Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “BOOKS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1974

Current status of biomedical book reviewing: Part IV. Major American and British biomedical book publishers.

This is the fourth part of a comprehensive, quantitative study of biomedical book reviews. The data base of the total project was built from statistics of 3,347 reviews of 2,067 biomedical books taken from all 1970 issues of fifty-four reviewing journals. This part of the study identifies the major American and British biomedical book publishers in terms of their quantitative production of book titles reviewed, and determines the relationships among these publishers. It is found that Williams & Wilkins, Charles C Thomas, Academic Press, and Springer Verlag are the most productive biomedical book publishers in terms of books reviewed in 1970. These four publishers accounted for 32% of the 1,674 books available in the United States and reviewed in the reviewing media in 1970. Williams & Wilkins is especially significant by virtue of reprint activity. The present study also explores the price trend of biomedical books. It is found that the mean price for 1,077 books studied was $16.20 per volume, with a standard deviation of $9.42.

Biology↗
PubMed2000

Dusting off old books: comments on classic gynecologic pathology books of yesteryear.

Selected outstanding books from the older literature on gynecological pathology are reviewed with emphasis on drawing attention to the abundant helpful information and outstanding illustrations that are worthy of review by present-day pathologists. The first three works are Cancer of the Uterus, Myomata of the Uterus, and Adenomyoma of the Uterus by Thomas S. Cullen. The senior author of the second book is Howard A. Kelly even though he did not have any role in the preparation of the text; he was given senior authorship by Dr. Cullen as a token of appreciation to his mentor. The next book, Fibroids and Allied Tumors by Cuthbert Lockyer, is particularly noteworthy for the quality of the numerous color illustrations. The final book on the uterus is The Cervix Uteri and Its Diseases by C. Frederic Fluhmann. It provides detailed coverage of the normal and pathologic aspects of the cervix, including the endocervical clefts (glands) and their abnormalities. The next three books are on the ovary: Ovarian Tumors by Samuel H. Geist, Atlas of Ovarian Tumors by Gemma Barzilai, and Endocrine Pathology of the Ovary by John McLean Morris and Robert E. Scully. The first is notable for the quality of the coverage of clinical and gross aspects of ovarian tumors and the second for the quality of the description of the microscopic features. The third book expanded the range of functioning ovarian tumors by showing that this could be a feature of tumors not usually considered hormonally active and also discussed in detail the endocrine function of non-neoplastic lesions. The final two books cover general gynecological pathology: Manual of Obstetrical and Gynaecological Pathology by John H. Teacher and Gynecological and Obstetrical Pathology by Emil Novak. Both have particularly outstanding coverage of normal histology and non-neoplastic lesions.

Female↗
PubMed1995

Books, books, books.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Computer Communication Networks↗
PubMed1974

Current status of biomedical book reviewing: Part III. Duplication patterns in biomedical book reviewing.

This is the third part of a comprehensive, quantitative study of biomedical book reviewing. The data base of the total project was built from statistics of 3,347 reviews of 2,067 biomedical books appearing in all 1970 issues of fifty-four reviewing journals. This part of the study explores the duplication patterns in book reviewing among these media. It is found that 35.17% (727 books) of the 2,067 titles were reviewed more than once in 1970, these titles accounting for 2,007 of the total of 3,347 reviews. For the most part, reviews of the most frequently reviewed titles appeared in such journals as British Medical Journal, Annals of Internal Medicine, Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association, and New England Journal of Medicine. These five journals covered 93.53% of the 727 books reviewed more than once in 1970.

Biology↗
PubMed1995

Medical books: for information or learning? Reflections on the books of three Newfoundland physicians, c.1860 to c.1970.

This study describes the medical books of three physicians in rural Newfoundland who followed each other chronologically. Spanning the years c.1860 to c.1970, the nearly 300 books prompt a variety of questions about the physicians themselves, their practices, and their reading habits. These enquiries raise further questions about the extent to which medical books are read for factual information or for contemplating more general issues about the nature of disease and the nature of the individual.

Book Collecting↗
PubMed1974

Current status of biomedical book reviewing. II. Time lag in biomedical book reviewing.

This part of the study explores the effectiveness of the review media in terms of speed of reviewing, comprehensiveness of review treatment, and authority. The time lags for the fifty-four journals varied widely, the mean ranging from 5.8 months to forty-two months. The time lags for all 3,347 reviews varied even more widely, ranging from less than a month to 108 months after a book was off the press. The 3,347 reviews had a mean time lag of 10.43 months and a standard deviation of 6.63 months.

Book Reviews as Topic↗