Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Animals, Poisonous”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Detection of anticoagulant residues by a new HPLC method in specimens of poisoned animals and a poison control case study.

Poisonings of domestic and wildlife animals are frequently caused by anticoagulants. Between 1996 and 2003, 70% of all suspected animal poisoning cases were confirmed in this laboratory following analysis of a variety of specimens. Thirty-nine percent of all animal poisonings detected in this laboratory were caused by anticoagulants. Suspicious veterinarians and pet owners involved with animal poisonings ask for toxicological analyses. With respect to these demands, a new high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method (system-I, reversed-phase C-18 column, methanol/ammonium acetate) combined with specific extraction procedures was developed for the sensitive detection of nine substances with anticoagulative properties. This method yields high recoveries of the analytes, which can simultaneously be detected. In addition, another HPLC (system-II, acetonitrile/potassium phosphate) was used to confirm and separate chromatographic peaks, which could not be resolved by HPLC system-I. The reliable method has good reproducibility and is most suitable for forensic analyses. Using these analytical procedures, concentrations of eight organic anticoagulants were determined in more than 100 aliquots of animal liver, blood, bait, gastric content, bloody intestinal content, and water. Over the last eight years, dogs and wild birds were the most frequently poisoned species. Interestingly, lethally poisoned birds had lower anticoagulant residues in their organs than mammals.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Case reports of lead poisoning in dogs from the National Animal Poison Control Center and the Centre National D'Informations Toxicologiques, Veterinaires: anecdotes or reality?

This paper presents case reports of lead toxicoses from 2 major animal poison control centers in Europe and North America, gathered from 1985 through 1989. All results examined here involved cases assessed as "toxicosis" or "suspected toxicosis" by the National Animal Poison Control Center (NAPCC) or the Centre National d'Informations Toxicologiques Veterinaries (CNITV). 537 cases were reported to the NAPCC, most of them concerning dogs (59%). In France, most of the 362 cases involved cattle (57.2%). There was an increased number of cases reported during late summer and early fall, and a decreased number of cases in November and December, in both centers. Dogs intoxicated were predominantly young animals (60% were less than 2 years old). No sex difference was noted. Pure bred dogs appeared more often involved than mixed-breed ones, but the breed distribution closely resembles dog breed distribution in the US. The source of lead was usually unknown and, when information was available, paint seemed to be the most common cause of poisoning. Clinical signs reported to the animal poison control centers involved the CNS and GI tract. Results from the French and the American database showed similar trends. They are compared to data from veterinary clinics and veterinary colleges in the US and Australia. In each case, data are very similar to what was reported to the CNITV and the NAPCC. It is concluded that animal poison control centers databases can provide a useful tool for better knowledge of animal poisoning. They can also help identify unexpected toxicologic problems related to drug administration or pesticide use.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2004

Patterns of animal poisonings reported to the Texas Poison Center Network: 1998-2002.

A portion of calls handled by poison centers involve poisonings of animals; however, information on such calls is limited. This study used data from poison centers in Texas collected during 1998-2002 to document the epidemiology of animal poisoning calls. There were a total of 24,467 animal poisoning calls, representing 2.0% of all calls. Dogs were affected in 87% of the calls and cats in 11%. The exposures were unintentional in 99% of the cases, occurred via ingestion in 95% and involved dermal exposure in 5% of the cases. Exposures occurred at the owner's own residence 91% of the time and were handled outside of health care facilities 61% of the time. The outcome involved no clinical effect for 60% of the cases involving dogs and 39% of the cases involving cats. Reported exposures occurred more often during the summer, and the most frequently reported exposures involved pesticides and plants. These findings were consistent with the limited reports from on poison center regarding animal poisonings.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

[Poisonous animals registration in Poland].

The Act on Nature Conservation of 16.04.2004 (Official Journal, 2004, No 92, item 880) imposes on private individuals the duty to register some animals. The data collected by Kraków municipal authorities and delivered to the Poison Information Centre (Colleglum Medicum, Jagiellonian University) indicate that there are following species in private hands in the city and its surroundings: 11 individuals of Naja naja, 2--Hydrodynates gigas and 55-- Dendrobates spp. According to these information the employees of the PIC elaborated the advice on the treatment of specific animals' poisoning. In the period May 2003 - May 2004 (before the above Act came into force) there were 143 individuals from Brachypelma genus and 3 scorpions (Pandinus imperator) registered in Krakow. These species produce venoms which take local effect. According to art. 64 (1) of the above Act it is compulsory to register amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. However, it would be desirable to introduce the duty to register also dangerous species of invertebrates and fishes. It would provide the complete list of poisonous animals kept in private hands. Thus, it would be possible to estimate any possible threats and to elaborate adequate treatment in case of specific animals' poisoning.

Animal Husbandry↗
PubMed2000

GC/MS/MS detection of pyrrolic metabolites in animals poisoned with the pyrrolizidine alkaloid riddelliine.

Pyrrolic metabolites from pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) were detected in liver and dried blood samples using a gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS) selected product-ion-monitoring method. A calibration curve was constructed using a protein-metabolite conjugate spiked into dried bovine blood. These spiked samples served as a model for tissues from animals poisoned by the toxic metabolite of PAs. Tissue samples from pigs fed various amounts of the PA alkaloid riddelliine (from Senecio riddellii) were analyzed for pyrrolic metabolites, and the results were applied to the calibration curve to provide a measure of the degree of PA poisoning. Pyrrolic metabolites were detected in liver and blood samples of all poisoned animals at levels between 2 and 64 ppm. Although differences in metabolite levels could be discerned under the reported experimental conditions, the amount detected did not correlate with the dose of riddelliine given; and livers fixed with formalin gave greatly reduced recovery than those same livers either frozen or freeze dried.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

[Poisonous animals at bathing beaches].

Tourists and native inhabitants of tropical and subtropical regions differ significantly with regard to the risk and nature of incidents involving venomous and poisonous animals. While the indigenous population encounters such risks daily during work and other activities, tourists are usually endangered while swimming or diving, or by ingesting toxin-containing fish and/or other seafood. Whether abroad or at home, allergic reactions to the stings of bees, wasps and hornets are probably the most common manifestations of an encounter with a "poisonous animal". Travellers should be well acquainted with the dangers entailed in encountering or ingesting a venomous or poisonous animal--prevention is the most important measure.

Animals↗