Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ANTISEPTICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Antiseptic susceptibility and distribution of antiseptic-resistance genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

We examined the antiseptic susceptibilities and distribution of antiseptic-resistance genes qacA and smr in 98 isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus obtained in 1992. Seventy-one strains were resistant to antiseptics. The qacA and smr genes were detected in 10 and 20 strains, respectively. The remaining 41 strains without qacA and smr were divided into two groups that exhibited low-level (n = 22) and high-level (n = 19) resistance to acriflavin. DNA cloning and sequencing suggested that norfloxacin-resistance gene norA was responsible for the high-level resistance to acriflavin. Our results indicated that four or more antiseptic-resistance genes exist in methicillin-resistant S. aureus and that antiseptic-resistant methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains without qacA and smr are widely spread in Japan.

Acriflavine↗
PubMed1998

[Antiseptic efficacy and acceptance of Octenisept computed with common antiseptic mouthwashes].

The efficacy of common antiseptic mouth rinses was evaluated in a study with healthy volunteers. Octenisept and Cetylpyridiniumchlorid had a significant stronger impact on the microbial burden of the oral cavity than Chlorhexidin (Corsodyl) immediately and 10 min after the application. Dobendan (contains Cetylpyridiniumchlorid) showed a better antimicrobial effect than Corsodyl immediately after application, after 10 min an increasing loss of efficacy was noted. The antiseptic efficacy of hexetidin-based Gurfix was very similar to the efficacy observed with Corsodyl from the start of the antiseptic treatment until 1 h later. Acriflavine-solution (0.2% m/v) was significantly less efficient after 10, 30 and 60 min compared to Corsodyl. The antimicrobial impact of Fluomint-Lysoform was very similar to the effect of rinsing with dest. sterile water. A subjective assessment of taste and smell of the mouth rinse solutions concludes the evaluation. Further methodological aspects for a common test guideline for antiseptic mouth rinse solutions are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Contaminated antiseptics--an unnecessary hospital hazard.

A total of 284 antiseptic solutions were studied to check for their sterility. The overall antiseptic contamination rate was 15.14%. 14.85% of freshly prepared antiseptics were contaminated. Here, the problem could be attributed to inadequate precautions while preparing the antiseptics. 15.3% of the in-use antiseptics were contaminated. This could be due to improper handling. Non-fermenters (45.45%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.30%) and Klebsiella spp. (22.72%) were the commonest organisms recovered from the antiseptics. In 44.44% of patients, the isolates obtained from the catheterised urine in the same wards matched with the isolates from antiseptics of that ward. Antiseptic solutions have to be regularly monitored. If they are found to be contaminated, they should be discarded immediately and replaced by fresh sterile antiseptics otherwise instead of preventing infection, antiseptics will become a source of hospital-acquired infection.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2001

In vitro and in vivo efficacy of catheters impregnated with antiseptics or antibiotics: evaluation of the risk of bacterial resistance to the antimicrobials in the catheters.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a new antiseptic catheter containing silver sulfadiazine and chlorhexidine on the external surface and chlorhexidine in the lumens to an antibiotic catheter impregnated with minocycline and rifampin on its external and luminal surfaces. DESIGN: Experimental trial. METHODS: Antimicrobial spectrum of catheters was determined by zones of inhibition. Resistance to luminal colonization was tested in vitro by locking catheter lumens with Staphylococcus epidermidis or Staphylococcus aureus culture after 7 days of perfusion. In vitro development of resistance to the antiseptic or antibiotic combination used in catheters was investigated. In vivo efficacy was tested (rat subcutaneous model) by challenge with sensitive or antibiotic-resistant bacteria. RESULTS: Antiseptic and antibiotic catheters exhibited broad-spectrum action. However, antibiotic catheters were not effective against Candida species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Both catheters prevented luminal colonization. Compared to controls, both test catheters resisted colonization when challenged with S aureus 7 and 14 days' postimplant (P<.05). Repeated in vitro exposure of S epidermidis culture to the antibiotic and antiseptic combinations led to small increases in the minimum inhibitory concentration (15 times and 2 times, respectively). Unlike the antibiotic catheter, the in vitro and in vivo activity of the antiseptic catheter was unaffected by the resistance profile of the test organism. Antiseptic catheters were more effective than antibiotic catheters in preventing colonization by rifampin-resistant S epidermidis in vivo (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Antiseptic and antibiotic catheters exhibit similar efficacy; however, when challenged with a rifampin-resistant strain, the antibiotic catheter appeared to be more susceptible to colonization than the antiseptic device.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

The pattern of adsorption of cationic antiseptics to polymethylmethacrylate.

Few studies have reported the maximum potential of surfaces to adsorb the cationic antiseptics and few comparisons between antiseptics have been carried out. The purpose of this investigation was to measure the maximum uptake of alexidine, cetyl pyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine gluconate and chlorhexidine acetate to polymethylmethacrylate and by the construction of adsorption isotherms determine the pattern of molecular attachment to the recipient surface. The mean maximum adsorption findings for these antiseptics demonstrated significantly greater uptake of cetyl pyridinium chloride than the other antiseptics and significantly less uptake of alexidine compared with the other antiseptics. All four antiseptics showed a Langmuir type adsorption isotherm consistent with the formation of a monolayer of molecules on the recipient surface. For chlorhexidine preliminary studies demonstrated that the pattern of adsorption was not altered by saliva pre-treatment of surfaces. No evidence of molecular multilayering was observed even at higher concentrations of the antiseptics. However, the maximum uptake on to the surface was significantly increased when no post-treatment washings were carried out. It was concluded that this increased uptake would be unlikely to play an important role in antiplaque activity because of its relative instability. The pH dependency for the adsorption of these antiseptics was demonstrated such that as previously observed for chlorhexidine gluconate at low pH adsorption is almost completely, or completely, prevented.

Adsorption↗
PubMed1984

[Verification of the effectiveness of neutralization in the in vivo study of antiseptics].

Well defined controls of the effectiveness of antiseptic neutralizing agents in vitro already exist (Afnor Standards for antiseptics and disinfectants). Conversely, there is currently no standard method for verifying how effectively such agents neutralize antiseptics which have been applied to the skin. We describe a method in which the neutralizing solution is first applied to the antiseptic-treated skin and then filtered to remove skin flora. The effect of the neutralizing agent is then checked using a test organism (Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990) in parallel with four controls: viability of the test organism (T1), activity of the untreated antiseptic (T2), non-bactericidal effect of the neutralizing agent (T3) and of skin secretions (4). Skin sampling was carried out using Gaschen's bag method for the hands and the Williamson and Kligman method modified by Fleurette for other sites. Twelve soaps and/or antiseptics were studied. In each case, activity of the antiseptic (T2) was confirmed, except when the product under study was a non-bactericidal soap. Bacterial counts obtained in controls T3 and T4 and in the neutralization test itself were always greater than 80% of the control value (T1). Occasionally, the counts in the neutralization test exceeded 100% of the T1 value, probably because of the dispersal effect of the triton X100 present in the neutralizing solution. This method thus offers a means of standardizing the study of antiseptics in vivo. In addition, the test organism, Staphylococcus epidermidis, is more representative of the skin flora than the bacterial strains recommended by Afnor for in vitro studies.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed1999

Cost-effectiveness of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection.

CONTEXT: A recent randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis indicated that central venous catheters impregnated with an antiseptic combination of chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine are efficacious in reducing the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI); however, the ultimate clinical and economic consequences of their use have not been formally evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental clinical and economic outcomes associated with the use of antiseptic-impregnated vs standard catheters. DESIGN: Decision analytic model using data from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and case-control studies, as well as safety data from the US Food and Drug Administration. SETTING AND PATIENTS: A hypothetical cohort of hospitalized patients at high risk for catheter-related infections (eg, patients in intensive care units, immunosuppressed patients, and patients receiving total parenteral nutrition) requiring use of a central venous catheter. INTERVENTION: Short-term use (2-10 days) of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated multilumen central venous catheters and nonimpregnated catheters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Expected incidence of CR-BSI and death attributable to antiseptic-impregnated and standard catheter use; direct medical costs for both types of catheters. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, use of antiseptic-impregnated catheters resulted in a decrease in the incidence of CR-BSI of 2.2% (5.2% for standard vs 3.0% for antiseptic-impregnated catheters), a decrease in the incidence of death of 0.33% (0.78% for standard vs 0.45% for antiseptic-impregnated), and a decrease in costs of $196 per catheter used ($532 for standard vs $336 for antiseptic-impregnated). The decrease in CR-BSI ranged from 1.2% to 3.4%, the decrease in death ranged from 0.09% to 0.78%, and the costs saved ranged from $68 to $391 in a multivariate sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Our analyses suggest that use of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters in patients at high risk for catheter-related infections reduces the incidence of CR-BSI and death and provides significant saving in costs. Use of these catheters should be considered as part of a comprehensive nosocomial infection control program.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The formation of stain on acrylic surfaces by the interaction of cationic antiseptic mouthwashes and tea.

Clinical and in vitro studies have implicated dietary components as major aetiological factors in staining of teeth and acrylic materials associated with chlorhexidine use, a local side effect not unique to this antiseptic. These experiments studied the precipitation and surface staining reactions of the cationic antiseptics alexidine, cetyl pyridinium chloride (CPC), chlorhexidine, and hexetidine, with the beverage tea. All of the antiseptics precipitated a standard tea solution and for alexidine and chlorhexidine acetate and gluconate, this was at concentrations greater than 100 mumol/L, for hexetidine greater than 200 mumol/L, and for CPC greater than 400 mumol/L. With the exception of CPC precipitation was reduced with decreasing pH and for chlorhexidine was inhibited below pH 3. The addition of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) to the antiseptic solutions increased the precipitation concentrations by an amount calculated to be adsorbed by polymer. Acrylic blocks treated with equimolar solutions of the antiseptics became progressively and significantly more stained by tea than control specimens over a 5-day period. Alexidine induced significantly greater staining and hexetidine significantly less than the other antiseptics. Staining was pH dependent and significantly reduced as the pH decreased. Both stain and precipitates were insoluble in strong acids and alkalis. It is concluded that staining observed clinically may represent a precipitation reaction with the complexing of antiseptics with dietary chromogenic material.

Acrylates↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for prevention of catheter-related infection in intensive care unit patients.

Central venous catheterization represents a significant medical advancement, particularly in the treatment of critical ill. However, there is a high risk of central venous catheters-related infection. A novel antiseptic central venous catheter, made of polyurethane and impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine, was developed to reduce the risk of catheters-related infection. In this study, we did a randomized clinical study to determine the efficacy by using antiseptic catheters for the prevention of central venous catheters-related infection in the intensive care units. A total of 204 patients with 235 central venous catheters were studied at the surgical intensive care units at National Taiwan University Hospital between November 1998 and June 1999. Participants received either a standard triple-lumen polyurethane catheter or an antiseptic catheter (Arrow International, Reading, Pennsylvania, USA). Both were indistinguishable from each other. Compared to standard polyurethane catheters, antiseptic catheters were less likely to be colonized by microorganisms when they were cultured at the removal (8.0 versus 20.0 colonized catheters per 100 catheters; relative risk 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.74]; p<0.01). There was no significant differences between both groups in catheter-related infections (0.9 versus 4.9 infections per 100 catheters; relative risk 0.17 [95% CI, 0.03 to 1.15]; p = 0.07). Gram-positive cocci and fungi were more likely to colonize in the standard polyurethane catheters (p = 0.06 and 0.04, compared to antiseptic catheters respectively). Two of our cases in the control group died directly due to catheter-related candidemia. No adverse reactions such as hypersensitivity or leukopenia were found in the antiseptic catheter group. Our study showed that central venous catheters with antiseptic coating were safe and had less risk of colonization of bacteria and fungi than standard catheters in the critically ill patients.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗