Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Accessory Nerve Injuries”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Iatrogenic accessory nerve injury.

Accessory nerve injury produces considerable disability. The nerve is most frequently damaged as a complication of radical neck dissection, cervical lymph node biopsy and other surgical procedures. The problem is frequently compounded by a failure to recognise the error immediately after surgery when surgical repair has the greatest chance of success. We present cases which outline the risk of accessory nerve injury, the spectrum of clinical presentations and the problems produced by a failure to recognise the deficit. Regional anatomy, consequences of nerve damage and management options are discussed. Diagnostic biopsy of neck nodes should not be undertaken as a primary investigation and, when indicated, surgery in this region should be performed by suitably trained staff under well-defined conditions. Awareness of iatrogenic injury and its consequences would avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment.

Accessory Nerve↗

Accessory nerve injury during carotid endarterectomy.

Injury to the accessory nerve (cranial nerve XI) during carotid endarterectomy is rare; to date only three cases have been reported in the literature. Traction on the sternocleido-mastoid muscle was the proposed mechanism of injury in all three cases. Four cases of accessory nerve palsy occurred in 850 carotid endarterectomies performed between 1978 and 1986 at this institution, an incidence of 0.47%. All four patients had classic signs and symptoms of accessory nerve injury, which developed between 20 and 60 days after operation. The three most recent cases were examined specifically for accessory nerve injury in the immediate postoperative period and exhibited normal trapezius function. None had any other central nervous system dysfunction. Two of these patients regained full accessory nerve function and the most recent case is showing signs of reinnervation with conservative therapy. Isolated central nervous system and spontaneous accessory nerve palsies are exceptionally rare, and since any traction injury or transection should have been detected by postoperative examinations in three of four patients, we propose surgical scar formation as a mechanism of accessory nerve palsy after carotid endarterectomy. If such a palsy develops in the postoperative period, we recommend conservative therapy.

Accessory Nerve Injuries↗

The posterior triangle and the painful shoulder: spinal accessory nerve injury.

Forty-three cases of accessory nerve injury referred to the Peripheral Nerve Injury Unit have been reviewed. Accessory nerve injury results in a characteristic group of symptoms and signs. Referral for treatment is usually delayed, the average time being 11.3 months. Surgical treatment resulted in improvement of symptoms in almost all cases.

Accessory Nerve↗

Diagnosis and treatment of iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve injury.

Although iatrogenic injury to the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior cervical triangle is a well-described phenomenon, diagnosis can prove difficult and is often incorrect or delayed. We describe a series of six men and three women (mean age 40 years; range, 20 to 52 years) with iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve injuries. Injuries resulted from lymph node biopsies in the posterior cervical triangle in eight patients and posterior foss surgery in one. Eight patients lost the ability to abduct their arm but could still shrug their shoulder, a pattern that resulted in an incorrect initial diagnosis in five patients. The average delay from injury to referral was 8 months. Seven patients underwent nerve exploration an average of 9.7 months after injury. Five had transected nerves that could be repaired; three of these patients required a nerve graft. Pain was greatly relieved in the five patients who had severe pain before surgery, and weakened shoulder abduction improved in four of six patients. Nerve exploration should be considered when the patient's clinical exam does not improve within 3 months of injury. Nerve repair frequently reduces pain and improves shoulder abduction, even 12 months after injury.

Accessory Nerve Injuries↗

Accessory nerve injury: conservative or surgical treatment?

In order to clarify the functional prognosis of accessory nerve injury after nerve repair and nonsurgical treatment, 27 of our cases with accessory nerve injury were studied. 20 cases were followed up for more than 8 months. In ten cases treated conservatively, the dull feeling and hypaesthesia did not improve. However, pain and dysfunction of the shoulder improved in half of these cases. In ten cases treated surgically, nerve suture was performed in two cases, nerve graft in five cases and neurolysis in three cases. In the surgically treated group, subjective complaints disappeared in all cases, but hypaesthesia or contracture of the shoulder persisted in three cases. Surgical treatment of the accessory nerve is recommended in fresh cases with complete paralysis and in cases in which there is no sign of nerve recovery within one year after the original injury.

Accessory Nerve↗

Surgical treatment for spinal accessory nerve injury.

We report on the surgical results of spinal accessory nerve injuries between 1992-2003. We operated on 10 patients (9 female, and 1 male) who had injuries of the spinal accessory nerve. All injuries were iatrogenic. The mean age of patients was 39.2 years (range, 20-57 years). The average interval between date of injury and surgery was 7 months (range, 4-12 months). All patients had stiffness and pain in the shoulder girdle. The average active abduction of the shoulder joint was 79.5 degrees (range, 60-100 degrees ) before surgery. End-to-end repairs were performed in 7 cases, and graft repairs were indicated in 3 cases. The mean follow-up period was 18.4 months (range, 8-36 months). The average active abduction of the shoulder joint was 171 degrees (range, 140-180 degrees ) at time of final follow-up.

Accessory Nerve↗

[Evaluation of iatrogenic accessory nerve injury in forensic medical practice].

The authors give a survey of the clinical and medical-legal characteristics of the accessory nerve injury. In the past two decades the conception of the successfulness of the surgical treatment of the accessory nerve injury became prevailing. About the medical-legal aspects of the iatrogenic injury of the nerve reported in connection of the reconstructive surgery chiefly also departments of neurosurgery, orthopedics and traumatology. In the case of the authors a 70 year old patient suffered 10 years ago a iatrogenic accessory nerve injury. The mild trapezius palsy recovered spontaneously practically with cosmetic disadvantage. In connection with the development of extreme dorso-lumbal scoliosis associated with torsion the trapezius atrophy worsened. Physical therapy was partly successful. But the patient became unfit for manual work. Their observations sustain the data of authors who established that in the case of accessory nerve injury not only the surgical but also conservative treatment is usually successful. In opposite to certain data of the literature the authors establish that the iatrogenic injuries of the accessory nerve may lead to significant lifelong disability. The diagnosis is not always made in time with consequent delay in repair. This may be regarded as an unfavorable issue during medical-legal discussions. The authors recommend in interest to prevent nerve injury in the posterior triangle of the neck to perform operation in special department.

Accessory Nerve↗

Spinal accessory nerve injury.

Injury to the spinal accessory nerve can lead to dysfunction of the trapezius. The trapezius is a major scapular stabilizer and is composed of three functional components. It contributes to scapulothoracic rhythm by elevating, rotating, and retracting the scapula. The superficial course of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior cervical triangle makes it susceptible to injury. Iatrogenic injury to the nerve after a surgical procedure is one of the most common causes of trapezius palsy. Dysfunction of the trapezius can be a painful and disabling condition. The shoulder droops as the scapula is translated laterally and rotated downward. Patients present with an asymmetric neckline, a drooping shoulder, winging of the scapula, and weakness of forward elevation. Evaluation should include a complete electrodiagnostic examination. If diagnosed within 1 year of the injury, microsurgical reconstruction of the nerve should be considered. Conservative treatment of chronic trapezius paralysis is appropriate for older patients who are sendentary. Active and healthy patients in whom 1 year of conservative treatment has failed are candidates for surgical reconstruction. Studies have shown the Eden-Lange procedure, in which the insertions of the levator scapulae, rhomboideus minor, and rhomboideus major muscles are transferred, relieves pain, corrects deformity, and improves function in patients with irreparable injury to the spinal accessory nerve.

Accessory Nerve↗

Surgical outcomes of 111 spinal accessory nerve injuries.

OBJECTIVE: Iatrogenic injury to the spinal accessory nerve is not uncommon during neck surgery involving the posterior cervical triangle, because its superficial course here makes it susceptible. We review injury mechanisms, operative techniques, and surgical outcomes of 111 surgical repairs of the spinal accessory nerve. METHODS: This retrospective study examines clinical and surgical experience with spinal accessory nerve injuries at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center during a period of 23 years (1978-2000). Surgery was performed on the basis of anatomic and electrophysiological findings at the time of operation. Patients were followed up for an average of 25.6 months. RESULTS: The most frequent injury mechanism was iatrogenic (103 patients, 93%), and 82 (80%) of these injuries involved lymph node biopsies. Eight injuries were caused by stretch (five patients) and laceration (three patients). The most common procedures were graft repairs in 58 patients. End-to-end repair was used in 26 patients and neurolysis in 19 patients if the nerve was found in continuity with intraoperative electrical evidence of regeneration. Five neurotizations, two burials into muscle, and one removal of ligature material were also performed. More than 95% of patients treated by neurolysis supported by positive nerve action potential recordings improved to Grade 4 or higher. Of 84 patients with lesions repaired by graft or suture, 65 patients (77%) recovered to Grade 3 or higher. The average graft length was 1.5 inches. CONCLUSION: Surgical exploration and repair of spinal accessory nerve injuries is difficult. With perseverance, however, these patients with complete or severe deficits achieved favorable functional outcomes through operative exploration and repair.

Accessory Nerve↗

Treatment of a proximal accessory nerve injury with nerve transfer.

OBJECTIVE AND HYPOTHESIS: This study presents a case report of a patient who sustained an iatrogenic proximal accessory nerve injury that was treated with a medial pectoral to accessory nerve transfer. STUDY DESIGN: Case study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chart of one patient who was treated with a medial pectoral to accessory nerve transfer was reviewed. RESULTS: Five months after excision of a branchial cyst that resulted in a very proximal injury to the accessory nerve, this patient underwent a medial pectoral to accessory nerve transfer. At final follow-up, 3 years after surgery, the patient had full abduction overhead with some residual shoulder/scapular discomfort and mild scapular winging. CONCLUSION: The medial pectoral to accessory nerve transfer provides a viable surgical option with good reinnervation of the trapezius muscle in patients with a proximal accessory nerve injury where standard nerve repair or graft techniques are not feasible.

Accessory Nerve↗

Physical therapy for spinal accessory nerve injury complicated by adhesive capsulitis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The authors found no literature describing adhesive capsulitis as a consequence of spinal accessory nerve injury and no exercise program or protocol for patients with spinal accessory nerve injury. The purpose of this case report is to describe the management of a patient with adhesive capsulitis and spinal accessory nerve injury following a carotid endarterectomy. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was a 67-year-old woman referred for physical therapy following manipulation of the left shoulder and a diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis by her orthopedist. Spinal accessory nerve injury was identified during the initial physical therapy examination, and a program of neuromuscular electrical stimulation was initiated. OUTCOMES: The patient had almost full restoration of the involved muscle function after 5 months of physical therapy. DISCUSSION: This case report illustrates the importance of accurate diagnosis and suggests physical therapy intervention to manage adhesive capsulitis as a consequence of spinal accessory nerve injury.

Accessory Nerve Diseases↗

Extracranial spinal accessory nerve injury.

Eighty-three consecutive patients with extracranial accessory nerve injury seen over a 12-year period are reviewed. The most common etiology was iatrogenic injury to the nerve at the time of previous surgery. Such operations were usually minor in nature and often related to lymph node or benign tumor removal. Examination usually distinguished winging due to trapezius weakness from that of serratus anterior palsy. Trapezius weakness was seen in all cases. Sternocleidomastoid weakness was unusual. Patients with accessory palsy were evaluated by both clinical and electromyographic studies. Patients who exhibited no clinical or electrical evidence of regeneration were operated on (44 cases). Based on intraoperative nerve action potential studies, 8 lesions in continuity had neurolysis alone. Resection with repair either by end-to-end suture or by grafts was necessary in 31 cases. One case had suture removed from nerve, two had nerve placed into target muscle, and two had more proximal neurotization. Function was usually improved in both operative and nonoperative patients. Related anatomy is discussed.

Accessory Nerve↗

[Treatment of accessory nerve injury].

From 1975 through 1988, 11 cases with accessory nerve injury were admitted to our hospital. The etiology in 9 of these cases was inadvertent surgical injury during operation. In the other 2 cases it was injured in accidents. The typical clinical manifestations of paralysis of the trapezius muscle and disorder of the shoulder movement were all seen in our cases. The diagnostic features, indications for operation, surgical technics and criteria for efficacy assessment were discussed. The necessity of early operation was stressed, and either neurorrhaphy or neurolysis should be done.

Accessory Nerve↗

Accessory nerve injury.

A series of 13 patients with an injury of the accessory nerve in the posterior cervical triangle is reported. In 11 patients the nerve was damaged during a lymph node biopsy and in two cases there was a sharp glass injury. Paralysis of the trapezius muscle occurred with resulting deformity and loss of function of the shoulder. Nine patients were operated on. In five cases neurolysis, in two cases neurorrhaphy and in two cases reconstruction with a sural nerve graft were performed 3-17 months after the injury. The result was good or fair in six operative cases. Five of these were neurolyses. In one instance good and in three cases fair recovery was achieved without operation. All but one of the patients were able to return to their former employment. The mean follow-up time was 20 months.

Accessory Nerve↗

Accessory nerve injury.

This article discusses a Supreme Court judgment involving an injury to the spinal accessory nerve which occurred during the excision of a lymph node mass in the posterior triangle of the neck.1 In this case, the medical practitioner was found to have been negligent for failing to diagnose the nerve injury in the postoperative period, and not for the actual injury to the nerve during the procedure.

Abscess↗

Patient outcome after surgical management of an accessory nerve injury.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed patient outcome following surgical reconstruction of the accessory nerve after an iatrogenic injury. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of 8 patients was performed. RESULTS: There were 3 men and 5 women in the study, and the mean time between injury and nerve graft/repair surgery was 5 months. Four injuries were sustained during a lymph node biopsy. Electromyography revealed a complete accessory nerve injury in all cases. In 6 cases, a nerve graft was required (mean length, 3.6 cm), and in 2 cases, a direct nerve repair was possible. The trapezius muscle was successfully reinnervated in all cases. In total, full shoulder abduction was achieved in 6 cases; in the remaining 2 cases, the patients achieved shoulder abduction to 90 degrees. CONCLUSION: Functional deficit after accessory nerve injury is significant. Nerve graft/repair reconstruction reliably yields a satisfactory result, providing good scapular rotation and thus good shoulder function.

Accessory Nerve↗

Delayed primary repair of a kyrogenic spinal accessory nerve injury: a case report.

The course of the accessory nerve through the posterior cervical triangle is superficial and in close juxtaposition to the posterior cervical lymph node chain. These anatomic features contribute to the common occurrence of kyrogenic injury to the accessory nerve. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of this injury often is delayed because the clinical presentation may mimic shoulder impingement or adhesive capsulitis. The authors present a case with a 15-year followup of a 48-year-old woman who underwent successful delayed primary repair of an accessory nerve injury after a lymph node biopsy. Electromyographic examination is recommended at 3 weeks after a suspected accessory nerve lesion, and if evidence of trapezial denervation is present, early surgical exploration is indicated because spontaneous recovery is rare.

Accessory Nerve Injuries↗