Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Blind integrity”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

746 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Blinding integrity in psychedelic research: Evidence from a comparative randomized controlled trial of psilocybin, MDMA, and methylphenidate in healthy volunteers.

Maintaining effective blinding is a major methodological challenge in psychedelic research. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of blinding integrity in 120 healthy volunteers who received either psilocybin, MDMA, or methylphenidate (active placebo) in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Using a multi-level assessment incorporating forced-choice substance guesses, certainty ratings, decision factors, and subjective substance effects, the analyses characterize blinding integrity and its relation to the substance experience. Results indicate that overall blinding was insufficient, with psilocybin showing the highest rates of functional unblinding, MDMA moderate levels, and methylphenidate the lowest. As an active placebo, methylphenidate provided more effective blinding for MDMA than for psilocybin. Incorporating certainty levels of substance guesses revealed a more differentiated pattern, with lower functional unblinding rates. Decision factors and subjective substance experiences were associated with phenomenological substance effects. Prior substance experiences did not influence accuracy of forced-choice substance guesses. These findings provide empirical guidance for the design and reporting of blinding procedures in psychedelic trials and underscore the value of systematic, multi-level assessment of blinding integrity.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Redefining the real problem in psychedelic trials: Why fighting the Lessebo matters more than blinding integrity.

Imperfect blinding is not specific to psychedelic trials. In randomized trials, treatment allocation is frequently correctly guessed, yet blinding integrity is rarely assessed outside of psychedelic research and is generally not considered a barrier in regulatory evaluation. The intense debate in psychedelics may reflect a broader double standard affecting mental health research, when uncertainties arising from imperfect blinding are confounded by those linked to patient-reported outcome measures. Indeed, people living with mental disorders are often viewed as unreliable reporters, despite well-documented limitations of clinician-rated scales and the absence of robust biological markers of symptomatic change. Importantly, it is the maintenance of reasonable doubt of treatment allocation that sustains internal validity and ethical feasibility of placebo-controlled designs, rather than perfect blinding. Concerns about expectancy bias in psychedelic trials are closely tied to blinding debates. When allocation is inferred, expectations may cluster in the arm perceived as active or in stereotyped experiences and influence outcomes differently in active and control arms, leading to a risk of lessebo, a negative placebo effect due to the negative expectation related to receiving a placebo. However, we argue that an underrecognized mechanism of lessebo is disappointment. This risk may reflect insufficient clinical management of disappointment rather than pre-treatment expectation alone. We therefore propose shifting the emphasis from preserving inevitably imperfect blinding towards mitigating disappointment in both arms. Establishing non-stereotyped expectations prior to treatment through structured psychoeducation, strengthened therapeutic alliance, and realistic preparation would help avoid lessebo effects. Such strategies would enhance ethical rigor, interpretability, and the clinical usefulness of psychedelic trials.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib Combined With Jintiange Capsules for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) poses a substantial global health burden, and conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy with celecoxib is hindered by adverse effects. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining celecoxib with Jintiange capsules, a synthetic tiger bone formulation used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), to manage symptomatic KOA. MATERIAL AND METHODS This 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 120 patients with KOA (age &#xf0b3;40 years; visual analog scale [VAS] score 4-7). Participants received celecoxib (200 mg/day tapered to 100 mg/day) combined with either Jintiange capsules (3.6 g/day) or placebo. The primary outcome was the change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score. Secondary outcomes included WOMAC subscale scores (pain, function, and stiffness), VAS scores, and adverse drug reaction reports. RESULTS The experimental group demonstrated a 23.5-point (37.8%) reduction in WOMAC total score from baseline (P<0.001); the control group showed a 13.2-point (21.6%) reduction (P<0.001). The experimental group achieved 51.6% improvement in the WOMAC pain subscale (P<0.001), whereas the control group showed 33.3% improvement (P<0.001). Relative to the control group, the experimental group demonstrated a greater reduction in VAS score (P<0.001). Combined TCM-NSAID therapy produced significantly greater pain relief and functional improvement than NSAID monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Celecoxib combined with Jintiange capsules provided clinically meaningful improvements in pain relief and functional outcomes relative to celecoxib monotherapy in patients with KOA. These findings support integration of TCM with conventional pharmacotherapy for osteoarthritis management.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Blue light therapy delivered through light glasses improves sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in Parkinson's disease: A randomized trial.

BackgroundSleep disturbances, including excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and fragmented nocturnal sleep, are common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and significantly reduce quality of life. This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of a novel approach using blue light, delivered via dedicated glasses with integrated LED lights, to improve sleep and non-motor symptoms.MethodsRandomised, placebo-controlled, single-blind pilot study with a 2-week light intervention. Participants were assessed at baseline, two weeks, and five weeks. The study was designed to evaluate between- and within-group changes. Participants were randomly allocated to receive blue light therapy (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;15) or red light placebo (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;15), delivered via LED-integrated glasses for one hour, twice daily, given for a 2-week period. Primary outcome was improvement in sleep quality, assessed via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Secondary outcomes included diary-based sleep outcomes, excessive daytime sleepiness, mood, anxiety, and motor symptoms.ResultsThere was a significant group&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;time effect with blue light therapy leading to better Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.021). Between-group analyses showed that at two weeks a trend toward significance was observed (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.065), while sleep quality significantly improved at five weeks compared to placebo (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.029) with a large effect size (0.896). Excessive sleepiness improved in the blue light group (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), with a reduction in clinically relevant sleepiness from 50.0% to 6.7% (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.005).ConclusionsBlue light therapy delivered through dedicated glasses appeared to show an improvement in sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in individuals with PD. Blue light therapy offers a promising alternative to traditional light therapy utilising lower light intensities and eliminating the need for light boxes.

Aged↗
PubMed2026

Impact of a CARE-ORIENT Education Program on Oral Hygiene Among Institutionalized Older Adults: A Double Blinded Cluster Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Older adults residing in long-term care facilities often depend on caregivers for daily oral care. Inadequate caregiver training may contribute to poor plaque control and denture hygiene. METHODS: A six-month parallel-arm cluster randomized controlled study was conducted in selected long-term care facilities in Northern India. Two old age homes were randomly selected, with one allocated to the intervention group and the other to the control group. A total of 150 older adults and 46 caregivers participated. Caregivers in the intervention group received a structured caregiver oriented oral health education. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Outcomes included Debris Index, Turesky-Gilmore-Glickman Plaque Index, Denture Plaque Index and Denture Stomatitis Index. Caregiver knowledge and practice were evaluated using a validated questionnaire. RESULTS: Caregiver knowledge and practice scores improved significantly in the intervention group at 3 and 6 months. Significant differences were observed in Debris Index (DI), Plaque Index (PI), and Denture Plaque Index (DPI) in the intervention group over the six-month follow-up (p < 0.001). The Debris Index decreased from 2.76 &#xb1; 0.07 at baseline to 1.54 &#xb1; 0.05 at 6 months. Plaque Index scores declined from 3.26 &#xb1; 0.06 to 1.85 &#xb1; 0.08, and Denture Plaque Index scores reduced from 3.22 &#xb1; 0.03 to 1.74 &#xb1; 0.05. Denture Stomatitis Index improved over time; however, intergroup differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Structured caregiver-focused oral health education significantly improved oral hygiene among institutionalized older adults over six months, supporting integration of caregiver training within routine long-term care.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

A bimodal large language model reduces misalignment in patient education: A double-blinded randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective patient education requires accurate communication aligned with patients' emotional and semantical needs. Text-based large language models (LLMs) lack access to non-verbal cues, which may contribute to misaligned responses. METHODS: We evaluated emotional and semantic misalignment in a text-based LLM using 64,200 utterances from 16,583 patient education cases across six departments and three centers. Dolphin was developed integrating text and audio cues and evaluated through emotion recognition, semantic consistency assessment, branch-level ablations, and a double-blinded randomized trial against a matched text-based LLM comparator (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: (ChiCTR2500095933). FINDINGS: The text-based LLM showed emotional misalignment in 36.7% of responses and semantic misalignment in 28.3% of cases, with higher misalignment under greater burden. Dolphin outperformed the text-based LLM in emotion recognition accuracy (0.886 vs. 0.713) and semantic consistency (84.9% vs. 82.1%; both adjusted p < 0.001). Ablations supported contribution of audio branches. Dolphin received higher expert ratings than the text-based LLM and human educators (all p < 0.001). In 555 patients, Dolphin was associated with greater patient satisfaction (98.6% vs. 93.8%), suggestion acceptance (76.1% vs. 58.9%; p < 0.001), proactive disclosure (44.6% vs. 26.5%; p < 0.001), and fewer 7-day unplanned recontact (12.9% vs. 22.9%; p = 0.002). No unsafe recommendations or safety events were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with text-based LLM, Dolphin improved emotional-semantic alignment and patient-education outcomes, supporting bimodal alignment as a strategy for reducing misalignment-driven communication failures. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China, State Key Laboratory Special Fund, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Clinical performance evaluation of single-shade versus multi-shade composite resins in non-carious cervical lesions: a 36-month randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Composite resins are widely used as the material of choice for definitive restorations due to their ability to integrate functional and aesthetic aspects in dental rehabilitation. Recently, one-shade composite resins have been introduced to simplify the clinical workflow. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of a "chameleon effect" composite resin with that of a multi-shade composite resin in non-carious cervical lesions after 36 months of follow-up. METHODS: This study was a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with an equivalence design using a split-mouth approach. The sample consisted of 60 patients presenting at least two non-carious cervical lesions, totaling 120 restorations. Restorations were performed using two materials from the same commercial brand: Vittra Unique (one-shade group) and Vittra APS (multi-shade group). The clinical performance of the restorations was longitudinally evaluated according to the FDI criteria. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, while other clinical parameters were compared using the chi-square test (&#x3b1; = 0.05). RESULTS: At baseline, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the evaluated biological, functional, and aesthetic parameters (p > 0.05). Both materials demonstrated clinically acceptable performance according to the FDI criteria, with no significant differences between them. CONCLUSIONS: After 36 months, no significant differences were observed between the one-shade and the multi-shade composite resins in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This 36-month randomized clinical trial demonstrates that single-shade composite resins achieve structural durability and aesthetic integration equivalent to traditional multi-shade layering when restoring non-carious cervical lesions. This evidence validates a simplified, single-shade restorative workflow, significantly reducing chairside time and operator-dependent variables without compromising the clinical longevity.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effects of multistrain probiotic supplementation on hepatic function and anthropometric parameters in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is increasingly prevalent on a global scale. The gut microbiota is integral to its pathogenesis, prompting extensive research into microbiota modulation as a potential adjunctive therapeutic strategy. AIM: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of multistrain probiotics supplementation on hepatic function in patients with MASLD in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. The primary outcomes were changes in Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and fatty liver index (FLI). Secondary outcomes included changes in anthropometric parameters, selected biochemical markers, and other liver-related indices. METHODS: A total of 64 patients with MASLD were randomly assigned to two groups receiving either placebo (C) or a probiotic mixture (PRO) containing the following bacterial strains: 50% Lactococcus lactis Rosell-1058, 25% Lacticaseibacillus casei Rosell-215, 12.5% Lactobacillus helveticus Rosell-52, 12.5% Bifidobacterium bifidum Rosell-71 for 12 wk. RESULTS: Significant group &#xd7; time interactions were observed for FIB-4 (Q = 0.007), with reduction in the PRO group and increase in the C group (-0.05 vs. 0.10; P = 0.002). No significant interaction was found for FLI (Q = 0.942). Significant group &#xd7; time interactions were also observed for aspartate aminotransferase (-2.87 vs. 1.87 U/L; Q = 0.003) and APRI (-0.03 vs. 0.02; Q = 0.001), favoring the PRO group (P < 0.001 for both). No significant changes were observed in anthropometric parameters, glucose levels, or lipid profile. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MASLD, the 12-wk probiotic supplementation had a modest but statistically significant effect on FIB-4, aspartate aminotransferase, and APRI, with no significant effect on FLI or anthropometric and metabolic parameters. These findings suggest that this probiotic formulation may have potential benefits for liver function in MASLD. However, long-term studies incorporating imaging-based and histological endpoints are required to determine the clinical significance of these findings.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Pre-clinical evaluation of the anticaries effect of an experimental Malva sylvestris extract mouthwash using a cariogenic model in situ.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial and anticariogenic potential of Malva sylvestris extract on enamel and dentin in situ. METHODS: A double-blind crossover in situ study was conducted with 12 participants wearing palatal appliances containing two bovine enamel and two dentin specimens per 3 phases, a total of 72 enamel and dentin specimens. Biofilm formation and daily sucrose exposure were allowed. Treatments were applied twice daily in three phases: Malva sylvestris (2.5%, MS); fluoride (225 ppm, F); and placebo (P). After seven days, biofilm was collected from the bovine specimens for analysis of Lactobacillus spp. and mutans streptococci by Colony Forming Unit counts (CFU log&#x2081;&#x2080;/mL). Dental demineralization of the bovine specimens was assessed by transverse microradiography (TMR). RESULTS: MS did not reduce Lactobacillus spp. counts (CFU log&#x2081;&#x2080;/mL: enamel 6.63&#xb1;0.81; dentin 6.68&#xb1;0.92) compared to P (6.63&#xb1;0.70; 6.62&#xb1;0.51). F also did not differ (6.29&#xb1;0.75; 6.32&#xb1;0.41; ANOVA/Tukey, p>0.38). Mutans streptococci data were inconclusive. In enamel, both MS (2320.8&#xb1;768.2 %vol&#xb7;&#xb5;m; 101.6&#xb1;27.0 &#xb5;m) and F (1777.3&#xb1;733.3 %vol&#xb7;&#xb5;m; 95.8&#xb1;23.5 &#xb5;m) significantly reduced integrated mineral loss and lesion depth compared to P (3517.2&#xb1;1119.9 %vol&#xb7;&#xb5;m; 138.6&#xb1;19.5 &#xb5;m; ANOVA/Tukey, p&#x2264;0.0003). In dentin, MS significantly reduced integrated mineral loss (322.5 [250-580] %vol&#xb7;&#xb5;m) and lesion depth (30.1 [15-42.2] &#xb5;m) compared to P (880 [580-1705]; 58.3 [32.2-88.6] &#xb5;m; Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn, p&#x2264;0.001), while F (587.5 [305-720]; 25.2 [16.5-38.8] &#xb5;m) did not differ significantly (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Malva sylvestris extract had no antimicrobial effect on Lactobacillus spp. counts, but significantly reduced enamel and dentin demineralization, showing anticaries effect comparable to fluoride. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Malva sylvestris has demonstrated promising biological activity. This study investigates the antimicrobial efficacy of Malva sylvestris against cariogenic microorganisms in situ. Our findings provide relevant evidence that M. sylvestris exert significant anticaries effects using an in situ model.

Biofilms↗
PubMed2026

Gut microbial diversity at baseline conditions the clinical, microbiome, and metabolic response to paraprobiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LRCC5282 in overweight adults.

The gut microbiota is increasingly recognized as a target for obesity management; however, whether baseline gut microbial diversity conditions responsiveness to microbiota-targeted interventions remains unclear. We aimed to investigate whether baseline gut microbial diversity is associated with responsiveness to a paraprobiotic derived from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LRCC5282 (LP5282-P) in overweight adults. In a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of 120 overweight adults, LP5282-P produced no significant between-group differences in any clinical outcome across the overall per-protocol population. However, in the low-diversity subgroup, LP5282-P was associated with significant reductions in body weight, body mass index, and circulating leptin levels. These clinical changes were accompanied by compositional shifts in the gut microbiota, including higher relative abundances of Christensenellaceae, Faecalibacterium, and Alistipes. Fecal metabolite profiles showed elevated acetate and butyrate concentrations and altered bile acid composition. Within the low-diversity subgroup, changes in the relative abundances of Akkermansia and Eubacterium were inversely correlated with changes in body weight, body fat mass, and leptin levels. In contrast, the high-diversity subgroup exhibited no consistent response across the outcome domains examined. Overall, baseline gut microbial diversity was associated with differential responsiveness to LP5282-P, supporting its potential use as a stratification variable in future microbiota-targeted intervention trials. Further studies integrating direct measures of microbial activity and host response are warranted to elucidate the biological pathways underlying this diversity-dependent responsiveness. Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), KCT0008119.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effectiveness of Yoga and Combined Exercise in Female With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although exercise is beneficial for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), the comparative efficacy of different modalities for patients in clinical remission remains unclear. This study compared the short- and long-term effects of yoga versus a combined exercise programme on pain, balance, mobility, fatigue, depression, and quality of life in females with RA in remission. METHODS: In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 74 female participants were allocated to yoga (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;25), combined exercise (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;25), or a usual care control group (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;24). The intervention groups underwent an 8-week supervised programme. Clinical assessments, including the Visual Analogue Scale (pain), Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go Test, Beck Depression Inventory, Fatigue Severity Scale, and Short Form-36, were conducted at baseline, post-intervention (8&#xa0;weeks), and follow-up (20&#xa0;weeks). RESULTS: Both intervention groups demonstrated significant improvements in all outcome measures compared with the control group at post-treatment and follow-up (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.05). Notably, the yoga group exhibited superior outcomes compared to the combined exercise group in reducing pain intensity (median reduction of 4.00 vs. 2.00 points; p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001, &#x3b7;2&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.724), as well as in physical function, balance, fatigue, depression, and quality of life at the 20-week follow-up. These benefits may be partly attributed to the incorporation of breathing and relaxation techniques inherent to yoga practice. CONCLUSIONS: Both 8-week yoga and combined exercise programs are effective in managing residual symptoms in females with RA in clinical remission. However, yoga appears to provide superior benefits in pain management and psychosocial well-being, supporting its integration into multidisciplinary RA management protocols, particularly for addressing psychosocial burden in patients achieving remission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered at NCT07072754 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Impact of PerioperAtive LidocAine Infusions on Enhanced Recovery After Noncardiac Surgery (IMPALA-ERAS) in an inpatient setting: rationale, design and protocol for a sequential, repeated crossover trial.

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal analgesic strategies designed to minimise perioperative opioid exposure are fundamental components of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways. Despite widespread implementation of ERAS protocols, the optimal analgesic regimen remains undefined, as the individual contributions of specific agents to overall analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing effects are not fully elucidated. Intravenous lidocaine, a widely utilised local anaesthetic, possesses both analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties and has been associated with improved gastrointestinal recovery. This study seeks to pragmatically evaluate the impact of incorporating perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion into established ERAS pathways on postoperative functional recovery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Impact of PerioperAtive LidocAine Infusions (IMPALA) on ERAS trial is a single-centre, pragmatic, cluster-randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. A total of 2290 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, emergency general surgery, urology, ventral hernia repair, surgical oncology or spine surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either intraoperative and postoperative intravenous lidocaine infusions (administered for up to 48 hours) or placebo as part of a standardised multimodal analgesic regimen integrated into established ERAS pathways. The primary outcome is case mix index-adjusted resource length of stay, defined as the time interval from surgical initiation to hospital discharge adjusted for case mix index. The primary outcome is total inpatient opioid consumption within the first 72 hours, reported in oral morphine milligram equivalents. Secondary outcomes include various in-hospital clinical endpoints derived from the electronic health record. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol and accompanying statistical analysis plan outline the study design, primary and secondary endpoints and analytic methodology. The IMPALA-ERAS trial has received ethical approval from the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board (IRB: 250617). The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national conferences. Results from this trial are expected to inform evidence-based practices regarding perioperative lidocaine infusion and its potential contributions to enhanced postoperative recovery in surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07224711.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Comparing Traditional Motor Speech Practice to Contextualized Speech Practice in Preschoolers With Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare retention of real-word targets across practice conditions (contextualized vs. motor-only) within a modified integral stimulation treatment for preschoolers with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). METHOD: A single-subject experimental design with alternating treatments was used with matched target sets randomly assigned to contextualized practice, motor-only practice, or no treatment. Three preschoolers with CAS completed 18 therapy sessions, each consisting of two 25-min blocks: one contextualized practice and one motor-only practice. Order of practice was randomized each visit. Changes in percent phonemes correct (PPC) and lexical stress accuracy, derived from blinded transcription, were explored with visual analysis and effect sizes (standardized mean difference, d statistic). RESULTS: Meaningful improvements (d > 1) were observed in PPC across words treated in contextualized practice for all three children immediately posttreatment and for two of three children at the 1-month follow-up. Meaningful improvements in the motor-only condition were observed in two of three children immediately posttreatment and at follow-up. No meaningful changes were observed in lexical stress across any conditions in any participant. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary support for the feasibility of a modified integral stimulation therapy that incorporates elements of linguistically grounded therapies (linguistic retrieval, recasts, expansions) that may facilitate target retention in some preschoolers with CAS. However, other elements should be explored in conjunction with integral stimulation to maximize clinical outcomes. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33228981.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Multi-omics panorama of glaucoma: Pathogenesis, biomarkers, and novel therapeutic strategies.

Glaucoma is a group of irreversible, blinding eye diseases characterized by progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells, leading to gradual visual field defects that severely impact patients' quality of life. Its complex pathophysiological mechanisms remain incompletely understood, limiting the development of early diagnostic and effective therapeutic strategies. Advances in omics technologies have provided new insights into elucidating the pathophysiology of glaucoma. We summarize specific alterations in genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, epigenomics, and microbiomics associated with glaucoma. We emphasize the systematic analysis of disease mechanisms, identification of clinically applicable biomarkers, and discovery of novel therapeutic targets through the integration of these data. This approach paves new pathways for glaucoma subtype diagnosis and personalized treatment, while also outlining future research directions and challenges.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Assessing the threat of Bacillus cereus: From toxin characterization to modern detection strategies.

Bacillus cereus is a spore-forming pathogen responsible for both diarrheal and emetic foodborne illnesses worldwide. Its significance in food safety has received growing attention. Recent advances, including the discovery of novel virulence factors and the development of emerging detection technologies, have provided new insights into its pathogenic mechanisms and surveillance strategies. This review critically examines the global burden of B. cereus infections, and molecular mechanisms of its major virulence factors, and the performance characteristics of current detection knowledge gaps such as the viable-but-non-culturable state and regulatory blind spots for emetic toxins, and discuss unresolved challenges in clinical management. By integrating epidemiological, microbiological, and technological perspectives with critical lens, this review aims to provide a valuable reference for future research and food safety practices.

Bacillus cereus↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Anxiety and Sleep Quality in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with breast cancer commonly experience anxiety and sleep disturbance during and after treatment, and these symptoms are closely interrelated, negatively affecting the quality of life. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been increasingly used as a nonpharmacological supportive approach. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of MBIs on anxiety and sleep quality in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Embase was conducted up to May 15, 2025. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. RESULTS: Twenty-four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 3,212 participants were analyzed. MBIs significantly reduced anxiety compared with control groups receiving usual care, no intervention, or wait-list conditions (SMD: -0.47, 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.32), whereas no significant effect was observed for sleep quality. Subgroup analysis indicated that intervention duration accounted for 55.5% of the heterogeneity in anxiety outcomes. All studies were rated as having some concerns regarding risk of bias, primarily due to self-reported outcomes and lack of blinding. Certainty of evidence was moderate for anxiety and low for sleep quality. DISCUSSION: MBIs appear to be effective in reducing anxiety among patients with breast cancer; however, no significant effect was observed for sleep quality. All included studies were rated as having some concerns regarding risk of bias, and the limited reporting of adverse events represents a limitation of the evidence. In addition, substantial heterogeneity in sleep quality outcomes and the limited number of included RCTs restrict exploration of heterogeneity sources and limit generalizability. Further high-quality well-designed RCTs are needed to strengthen and confirm the evidence.

Female↗
PubMed2026

A Sentiment-Based Comparison of AI- and Physician-Generated Empathic Statements in Palliative Care.

CONTEXT: Empathic communication promotes trust in patient-provider relationships. As healthcare integrates artificial intelligence (AI) into patient communication, we have yet to understand how these models' communication compares to that of physicians. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objectives were to examine patient preferences for AI-generated vs. palliative care physician-generated empathic statements addressing fear and anxiety around cancer treatment, and to analyze associations between linguistic features and patient preferences. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the PALL-AI trial, a randomized controlled survey comparing cancer patients' preferences of AI- to physician-generated empathic statements. Physicians and AI were provided the same prompt with a maximum sentence length. Patient preferences for each statement were measured in blinded surveys. We analyzed sentiment of the statements using the Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner (VADER) and the National Research Council Canada (NRC) Emotion Lexicon. We evaluated associations between sentiment scores and patient preferences using Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients completed blinded surveys, preferring the AI-generated statement 72.4% of the time. VADER sentiment analysis showed all three AI statements displayed positive sentiment, while all three physician statements displayed negative sentiment. Controlling for statement length, AI statements used twice as many positive words as human statements. However, they contained a similar number of negative words. Of the eight NRC emotions, "trust" and "joy" demonstrated the strongest correlations with patient preference. CONCLUSION: Patients preferred AI-generated statements around cancer care over those from palliative care physicians when standardized for prompt and statement length. Analysis shows AI-generated statements contain more positive language which may be the factor driving patient preference toward AI.

Humans↗