SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Autografts”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Skin cell suspension autograft as an evidence-based innovation in burn and wound treatment: A systematic review of global evidence across two decades.

BACKGROUND: Skin cell suspension autograft (SCSA) is a point-of-care approach to wound management facilitating epithelialization while reducing burden associated with conventional autografting. Despite growing clinical use of SCSA across diverse wound etiologies, the global clinical evidence describing its use has not yet been comprehensively synthesized. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies between January 2000 and December 2024 reporting clinical use of SCSA for wound closure. Data on patient demographics, wound characteristics, and treatment methods were extracted. Clinical, safety, and health economic outcomes were extracted for comparative studies evaluating SCSA against control treatments. RESULTS: Ninety-nine studies across 13 countries were included. Across the overall dataset, SCSA was used alone or in combination with autografting for burns, surgical wounds, traumatic injuries, inflammatory conditions, and chronic wounds. Among comparative studies (n=27), SCSA consistently reduced donor skin, and healing outcomes favored SCSA in 61%, while 39% reported equivalent outcomes. Pain and esthetic outcomes more frequently favored SCSA, while safety outcomes were generally similar, with some studies favoring comparators. Health-economic outcomes suggested potential reductions in length of stay and resource utilization, although findings were variable across studies. CONCLUSION: The available global evidence supports SCSA as a versatile modality for supporting epidermal coverage across wound types and clinical contexts. However, the findings should be interpreted in the context of the limitations of this review, which include heterogenous study designs, variable outcome reporting, predominance of non-randomized data, and the absence of a formal quantitative analysis. Nevertheless, the demonstrated clinical and economic benefits in comparative studies reinforce the role of SCSA as an evidence-based innovation for burn and wound treatment.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Preoperative Proximal Migration of the Radial Head as an Independent Predictor of Suboptimal Outcomes After Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation for Capitellar Osteochondritis Dissecans: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) is widely performed for capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD). However, preoperative predictors of suboptimal postoperative outcomes remain unclear. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The authors aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes after OAT for capitellar OCD and identify preoperative risk factors associated with suboptimal outcomes. They hypothesized that radiographic indicators of disease severity, including preoperative proximal migration of the radial head, lesion size, and lateral wall disruption, would be associated with suboptimal postoperative clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The records of adolescent athletes who underwent OAT for capitellar OCD with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes included elbow range of motion (ROM) and Timmerman-Andrews (T-A) score. A suboptimal outcome was defined as a postoperative T-A score <160. Preoperative radiographs were used to measure proximal migration of the radial head relative to the coronoid process, hypertrophy of the radial head, OCD lesion area, and a 5-grade lateral wall disruption classification; measurement reliability was assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of a suboptimal outcome, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff value for proximal migration. RESULTS: A total of 69 elbows (mean age, 13.6 years; mean follow-up, 48 months) were included. ROM and T-A scores improved significantly after OAT, and all athletes returned to any sports. Of these, 50 elbows (72%) achieved good outcomes, whereas 19 (28%) had suboptimal outcomes. Preoperative proximal migration was significantly greater in the suboptimal outcome group compared with the good outcome group (mean, 2.1 ± 2.3 vs 0.5 ± 1.7 mm; P = .002), as were lesion area (mean, 70 ± 16 vs 58 ± 20 mm2; P = .02) and lateral wall disruption grade (median, 5 vs 3; P = .01). On multivariate analysis, proximal migration of the radial head was the only independent predictor of a suboptimal outcome (adjusted OR, 1.47 per 1-mm increase; 95% CI, 1.03-2.09; P = .033). ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.72 with an optimal cutoff of 2.2 mm (sensitivity, 56%; specificity, 84%). CONCLUSION: OAT resulted in significant clinical improvement in adolescents with capitellar OCD; however, 28% of patients were classified as having suboptimal outcomes. Preoperative proximal migration of the radial head is an independent predictor of a suboptimal postoperative outcome. A value >2.2 mm may indicate advanced radiocapitellar incongruity, a condition in which OAT may be less effective.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Autologous bone grafts versus alloplastic implants for orbital floor reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The choice of reconstructive material for orbital floor fractures remains a subject of debate. While autologous bone has historically been considered the "gold standard," alloplastic implants offer potential advantages in reducing surgical morbidity. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of autologous bone grafts versus alloplastic implants in orbital floor reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251140583). Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to August 2025. Randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies evaluating functional outcomes (diplopia, enophthalmos) and complications (ectropion, infection, malposition) were included. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model, with risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated. RESULTS: Twenty studies comprising 2,119 patients were included. Alloplastic implants demonstrated statistically significant superiority in periocular safety, with a reduced risk of postoperative ectropion compared to autologous grafts (RR = 2.245; p = 0.020). In an exploratory sensitivity analysis excluding one outlier study, autologous grafts were associated with a significantly higher risk of implant malposition (RR = 2.074; p = 0.004). Autologous reconstruction was associated with a strong trend toward increased postoperative pain (p = 0.052) and inherent donor-site morbidity. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding infection (p = 0.402), enophthalmos (p = 0.201), or diplopia (p = 0.221). CONCLUSION: Alloplastic implants were associated with a lower risk of ectropion and implant malposition, with functional outcomes statistically comparable to autologous bone. Given the elimination of donor-site morbidity, alloplastic biomaterials represent a safe and effective alternative for orbital floor reconstruction; however, the predominance of retrospective, heterogeneous studies in the current evidence base means these findings should inform, rather than replace, individualized surgical decision-making pending further high-quality randomized trials.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Versus Prosthetic Grafts in the Repair of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) present a severe risk of progression to acute limb ischemia. Open surgery (OS) is the gold standard treatment; however, prosthetic grafts are acceptable in highly selected cases, especially when the great saphenous vein is not available. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing autologous versus prosthetic grafts for patency and limb preservation outcomes in patients with PAAs. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central were systematically searched from inception through October 2024. Outcomes were pooled using a frequentist random-effects model as odds ratios, mean differences, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on RStudio (Version 4.5.0). Risk-of-bias assessments were performed using ROBINS-I and MINORS. RESULTS: Twenty-two observational studies were pooled comprising 9,145 PAAs in 8,370 patients, of whom 6,434 (74.51%) were treated with autologous grafts and 2,200 (25.49%) with prosthetic grafts. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 86 months. Repair with autologous conduits significantly improved long-term primary patency (HR 3.93; P < 0.001), secondary patency (HR 6.02; P < 0.001), and long-term limb salvage (HR 2.69; P = 0.044) compared with prosthetic conduits. There were no significant differences in in-hospital amputation (P = 0.36), myocardial infarction (P = 0.61), mortality (P = 0.50), 2-year primary patency (P = 0.25), 5-year secondary patency (P = 0.06), or length of hospital stay (P = 0.95). Risk of bias was classified as moderate-to-high, reflecting confounding factors inherent to observational studies and moderate methodological quality by MINORS. Despite these limitations, treatment effects consistently favored autologous grafts in both short- and long-term analyses; however, caution is warranted given the limited number of available studies. CONCLUSION: The use of autologous conduits significantly favors both short-term and long-term efficacy and safety in the OS repair of PAAs. Given the limitations of the existing evidence, further comparative studies are needed.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Outcomes of Suture Tape-Augmented ACL Reconstruction in Patients With High Internal Rotational Tibial Subluxation: A Minimum 3-Year Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hamstring tendon (HT) autografts faces persistent challenges of graft failure, especially in patients with high internal rotational tibial subluxation (IRTS). HYPOTHESIS: Patients with high IRTS who undergo HT autograft ACLR with suture tape augmentation (STA) will have lower graft failure rates and superior clinical outcomes as compared with those without STA. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with high IRTS-defined as lateral minus medial anterior tibial subluxation >5.8 mm based on prior studies-who underwent primary ACLR using HT autografts with STA and had a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to identify a control group of patients with similarly high IRTS who underwent HT ACLR without STA. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale, as well as by return-to-sport status and graft failure. Clinically meaningful improvements were evaluated by the minimal clinically important difference, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, and substantial clinical benefit. RESULTS: This study included 62 patients with high IRTS: 31 with STA and 31 matched controls. The mean IRTS was 6.6 mm (range, 5.9-8.9) in the STA group and 6.8 mm (range, 5.8-8.7) in the control group. The mean patient age was 32.9 years (range, 20-50), and the mean follow-up was 3.8 years (range, 3.1-5.0). At final follow-up, the STA group showed significantly higher proportions of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (93.5% vs 74.2%; P = .038), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (96.8% vs 74.2%; P = .012), and substantial clinical benefit (54.8% vs 25.8%; P = .020). The return-to-sport rate was also higher in the STA group (74.2% vs 48.4%; P = .037). Additionally, the STA group demonstrated a lower graft failure rate (0% vs 12.9%; P = .039). CONCLUSION: For patients with high IRTS, STA in ACLR with HT autografts is associated with improved clinical outcomes, a higher return-to-sport rate, and a lower risk of graft failure at midterm follow-up.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Primary ACL Repair and Reconstruction in Isolated ACL Ruptures: Forgotten Joint Scores and the Association Between Residual Laxity and Joint Awareness.

BACKGROUND: Primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair has recently reemerged as a treatment option for carefully selected proximal ACL tears. However, evidence regarding patient-reported joint awareness and the relationship between postoperative laxity and joint awareness remains limited. PURPOSE: To compare joint awareness, clinical outcomes, and postoperative laxity between primary ACL repair and hamstring tendon autograft reconstruction in carefully selected patients with isolated ACL rupture, and to explore the association between residual laxity and postoperative joint awareness. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 85 patients with isolated ACL rupture treated with either primary ACL repair (n = 26) or hamstring autograft reconstruction (n = 59), with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner activity scale score, postoperative knee laxity, return to sport, and rerupture rates, were evaluated. The authors also used the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), a measure of joint awareness, to evaluate patients. A higher score reflects lower joint awareness, suggesting function more similar to a native knee. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate variables associated with postoperative FJS-12 values. RESULTS: No differences were observed between groups in postoperative Lysholm, IKDC, and Tegner activity scale scores; Lachman- and pivot-shift-assessed postoperative laxity; and return-to-sport rates. However, postoperative FJS-12 values were significantly higher in the repair group compared with the reconstruction group (87.0 ± 15.0 vs 77.5 ± 14.2; mean difference, 9.5 points [95% CI, 2.8-16.3]; P = .006), corresponding to a moderate effect size (Cohen d = 0.66). Secondary exploratory regression analyses demonstrated that residual postoperative laxity was associated with lower postoperative FJS-12 values in both Lachman- and pivot-shift-based models (R2 = 0.649 and 0.680, respectively; P < .001 for both). CONCLUSION: In carefully selected patients with proximal ACL tears and adequate tissue quality, no significant between-group differences were detected in conventional clinical outcomes, postoperative laxity, return-to-sport rates, or rerupture rates between primary ACL repair and reconstruction. Primary ACL repair was associated with higher postoperative FJS-12 values at short- to midterm follow-up, suggesting function more similar to that of a native knee. Residual postoperative laxity was associated with lower FJS-12 values in secondary exploratory analyses.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparison of posterior cellular bonegraft options for single-level lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Iliac bone autograft (IBG) is osteoinductive/osteogenic/osteoconductive but requires an additional harvesting procedure with known morbidities. Bone morphogenic protein (BMP) is osteoinductive and effective in obtaining fusion but is used off label for posterior fusion, has multiple side effects, and is expensive. Stem cell bone products, both auto- and allograft are attractive osteoinductive alternatives that avoid morbidity related to the graft donor site and may have a better safety profile than BMP. Morcelized allograft bone is osteoconductive but not osteoinductive or osteogenic. PURPOSE: Evaluate and compare the effectiveness of 6 types of viable or osteoinductive bone graft material in obtaining a solid posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for single level anterior/posterior lumbar spinal fusion. The bone grafts were IBG, BMP, autogenous stem cells (MSC) from concentrated bone marrow aspirate (BMA), allograft MSC from bone marrow, adipose tissue, or amniotic fluid, combined with inert cancellous allograft (Allo). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective, single-blinded randomized study of 6 cohorts and inert historical control. PATIENT SAMPLE: Elective anterior-posterior lumbar spinal fusion of 175 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments included pre and postoperative back and leg pain (VAS) scores, pain drawing, disability (ODI) scores, pain medication usage, and 1-year postoperative thin-cut CT scans (read by blinded radiologists). METHODS: Patients who were surgical candidates for a 1-level anterior/posterior lumbar fusion were randomized to 1 of 6 types of posterior bone graft alternatives: IBG, BMP, BMA, allograft MSC derived from bone marrow combined with morcelized Allo (cAlloBone), adipose derived MSC combined with morcelized Allo (cAlloFat), or amnion derived MSC combined with morcelized Allo (cAlloAm). Historical Allo patients served as a negative control group. Each group (n 27) had prospective outcomes and were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Fusion rate and outcomes were compared and referenced to Allo group. RESULTS: All but 5 patients had a solid ASF. The posterior fusion rates were 98% for IBG, 94% for BMP, 85% for BMA, 67% for cAlloBone, 64% for cAlloFat, 62% for cAlloAm, and 50% for Allo. Outcomes were significantly improved for all measures for all groups and there was no difference between groups except cAlloFat had slightly greater improvement in back pain in the 7-12 month follow-up period. BMP was the most expensive graft material; cellular allografts had a high-cost relative to fusion rate. CONCLUSIONS: For single level ASF/PSF, the PSF fusion rate was significantly greater for IBG and BMP followed by BMA. Various allograft MSC bone graft options resulted in lower fusion rates but may be greater than Allo. Outcomes were uniformly improved regardless of the type of graft used or the fusion status of the posterior fusion as long as the interbody fusion was solid. If bone graft cost savings is a consideration for PSF, then IBG has the greatest radiographic value, and Allo the greatest clinical value as long as the anterior interbody fusion is solid.

Humans↗