SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “BRCA1”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2018

Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

BACKGROUND: The presence of deleterious mutations in breast cancer 1 gene (BRCA1) or breast cancer 2 gene (BRCA2) significantly increases the risk of developing some cancers, such as breast and high-grade serous cancer (HGSC) of ovarian, tubal and peritoneal origin. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is usually recommended to BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers after completion of childbearing. Despite prior systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the role of RRSO in reducing the mortality and incidence of breast, HGSC and other cancers, RRSO is still an area of debate and it is unclear whether RRSO differs in effectiveness by type of mutation carried. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of RRSO in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 7) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid and trial registries, with no language restrictions up to July 2017. We handsearched abstracts of scientific meetings and other relevant publications. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included non-randomised trials (NRS), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case series that used statistical adjustment for baseline case mix using multivariable analyses comparing RRSO versus no RRSO in women without a previous or coexisting breast, ovarian or fallopian tube malignancy, in women with or without hysterectomy, and in women with a risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) before, with or after RRSO. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data and performed meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HR) for time-to-event variables and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). To assess bias in the studies, we used the ROBINS-I 'Risk of bias' assessment tool. We quantified inconsistency between studies by estimating the I2 statistic. We used random-effects models to calculate pooled effect estimates. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 cohort studies, comprising 8087 participants (2936 (36%) surgical participants and 5151 (64%) control participants who were BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. All the studies compared RRSO with or without RRM versus no RRSO (surveillance). The certainty of evidence by GRADE assessment was very low due to serious risk of bias. Nine studies, including 7927 women, were included in the meta-analyses. The median follow-up period ranged from 0.5 to 27.4 years. MAIN OUTCOMES: overall survival was longer with RRSO compared with no RRSO (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.54; P < 0.001; 3 studies, 2548 women; very low-certainty evidence). HGSC cancer mortality (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.17; I² = 69%; P < 0.0001; 3 studies, 2534 women; very low-certainty evidence) and breast cancer mortality (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.88; I² = 65%; P = 0.009; 7 studies, 7198 women; very low-certainty evidence) were lower with RRSO compared with no RRSO. None of the studies reported bone fracture incidence. There was a difference in favour of RRSO compared with no RRSO in terms of ovarian cancer risk perception quality of life (MD 15.40, 95% CI 8.76 to 22.04; P < 0.00001; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported adverse events.Subgroup analyses for main outcomes: meta-analysis showed an increase in overall survival among women who had RRSO versus women without RRSO who were BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.52; P < 0001; I² = 23%; 3 studies; very low-certainty evidence) and BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.85; P = 0.01; I² = 0%; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence). The meta-analysis showed a decrease in HGSC cancer mortality among women with RRSO versus no RRSO who were BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.41; I² = 54%; P = 0.001; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence), but uncertain for BRCA2 mutation carriers due to low frequency of HGSC cancer deaths in BRCA2 mutation carriers. There was a decrease in breast cancer mortality among women with RRSO versus no RRSO who were BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.67; I² = 0%; P < 0.0001; 4 studies; very low-certainty evidence), but not for BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.87; I² = 63%; P = 0.75; 3 studies; very low-certainty evidence). One study showed a difference in favour of RRSO versus no RRSO in improving quality of life for ovarian cancer risk perception in women who were BRCA1 mutation carriers (MD 10.70, 95% CI 2.45 to 18.95; P = 0.01; 98 women; very low-certainty evidence) and BRCA2 mutation carriers (MD 13.00, 95% CI 3.59 to 22.41; P = 0.007; very low-certainty evidence). Data from one study showed a difference in favour of RRSO and RRM versus no RRSO in increasing overall survival (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.98; P = 0.0001; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence), but no difference for breast cancer mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.19; P = 0.25; very low-certainty evidence). The risk estimates for breast cancer mortality according to age at RRSO (50 years of age or less versus more than 50 years) was not protective and did not differ for BRCA1 (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.11; I² = 16%; P = 0.23; very low-certainty evidence) and BRCA2 carriers (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.87; I² = 63%; P = 0.75; very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is very low-certainty evidence that RRSO may increase overall survival and lower HGSC and breast cancer mortality for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that RRSO reduces the risk of death from HGSC and breast cancer in women with BRCA1 mutations. Evidence for the effect of RRSO on HGSC and breast cancer in BRCA2 carriers was very uncertain due to low numbers. These results should be interpreted with caution due to questionable study designs, risk of bias profiles, and very low-certainty evidence. We cannot draw any conclusions regarding bone fracture incidence, quality of life, or severe adverse events for RRSO, or for effects of RRSO based on type and age at risk-reducing surgery. Further research on these outcomes is warranted to explore differential effects for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Adult↗

PubMed2024

BRCA1 safeguards genome integrity by activating chromosome asynapsis checkpoint to eliminate recombination-defective oocytes.

In the meiotic prophase, programmed DNA double-strand breaks are repaired by meiotic recombination. Recombination-defective meiocytes are eliminated to preserve genome integrity in gametes. BRCA1 is a critical protein in somatic homologous recombination, but studies have suggested that BRCA1 is dispensable for meiotic recombination. Here we show that BRCA1 is essential for meiotic recombination. Interestingly, BRCA1 also has a function in eliminating recombination-defective oocytes. Brca1 knockout (KO) rescues the survival of Dmc1 KO oocytes far more efficiently than removing CHK2, a vital component of the DNA damage checkpoint in oocytes. Mechanistically, BRCA1 activates chromosome asynapsis checkpoint by promoting ATR activity at unsynapsed chromosome axes in Dmc1 KO oocytes. Moreover, Brca1 KO also rescues the survival of asynaptic Spo11 KO oocytes. Collectively, our study not only unveils an unappreciated role of chromosome asynapsis in eliminating recombination-defective oocytes but also reveals the dual functions of BRCA1 in safeguarding oocyte genome integrity.

Oocytes↗

PubMed2026

The 1H, 15N and 13C backbone resonance assignments of an intrinsically disordered region (467-696) of breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1).

The tumor suppressor protein breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) plays a central role in maintaining genome stability through its involvement in DNA damage repair, transcriptional regulation, and cell-cycle control. BRCA1 functions as an obligate heterodimer with its binding partner, the BRCA1-associated RING domain protein 1 (BARD1), to coordinate accurate DNA repair. While the structured N- and C-terminal domains of BRCA1 have been well-characterized, the large central region encoded largely by exon 11 that comprises ~ 80% of the protein, is intrinsically disordered, and remains poorly structurally characterized. This intrinsically disordered region (IDR) harbors critical interaction interfaces for key proteins involved in genome maintenance, including RAD50, RAD51, MYC, and RB. Here, we report the backbone resonance assignments of a BRCA1 IDR construct spanning residues 467-696, providing a foundation for future studies aimed at understanding how the disordered central region of BRCA1 contributes to homologous recombination, interactions with BARD1, and overall BRCA1 tumor suppressor function.

BRCA1 Protein↗

PubMed2026

Functions and mechanisms of BRCA1 in early embryonic development.

Breast Cancer Gene 1 (BRCA1) is a critical regulator of genome integrity whose dysfunction greatly increases lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancers. While BRCA1 has been extensively studied in the contexts of adult biology and cancer, its diverse functions, including homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, protein ubiquitination, and transcriptional regulation, have many underexplored implications. In early embryonic development, the maternal-to-zygotic transition (MZT) and subsequent developmental processes place extraordinary demands on DNA replication fidelity, cell cycle regulation, transcriptional activation, and chromatin remodeling. These critical processes overlap strikingly with canonical functions of BRCA1, yet its function in early development is poorly characterized. In this review, we investigate BRCA1 conservation across species and connect its well-established functions to findings from developmental studies to assess its role in development. We highlight evidence of BRCA1 mitigating genome integrity loss from diverse sources, maintaining the proliferative activity needed for successful germ layer formation and early tissue morphogenesis, and regulating transcription and epigenetic modifications. Together, this synthesis supports a model where BRCA1 acts as a multi-functional and dynamic regulator of early embryogenesis. Building on this, we propose outstanding questions that could further illuminate these developmental roles. Characterization of BRCA1 in early development may not only provide important insight into the origin and progression of cancer susceptibility but may also elucidate fundamental mechanisms shaping early development.

BRCA1 Protein↗

PubMed2026

Risks of non-breast, non-ovarian cancers for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The non-breast non-ovarian cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PVs) are controversial. We aimed to examine this using a prospective cohort design. METHODS: This study included 1260 BRCA1 and 1058 BRCA2 PV carriers (91% were females) from two consortia: the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR) and the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer Follow-Up Study (kConFab-FUS). The carriers were free of cancer other than breast or ovarian cancer at baseline and had a median baseline age of 45.5 years. For 16 types of non-breast, non-ovarian cancers, standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) relative to population incidence, the probabilities of relative risk effect size > 2 (i.e., moderate risk) and cumulative risks to age 80 years were estimated. RESULTS: During a median follow-up time of 11.4 years, 161 non-breast, non-ovarian cancers were observed. For BRCA1 PV carriers, little evidence of increased risk was observed. The prostate, pancreatic, and all non-pancreatic cancer SIRs were 1.7 (95% CI 0.7-4.2), 1.1 (95% CI 0.3-4.6) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.68-1.06), respectively; the probabilities of relative risk > 2 were 0 and 67% for prostate and pancreatic cancers, respectively. For BRCA2 PV carriers, increased risks of pancreatic (SIR = 6.6, 95% CI 3.8-11.6), prostate (SIR = 3.6, 95% CI 1.9-6.8) and stomach (SIR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.01-9.8) cancer were observed, with a cumulative risk to age 80 years of 8.3, 82.0, and 1.6%, respectively. For all the other non-breast, non-ovarian cancers combined, the SIR was 0.85 (95% CI 0.66-1.10). CONCLUSIONS: Apart from pancreatic, prostate, and possibly stomach cancers for BRCA2 PV carriers, and possibly pancreatic cancer for BRCA1 PV carriers, there is no evidence that BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV carriers have substantially increased risks of other non-breast, non-ovarian cancers. Our prospective risk estimates are informative for cancer risk assessment for people with BRCA1 and BRCA2 PVs.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The1H, 15N and13C backbone resonance assignments of an intrinsically disordered region (124-270) of BRCA1 associated RING domain 1 (BARD1).

The BRCA1-associated RING domain protein 1 (BARD1) is the obligate binding partner of the tumor suppressor breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) and plays a critical role in maintaining genome integrity. BARD1 contains structured N- and C-terminal domains that mediate heterodimerization with BRCA1, recognition of chromatin marks, and DNA repair functions. Approximately 40% of BARD1 is intrinsically disordered, particularly in the central region of the protein. This intrinsically disordered region (IDR) engages DNA and key repair proteins such as RAD51, BLM, and WRN. DNA binding through the BARD1 IDR facilitates H2A ubiquitination by the BRCA1-BARD1 complex and is essential for stimulating long-range DNA end resection during homologous recombination, underscoring its role in accurate DNA repair. Despite these insights, structural characterization of the IDR remains limited, leaving questions regarding its functional interplay with BRCA1 and other repair factors unresolved. Here, we report the backbone resonance assignments of a BARD1 IDR construct spanning residues 124-270, providing a foundation for future studies aimed at understanding how the disordered regions of BARD1 interact with various binding partners, and cooperates with itself and BRCA1 to regulate genome stability.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular↗

PubMed2026

[BRCA1 Gene's Mutations And Hereditary Breast Cancer: Genetic, Biological, And Clinical Aspects].

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary breast cancer accounts for approximately 5 to 10% of all breast cancer cases. Mutations in the BRCA1 gene, which plays a central role in DNA repair and cell cycle regulation, are the main cause of these familial forms and are strongly associated with aggressive subtypes, particularly triple-negative breast cancer. METHODS: A narrative literature review was conducted using biomedical databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar) between January 2024 and June 2025. Eligible publications addressed the genetic, biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of BRCA1 in hereditary breast cancer. RESULTS: BRCA1 ensures genomic stability through its roles in DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints, and transcriptional regulation. Most mutations are truncating or missense variants, with some reported as founder mutations (e.g., c.68_69delAG, c.5266dupC, 943ins10). Women carrying germline BRCA1 mutations have an estimated lifetime risk of 56-87% of developing breast cancer, with a strong association with aggressive molecular subtypes, especially triple-negative breast cancer. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive understanding of BRCA1 mutations is crucial to enhance prevention, screening, and personalized management of hereditary breast cancer. In low-resource settings, the integration of genetic testing and counseling remains a major challenge and a public health priority to reduce disparities in cancer care.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Copy number variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Polish patients with breast and ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: BRCA1 and BRCA2 are key susceptibility genes in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), with mutational status guiding PARP inhibitor therapy. While single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) predominate, the prevalence of copy number variants (CNVs) varies significantly across different populations. This study aims to determine the incidence of BRCA1/2 CNVs in the Polish population, where data remain scarce due to non-mandatory CNV testing. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the results of genetic tests assessing the presence of BRCA1/2 CNVs performed in 2720 individuals tested at the Lower Silesian Oncology Centre (2021-2024), including 2702 breast/ovarian cancer patients and 18 unaffected relatives. The mean age was 54.7 ± 15.15 years. Genetic testing involved DNA extraction, NGS, and MLPA for CNV confirmation. Variants were classified according to ACMG-AMP guidelines and verified through independent testing. RESULTS: In this study, no BRCA2 CNVs were identified, consistent with previous Central European findings. Pathogenic BRCA1 CNVs were detected in 0.85% of the analyzed cohort and in 0.52% of the cancer patient subgroup, affecting 23 individuals from 13 families. Eight distinct BRCA1 CNVs were detected, the most common being exon 21 deletion. Affected families exhibited a high incidence of HBOC-related cancers, with early-onset breast cancer and a notable proportion of triple-negative breast cancer cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the clinical significance of BRCA1 CNVs in Polish patients with HBOC-spectrum cancers and their families. Although rare, these variants were associated with aggressive cancer phenotypes and early onset. Given their diagnostic and therapeutic implications, BRCA1 CNVs should be routinely analysed in high-risk families to ensure accurate detection and personalised treatment planning.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

BRCA1-A and LIG4 complexes mediate ecDNA biogenesis and cancer drug resistance.

Extrachromosomal circular DNA (ecDNA) is frequently generated within the nucleus, contributing to genome dynamics and heterogeneity, thereby promoting cancer cell evolution and adaptation. However, the mechanisms underlying ecDNA biogenesis remain poorly understood. Here, using genome-wide CRISPR screening in human cells, we identified the BRCA1-A and the LIG4 complexes as key drivers of ecDNA production. Following DNA segmentation, the upstream BRCA1-A complex protects DNA ends from excessive resection, promoting end-joining for circularization. Conversely, the MRN complex, which mediates end resection and thus antagonizes the BRCA1-A complex, suppresses ecDNA formation. Downstream, LIG4 conservatively mediates ecDNA production by joining the free ends of the DNA fragments. Furthermore, ecDNA from patient tumors harbors junction sites with a LIG4 signature. Notably, disruption of either LIG4 or the BRCA1-A complex in cancer cells impairs ecDNA-mediated adaptation, hindering the development of resistance to both chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Together, our study reveals the roles of the LIG4 and BRCA1-A complexes in ecDNA biogenesis, and uncovers therapeutic targets to block ecDNA-mediated adaptation for cancer treatment.

Humans↗

PubMed2022

Autologous K63 deubiquitylation within the BRCA1-A complex licenses DNA damage recognition.

The BRCA1-A complex contains matching lysine-63 ubiquitin (K63-Ub) binding and deubiquitylating activities. How these functionalities are coordinated to effectively respond to DNA damage remains unknown. We generated Brcc36 deubiquitylating enzyme (DUB) inactive mice to address this gap in knowledge in a physiologic system. DUB inactivation impaired BRCA1-A complex damage localization and repair activities while causing early lethality when combined with Brca2 mutation. Damage response dysfunction in DUB-inactive cells corresponded to increased K63-Ub on RAP80 and BRCC36. Chemical cross-linking coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and cryogenic-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analyses of isolated BRCA1-A complexes demonstrated the RAP80 ubiquitin interaction motifs are occupied by ubiquitin exclusively in the DUB-inactive complex, linking auto-inhibition by internal K63-Ub chains to loss of damage site ubiquitin recognition. These findings identify RAP80 and BRCC36 as autologous DUB substrates in the BRCA1-A complex, thus explaining the evolution of matching ubiquitin-binding and hydrolysis activities within a single macromolecular assembly.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

RNA splicing evidence enables robust classification of BRCA1 exon 18 variants: Results from the ENIGMA consortium.

The Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) research consortium conducted a comprehensive study to characterize spliceogenic variants in BRCA1 exon 18. The absence of systematic RNA-based assessment for these variants has led to inconsistent interpretation, limiting accurate classification and management of individuals and their families. The splicing profile of 166 variants was assessed using minigene assays; 32 were additionally analyzed in blood-derived RNA from 51 individuals and 18 in mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC)-based assays to evaluate homology-directed repair (HDR) capacity. mRNA assessment by RT-PCR in blood samples and minigene assays showed a significant positive correlation, with splicing analysis in mESCs displaying highly concordant results. The mESC-based HDR assay showed that the in-frame exon 18 skipping (Δ18) transcript encodes a non-functional protein lacking rescue activity. Linear regression analysis using mESC splicing and functional data indicated that ≥59% of full-length (FL) levels and <34% of Δ18 were associated with benign HDR activity. These thresholds differ from those recommended by the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) specifications for applying BP7_strong(RNA): >30% functional transcripts or <70% non-functional transcripts. Incorporation of RNA splicing evidence into variant interpretation increased pathogenic (28.6%-31.7%) and benign (3.7%-24.4%) classifications while reducing likely pathogenic (19.5%-17.7%), uncertain (18.9%-8.5%), and likely benign (29.3%-17.7%) categories. Experimental mRNA profiling impacted the interpretation of 34% of variants and resolved uncertainty in approximately 10% of cases. Exon 18 skipping was less tolerated, indicating that the degree of splice perturbation required to impair BRCA1 function may depend on the nature of the resulting non-functional transcript.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

BRCA1 Exon 11 Mutations in Breast Cancer: A Study From Pakistan.

Breast cancer ranks among the top causes of cancer-related deaths in women around the globe, with genetic mutations in the BRCA1 gene being a frequent cause of breast or ovarian cancer. This study investigates hotspot mutations in exon 11 of the BRCA1 gene among Pakistani women diagnosed with breast cancer. Thirty clinically diagnosed breast cancer patients, all women, were enrolled in the current study, and high-quality DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples. Two of the twenty-five successfully sequenced samples had a homozygous missense variant (c.2312T > C: p.Leu771Ser) detected by Sanger sequencing after PCR amplification. Upon investigation in the ClinVar database, the identified variant showed conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity. Demographic data highlighted an early disease onset, showing that 56% of patients were under 50 years of age. The need for genetic screening was further supported by the fact that 24% of the patients had a positive family history of cancer. Our study emphasizes the necessity of screening BRCA1 gene mutations to better understand the pathogenic potential of the identified variants in the Pakistani population.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A Novel BRCA1 Pathogenic Variant in Tunisian Patient With High Grade Ovarian Cancer: Favorable Therapeutic Response to Olaparib.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is one of the leading causes of death from gynecological cancer worldwide. Genetic mutations in genes involved in key cellular functions such as BRCA1/2 play a central role in tumorigenesis and have major implications for targeted therapeutic strategies, especially the use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. CASE: Herein, we described a case of a 50-year-old woman diagnosed with severe anemia secondary to heavy menometrorrhagia. Initial gynecological evaluation, including transvaginal ultrasound, was unremarkable, and endometrial biopsy was not indicated. Imaging revealed no ovarian abnormalities; however, exploratory laparotomy identified a peritoneal nodule, leading to further investigation. Targeted NGS was performed on somatic and germline DNA samples and showed a frame shift deletion of 10 bp (c.1256_1265del: p.R419Ter) in the BRCA1 gene. This variant, identified only in tumor tissues, is novel and classified as pathogenic in ClinVar and ACMG databases. Additional somatic alterations were detected in TP53 and MSH6, while germline testing revealed only a variant of uncertain significance in BARD1. After first-line chemotherapy, the patient benefited from olaparib and achieved a progression-free survival of 23 months with good tolerance and no evidence of disease recurrence. CONCLUSION: This finding highlights the importance of integrating tumor-based genomic profiling with germline testing to identify actionable mutations and guide precision oncology. The identification of a novel somatic BRCA1 mutation expands the mutational spectrum of HGSOC and underscores the need to include underrepresented populations, such as those from North Africa, in genomic studies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The Clinical Application of Refined Risk Estimates Study in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

UNLABELLED: Individuals with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PV) may struggle with risk management decision-making. Advancements in technology could provide more specific risk information to patients, but the impact of this information is unknown. The Clinical Application of Refined Risk Estimates Study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial in women with a BRCA1/BRCA2 PV. The primary objective was to determine whether genotype-informed personalized cancer risk estimates (GRE) compared with standard lifetime cancer risk estimates (SRE) decreased decisional conflict related to cancer risk management decision-making. Women were recruited following the disclosure of their PV results. Participants completed a baseline survey and were randomized 1:1 to receive a GRE or SRE. After receiving their results, participants completed a follow-up survey. Likert and continuous data measures were analyzed using linear regression. There were no differences in decisional conflict between study arms at follow-up. However, individuals in the SRE arm showed an increased need for personal structure compared with those in the GRE arm (P = 0.02). Compared with baseline, individuals within the SRE arm showed decreased decisional conflict (P = 0.003) and increased perceived stress (P = 0.02) at follow-up. A more personalized cancer risk estimate did not decrease decisional conflict in women with BRCA1/BRCA2 PVs. Future studies will determine whether a GRE affects actual decision-making behaviors. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Women with a germline PV in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have significantly elevated risks of developing breast and ovarian cancers. This randomized controlled trial evaluates the impact of polygenic risk scores on decisional conflict related to breast and ovarian cancer prevention and risk management in those with BRCA1/BRCA2 PVs.

Humans↗

PubMed2024

Activated NAD+ biosynthesis pathway induces olaparib resistance in BRCA1 knockout pancreatic cancer cells.

PARP inhibitors have been developed as anti-cancer agents based on synthetic lethality in homologous recombination deficient cancer cells. However, resistance to PARP inhibitors such as olaparib remains a problem in clinical use, and the mechanisms of resistance are not fully understood. To investigate mechanisms of PARP inhibitor resistance, we established a BRCA1 knockout clone derived from the pancreatic cancer MIA PaCa-2 cells, which we termed C1 cells, and subsequently isolated an olaparib-resistant C1/OLA cells. We then performed RNA-sequencing and pathway analysis on olaparib-treated C1 and C1/OLA cells. Our results revealed activation of cell signaling pathway related to NAD+ metabolism in the olaparib-resistant C1/OLA cells, with increased expression of genes encoding the NAD+ biosynthetic enzymes NAMPT and NMNAT2. Moreover, intracellular NAD+ levels were significantly higher in C1/OLA cells than in the non-olaparib-resistant C1 cells. Upregulation of intracellular NAD+ levels by the addition of nicotinamide also induced resistance to olaparib and talazoparib in C1 cells. Taken together, our findings suggest that upregulation of intracellular NAD+ is one of the factors underlying the acquisition of PARP inhibitor resistance.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Reply to: Role of Risk-Reducing Bilateral Mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Homologous recombination-deficient high-grade serous ovarian cancers exhibit distinct morphological features.

OBJECTIVE: Access to homologous recombination testing remains limited in many centers. We aim to correlate the morphology and immunophenotype of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with homologous recombination statuses. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma tumors with known homologous recombination status. A pathological review of morphology was performed for each tumor, along with immunohistochemical profiling. Tumor morphology was classified as (1) solid, pseudo-endometrioid, or transitional (2) micropapillary or nested. RESULTS: Overall, 81 tumors were included. The median age was 62 (interquartile range; 52-71). Of those, 27 (33.3%) tumors were BRCA1mut, 19 (23.5%) were BRCA2mut, 15 (18.5%) tumors had no BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations but exhibited a genomic instability score ≥42 and were classified as BRCA1/2-wild-type with homologous recombinant deficient. The remainder 20 (24.7%) cases were homologous recombinant proficient. The proportion of tumors with solid transitional-like morphology was higher in BRCA1 (12/21, 57%) and BRCA2 (12/18, 67%) compared to the tumors with homologous recombinant proficient (3/17, 18%), p =.019. When stratified by genomic instability score, tumors with low score (genomic instability score <26) exhibited 0% solid transitional-like morphology versus 43% solid transitional-like morphology in high-score (genomic instability score >26), p =.03. PAX8 diffuse expression was detected in 71% of BRCA1, 65% of BRCA2, 92% of BRCA-wild-type homologous recombinant deficient tumors, and 100% of homologous recombinant proficient tumors, p =.071. The proportion of diffuse expression was higher in homologous recombinant proficient (100%) versus BRCA2 (65%) (Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Homologous recombinant deficient tumors are associated with the solid transitional-like morphology, with the BRCA1/2-mutated homologous recombinant deficient cases showing the strongest correlation. Genomic instability score alone may not fully capture the spectrum of homologous recombinant deficient-related phenotypes. The variation in solid transitional-like morphology features among BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated, BRCA1/2- wild-type with homologous recombinant deficient, and homologous recombinant proficient cases may reflect the diverse biological spectrum of different homologous recombination alterations.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Systemic immune activation in hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Immune surveillance mechanisms contribute to the elimination of precancerous lesions in hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes (HCPSs). METHODS: By combining single-cell transcriptomics, multiparametric mass cytometry and cytokine profiling of the systemic immune environment in 391 individuals among whom 227 are living with HCPSs we investigated phenotypic alterations in cancer-free individuals with HCPS. RESULTS: A decrease in peripheral B cell abundance and their more differentiated phenotype have been confirmed both in breast cancer patients with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 (gpath(BRCA1)) and in patients living with Lynch syndrome (LS). Pre-cancer women with gpath(BRCA1) exhibited an activated phenotype of multiple immune cell lineages, similar to those with manifest disease. In LS, B cell phenotypes exhibited the largest changes in response to cancer eradication, while increased peripheral IL-6 levels was detected even in presymptomatic individuals with LS. CONCLUSIONS: HCPS-specific differences in the phenotype of the systemic immune system might be leveraged in future risk-reducing strategies.

Humans↗