In silico genome mining and characterization of putative horse feces-derived bacterial phytases as potential monogastric animal feed additive candidates.
Phytic acid exerts a significant antinutritional effect in poultry, swine, and fish, which can be mitigated by supplementing monogastric feeds with efficient microbial phytases. Accordingly, mining bacterial genomes for novel phytases represents a strategic computational approach to identifying candidates for improving monogastric animal nutrition. In this study, 162 bacterial genomes associated with horse feces were systematically mined using an in silico pipeline to identify and characterize putative phytases.A total of 69 non-redundant sequences were identified and classified as histidine acid phytase (HAPhy) or protein tyrosine phosphatase-like phytase (PTPLPhy). HAPhys were detected in the genomes of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella enterica, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Cutibacterium equinum, whereas PTPLPhys were found in K. pneumoniae, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium pseudolongum, and Prescottella equi. Principal component analysis identified glucose-1-phosphatase (CAJ1242485.1) and bifunctional acid phosphatase (NHR17779.1) as the HAPhy candidates exhibiting the most favorable predicted physicochemical properties for potential feed applications. Similarly, among the PTPLPhys, protein tyrosine phosphatase (UNQ40438.1) and a hypothetical protein (CAJ1246072.1) showed the most favorable computational profiles. Biosafety analysis identified potential virulence factors, indicating that sources should be screened prior to feed application. High-quality AlphaFold2 models were obtained for these phytases (90.9-97.2). Molecular docking analysis showed that NHR17779.1 exhibited the strongest binding to phytic acid, whereas CAJ1246072.1 demonstrated the weakest interaction. Overall, this study identifies the horse fecal microbiota as a diverse source of putative phytases that may serve as promising targets for genetic and protein engineering; however, further in vitro and in vivo studies are essential to validate the enzymatic activity and industrial efficacy of these computational candidates.