Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Brazil”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other circulating lipids in Brazil: a systematic literature review.

Accurate laboratory assessment of circulating lipids underpins cardiovascular risk stratification, yet clinical interpretation depends not only on the assays but on the formula chosen to estimate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). This review integrates the 2019-2025 evidence on laboratory methods for triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), and on the formulas estimating LDL-C, VLDL-C, and non-HDL cholesterol, to determine how these should be measured, reported, and harmonized in Brazil, where lipid thresholds are adapted from international consensus. A PRISMA 2020 systematic search (PROSPERO CRD420251241064) of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, SciELO, LILACS, Web of Science, and Embase retrieved 57,915 records; after removing 38,210 duplicates, 19,705 titles/abstracts were screened, 312 full texts assessed, and 25 sources included. Enzymatic colorimetric assays remain standard for TG, TC, and HDLC. For LDL-C, Martin/Hopkins classifies more accurately than Friedewald (89.6% vs 83.2% correct categorization in 5,051,467 patients), particularly at high TG and low LDL-C, while Sampson/NIH and modified Sampson/NIH extend reliable estimation into hypertriglyceridemia and very low LDL-C; direct measurement is reserved for TG beyond the validated range. Although the review centers on the Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins, and Sampson/NIH families that dominate guideline practice, other published equations exist and are addressed in context. In Brazil, atherogenic-lipid thresholds are risk-based decision limits rather than reference intervals; national surveys describe lipid distributions but were not designed to establish them. Analytical standardization through traceability programs, multicenter validation of formulas, and-where the distribution-based construct applies (HDLC, pediatrics)-nationally derived reference intervals are priorities for equitable cardiovascular risk assessment in Brazil.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage care in a middle-income public healthcare system: A real-world neurocritical care cohort.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although aneurysm treatment capacity has expanded worldwide, outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remain strongly influenced by neurocritical care (NCC) delivery, referral pathways, and access to specialized treatment. Contemporary data describing real-world aSAH care in resource-limited healthcare systems remain scarce. We aimed to characterize treatment patterns, NCC delivery, complications, and outcomes in a large Brazilian public referral center. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive adults with confirmed aSAH admitted between June 2018 and March 2022 to a high-volume Brazilian tertiary referral center. Only patients admitted within five days of symptom onset were included. Demographic, clinical, radiological, treatment, complication, and outcome data were extracted from institutional records. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 3-month functional outcome assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included. Disease severity was high, with 45% presenting WFNS grades 4-5, 73% modified Fisher grade 4 hemorrhage, and 64% hydrocephalus. Endovascular treatment was performed in 73% of cases, and median time from admission to aneurysm treatment was 1 day. Despite early treatment capability, only 28% of patients were admitted to an ICU within 48 h, while 38% never received ICU care. Delayed cerebral ischemia occurred in 43%, radiologic vasospasm in 58%, ventriculitis in 22%, and infectious complications in 57%. External ventricular drainage was required in 42%, and vasoactive drugs were used in 85%. In-hospital mortality was 42%, and 66% had unfavorable 3-month outcomes (mRS 4-6). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world cohort highlights the substantial neurocritical care burden of aSAH in a middle-income public healthcare system. Despite timely access to definitive aneurysm treatment, patients experienced frequent neurological and systemic complications, emphasizing that contemporary aSAH care extends well beyond aneurysm occlusion.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Rationale, design, and experiences from the vanguard phase of the bariatric surgery for the reduction of cardiovascular events (BRAVE) trial.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest that metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) reduces mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with obesity, but adequately powered randomized trials (RCTs) are lacking. The Bariatric Surgery for the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events (BRAVE) trial was designed to address this evidence gap. METHODS: BRAVE is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, open-label RCT with blinded endpoint adjudication comparing MBS vs guideline-based medical weight management (MWM) in adults with obesity and high-risk cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eligible participants have a body-mass index ≥35 kg/m² or ≥30 kg/m² with type 2 diabetes or age >55 years, and prior myocardial infarction (MI), coronary intervention, heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF) with elevated CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral arterial disease. Participants are randomized 1:1 to MBS (sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or duodenal switch) or MWM, which includes dietary, behavioral, and pharmacologic therapies. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke, HF events, coronary revascularization, AF hospitalization, and renal events. A vanguard phase of 200 participants was implemented to optimize recruitment and logistics. RESULTS: As of October 2025, 2,514 individuals have been screened from 17 centers in Canada, Brazil, Italy and Spain, with 444 entered MBS work-up, and 200 have been randomized. The randomized cohort (mean age 59.8 years; 37% female; mean BMI 44.0 kg m⁻²) has high burden of hypertension (82%), diabetes (45%), coronary artery disease (44%), HF (39%), and AF (48%). Recruitment barriers were identified and addressed through targeted education and enhanced patient engagement. CONCLUSIONS: BRAVE is the first large RCT evaluating whether MBS safely reduces major cardiovascular events compared with medical therapy in high-risk patients with obesity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05531474.

Humans↗