SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CCNA2”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2025

Investigating the molecular mechanisms, drug prediction, and validation of CCNA2 and MAD2L1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on bioinformatics.

OBJECTIVE: Aims to comprehensively investigate the expression patterns of CCNA2 and MAD2L1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using bioinformatics methods. METHODS: Based on WGCNA analysis of gene mutation expression, methylation level distribution, mRNA expression and ESCC-related genes in public databases, were employed for investigating potential biomarkers for prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC).Finally,. performing qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry to validate. RESULTS: Ultimately identified 4 hub genes: CDK1, CCNA2,TOP2A and MAD2L1. Bioinformatics analysis showed high expression of these four genes in ESCC (P < 0.05). CCNA2 and MAD2L1 were selected for subsequent analysis based on literature.3.Single gene enrichment analysis revealed significant enrichment of CCNA2 and MAD2L1 in pathways related to splicing, bladder cancer, non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination, glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis chondroitin sulfate, progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation and mismatch repair. PASTAA database indicated the involvement of transcription factors such as Roralpha1, Pou6f1, Roralpha2, Atf-1, Pax-3, C/ebpalpha, Nkx2-1 in the regulation of CCNA2, while no transcription factors were predicted for MAD2L1..Immune infiltration analysis revealed a close association between ESCC and plasma cells, CD8 + T cells, monocytes, M0 macrophages, M1 macrophages, dendritic cells, and resting mast cells.Drug prediction for CCNA2 included 7 drugs such as ETHINYL ESTRADIOL, Seliciclib and TAMOXIFEN, while no drugs were predicted for MAD2L1.qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry demonstrated high expression of CCNA2 in ESCC, while MAD2L1 showed no significant difference between ESCC and normal esophageal squamous epithelial tissues. CONCLUSION: CCNA2 and MAD2L1 may be potential biomarkers for ESCC, providing a novel basis for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying ESCC pathogenesis.Additionally, the potential drugs predicted for CCNA2 may emerge as a new hope for ESCC patients in the future.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

CCNA2 orchestrates the PI3K/AKT signaling axis to propel prostate cancer metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the most common malignancies in men, posing a persistent global burden in terms of both public health and socioeconomic costs. Although early detection is essential for improving patient outcomes, existing clinical tools, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, are hampered by suboptimal specificity and positive predictive value, resulting in frequent overdiagnosis and overtreatment of indolent lesions while missing a subset of aggressive tumors at an early stage. In this context, the rapid advancement of high-throughput omics technologies, coupled with sophisticated machine learning (ML) algorithms, provides a powerful computational framework to dissect high-dimensional genomic data, uncover latent gene expression signatures, and identify candidate biomarkers with superior discriminative performance over conventional clinicopathological parameters. Therefore, in this study, we sought to screen for crucial ML-based biomarkers associated with PCa, with a particular focus on systematically assessing the diagnostic and prognostic value of CCNA2. Leveraging large-scale transcriptomic cohorts from public repositories, we employed an ensemble of ML approaches to prioritize candidate genes and subsequently evaluated the diagnostic performance of CCNA2 through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, as well as its prognostic utility via Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. Our findings are anticipated to elucidate the molecular landscape of PCa and offer a promising biomarker candidate for early detection and risk stratification. METHODS: This study integrated single-cell RNA sequencing, bulk transcriptomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repositories, immunofluorescence, and multiple ML algorithms with in vitro functional assays to evaluate CCNA2 expression, clinical relevance, and biological behavior in PCa. RESULTS: CCNA2 was linked to metastasis and poor prognosis. High CCNA2 expression significantly correlated with adverse survival outcomes, and knockdown of CCNA2 suppressed proliferation, migration, and invasion in PCa cell lines. Mechanistically, CCNA2 modulated the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. An ML-based diagnostic model incorporating CCNA2 demonstrated high predictive accuracy across multiple validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: CCNA2 serves as a promising prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in prostate adenocarcinoma, driving tumor progression potentially via the PI3K/AKT axis.

CCNA2↗

PubMed2026

Exploring the mechanism of Shengmai San in treating lung adenocarcinoma based on bioinformatics and molecular dynamics simulation.

To investigate the mechanism of Shengmai San (SMS) in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) based on an integrated strategy combining "network pharmacology, bioinformatics, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation," aiming to provide a precise combination therapy strategy and identify potential bioactive compounds. Differentially expressed genes in LUAD were identified from the Gene Expression Omnibus database using R (originally developed at Bell Laboratories and currently managed by Lucent Technologies). SMS components (ginseng, Ophiopogon japonicus, and Schisandra chinensis) were retrieved from encyclopaedia of traditional Chinese medicine, with Lipinski-compliant compounds selected. Compound targets were predicted via SwissTargetPrediction and Similarity Ensemble Approach. Intersecting targets between differentially expressed genes and compound targets were identified for "herbs-compounds-targets-disease" network construction. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analyses were performed. Hub targets were identified by analyzing the protein-protein interaction network. High-prognostic relevance targets were screened from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Compounds targeting these were identified through the herbs-compounds-targets-disease network, and absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity-compliant compounds were selected using SwissADME (a web-based tool provided by the Molecular Modeling Group of the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics). Core regulatory targets were identified through molecular docking, with complex stability assessed by molecular dynamics simulations. The key bioactive compounds of SMS for treating LUAD were identified as 7-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one, N-trans-feruloyltyramine, paprazine, and (E)-N-[(2S)-2-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)prop-2-enamide. Hub targets included AURKA, CCNA2, CCNB1, CDK1, CHEK1, KIF11, NEK2, PLK1, TTK, and TYMS. Among these, CDK1, CHEK1, and PLK1 demonstrated both high-prognostic relevance and strong binding affinity with SMS, emerging as core regulatory targets for SMS in LUAD treatment. Mechanistically, SMS exerts its anticancer effects primarily by modulating the tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-17, cell cycle, and Lipid and atherosclerosis signaling pathways. The active components of SMS, such as paprazine, may exert antitumor effects partly through downregulating CDK1, CHEK1, and PLK1 expression. Although the present study did not examine drug-resistance models or combination regimens, our findings raise the possibility that, in patients with high expression of these genes, combining SMS with standard chemotherapy or targeted therapy could potentially enhance chemosensitivity and mitigate the development of resistance. This hypothesis, however, requires formal testing in appropriate preclinical models and functional validation studies.

Molecular Dynamics Simulation↗

PubMed2026

Identification of Critical Genes Related to Breast Cancer with Brain Metastasis Through Bioinformatics Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Distant metastasis accounts for the majority of Breast Cancer (BC)-related mortality. The brain is one of the most common regions of metastasis. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain uncertain. METHODS: In this study, gene expression profiles were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Datasets GSE100534 and GSE52604, containing 16 primary brain tumor samples and 38 breast cancer brain metastasis samples, were used to identify the Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs). The Metascape database was used to analyze enriched Gene Ontology (GO) entries and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway entries in DEGs. The STRING database was then used to construct a Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network, and the Cytoscape platform was employed to visualize the network. Furthermore, the Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyze the Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) among the hub genes. Finally, the iRegulon plugin was used to construct a regulatory network to find the transcription factors (TFs) that regulate the expression of the hub genes. RESULTS: A total of 344 DEGs, including 182 up-regulated and 162 down-regulated genes, were identified by using the limma package in R. A module with 18 nodes and 9 hub genes was selected from the PPI network by using the plugins MCODE and Cyto- Hubba, respectively. KEGG pathway analysis demonstrated that brain metastasis in BC was closely related to the oocyte cell cycle. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that high expression of these 9 hub genes was associated with poor RFS in BC patients. TFs' analysis showed that E2F4, SIN3A, FOXM1, and TFDP1 interacted with these hub genes. DISCUSSION: This study revealed that Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis (BCBM) may have a promoting effect on the cell cycle of oocytes and affect the maturation and division of oocytes through the KEGG and GO analyses of 344 DEGs. The selected 9 hub genes (ASPM, BUB1, BUB1B, CCNA2, CCNB1, CDK1, NDC80, NCAPG, and TOP2A) and 4 transcription factors (E2F4, SIN3A, FOXM1, TFDP1) may play a critical role in brain metastasis of BC. CONCLUSION: The results of this study may aid in the early diagnosis and suggest potential targets for the treatment of BCBM.

Brain Neoplasms↗