis, a chemical splanchnicectomy of the celiac plexus, is used to treat pain caused by pancreatic cancer. Most commonly, celiac plexus neurolysis is performed percutaneously under CT or fluoroscopic guidance, but can also be performed with EUS. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the efficacy of EUS celiac plexus neurolysis in the management of pain caused by pancreatic cancer. METHODS: In this prospective study conducted in a community-based referral hospital, 58 patients with painful and inoperable pancreatic cancer were evaluated at 8 observation points before and after EUS celiac plexus neurolysis for up to 6 months. The following data were collected: age, gender, tumor location, vascular invasion, adjuvant therapy, and laboratory tests including prothrombin time, and complete blood counts were obtained at baseline (before EUS celiac plexus neurolysis); pain scores, morphine use, and adjuvant therapy were assessed at each observation. RESULTS: Pain scores were lower (p = 0.0001) 2 weeks after EUS celiac plexus neurolysis, an effect that was sustained for 24 weeks when adjusted for morphine use and adjuvant therapy. Forty-five of the 58 patients (78%) experienced a decline in pain scores after EUS celiac plexus neurolysis. Chemotherapy with and without radiation also decreased pain after EUS celiac plexus neurolysis (p = 0.002). Procedure-related transient abdominal pain was noted in 5 patients; there were no major complications. CONCLUSIONS: EUS celiac plexus neurolysis is safe and controls pain caused by unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Arteriovenous differences of blood alcohol concentrations after celiac plexus block.

After a celiac plexus block with ethyl alcohol, patients sometimes complain of symptoms of alcohol intoxication. We studied the consecutive changes of arterial and venous blood alcohol concentrations in 11 patients and investigated whether an arteriovenous difference exists. We performed a celiac plexus block with 10 ml absolute ethyl alcohol. The sampling sites were radial artery and internal jugular vein. Blood samples were collected at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 and 480 minutes after the block. The maximum level was reached 15 minutes after injection in both arterial and venous blood, 29.9 +/- 19.4 and 27.7 +/- 21.8 mg/dl (means +/- SD), respectively. Arteriovenous differences were observed 5 and 10 minutes after ethyl alcohol injection (p less than 0.01). There was a significant negative correlation between the ratio of arteriovenous differences to venous sampling and the time elapsed after the block (r = 0.41, p less than 0.01).

Arm↗
PubMed1989

Monitoring of celiac plexus block in chronic pancreatitis.

Pharmacological, percutaneous celiac plexus blockade is often inefficient in the treatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis. Lack of efficiency could be due to incomplete denervation of the plexus; however, a method for measuring the completeness of celiac plexus blockade is not yet available. We have, therefore, monitored the physiological completeness of pharmacological percutaneous celiac blockade with 40 ml 25% ethanol by measuring the effect of posture on heart rate, blood pressure, hepato-splanchnic vascular resistance, and pancreatic hormone concentrations before and after celiac plexus block in 6 patients with chronic pancreatitis. Blood pressure decreased and heart rate increased after the block (P less than 0.025), whereas no significant change was found in hepato-splanchnic vascular resistance nor in the change of these parameters during transition from the supine to standing position. Pancreatic hormones (C-peptide, free insulin, glucagon, pancreatic polypeptide and somatostatin) did not change in response to standing, either before or after the block. The cardiovascular variables were normalized the day after the block, and all the patients were in their habitual state regarding pain after 1 week. In conclusion, pancreatic hormone concentrations in response to standing are not useful for monitoring celiac plexus block, whereas heart rate, blood pressure and hepato-splanchnic blood flow may yield useful information. From such measurements it was concluded that permanent denervation of the celiac plexus was not achieved in our patients after injection of 40 ml 25% ethanol.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed2003

[Splenic necrosis after percutaneous celiac plexus block guided by ultrasonography].

Celiac plexus block guided by ultrasonography is an efficient technique for treatment of pain due to solar syndrome. Neurological complication of this therapeutic method can be avoided using an anterior route. We report the occurrence of splenic necrosis after celiac plexus block, which represents an exceptional complication of the therapeutic procedure.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2002

Neurolytic celiac plexus block for visceral abdominal malignancy: is prior diagnostic block warranted?

Neurolytic celiac plexus block is a recognised treatment for visceral abdominal pain due to malignancy. The need for a diagnostic celiac plexus block prior to neurolytic blockade is of questionable value, as it may not predict a positive response and may incorrectly predict a lack of response. Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic celiac plexus block. The records of 59 patients treated with celiac plexus block during 1994-2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnostic block was performed on 32 patients prior to the decision for subsequent neurolytic block (Group 1). Another 27 patients were directly treated with a neurolytic celiac plexus block (Group 2). Response of Group 1 to diagnostic and neurolytic blocks was compared. Data from Group 2 was used to project the response of Group 1 should those patients with negative response to diagnostic block proceeded to neurolytic block. A two-by-two table was then constructed. The diagnostic celiac plexus block predicted a positive response with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 37%. The positive predictive value was 85% and the negative predictive value was 58%. The estimated "number needed to test" before a "true" nonrespondent to lytic block to be detected was 16.7. Therefore, a positive response to diagnostic block correlates positively with neurolytic celiac plexus block for abdominal visceral pain due to malignancy. However, diagnostic block is a poor predictor when the response is negative. Hence, its clinical role is questionable and may not be warranted for patients with terminal malignancy.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Celiac plexus block: a reappraisal.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The neurolytic celiac plexus block is an established, well-developed procedure and the most widely applicable of all the neurolytic pain blocks. It optimizes palliative treatment for cancer of the upper abdominal viscera. Several techniques have been proposed in an attempt to increase success rates, reduce morbidity, and enhance technical accuracy. However, the assessment of the results and effectiveness of the block have been controversial. METHODS: A survey was made of pertinent English language literature on the anatomic and technical problems, indications, advantages, complications, and outcomes related to the neurolytic celiac plexus block as well as the neurolytic solutions and radiologic guidance used. RESULTS: The successful relief of the pain of pancreatic cancer and other abdominal malignancies can be expected in 85% and 73% of patients, respectively. Following the block, many patients can be weaned from opioids or at least have their dose reduced. The half-life of the celiac plexus block seems to be more than 4 weeks. The probability of patients remaining completely pain-free diminishes with increases survival time. The technique selected should be appropriate to the available and the extent of malignancy, since the analgesic results seem to be independent of the principal techniques used. Serious complications are extremely rare. However, critical analysis revealed major deficiencies in all of the reports reviewed. CONCLUSION: Neurolytic celiac plexus block alone is capable of providing complete pain relief until death in a few cases and, therefore, should be considered as an adjuvant treatment in the analgesic strategy. Combination palliative therapy is necessary in most cases. Failure of the block may be attributed to tumor metastasizing beyond the nerves that conduct pain via the celiac plexus and the component nerves that form it. Concomitant pain of somatic origin (frequently observed in upper gastrointestinal cancer because of significant peritoneal involvement) requires other therapeutic measures.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

[Left splanchicectomy with videothoracoscopy for the control of pain in cancer of the esophagogastric union with invasion of the celiac plexus].

Blockade of the celiac plexus and the splanchnic nerves to combat abdominal pain can be achieved by percutaneous injection of local anesthetics or alcohol, or by thoracotomy. We describe the technique for performing splanchnicectomy with video-thoracoscopy in palliative surgery for cancer of the esophagogastric union, discussing the excellent results obtained immediately in 2 patients.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Abdominal pain and alcohol celiac plexus nerve block.

Alcohol celiac plexus nerve blocks were done in 100 patients, of whome 97 had intractable abdominal pain from cancer. In most cases, an initial diagnositc block with bupivacaine was followed by the therapeutic block performed by injecting 50 ml of 50 percent ethyl alcohol. Good to excellent pain relief occurred in 94 percent of patients. Fourteen blocks were repeated for recurrent pain. Life duration ranged from 2 days to 14 months after the block. Complications and side effects were infrequently seen but did include a 10 percent incidence of postural hypotension and 1 case of partial leg paralysis. This block is remarkably safe as well as effective and should be employed more frequently.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1999

A prospective randomized comparison of endoscopic ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided celiac plexus block for managing chronic pancreatitis pain.

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography (CT)-guided celiac plexus neurolysis has been used for controlling the chronic abdominal pain associated with intra-abdominal malignancy and chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided celiac plexus neurolysis has been reported to have some success in controlling pain from pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of EUS-guided celiac plexus block versus CT-guided celiac plexus block for controlling the chronic abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: Patients enrolled were randomly assigned to EUS-guided or CT-guided celiac plexus block. Pain scores were determined pre- and postceliac block for both techniques. Follow-up was obtained by a nurse at 1 day post-block, then weekly thereafter for 24 wk. Patients also rated overall experience with these procedures. The EUS celiac block was performed with a 22-gauge sterile needle inserted into the celiac region with guidance of real-time linear array endosonography followed by injection of 10 ml of bupivacaine (0.75%) and 3 ml (40 mg) of triamcinolone on both sides of the celiac area. RESULTS: Twenty-two consecutive patients (10 men, 12 women), were ultimately enrolled in this study between 7/1/95 and 12/30/95; four patients were excluded for protocol violations. We performed EUS-guided celiac block in 10 patients and CT-guided celiac block in eight. A significant improvement in pain scores with reduction in pain medication usage occurred in 50% (five of 10) of patients having the EUS block. The mean postprocedure follow-up was 15 weeks (range: 8-24 wk). Persistent benefit was experienced by 40% of patients at 8 wk and by 30% at 24 wk. In the patients with CT block, however, only 25% (two of eight) had relief. The mean follow-up was 4 wk (range: 2-6 wk). Only 12% (one of eight) had some relief at 12 wk of follow-up. There were no complications. EUS-guided celiac block was the preferred technique among patients who experienced both techniques. A cost comparison between both celiac block techniques shows EUS to be less costly than CT. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided celiac block provided more persistent pain relief than CT-guided block and was the preferred technique among the subjects studied. EUS-guided celiac block appears to be a safe, effective, and less costly method for controlling the abdominal pain that can accompany chronic pancreatitis in some patients.

Abdominal Pain↗