Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ANUS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[The long-term evaluation of artificial myoplastic anus and artificial classical anus based on manometric and radiological examinations].

The aim of this study was comparative evaluation of the pressure profile in the artificial myoplastic anus and the one created by the use of classical method. Radiological examinations of the colon by the use of the contrasting agent were performed in all patients in each group. In the group of patients with artificial myoplastic anus radiological examinations showed the narrowing of the lumen 4-7 cm in length in all patients. Above the narrowing the widening of the lumen was present. Reflexive flow of the contrasting agent from the colon was not present. In the group of patients with the artificial classical anus the narrowing of the terminal part of the colon was not noticed in the radiological examination. In all patients the reverse flow of the contrasting agent through the artificial anus was observed. Patients with the artificial myoplastic anus created by the use of pedunculated fold of the muscular coat of the colon have much higher average pressures around the myoplastic sphincter than in the presphincteric area, while the patients with the artificial classical anus did not present the area with the increased pressure in the terminal part of the colon. The possibility of preventing uncontrolled defecation and flatulence by the patients with the artificial myoplastic anus is related to the repeatedly higher pressures around the sphincter than in the presphincteric area, which do not decrease as the time passes by after the surgery.

Anal Canal↗

Anteriorly located anus: is constipation caused by abnormal location of the anus?

Anteriorly located anus (ALA) is frequently associated with severe constipation accompanied by defecation pain. Between 1988 and 1994, the authors treated 27 children (26 girls, 1 boy; age range, 0 to 11 years) to surgically correct ALA. The operation was performed according to a uniform protocol to longitudinally divide the internal sphincter muscle from the anal skin level to 2 cm above the dentate line on the posterior wall of the anorectum. For anal reconstruction, any of the conventional procedures was employed. Twenty-two of the 27 patients have had follow-up in our clinic for 12 months to 6 years (mean, 2.75 years). Eighteen are completely free of constipation and defecation pain and have regular spontaneous bowel movements. The other four require occasional use of enemas or laxatives. Anal incontinence did not occur in any patient. The results of this study suggest that abnormal function of the internal sphincter is the most likely cause of constipation or defecation pain in patients with ALA and that internal sphincterotomy is the cornerstone of surgical treatment.

Anal Canal↗

[Mathematical-physical deliberations over the development of artificial-anus prolapse (and the therefrom derived attachment technic for the artificial anus)].

It is established that most colostomies which lead to prolapse because of imperfect operative technique are shaped like a truncated cone. Mathematical-physical considerations show mechanisms which in such cases can produce prolapse of the colostomy. Considering these criteria and recent clinical experience, a suitable colostomy is described.

Colostomy↗

Association of imperforate anus with occult spinal dysraphism.

Neurological deficits may occur in some children with imperforate anus produced by unrecognized spinal cord anomalies amenable to neurosurgical correction. Although this association has been well described, its frequency has not been defined. The authors prospectively studied 45 infants with imperforate anus from 1985 to 1992 to establish the frequency of this association. Eighteen infants (40%) had high imperforate anus, 24 had low imperforate anus (53%), and 3 had anal stenosis (7%). All underwent radiographic spinal cord imaging in early infancy, which consisted of radiographs (45), ultrasound (26), magnetic resonance imaging (29), computed tomography (1), and myelography (1). Thirty-three percent of the patients with imperforate anus had bony sacral abnormalities. Eight infants were discovered to have spinal cord abnormalities. Two of those infants had obvious myelomeningocele at birth, and 6 infants (14%) had occult spinal dysraphism consisting of tethered cord with or without associated lipoma of the cord. There was no correlation between the presence of tethered cord and the gender of the infants, the type of malformation (high versus low imperforate anus), or the presence of sacral dysplasia (Fisher's exact test). Five of the infants who were found to have tethered cord underwent neurosurgical intervention and repair of the defect, and 1 infant was followed up clinically. The mean follow-up time of all the infants was 2.5 +/- 0.9 (+/- SD) years. No neurological sequelae occurred in the infants who had surgical correction. The frequency of occult spinal dysraphism with imperforate anus was 14%. It was independent of the type of imperforate anus or the coexistence of bony sacral anomalies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anus Diseases↗

Imperforate anus: US determination of the type with infracoccygeal approach.

PURPOSE: To assess the usefulness of infracoccygeal transperineal ultrasonography (US) in differentiation between high- and low-type imperforate anus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infracoccygeal US was prospectively performed with a 7-10-MHz linear-array transducer prior to corrective surgery in 14 neonates with imperforate anus. The approach site was just inferior to the coccyx and posterior to the anus. Transverse images of the anorectal area were obtained. The puborectalis muscle was identified, and the relationship between the puborectalis muscle and the distal rectal pouch was evaluated. US findings were compared with surgical findings. RESULTS: In 10 neonates, a low-type imperforate anus was correctly diagnosed at infracoccygeal US. In those with low-type imperforate anus, the puborectalis muscle was seen as a hypoechoic U-shaped band (n = 10), and the distal rectal pouch passed through the puborectalis muscle (n = 10). In four neonates with high-type imperforate anus, the puborectalis muscle was not identified (n = 4). CONCLUSION: Infracoccygeal transperineal US enables the determination of the type of imperforate anus.

Anus, Imperforate↗

Anatomical basis for the interposition of a gastric pouch between the ileum and the anus after total proctocolectomy.

After a total proctocolectomy, ileoanal continuity is achieved by an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. This anastomosis is not possible when the ileum cannot reach the anus. To avoid definitive ileostomy in this circumstance, we devised a gastric pouch, taken from the left half of the vertical portion of the stomach, vascularized by the right gastroepiploic pedicle, then interposed it between the ileum and the anus. The aim of this anatomical study on seven cadavers was to estimate the capacity of this gastric pouch to reach the anus. The distance between the caudal edge of the pubic symphysis and the apex of the pouch was measured. It is accepted that an ileal pouch always reaches the anus without tension if it comes down 6 cm below the caudal edge of the pubic symphysis. The apex of the gastric pouch reached a mean of 13.3 cm (range 10-18 cm) below the caudal edge of the pubic symphysis. This technique was then performed on four patients. The apex of the gastric pouch reached a mean of 12.5 cm (range 10-14 cm) below the caudal edge of the pubic symphysis and always reached the anus. These findings emphasize that a gastric pouch interposed between the ileum and the anus after a total proctocolectomy has an excellent capacity to reach the anus without tension.

Anal Canal↗

Three-flap anoplasty for imperforate anus: results for primary procedure or for redoes.

UNLABELLED: Three-flap anoplasty was first described in 1987 by Yazbeck for the treatment of rectal prolapse after pull-through operations for imperforate anus, and in 1992 in a case of anterior perineal approach. It is intended to reproduce the normal anatomy of a sensitive anal canal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate 14 children (9 boys and 5 girls) operated for imperforate anus. METHOD: Eleven children had an intermediate or high imperforate anus and 3 had a low imperforate anus. Nine were operated for the first time with a three-flap anoplasty (GrA), and 5 were reoperated with this technique because of fecal incontinence and/or rectal prolapse (GrB). Seven patients had associated malformations: one Hirschsprung's disease, one cloacal defect with renal insufficiency, three complex caudal malformations with tethered cord, one Down syndrome, and two psychological and psychomotor troubles. The patients (average age = 6 years) have been evaluated every year since 1997, with a questionnaire based on a clinical score validated with 30 healthy children, used as a control group. Ten anal manometries were carried out. RESULTS: In 1998, the GrA score was 16.1 (control = 22.5) and the GrB score was 11.5 (p = 0.25). In 1999, GrA and GrB score were approximately the same. The score of those without associated anomalies was 19.6 whereas the score of the children with other malformations or anomalies was 10 (p = 0.02). Anal manometry is almost normal in patients with low or intermediate imperforate anus (rectoanal relaxation reflex for 10 cm H2O, and basal resting pressure more than 40 cm H2O). Even though anal manometry is subnormal in patients with Down syndrome or psychomotor troubles, the clinical score remains low (score = 10). In cases of complex caudal malformations or high imperforate anus, the results of anal manometry and clinical score are bad (score 9.7). CONCLUSION: The three-flap anoplasty can be carried out in newborns without colostomy and often represents the only possible surgical approach to avoid a laparotomy. This plasty, proposed secondarily to correct a defect of continence, can be performed without colostomy, with satisfactory results.

Anus, Imperforate↗