Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Abacavir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Antiretroviral effect and safety of abacavir alone and in combination with zidovudine in HIV-infected adults. Abacavir Phase 2 Clinical Team.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, over 12 weeks, the antiretroviral activity and safety of abacavir, used alone and in combination with zidovudine (ZDV), as treatment for HIV-1-infected subjects who had limited or no antiretroviral treatment. DESIGN: Seventy-nine HIV-1-infected subjects, with CD4 cell counts 200-500 x 10(6)/l and <12 weeks of previous treatment with ZDV were enrolled in a multicenter study. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four cohorts receiving abacavir monotherapy for the first 4 weeks (200, 400, or 600 mg every 8 h daily, or 300 mg every 12 h daily) and, thereafter, combination therapy of abacavir with 600 mg ZDV or ZDV placebo, administered in a double-blind manner for an additional 8 weeks. METHODS: Antiretroviral activity was assessed by measuring changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4+ cell counts. Safety was assessed by monitoring clinical adverse events and laboratory abnormalities during the 12-week period and for 4 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: Treatment with abacavir, alone or in combination with ZDV, produced marked decreases in plasma HIV-1 RNA loads and increases in CD4+ cell counts in all groups. At week 4, median plasma HIV-1 RNA loads decreased by 1.11-1.77 log10 copies/ml and median CD4+ cell counts increased by 63-111 x 10(6)/l in all groups. At week 12, median HIV-1 RNA loads decreased by 1.02-2.24 log10 copies/ml (abacavir monotherapy) and by 1.81-2.01 log10 copies/ml (abacavir-ZDV); median CD4+ cell counts increased by 79-195 x 10(6)/l (abacavir monotherapy) and by 93-142 x 10(6)/l (abacavir-ZDV). At week 12, the percentage of subjects who had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 400 and 40 copies/ml were 28 and 11%, respectively (abacavir monotherapy) and 69 and 22%, respectively (abacavir-ZDV). Eight subjects (10%) discontinued the study prematurely because of adverse events; nausea (n = 4) and hypersensitivity (n = 3) were the most common reasons for withdrawal. There were no deaths among the study subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-infected subjects who have received little or no prior antiretroviral therapy, treatment with abacavir alone or in combination with ZDV is well tolerated and resulted in sustained improvements in key immunologic and virologic efficacy parameters through 12 weeks.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2005

Abacavir and lamivudine fixed-dose combination tablet once daily compared with abacavir and lamivudine twice daily in HIV-infected patients over 48 weeks (ESS30008, SEAL).

BACKGROUND: Abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine (3TC) administered twice daily were compared with an ABC + 3TC fixed-dose combination (Epzicom, Kivexa; EPZ) administered once daily, both in combination with a protease inhibitor (PI) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). METHODS: Two hundred sixty HIV-infected subjects with more than 6 months of ABC and 3TC administered twice daily plus a PI or NNRTI with an HIV-1 RNA level less than 400 copies/mL for more than 3 months and a CD4 count greater than 50 cells/mm were randomized 1:1 to ABC + 3TC administered twice daily or EPZ administered once daily. RESULTS: At baseline, median time on ABC and 3TC administered twice daily was 22 months, and median CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA level were 554 cells/mm and <50 copies/mL, respectively. EPZ administered once daily was established as not inferior to ABC + 3TC administered twice daily based on the proportion of nonvirologic failures (confirmed HIV-1 RNA level > or =1265 copies/mL; 90% confidence interval: -3.4 to 6.4; (intent to treat [ITT]: missing [M] = failure [F]). Proportions with an HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL were 81% of those taking EPZ once daily and 82% of those taking ABC + 3TC twice daily at week 48 (ITT: M = F). Virologic failure was rare (2 patients taking the once-daily regimen, 4 patients taking the twice-daily regimen). There was a low incidence of grade 2 through 4 adverse events (AEs) and no drug-related serious AEs or hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSIONS: EPZ administered once daily was established as not inferior to ABC + 3TC administered twice daily in a regimen containing an NNRTI or a PI over 48 weeks. A dual-nucleoside backbone of ABC and 3TC administered once or twice daily is effective, durable, and well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety of abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine taken as a triple combination tablet and as abacavir plus a lamivudine-zidovudine double combination tablet by HIV-1-infected adults.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of a triple combination tablet containing abacavir (ABC) 300 mg, lamivudine (3TC) 150 mg, and zidovudine (ZDV) 300 mg taken twice/day, and those of ABC 300 mg twice/day plus a double combination tablet containing 3TC 150 mg and ZDV 300 mg twice/day (ABC-COM). DESIGN: Open-label, crossover study. SETTING: Two hospital-based clinical research units. PATIENTS: Twelve men infected with human immunodeficiency virus-1. INTERVENTION: Steady-state pharmacokinetics of ABC, 3TC, and ZDV were assessed after dosing with ABC-COM and the triple combination tablet. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Steady-state pharmacokinetics of ABC, 3TC, and ZDV were similar for the triple combination tablet versus ABC-COM for the following: geometric mean (GM) area under the serum concentration-time curve, ABC 6.08 versus 5.87, 3TC 5.51 versus 5.53, and ZDV 1.38 versus 1.46 microg x hr/ml; GM maximum serum concentration (Cmax-ss), ABC 3.09 versus 3.19, 3TC 1.26 versus 1.40, and ZDV 1.19 versus 1.15 microg/ml; median time to Cmax-ss, ABC 0.75 versus 0.75, 3TC 1.50 versus 1.24, and ZDV 0.75 versus 0.75 hours; and GM oral clearance, ABC 51 versus 49, 3TC 27 versus 27, and ZDV 217 versus 206 L/hour. The GM half-lives of ABC and ZDV were similar for both treatments, 1.69 versus 1.58 and 2.30 versus 2.08 hours, respectively. CONCLUSION: Steady-state pharmacokinetics of ABC, 3TC, and ZDV were similar in patients who took them as ABC-COM or as a triple combination tablet.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of abacavir alone and in combination with zidovudine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults.

Abacavir (1592U89) is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with potent activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) when used alone or in combination with other antiretroviral agents. The present study was conducted to determine the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of abacavir in HIV-1-infected subjects following oral administration of daily doses that ranged from 600 to 1,800 mg, with and without zidovudine. Seventy-nine subjects received abacavir monotherapy for 4 weeks (200, 400, or 600 mg every 8 hours [TID] and 300 mg every 12 h [BID]) and thereafter received either zidovudine (200 mg TID or 300 mg BID) or matching placebo with abacavir for 8 additional weeks. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for abacavir after administration of the first dose and at week 4 and for abacavir, zidovudine, and its glucuronide metabolite at week 12. The concentrations of abacavir in cerebrospinal fluid were determined in a subset of subjects. Steady-state plasma abacavir concentrations were achieved by week 4 of monotherapy and persisted to week 12. At steady state, abacavir pharmacokinetic parameters (area under the plasma concentration-time curve for a dosing interval [AUC(tau)] and peak concentration [C(max)]) were generally proportional to dose over the range of a 600- to 1,200-mg total daily dose. Coadministration of zidovudine with abacavir produced a small and inconsistent effect on abacavir pharmacokinetic parameters across the different doses. At the clinical abacavir dose (300 mg BID) zidovudine coadministration had no effect on the abacavir AUC(tau), which is most closely associated with efficacy. Zidovudine pharmacokinetics appeared to be unaffected by abacavir. Statistically significant but weak relationships were found for the change in the log(10) HIV-1 RNA load from the baseline to week 4 versus total daily AUC(tau) and C(tau) (P < 0.05). The incidence of nausea was significantly associated with total daily AUC(tau) and C(max). In conclusion, abacavir has predictable pharmacokinetic characteristics following the administration of multiple doses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Association between presence of HLA-B*5701, HLA-DR7, and HLA-DQ3 and hypersensitivity to HIV-1 reverse-transcriptase inhibitor abacavir.

BACKGROUND: The use of abacavir--a potent HIV-1 nucleoside-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitor--is complicated by a potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity syndrome in about 5% of cases. Genetic factors influencing the immune response to abacavir might confer susceptibility. We aimed to find associations between MHC alleles and abacavir hypersensitivity in HIV-1-positive individuals treated with abacavir. METHODS: MHC region typing was done in the first 200 Western Australian HIV Cohort Study participants exposed to abacavir. Definite abacavir hypersensitivity was identified in 18 cases, and was excluded in 167 individuals with more than 6 weeks' exposure to the drug (abacavir tolerant). 15 individuals experienced some symptoms but did not meet criteria for abacavir hypersensitivity. p values were corrected for comparisons of multiple HLA alleles (p(c)) by multiplication of the raw p value by the estimated number of HLA alleles present within the loci examined. FINDINGS: HLA-B*5701 was present in 14 (78%) of the 18 patients with abacavir hypersensitivity, and in four (2%) of the 167 abacavir tolerant patients (odds ratio 117 [95% CI 29-481], p(c)<0.0001), and the HLA-DR7 and HLA-DQ3 combination was found in 13 (72%) of hypersensitive and five (3%) of tolerant patients (73 [20-268], p(c)<0.0001 ). HLA-B*5701, HLA-DR7, and HLA-DQ3 were present in combination in 13 (72%) hypersensitive patients and none of the tolerant patients (822 [43-15 675], p(c)<0.0001). Other MHC markers also present on the 57.1 ancestral haplotype to which the three markers above belong confirmed the presence of haplotype-specific linkage disequilibrium, and mapped potential susceptibility loci to a region bounded by C4A6 and HLA-C. Within the entire abacavir-exposed cohort (n=200), presence of HLA-B*5701, HLA-DR7, and HLA-DQ3 had a positive predictive value for hypersensitivity of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 97%. INTERPRETATION: Genetic susceptibility to abacavir hypersensitivity is carried on the 57.1 ancestral haplotype. In our population, withholding abacavir in those with HLA-B*5701, HLA-DR7, and HLA-DQ3 should reduce the prevalence of hypersensitivity from 9% to 2.5% without inappropriately denying abacavir to any patient.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Abacavir: absolute bioavailability, bioequivalence of three oral formulations, and effect of food.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Study A: to determine the absolute bioavailability of a single 300-mg abacavir hemisulfate tablet. Study B: to determine the bioequivalence of two oral abacavir formulations (300-mg hemisulfate tablet, 100-mg succinate caplet), the effect of food on the bioavailability of the 300-mg hemisulfate tablet, and the bioavailability of the hemisulfate tablet relative to the hemisulfate solution. DESIGN: Phase I, randomized, open-label, balanced two- (study A) and three- or four-period (study B), crossover studies. SETTING: Two clinical research centers. SUBJECTS: Six men infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), aged 27-39 years (study A), and 18 HIV-infected men and women, aged 21-50 years (study B). INTERVENTIONS: In study A, all subjects received a single, oral 300-mg tablet of abacavir hemisulfate or a single, intravenous infusion of abacavir hemisulfate 150 mg over 60 minutes. In study B, all subjects received each of three single-dose treatments: three 100-mg abacavir succinate caplets in a fasted state, one 300-mg abacavir hemisulfate tablet in a fasted state, and one 300-mg abacavir hemisulfate tablet with a high-fat breakfast. Twelve subjects in study B also received a fourth treatment of abacavir hemisulfate 300 mg as an oral solution in a fasted state. Plasma samples collected for 24 hours (study A) or 12 hours (study B), and urine samples collected for 12 hours (study A) were analyzed by validated high-performance liquid chromatographic methods. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Abacavir pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using standard, noncompartmental methods. In study A, the geometric least square (GLS) mean absolute bioavailability of oral abacavir was 83% (range 65-107%). In study B, the hemisulfate tablet was bioequivalent to the succinate caplet, but its time to maximum concentration (Tmax) occurred 30 minutes earlier. Administration of the abacavir hemisulfate tablet with food had no effect on area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity), decreased maximum concentration (Cmax) by 26%, and delayed Tmax by 38 minutes. The relative bioavailability (GLS mean AUC0-infinity ratio) of the 300-mg abacavir hemisulfate tablet to solution was 101%, Cmax was 11% lower, and Tmax was unchanged. The most common drug-related adverse events associated with abacavir were nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and headache, all of which were mild. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, abacavir is safe and well tolerated and can be administered with or without meals.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Baseline resistance and virological outcome in patients with virological failure who start a regimen containing abacavir: EuroSIDA study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the ability of several HIV-1 drug-resistance interpretation systems, as well as the number of pre-specified combinations of abacavir-related mutations, to predict virological response to abacavir-containing regimens in antiretroviral therapy-experienced, abacavir-naive patients starting an abacavir-containing regimen in the EuroSIDA cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL) >500 copies/ml who had a plasma sample available at the time of starting abacavir (baseline) were included. Resistance to abacavir was interpreted by using eight different commonly used systems that consisted of rules-based algorithms or tables of mutations. Correlation between baseline abacavir-resistance mutations and month 6 virological response was performed on this population using a multivariable linear regression model accounting for censored data. RESULTS: The baseline VL was 4.36 log10 RNA copies/ml [interquartile range (IQR): 3.65-4.99 log10 RNA copies/ml] and the median CD4 cell count was 210 cells/microl (IQR: 67-305 cells/microl). Our patients were pre-exposed to a median of seven antiretrovirals (2-12) before starting abacavir therapy. The median (range) number of abacavir mutations (according to the International AIDS Society-USA) detected at baseline was 3.5 (0-8). Overall, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median month 6 VL decline was 0.86 log10 RNA copies/ml [95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 0.45-1.24]. The VL in those patients (n=31) who intensified treatment by adding only abacavir decreased by a median 0.20 log10 RNA copies/ml (95% CI: -0.18; +0.94). The proportion of patients who harboured viruses fully resistant to abacavir among the eight genotypic resistance interpretation algorithms ranged from 12% [Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS)] to 79% [Stanford HIV RT and PR Sequence Database (HIVdb)]. Some interpretation systems showed statistically significant associations between the predicted resistance status and the virological response while others showed no consistent association. The number of active drugs in the regimen was associated with greater virological suppression (additional month 6 VL reduction per additional sensitive drug=0.51, 95% CI: 0.15-0.88, P=0.006); baseline VL was also weakly associated (additional month 6 VL reduction per log10 higher=0.30, 95% CI: -0.02; +0.62, P=0.06). In contrast, the number of drugs previously received was associated with diminished viral reduction (additional month 6 VL reduction per additional drug=-0.14, 95% CI: -0.28; 0.00, P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed a high degree of variability among several genotypic resistance interpretation algorithms currently in use for abacavir. Therefore, the interpretation of genotypic resistance for predicting response to regimens containing abacavir remains a major challenge.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A dose-ranging study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of abacavir alone or in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine in antiretroviral treatment-naive subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To compare antiretroviral efficacy, safety and tolerance of three dosing regimens of the novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, abacavir (1592U89) over 24 weeks and its efficacy in open-label combination with zidovudine and lamivudine. DESIGN: Sixty HIV-1-infected antiretroviral therapy naive subjects (entry criteria; CD4+ cell count > or = 100 cells/mm(3), plasma HIV-1 RNA > or = 30 000 copies/ml), randomized into 20 subjects per cohort received 100, 300 or 600 mg abacavir twice daily. Subjects successfully completing 24 weeks' randomized therapy could switch to open label therapy (abacavir, zidovudine, lamivudine at 300, 300 and 150 mg twice daily, respectively) for a further 24 weeks of studly, as could subjects meeting one or more switch criteria. METHODS: Subjects were assessed for antiretroviral activity by measuring changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA load and CD4+ cell counts. Evaluation of safety and tolerance was based on clinical adverse events and laboratory analyses. RESULTS: At week 4, subjects receiving 300 or 600 mg abacavir twice daily had greater reductions in plasma HIV-1 RNA (median changes -1.55 and -1.61 log10) copies/ml, respectively); differences (P = 0.007 and P < or = 0.001, respectively) than subjects receiving 100 mg abacavir twice daily (median change, -0.63 log10 copies/ml). Differences between the 300 and 600 mg twice daily groups were not clinically or statistically significant. At 24 weeks, analysis showed a median change in plasma HIV-1 RNA of -0.70 and -1.30 log10 copies/ml in the 300 and 600 mg twice daily groups, respectively. During the open label phase in which zidovudine/lamivudine was added to 300 mg abacavir twice daily, a further median reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA of 1.74 log10 copies/ml was seen. At 48 weeks pooled data from all abacavir-treated subjects showed a sustained reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA of 2.8 log10) copies/ml; 65% and 43% of subjects had < or = 400 and < or = 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml, respectively, and a further median increase of 111 CD4+ cells/mm3 were seen. Abacavir was generally well tolerated with few clinically significant adverse events. Two subjects (3.3%) developed hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir. There were no differences between the groups with regard to serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of antiretroviral therapy naive subjects, treatment with 300 or 600 mg abacavir twice daily was statistically superior to a 100 mg twice daily dose at 4 weeks. Combinations therapy containing abacavir-zidovudine-lamivudine was a highly effective antiretroviral regimen, resulting in substantial reductions in plasma HIV-1 RNA which may be comparable to combinations containing protease inhibitors. Abacavir was generally tolerated.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1999

Single-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of abacavir (1592U89), zidovudine, and lamivudine administered alone and in combination in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Abacavir (1592U89), a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with in vitro activity against human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1), has been evaluated for efficacy and safety in combination regimens with other nucleoside analogs, including zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC). To evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic interactions between these agents, 15 HIV-1-infected adults with a median CD4(+) cell count of 347 cells/mm3 (range, 238 to 570 cells/mm3) were enrolled in a randomized, seven-period crossover study. The pharmacokinetics and safety of single doses of abacavir (600 mg), ZDV (300 mg), and 3TC (150 mg) were evaluated when each drug was given alone or when any two or three drugs were given concurrently. The concentrations of all drugs in plasma and the concentrations of ZDV and its 5'-glucuronide metabolite, GZDV, in urine were measured for up to 24 h postdosing, and pharmacokinetic parameter values were calculated by noncompartmental methods. The maximum drug concentration (Cmax), the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity), time to Cmax (Tmax), and apparent elimination half-life (t1/2) of abacavir in plasma were unaffected by coadministration with ZDV and/or 3TC. Coadministration of abacavir with ZDV (with or without 3TC) decreased the mean Cmax of ZDV by approximately 20% (from 1.5 to 1.2 microg/ml), delayed the median Tmax for ZDV by 0.5 h, increased the mean AUC0-infinity for GZDV by up to 40% (from 11.8 to 16.5 microg. h/ml), and delayed the median Tmax for GZDV by approximately 0.5 h. Coadministration of abacavir with 3TC (with or without ZDV) decreased the mean AUC0-infinity for 3TC by approximately 15% (from 5.1 to 4.3 microg. h/ml), decreased the mean Cmax by approximately 35% (from 1.4 to 0.9 microg/ml), and delayed the median Tmax by approximately 1 h. While these changes were statistically significant, they are similar to the effect of food intake (for ZDV) or affect an inactive metabolite (for GZDV) or are relatively minor (for 3TC) and are therefore not considered to be clinically significant. No significant differences were found in the urinary recoveries of ZDV or GZDV when ZDV was coadministered with abacavir. There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between ZDV and 3TC. Mild to moderate headache, nausea, lymphadenopathy, hematuria, musculoskeletal chest pain, neck stiffness, and fever were the most common adverse events reported by those who received abacavir. Coadministration of ZDV or 3TC with abacavir did not alter this adverse event profile. The three-drug regimen was primarily associated with gastrointestinal events. In conclusion, no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions occurred between abacavir, ZDV, and 3TC in HIV-1-infected adults. Coadministration of abacavir with ZDV or 3TC produced mild changes in the absorption and possibly the urinary excretion characteristics of ZDV-GZDV and 3TC that were not considered to be clinically significant. Coadministration of abacavir with ZDV and/or 3TC was generally well tolerated and did not produce unexpected adverse events.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine vs indinavir-lamivudine-zidovudine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults: A randomized equivalence trial.

CONTEXT: Abacavir, a nucleoside analogue, has demonstrated suppression of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication alone and in combination therapy. However, the role of abacavir in a triple nucleoside combination regimen has not been evaluated against a standard protease inhibitor-containing regimen for initial antiretroviral treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate antiretroviral equivalence and safety of an abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine regimen compared with an indinavir-lamivudine-zidovudine regimen. DESIGN AND SETTING: A multicenter, phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial with an enrollment period from August 1997 to June 1998, with follow-up through 48 weeks at 73 clinical research units in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Europe. PATIENTS: Five hundred sixty-two antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected adults with a plasma HIV RNA level of at least 10 000 copies/mL and a CD4 cell count of at least 100 x 10(6)/L. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified by baseline HIV RNA level and randomly assigned to receive a combination tablet containing 150 mg of lamivudine and 300 mg of zidovudine twice daily plus either 300 mg of abacavir twice daily and indinavir placebo or 800 mg of indinavir every 8 hours daily plus abacavir placebo. After 16 weeks, patients with confirmed HIV RNA levels greater than 400 copies/mL were eligible to continue receiving randomized treatment or receive open-label therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Virologic suppression, defined as HIV RNA concentration of 400 copies/mL or less at week 48. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who met the end point of having an HIV RNA level of 400 copies/mL or less at week 48 was equivalent in the abacavir group (51% [133/262]) and in the indinavir group (51% [136/265]) with a treatment difference of -0.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], -9% to 8%). In patients with baseline HIV RNA levels greater than 100 000 copies/mL, the proportion of patients achieving less than 50 copies/mL was greater in the indinavir group than in the abacavir group with 45% (45/100) vs 31% (30/96) and a treatment diference of -14% (95% CI, -27% to 0%). The 2 treatments were comparable with respect to their effects on CD4 cell count. There was no difference between groups in the frequency of treatment-limiting adverse events or laboratory abnormalities. One death in the abacavir group was attributed to hypersensitivity reaction, which occurred following rechallenge with abacavir, approximately 3 weeks after initiating study treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults, the triple nucleoside regimen of abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine was equivalent to the regimen of indinavir-lamivudine-zidovudine in achieving a plasma HIV RNA level of less than 400 copies/mL at 48 weeks.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Hypersensitivity reactions during therapy with the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor abacavir.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions consist of a variable group of clinical findings and have been described for a wide variety of chemical compounds. OBJECTIVE: This review characterizes the clinical profile of hypersensitivity to the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor abacavir sulfate. METHODS: We performed a retrospective medical review of pooled adverse events data from approximately 200,000 patients who received abacavir in clinical trials, through expanded-access programs, or by prescription from 1996 through 2000. Screened cases of hypersensitivity were classified as either definitive or probable. Definitive cases were identified when initial symptoms resolved on interruption of abacavir therapy and returned on reintroduction of abacavir therapy. RESULTS: A total of 1803 cases were identified, 1302 in the 30,595 patients participating in clinical trials or the expanded-access program and 501 in patients from the post-marketing experience. On review, 176 (9.8%) of these cases were considered definitive and the remainder probable. Based on the 1302 cases identified in clinical trials or the expanded-access program, the calculated incidence of hypersensitivity was 4.3%. Symptoms reported in > or = 20% of cases of this multiorgan reaction included fever, rash, malaise/fatigue, and gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, among others. Respiratory symptoms occurred in 30% of cases and included dyspnea (12%), cough (10%), and pharyngitis (6%). In 90% of cases, hypersensitivity reactions occurred within the first 6 weeks after initiation of abacavir (median time, 11 days); after an initial reaction, rechallenge with abacavir resulted in the reappearance of symptoms within hours of reexposure. Hypotension was present in 25% of these rechallenge reactions. Among patients who received abacavir in clinical trials, the mortality rate was 0.03% (3 per 10,000 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Hypersensitivity to abacavir is an idiosyncratic reaction and a distinct clinical syndrome characterized predominantly by systemic involvement. It can be expected to appear as a treatment-limiting event in approximately 5% of patients. The appearance of clinical symptoms consistent with this syndrome mandates immediate discontinuation of abacavir. Hypersensitivity to abacavir is an absolute contraindication to subsequent treatment with any formulation that includes this agent.

Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic↗
PubMed2000

Resistance profile of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor abacavir (1592U89) after monotherapy and combination therapy. CNA2001 Investigative Group.

Abacavir (1592U89) is a nucleoside inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 reverse transcriptase (RT). Resistance to abacavir was studied with abacavir alone and with abacavir in combination with other nucleoside analogues in cell culture, in virus isolates from zidovudine/lamivudine clinical trials, and in the first dose-escalating 12-week clinical trial (CNA2001) to evaluate abacavir clinical potency. Abacavir alone in vitro selected for mutations at HIV RT codons K65R, L74V, Y115F, and M184V. However, abacavir combined with zidovudine selected against virus with the M184V mutation. Abacavir therapy in vivo resulted in large decreases in HIV load (>1 log), even in 1 subject who had the M184V mutation at baseline. A total of 51% of subjects showed new mutations at any of codons K65R, L74V, and M184V after abacavir monotherapy, compared with 11% who received zidovudine/abacavir. Small changes (2- to 4-fold) in abacavir susceptibility were detected. On stopping therapy, reselection of the pretherapy sequence occurred within 4 weeks.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2005

Weight related differences in the pharmacokinetics of abacavir in HIV-infected patients.

AIM: To study the possible influence of patient characteristics on abacavir pharmacokinetics. METHODS: A population pharmacokinetic model for abacavir was developed using data from 188 adult patients by the use of a nonlinear mixed effects modelling method performed with NONMEM. RESULTS: Abacavir pharmacokinetics was well described by a two-compartment open model with linear absorption and elimination. Typical population estimates for the absorption rate constant (Ka), the apparent central distribution volume (Vc/F), the apparent peripheral distribution volume (Vp/F), the apparent intercompartmental clearance (Q/F) and the apparent plasma clearance (CL/F) were 1.8 h(-1), 75 l, 23.6 l, 10 l h(-1) and 47.5 l h(-1), respectively. Apparent plasma clearance was positively related to bodyweight. Individual Bayesian estimates of CL/F were used to calculate abacavir AUC. The latter decreased from 10.7 +/- 5.0 to 5.7 +/- 1.6 mgh l(-1) when bodyweight increased from 36 to 102 kg. This drop in abacavir exposure could lead to suboptimal treatment for the heaviest patients, as antiviral efficacy of abacavir is known to be related to its AUC. A 400 mg abacavir dose would be necessary to achieve adequate exposure to abacavir in patients weighing more than 60 kg. CONCLUSIONS: The apparent plasma clearance of abacavir was positively related to bodyweight. The efficacy of the current recommended abacavir dosage for patients with high bodyweight should be evaluated in further studies.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Safety and single-dose pharmacokinetics of abacavir (1592U89) in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children.

Abacavir (formerly 1592U89) is a potent 2'-deoxyguanosine analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor that has been demonstrated to have a favorable safety profile in initial clinical trials with adults with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 infection. A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of abacavir following the administration of two single oral doses (4 and 8 mg/kg of body weight) to 22 HIV-infected children ages 3 months to 13 years. Plasma was collected for analysis at predose and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 5, and 8 h after the administration of each dose. Plasma abacavir concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and data were analyzed by noncompartmental methods. Abacavir was well tolerated by all subjects. The single abacavir-related adverse event was rash, which occurred in 2 of 22 subjects. After administration of the oral solution, abacavir was rapidly absorbed, with the time to the peak concentration in plasma occurring within 1.5 h postdosing. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were comparable among the different age groups for each dose level. The mean maximum concentration in plasma (Cmax) and the mean area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) increased by 16 and 45% more than predicted, respectively, as the abacavir dose was doubled from 4 to 8 mg/kg (Cmax increased from 1.69 to 3.94 micrograms/ml, and AUC0-infinity increased from 2.82 to 8.09 micrograms.h/ml). Abacavir was rapidly eliminated, with a mean elimination half-life of 0.98 to 1.13 h. The mean apparent clearance from plasma decreased from 27.35 to 18.88 ml/min/kg as the dose increased. Neither body surface area nor creatinine clearance were correlated with pharmacokinetic estimates at either dose. The extent of exposure to abacavir appears to be slightly lower in children than in adults, with the comparable unit doses being based on body weight. In conclusion, this study showed that abacavir is safe and well tolerated in children when it is administered as a single oral dose of 4 or 8 mg/kg.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Pharmacokinetic interaction of abacavir (1592U89) and ethanol in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults.

While in vitro results at clinically relevant concentrations do not predict abacavir (1592U89) interactions with drugs highly metabolized by cytochrome P450, the potential does exist for a pharmacokinetic interaction between abacavir and ethanol, as both are metabolized by alcohol dehydrogenase. Twenty-five subjects were enrolled in an open-label, randomized, three-way-crossover, phase I study of human immunodeficiency virus-infected male subjects. The three treatments were administration of (i) 600 mg of abacavir, (ii) 0.7 g of ethanol per kg of body weight, and (iii) 600 mg of abacavir and 0.7 g of ethanol per kg. Twenty-four subjects completed the study with no unexpected adverse events reported. Ethanol pharmacokinetic parameters were unchanged with abacavir coadministration. The geometric least squares mean area under the concentration curve extrapolated to infinite time for abacavir increased 41% (from 11.07 to 15.62 microg. h/ml), and the half-life increased 26% (from 1.42 to 1.79 h) in the presence of ethanol (mean ethanol maximum concentration in plasma of 498 microg/ml). The percentages of abacavir dose recovered in urine as abacavir and its two major metabolites were each altered in the presence of ethanol, but there was no change in the total percentage ( approximately 50%) of administered dose recovered in the 12-h collection interval. In conclusion, while a single 600-mg dose of abacavir does not alter blood ethanol concentration, ethanol does increase plasma abacavir concentrations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Abacavir: a review of its clinical potential in patients with HIV infection.

UNLABELLED: Abacavir is a carbocyclic 2'-deoxyguanosine nucleoside analogue. It is metabolised intracellularly to a 2'-deoxyguanosine nucleoside analogue which competitively inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase and terminates proviral DNA chain extension. In double-blind trials in antiretroviral therapy-experienced or -naive patients, reductions in HIV RNA levels were greater and more prolonged in patients receiving abacavir in combination with other antiretroviral drugs than in those receiving placebo in combination with the same agents. Furthermore, abacavir in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine reduced viral load to below detectable levels in a proportion of patients, and to a similar extent to the protease inhibitor indinavir in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine. Greatest viral load reductions were seen in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients. Preliminary results suggest that the viral suppression achieved with a protease inhibitor plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) can be maintained as effectively with abacavir in combination with 2 NRTIs as it can be by continuing the protease inhibitor-containing treatment regimen. Initial virological data from studies of combination regimens including abacavir and protease inhibitors appear promising but larger controlled trials are required to confirm these observations. Nausea is the most frequently reported adverse event in patients receiving abacavir-containing combination therapy. Adverse events tend to be reported most frequently soon after starting treatment; the majority of events are mild or moderate in intensity and transient. Other adverse events reported in >5% of patients include vomiting, malaise and fatigue, headache, diarrhoea, sleep disorders, cough, anorexia and rash. A major cause of abacavir treatment discontinuation is the development of a hypersensitivity reaction which has been reported in 3 to 5% of patients. The reaction usually occurs within 6 weeks of commencing treatment, shows evidence of multiorgan system involvement and typically includes fever and/or rash. Symptoms resolve rapidly after discontinuation of treatment. Continuing treatment or rechallenge can result in more severe symptoms, life-threatening hypotension and even death. CONCLUSION: Abacavir used in combination with other antiretroviral drugs effectively reduces viral load in both adults and children with HIV infection. Although these responses are greatest in individuals with little or no previous antiretroviral treatment, useful responses are still sometimes achieved in heavily pretreated individuals. Abacavir in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine provides a simple and convenient dosage regimen which is generally well tolerated, able to produce sustained suppression of viral replication and has the advantage of sparing other classes of antiretroviral drugs for subsequent use. This triple combination represents an alternative antiretroviral regimen for patients intolerant to protease inhibitors or those wishing to retain the option of protease inhibitors for later use. Further clinical studies are needed to define the activity of abacavir in combination with protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

A randomized comparative trial of tenofovir DF or abacavir as replacement for a thymidine analogue in persons with lipoatrophy.

BACKGROUND: Long-term antiretroviral therapy, while dramatically reducing HIV-related morbidity and mortality, is associated with metabolic and morphological changes. Peripheral fat loss, lipoatrophy, appears most associated with prolonged therapy with thymidine nucleoside analogues. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, comparative study of switching from a thymidine nucleoside analogue to either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) or abacavir in 105 individuals on successful antiretroviral therapy with clinically evident moderate to severe lipoatrophy. RESULTS: Individuals were randomized to tenofovir DF (52) or abacavir (53). The switch was well tolerated and the majority of patients completed 48 weeks of study. One individual in the tenofovir DF group and three in the abacavir group discontinued due to drug-related adverse events. Both groups similarly maintained virological control. Limb fat mass increased similarly in both groups: mean increases by week 48 of 329 and 483 g in tenofovir DF and abacavir groups, respectively [mean 95% confidence interval for difference, -154.3 (range -492.8 to 184.3)]. This change from baseline was statistically significant in both groups (tenofovir DF, P = 0.01; abacavir, P = 0.0001). Mean total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides improved modestly with switching to tenofovir DF but were unchanged with abacavir. The changes in these parameters were significantly greater in the tenofovir DF arm relative to abacavir. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from a thymidine nucleoside analogue to either tenofovir DF or abacavir leads to significant improvement in limb fat mass over 48 weeks. Tenofovir DF may have modest advantages over abacavir for changes in lipids. Peripheral lipoatrophy, when clinically apparent, resolves slowly following treatment switching.

Adenine↗
PubMed2006

Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction in primary HIV infection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors associated with the abacavir hypersensitivity reaction during primary HIV infection (PHI). DESIGN: Acute HIV Infection and Early Disease Research Program protocol (AIEDRP) AI-02-001 provided antiretroviral therapy including abacavir. This retrospective analysis evaluated variables potentially associated with hypersensitivity in the cohort enrolled in AI-02-001 at the University of Washington Primary Infection Clinic. METHODS: Cases of suspected hypersensitivity were identified prospectively and reviewed retrospectively using a standardized case definition. Controls were the remaining cohort without hypersensitivity. Univariate analyses were performed by linear logistic regression. RESULTS: Nine (18%) of 50 individuals treated with abacavir developed suspected hypersensitivity. Two of nine cases and no controls were HLA-B5701 positive. When antiretroviral medications were started, cases had lower mean CD8 T-cell percentage and plasma HIV RNA value. After 2 weeks on abacavir, cases had a lower mean HIV RNA value and a trend towards greater decrease in RNA. Cases began abacavir a median of 103 days after HIV acquisition compared to 48 days for controls. There was no significant in vitro abacavir-specific lymphoproliferation or IFN-gamma production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from individuals following the suspected hypersensitivity reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Abacavir use during PHI may be associated with increased risk of hypersensitivity. As in chronic infection, HLA-B5701 is associated with the abacavir hypersensitivity reaction in PHI. Although levels of CD8 T cells and HIV RNA may be risk factors for hypersensitivity, the observed association may be due to correlation with HLA-B5701. The interesting temporal association of hypersensitivity with initiation of abacavir later in PHI merits future investigation.

Adult↗