Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Astemizole”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1991

Onset of action of astemizole.

Astemizole has been described to have a slow onset of action and this has to a large extent been attributed to its unusual pharmacokinetic profile. Yet, pharmacokinetically, there are no reasons why astemizole should not act within the first hours after intake, since plasma levels of unchanged astemizole are maximal within 40 min and there is fast tissue distribution. Animal pharmacology data show effective antihistamine activity with astemizole within 1 h after intake. Clinical data referring to the onset of action of astemizole with regard to symptom relief were available from 27 studies on over 7000 patients. These studies showed astemizole to provide symptom relief within 4 to 6 h of intake in 16-85% of patients, and within 24 h in 42-90% of patients; these figures are comparable to those reported for other new antihistamines. Comparative studies between astemizole and other new antihistamines (terfenadine, loratadine and cetirizine) indicated no or only minor differences in onset of clinical effect. Two recent studies compared astemizole to both terfenadine and loratadine under well-controlled circumstances. One was a pollen challenge study showing all three drugs to be able to reverse the challenge-induced effects within 1-3 h after intake. In the other, the mean time to relief of at least one rhinitis symptom was assessed as 18 min for astemizole, 24 min for terfenadine and 36 min for loratadine. Compared with the systemic decongestant pseudoephedrine, time to first relief of symptoms was similar for astemizole (4 h) and pseudoephedrine (3.5 h). Controlled clinical trials thus show astemizole to provide fast symptom relief. This was confirmed in patient surveys in Canada and Switzerland: over 80% of patients were very satisfied with astemizole and experienced onset of action within hours. In conclusion, astemizole results in symptom relief within hours after its administration. Its onset of action is not different from that of other nonsedating antihistamines and is also similar to that of pseudoephedrine.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A study of the interaction between dirithromycin and astemizole in healthy adults.

The effect of a standard regimen of dirithromycin, a macrolide antibiotic, on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of the H (1) receptor blocker astemizole was evaluated in a sample of 18 healthy young adults (nine males and nine females). The study was conducted in a two-way cross-over fashion after the subjects had been randomly given either dirithromycin (two 250 mg tablets) or placebo (two tablets) every morning for 10 days. On the morning of the fourth dose of either dirithromycin or placebo each subject ingested a single 30-mg oral dose (three 10-mg tablets) of astemizole. The disposition kinetics of both astemizole and its major metabolite, N-desmethylastemizole, were characterized after measuring the concentrations of both analytes in the serum fraction of serial blood samples collected for 14 days after the astemizole dose. In addition, corrected QT (QT(c) ) intervals were estimated from electrocardiogram rhythm strips that were run 24 hours prior to the astemizole dose, 12 hours after the astemizole dose, and after the last treatment (dirithromycin or placebo) dose in both study periods. Pharmacokinetic parameters that were measured for both astemizole and N-desmethylastemizole during each treatment were: C(max), t(max), AUC (0-infinity), CL(oral), half-life, and volume of distribution (V). None of the parameters for N-desmethylastemizole was different when comparing data by ANOVA from the dirithromycin treatment period with that of the placebo treatment period. On the other hand, during dirithromycin treatment astemizole CL(oral) was 34% slower, volume of distribution was 24% larger, and half-life was 84% longer. Generally, all QT ( c ) intervals did not appear to be affected by dirithromycin treatment. The changes in astemizole kinetics could not be attributed to its N-demethylation since the dispositional kinetics of N-desmethylastemizole were unaffected by dirithromycin. Therefore, it is difficult to ascertain the clinical significance of the changes in astemizole kinetics. Since there were no significant differences for mean QT(c) intervals and no effect of dirithromycin treatment on N-desmethylastemizole kinetics, it is unlikely that a standard regimen of dirithromycin would place a patient taking astemizole at an increased risk of torsade de pointes or related ventricular arrhythmias.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Influence of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic effects of astemizole.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of chronic itraconazole treatment on the pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of single dose astemizole in healthy subjects was studied. METHODS: Twelve male volunteers were taking orally 200 mg twice daily itraconazole or placebo for 14 days with a washout period of 4 weeks in between. Approximately 2 h after the morning dose of itraconazole or placebo on day 11, 10 mg astemizole was orally administered. The plasma concentrations of astemizole and desmethylastemizole were measured by radioimmunoassay up to 504 h after administration; electrocardiograms with analysis of the QTc interval were recorded up to 24 h post administration. RESULTS: Itraconazole treatment did not significantly change the peak concentration of astemizole (0.74 vs 0.81 ng ml-1) but it increased the area under the curve from 0 to 24 h (5.46 to 9.95 ng ml-1 h) and from 0 to infinity (17.4 to 48.2 ng ml-1 h), and the elimination half-life (2.1 to 3.6 days). The systemic bioavailability of desmethylastemizole was also increased. The QTc interval did not increase after astemizole administration and there was no difference in the QTc intervals between the itraconazole and placebo session. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic administration of itraconazole influences the metabolism of single dose astemizole in normal volunteers without changes of cardiac repolarization during the first 24 h after astemizole administration. However, the reduction in astemizole clearance under concomitant administration of itraconazole may result in a marked increase in astemizole plasma concentrations and QTc alterations during chronic combined intake of astemizole with itraconazole.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1994

The effect of activated charcoal on the absorption and elimination of astemizole.

1. The effect of activated charcoal on the absorption and elimination of astemizole and its metabolites was studied in healthy volunteers. 2. Subjects were divided into three groups containing seven subjects each. One group received 30 mg of astemizole with water only (control) and another group with 25 g of activated charcoal. The third group received multiple doses (12 g) of charcoal from 6 h onwards twice daily for 8 days. The concentrations of astemizole and its metabolites in plasma were measured by radioimmunoassay for 192 h. 3. Activated charcoal, administered immediately after astemizole ingestion, reduced the absorption of astemizole by 85% (P < 0.001). Multiple doses of activated charcoal, administered throughout the period of astemizole elimination, had no significant effect on the rate of elimination or the area under the curve from 0 to 192 h. 4. The absorption of astemizole from the gastrointestinal tract can be effectively prevented with activated charcoal. Because astemizole is rapidly absorbed, charcoal should be administered as soon as possible in acute astemizole poisoning. Multiple doses of charcoal do not seem to shorten the elimination half-life of astemizole.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Effects of nonsedating antihistamine, astemizole, on the in situ canine heart assessed by cardiohemodynamic and monophasic action potential monitoring.

The possible mechanisms of cardiac adverse effects of astemizole were studied using a halothane-anesthetized in vivo canine model under the cardiohemodynamic and monophasic action potential monitoring. A dose of 0.3 mg/kg of iv astemizole (n = 7), which is close to the recommended dose for clinical use, showed a bradycardic effect and a reversed use-dependent lengthening of repolarization. The increase in the repolarization was greater than in the effective refractory period. These effects persisted even when the plasma drug concentration became undetectable. Additional administration of 3.0 mg/kg of iv astemizole (n = 7) decreased the mean blood pressure, suppressed the cardiac contraction and conduction, and induced early after depolarization-like potential in addition to the qualitatively similar effects compared to those observed by the lower dose. The decrease of the plasma concentration of astemizole followed the pattern predicted by the two-compartment theory of pharmacokinetics, but the drug concentration in the cardiac muscle was estimated to be more than 100 times greater than that in plasma. Our study emphasizes that each cardiac consequence of astemizole overdose may be related to proarrhythmic effects and the monitoring of plasma drug concentration will be less helpful in predicting the cardiac adverse effects of astemizole. The results provide some insights into the clinical cardiotoxicity of astemizole. Drugs or interventions inducing positive chronotropic, inotropic, and dromotropic effects can become good candidates for the treatment of astemizole intoxication, which may attenuate the cardiac effects of astemizole including the lengthening of repolarization.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1987

Uptake, subcellular distribution and biotransformation of 3H-labelled astemizole in cultured rat hepatocytes.

When incubated with 3H-astemizole, a potent antagonist of H1 receptor, cultured rat hepatocytes, which do not express specific receptors for this ligand, avidly take up 3H-label proportionally to the drug concentration. HPLC analysis indicates that at 10 ng 3H-astemizole/ml, cells almost entirely deplete the culture medium of the drug within 4 hr of incubation. At 37 degrees, astemizole is metabolized and released into the culture medium mainly under the form of glucuronoconjugated metabolites. Differential centrifugation of homogenates from hepatocytes incubated with 3H-astemizole indicates that astemizole and unconjugated metabolites are found in the particulate fraction, whereas astemizole and conjugated metabolites are present in the cytosol. Isopycnic centrifugation on sucrose gradient shows that the major part of the 3H-label in the particulate fraction distributes like phospholipids and NADPH cytochrome c reductase, suggesting an association with membranes and, in particular, with the endoplasmic reticulum. Chloroquine, a drug accumulating within lysosomes and acidic endosomes, decreases the uptake of 3H-astemizole by hepatocytes and induces, during isopycnic centrifugation of a particulate fraction, a shift of the 3H-label towards lower densities where it closely accompanies cathepsin B. This suggests that a minor part of astemizole accumulated in the hepatocytes could be trapped within lysosomes. These results could support the hypothesis that aspecific binding of astemizole to cellular membranes and, to a lesser extent, trapping in lysosomes could play a role in the pharmacokinetics of the drug.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Tilarin in combination with astemizole.

This multicentre double-blind, placebo controlled study had a practical objective, based on the expectation that many patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis will be prescribed oral antihistamine monotherapy by their primary care physician, whereas allergy specialists are more likely to prescribe combination therapy including antiinflammatories. The specific question was, "Will the addition of nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray to astemizole tablets improve control of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis induced by ragweed pollen, as compared to astemizole therapy alone?'. Following a one-week baseline, planned to coincide with the start of the local ragweed pollen season, patients (aged 12-64) were randomly assigned to four weeks' double-blind test treatment with either nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray four times daily (QID) + astemizole (n = 146) or placebo nasal spray + astemizole (n = 148) or double-dummy (nasal spray + capsules) placebo (n = 71). Patient diary cards were kept throughout the five weeks, and clinic visits were made before and after baseline and after one and four weeks' treatment. During the 10-day peak pollen period, the diary card rhinitis symptom summary score (0-4 severity scale) was significantly reduced in patients receiving either astemizole alone (p < 0.001) or the combination therapy (p < 0.001) as compared with placebo. Direct comparison of the active treatments further showed that symptoms were significantly less severe (p < 0.01) with the combined therapy than with astemizole alone, and this despite significantly greater reliance on permitted rescue medications (p < 0.05 for pseudoephedrine usage) in the astemizole group. Clinical assessments of rhinitis made during the peak pollen visit, after the first week of test treatment, were also significantly (p < 0.05 - p < 0.01) in favour of combined therapy with nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray + astemizole rather than astemizole alone, and at the same time this preference was confirmed by physician (p = 0.011) and patient (p = 0.003) opinions of symptom control. In conclusion, this antiinflammatory + antihistamine treatment proved superior to antihistamine alone for effective management of allergic rhinitis. The combined therapy worked quickly and was well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events or untoward effects on blood or urine variables.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1999

Block of HERG potassium channels by the antihistamine astemizole and its metabolites desmethylastemizole and norastemizole.

INTRODUCTION: The selective H1-receptor antagonist astemizole (Hismanal) causes acquired long QT syndrome. Astemizole blocks the rapidly activating delayed rectifier K+ current I(Kr) and the human ether-a go-go-related gene (HERG) K+ channels that underlie it. Astemizole also is rapidly metabolized. The principal metabolite is desmethylastemizole, which retains H1-receptor antagonist properties, has a long elimination time of 9 to 13 days, and its steady-state serum concentration exceeds that of astemizole by more than 30-fold. A second metabolite is norastemizole, which appears in serum in low concentrations following astemizole ingestion and has undergone development as a new antihistamine drug. Our objective in the present work was to study the effects of desmethylastemizole, norastemizole, and astemizole on HERG K+ channels. METHODS AND RESULTS: HERG channels were expressed in a mammalian (HEK 293) cell line and studied using the patch clamp technique. Desmethylastemizole and astemizole blocked HERG current with similar concentration dependence (half-maximal block of 1.0 and 0.9 nM, respectively) and block was use dependent. Norastemizole also blocked HERG current; however, block was incomplete and required higher drug concentrations (half-maximal block of 27.7 nM). CONCLUSIONS: Desmethylastemizole and astemizole cause equipotent block of HERG channels, and these are among the most potent HERG channel antagonists yet studied. Because desmethylastemizole becomes the dominant compound in serum, these findings support the postulate that it becomes the principal cause of long QT syndrome observed in patients following astemizole ingestion. Norastemizole block of HERG channels is weaker; thus, the risk of producing ventricular arrhythmias may be lower. These findings underscore the potential roles of some H1-receptor antagonist metabolites as K+ channel antagonists.

Astemizole↗
PubMed1992

Pharmacokinetics of astemizole in children.

Astemizole is often administered to children in the treatment of rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria with good efficacy and few side effects. Both astemizole and its major metabolite desmethylastemizole (DMA) are clinically effective without annoying side effects such as sedation. The pharmacokinetics in adults is well known. In three different studies we have investigated the pharmacokinetical properties of the drug in children. Study I (absorption): Thirty-eight children 8-16 years old (mean 12.6 years) and weighing 25-80 kg (mean 45 kg), with rhinoconjunctivitis due to birch pollinosis, were pretreated with either astemizole 5 mg daily or placebo for two weeks. Then, all children were treated with astemizole in doses increasing every week, i.e. 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg per day. There was a good correlation between the given dose per kg body weight and the plasma concentration of astemizole plus hydroxylated metabolites, indicating that astemizole is completely absorbed. Study II (time to reach steady state): A group of 21 children 7-18 years old (mean 13.9 years), plus 2 younger children, 2 and 5 years old, with allergy against birch- or grass pollen were treated with astemizole 10 mg daily for 12 weeks. Astemizole had reached steady-state plasma levels when the first sample was taken after 1 week, DMA reached steady state within 4 weeks. Study III (elimination half-life [t1/2 beta]): In 10 of the children from study II, t1/2 beta for astemizole plus DMA could be calculated (two samples) and was 10.8 days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1986

The treatment of mild to severe chronic idiopathic urticaria with astemizole: double-blind and open trials.

Astemizole is a new H1 histamine-receptor antagonist that has a long elimination half-life and high H1-receptor affinity. This double-blind study evaluated the safety and efficacy of astemizole in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria (more than or equal to 3 months). Seventeen male and 34 female adult patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria entered the 2-month study. After a 48- to 72-hour washout, half the subjects were prerandomized to receive astemizole (10 mg), and the other half received placebo. Placebo-treated patients who were unable to complete the full 8 weeks because of uncontrolled chronic urticaria symptoms were entered into a 2-month open astemizole trial. Treatment with astemizole, as measured at the end point of each patient's treatment and compared to placebo, resulted in significant improvement of pruritus, erythema, number of wheals, frequency of urticarial attacks, and control of urticaria (p less than or equal to 0.03). The overall response to astemizole was significantly better than for placebo, according to both the investigator's and the patient's global evaluations (p less than 0.01) and as indicated by dropouts caused by treatment failure with placebo (p = 0.005). Six of 26 (24%) of the placebo-treated patients in the double-blind study had good to excellent results on the basis of global assessments. Thirteen of 16 patients with placebo-treatment failures who received astemizole in the open trial improved significantly from baseline symptoms of pruritus, erythema, and number of wheals (p less than or equal to 0.05). No significant side effects were reported except mild sedation in three astemizole-treated subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Effects of magnesium sulfate on the canine cardiovascular system complicating astemizole overdose.

Polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias induced by astemizole overdose have been reported to be successfully managed with intravenous magnesium sulfate. This study was designed to assess the effects of magnesium sulfate on the cardiovascular system, complicating astemizole overdose, the better to understand the therapeutic utility and undesirable effects of magnesium sulfate. Beagle dogs were anesthetized with halothane inhalation (n = 6). Monophasic action potential of the right ventricle, electrocardiogram, and systemic and left ventricular pressure were continuously monitored. Cardiac output was measured by a thermodilution method. Effective refractory period of the right ventricle was assessed by programmed electrical stimulation. An intentionally high dose of astemizole (3 mg/kg, i.v.) prolonged the repolarization and refractory period, while it decreased the sinus automaticity, ventricular contraction, and conduction. A canine antiarrhythmic dose of magnesium sulfate (100 mg/kg, i.v.) was additionally injected 1 h after i.v. astemizole. Magnesium sulfate increased the atrioventricular conduction time, electrical vulnerability, and preload of the left ventricle, while it decreased the blood pressure and cardiac output, besides the effects similar to those observed after i.v. astemizole. The plasma concentration of astemizole was at least 10 times higher than its therapeutic concentration during the experimental period. Magnesium sulfate could be expected to act as a calcium channel blocker during astemizole overdose; however, it may not antagonize the proarrhythmic effects of astemizole.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Effects of astemizole on ventricular activation, effective refractory periods, RT intervals, and programmed stimulation-induced ventricular arrhythmias in dog hearts with myocardial infarction.

To clarify the mechanisms of enhanced cardiotoxic effects of astemizole in ischemic hearts, we examined the effects of astemizole on ventricular activation, effective refractory periods (ERPs), RT intervals, and incidence of programmed electrical stimulation (PES)-induced ventricular arrhythmias in the dog heart after myocardial infarction. Myocardial infarction was produced by the two-stage ligation of left anterior descending coronary artery in dogs. At 7 days after ligation, bipolar electrodes were sutured on the ventricular surface of the infarcted and the normal zones for applying an electrical stimulation or recording the ventricular activation. Ventricular-activation delay was measured in a premature excitation, which was produced by a stimulation at a coupling interval between 300 and 140 ms on the ventricular surface of the normal zone. The ERP and the RT interval were determined during atrial pacing. The ventricular-activation delay increased after astemizole at doses of 0.3-3 mg/kg in the infarcted zone and at 3 mg/kg in the normal zone. Astemizole at doses of 0.3-3 mg/kg significantly prolonged the ERP to a greater extent in the infarcted zone than in the normal zone, and thus a dispersion of ERP between normal and infarcted zones increased. The RT interval in the normal zone significantly increased after astemizole to a greater extent at a long coupling interval. The RT interval in the infarcted zone also increased after astemizole at doses of 0.1-3 mg/kg to a greater extent than that in the normal zone. Astemizole at doses of 0.3-3 mg/kg increased the incidence of PES-induced ventricular arrhythmias. In conclusion, enhanced cardiotoxic effects of astemizole in ischemic hearts may be caused by increased activation delay in the ischemic regions and increased ERP dispersion in the ventricle.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Effects of the anti-allergics astemizole and norastemizole on Fc epsilon RI receptor-mediated signal transduction processes.

The non-sedating anti-allergic drug astemizole, apart from its potential to antagonise H1 receptors, inhibits the release of inflammation mediators from mast cells. To study the mechanism of this inhibition, we investigated the effects of astemizole and one of its active metabolites, norastemizole, on different phases of Fc epsilon RI (the high affinity receptor for the immunoglobulin IgE) receptor-activated signal transduction in rat basophilic leukemia cells (RBL-2H3), leading to exocytosis. Cells were stimulated either through antigen, or thapsigargin, or synergistic combinations of Fc epsilon RI receptor activation with either adenosine A3 receptors or integrins, activated by fibronectin adherence. The effects of the drugs on mediator release, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate formation, tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins and Ca2+ fluxes were investigated. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate levels are not affected. Astemizole increased tyrosine phosphorylation in resting cells, especially a 96-kDa protein band. Particularly tyrosine phosphorylation related to post Ca2+ processes is changed after cell triggering in the presence of astemizole. Both drugs inhibit the influx of 45Ca2+, with similar dose response curves as for the inhibition of exocytosis. Astemizole but not norastemizole, when used in resting cells, released Ca2+ from intracellular stores. Astemizole (> 15 microM) also induced exocytosis in resting cells. It did not induce additional changes in its inhibiting effect when cells were triggered with synergistic combinations of Fc epsilon RI receptor activation with either adenosine A3 receptors or integrins. Effects on haemolysis of erythrocytes and differential scanning calorimetry in liposomes showed clear differences in membrane perturbation between astemizole and norastemizole. The observed differences, and the role of membrane perturbation in the action on Ca2+ fluxes, are discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of triamcinolone acetonide nasal inhaler with astemizole in the treatment of ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Few clinical trials have directly compared the efficacy of antihistamines with topical nasal corticosteroids. OBJECTIVE: The study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray at a dose of 110 micro g in each nostril once daily with 10 mg of oral astemizole once daily for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in 239 patients who were randomized to receive either triamcinolone acetonide or astemizole. A 5-day, drug-free, lead-in period was followed by 4 weeks of double-blind treatment. One hundred four patients treated with triamcinolone acetonide and 105 patients treated with astemizole could be evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, triamcinolone acetonide was more effective than astemizole in reducing total nasal symptoms, nasal stuffiness, nasal itching, and sneezing (p </= 0.01). Triamcinolone acetonide was superior to astemizole at weeks 1, 2, and 3 in reduction of the total nasal symptom score (p </= 0.0401) and in reduction of nasal stuffiness (p </= 0.05). Improvements in individual nasal symptoms (itching, postnasal drip, runny nose, and sneezing) were greater for triamcinolone acetonide at week 2 (p </= 0.01). Ocular symptoms improved from baseline in both groups. When pollen counts were correlated to mean nasal rhinitis scores, the triamcinolone acetonide group showed continued improvement from week 1 to week 2 in nasal symptoms when pollen counts were at their highest. During the same period, patients treated with astemizole failed to show improvement from week 1 to week 2. This study demonstrated that once daily administration of triamcinolone acetonide was more effective than astemizole for controlling nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis, especially during the peak pollination period.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of efficacy, safety, and skin test inhibition of cetirizine and astemizole.

BACKGROUND: Astemizole, an H1-histamine-receptor antagonist prescribed for seasonal allergic rhinitis, has a slow onset of action and a strong suppressive effect on the wheal and flare reaction, which interferes with skin testing results. The newer antihistamine cetirizine appears to have a rapid onset of action and a low potential to interfere with posttreatment skin testing results. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and skin test inhibition of astemizole and cetirizine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: In a double-blind, parallel-group study conducted at six sites during ragweed pollination season, 263 subjects were randomized to receive 10 mg of astemizole, 5 mg of cetirizine, or 10 mg of cetirizine daily for 2 weeks. The subjects rated seven allergic rhinitis symptoms daily, the subjects and investigators provided global assessments of the responses to the treatments, and the subjects rated their satisfaction with the treatments. Thirty-nine subjects at one study site underwent quantitative skin testing before and after treatment. RESULTS: As measured by reduction from baseline in total symptom severity score, which was the primary efficacy measure in the study, all three treatments significantly relieved the symptoms of allergic rhinitis (P less than .05). This finding was supported by the global ratings and the subject satisfaction ratings. There were no significant differences among the three treatments for reduction from baseline in total symptom severity score. The mean subject satisfaction score with 10 mg of cetirizine was significantly greater than that with astemizole (P less than .05). In the skin tests performed 3, 7, and 14 days after the end of antihistamine treatment, the subjects who had received the cetirizine doses had significantly greater mean sum of wheal and mean sum of erythema values than those who had received the astemizole dose (P less than .05). Sensitivity to ragweed pollen extract returned to 90% of baseline within three days of the end of cetirizine treatment. Both drugs were well tolerated and their adverse event profiles were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Astemizole and cetirizine are effective and well tolerated in alleviating the symptoms of ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis. Cetirizine inhibits skin test results to a much lesser extent than does astemizole. Physicians may wish to consider the potential for skin test inhibition when selecting an antihistamine for patients with allergic rhinitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Onset of action and efficacy of terfenadine, astemizole, cetirizine, and loratadine for the relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Terfenadine, astemizole, cetirizine, and loratadine are compared in their abilities to produce relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the onset of action and efficacy of the study medications. METHODS: 111 ragweed-sensitive subjects were primed with pollen in the Environmental Exposure Unit. Study entry required adequate symptoms over a 3 hour exposure to 5000 +/- 300 grains/m3 of ragweed pollen. On the test day, subjects were given a single dose of either terfenadine 60 mg (22), astemizole 10 mg (22), cetirizine 10 mg (23), loratadine 10 mg (22), or placebo (22) when sufficiently symptomatic after a 60-minute exposure. Allergen levels were maintained and symptoms recorded every 30 minutes. RESULTS: Proportions of subjects with clinically important relief were cetirizine, 69.6%; terfenadine, 54.5%; loratadine, 50.0%; astemizole, 40.9%; and placebo, 31.8% but differences weren't significant between treatment groups (P = .119). Survival curves for times to onset of clinically important relief for the four treatment groups were not different (P = .119). Subjects realizing definitive relief were cetirizine, 65.2%; terfenadine, 45.5%; loratadine, 31.8%; placebo, 27.3%; and astemizole, 22.7% (P = .023). Survival analysis of onset time for definitive relief found significant differences (P = .010). The ranking was cetirizine --> terfenadine --> loratadine --> astemizole (quickest to slowest). Global evaluation based on subject willingness to take the medication again yielded percentages: cetirizine, 82.6%; terfenadine, 66.7%; astemizole, 63.6%; loratadine, 40.9%; and placebo, 36.4% (P = .036). CONCLUSION: Cetirizine and terfenadine continuously ranked higher in terms of onset of action and efficacy, while loratadine and astemizole ranked lower. Significance was detected in definitive relief and relative efficacy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Electrophysiological and arrhythmogenic effects of the histamine type 1-receptor antagonist astemizole on rabbit Purkinje fibers: clinical relevance.

Astemizole is a potent histamine H1-antagonist that has been associated with cases of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias, including torsade de pointes and atrioventricular (AV) block. However, its effects on cardiac action potential (AP) has not been described. We examined the electrophysiological effects of astemizole on rabbit Purkinje fibers using conventional glass microelectrodes in parallel with the effects of the widely used histamine H2-antagonist cimetidine, selected because it has no known cardiac arrhythmic toxicity. Astemizole (0.01-3 microM) exerted a concentration-dependent prolonging effect on final repolarization that did not reach steady state after 3 h of exposure. This effect was more pronounced at low stimulation frequency and was less marked at high stimulation frequency. In addition, early afterdepolarizations (EADs) occurred in one third of the fibers. Increasing extracellular concentration of KCl (2.7-5.4 mM) or MgCl2 (1-5 mM) suppressed EADs and reversed the prolonging effect that was conversely exaggerated by decreasing KCl (4-2.7 mM) or MgCl2 (1-0.5 mM) concentration. At higher concentrations (3-30 microM), astemizole induced an increasing depressant effect on the maximal rate of depolarization (Vmax) that became more pronounced with high stimulation frequency. All parameters were strongly depressed at 10 microM astemizole, leading to cellular inexcitability in 5 of 12 fibers when exposed to 30 microM astemizole. In comparison, cimetidine induced minor changes on AP characteristics, i.e., a prolongation in plateau duration at high (30-100 microM) concentrations. These results provide evidence that astemizole exerts quinidine-like effects on cardiac APs that are compatible with the occurrence of the clinically observed arrhythmias.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1990

Antiallergic effects of astemizole on immediate type hypersensitivity reactions.

Astemizole (0.5-5 mg/kg, p.o.) dose-dependently inhibited heterologous and homologous PCA reactions in rats at ID50 values of 1.48 mg/kg and 2.37 mg/kg, respectively. The inhibitory effect of astemizole on heterologous PCA was most remarkable when this compound was given p.o. 2 h prior to antigen challenge. Astemizole (0.1-5 mg/kg, p.o.) dose-dependently inhibited experimentally-induced asthma in guinea pigs at an ID50 of 0.86 mg/kg. Ex vivo, astemizole (0.5-5 mg/kg, p.o.) inhibited antigen-induced histamine release from lung pieces of sensitized guinea pigs. In in vitro experiments, the drug dose-dependently inhibited antigen-induced histamine and SRS-A releases from guinea pig lung pieces at concentrations of 0.05-10 microM. Furthermore, astemizole (0.1-10 microM) inhibited the histamine release induced by compound 48/80 and antigen-antibody reaction from rat peritoneal mast cells, and at 0.1-500 nM inhibited both leukotriene C4- and platelet-activating factor (PAF)-induced contraction of isolated guinea pig trachea at submicromolar concentrations. Astemizole not only inhibited 45Ca uptake into rat mast cells but also prevented the Ca2+ release from the intracellular Ca store induced by compound 48/80, although this compound did not affect the histamine release from permeabilized mast cells induced by Ca2+. Our results suggest that one of the antiallergic mechanisms of astemizole may be an inhibition of signal transduction from the mast cell membrane to the intracellular systems.

Airway Resistance↗