Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “BLOOD UREA NITROGEN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[Study and application of blood urea nitrogen slide].

Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) Reaction Slide was studied and primarily applied in clinical laboratory as a method for BUN test it is ideal of emergency use. BUN Reaction slide is a dry chemical reagent pad, also it is a separation couple-seal system. The slide is divided into two chambers by a membrane, the up one is UN enzymatic reaction area, the bottom one is detector reaction part. This system eliminated interference from blood pH, Hb and bilirubin, only 5 minutes is needed for a single test. The test within day and day-to-day CVs were < 5.5%. Test linearity was up to 1000 mg/L. There was good correlation with BUN enzyme-couple method, r = 0.985, y = 0.91 X + 3.9. The acurrate was better than BUN Strip method.

Blood Chemical Analysis↗

An evaluation of the urograph method for blood urea nitrogen estimation.

Analysis of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) on 160 sera by Urograph and autoanalysis revealed excellent correlation if the results of the Urograph method were reported in one of three ranges: under 20 mg. %, between 20 and 50 mg. %, and over 50 mg. %. Because of the simplicity of the Urograph method, it is suggested that this procedure should be useful for night, weekend and emergency analyses, or possibly for mass screening of BUN levels where automated equipment is not available.

Autoanalysis↗

The determination of hemodialysis blood recirculation using blood urea nitrogen measurements.

The determination of blood recirculation using blood urea nitrogen (BUN) measurements in hemodialysis patients is a standard technique. The accuracy and reproducibility of these calculations have never been determined. Two pairs of recirculation studies (study A and study B) were performed in 13 patients during a single dialysis treatment. Blood samples were analyzed for BUN and recirculation was calculated. The first recirculation study (study A) was performed within 1 hour of the initiation of dialysis, with a duplicate test of recirculation performed within 15 minutes. In study B, the dialyzer blood lines were reversed in an attempt to enhance blood recirculation. After 15 minutes, duplicate tests of recirculation were again performed. Calculated recirculations before the line reversal (study A) ranged from -3.3% to 11.9% in the first test and -2.9% to 12.2% in the second test. In study A, there was no correlation (P > 0.05, r = 0.09) between the first and second calculated recirculations. In study B, an increase in recirculation was observed. Calculated recirculations ranged from 16.3% to 53.5% for the first test and 5.4% to 58.1% for the second test. A significant relationship was observed in the calculated recirculation in study B (P < 0.05, r = 0.81). The results from the present study show that the use of BUN measurements may not provide a consistent indicator of access recirculation in a patient with a low recirculation. This lack of consistency should be considered when determining further clinical treatment.

Adult↗

Blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine. Physiology and interpretations.

Any elevations in levels of blood urea nitrogen and/or serum creatinine do not necessarily indicate structural renal disease. Conversely, blood urea nitrogen or serum creatinine values, which appear to be within the range of normal, do not by themselves rule out significant reduction in glomerular filtration rate. Any interpretation of the blood levels of these two substances must be done with the awareness that a variety of extrarenal factors can affect them. The blood urea nitrogen to serum creatinine ratio can be a valuable tool in the determination or renal functional and structural integrity.

Aged↗

POSTMORTEM BLOOD SUGAR AND BLOOD UREA NITROGEN DETERMINATIONS.

Glucose and urea nitrogen determinations were made on blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples collected during 160 postmortem examinations in order to determine the usefulness of such tests in diagnosing diabetes and uremia at the time of autopsy. The results indicated that: (1) Blood is unsuitable for postmortem glucose determination, and no postmortem normal can be established. (2) Cerebrospinal fluid gave more uniform but very low glucose values. (3) Diabetics as a group had very high postmortem glucose levels but showed a marked overlap with non-diabetics. (4) Infants less than 3 months of age showed high postmortem glucose values. (5) Postmortem blood urea nitrogen and cerebrospinal fluid urea nitrogen levels were within normal limits in previously healthy persons who died suddenly from accidental causes. (6) Hospital autopsy cases had high urea nitrogen levels. (7) Postmortem urea nitrogen levels higher than 100 mg.% were indicative of uremia.

Autopsy↗

Elevated blood urea nitrogen level as a predictor of mortality in patients admitted for decompensated heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization for decompensated heart failure is associated with high mortality after discharge. In heart failure, renal function involves both cardiovascular and hemodynamic properties. We studied the relation between renal dysfunction and mortality in patients admitted for decompensated heart failure. METHODS: The prognostic importance of four measures of renal function-blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio, and estimated creatinine clearance-was evaluated in 541 patients (mean [+/- SD] age, 63 +/- 14 years; 377 men [70%]) with a previous diagnosis of heart failure (96% with New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms) who were admitted for clinical decompensation. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 343 +/- 185 days, 177 patients (33%) died. In multivariable Cox regression models, the risk of all-cause mortality increased with each quartile of blood urea nitrogen, with an adjusted relative risk of 2.3 in patients in the upper compared with the lower quartiles (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 4.1; P = 0.005). Creatinine and estimated creatinine clearance were not significant predictors of mortality after adjustment for other covariates. Blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio yielded similar prognostic information as blood urea nitrogen (adjusted relative risk = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.4 to 3.8; P = 0.0007 for patients in the upper compared with the lower quartiles). CONCLUSION: Blood urea nitrogen is a simple clinical variable that provides useful prognostic information in patients admitted for decompensated heart failure. In this setting, elevated blood urea nitrogen levels probably reflect the cumulative effects of hemodynamic and neurohormonal alterations that result in renal hypoperfusion.

Aged↗

Screening with blood urea nitrogen before intravenous contrast.

In some settings, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) values are available well in advance of creatinine values. We wanted to determine whether BUN values can be used to screen for renal insufficiency for the purpose of intravenous contrast administration. From laboratory records, we derived and validated cutpoints for BUN values to detect creatinine values >/=2.0 mg/dL. "Sensitive" and "high-yield" cutpoints were derived using records from 5000 consecutive patients and validated using a random set of 2000 patients. BUN >/=15 mg/dL, the "sensitive" cutpoint, had sensitivity of 0.997 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.987-1.0) and specificity of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.54-0.59). BUN >/=20 mg/dL, the "high-yield cutpoint," had sensitivity of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99) and specificity of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.73). Negative likelihood ratios for these cutpoints were 0.005 and 0.03, respectively. BUN values <15-20 mg/dL provide strong evidence against renal insufficiency.

Area Under Curve↗

Massive and disproportionate elevation of blood urea nitrogen in acute azotemia.

In renal failure, blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine usually rise in tandem; the normal BUN: Cr ratio is 10-15: 1. Disproportionate rises in BUN: Cr (> 20: 1) often imply pre-renal azotemia but may be caused by increased protein catabolism or an excessive protein load. In this study we looked at intensive care patients who acutely developed markedly increased BUN (> or = 100 mg/dL) with only modest elevation of Cr (< or = 5 mg/dL) for possible causes of the disproportionate azotemia. There were 19 such cases collected over 6 months, nine women and ten men, with mean age 69.2 +/- 4.4 years (13/19 > 75 years). Peak BUN was 156 +/- 11 mg/dL; peak Cr 4.3 +/- 0.5 mg/dL. Eleven patients expired. Mean serum albumin at the time of consultation was 2.7 +/- 0.2 g/dL; mean total lymphocyte count 1.0 +/- 0.1/mm3. Of possible factors causing the azotemia, nine patients had documented hypovolemia; eight had congestive heart failure; six were in septic or hypovolemic shock, and two received high-dose steroids. As contributing factors, eight patients had Salb < 2.5 g/dL; eight were given a high protein intake > 100 g/d; two had HIV, and two others had gastrointestinal bleeding. Infection was present in 14 patients; seven had sepsis (bacteremia with hypotension). All patients had at least one of these factors present and 16/19 had two or more. Fractional Na excretion was < 1% (consistent with pre-renal azotemia) in only four of the 11 patients in whom it was measured. We conclude that severely disproportionate BUN : Cr is frequently multifactorial and is most common in the elderly, perhaps due to their lower muscle mass, and in ICU patients given a high protein intake. It is often not indicative of uncomplicated renal hypoperfusion, although low renal perfusion (hypovolemia, shock, or heart failure) is common. Mortality is high due to the severe illnesses, especially infection, worsened by decreased renal function and hypercatabolic state.

Acute Disease↗