Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2025

TRIM63 Overexpression in FISH-Negative MiTF Family Altered Renal Cell Carcinoma (MiTF RCC).

TFE3 and TFEB break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assays are the "gold standard" for diagnostic confirmation of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MiTF) family-altered renal cell carcinoma (MiTF RCC), which includes TFE3-rearranged RCC and TFEB-altered RCC. However, FISH assays, for multiple reasons, may lead to equivocal or false-negative results, especially in cryptic fusions resulting from intrachromosomal inversions involving 5' partner genes, such as non-POU domain-containing octamer-binding protein (NONO); GRIPI-associated protein 1 (GRIPAP1); RNA-binding motif protein, X chromosome (RBMX); and RNA-binding motif protein 10 (RBM10). When FISH results are negative in cases with strong morphological suspicion of the listed tumor entities, pathologists may recommend targeted RT-PCR or panel-based RNA fusion sequencing for diagnostic confirmation. Our recent RNA in situ hybridization (RNA ISH)-based study demonstrated RNA expression of the tripartite motif containing 63 (TRIM63) to be highly enriched in TFE3-rearranged RCC and TFEB-altered RCC, including 2 FISH false-negative RCC cases harboring RBM10::TFE3 fusion. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that TRIM63 positivity could aid in diagnosing cases that are negative by conventional FISH assay but remain morphologically suspicious, representing an unmet clinical need in this area. We collected 20 RCC cases with morphological suspicion (with equivocal/indeterminate immunohistochemistry panel) of MiTF RCC, which were TRIM63 positive, negative/equivocal for TFE3/TFEB gene rearrangement by FISH, and underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS). On NGS correlation, 14 of 20 (70%) FISH-negative TRIM63-positive tumors harbored an MiTF gene rearrangement. In the remaining 6 cases, we were unable to fully ascertain the MiTF rearrangement status due to the inherent limitation of the NGS panel utilized. The cases with MiTF gene rearrangement include TFE3 rearrangement in 60% (12/20) and TFEB low-level copy gains (with an additional missense mutation in 1 case) in 10% (2/20) of samples. RBM10:TFE3 fusion was seen in 67% (8/12) of TFE3-rearranged RCC in this cohort. TRIM63 RNA ISH assay could aid in identifying cases that harbor TFE3 or TFEB rearrangement associated with false-negative or equivocal TFE3/TFEB FISH results, especially those involving gene fusions with a paracentric Xp11 inversion. Overall, employment of TRIM63 RNA ISH coupled with TFE3/TFEB FISH assays and follow-up genomic interrogation enhanced diagnostic accuracy for patients with MiTF RCC.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗
PubMed2026

Histone demethylase PHF2 drives olanzapine-induced dyslipidemia via epigenomic rewiring of hepatic lipogenic genes.

Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic agent, is widely used in treating psychotic disorders, yet its metabolic side effects remain a clinical concern. Emerging evidence suggests that dynamic alterations in histone methylation are implicated in olanzapine-induced hepatic lipid metabolic disorders. PHF2, a JmjC family histone demethylase mediating H3K9me2 demethylation, functions as a transcriptional repressor by regulating downstream targets. To elucidate PHF2's role in this process, we utilized an olanzapine-induced dyslipidemia rat model. ChIP-qPCR analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in dimethylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me2) on the promoters of lipogenic genes (Fasn, Acc1, Scd1) in the liver, accompanied by elevated nuclear expression of PHF2 in olanzapine-treated rats. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays revealed a physical interaction between PHF2 and ChREBP, a glucose-responsive lipogenic transcription factor. Olanzapine was found to enhance the formation of this complex. Overexpression of PHF2 led to upregulated protein levels of FASN/ACC1 and intracellular lipid accumulation, whereas knockdown of PHF2 using siRNA attenuated these effects. Notably, the upregulation of FASN/ACC1 expression induced by olanzapine was markedly diminished in PHF2-deficient AML12 cells via ChREBP-PHF2-mediated H3K9me2 demethylation. Additionally, olanzapine inhibited the nuclear translocation of FOXA2, a PHF2 transcriptional regulator, thereby augmenting PHF2 expression. These findings uncover a novel epigenetic mechanism underlying olanzapine-induced dyslipidemia, positioning the FOXA2-PHF2-ChREBP axis as a potential therapeutic target through modulation of hepatic histone methylation.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Relative contribution of PDX-1, MafA and E47/beta2 to the regulation of the human insulin promoter.

The insulin promoter binds a number of tissue-specific and ubiquitous transcription factors. Of these, the homoeodomain protein PDX-1 (pancreatic duodenal homeobox factor-1), the basic leucine zipper protein MafA and the basic helix-loop-helix heterodimer E47/BETA2 (beta-cell E box transactivator 2; referred to here as beta2) bind to important regulatory sites. Previous studies have shown that PDX-1 can interact synergistically with E47 and beta2 to activate the rat insulin 1 promoter. The aim of the present study was to determine the relative contribution of PDX-1, MafA and E47/beta2 in regulating the human insulin promoter, and whether these factors could interact synergistically in the context of the human promoter. Mutagenesis of the PDX-1, MafA and E47/beta2 binding sites reduced promoter activity by 60, 74 and 94% respectively, in INS-1 beta-cells. In the islet glucagonoma cell line alphaTC1.6, overexpression of PDX-1 and MafA separately increased promoter activity approx. 2.5-3-fold, and in combination approx. 6-fold, indicating that their overall effect was additive. Overexpression of E47 and beta2 had no effect. In HeLa cells, PDX-1 stimulated the basal promoter by approx. 40-fold, whereas MafA, E47 and beta2 each increased activity by less than 2-fold. There was no indication of any synergistic effects on the human insulin promoter. On the other hand, the rat insulin 1 promoter and a mutated version of the human insulin promoter, in which the relevant regulatory elements were separated by the same distances as in the rat insulin 1 promoter, did exhibit synergy. PDX-1 was shown further to activate the endogenous insulin 1 gene in alphaTC1.6 cells, whereas MafA activated the insulin 2 gene. In combination, PDX-1 and MafA activated both insulin genes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays confirmed that PDX-1 increased the association of acetylated histones H3 and H4 with the insulin 1 gene and MafA increased the association of acetylated histone H3 with the insulin 2 gene.

Animals↗
PubMed2026

BHLHE40 and ChREBP associate with hepatic enhancer clusters containing PPARα, RXRα, and HNF4 nuclear receptors.

BHLHE40/DEC1 is a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor (TF) that regulates circadian rhythm and T-cell responses. In hepatocytes, its function and interplay with other TFs are poorly understood. Employing a genome-wide approach, we show that its genomic binding strongly overlapped with that of carbohydrate response-element binding protein, a sugar-sensing TF and known inducer of BHLHE40 expression. Transcriptomic analysis of primary mouse hepatocytes revealed reduced expression of genes involved in genomic stability on Bhlhe40 knockdown by siRNA. Bhlhe40 depletion potentiated fructose responsiveness of genes involved in cell-cycle regulation. Strikingly, genomic binding of BHLHE40 extensively overlapped with enhancers occupied by PPARα, RXRα, and HNF4 nuclear receptors and BHLHE40 fine-tuned the expression of PPARα target genes. Using HEK293 cells, we further observed that BHLHE40 physically interacted with RXRα and PPARα cofactors. Collectively, our data suggest that through cooperation with carbohydrate response-element binding protein and nuclear receptors, BHLHE40 is a central regulator of hepatic gene expression with potential to integrate inputs from nutrient signals contributing to the metabolic flexibility of the liver.

Animals↗