Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CDI epidemiology”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Genome-sequencing-based benchmarking of antimicrobial resistance, treatment outcomes and healthcare transmission events for Clostridioides difficile infection in Australian hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a priority for infection prevention and control in health care, particularly with the emergence of hypervirulent strains and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). AIM: To characterize the genomic epidemiology and AMR profiles of culture-confirmed CDI cases within tertiary hospitals in Australia. METHODS: A total of 155 C. difficile isolates from 142 patients with CDI diagnosed in four hospitals between 2023 and 2025 were studied. Data collected included patient demographics, severity of infection, antibiotic treatment and clinical outcomes at 8 weeks. Phenotypic susceptibility to vancomycin, fidaxomicin, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, meropenem, tetracycline and rifaximin were determined by agar dilution. Isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for genotyping and resistome assessment. FINDINGS: WGS differentiated 39 distinct sequence types among CDI isolates across different healthcare services. In total, 100 isolates were singletons and 55 (35% clustering rate) isolates were considered to be genomically related (difference of two or fewer single-nucleotide polymorphisms). Of these, 12 patients (8.5%) with close hospital contact formed six epidemiologically linked clusters. Phenotypic susceptibility results were obtained for 134 (86.4%) CDI isolates. There was no phenotypic resistance to vancomycin [minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of isolates (MIC90) 1 mg/L], metronidazole (MIC90 0.5 mg/L) or fidaxomicin (MIC90 0.5 mg/L). There was no association in the study cohort between the presence of resistance genes or reduced phenotypic susceptibility and CDI recurrence. CONCLUSION: Genomic analysis of C. difficile isolates did not identify any outbreaks or an association between the sequence type or presence of a resistance gene and clinical outcomes. High-resolution characterization and identification of antibiotic resistance, CDI clinical relapse and recent transmission offered by genome sequencing can provide important benchmarks for hospital infection control.

Antibiotic resistance

Clostridium difficile Infections after Blunt Trauma: A Different Patient Population?

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated infection (CDI) has changed, and it is evident that susceptibility is related not only to exposures and bacterial potency, but host factors as well. Several small studies have suggested that CDI after trauma is associated with a different patient phenotype. The purpose of this study was to examine and describe the epidemiologic factors associated with C. difficile in blunt trauma patients without traumatic brain injury using the Trauma-Related Database as a part of the "Inflammation and Host Response to Injury" (Glue Grant) and the University of Florida Integrated Data Repository. METHODS: Previously recorded baseline characteristics, clinical data, and outcomes were compared between groups (67 C. difficile and 384 uncomplicated, 813 intermediate, and 761 complicated non-C. difficile patients) as defined by the Glue Grant on admission and at days seven and 14. RESULTS: The majority of CDI patients experienced complicated or intermediate clinical courses. The mean ages of all cohorts were less than 65 y and CDI patients were significantly older than uncomplicated patients without CDI. The CDI patients had increased days in the hospital and on the ventilator, as well as significantly higher new injury severity scores (NISS), and a greater percentage of patients with NISS >34 points compared with non-CDI patients. They also had greater Marshall and Denver multiple organ dysfunction scores than non-CDI uncomplicated patients, and greater creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, neutrophil count, lactic acid, and PiO2:FiO2 compared with all non-CDI cohorts on admission. In addition, the CDI patients had higher glucose concentrations and base deficit from uncomplicated patients and greater leukocytosis than complicated patients on admission. Several of these changes persisted to days seven and 14. CONCLUSION: Analysis of severe blunt trauma patients with C. difficile, as compared with non-CDI patients, reveals evidence of increased inflammation, immunosuppression, worse acute kidney injury, higher NISS, greater days in the hospital and on the ventilator, higher organ injury scores, and prolonged clinical courses. This supports reports of an increased prevalence of CDI in a younger population not believed previously to be at risk. This unique population may have specific genomic or inflammation-related risk factors that may play more important roles in disease susceptibility. Prospective analysis may allow early identification of at-risk patients, creation of novel therapeutics, and improved understanding of how and why C. difficile colonization transforms into infection after severe blunt trauma.

Adolescent