Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Allopurinol”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Gout and allopurinol adherence in newly diagnosed patients and the risk of fractures: a nationwide cohort study.

INTRODUCTION / OBJECTIVES: The association between gout and fractures remains controversial due to the competing effects of uric acid's antioxidant properties and gout-induced chronic inflammation. Our study aimed to evaluate the risk of fractures in newly diagnosed gout patients and to analyze the impact of Allopurinol medication adherence on this risk. METHODS: This nationwide cohort study utilized the National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort (NHIS-HEALS) database (2002-2019). We identified 4,107 patients newly diagnosed with gout who remained on continuous allopurinol therapy during the 24-month medication assessment period and matched them 1:3 with 12,321 non-gout controls using propensity score matching. Allopurinol adherence was assessed via the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) over a 24-month period and categorized into three groups: MPR&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.3, 0.3&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;MPR&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.8, and MPR&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;0.8. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for fractures (vertebral, hip, and distal radius). RESULTS: Gout patients demonstrated a significantly higher risk of overall fractures compared to the non-gout group (aHR 5.52; 95% CI 4.19-7.26). A significant inverse linear relationship was observed between allopurinol adherence and fracture risk (P for trend&#x2009;<&#x2009;.001). The risk was highest in the low-adherence group (MPR&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.3; aHR 5.91; 95% CI 4.40-7.93) and relatively lower in the high-adherence group (MPR&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;0.8; aHR 4.77; 95% CI 2.94-7.72). Consistent trends were observed for vertebral (aHR 5.68) and hip (aHR 4.22) fractures. These associations remained consistent across all subgroups, including age, sex, and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Newly diagnosed gout is associated with a substantially increased risk of fractures. Higher adherence to Allopurinol therapy is correlated with a significant reduction in this risk, suggesting that consistent urate-lowering therapy may mitigate gout-related bone fragility. Key Points &#x2022; Newly diagnosed gout patients have a significantly higher risk of major osteoporotic fractures compared to the non-gout population. &#x2022; A significant inverse linear relationship exists between Allopurinol adherence and fracture risk, with the highest adherence group (MPR &#x2265; 0.8) showing a relatively lower risk. &#x2022; Consistent urate-lowering therapy (ULT) may mitigate bone fragility in gout patients by reducing systemic inflammatory burden caused by urate crystal deposition.

Humans

Non-genetic Risk Factors for Allopurinol-Induced Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (SCAR): A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are rare but potentially life threatening, particularly in Asian populations. While the genetic marker HLA-B*58:01 is a well-established risk factor, non-genetic factors may also contribute. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on associations between non-genetic risk factors and allopurinol-induced SCAR. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science from inception to 29 June 2026 for observational studies examining non-genetic risk factors for SCAR, defined as Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis, Acute Generalised Exanthematous Pustulosis, or Hypersensitivity Syndrome/Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms. Adults aged &#x2265;&#xa0;18 years were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model; heterogeneity was assessed with I2. Mean differences were calculated for continuous variables. NIH Study Quality Assessment Tool was used for quality assessment of the studies. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included. Female sex (20 studies; 3340 SCAR cases, 562,647 controls) was associated with an increased risk of allopurinol-induced SCAR (OR 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-3.38). Chronic kidney disease (16 studies; 1625 SCAR cases, 553,804 controls) was also significantly associated with SCAR (OR 3.78; 95% CI 1.99-7.17). Five studies (177 SCAR cases, 1368 controls) reported higher allopurinol doses among SCAR cases than tolerant controls (mean difference 19.61 mg; 95% CI 2.97-36.24). No significant associations were observed for age or concomitant diuretic use in the primary meta-analyses. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated consistent findings for most factors, although concomitant diuretic use became significantly associated with SCAR after exclusion of non-Asian and zero-event studies. CONCLUSION: CKD, female sex, and higher allopurinol dose were identified as significant non-genetic risk factors for allopurinol-induced SCAR. These findings support consideration of non-genetic factors alongside pharmacogenomic screening in future risk-stratification strategies. However, substantial heterogeneity and potential publication bias limit the certainty of the available evidence. Well-designed studies evaluating non-genetic predictors as primary outcomes are needed to develop robust integrated risk prediction models for clinical decision making.

Journal Article

Efficacy, acceptability, and related outcomes of pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar mania: a systematic review and dose-related network meta-analysis across different age groups.

BACKGROUND: Acute bipolar mania carries negative social and economic consequences. We investigated the comparative efficacy/response/acceptability of pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar mania, considering dose effects across different age groups. METHODS: We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological interventions with one another or placebo in acute bipolar mania patients, indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus (from inception through 2025.12.24). Co-primary outcomes were change in manic symptoms/response/and acceptability. Tolerability/remission and rate of adverse events were secondary outcomes. Confidence-In-Network-Meta-Analysis was likewise appraised. RESULTS: 113 RCTs, encompassing 49 distinct treatment combinations, included 20,666 participants. Sensitivity analysis retaining only low-risk-of-bias studies and excluding outliers for possible effect modifiers indicated that risperidone 3&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-7.57;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-8.25;-5.85); tamoxifen 160&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-1.73;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-2.32;-1.13); rivastigmine 3&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-1.13;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-1.06;-0.58); haloperidol 30&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.96;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-1.25;-0.75); valproate 750&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.76;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-1.48;-0.58); tamoxifen 40&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.75;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-1.41;-0.59); celecoxib 400&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.74;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-1.20;-0.38); paliperidone extended-release 12&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.62; 95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.91;-0.32); olanzapine 15&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.59;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.60;-0.38); olanzapine 20&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.52;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.66;-0.38); risperidone 4&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.53;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.76;-0.29); allopurinol 600&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.54;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.67;-0.22); cariprazine 12&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.49;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.66;-0.33); risperidone 4.2&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.46;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.75;-0.17); lithium 1500&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.42;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.57;-0.28); ziprasidone 160&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.49;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.68;-0.31); asenapine 20&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.38;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.53;-0.22); haloperidol 8&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.34;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.63;-0.05); aripiprazole 15&#xa0;mg/day(SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.33;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.61;-0.06) outperformed placebo. Ziprasidone 160&#xa0;mg/day, celecoxib 200&#xa0;mg/day, asenapine 20&#xa0;mg/day, and asenapine 10&#xa0;mg/day proved more efficacious than placebo in children. No statistically significant differences were reported between treatments and placebo for response/remission/acceptability/tolerability, and manic/hypomanic switch. A meta-regression of efficacy effect sizes against the adapted AMSTAR-Plus content scores showed that larger SMDs were associated with lower AMSTAR scores, indicating lower study quality, warranting further caution for such large efficacy estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with previous NMAs and current guidelines, expanding the current knowledge base while concurrently appraising different drugs, doses, and age groups.

Humans